t hi

A. P. Sen Memorial Girls’ PG College

as
UNIVERSITY OLUCKNOW

w
B. A. Economics
aA
Semester – III
ic
Paper: Environmental Economics
on

UNIT –1

Dr. Monica Awasthi

M

Assistant Professor
Department of Economics
A. P. Sen Memorial Girls’ PG College
University of Lucknow
r.
D
 Disclaimer

The electronic content is specifically designed for academic purposes, aiming to enhance the
quality of teaching and learning results. Engaging in economic or commercial activity outside the
allowed scope is absolutely prohibited. The act of disseminating, distributing, or sharing the
content by users is explicitly forbidden, and its utilization is restricted solely to the objective of

hi
enhancing personal knowledge. The information contained within this digital content has been
obtained from authentic references and sources, to the best of my knowledge.

t
as
Course Outline:

w
Unit I: Basic Concepts

aA
●​ Environmental Economics: Meaning and Scope
●​ Environment and Economy: Neo-classical and Ecological Economics
Perspectives, Interlinkages,
●​ Material Balance Model
ic
●​ Environment and Development Trade-off
●​ Functions of Environment
on

इकाई I: मल
ू अवधारणाएँ
M

●​ पर्यावरण अर्थशास्त्र का अर्थ और दायरा

●​ पर्यावरण और अर्थव्यवस्था- नव-शास्त्रीय और पारिस्थितिक अर्थशास्त्र के परिप्रेक्ष्य व
अंतर्संबंध, भौतिक संतल
ु न मॉडल
r.

●​ पर्यावरण और विकास के बीच संतल

ु न
●​ पर्यावरण के कार्य
D
 Course Objectives

●​ To introduce students to the fundamental concepts of environmental economics

and its scope.

hi
●​ To explain the interlinkages between the economy and the environment through
neo-classical and ecological perspectives.
●​ To develop an understanding of models like the material balance principle and the

t
environment–development trade-off.

as
●​ To highlight the critical functions of the environment in sustaining economic
activities and human welfare.​

w
Learning Outcomes aA
●​ Students will be able to explain the meaning, scope, and significance of
environmental economics.
●​ They will analyse the economy–environment relationship using both neo-classical
ic
and ecological frameworks.
●​ They will apply the material balance model to understand resource use and
on

pollution generation.
●​ They will critically evaluate the trade-offs between economic development and
environmental sustainability.​
M
r.
D
 Introduction to Environmental Economics: Basic Concepts

hi
What is Environmental Economics?
Environmental economics is a branch or sub-discipline of economics that studies the
interactions between the economy and the environment. It primarily focuses on understanding

t
how economic activities affect the natural environment and how economic policies can be

as
designed to address environmental issues efficiently.

w
The discipline emphasises the sustainable use and management of natural resources, dealing
with problems such as pollution, resource depletion, climate change, and ecosystem service
valuation.
aA
It applies economic principles to analyse the costs and benefits of environmental policies,
aiming to balance economic growth with environmental protection and sustainable development.

The scope of environmental economics includes:

ic
●​ Resource Management: Allocation and management of natural resources like water,
forests, fisheries, and minerals, influenced by economic incentives and regulations.
on

●​ Pollution Control: Analysis and design of cost-effective pollution abatement policies

such as taxes and tradable permits.
●​ Climate Change Economics: Studying the economic impacts of climate change and
M

policy responses.
●​ Ecosystem Services Valuation: Assessing economic value of benefits provided by
ecosystems, including water purification and carbon sequestration.
r.

