Understanding Conveyancing Principles
Understanding Conveyancing Principles
CONVEYANCING
INTRODUCTION
- Conveyancing Rules
- Reforms
o Is it jurisdictional?
o Is it a private contract?
The first theory is that it is a quasi-jurisdictional act. Section 23 of the Law of Contract Act. The second
theory is that it is a private act (contractual) and the state has no law (right?) whatsoever to interfere.
Conveyancing is a hybrid of both contracts and jurisdiction. It has everything to do with domestic law. There
are mandatory rules that must be observed.
Conveyancing is the transfer of an interest in property. Abbey & Richards definition – the process by which
legal title to property is transferred. The word conveyancing derives its meaning from this very definition. It
is basically to convey. Documents used to convey interest from one party to another.
Conveyancing is the voluntary transfer of interest in property. However, there are instances where
conveyances are compulsory. E.g where a chargee or mortgagee is exercising its statutory power of sale,
where by operation of the law, interest must be transferred to another party.
1. Process – All applications from the appointment of the estate agent to the time you actually get
a duly registered title.
3. Transfer – Voluntary transfer. You can also transfer title to yourself e.g if you are a beneficiary
of an estate. Also includes the modification of ownership e.g in joint tenants.
Conveyancing is the art or science of conveying or effecting the transfer of property or modifying interests
in relation to the property by means of a written document.
Conveyancing is the only branch of law that takes from all other branches of the law. E.g the law of contract
– the sale agreement. Property Law and Land Law, Equity, Commercial Law etc.
Defensive Conveyancing
This involves protecting the client, for instance, from negligence claims. Do not allow your client to dictate
you! Be on alert for any sort of fraud, for instance mortgage fraud. Try to stop any criminal acts. Exercise
caution.
In Momanyi v Hatimy & Anor [2003] KLR 545 the advocate was sued in negligence and misrepresentation.
The advocate had failed to conduct a search and advised the client that the property was unencumbered.
Page 2 of 46
The client paid the purchase price. It later on turned out that the property was actually encumbered and
title could not be transferred. The client filed a suit and sought summary judgment. The court struck out the
advocates defence and granted summary judgment. On appeal, the Court of Appeal stated that in a claim
for damages in negligence, any defendant who had denied negligence was entitled to unconditionally
defend the suit.
In the case of Juma Muchemi v Charles Waweru Gatonye T/A Waweru Gatonye & Co. Advocates HCCC No.
853 of 2002, the advocate failed to conduct a search. The advocate was sued and his defence was that “ In
any event, you my client could not have been in a position to complete this transaction because the plaintiff
had failed to secure requisite finances” Kasango J dismissed the suit. (!)
There are instances where interest in property will pass without formal methods of conveyancing being
followed. E.g.
Statutes of Limitation dictates if a party is in possession of property continually for a period of 12 years and
such possession is adversely exercised with the intention of excluding the whole world from claiming an
interest to the property, the court is under a duty to declare the party the owner of that property and that
the judgment is a judgment in rem.
If you represent to a party that the party can exercise such rights on your property to be deemed an owner
of the same and relying on your representation that party acts to his detriment, the court is under a duty
through the principle of proprietary estoppel to declare the party as the owner of the property.
In the case of Teng Hwan v Swee Chuong [1992] 1 WLR 11, two brothers bought land jointly in their names
and registered them in their father’s name as a trustee. The defendant began construction on the plot 3
years later. The plaintiff encouraged him to continue and consented to the construction. He also indicated
that he would surrender his interest to the property defendant in exchange for a plot that did not exist. The
defendant completed the construction and took full possession. When the father died, the plaintiff moved
the court and sought his share of the property or money in lieu thereof.
The defendant counter claimed for a declaration as the sole owner using the shield as proprietary estoppel.
The Privy Council held that the plaintiff was estopped from denying the defendant title and ownership to the
entire property even though the arrangement was from the word go unenforceable, as there was no
consideration.
(c) There are possibilities of conveyancing unregistered property through a special power of attorney which
you register. The power of attorney would states that “ In the case City Council decides to give title, you
have the power to get title to the property.
You can also transfer property based on a letter of allotment on conditions that:
- The allottee has satisfied the conditions in the allotment by making sure there is a
correspondence file for that piece of land in the land’s registry.
Much of it is drawn from the English. In the case of Nyali Ltd v AG [1955] 1 All ER 646 Denning LJ stated
that you can transplant an English Olive in Africa but you must never expect it to thrive with the same
foliage and green as it does somewhere in Manchester or England.
Page 3 of 46
We have borrowed heavily from the English but we are duty bound …
Up to 1535, the transfer of interest in land in England was by primitive method of surrendering the property
to the Lords and they in turn granted the property to your nominee. There were no formalities and no
records.
By 1535, the Lords’ role was set out and consequently if there was to be a transfer, he prepared a note or
an assurance known as the foeffment stating that the transferor had given up his right over the property to
whoever wanted to secure the property. There was no registration of the same. Delivery was accomplished
by a ceremony known as delivery of ceisine (?) of the property itself in the presence of all the feudal lords.
After 1535, the first statute relevant to conveyancing was enacted. Before this you could partition property
or swap property.
In 1535, the Statute of Uses was enacted by Henry the VIII. The purpose of this statute was to mitigate and
stall losses that the Crown was incurring because the feudal lords decided they could also trade on the
property.
Prior to 1535 the land would be owned by the Lords and produce owned by the state. The Statute of Uses
introduced the principle that any property owned was to be transferred “ unto the use of the transferee and
subject to the right of the crown.” This ensured that any transfer had to be drawn in a particular way.
In 1536, the Statute of Enrolment was enacted with the purpose of keeping the feudal system. It endorsed
the regulation that each conveyance had to be sealed by the Crown and enrolled within six months with the
Chief Lords.
In 1677, the Statute of Frauds was enacted. It required that all conveyancing documents had to be by way
of deed and in writing, sealed by the party transferring the property before three or more credible
witnesses. This has continued to date.
The Real Property Act 1845 and the Vendor & Purchasers Act of 1874 introduced the regulation for the
transfer of property by way of prescribed forms.
In 1925, the Law of Property Act (later the RLA in Kenya ) was enacted for the purpose of simplifying
conveyancing/transfer and dealings in land. It abolished particular forms of conveyancing in land simple
basic and straightforward forms introduced. It also abolished various forms of interests and estates in land
and kept only freehold and leaseholds. All land was to be conveyed by way of grant.
In Kenya, we developed our conveyancing along the English model. Prior to 1901, the Englishmen who were
the only ones who could own land did everything.
1. In 1901, the Registration of Documents Act was enacted. It dictated that (Section 4) any document
transferring an interest in land had to be registered within one month of transferring it. It did not
grant any title to land and no forms were prescribed.
2. The Land Titles Act 1908 – it was intended to apply to the coastal areas. It produced the concept
of adjudication. The natives at the coast had begun conflicts over land and the adjudication
process was meant to resolve conflicts and record with the recorder of titles who the owner was.
3. The Government Lands Act of 1915 – it was meant to control the interior hinterland. It introduced
the deed plan - a document drawn by a qualified surveyor for purposes of identifying each parcel
of land. It also introduced a systematic approach to registering ownership in land. If the
government alienated land and gave someone it would be by way of grant or indenture of lease
and would be registered.
4. The Registration of Titles Act of 1920 (Cap 281) – It intended to get rid of the previous Acts. It was
based on the Torrens System and emphasized proper systematic registration of title and proof of
Page 4 of 46
registration of title. It guaranteed registered title & prescribed for the first time statutory forms to
be used in conveyancing. Title documents are a Certificate of Title or a Grant.
5. The Registered Lands Act (Cap 300) - it provided for mandatory statutory forms to be used in
conveyancing. It simplified conveyancing. Title documents issued under RLA include a Certificate of
Lease, a Title Deed and a Land Certificate.
The RLA had clauses which made title indefeasible notwithstanding even proof of fraud to protect
colonialists who were remaining behind after independence.
LESSON 2
BASIC REQUIREMENTS IN CONVEYANCING
1. Documentation
This is the requirement of writing, which finds its origin in section 3 of the Law of Contract Act. There are
other semi formalities e.g execution of the document, attestation of the execution, verification of the
execution process and other statutory requirements.
Why is it that section 3 of the Law of Contract Act and section 97 of the Evidence Act demand that a
transaction relating to land must be in writing?
To ensure certainty, as land is unique: therefore in case of disagreement, the remedy of specific
performance may be available.
Land is very unique as a merchantable item, consequently it is important that any fraudsters who
may wish to get it quickly or fraudulently; the Statute of Frauds 1677 specifically provided that the
requirement as to writing was to guard against any fraudulent dealings.
The formality as to writing performs a forensic function in providing simple yet conclusive evidence
of the fact of an agreement.
Land besides its socio-economic effect and the ability to attract fraudsters and rogues, also has a
variety of uses reflected in the many different kinds of interest that one particular piece of land
could provide. E.g. Parcel A of land, which is a freehold, could be leased and subsequently
mortgaged. The mortgagee can thereafter sell the same. The evidentiary function of writing is not
the fact of agreement but the content of the agreement. Therefore writing performs the useful
evidentiary function in encouraging precision and recording such precision for posterity.
It has also been stated that writing performs the protective function of giving the proprietors of
land an opportunity to think again before dealing with this very unique item.
Qn: With our modern day strict rules of evidence do we still need the forensic function against
fraud in the LCA which was largely drawn from the statute of frauds of 1677?
The British revised the Law of Property Act in 1989 and we followed suit with the amendment of the LCA in
1991 (coming into force in 2003?) – prior to then, one could either enforce a contract if agreement was in
writing or oral and part-performed – the latter was removed and this hampers courts from exercising equity
which treats as done that which ought to be done.
NB// The agreement must be in one document but there is an allowance for cross-reference e.g. there is
often reference to the LSK Conditions for Sale 1989
2. Registration
This is the keeping of records of land transactions in a land register. What is kept is a notification not only of
the existence of a particular parcel of land but also of any other interest, duties, liabilities touching on that
particular parcel of land.
b) It enables the Government to keep track of the use and ownership of all parcels of land. This
is evident in the 2005 legal notices relating to RLA & RTA land i.e. requirements as to PIN
numbers, photographs etc. also to keep track of taxes
c) Registration provides certainty and security of title to owners or registered proprietors of any
parcel of land. Because of such certainty, the user of such a parcel of land is able to use it to
acquire mortgage facilities, trade etc.
d) Registration simplifies dealings in land within the best framework of land law, especially with
RLA e.g. one can easily trace the root of title.
e) Registration vests in the registered proprietor, be he the first proprietor or a subsequent
proprietor following a transfer he gets an indefeasible title as against the whole world
including the government. Registration is effected or done at the relevant land registry.
Note:
If land is registered under the RLA the operative statute is the RLA.
If registered under the RTA the operative statute is the ITPA.
If it is registered under the GLA, or the RDA, the substantive law is the ITPA
For Procedure:
RLA is governed by the RLA
RTA is governed by the RTA
GLA is governed by the GLA.
If land is registered under the RLA you will look for the register under the RLA created by section 5 of the
RLA. Section 5 of the RLA authorizes the Minister of Lands to create Land District Registries.
NB// There is need to overhaul section 5 and give directions on how district registries should be created as
the current ones have been abused by incompetent staff.
Section 4 of the RTA provides for registries to be created by the President himself. Therefore there are only
2 RTA registries i.e. at Nairobi and at Mombasa. There is a need to get all parcels of land are registered
under the RLA.
Section 93 of the GLA provides for the creation of a Government Lands Registry at Nairobi. The GLA
Registry is a creation of the statute. There are currently two GLA registries i.e. at Nairobi and at Mombasa.
The RDA by virtue of section 4 provides for the registration of an intended interest in land within 2 months.
However it does not pass any interest despite registration. E.g. Registration of a sale agreement.
There are two RDA registries i.e. The Principle Registry at Nairobi and the Registry at Mombasa.
Qn. Identify the relevant registries under the different statutes.
A photocopy of the document that has been registered is kept in a deed file. (Each particular parcel of land
has its own deed file). The deed file is relevant for the purposes of tracing the root of title as it is presumed
that the deed file has all the title records. The deed file should list everything in its history from the original
grant by the Monarch of England
Any registration under the RTA will be prefixed with the initials I.R (Inland Registry - Nairobi) or C.R
(Coastal Registry – Mombasa).
