0% found this document useful (0 votes)
3 views4 pages

Albrecht Function Point Analysis Guide

Module 4 covers Albrecht Function Point Analysis (FPA), which measures software size based on user functionality and helps in project management and cost-benefit analysis. It outlines the process of counting and classifying user inputs and outputs, adjusting for complexity, and provides various estimation techniques like Function Points Mark II and Object Points. Additionally, it introduces the COCOMO model for estimating effort and schedule based on software size.

Uploaded by

Tasneem A
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
3 views4 pages

Albrecht Function Point Analysis Guide

Module 4 covers Albrecht Function Point Analysis (FPA), which measures software size based on user functionality and helps in project management and cost-benefit analysis. It outlines the process of counting and classifying user inputs and outputs, adjusting for complexity, and provides various estimation techniques like Function Points Mark II and Object Points. Additionally, it introduces the COCOMO model for estimating effort and schedule based on software size.

Uploaded by

Tasneem A
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Module 4

Albrecht Function Point Analysis (FPA)


FP = U FP ∗ V AF

Purpose: Measures software size based on the functionality delivered to the


user, independent of programming language.

Process:

1. Count user inputs, outputs, inquiries, files, and external interfaces.

2. Classify them by complexity (low/avg/high) and assign weights.

3. Adjust with a “complexity/value adjustment factor” based on 14 general


system characteristics (e.g., performance, reusability).

Outcome: Total Function Points (FP) → converted to effort or cost using


productivity rates.

Objective of FPA:

Encourage early approximation – estimate project size and effort from


functional requirements before detailed design or coding begins.

Support project management – provide a stable basis for planning,


scheduling, budgeting, and tracking progress.

Enable comparative analysis – allow productivity and quality comparisons


across different teams, technologies, or organizations.

Improve cost–benefit analysis – give a clear, quantifiable measure of


delivered functionality to weigh against development and operational costs.

Align with business objectives – focus on user-recognized functions so


estimates reflect the real value delivered to the business.

General System Factors – 14:

Data Communications – degree of distributed or networked data.

Distributed Data Processing – need for distributed computing resources.

Module 4 1
Performance – response-time or throughput requirements.

Heavily Used Configuration – extent of use of hardware or system resources.

Transaction Rate – expected volume or frequency of transactions.

Online Data Entry – proportion of data entered online.

End-User Efficiency – requirements for user-friendly interfaces.

Online Update – need for real-time file updates.

Complex Processing – computational or algorithmic complexity.

Reusability – degree to which code or components must be reusable.

Installation Ease – ease of conversion and installation of the system.

Operational Ease – requirements for automated operation or simple


maintenance.

Multiple Sites – deployment across multiple physical locations.

Facilitate Change – ability to support future changes or enhancements.

Function Points Mark II


FP = (0.58 ∗ N ip) + (1.66 ∗ N enquires) + (0.26 ∗ N op)

Purpose: Measures software size based on the transaction and data


movements focusing on logical user functionality.

Differences:

Focuses on logical transactions (inputs → processing → outputs).

Module 4 2
Uses three data types—Inputs, Outputs, and Entities Referenced—with
simpler weighting.

Eliminates the 14 complexity adjustment factors for greater consistency.

Object Points
Purpose: Estimation technique tailored for object-oriented or 4GL (fourth-
generation language) development and GUI-driven applications.

Process:
Counts:

Screens (User Interfaces)

Reports

3GL Components

Weights each by complexity and adjusts for reuse and productivity to get
New Object Points (NOP), which are converted to person-months.

COCOMO Model (Constructive Cost Model)


Purpose: A parametric model to estimate effort (person-months) and
schedule based on software size in thousands of delivered source lines of
code (KDSI/KLOC).

Versions:

Basic COCOMO

Module 4 3
Intermediate COCOMO: Adds cost drivers (product, platform, personnel,
project).

Detailed COCOMO: Adds phase-wise effort distribution.

Inputs: Estimated size of the code and cost driver ratings (complexity,
reliability, team experience).

Output: Effort, development time, and staffing levels.

Module 4 4

You might also like