Droop Control Techniques for Microgrids
Droop Control Techniques for Microgrids
I. INTRODUCTION
Fig.01: Simulink model of a Microgrid with single converter and virtual grid.
Recently, small-scale microgrid technology with distributed
power generation system combined with power electronic This report has organized as follows, Grid Forming control is
system is the source of future network technologies. An discussed in section II, Grid Feeding control strategy is
efficient microgrid has to ensure the stable operation during presented in section III, Droop control basic in section IV, Grid
faults and various network disturbances [1,2]. The pros of Supporting control based grid forming is explained in section
microgrids are as follows: i) In case of an emergency and power V, section VI discusses the Grid Supporting control based on
shortage during power interruption in the main grid, it provides grid feeding converter. Finally, a conclusion has been drawn.
good solution to supply power, ii) flexibility in switching to
suitable mode of operation either islanded or grid connected
II. GRID FORMING CONTROL
operation, provide voltage and frequency security during
islanded operation and capability to synchronize safely connect Grid-Forming control is fixedly control the grid voltage and
microgrid to the grid , iii) Microgrid can fulfill the power frequency by balancing the power generators and loads. This
demand of all load using distributed generators independently. technique designed for standalone power conversion system for
In this system, it is possible to integrate the renewable energy energy storage applications where most of the grid forming
sources such as photovoltaic, wind and fuel cell generations [3]. component act as ideal voltage source with fixed frequency and
Typical microgrid system comprises of distributed generation zero output impedance. Thus grid forming based control cannot
units with inverters and incorporate control systems that enable be placed in parallel. Diesel generator (gensets) plays rule as
flexible operations. grid forming unit in the Hybrid mini-grid. The advantage of this
control is without integrated battery management system in
This report discussed different control topologies of microgrid grid forming control method; effect of unbalances in power
converters. Discussed topologies are grid forming, grid demand (load) is quite little due to the zero output impedance of
feeding, grid supporting based on grid forming and grid the rotating generators. But, the power quality of power can
supporting based on grid feeding. In this report we used same become worse if a battery inverter is used to construct the grid;
format for main system consisting converter shown in fig 01, this is happened because of larger impedance of the low-pass
filter, measurement block, three types of loads, several switches output filter. The control scheme allows for controlling of both
and a virtual grid. We just implemented different kind of voltage and frequency by varying power of the generator and
control system and add this control with converter to varying it loads.
PWM operation. Then we observed the variation of active and
reactive power, voltage, current and frequency in different load
transition.
.
2
200
-200
-400
300
200
100
-100
-200
-300
0.07
0.06
0.05
0.03
0.02
0.01
Fig 02 shows that whole control where converter with filter is 0
0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45
200
300
200
100
-100
-200
-300
0.07
0.06
0.05
0.04
0.03
0.02
0.01
0
0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25
0
and by extension in load. Grid feeding components designed to
-2 draw or feed a certain amount of power determine by their own
-4
need and wishes, irrespective grid conditions. These
-6
6
x 10
4
0
from the grid without thinking of grid condition.
-2
-4
-6
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2
400
200
-200
-400
100
50
-50
-100
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.5
angle. 200
We simulate the model the model with highly inductive low -200
-400
pass filter using a specific time constant. In all wave shape, 200
yellow is for before filter, magenta is for after filter, cyan is for 100
-100
-200
0.12
0.1
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.02
0
0.4 0.45 0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 0.85 0.9
6
x 10
disconnected from the grid at time t=0.5s. And current is
4
2
increased again at time t=0.8s. There is a high THD at the
0 switching time of the load.
-2
400
-4 300
200
-6
100
-8 0
-100
-10
4
-200
x 10
4
-300
3 -400
2
200
1
150
0
100
-1 50
-2 0
-3 -50
-4 -100
-5 -150
-6 0.25
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5
0.2
Fig.09: Active and reactive power representation for Grid Feeding. 0.15
0.1
Fig 09 depicted that the active and reactive power demand of 0.05
load is fulfilled by converter and grid. Moreover the converter 0.45 0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 0.85 0.9 0.95
is absorbing reactive power from the grid in grid feeding mode. Fig.12: Representation of voltage, current and total harmonic distortion (THD)
at load side for Grid Feeding control.
4
200
V. GRID SUPPORTING BASED ON GRID FORMING
0
200
generators can be connected parallel to share same loads
0
according to their power ratings. The droop controller
-200
discussed in above controls the voltage and frequency by
-400 varying the active and reactive power in response from voltage
0.35
0.3 and frequency droop settings. In this case small transient value
0.25
0.1
0.05
0
0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4
1.5
x 10
Since the load is increasing, the active and reactive power is
1 demand is also increasing. According to the droop theory, the
0.5
system voltage and frequency also tends to decrease. But due to
0
the droop controller functioning, it maintains the voltage and
-0.5
frequency as the droop settings during load transition. In fig 19,
we can see the how the droop controller maintains the voltage
-1
and frequency.