Page 6 of 46
Under the RLA, there is a slightly improvised system of registration. It is only under the RLA that there is a
proper register (the form is in the 1st Schedule of the Act).
Section 10 of the RLA dictates that each particular parcel of land must have its own register. The RLA
register has three sections:
The registration under the RLA is two fold in certain instances. The actual register is kept in the District
Land Registry. The register is either a green card or a white card in the District Land Registry. When
documents are registered entries are entered in the cards. It is advisable upon registration to ask for a
search to ensure that the registration has been effected. The document may have been signed but entries
not made. This is especially so because there is no requirement under the RLA that entry be made in the
copy of the title.
The Registrar keeps in the parcels file the document that has been registered. Unlike the RTA and the GLA,
under the RLA the Registrar keeps the original document. The owner goes away with the duplicate. Note
that the register is the mirror image of the parcels files.
What is Registering?
Land will always belong to the government (hence the doctrine of bona vacantia). It is not the land that is
registered as this is done once the grant is issued. It is an interest, or the liability of a duty that is
registered. These interests include:
1. An Allodium
This is the highest interest in land after the land itself. This describes a situation where real property is
owned free and clear of any encumbrances including liens, taxes or charges.
The Crown is prohibited from interfering with such land. This is found in some states like Italy (the Vatican
i.e. ecclesiastical states. Note that after the 9-11 terror attack, the US enacted The US Patriots Act entitling
the state to acquire any land. Therefore an allodium no longer exists in the US.
The land is owned without the Government interest interfering until there is nobody to inherit. The doctrine
of bona vacantia will apply and the land will revert to the state.
3. Leasehold
This is an interest for a specific term where the grantee and the lessee are given the property to own and
possess exclusively at a premium for the determined term. A leasehold can create another leasehold (sub-
lease) or the leasehold may also be created from a freehold.
Encumbrances are created by the registered proprietor in favour of a third party which results in the
registered proprietor’s rights being limited e.g. A charge requires the consent of the third party before
transferring, inhibitions and restrictions are also encumbrances.
Servitudes are not necessarily created by the registered proprietor on their own parcels of land. They are
created for the interest of third parties on others parcels of land e.g. easements and restrictive covenants.
Easements could be created by statute
Tulk v. Moxhay
2 Phillips 774, 41 Eng. Rep. 1143
Court of Chancery, England, 1848
Tulk v. Moxhay
Court of Chancery, England, 1848
2 Phillips 774, 41 Eng. Rep. 1143
Per LORD COTTENHAM, LC: If an equity is attached to property by the owner, no one purchasing with
notice of that equity can stand in a different situation from that of the party from whom he purchased.
(1848) CB 430 (HL). The owner of land in Leicester Square had convenanted with neighbouring landowners
to `keep the park uncovered with buildings'. At common law, the covenant was enforceable only between
the original parties to the covenant, just as a contract would be. When the land was sold, the purchaser
wished to build on it, despite his knowledge of the covenant. It was held that it would be inequitable to
allow him to do so. This established that the burden of a covenant which was restrictive in nature (see
RestrictiveCovenant) could `run with the land', despite privity of contract. For the burden to run, the
covenant had to `touch and concern' the land, rather than being for the benefit of a particular person, and
it had to be intended that the covenant bind the land.
Note that this principle applies only if the covenants are restrictive, not positive, and this is a matter of
substance, not form, To `keep the park uncovered' sounds like a positive obligation, but in substance it is a
prohibition.
Prior to this case, for covenants to run, the original agreement had to be made by a landlord and tenant at
the time that they entered into the lease, that is, there had to be privity of estate, also called "horizontal
privity." The Court noted that if the agreement had been a contract instead of a covenant, it would have
been enforceable. Therefore, the Court decided that the covenant was enforceable at equity, that is, when
the plaintiff seeks an injunction as opposed to damages. The case stands for the proposition that horizontal
privity (privity of estate) is not required for the burden of a covenant to run at equity. In order for the
burden to run, the covenant must satisfy certain requirements: (1)It must "touch and concern" the land.
(2)The original parties must have intended that the burden run. (3)The party to be burdened must have had
notice of the covenant. (4) The party to be burdened must hold or acquire some interest in the property
that the original promissor held.
LESSON 3
Registration is what gives effect to conveyancing. Other effects of registration of title or of a person as the
proprietor of land under the GLA and the RLA include extinguishing communal land ownership.
Under RLA section 143 gives the registered proprietor of land an indefeasible title notwithstanding fraud
or mistake such that even a forged conveyance…
Section 20 states that absolute ownership is subject to the provisions of the RLA. The interest passes
subject to the provisions of the Act. The interest is only subject to priority rights.
Page 8 of 46
Registration is done by filling in the appropriate forms and lodging them at the appropriate registry. The
registration lodged first takes priority over that lodged later in time. Registration gives one an absolute
interest subject to any registration lodged prior to that registration. I.e. the doctrine of priority, documents
are ranked according to the time they were booked for registration. The interest is made subject to the
existing encumbrances.
In the case of overriding interests, although not registered, they are recognised. They are all such
encumbrances; rights interests and powers not entered in the register but subject to which dispositions that
are registered are to take effect. See: National Provincial Bank Ltd v Hastings [1954] Ch 9.
Section 30 of the RLA provides for overriding interests. Customary law rights are however problematic. It
has been held that one’s registered interest is subject to customary rights.
See: Mbui v Mbui EA 2005 256 where the court of appeal stated that registration does not extinguish
customary law rights. In this case, the son who had been in occupation of the land sued his father who was
trying to stop him from transferring 2 parcels of land registered in his father’s name under the RLA. His case
was dismissed but he continued occupying the land. His father sought to evict him on the basis that his son
had threatened him. He also appealed on the basis of being the registered owner of an absolute and
indefeasible title. His son argued that he was entitled to the land as a birthright under Kamba customary
law.
The court held in dismissing the appeal that the father’s right although absolute was still subject to the
rights and encumbrances noted in the register. It also held that such right was subject to overriding
interests, which included customary law rights giving rise to a trust that arose from the son’s continued
occupation of the land.
It is important to find out if there are any overriding interests existing under customary law when conveying
land. This may involve a physical examination of the property to see who may be living on it. You could also
obtain an indemnity from the seller guaranteeing that there are no overriding interests. This could be
included in the sale agreement. Note that the issue of overriding interests has not been tested against the
rights of a mortgagee or chargee.
See: Barclays Bank v O’Brien which held that in mortgages, if the wife does not obtain independent legal
advice, then an issue as to the validity of the mortgage arises. She can lay claim to the property.
Note that if you are able to show that you have an interest in property as a wife, the courts may treat you
favourably. See: Kivuitu v Kivuitu and Echaria v Echaria [2007]
Question: In light of the provisions of sections 32 and 33 of the RLA, is it correct to state that it is only
registration that gives one ownership rights in land?
Registration of property by way of grant or title has the effect of bringing land under a particular
substantive law. The law applicable depends on the applicable land regime under which the property falls.
GLA, LTA and RTA have their own procedural law but rely on the ITPA for the substantive law. For the RLA
land, the applicable procedural and substantive law is the RLA. This is also important in determining which
instruments to draw.
Note that section 163 of the RLA excludes customary law rights and or other rights accruing under
customary law. See also section 164 on mortgages and charges.
Registration has the effect that any document registered under any regime constitutes conclusive evidence
of the interest availed or passed by that instrument unless it is proved otherwise in a court. The fact of
registration speaks for itself.
40 RLA on the compulsory registration of leases for more than 2 years. The document is not
void but is invalid i.e. it works as between the two parties (interpartes) but not 3 rd parties.
The proprietor’s rights in rem remain unsecured if there is no registration. This would apply to charges.
See: Merali v Parker [1956] KLR 26
Clerk v Sombi [1963] EA 107
In the case of Rogan Kamper v Grovenor [1977] KLR 123 where Grovenor attempted to rely on a
clause on a draft registered lease. Rogan Kamper said since it was not registered it was not applicable. It
was held the unregistered lease operated as a lease inter partes but not against a 3 rd party. Therefore
specific performance was ordered.
Both the RTA and the RLA were amended and section 38 of the RLA states expressly that any transaction
executed by both parties will not be void but operate as a contract inter-parties. Section 32 of the RTA
also makes it statutory right for unregistered instruments to confer some rights as between the parties.
Registration is effected by filling out the necessary documents required to be presented for registration and
presenting the document to the relevant land registry. Registration takes effect from the time you book the
document and therefore you must identify the applicable law as well as in the land registry to beat the
doctrine of priority. Do it in the correct registry. RLA registries are in every district.
If it were a conveyance by a company, it would also have to register the instrument at the company
registry. Section 96 of the Company’s Act states that the registration of the property is complete when it
is registered at the company’s registry. This was to guard against fraud, insolvencies etc. The same applies
for charges and mortgages.
For co-operative societies, lodge the charge or mortgage with the Registrar of Societies.
Question: Is the Torrens System still relevant as it was intended to be especially in view of the overriding
interests, encumbrances etc?
1. It may not be as accurate as there are instances of double titles being issued
2. There is the issue of overriding interests which are superior to those of the registered proprietor
3. The documentation under RLA and RTA is cheap and simple as compared to the Deed system
The RLA and the RTA apply the Torrens System.
Question: On a proper construction of section 32 and 38 of the RLA and RTA rights concerning land have
no proprietary quality unless registered. True or false?
Cap 533 expressly provides for their availability and regulation. They participate in the negotiations at a
commission. Their role is to identify parties to a conveyance. They should never take up the advocates’ role.
They should not draw the conveyance or hold the deposit or carry out the search.
You need to ensure that the estate agents you are dealing with is registered mainly because if something
happens the client will come to you and you could be sued for negligence.
With regard to deposits ensure that you hold it but if the estate agent holds it you must ensure that he is
registered. Chapter 533 provides for how much fees an estate agent is entitled to as commission. If he
wants more you must advice your client accordingly for example the estate agent may be given the option
to purchase the property.
Page 10 of 46
Try to avoid getting involved with the estate agent because you end up negotiating the terms, which is not
your work. If you are the broker your duty would only be to source the buyer and leave the parties to
negotiate.
As an advocate and a conveyancer one can also be recognised as a broker and is entitled to earn his
commission when he brokers a deal i.e. sourcing a buyer. See: Article 27 and 30 of the Advocates
Remuneration Order. This has been brought to doubt by the CA in Wacira Wambugu v Rajeep Housing
Development when it stated that CAP 533 is very specific as to who can be a broker.
In Mapis Investments Ltd v Kenya Railways Corporation CA 14/2005 the court was very clear that
it is only a registered estate agent who can earn a commission
1. What happens when an estate agent misappropriates the deposit (if unregistered, the contract
cannot be enforced???)
2. If a registered estate agent, does one hold the money deposited as a stakeholder or as an agent?
3. How much is the Estate Agent entitled to under the Act? If the estate agent wants to charge
excess, can he be given the option to buy??
4. Do not enter into the realm of the estate agent. Do not negotiate the terms of the contract and
vice versa
LESSON 4
In conveyancing it is never advisable to act for both parties. You ought to discuss with the client whether
you are authorized to disclose details and information about the transaction itself and related details e.g.
existence of a mortgage or source of finance to a third party.
One may need to disclose in order to expedite the transaction. Authority should be sought prior to this
disclosure. One may disclose information that is beneficial to the other party and detrimental to your client
e.g. property costs one million yet the borrower borrows two million. Disclosure in this case may lead to the
advances being cancelled. See Mortgage Express Ltd v Bowerman and Partners (1996) 2 All ER
836
If you are acting in a conveyancing transaction and you come upon information that may jeopardize one
party, then as an advocate you are under an obligation to disclose such information. An advocate acted for
both the lender and borrower in a mortgage transaction. He became aware that the borrower was buying
the property from a party who was acquiring simultaneously with selling it but at a significantly reduced
price. The borrower defaulted and upon foreclosure, fetched a very low price. The bank sued the advocate
for negligence and breach of duty. The advocate was held liable. Sir Thomas stated as follows:
“Where a solicitor acting for a purchaser and lender receives information common to both.
The question whether he should pass it to one of the clients or other or both or neither,
depends on the relevant interest of each client which the solicitor engaged to serve.”