●​ Environmental Policy Analysis: Evaluating effectiveness, efficiency, and equity of

environmental regulations and market-based instruments.
D

●​ Promoting Sustainable Development: Finding equilibrium between economic growth,

environmental security, and social justice to meet present and future needs.
 ●​ Environmental economics also addresses market failures like externalities (where the
costs of pollution are not reflected in market prices), public goods, and resource scarcity.
●​ It helps in crafting policies that internalise environmental costs, incentivise green
technology and conservation, and consider long-term environmental impacts.

hi
In short, environmental economics provides both theoretical and empirical tools to analyse the
economic effects of environmental factors and policies, aiming for the efficient and sustainable
use of environmental resources while supporting human well-being.

t
as
Core Concepts in Environmental Economics

1.​ The Economy-Environment Link:

w
●​ Recognises that the economy functions within the finite limits of the environment.
●​ Economic processes extract resources (inputs) from nature and return waste
(outputs), linking environmental quality with human well-being.
aA
2.​ Market Failure and Externalities:
●​ Environmental problems often arise from market failures—especially negative
externalities, where costs of pollution or resource degradation are not reflected in
market prices.
●​ The concept of externalities highlights why government intervention (regulation,
ic
taxes, tradable permits) is needed to achieve social welfare.
3.​ Public Goods and Common Property Resources:
●​ Many environmental assets (clean air, oceans, biodiversity) are “public
on

goods”—non-excludable and non-rivalrous, making them prone to overuse or

underprotection without coordinated management.
●​ Common property resources (like community forests, fisheries) require collective
action and well-defined property rights for sustainable management.
M

4.​ Valuation of Environmental Goods:

●​ Environmental economics seeks to assign economic value to non-market goods
(ecosystem services, clean air, biodiversity) using methods like contingent
valuation, revealed preference, and cost-benefit analysis.
●​ Valuation is crucial for decision-making and policy design.
r.

5.​ Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA):

●​ Used to assess the total costs and benefits of public projects and policies, taking
into account both direct and indirect, market and non-market impacts on society.
D

6.​ Sustainable Development:

●​ Central to environmental economics is the objective of balancing economic
growth with poverty alleviation and long-term environmental stewardship.
 ●​ Promotes practices that meet present needs without compromising the ability of
future generations to meet their own.
7.​ Policy Instruments:
●​ Evaluates and recommends tools such as pollution taxes, cap-and-trade systems,
command-and-control regulations, and subsidizing green technologies to correct
market failures.

hi
Why Environmental Economics is Important

t
●​ Informs public policy to address pressing challenges like climate change, biodiversity

as
loss, and resource depletion.
●​ Provides mechanisms and metrics to internalize environmental costs, aligning private and
public interest.
●​ Contributes to achieving global sustainability goals by integrating environmental values

w
into economic decision-making.
In summary, environmental economics provides the analytical foundation for understanding,
aA
quantifying, and managing the complex interactions between economic activity and
environmental systems, equipping decision-makers to craft effective, equitable, and sustainable
solutions for present and future generations.
ic
Economy-Environment Interaction

1. The Fundamental Linkage

on

The economy and the environment are deeply interconnected:

●​ The environment provides resources, like minerals, water, forests, land, and energy, that
fuel economic production and consumption activities.
M

●​ The economy, in turn, returns waste and pollution to the environment as byproducts of
production and consumption.

2. Circular Flow: Resources and Residuals

●​ Resource Flow: Raw materials and ecosystem services flow from the environment into
r.

the economic system, supporting industries and households.

●​ Residual Flow: After use, residuals (wastes, emissions, pollutants) go back into the
D

environment, which must absorb or recycle them. If this exceeds the environment’s
carrying or assimilative capacity, it results in pollution, resource depletion, and ecological
degradation.
 3. Mutual Impact
●​ Economy on Environment: Economic growth often increases pressure on the
environment through extraction, land use change, pollution, and waste. GDP expansion
can lead to higher consumption of non-renewable resources, deforestation, water/air/soil
pollution, climate change, and biodiversity loss.

hi
●​ Environment on Economy: Environmental degradation impairs economic productivity,
leads to health costs, reduces resources for future growth, and can trigger disasters (like
floods or droughts) that damage infrastructure and livelihoods.

t
4. The Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC)

as
●​ The EKC hypothesis suggests that economic growth initially increases environmental
degradation, but after a certain income threshold, societies invest in cleaner technology
and regulations, improving environmental quality—a possible “turning point”.

w
●​ However, this relationship doesn’t apply universally, as the type of pollutant, regulatory
approach, and economic structure all influence outcomes.

