Sl No
1
2
3
4
4a
5
6
6a
6b
6c
6d
6e
6f
6g
6h
7
8
8a
8b
8c
8d
8e
8f
8g
8h
8i
9
Studies under POSOCO guidelines / Requested by SLDCs across country for
CON4 approval
Development of detailed Steady State Model of the plant (in PSS/E)
Load flow simulation of detail plant model
Reactive Power Compensation Analysis and capability curve generation at 0.95 l and 1.05
including additional cases at 0.975 pu and 1.025 pu
Development of equivalent Aggregate Model
Comparison of detailed model and equivalent model
Short circuit Analysis & Result Verification in accordance with IEC 60909-2001
Stability Studies
LVRT Test – Study performed at 25%, 50% & 100% of active power dispatch
HVRT Test – Study performed at 25%, 50% & 100% of active power dispatch
Operating frequency range (frequency control flag set in PPC model) – Study performed at 10%,
50% and 100% power output
Voltage Response Test (reactive power support capability)
Frequency Response Test – Study performed at 10%, 50% and 100% power output
Ramp rate test as per CEA recommendation – Includes both ramp-up and ramp-down scenario
Q set point test
Power curtailment response test
PSCAD Model Development – Equivalent/Aggregate model for dynamic studies & Benchmarking
Study Results (PSCAD model and PSS/E model)
Developing PSS/E equivalent model in PSCAD and benchmark flat run
LVRT Test
HVRT Test
Operating frequency range (frequency control flag set in PPC model)
Voltage Response Test (reactive power support capability)
Frequency Response Test
Ramp rate test as per CEA recommendation
Q set point test
Power curtailment response test
Power quality analysis – Simulated between 0%-100% plant loading at an increment of 10%
Harmonic analysis – Simulated between 0%-100% plant loading at an increment of 10%
Harmonic cases run for the main buses to identify resonance cases