At the initial client interview, you also want to take details regarding the financial implications of the
conveyancing transaction e.g.
- if a sale transaction, whether the client has the 10% or whether he can get it within the period
stipulated
- whether your client is obtaining a mortgage to finance the purchase
- stamp duty payable
- an advocate must always discuss his legal fees at the initial client interview. It is advisable to
discuss this last after setting or advising the client
- an advocate must ask for a copy of the title documents at the initial client interview
- you may also discuss any other miscellaneous issues
- follow up the interview with a letter confirming the instructions as well as the details of the
interview. One must also confirm fees but at an approximate value
INVESTIGATION OF TITLE
Without a good title there will be no conveyance. Why do we investigate title?
1. Prudence demands that you investigate anything that you want to acquire. By investigating title, it
gives you an insight of the property you intend to buy or take as security
2. All land principles have the principle of a bona fide purchaser for value without notice who acquires
a good title. If you investigate title it will inform you whether there are any encumbrances hence
bona fide or not.
3. The caveat emptor principle demands that the buyer is responsible for checking the quality as well
as the suitability of the property he intends to acquire.
4. Investigation of title is not only confined to the registry or title deed alone but also extends to the
physical structure of the property e.g. merchantable quality
NOTE: The caveat emptor principle has its own exceptions. Latent defects for instance must be disclosed by
the seller. These are defects which though existing are not manifest or active or developed and would not
be revealed upon reasonable inspection e.g. dry rot, crack covered by paint. Patent defects are visible and
stand out. Adverse planning decisions, unregistered encumbrances etc are latent defects
A. SEARCHES
A search is the purposeful inspection of the title records or register records at the relevant lands registry
with the primary purpose being to identify or detect an adverse entry on the title or the register itself. There
are a variety of searches to be conducted but the modern conveyancer is more concerned with a search
under or at the Land Registry, Company Registry, Survey Department etc. The search should be conducted
at the relevant land registry i.e. the registry where the property is registered e.g.
GLA – Nairobi or Mombasa
RLA – The District Land Registry itself.
There are two types of searches:
b) Personal/Unofficial Search
Here one undertakes the inspection of the title records or register by oneself upon request via prescribed
form. You inspect and peruse the title records or register oneself.
Page 12 of 46
In October 2005, the Commissioner of Lands and Chief Lands Registrar abolished personal searches as
documents were disappearing. This decree was issued notwithstanding statutory provisions. The other
reason was that documents were being mutilated. This was ultra vires. This year, the LSK complained and
the Commissioner said personal searches may be conducted by lawyers only.
If you personally peruse a file, you are able to get so much information, such as the root of title etc
Under the RLA, the official search has its own advantage. S.144 of the RLA provides indemnity where one
relies on an official search to his detriment as long as one is not a party to any such fraud or defect. The
equivalent section does not exist under the RTA and GLA.
S.43 of the RLA (sterility provision) states that if you apply for an official search with the intention of
transacting and with the authority of the registered proprietor, no registration can take place for 14 days
from applying for the search. There is a stay of 14 days, the title becomes sterile, and no registration can
occur.
NOTE: There is a mischief however where one authorizes successive searches, the title may be sterile
indefinitely
A personal search enables one trace the root of title. In carrying out a search, one looks for:
1. Issues regarding ownership
2. Issues regarding tenure/interest of property
3. Special conditions imposed on the property especially a leasehold
4. The user, whether commercial, residential etc
5. The existence of any adverse entries e.g. encumbrances on the title, cautions in the case of RLA
and caveats in the case of the RTA
See: Gitwany Investment Ltd v Taj Mal Ltd & 2 Ors HCCC 114 of 2004 (Unreported)
Lenaola J. relied greatly on the correspondence file in making a finding on who was the rightful owner of
the land. The case involved double allocation of land. There are two confusing aspects as Lenaola talked
about RLA when the land was registered under RTA. There were two deed files yet there was only one
correspondence file.
Skyviews Properties Ltd v The AG & 2 Ors HCCC 1622 of 2001 (Unreported)
Ojwang’ J. relied a great deal on the correspondence file to determine the issues raised.
Once you are through with the search you should inform your client of any adverse entry. You should then
clarify with the other side whether the transaction can proceed or not. You should satisfy yourself that
whatever adverse impacts/entries revealed will not adversely affect your client e.g. if there is a mortgage,
whether the sale price will clear the mortgage in full.
Other Searches
1. Companies registry
Page 13 of 46
2. Survey Departments
3. Local Authority – discloses zoning/development policies of land. Urban planners and surveyors can
carry out these searches. This is especially important when you know what use is to be made of
the land
A search at the companies registry will reveal whether the company still exists, whether there are insolvency
proceedings etc
A local authority search will reveal any adverse proposals e.g. advice to the Government of compulsorily
acquiring land for public purposes
CHALLENGES IN SEARCHES
1) Unavailability of deed files or “missing titles”
2) Mutilation and destruction of files and documents in the files
3) Delays with regard to search results. You need about seven clear working days before you get them
4) Unavailability of Land Registers to sign your searches i.e. lack of efficiency and skilled manpower at
the Land Registries
5) Slow pace of computerisation
Significance of Searches
1) Failure to carry out a search may lead to the failure to register a document e.g. because of the
existence of encumbrances
2) The vendor may turn out not to be the owner of the property. This can be discovered by a search
3) The title document may be a forgery
4) The above errors occasioned because of omitting to carry out search may lead to negligence suits
against you
Letters of Allotment
This come from the Government through either the Commissioner of Lands or the Local Council if it is
Council Property. It is risky to deal with a letter of allotment e.g.
1. Most have stringent conditions which if not complied with within the stipulated time automatically
revokes the letter of allotment
2. One may carry out a historical search on land being allotted on the general file i.e. zone file and
correspondence file etc. in carrying out a search on the basis of a letter of allotment look out for
planning conducted e.g. by the Local authority. Look for the Part Development File (PDF) which
should be properly prepared and signed by the Chief Physical Planner and Commissioners of Land
NOTE: The CA has held that unless a letter of allotment is registered it is not recognised.
LESSON 5
B. PRE-CONTRACT ENQUIRIES/ PRELIMINARY ENQUIRIES
These are those enquiries made to the seller or he who is parting with an interest with the intention of
seeking or eliciting information not covered by the searches and information touching on the physical
stature of the property.
When posing the contract questions ask relevant questions. Ask questions for instance about the tenants or
occupants in the premises, the terms of their occupation or tenancy, enquire about any physical defect
touching on the property which the vendor may be aware of but on the face of inspection of the property is
not easily detected.
Ask about the developing prospects of the neighbouring properties. Whether there has been any boundary
changes in the last few years. The vendor is under no duty to reply but if they reply, it must be accurately
i.e. a reply one can rely on. Therefore, as a conveyancer do not give anticipatory or stereotype answers.
If one gives inaccurate answers, the recipient who relies on them can claim damages and if the contract is
already signed, one may rescind the contract. The recipient has a right to sue in tort for negligent
misrepresentation where the answers are inaccurate. The UK have a Misrepresentation Act but there is
no such equivalent in Kenya. In Kenya, however, it has been held that proximity and foreseeability can be
extended to contract.
Page 14 of 46
Capano Industries Case: Extended the doctrine of proximity and foreseeability to where it is just and
reasonable for one to be held liable even where the duty is owed.
An advocate should not step into the shoes of his client and give answers on his behalf unless authorized.
See: Gran Gilato v Wycliffe … Ltd & Others
The plaintiff paid £30,000 for an under-lease for 10 years. He thereafter spent £100,000 renovating and
shop-fitting the premises to manufacture and sell ice-cream. The head lease contained a break clause if
there was a requirement for re-development by the head lessor. The break clause required a 12 month
notice.
Before the grant of the under lease the plaintiff’s advocate sent to the second defendant (advocate for the
first defendant) inquiries before lease i.e. precontract inquiries and sought to know if there were any rights
affecting the superior leasehold title which would inhibit the enjoyment of the premises by the plaintiff in
accordance with the draft sub-lease. The advocate replied that there was nothing of the kind to the best of
the lessors knowledge. Five years after the service commenced, the break clause in the head lease was
exercised. The plaintiff claimed damages against the head lessor and the advocate for negligent
misrepresentation in view of the inaccurate answer at pre-contract inquiries.
It was held in the course of a normal conveyancing transaction, the seller’s advocate did not owe the buyer
a duty of care when answering enquiries before contract because a buyer has a remedy against the seller
for misrepresentation. However, if the advocate took steps out of his role as an advocate and accepts
responsibility towards a third party then he owed independent duty.
C. REQUISITIONS
These are such queries or objections to the title which come as a result of one’s inspection of the title
document qua title documents. Things to look out for are:
- Whether the document has been properly executed and witnessed e.g. if a company as
opposed to an individual (common seal in the presence of two directors, whether there is
a proper power of attorney in place)
- Whether the proper stamp duty on the document was paid
- Whether there are any particular encumbrances or adverse interests enforced in the title
e.g. Grants always have conditions and or limitations
It is upon investigation of title documents that requisitions are sent out. Requisitions are often directed at
the vendor or seller. Ordinarily, requisitions are sent before contract is executed. However, there is no harm
in sending the same after the contract has been executed. This authority is given by the LSK Conditions of
Sale, Condition No.10
NOTE: Good practice dictates that requisitions be sent out before execution
Example:
b) Is the signature the proper signature of the executor?
c) If execution is by a company, ask for the mode of execution of the company and a copy of the
Memorandum and Articles of Association. If a foreign company, and the MEMARTS are in a
different language ask for a legal opinion
d) Ask about the identity of the property
NOTE: There is no format for requisitions
An answer to a requisition just as in pre-contract enquiries if it turns out to be inaccurate, the recipient will
be entitled to rescind the agreement, or if damage caused is not so substantial, he may proceed with the
agreement and seek remedies in damages.
Requisitions are also very important when you are acting for lenders i.e. mortgagees or chargees having to
exercise the statutory power of sale. If there is a defect in the title document, one can go to court and say
the title was defective therefore property cannot be sold.
Page 15 of 46
Upon receipt of requisitions, an advocate should consult with his client however, unlike pre-contract
inquiries, one is under a duty to advice his client. Do not give stereotype answers.
PRELIMINARIES IN CONVEYANCING
These include:
- Execution and attestation of documents
- Verification of signatures of the persons executing the documents
- Payment of stamp duty
- Obtaining clearance certificates
- Obtaining the requisite consents
- Registration
The MEMARTS may dictate whether the seal alone is enough execution or if a director must also sign. A
problem will arise under the RTA which requires at s.59 that he seal must be witnessed by two directors.
Q: Under s.3 of the LCA should the person seeking to enforce be the only one to sign? Yes, it limits
execution i.e. agents not allowed.
S.109 RLA dictates that for an interest to pass, both parties must sign the document unless the registrar
decides to exempt one party. The RTA does not have a mandatory provision for both parties to sign the
document. It is only the person disposing the interest. However, in light of s.3 of LCA both parties must sign
the conveyance.
Attestation
This is the witnessing of the execution. Attestation should occur when one sees the fact of signing. Under
both RTA and RLA. RTA s.58 states who ought to attest documents i.e. Judges/advocates if in Kenya;
notary public if in the commonwealth; mayor or chief of city in which document has been executed
(commonwealth); consular general
In the RLA, there is the requirement of verification under s.110 which requires that the signatory to the
document appears before the registrar or before the person attesting the signature.
NOTE: In view of LN No.146-153 of 2005, the LTA, GLA and RTA requires the availability of one’s PIN No. ,
Identification documents (passport or ID) and passport size photograph of the person signing. This in effect
is to bring in verification (impliedly). This was aimed at circumventing the fraud at the Lands Registry.
Stamp Duty
This is basically a form of revenue collection by the Government by selling either revenue stamps or the dye
(red), the Government is able to raise revenue. Stamp duty is provided for under the Stamp Duty Act (Cap.
480)
Under s.5 of Cap 480, every instrument relating to property in Kenya, if it is provided for that stamp duty be
paid in the Schedule to that Act, will be assessed and the required duty must be paid as a legal
requirement. See 1st Schedule to the Act for instruments in conveyancing that will fetch stamp duty. S.6 of
Page 16 of 46
the Act says that duty must be paid within 30 days of execution of the instrument or if executed outside
Kenya, within 30 days of receipt in Kenya. Failure to pay duty means an offence has been committed.