5. Trade-offs and Co-Benefits

aA
●​ There is often a trade-off between rapid economic growth and environmental quality:
early development may degrade resources, but sustainably managed growth can lead to
investments in environmental protection and green technologies.
●​ Technological advances, policy interventions, and public demand can decouple economic
ic
growth from environmental harm (eco-economic decoupling), e.g., through renewable
energy, pollution controls, and circular economy models.
on

6. The Way Forward: Sustainable Development

●​ The goal is to integrate economic activity with environmental stewardship, ensuring that
growth today does not undermine the ecosystems on which future prosperity depends.
M

●​ This requires policy frameworks, effective regulation, cleaner technologies, and societal
valuing of ecosystem services.
Conclusion​
The interaction between economy and environment is a two-way process: the environment
sustains economic activity through resources and services, while economic processes impact and
r.

sometimes degrade environmental quality. Sustainable development seeks to manage this linkage
to enhance prosperity and well-being for current and future generations
D
 Neo-classical Economics Perspective

Neoclassical economics is a school of thought that emerged in the late 19th century,
characterized by its focus on marginal analysis and market efficiency. The neo-classical
economics view treats the environment primarily as a source of resources and a sink for waste,

hi
which are inputs and outputs in the economic process. Its key assumptions and approaches
towards environment-economy relations include:

t
as
●​ Resource Allocation by Markets: Neo-classical theory holds that markets, through price
mechanisms, can efficiently allocate scarce resources, including environmental goods.
Environmental problems are seen as market failures that can be corrected by policy

w
instruments such as taxes, subsidies, or tradable permits (e.g., carbon trading) to
internalise externalities like pollution.
aA
●​ Technology and Substitution: It is optimistic about human ingenuity and technological
progress, suggesting that natural resource limits can be overcome or substituted by
man-made capital and innovation.
●​ Cost-Benefit Analysis: Decisions about environmental regulations rely heavily on
cost-benefit analysis. This method aims to balance the benefits of economic development
ic
against the costs imposed on the environment, using methods like willingness-to-pay to
value environmental goods.
on

●​ Anthropocentric Outlook: The approach is strongly human-centred—nature’s value is

largely determined by its utility for human consumption or production.
●​ Market-based Instruments: Emphasizes the use of economic instruments—pollution
M

taxes, subsidy removal, and property rights—to “correct” environmental market failures.

Ecological Economics Perspective

Ecological economics challenges several neo-classical assumptions, focusing instead on the
r.

complex, dynamic, and interdependent relationship between human economies and the natural
D

world:

●​ Economy as a Subsystem: This view sees the economy as embedded within the finite
global ecosystem, subject to biophysical limits and the laws of thermodynamics.
 ●​ Ecological Limits and Strong Sustainability: Ecological economists argue that
continuous economic growth is not always possible due to finite natural resources. They
stress "strong sustainability," which means certain natural capital (e.g., biodiversity,
climate stability) cannot be substituted.

hi
●​ Value Beyond Utility: Nature has intrinsic value—not just economic value—so
preserving the environment is about ethical and ecological obligations, not just
cost-benefit trade-offs.

t
●​ Interdisciplinary Approach: The field draws on the natural and social sciences, using

as
systems thinking, ecological modelling, and precautionary principles to address
uncertainty and complexity in environmental policy.
●​ Focus on Resilience and Distribution: It emphasizes ecological resilience, precaution,

w
and equity—arguing for limits to consumption, transformative policy shifts, and
distributive justice for both current and future generations.
aA
●​ Critique of Market Solutions: Ecological economists are skeptical that markets, even
with tweaks, can fully value or protect critical ecosystem functions, and argue for
broader, often non-market-based, policy and societal reforms.
ic
Comparative Table

Perspective Core View on Solution View on Policy Value Basis

on

Environment Focus Growth Tools

Optimistic:
Resource/input Market-based Taxes,
M

growth is
Neoclassical for the economy; instruments, subsidies, Anthropocentric,
always
Economics externalities as cost/benefit, tradeable utilitarian
possible
market failures technology permits
with tech
r.

