Scribd
Upload
3 views14 pages

CI/CD Infrastructure Optimization Plan

The document outlines an Infrastructure Optimization Initiative aimed at improving product delivery and reducing operational costs through a modern CI/CD architecture. It identifies current bottlenecks in the existing GitHub Actions and AWS CodePipeline setup, highlighting inefficiencies such as initialization delays and redundant processing. The proposed migration to a high-performance, self-hosted infrastructure using Jenkins promises benefits like instant pipeline starts, reduced build times, and a predictable cost model, ultimately empowering the engineering team to focus on solving business problems.

Uploaded by

Tri
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
3 views14 pages

CI/CD Infrastructure Optimization Plan

The document outlines an Infrastructure Optimization Initiative aimed at improving product delivery and reducing operational costs through a modern CI/CD architecture. It identifies current bottlenecks in the existing GitHub Actions and AWS CodePipeline setup, highlighting inefficiencies such as initialization delays and redundant processing. The proposed migration to a high-performance, self-hosted infrastructure using Jenkins promises benefits like instant pipeline starts, reduced build times, and a predictable cost model, ultimately empowering the engineering team to focus on solving business problems.

Uploaded by

Tri
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Infrastructure

Optimization Initiative
Accelerating Product Delivery & Optimizing Operational Costs through
Modern CI/CD Architecture

Presented by Tri Tran | Operations & Engineering


Current Operational Bottlenecks
The current GitHub Actions & AWS CodePipeline setup is
inefficient for our scaling needs.

Infrastructure Initialization Delays: Every build starts


from scratch, wasting 35 minutes just "warming up"
the system.
Redundant Processing: We rebuild the entire
application every time, even unchanged parts, due to
lack of caching.
Production Queues: Long execution times create a
"traffic jam," blocking subsequent critical hotfixes.

Impact:
20 minutes per Core Service build
10 minutes per Landing Page build
Business Impact Analysis

Financial Impact SLA Risks


Slow pipelines mean slow
Slow delivery cycle.
hotfixes. If a bug hits
Developer waiting time blocks
productivity. production, our Mean Time To
Unpredictable cost Recovery MTTR) looks higher
than it should because the
infrastructure slow.
The Jenkins Migration Strategy
Transitioning to High-Performance, Self-Hosted Infrastructure
Performance Benefits

No Cold Start: Server is pre-initialized → instant


pipeline start.

Fast Checkout: Local repo caching

Build Optimization:

Docker Layer Cache → huge reduction in


build time.

Library Cache (node_modules, vendor,


gradle, maven) → minimal rebuilds.

Key Feature: Instant Feedback Loops


Empowering the Engineering Team
Speed is a morale multiplier. By removing the "waiting
game," we keep developers in their flow state.

Focus: Engineers spend time solving business


problems, not fighting infrastructure.

Safety: Faster builds encourage smaller, safer code


releases.

Control: Direct access to build logs and environments


empowers the team to self-serve.

Notifications: Integrate with Slack


Cost Model Transformation

Legacy: Variable Cost New: Fixed Cost

Pay-As-You-Go Flat Infrastructure Fee

Costs scale linearly with activity. The more We pay for the server capacity, regardless of
successful we are (more builds), the more we how many builds we run. This encourages
pay. High unpredictability during crunch times. frequent testing without financial penalty.

$$$ Uncapped) $ Predictable)


Q&A
Thank you

You might also like