However, the Government instead of exercising the Penal aspect of the Act will levy a prescribed penalty.
See: ss.26 & 113 SDA, S.20 also has penalty for late payment
S.111 of RLA states that no document will be accepted for registration unless the required duty has been
properly paid. The amount payable is dictated by the Minister of Finance and is usually stated in the Budget.
The duty is assessed on the instrument if it is a transfer on the basis of the value of the property i.e. ad
valorem duty
- Within municipalities and cities – 4% (urban land)
- Outside municipalities and cities – 2% (agricultural land)
For leases it is based on the annual rent for which the property is leased. Therefore you may need to
present the documents to the Office of the Director of Stamp Duty who assesses the stamp duty payable
i.e. the lease is examined for assessment.
Stamp duty is paid directly by way of Banker’s cheque to designated Banks. You fill in a Stamp Duty
Declaration Form.
Mortgages attract 0.2% duty of the amount being borrowed and for discharges 0.05% of the amount
borrowed.
The value relates to the property itself and not the fixtures and fittings. Fixtures and fittings ought not be
included. However, the requirement that no property will be registered unless the value is declared by the
Chief Government Valuer has led to fixtures and fittings being included.
S.95 & 96 of the Stamp Duty Act. On adjudication and exemption of stamp duty where there is a
restructuring of sister companies therefore they only pay nominal duty
S.106 deals with exemption from payment of stamp duty by the Minister of Lands
What is the purpose of the SDA if it stagnates conveyancing? This therefore raises the need for reform e.g.
1. Exempting stamp duty in the purchase of first houses
2. Family companies being exempted from duty (it was done in 2007)
CLEARANCES
There are two types of clearances in conveyancing i.e.
b) The Rates Clearance Certificates
c) The Rent Clearance Certificate
It is issued by Local authorities for charges for water bills, sewerage etc when paid
Other charges to the L.A. would include water and if a leasehold, the Local authority may insist on rates. A
rates clearance certificate is the document that will satisfy the registrar that all rates have been paid. The
certificate must be valid as at the date of registration. S.33 (2) RTA has an equivalent requirement of a
rates clearance certificate.
One applies to the Town Clerk for Land Rates Clearance Certificate.
the Rent Clearance Certificate. This is usually issued by the Commissioner of Lands and on behalf of the
Central Government after payment of all rent due and any applicable taxes.
Previously payment was made to the Commissioner of Lands but from 2006, Land rent is payable to KRA
(Comm., of Domestic Taxes) but the Comm., of Lands issues the certificate. This has led to delay as the
KRA has to confirm outstanding amounts from the Lands office. It applies to all documents/transactions as
long as the property is leasehold.
CONSENTS
This depends on:
a) Where the property is situated
b) The tenure or estate one is dealing with
Any transaction in respect of agricultural land must obtain the consent of the LCB. This requirement is set
out in s.6 of LCA. The original purpose was to control the user and conveyancing of agricultural land e.g. to
avoid constant subdivision, avoid ownership by foreigners or companies where the majority shareholding is
by foreigners.
NOTE: The LCA provides that even dealings with shares in a company that owns agricultural land ought to
be sanctioned by the LCB
- In the case of a transaction where you are inheriting the property, you don’t need to appear before the
LCB
The form used to apply for consent is Form 1 of the Schedule. The consent is issued by the LCB which is
established to cover land within which your land falls.
You must appear before the LCB and make your application. It will ask several questions before issuing the
consent. The consent is then extracted i.e. the letter of consent which you will present together with the
transfer. The letter should be signed by the chairman of the LCB
If consent is denied you could appeal to the provincial LCB. Final right of appeal lies to the High Court
where you can seek judicial review
Does the LCB consent lapse? Especially if you do not register the transfer?
It does not lapse. No such provision in the Act
Most of the time when one applies for this consent, one is required to pay cess to the Corporation before
being granted the consent. The Deed Plan to most properties reveal a Railway Line running through some
parcels of land. This consent would be in addition to the LCB consent if applicable.
1. These consents are required to complete any given transaction. In the absence of these consents
the conveyance e.g. lease, mortgage etc will not be registered
2. Condition 16 of the LSK provides that for purposes of completion, all necessary consent must be
obtained by the vendor/lessor (he who is parting with the interest). In most agreements in
practice, the person obtaining the interest is given a duty to assist in obtaining the consent
especially where both parties presence is required.
3. If the consent is not availed or obtained one will be held to be in breach. Unfortunately, the person
who is aggrieved has remedies in damages only. There is no room for specific performance
because as long as the consent is not given within the specified period, the agreement lapses
The CA held that the establishment of a trust is a disposition of property within the requirements of s.6 LCA
and the LCB consent was necessary. Having not been obtained within the required time i.e. 6 months, the
whole disposition was void
Bosire J said:
“The lack of statutory consent at the expirty of the 3 months makes the transaction void for all purposes
until then there is only a de facto agreement which has no legal effect”
SALE AGREEMENTS
1. What is the position of the vendor and the purchaser?
It has been stated that the vendor becomes the trustee for the purchaser between the time of
execution and completion of the sale agreements. Do statutes support the statement?
2. What sort of sale agreement is acceptable to my client? A simple agreement or a complex one with
damages etc
In the case of short/simple agreements, one leaves himself open to implied provisions and the
courts mercy. The complex agreement covers more issues. There is no statutory requirement for
the format of a sale agreement.
One may opt for a hybrid agreement, not too simple and not too complex depending on the
circumstances. Do not include irrelevancies.
3. The agreement must comply with any statutory requirements. These include:
(a) The Law of Contract Act (s.3)
(b) Other statutes will vary depending on the circumstances
4. A sale agreement is a contract and one must ensure that the agreement is in tandem with all the
Law of Contract principles of:
- offer and acceptance
- intention to be bound
- consideration exchanging hands
- the contract is certain
Under the statute, there are three basic requirements that relate to the form of the agreement: Cap 23 –
Law of Contract Act (s.3)
(i) The agreement for sale of land to be enforceable must be in writing. This applies to all
dispositions of interest in land.
(ii) The agreement must not only be signed by both parties but the execution must be attested/
witnessed in the presence of the person attesting. This requirement runs across e.g. for a
charge includes attestation of the facility letter.
Where do you sign?
Practice dictates that you sign at the end but since the purpose of the execution is to
authenticate the document it can be anywhere as long as it is witnessed.
(iii) The terms of the agreement ought to be in one document – s.3 seems to allow incorporation
of terms by reference. Although the reference is in the one document. In the UK, there can be
more than one document.
An agreement must at whatever cost be certain. If agreement is not certain even if one complies with
statutory provisions the agreement will be void. See:
Muchira v Gesima Power Mills Ltd (2004) 2 EA 168
The COA held that any agreement that contains uncertain clauses is void and specific performance or
reliance on it for any remedy will not be allowed.
Facts: The vendor sold land to the purchaser for 10 million. The parties themselves drew the agreement.
The execution was witnessed by a qualified advocate. 10% deposit was to be paid on execution, 20% later
and balance within 90 days or when the title was produced in the purchaser’s name. Possession was to be
granted on completion or when 20% was paid. Inter alia damages on default was 40% of 10 million. The
purchaser alleged default and sued for 4 million.
Held: The CA held that the agreement was not enforceable even though it had met all the statutory
requirements. There was no consensus ad idem as there was no clear provision as to when the balance and
possession would be given. The agreement was uncertain and specific performance could not issue.
NOTE: Why didn’t the court get rid of the uncertain provisions?
It did not have a ‘saving clause’ in case of inconsistency
S.55 of the ITPA provides that in the case of an open contract (which does not have various terms) the;
1. Vendor is under a duty to disclose any defects to the property that he is selling (i.e. latent but not
patent defects)
2. Vendor must also produce the title documents for purpose of inspection and not delivery
3. Vendor is under an implied statutory duty to execute the conveyance or the transfer in exchange
for the payment of the purchase price which entitles one to move to court for specific performance
4. Vendor will pay all outgoings and discharge all encumbrances registered against the property
5. Vendor is under a duty to take care of the property after execution of the sale agreement and
before the completion takes place. This includes the management of the property, ensuring that
reasonable repairs are undertaken on the property and ensuring that there are no squatters or
trespassers on the property (one need not improve the property unless the contrary is provided
for)
The sale agreement is ordinarily prepared by the Vendors advocate because the vendor dictates the terms.
See:
Salim v Okong’o (1975) KLR – Duties of Vendor’s advocate
The vendor’s advocate then sends the draft to the purchaser’s advocate for perusal and confirmation of the
terms in that sale agreement
Prior to drafting one must have obtained all the details relating to the parties from the vendor
Engrossment (reducing it into a formal legal document) before registration
1) You must ensure you get the correct addresses for purposes of sending out notices
2) On particulars of sale, define the property and the interest to be sold. Both physical and
legal description should be given. Leave nothing to interference. Also define the
interest/tenure sold e.g. freehold, leasehold etc. You must indicate the correct LR Number
You must also indicate the position on encumbrances i.e. the property is sold free of encumbrances. If there
is an encumbrance, you must indicate who is to service the loan/discharge the encumbrance. You must
state that the purchase price will be used to offset the balance of the encumbrance/loan. Avoid allowing the
clause “sold subject to all encumbrances…”
Ss. 2 and 3 RLA provide for sale of land plus that which is attached to it. A fixture is something affixed to
land by a human (not like a tree). You must find out if property is being bought including the fixtures and
fittings i.e. they do not attract stamp duty. If you do not, the vendor may argue that he is entitled to
remove the fixtures and fittings.
You could have a schedule listing out the fixtures and fittings being bought indicate the value of the fittings.
The transfer should have a price less the value of fixtures and fittings.
Wake v Hall [1882] AC 195
Blackman J stated “the degree of annexation is what matters”
Page 21 of 46
Special Conditions
These are those conditions which apply sui generis to each agreement. They are being extended to mean
the variations of the general conditions. For this reason it forms a separate part of an agreement.
Examples
- where the contract price includes the value of the fixtures and fittings sold separately
- where the fact is that the property is sold subject to a mortgage
- where the fact is that the sale agreement is conditional upon the vendor receiving duly sealed
letters of administration or probate
A sale agreement (if the LSK conditions apply) will be completed within 42 days of obtaining consent. This is
a special condition which varies the general conditions of sale.
General conditions
These are general terms which apply to open contracts with the intention of regulating the rights of the
party e.g. the right to rescind, give notice, take possession etc Any conditions varying these terms are
special conditions.
Special conditions
Sui generis clauses
Variation of general conditions
Capacity
Legal competence for a person to sell e.g. if selling as an attorney, administrator, agent, beneficial owner
Completion documents
That is the purchaser is to deliver the purchase price and the vendor is to deliver the completion documents.
The date of completion must be stated i.e. time is of essence.
Provide for place of completion usually at the vendor’s advocates office.
Where there is a financier, a professional undertaking is given instead of the money/cheque
One also has to state vacant possession
Completion documents include title documents, Clearance and Consent certificates, executed transfer,
photos, consents, stamp duty valuation forms
Assignment Clause
That is the transfer of the whole interest in the property. This is also referred to as the conveyance clause in
a sale agreement. Assignment may be of the transfer or of the obligations and rights of the parties.
Default Clause
On omission or failure to perform a legal or statutory duty under the contract. This clause addresses what
happens in the event of breach e.g. in case of default, a party will pay a specified liquidated amount in
damages
NOTE: Stamp duty is usually paid by the person acquiring the interest
Commissions should be given negative obligations i.e. the vendor shall not be liable for any commissions
whatsoever
Disclaimer
Provides for under the LSK Condition 14 clause 5. It embodies the caveat emptor doctrine i.e. buyer
beware.
It is the equivalent of an exclusion clause stating the vendor shall not be called upon to point out
irregularities in the property. (Q. Whose interest is being protected? One needs to inspect the contract and
carry out pre-contract inquiries)
General
One needs to put any general obligations in this clause. One may put saving clauses, how and when
payment is to be made, whether the amount would be net or gross. One may also include a clause on
whether the agreement, if it is to be varied, should be varied in writing or any other way.