Resource
Economy is a Precaution, Growth
caps, Intrinsic,
Ecological subsystem of the system limited by
regulation, ecological,
D

Economics ecosystem, finite change, strong ecological

systems precautionary
limits sustainability boundaries
thinking
 In summary, neo-classical economics relies on optimising market solutions and technological
advancement to fix environmental issues, while ecological economics advocates for deep
systemic changes, respecting ecological limits, and reconsidering values and ethics beyond pure
market efficiency;

hi
Interlinkages Between Neo-classical and Ecological Economics in

t
Environment and Economy

as
The relationship between neo-classical economics and ecological economics is characterised by
both intersections and divergences—each playing important but distinct roles in analyzing

w
environment-economy connections.

Points of Interconnection aA
●​ Resource Allocation & Management: Both approaches are concerned with the
allocation and management of resources. Neo-classical economics applies market-based
tools (prices, taxes, permits), whereas ecological economics highlights system constraints
and the need for sustainable management within the limits of natural ecosystems.
ic
●​ Valuation of Environmental Goods: Neo-classical economists employ environmental
valuation techniques—such as cost-benefit analysis and willingness-to-pay methods—to
on

inform policy decisions. Ecological economists critique and sometimes adapt these
methods, recognising their role but arguing for a broader set of values beyond market
prices.
M

●​ Recognition of Externalities: Both schools recognise that market mechanisms, left

unchecked, may result in negative externalities like pollution. Neo-classical economics
focuses on “correcting” these market failures, while ecological economics contends that
not all environmental values can be monetized or effectively managed by markets alone.
r.

●​ Sustainability Goal: There is shared ground on the importance of moving toward

sustainable development and decoupling economic growth from harmful environmental
D

impacts, even though their philosophies differ regarding necessary policy measures and
the nature of “growth” itself.
 Divergences and Limits

●​ Growth versus Development: Neo-classical economics emphasizes continuous

economic growth, rooted in faith in technological progress and the substitutability of
capital. Ecological economics, meanwhile, stresses the biophysical limits to growth and

hi
argues for a focus on broader notions of development—emphasizing quality of life,
equity, and system resilience over mere GDP expansion.
●​ Ethical Foundations: Neo-classical thought is anthropocentric and utilitarian, valuing

t
nature for its usefulness to humans. Ecological economics incorporates intrinsic

as
environmental values and stronger ethical and precautionary principles, questioning the
adequacy of pure utility as a guiding metric.

w
●​ Policy Prescriptions: Neo-classical policy relies mainly on instruments that adjust prices
and incentives within the market system. Ecological economics advocates for systemic
aA
change, sometimes including regulatory or non-market-based approaches to respect
ecosystem boundaries and ensure intergenerational and intragenerational equity.
●​ Treatment of Uncertainty: Ecological economics pays greater attention to uncertainty,
long-term risks, and the possibility of irreversible environmental change, recommending
precaution over efficiency as a policy guide.
ic
●​ Science and Interdisciplinarity: Neo-classical economics often seeks objective,
model-based analysis, while ecological economics pursues an interdisciplinary and
on

systems-thinking approach, drawing on natural sciences, ethics, and social disciplines.