5
x 10
4
1
VI. GRID SUPPORTING BASED ON GRID FEEDING
0
This control scheme contribute to the control of the grid voltage
-1
and frequency by adjusting their active and reactive output
-2
-3
power according to voltage and frequency droops, allowing
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5
power sharing and expandability. These components contribute
Fig.17: Active and reactive power representation for during droop control. to power balancing, making a trade-off between their power
rating and the local voltage and frequency quality. In inverse
During this simulation, we increased the load at 2 times. At droop control provides an automatic active/reactive power
first we add a resistive load at t=0.5s. After that we add an generate/receive predefined control at any event of
inductive load at t=1s. So in fig 17, we observed that the real frequency-voltage deviations in order to mitigate instabilities of
power demand of load has increased and reactive power grid and network. Equation 3 and 4 are used to calculate active
demand has decreased due to adding a resistive load after 0.5s. and reactive power reference.
All power demand fulfilled by grid and converter. Moreover
after 1s, the opposite phenomenon has occurs due to adding an = − − ……... (3)
inductive load to the system.
400
= + − ……..… (4)
200
-200
-400
400
200
-200
-400
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4
Fig.18. Representation of voltage, current and total harmonic distortion (THD) Fig.20: Grid Supporting based on Grid Feeding using inverse droop control.
at load for droop control during load transition..
Rated voltage and frequency ( , ) are set to 230Vrms and
From fig 18 we can see that at starting voltage is unstable. After 50Hz respectively. Rated active and reactive powers are
stabilized, the voltage magnitude is decreasing due the consider for this control techniques 30kW and 20kVAr
increasing the load. In case of current magnitude, opposite respectively. Se simulated the simulink model shown in fig 20
phenomenon has occurred due to increase the load. Overall using this value.
THD is small except at the load switching time.
Ud
340
320
300
280
260
240
Uq
2
1.5
0.5
-0.5
-1
-1.5
f
50.01
50.005
50
49.995
49.99
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5
Fig.21: Simulink model of Grid Supporting based on Grid Feeding.
set the active and reactive power value and synchronized with
grid. 4
Voltage is unvarying at load even if at the load change that
8
6
x 10
means voltage and frequency are controlled correctly in fig 24.
4
2
Magnitudes of current is decreased at load released and restored
0 its magnitude after load connected again.
-2
-4
-6
-8 VII. CONCLUSIONS
-10
5
1
x 10
To sum up, for a stable operation of a micro grid; these control
0.5
schemes implementation is very important. We know that the
0
most of the renewable sources are intermittent. We can easily
-0.5
grid connected hybrid micro grid system by using grid
-1
supporting based on grid feeding control with inverse grid
-1.5
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5
control. It was found that the stand-alone grid-forming
Fig.22: Active and reactive power representation for Grid Supporting generator can depends on the variation of both voltage and
control based on Grid Feeding. frequency from their respective rated values to take immediate
action to adopt the grid-forming role. So we can apply our
During this simulation, we imposed 2 types of load in different learned skills to investigate full-scale development, field
time. At first, we connect a resistive load at t=0.5s and demonstration and experimental performance evaluation of
disconnected at t=0.8s. After resistive load disconnection, we frequency and voltage control methods under various operation
reconnected and inductive load at t=1.2s and disconnected at modes.
t=1.6s. In fig 22, we can see that after resistive load connection,
the load active power demand increased to 80kW which is ACKNOWLEDGMENT
fulfilled by both grid and converter (60kW and 20kW) I am really thankful to Prof. Pablo Arboleya who helped us
respectively. Similar phenomenon has happened in case of
a lot to easily understand the different technical terms of
reactive power demand after connection of inductive load.
400
Micro-grids. Without his continuous efforts, it was very
200 difficult to learn various aspects of Micro grid and Smart grid.
0
-200
-400
REFERENCES
300
200
[1] R. H. Lasseter., a Akhil, C. Marnay, J Stephens, J Dagle, R Guttromson, A.
100
0
Meliopoulous, R Yinger, and J. Eto. April 2002. The CERTS Microgrid
-100
-200
Concept White paper for Transmission Reliability Program, Office of Power
-300
Technologies, U.S. Department of Energy.
-400
0.5
0.4
0.3
[2] A. Arulapalam, [Link], [Link], [Link], N. Jenkins. 2004. Contrl
0.2
of power electronic interfaces in distributed generation microgrid. Int. J.
0.1 Electron. 91(9): 503-523.
0
0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6
[3] F.D Kanellos, A.I. Tsouchnikas, N.D. Hatziargyriou. June 2005. Microgrid
Fig.23: Representation of voltage, current and total harmonic distortion (THD) Simulation during Grid Connected and Islanded Modes of Operation. Proc. of
at load for Grid Supporting base on Grid Feeding control. the Canada International Conference on Power System Transient (IPTS’05).
Vol. 113, pp. 19-23.
In fig 23, the voltage does not change because it connected to
the grid. Between 0.5s to 0.8s, the current magnitude has [4] Andrew M. Bollman “AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF FREQUENCY
increase due to addition of resistive load. But this increment is DROOP CONTROL IN A LOW-INERTIA MICROGRID” MS thesis from
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2009
higher between 1.2s to 1.6s because inductive load consume
more current than resistive load. Overall THD is much lower
that means it almost sinusoidal except at switching time.
Ud
332
330
328
326
324
322
Uq
8
-2
-4
50.01
50.005
50
49.995
49.99
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3