Intention to be bound
This is a conclusion to the agreement where the parties are of one mind. It is just before the execution
clause. It is the parties affirmation to the contract especially in relation to the law of contract act.
Execution
This is the affixation of one’s mark on the document. It may be by way of signature, thumb print or a duly
appointed attorney of a company or by a common seal. The parties have to authenticate the document.
One must state the capacity in which the parties are executing the document.
Page 23 of 46
DEPOSITS
There is no general law requiring the payment of a deposit. One may argue that a sale agreement is a
contract and for it to be valid there has to be consideration. However, a sale agreement is only executory
and does not require consideration.
However, over the years, parties have always paid a customary deposit of 10%. Indeed the LSK condition of
sale 10 states that the deposit shall be 10% of the purchase price. However, one may have a sale
agreement providing that no deposit is required. A deposit is however included by most conveyancers as a
form of commitment and to go round the illiteracy of most court registrars who will refuse to record a
caveat where there is no deposit.
Qn: What happens if the stakeholder mishandles the deposit or becomes insolvent?
NOTE: It becomes an issue of agency and the person who appointed the stakeholder suffers the
consequences:
- If vendor, he should complete as well as going after the stakeholder
- If purchaser, he should pay another deposit
Deposit can also been held by an agent to the order of the person who appointed him. If the vendor
appoints the agent, the amount can be forwarded to the vendor at any time upon request. If the purchaser
appoints the agent, on request the agent can refund the deposit.
NOTE: If the agent mishandles the deposit or becomes insolvent, whoever appointed him bears the
consequences.
A sale agreement is treated as a guarantee because of the issue of forfeiture. If the purchaser is in breach
of the agreement, the vendor is entitled to exercise its right of forfeiture over the property (i.e. entitled to
deposit)
NOTE: The courts generally do not help. However refunds may be ordered:
1. If it has been agreed that despite any breach the deposit shall be refunded;
2. If a court of equity as in Dojap case orders that the deposit be refunded despite default or refuses
to grant specific performance to the purchaser but instead orders a refund of the deposit;
3. If the vendor himself is in default and is unable to complete;
4. If it is not an earnest security i.e. paid simply as part of the purchase price and is expressly so
stated e.g. payment by installment
Page 24 of 46
NOTE:
1. One can suggest reforms e.g. to reduce the amount of deposit to 5% and to only exercise the right
of forfeiture where specific damage or loss is proved
2. Another reform is to have some form of insurance for the risk taken
To get the interest one needs to register a transfer after paying the requisite stamp duty. The purchaser
needs to also pass some consideration to the vendor. This process of exchanging of some consideration is
called COMPLETION. The vendor completes by handing over possession while the purchaser completes by
giving the balance of the consideration. This is the final chain of conveyancing. It is however bilateral,
concessional and concurrent. Key phrases on completion are:
1. The date of completion
2. The venue of completion
3. The deliverables (completion documents)
4. The obligations of either parties at completion
Date
1. This will have been provided for in the sale agreement. If not, it is deemed that completion will
take place within a reasonable time from the date of completion.
2. If not provided but LSK conditions will apply. Then condition 2 will be applicable i.e. to take place
42nd day after date of completion but where LCB consent is required, 42 days from obtaining the
said consent
The period before completion is very critical because it is the time the parties:
1. Prepare or satisfy their respective conditions and obligations under the agreement
2. The issue of where the risk of property lies arises. The risk should be balanced between the parties
to ensure the property stays intact.
LSK Condition of Sale 23 – Insurance of property by vendor during the sale agreement negotiations. If not
insured by vendor and property is damaged in the interim, purchaser has the option to complete transaction
and claim damages or to rescind the agreement altogether.
If the property is insured, even if there is damage, the purchaser cannot rescind, he must complete.
This is not a fair provision since it will operate against the purchaser’s interest if he wants to charge the
property.
Date of Completion
When provided for in the sale agreement, it is just a target date for completion BUT if it is provided in the
agreement that the time for completion is of the essence you must complete on the completion date. If you
are in breach, the innocent party may rescind it.
All parties must therefore adhere to the date and deliver what they are required to. Failure to
deliver/complete is a fundamental breach both in law and equity and party at fault will not be allowed to
seek specific performance thereafter.
The phrase time is of essence may be implied in a sale agreement if the parties intend that time be of the
essence.
Berkley v Messenger [1989] 3 All ER 492
Contract simply provided that if purchaser failed to pay balance of purchase price on a given date the
agreement would be null and void.
Page 25 of 46
Jessel MR held: time was of the essence, stating that there was no better way of strongly expressing that
fact than as had been provided.
When time is not of essence, failure to complete on completion date does not entitle the aggrieved party to
rescind the agreement. He can only do so after issuing a completion notice to the party in default. The
notice to complete, the moment it is issued it makes time of the essence.
Completion venue
Usually at the vendor’s offices or his advocate’s office. If the vendor has mortgaged property, completion
could be at the Mortgagee’s or his advocate’s office. This is where it is not provided in the contract.
At the venue at 2.30 BOTH parties must be ready to complete. Purchaser delivers balance of purchase price
and the vendor is expected to give vacant possession. The deliverable in this case is the key of the door to
the property. Possession is de facto control where you hand over to the purchaser i.e. the right to access
the premises and exercise full use and control over the premises
1. For purposes of conveyancing you need to ensure that the property is free from all physical
impediments (Your client should visit the place and confirm this)
2. The property must be free from occupation
3. The vendor’s advocate also gives assurance/ the conveyance/ the transfer duly executed and
registrable. Inspect the transfer to see that it is executed and attested and refers to the property
being sold. It should be in the correct form depending on the registration regime i.e. RTA, RLA
The other deliverable is the requisite consent(s) e.g. LCB, Commissioners. Others are the Land Rent & Rates
Certificates, the original title deed and any other document in the contract.
NOTE – If you get a power of attorney from the vendor you will be able to deal with the property pending
registration of the Transfer. Therefore include this power of attorney as a deliverable document in the sale
agreement
When you receive the deliverable, inspect them and confirm that they are valid documents which you can
use. If you do not do so, your client can sue you for negligence if the transaction does not proceed.
Once you confirm that the documents are registrable and can confer a valid title to the purchaser you then
deliver the balance of the purchase price or an acceptable undertaking where the transaction is being
financed by a financier.
In practice however, the transaction is completed by one party sending a deliverable on the undertaking
that the other will give delivery of his deliverables i.e. postal completion.
In postal completion, vendor’s lawyer becomes the purchaser’s advocates agent i.e. he has the duty to
inspect the completion documents and confirm that they are in order and registrable and the cheque for the
purchase price can now be given to the vendor (i.e. the cheque was in vendor’s advocates possession)
LSK Condition 4 – When the purchase price is paid to the vendor’s advocate he should hold it as a
stakeholder for thirty days till registration of the transfer. On the 30th day he gives a notice to the purchaser
Page 26 of 46
for him to register the transfer within 30 days. After 30 days he gives a 7 day notice after which he releases
the cheque to the vendor.
If the property is subject to a mortgage finance, the transfer will be registered by the vendor’s advocate. He
also hands in the Mortgage deed to the vendor which will be used to effect registration.
Shaw v Foster [1872] 5 All ER 321
On constructive trustee vis-à-vis purchaser and vendor
Rayner v Preston
Openda v Khan [1984] KLR 208
Auctions
They could be private or public. In private auction, only a limited group of people are invited to buy the
property
The bid given does not amount to a contract until it is accepted by the knocking down of the hammer. S.3
of the Law of Contract Act does not apply
The issue of bona fides applies i.e. seller under an obligation to fetch the highest price possible
Ss. 12 & 11 of the Restrictive Trade Practices & Monopolies Act prohibits bid rigging.
TRANSFERS
They are what gives the purchaser the right and interest conveyed/purchased. The sale agreement of itself
does not convey an interest in land. See S.54 ITPA & s.3 RLA
Openda v Khan
Sale agreement creates no interest over the property
The transfer is always drawn by the plaintiff’s advocate save in very exceptional circumstances e.g. in
mortgages and subleases
Salim v Okongo [1976] KLR 42
LSK Condition 24 – Transfer can be drawn by the purchaser’s advocate. The drafting responsibility is then in
a way passed to the vendor’s advocate when his approval is so sought. Purchaser’s advocate ensures the
purchaser really obtains the interest in land sold.
Forms of transfer
This depends on:
a) statute applicable
b) interest to be transferred
For RLA land, forms are prescribed which are mandatory under s.108 and schedule 3 of the Act. You must
use these forms unless you prepare your own form, pay the requisite fee and obtain consent from Registrar.
Under RTA, s.34 provides the form which is NOT mandatory and you can adjust it mutates mutandis. It is in
the form of a deed. It does not matter that the interest is a leasehold or freehold, neither does it matter
that the person transferring is not the registered owner.
Under the GLA and LTA, these are simple deeds in the form “conveyances or assignments”.
A conveyance refers to a document used to transfer an interest registered under GLA or LTA which interest
is a freehold.
An assignment refers to a document used for purposes of transferring an interest registered under the GLA
or LTA which is a leasehold interest.
Page 27 of 46
In drawing the deed of conveyance or transfer you can convey different properties. Under the RLA the
transfer of lease forms allow one to transfer 1-5 and 6-10 properties respectively.
You may also include properties registered in RTA and RLA in one deed as long as you obtain permission
from the Registrar of Lands. You ought to be careful with the use of precedents. Do not use them blindly.
Consideration – This refers to the exchange given by the purchaser for the interest in land that he is
receiving. It could be monetary or otherwise i.e. another parcel of land therefore a deed of exchange.
Consideration is important because:
a) It is not a voluntary deed and as demanded by the law of contract, one is suffering to part with
something for what they are receiving. Matters as between the Government and parties.
b) It avails:
The remedy of specific performance
It helps the government to determine how to charge
Particular transactions by the parties i.e. stamp duty, income tax
Receipt clause – this is necessary in the body of the deed or in the transfer deed as it enables the purchaser
and the purchasers successors in title if any (heir, legal representatives) to avail themselves of various
statutory and legal provisions. It is an acknowledgement by the vendor that he has received the
consideration (operates as a discharge for the purchase moneys). It avails to the purchaser and its
successors in title, the protection of a bona fide purchaser for value without notice especially as against
third parties.
Page 28 of 46
Operative words – these are words of the grant (transfer) and capacity of the parties to issue that grant. It
is the statement by the vendor of what he is doing by virtue of the deed e.g. “ the vendor as the beneficial
owner doth hereby grant and convey”
NOTE:
If transferring a:
a) Freehold GLA – convey and grant
b) Leasehold GLA – convey and assign
c) Freehold and leasehold RTA – Simply transfer
d) Charge document – Charge expressly
e) Lease - Issue a demise
f) Discharge GLA – Release and reconvey
Parcels clause – Technical term denoting the description in words of the property being transferred,
conveyed or assigned. It should be strictly accurate and includes sketchmaps, deed files etc. Includes
acreage of land. If the descriptions are too many you can describe them in the schedule and make
reference in the parcels clause. A misdescription of the property can be corrected by variation. Avoid
misdescriptions because vendor can play dirty making your right of rectification useless.
Habendum – maps out or defines the interest or the quantum of the estate that is being taken by the
purchaser. If it is a freehold being transferred or conveyed, you should state that you are giving it to be
held in fee simple. If it is a leasehold, there are limitations state expressly “to hold for a specific term e.g.
99 years, remainder of the term”
If it is an assignment, state whether you are assigning the balance of your leasehold tenure e.g. the residue
of your time, fifty years less the last 20 years etc (esp in GLA). Also put any limitations and restrictions e.g.
subject to easements, subject to payment of land rates
Covenants – A covenant is that agreement which not only binds the vendor but also binds his predecessor.
It details and declares all the covenants of the parties.
Testimonium – This is the part that now links the execution or the affirmation of the deed with the rest of
the document “IN WITNESS WHEREOF…”
Attestation/verification – the place where the parties sign or cause the common seal to be embedded. It
signifies the intention of the parties that the deed ought to become operative and it is consequently so
deemed when the parties execute the document. Legal Notices No.146 – 153 of 2005 require that when you
prepare a deed of assignment or transfer, you attach photographs of the parties
Note: The schedule strictly and ideally speaking out to be inserted between the testimonium and the
execution clauses to avoid fraudulent changes thereunder.
a conveyance executed by the estate owner. Only in this case, the vesting order is executed by a
high court judge.
