Evolutionary Theories: Lamarck vs. Darwin
Evolutionary Theories: Lamarck vs. Darwin
Lamarckism
The central premise of its
hypothesis revolved around
I return to two ideas
fundamentals:
Striving
and using it,
this animal
would achieve
develop your
neck. And
after
would achieve
transmit that
to his children.
1.-Lamarckism
2.-Darwinism
But...
Some not
they find enough
food or suffer
diseases and Others are the
they die capture of some
predator
There is a fight
for existence
Many are born...
But...
But...
Only a few survive:
those who have been born
with characteristics
that allow them
better adapt to
its medium.
Natural Selection has
eliminated those who were born
with fewer features
appropriate for the
survival.
Various
species of
finches
Cormorant
with wings Giant tortoises
atrophied
About the 'monkey' no. His theory on the evolution of man was
grossly misunderstood and found much opposition.
The attacks on Darwin's ideas that found the most
ecos did not come from their scientific opponents, but from
his religious opponents.
Many attacked
to Darwin without
having read your
The idea that living beings had
book of knowing to
evolved by natural processes background sus
denied the divine creation of man arguments and
and it seemed to place him at the same level ideas.
than the animals. Both ideas
they represented a serious threat
for orthodox theology.
Darwin did not think that the
man descended from none
actual 'mono', but the
man and other primates
they all descended from
common ancestors.
Orangutan Gorilla Chimpanzee Human being
? In times of
Darwin does not
they knew fossils
of ancestors
humans
Darwin thought that
the human being does not
? Ancestor
proceed from none common
actual primate.
But I did believe that
we have ancestors
common with them.
Orangutan Gorilla Chimpanzee Human being
Australopithecus afarensis
Modern Anthropology knows many more details about the
human evolution of what people think
Homo erectus
Evolutionary theories
3.-Neodarwinism or Theory
Synthetic of Evolution
None of the scientists who were betting
through the evolutionary theories I knew the
existence of the genes nor of the
mutations, but even then they intuitively knew that
the changes occurring in individuals of
a species "were transmitted" to the
descendants.
+ +=
Neodarwinism
or Theory
Synthetic of the
Evolution
The origin of species by Darwin was published in 1859, before Mendel's work.
Evolutionary theories
3.-Neodarwinism or Synthetic Theory of Evolution
The genetic recombination that Daddy duck meets mommy duck...
it occurs in meiosis and the
sexual reproduction produces
intraspecific variability
the one Darwin spoke of
... mother duck put ...and they had beautiful ducklings. But there won't be an opportunity.
eggs in the nest… for "the ugly duckling": Natural Selection will take care of him.
The duck
Malvasia
Natural Selection continues to be accepted as the dive for
the main "motor" of Evolution. Selection obtain
food
Natural 'chooses' within variability. from the background
of lagoons
evolutionary theories
3.-Neodarwinism or Synthetic Theory of Evolution
As you know, sometimes errors occur in DNA replication,
giving rise to altered genes, different from the original. They are the MUTATIONS.
ATTCGCGGCATTAATCCGATACCTAGTACCGCGGATTTAAACATGGATC
TAAGCGCCGTAATTAGGCTATGGATCATGGCGCCTAAATTTGTACCTAG
Double helix of DNA without mutation
ATTCGCGGCATTAATCCGATACCTAGGACCGCGGATTTAAACATGGATC
TAAGCGCCGTAATTAGGCTATGGATCCTGGCGCCTAAATTTGTACCTAG
Double DNA strand with mutation Mutation
Mutations are the original source of variability. Meiosis
and sexual reproduction are added sources of variability.
The number of
possible combinations of
alleles of genes in a
species is extremely high
("almost infinite").
of possible combinations
of dice figures
taking five of them?
evolutionary theories
3.-Neodarwinism or Synthetic Theory of Evolution
In this environment, the mice
of dark phenotype
they survive with more
probability