The Trustees Act Cap 167 grants this jurisdiction to the High Court puisne judges (S.5-56 sets out
the various instances when a vesting order can be issued e.g. s.48 where the High Court has
ordered the sale of the property. Also applies where the court sells the property in execution of a
decree. Also where the court orders specific performance. It is applied for by way of an originating
Motion or Summons.
The person acquiring that interest prepares a vesting order and sends it to court for approval and
execution by a High Court judge. A vesting order is a transfer which is supposed to fetch stamp
duty. Also issued where the trustees are not acting e.g. refusing to subdivide.
b) Transmissions
These are transfers save that the interest in land/lease from one person to another is by an act of
or operation of the law. This will happen when:
Somebody dies
Somebody is declared bankrupt
The form that the transmission dictates is either an assent or a basic transfer of interest in an
estate by an administrator form. Assent applies when dealing with the estate of a deceased
person where the land is registered under the GLA, LTA or RTA. In the document, one’s title is only
as far as one is an administrator. RLA has a specific form for it.
c) Sub-leases
These are transfers or conveyances in their own rights. A sublease is basically a lease by a lessee
to a third party conveying some or all of the leased property for a shorter term than that of the
lessee himself. It is occasionally referred to as an underlease or even a lease. In the latter case, it
will happen when dealing with freehold property e.g. 999 years lease and given for 900 years.
Subleases have been in existence in Kenya since the late 1970s.
Characteristics of a Sublease
- The term to be granted in the sublease will depend on the headlease i.e. must be less than
the head lease.
- There is a management company that owns the property (land) where the sublease is
created. This company is registered under the Companies Act Cap 486. Its purpose includes
inter alia:
(i) managing the estate where this sublease exists
(ii) acquiring the reversionary interest where the subleases lie. It is the
management company that will then negotiate an extension of the lease.
- The owners of the sub-leases are entitled to a share of the management company.
Therefore, the sub-lessees own the reversionary interest itself by getting a share certificate
of the management company.
- The reversionary interest will vest in the management company.
- The building/architectural or site plans will be annexed to the sub-lease, properly marked
- Insist that the sub-lease has a clause/covenant that upon expiry of the term, the
management company or whoever is holding a reversionary interest will also give a similar
term automatically.
Under the sectional title, the format of the transfer takes the form of prescribed instruments under RLA.
Rationale: The substantive law recognised in Kenya is RLA
The Sectional Properties Act was enacted in 1990 to facilitate transfer of flats through mortgage finance.
The lenders objected to subleases as security because:-
d) The titles were dependent on the head lease by the Government or Head Lessor. Therefore, there
was some uncertainty as to whether the lease would be extended, if someone defaulted and the
Bank had to sell, it would be hard to get a buyer and extension wasn’t guaranteed.
Page 30 of 46
e) Even where extension was guaranteed, the terms of extension were unknown and uncertain
therefore not good security
f) There was a distinct possibility that the head lessor would fail to apply for extension of the lease
g) Also argued that subsistence of the sublease dependent on head lessor serving his obligations.
Nevertheless, a grant was essentially the same as a lease, so this argument did not hold much weight. The
misconception was based on looking at a sublease (not as title but) as a lease!
These arguments led to the adoption of the Australian condominium legislation on subleases. The effects
were:
1. The RLA became the substantive law and a sectional title could be issued to an owner of a flat
which was registered under the Sectional Properties Act. If property not under RLA, you would
have to convert it to RLA. Flats owned under the Sectional Properties Act have titles issued which
are equivalent to grants. They are issued to each owner of a unit.
2. Corporate bodies are also established under the Sectional Properties Act similar to a company
recognised under the Companies Act BUT with no registration formalities. It is a corporate body
and has some liability. The moment a sectional plan is registered corporate bodies are constituted.
A sectional plan is the document prepared by a qualified architect or surveyor which defines or
describes in a graphic form the units constituting the sectional property. S.4 of the Sectional
Properties Act provides for the process of preparing a title which commences with the registration
of the plan. Upon such registration the parcel of land register on which the property lies is closed
and a separate register for each unit opened. The corporate entity established upon registration is
identified by the name which name refers to the number of the sectional plan e.g. Sectional Plan
No.22
The main difference between subleases and sectional properties is ownership of property.
Termination of the corporate body is unanimously by all the members of the body or through the court (by
members unanimously agreeing)
PROFESSIONAL UNDERTAKINGS
Read Article by John Kibuchi
In the course of most conveyancing transactions it is common for advocates to enter into written
agreements to do or refrain from doing certain things. These are called professional undertakings.
These agreements help speed up the process of conveyancing. It helps circumvent problematic areas. From
a viewpoint of a professional it should be noted that:
1) An undertaking creates a legal obligation upon the advocate which is enforceable by courts by way
of mandatory injunctions and court orders. In this respect, the ability to enforce a professional
undertaking is vested solely on the courts. All courts over the world have a supervisory jurisdiction
over its officers. It is on this basis that courts can enforce an undertaking. [Link] CPA & Advocates
Act expressly allow the court to enforce an undertaking and make such orders as it deems
appropriate to enforce the undertaking e.g. order a fine, jail term etc
2) The giving of a professional undertaking by an advocate places on him an ethical obligation to
comply with the same i.e. undertakings are deemed sacrosanct. The LSK is usually the body
Page 31 of 46
concerned with ethical conduct of an advocate and this ethical side of undertakings gives the
undertaking its value. LSK can, if it finds you guilty of breaching an undertaking, fine you, suspend
you or even strike your name off the Roll of Advocates.
Definition of Undertaking
This is an unequivocal declaration of intention addressed to someone who reasonably places reliance on it
and made by an advocate or a member from an advocate’s firm in the course of practice or made by an
advocate as an advocate though not in the course of practice.
It is a promise made by the advocate to do or refrain from doing something. It does not matter what you
promise to do or refrain from doing you will be bound.
You must weigh whether the undertaking you give is within your control and you will be willing to honour it.
There is no limitation, the undertaking could be oral or in writing and it will still be binding and enforceable.
However, it is important to put them in written form so as to avoid misunderstandings on your part and on
the recipient’s part and for evidential purposes. Ensure that you are aware of all undertakings sent out by
members of your staff because you would still be bound.
Undertakings given on email may be risky since they can be easily amended and normally have disclaimers.
Faxes are fine.
Because the promise is given by an advocate he is personally bound by it even if e.g. your client dies or
becomes bankrupt. You must always consider if you have control over the undertaking. You may have to
give a qualified undertaking if in doubt of enforcement of the undertaking. E.g. I will pay you Kshs X upon
receipt of the same from my client. Also consider the conditions you impose.
Guidelines
1. Breach of an undertaking is prima facie evidence of misconduct – the LSK will expect the
enforcement as a matter of conduct. Failure to honour a professional undertaking is professional
misconduct. The LSK only expects that you honour the undertaking BUT it will not enforce the
undertaking.
2. Undertakings are normally expected to be honoured between the giver and the recipient only.
Undertakings are NOT saleable commodities. Neither the court nor LSK will be anxious to entertain
complaints by people who are interested in the performance of the undertaking but were not
recipients. However, the residual power to enforce the undertaking vests in the court and could
listen to a party who was not a recipient.
KCB v Adala – Enforcement of the undertaking is with regard and touches on the honour and
honourable conduct of the members of the noble profession. The court will not hesitate to allow
non-recipients to benefit from the supervisory jurisdiction of the court;
Naftali Radier v Njogu t/a Njogu Advocates & Co HCCC 532 of 2002; An advocate on the
other hand cannot assign an undertaking without the recipients consent
Ron Otieno v AGN Kamau & Co Advocates HCCC 134/03 – The defendant’s advocates had
given an undertaking under their former name which partnership had since been dissolved; when
the plaintiff sought to enforce the undertaking Mr. Kamau argued that a former partner Ms Kimani
walked away with some liabilities including the undertaking. Held: the undertaking was joint and
several i.e. personal to Mr. Kamau and he could not walk away from it
3. Undertaking must be certain. If ambiguous it will normally be construed in favour of the recipient.
This rule exists to prevent reconstruction of the undertaking by the giver to avoid obligations and
liabilities.
4. Proper wording of the undertaking is important because no extraneous evidence. No terms will be
implied/extraneous evidence allowed in an undertaking.
Karsam Lalji v P. K. Kimani t/a Kimani Kairu & Co. Advocates CA 135 of 1999
Advocate ordered to pay monies owed under an undertaking together with interest although no
interest was provided under the undertaking
Page 32 of 46
READ:
Kenya Finance Co v Ng’eny and Anor [2002] 1 KLR 106
5. An undertaking need not constitute a legal contract. It need not have consideration for it to
become enforceable. Principles of contract do not apply because there is an ethical obligation on
the giver’s part to comply. Question: When can you enforce an undertaking?
However, where consideration is disclosed in an undertaking, the giver of the undertaking is
discharged if the consideration fails e.g. “upon receipt of the sum of x/= from the purchaser, I will
release the same to you.” You will be discharged if the P does not give you the money or if the P
was to give the financier some money i.e. the undertaking becomes more of a legal contract and
the principles of contract apply.
6. An undertaking is binding even if outside the giver’s control. It demands of the giver to clarify with
the recipient as well as the client the nature of the undertaking you are about to give. Consider
whether you will be able to honour the undertaking when called upon to do so. It is no defence
that the undertaking cannot be met/honoured due to the death or insolvency of the client on
whose behalf you gave the undertaking. You must be able to control the outcome of the
undertaking. Always ensure you hold funds beforehand.
7. It is no defence that to honour the undertaking would be in breach of a duty owed to the client i.e.
an undertaking is personal and not subject to the whims of your client. This discourages advocates
from giving undertakings flippantly. You will also not be able to frustrate the recipient of an
undertaking who has relied on it by relying on change of events or circumstances to give an
undertaking for balance of the purchase price but this undertaking should only be issued and be
accepted where the purchase is being financed. You should not accept such an undertaking where
the purchase is not being financed. You need to establish this at the inception of the transaction
and you may include it in the sale agreement.
The purchaser’s advocate should ascertain that he has not only the balance of the purchase
price but also other disbursements like stamp duty and registration fees and any other
disbursements before giving an undertaking.
1. When you are acting for a redeemer bank (redeeming another bank’s mortgage) you give them an
undertaking that upon registration of the discharge by the redeeming bank you will give them the
redemption funds. You can only give it after the discharge has been signed.
2. If you are acting for a financial institution lending money to anyone i.e. upon registration of the
mortgage/charge you will release the loan. You must state that this undertaking is solely for the
benefit of the client you state the name of the client so that no one else can benefit from it.
Questions
1. Give four instances of undertakings.
2. On reforms, why do advocates deliberately fail to honour undertakings?
Should undertakings be limited to advocates with 7 years in practice since old advocates really respect them
but young advocates do not seem to respect them.
Mortgage
This is the conditional transfer of property to a lending institution or bank which transfer may become
absolute if the borrower falls into arrears or is completely unable to make payments as per the covenants
between the bank/lending institution. S.58(a) of the ITPA and the case of Santley v Wilde[1899] 2 Ch
474
The Master of Rolls Lindley “A mortgage is a conveyance of land as security for payment of a debt or the
discharge of some other obligation for which the land had been given.” You actually ‘convey’ your interest in
a mortgage.
Charge
On the other hand while a charge is also a security for money advanced, the property is neither conveyed or
transferred to the lender/bank. In the case of a charge, the interest will only be conveyed to the lender in a
very legal and abstract way after you have defaulted.
S.58 of the ITPA on forms of mortgages but for a charge there is only one legal form:
S.58(b) – A simple mortgage
S.58(c) – A mortgage by conditional sale
S.58(d) – A usufructuary mortgage i.e. you actually deliver possession of the property
Page 33 of 46
e) To obtain all the requisite consents if the same has not been availed by the borrower e.g. consent to
charge from the Commissioner of Lands, L.A.’s consent
f) Duty to confirm that the borrower has obtained independent legal advice i.e. its independent in the sense
that the certificate is from independent legal qualified advice. It is critical in a mortgage by guarantee i.e.
where the mortgagor is not the borrower, he is giving his property as security for the lending to a third
party. This is crucial because:
1. Most mortgagers say that they did not get the benefit of the loan/amount
2. Most mortgagors say that they did not know what they were doing.
g) Duty to get the lender to execute the charge or the mortgage document. Under the RTA it states that it
is sufficient to have the borrower’s signature. However, it is important to take into account s.3(3) of Cap 23
which requires both parties to execute the document.
h) To stamp or pay stamp duty on the charge documents and lodge the same for registration at the relevant
lands registry as well as the companies registry, where applicable i.e. the charge document is being created
by a limited liability company. See s.96 of Cap 486 dictates that unless a notice of charge created by a
registered limited liability company is lodged within 42 days of the date of its creation with the registrar of
companies, the charge will be void against the liquidator or any creditor of the company.
Lodge Form 214 within 42 days with the Registrar of Companies. In case of non-registration of the charge
document and the company winds up, the charge will rank pari passu with the unsecured creditors of the
company.
i) Complete the transaction by account not only to the borrower’s advocate but also to the lender.
To obtain all the requisite consents – This duty is ordinarily the borrowers but where there is failure, the
lender’s advocate must act.
Duty to confirm that the borrower has obtained independent legal advice – independent legal advice should
be sought from a qualified advocate. It is very critical especially where there is a mortgage or guarantee.
Where the chargor is actually not the borrower but is just giving his property as security by way of
guarantee. Also called third party mortgage/charge.
NOTE: Independent legal advice relates to the effect of the advocates certification of having explained the
effect of s.69 and the consequences or effects thereof.
To cause the lender bank or its attorneys to execute the mortgage/charge document – The RTA and ITPA
provisions seem to be of the view that it is okay for only the chargor/borrower to execute the document.
However, s.3(3) would raise difficulties as far as enforcement is concerned as it requires both the lender
and borrower or their agents to execute.
To pay stamp duty on the charged document and lodge the same for registration in Lands Registry as well
as the Companies Registry when applicable i.e. charge or mortgage being created by a limited liability
company. S.96 of the Companies Act indicates that unless a notice of charge created by a registered limited
company is lodged within 42 days of its creation with the registrar of companies, the charge will be void
against the liquidator or any creditor of the company. If the company goes into liquidation the chargee will
be ranked at the same level as unsecured creditors.
To complete the transaction by accounting not only to the borrowers advocate but also to the client (lender)
i.e. releasing the loan proceeds cheque and refunding excess fees if any.
2. To obtain all the necessary consents and clearances required for successful finalization of
transactions.
3. To release the original title documents to the lender’s advocate for purposes of completing the
mortgage transaction. This is usually after receipt of a professional undertaking that the documents
will be used solely for the purpose of registering the security.
4. To approve the mortgage deed or charge document as drawn because they are ordinarily standard
documents. One must advice the borrower on the effect of charging and mortgaging of his property
at this stage i.e. that default in repayment will result in loss of the property. A client should sign the
certificate that the explanation was given and understood. If there is evidence that such advice was
not tendered, the document can be declared null and void.
5. Duty to obtain adequate or enough funds for purposes of stamping or registering a mortgage or
charge document.
6. Duty to prepare the reconveyance or instrument of discharge if still seized of the brief.
This process is the same with a further charge and further mortgage (save for investigation of title) and
second charges and second mortgages.
Further charge
Borrower and lender always the same – RLA and RTA
Further mortgage
Same borrower and lender – GLA and LTA
Second charge/mortgage
There is a new party in the form of a second lender or financial institution advancing additional finances.
The second financial institution requires the consent of the first lender.
Note: Second mortgages and further mortgages have been questioned because the mortgage transfers the
interest in the first place and nothing is left save for reversionary interest.
S.108 RLA states that the forms under the Act are to be utilized but these can be varied with the approval of
the Chief Lands Registrar. S.65(1) RLA states that to create a charge you must use a specified form and
register it.
S.74 RLA dictate that the chargor/borrower must sign a certificate which must be attested that he
understands the effect of s.74 of the RLA on remedies on default. S.69 ITPA also states that the certificate
must be signed by an advocate certifying that he has explained to the borrower the effect of the mortgage.
1. Proper description of the parties, their addresses and the properties to be charged/mortgaged. This is
crucial especially when a need to exercise statutory remedies arises i.e. one needs to serve a statutory
notice to the borrower.
See:
Simiyu v Housing Finance Co. Ltd [2001] 2 EA 540
Ringera J held that where the plaintiff has shown a correct address and has alleged that she was not served
with the statutory notice, she was entitled as a matter of course to an injunction restraining the bank from
selling the property for lack of a proper statutory notice.
NOTE: Where the lender is in possession of several addresses, the best approach is to send the statutory
notice to the last known address.
2. The covenant to repay the amount advanced. This covenant should encompass the principal amount
advanced as well as any interests accrued or charged. Also include the redemption date. This is important
because in the event of default on the part of the borrower and the lender issues the statutory notice, sells
security and there is a shortfall, this covenant to repay will be the basis of suing for the shortfall. Without
this covenant, one cannot sue for the shortfall. Without this covenant, one cannot sue for the shortfall.
Qn: When does time start running for purposes of limitation of actions?
Ans: When there is default
The covenant is also an acknowledgement of the borrower’s indebtedness to the lender and will aid one in
moving the court to obtain summary judgment.
3. The covenant to keep the property in good repair and condition. The essence of a mortgage/charge is
security. If the property goes to waste, it is of no use to the lender. There is need to ensure this covenant
has some efficacy. This is attained by the inclusion of e.g. must be insured, right of chargee to enter and
inspect, the chargor to pay rent and rates, no alterations without the consent of the chargee/mortgagee, no
transfer or lease of the property and that the property shouldn’t be given as securing for another loan to
another party.
There is need to bind the borrower to pay taxes and rates etc
Charging Clause
This is the covenant that creates the security. Without this, there is no security i.e. ‘THE BORROWER
HEREBY CONVEYS, ASSIGNS etc”
The charging clause is not only confined to the property i.e. LR No X. One must go further and charge also
all improvements, fixtures and fittings in the property (Pattni Case)
Equip Agencies v. Credit Bank Ltd [2004] 2 EA 61
The charging clause didn’t include chattels fixtures and fittings. It was held that in the absence of a chattels,
mortgage or a debenture, the bank could not sell the chattels, fixtures and fittings but could only sell the
land.
Qn: What happens where amount is repaid, reconveyance executed and owner fails to collect title from
bank. Can you claim title after 12 years or is your equity of redemption no longer in existence?
Arises only after the mortgagor or chargor is in default and an appropriate valid statutory notice is
served upon him which notice is not needed. The mortgage or charge must be valid and
enforceable. The mortgagor is in default where the amount due is not paid on the due date. The
statutory notice on the other hand is considered not to have been heeded when the mortgagor
who is already in default does not pay the mortgage debt for three months after receipt of a notice
to repay from the mortgagee.
NOTE: The statutory notice demands full payment of the amount due. Any interim payments
whether received in good faith or on a without prejudice basis will not void the statutory notice.
See:
Eros Chemists Ltd v Trust Bank Ltd CA [2002] 2 EA 550
A five judge bench held that the wording of a statutory notice must state and give three clear
months within which payment must be made and thereafter only can the statutory power of sale
be exercised. The notice starts to run upon service of the same.
2. Under section 69 you can also exercise the remedy of selling the property if the borrower
defaults in paying interest for a period of two months or more without giving the statutory notice.
NOTE: Should you make a demand for the notice, it is deemed a statutory notice and one must
within three months.
3. It can also be exercised if the borrower is in breach of a covenant in the mortgage deed or
charge document. You must however also give notice of breach and a chance to correct the
breach.
The sale under the ITPA is ordinarily by public auction. However, it also allows one to sell by private treaty.
The choice is the lenders’. See:
Maranya v National Bank of Kenya Ltd [1995-98] 1 EA 177
The plaintiff argued that the sale was irregular and void as the defendant had sold the plaintiff’s charged
property by private treaty after the defendant had advertised to sell by public auction. The COA held that
s.69 of the ITPA allows the bank to sell by either mode and this statutory right cannot be taken away
merely because of early advert by public auction.
In realizing the security, the lender must exercise good faith even though he is not a trustee for himself or
borrower. Where there is carelessness, the bank will not be liable to recover the shortfall and will be open to
liability in damages. See:
Cucimere Brick Co. Ltd v Mutual Finance [197-] 2 All ER 633
Sajabi v Amreli Wala [1956] EACA 71
Good faith to be exercised even in private treaty sales.
B. APPOINTMENT OF RECEIVERS
Under the ITPA receivers can only be appointed after the statutory power of sale has arisen as
they must have the power to sell the property. The receiver is not the agent of the lender even if
appointed by the lender i.e. protects the interests of the borrower.
C. FORECLOSURE
This is the right conferred upon the lender under the ITPA to move to court and extinguish the
equity of redemption. Consequence – borrower/mortgagor ceases to have any interest in the
propery. It then matters not if good faith is not exercised. The remedy of foreclosure is expressly
established by s.80 of the RLA. This is because in a mortgage some interest is conferred whereas
in a charge there is no interest transferred thus no need to extinguish interest.
LEASES
S.3 of the RLA defines a lease as a grant with or without consideration by the proprietor of land to another
person to the exclusive possession of that land. S.105 of the ITPA states that a lease is a transfer of a right
to enjoy such property made for a certain time or in perpetuity in consideration of a price paid or promised.
NOTE:
A lease entails a transfer or grant of a right or interest in property for a limited period of time (RLA) or even
in perpetuity (ITPA) Exclusive possession. Whoever is granting the right excludes himself from interfering
with lessee’s possession.
The premium/price for lease is not an absolute essential. This is why s.3 RLA excludes it. Therefore an
arrangement which grants exclusive possession but does not provide for rent is still enforceable e.g. a
peppercorn
Period
The ITPA and RLA do not make clear provisions of the period. However, it is essential that the period be
certain. A conveyancer should consider period carefully becaused under RLA, if the lease is for more than
two years, for it to take effect in rem, it has to be registered. ITPA – lease over one year should be
registered.
Parties
Must be certain.
Grant
This is the transfer of the property for a particular period of time. The terms of the grant should be certain.
See:
Rye v Rye [1962] AC 496
Lord Denning gave instances of situations where you can grant a lease to yourself. JLO thinks it is not
possible especially a right of the principle of mergers of the --- interest. He gives instances of a firm of
lawyers who own property and lease it to the firm. The two essentials which distinguish a lease from a
license is:
- Exclusive possession
- A grant of the interest
A licence on the other hand is a mere permission given by the proprietor of the land to a licensee to do
some act in relation to the land which act would otherwise be deemed to be trespass if the permission was
not granted.
This distinction is also important because of the rent regime acts Cap 296 and 301 were intended to protect
tenants from scrupulous landlords. However, it has been decided that what matters is not just the document
but the actual happening on the property.
See:
Street v Moundford
In leases, the interest granted can be assigned to ---. In licenses if the permission given cannot be assigned
to a third party i.e. you cannot mortgage it, transfer or inherit it.
Examples
1) The lessor must covenant to give quiet and peaceful possession – ITPA
(s.108);RLA (s.53-55)
2) The lessor must also covenant not to derogate from the grant/lease as given to
lessee
3) The covenant that the premises is fitting for habitation. This is a covenant on the
part of the landlord.
The tenant (lessee) also has covenants expected of him. See:
s.64 RLA
s.108(b) ITPA
In drawing these covenants, the conveyancer should not be oppressive. He should ensure the interest of
both parties is catered for. In this regard, even though a covenant against sub-letting is included in the
lease, there is usually a rider that: “unless consent of the lessor is obtained.”
In the case of commercial properties, the leases will always be very detailed and include additional
covenants i.e.
1. The covenant to pay a service charge and to account for the same
2. A detailed clause on the limitation as to the user of the property
3. An insurance clause
4. Restriction on weights which may destroy the premises let
The covenant that limits the users of the property must be strictly observed i.e. if the premises are let as an
office you must use them as an office. The landlord on the other hand is also duty bund not to interfere if
you are using it for the purpose let to you.
2. To approve the draft lease which having been drawn by the Landlord’s advocate will be sent to
you. Read clauses, understand and explain the same to the lessee especially when you come
across unusual terms. See:
Sykes v Midlands Bank Ltd [1917] 2 All ER
An unusual clause was detected by a lawyer who did not deem it fit to explain to client. He was
held liable in negligence.
3. Ensure that all the disbursements are availed. These include: registration fees, stamp duty, legal
fees
4. Ensure the landlord obtains all the requisite consents
Termination of Leases
1. By effluxion of time
This is the expirty of the time stated in lease – s.64 RLA, s.111 ITPA
2. By giving of a notice
This must however be provided for in the lease document and also must indicate the period of the
notice. It is not necessary for leases for fixed periods.
3. By forfeiture
This refers to the determination of the lease by the lessor for breach of a condition by the lessee or
in the event of the lessee becoming insolvent. This mode of determination can be court assisted
i.e. asking the court to declare that the lease is terminated by virtue of the breach of the lessee.
Where the lessor does not act when there is a breach, he will be deemed to have waived the right
of forfeiture. An action must be taken within a reasonable period of time upon detecting breach.
4. Surrender
The lessee yields up his interest back to the lessor. It is usually done by mutual consent. If there is
no mutual consent, the lessor is entitled to claim his rent for the unexpired rent by way of civil suit.
S.63 RLA provides that the lease can be surrendered by writing the words “SURRENDER” on the
original lease document.
5. By way of a merger
i.e. a merger between the leasehold interest and the reversionary interest. The merger of this two
interests must however be with the same person.
-----
REMEDIES IN CONVEYANCING
As an advocate your advice is not limited to theoretical solutions i.e. statutory provisions. One must pick on
a relevant/correct remedy in practice. Every case must be considered on its own facts. The remedies in
conveyancing are four-fold i.e.
1. Statutory remedies
2. Equitable remedies
3. Common law remedies
4. Quasi remedies e.g. cautions, caveats, inhibitions, prohibitions
Damages
The issue is to ensure that the damages to be awarded are given as if the contract had been performed.
Value the property depending on the loss of bargain. The compensation is and must be intended to put the
aggrieved party in a position equivalent to that which would have existed if the contract had been
performed e.g. if the contract is performed and vacant possession is not given, damages will be limited to
the time you did not have vacant possession until when you get it.
Since these are common law remedies, you must mitigate your losses and not just wait for court to
determine. If the transaction is not completed advice your client that the party in breach must compensate
you. However, you must demonstrate that you were also ready and able to complete i.e. both of you have
to be in a position to complete.
If the above can be shown, when does the court assess the amount due to you?
Page 40 of 46
NOTE: the assessment is done on the day you go to court and the court will award interest to cover the
wasted years. Ringera J has however held that assessment must be as at the day of judgment.
Rescission
This is the right to undo the contract either through self help or with the court’s assistance. This right will
take place when there is evidence of fraud on the part of either party. Also when there is misrepresentation
which gets to the root of the contract e.g. a misdescription of the property to the contract which induces
you to enter into the contract. If it is not part of the agreement, you will not be allowed to rescind as you
would have inspected. When there is a defect in title which cannot be rectified on notice.
NOTE:
These vitiating factors must not be trivial.
Equitable Remedies
1. Specific Performance
As the appellation suggests, specific performance means to call upon someone to perform his part of the
bargain specifically with the assistance of the court. See:
Hasham v Zenab [1960] AC 316
The vendor tore the sale agreement immediately upon execution and having received the deposit. The
purchaser moved to court and asked the court to order specific performance. The vendor argued that he
had not sold two acres but only half an acre. He also argued that there was no evidence that he was going
to breach the contract. The privy council held that specific performance was the right remedy and analysed
it.
Since specific performance is an equitable remedy, all the maxims of equity will apply e.g. equity will not act
in vain e.g. if property has been sold or let; he who seeks equity must come with clean hands i.e. you must
not be in breach
A court of equity will not abuse equity i.e. act to affect another party entitled to an equitable remedy i.e.
with competing interests. The court will weigh the two interests and will not abuse that other equity.
Read:
Bullen & Leake on Specific Performance
2. Injunction
This is always sought as an interlocutory/cautional measure to stop e.g. disposal. Stops also attempted
breach. An injunction can also be a specific final measure e.g. where there is a breach of contract.
STATUTORY REMEDIES
1. Right of redemption
2. Foreclosure
3. Statutory Power of Sale – this cannot be taken away
4. Damages – RLA & ITPA especially where your property is sold to a bona fide purchaser for value
without notice s.69 ITPA
5. Rectification – Found under all the statutes; RLA (s.142), RTA (s.59), LTA (s.69), GLA (s.120) –
Ordinarily, this is a post completion remedy. It comes into play after the conveyancing has been
finalized e.g. you borrow 20 million but the charge registers 10 million, you can move to court to
ask for rectification of the title or even the conveyancing document itself. Object of rectification is
to correct a genuine mistake for accurate records. Rectification was originally to correct oral
mistakes and thereafter extended to fraud and correction generally.
6. Remedy under the Distress for Rent Act i.e. taking away items to activate payment.
7. Cap.296 Landlords & Tenants, Shops, Catering Establishments…Cap301
Caveats are lodged by any person who claims some defined interest in land capable of registration e.g.
mortgagee, lessee etc A caveat itself is an instrument which forbids the registrar from effecting any
Page 41 of 46
registration against the subject title absolutely or unless the transaction is expressed to be subject to the
claim of the caveator or as is required by the caveat itself. Caveats are bound under ITPA properties.
Cautions belong to the RLA regime. It is a requisition to the registrar requiring notice to be given to the
cautioner before a registration is made under any disposition by the registered owner of the land.
NOTE: Registrar can do something on title when a party other than the registered owner deals.
Consequently, it is important that when you lodge a caution, you routinely conduct searches on the title, to
ensure that the caution is in place. This is because the caution is limited to actions by the registered owner
only. The Registrar is not only bound to notify the cautioner e.g. by a JD action
In both instances, i.e. before you lodge a caveat or caution, you must support your claim by facts sworn in
an affidavit showing your interest which must be prima facie enforceable e.g. the claim of a scorned or
prejudiced purchaser.
A licensee can also lodge a caution. This is a way of protecting unregistered interests –s.131 RLA. A caution
will also be lodged by a petitioner in bankruptcy (s.131 RLA) to preserve the property. This is a temporary
protection that subsists until such time as one is able to convert this interest into a registered interest i.e.
pending litigation or settlement.
Thus, a caution can be very easily removed. It is often abused by the Lands Registry. If you lodge a caution
and the registered proprietor contests it, the registrar is under an obligation to notify you to remove the
caution and if you do not show cause of why the caution should not be removed, the registrar will remove
it. If you lodge the caution unreasonably then you will be asked to pay compensation to any person who
has suffered as a result of the caution. NOTE: the same applies to caveats.
Inhibitions and prohibitions are also same as caveats and cautions but are issued by the court i.e. a court
order stopping any dealings in land for a particular period of time or until another order is made.
Inhibitions – RLA s.128
Prohibitions – GLA, RTA, LTA
Distinctions:
1. Caveats and cautions – prescribed forms by individuals
Inhibitions and prohibitions – court order
2. Caveats and cautions – compensation if wrongly lodged
Inhibitions and prohibitions – no compensation
Page 42 of 46
Interests to look at are the shareholders of the management company; right of management company to
obtain the reversionary interest, provision for the formation of the management company and ownership of
the management company.
A developer will develop the flats using the buyer/tenant’s money therefore one has to look at the
contractual terms in relation to construction, completion date, whether it is feasible, whether other
construction work needs to be done or whether it is logistical.
Occupational certificates from the local authorities are crucial. They certify that the development is proper
within the jurisdiction of the local authority and are in accordance with the plans that were presented to
them.
Rectification of defects (defects liability period between 30 – 60 days) where the developer will repair any
defects noticed within that period at no cost to the tenant. In this clause, the client will retain a certain sum
to cover for the defects liability period
How is the level of progression audited especially where the developer is using your client’s money to
develop the flats? The sale agreement needs to provide for this auditing through qualified personnel such as
quantity surveyors who will not necessarily be the developer’s employees i.e. independent personnel
One also needs to check how much your client will pay upon the transfer of the reversionary interest. That
figure should be known before the signing of the agreement because if left out it can be hefty. It is usually
between 10,000 and 50,000.
The sale agreement also provides for some extra charges. However, there is no rule that states that the
buyer should pay the vendor’s advocates fees. If your client is going to pay, then it should be established
early in advance. (However, nowadays when it comes to buying of apartments there might be such a
requirement in respect of the fact that the vendor’s advocates will also handle the formation of the
management company and fee in respect of the same to the purchaser.) Other charges are electricity
deposit, water deposit etc (these amounts need to be the statutory amount), six months service charge
(security, caretakers fees, maintenance of car park, swimming pool, playground and gym etc) The service
charge ought to be audited by the management committee.
The sale agreement should provide for the amount to be paid by your client for his share in the
management company. This should not exceed Kshs.10,000. In relation to new houses, management
company does not apply however occupational certificates will apply.
(4) Purchase of land by way of shares in a Co-operative Society that owns land
E.g. In parastatals, Housing co-operatives
Page 43 of 46
Members own shares in a company that owns land. Cooperative societies can own land and it will be a
tenancy in common ownership. The important provisions will be how does your client own shares in that
company, the land, acreage and when subdivision will take place. An acquisition agreement between the
Co-operative and the Purchaser has been signed. The Co-operative must own the land in common. By virtue
of owning shares in the Co-operative society the purchaser will also own his share in the land in common
with other shareholders. Share certificates must be issued to members as proof of ownership. There is need
to do due diligence to establish the acquisition of the land and the affairs of the co-operative society and
company i.e. is the land overvalued? Overcharging of advocates fees? The share certificate should state the
shares owned by the purchaser.
The sale agreement should state who will bear the cost of change of user i.e. in most cases it will be the
purchaser. The vendor usually pays for the subdivision costs. One must be wary of certain things when
purchasing a commercial property:
- status of tenancy i.e. leases for 5 years or protected tenancies. This will affect possession
clauses i.e. is he taking the property with tenants (if so, should confirm the exact number of
tenants) or without tenants
- Are there fittings and fixtures? If so how does one craft the sale agreement?
Auction Sales
Also a purchasing situation i.e. where someone buys property advertised. An auction is a public or private
sale by way of an auction signified by fall of the hammer. It arises in two situations:
a) Execution order of court
b) Statutory power of sale
Auctions are governed by the Auctioneers Act plus the rules. Also the CPR apply i.e. O. XXI. The RTA & RLA
also have provisions for sale by way of auction i.e. by a Mortgagee/Chargee exercising a statutory power of
sale.
Requirements under Cap 23 as to execution of contracts by both parties do not apply. See s.3. A binding
contract is formed when the property is knocked down to the highest bidder and after the bid has been
accepted by that bidder. Sometimes the sale can be challenged e.g. where it is sold below the reserve price
or where the seller did not exercise good faith (or lender/auctioneer does not exercise good faith)
NOTE – The reserve price must correspond to the market value so as to demonstrate good faith
The terms of sale are dictated by the Mortgagee/Chargee. They are usually standard terms of contract
Where the sale is by an order of the court, the court sets the terms of the sale e.g. reserve price. If court
says the property must get the reserve price any sale below this is void.
Who can bid? The owner, other people can bid and the decree holder. The auctioneer must accept at least
10% of the purchase price as deposit or what has been set. Bidder must be ready to pay this amount at the
fall of the hammer.
Obligations of an advocate in this transaction include carrying out a search, carrying out a valuation to
establish if reserve price is proper, send out requisitions to Bankers, Lenders or Auctioneer so as to find out
if there are suits pending with respect to the property. You should also advice on the purchase price,
whether the deposit is to be forfeited etc
If you are acting for the bank, ensure it is acting in good faith i.e. you need to advice them to sell the
property at the best price possible that it can fetch. Any balance over and above what is owed should be
returned to the lender.
Page 44 of 46
Where the sale is by any other financial institution the proper procedures must be followed as per the
relevant statutes.
See. S.21 of the Auctioneers Act i.e. time, date and place of sale must be advertised in the newspaper and
whether the sale is reserved (i.e. private treaty) where there is no reserve price (public sale) the seller
should not bid. Property should be sold to the highest bona fide bidder if his price corresponds to the
reserve price
The Auctioneer must have a valid practicing certificate for that year because failure to hold such may render
the sale void.
Page 45 of 46