Bridging the Divide: Hybrid Approaches

M

●​ In practice, there is an increasing convergence in acknowledging that sustainable

economic research requires integrating ecological, societal, and economic dimensions—a
so-called “three-pillar” concept of sustainability.
●​ Efforts to incorporate natural capital valuation and cost-benefit analysis into
r.

environmental policies often reflect attempts to blend neoclassical tools with ecological
D

constraints, even though ecological economics frequently finds these tools insufficient on
their own.
 ●​ Both schools now widely agree on the need for interdisciplinary empirical research
susceptible to policy advice, with overlaps in valuation techniques and shared critiques of
"pure growth" strategies.

hi
Conclusion
Neo-classical and ecological economics are interlinked in their shared concern for achieving
sustainability and efficient resource use, but differ substantially in their assumptions, ethical

t
foundations, and policy prescriptions. Ongoing dialogue—focusing on what each approach does

as
best—continues to enrich environmental economic analysis and real-world policy formulation

The Material Balance Model

w
The Material Balance Model is a fundamental concept in environmental economics that
aA
illustrates the physical relationship between the economy and the environment, emphasising that
all economic activities are subject to the laws of thermodynamics—especially the law of
conservation of matter known as first law of thermodynamics which refers to the principle of
conservation of matter and energy, This means that matter cannot be created or destroyed; it
merely changes form during production and consumption processes.
ic
The circular flow model explains how households and firms interact through the factor and
on

product markets. The Materials Balance Model extends this by incorporating the role of the
environment (Nature).

It shows two crucial linkages between the economy and the environment:
M

1.​ Environment as a Source of Resources​

Nature provides inputs to both firms (minerals, water, sunlight, etc.) and households
(fruits, firewood, drinking water, etc.).
r.

2.​ Environment as a Sink for Residuals (Waste)

○​ By-products of production and consumption (smoke, effluents, solid waste, etc.)
D

flow back into the environment.​

 ○​ Some wastes can be recycled, reused, or recovered, delaying environmental
degradation.

Thus, the model highlights a two-way interaction:

hi
●​ Flow of resources from nature to economy.
●​ Flow of residuals (waste) from economy to nature.

t
This principle underscores the interdependence of ecology and economy, emphasizing that

as
economic activities are ultimately constrained by environmental capacities.

Core Features

w
●​ Resource Flow: The environment is the source of all raw materials (renewable and
non-renewable) needed by the economy. These resources are extracted and used by
aA
productive sectors and ultimately by households.
●​ Waste Generation: Both production and consumption activities generate wastes or
residuals. These residuals are returned to the environment as emissions, trash, sewage, or
pollutants.
ic
●​ Mass Balance: According to the material balance principle, the total mass of resources
extracted from the environment eventually equals the total mass of goods produced and
on

wastes returned to nature. In mathematical terms:

Total Inputs = Total Outputs + Wastes (Residuals)

M

Since matter cannot disappear, everything extracted must ultimately be released

somewhere, either as products or as waste.

●​ Waste Assimilation: The environment has the capacity to absorb, recycle, or neutralise
r.

some waste, but this capacity is limited. Excessive waste release can overwhelm natural
assimilation, leading to pollution and environmental degradation.
D
 t hi
as
w
aA
Implications for Environmental Economics

●​ Bridges Economy and Environment: Unlike the conventional circular flow model
(which focuses mainly on the exchange of goods, services, and money between
ic
households and firms), the material balance model incorporates the flow of physical
materials and highlights environmental constraints.
on

●​ Policy Relevance: It underpins environmental policy by showing that managing resource

use and waste generation is critical. Policy interventions can target reducing input use,
promoting recycling, or improving waste management so that the assimilative capacity of
the environment is not exceeded.
M

●​ Externalities: The model illustrates the pervasive nature of environmental externalities:

since all residues eventually return to the environment, external costs from pollution are
an inherent feature.
r.

Representation
D

The model is often depicted as a system where the environment surrounds the economy.
Materials flow from the environment into the economic system as inputs, are transformed
 through production and consumption, and then flow back as waste or emissions. At each stage,
some materials become useful goods or services while the rest become residuals.

Applications

hi
●​ Resource and Waste Accounting: Tracking material and energy flows for sustainability
analysis.
●​ Eco-Efficiency Measurement: Comparing input use and waste output to improve

t
production efficiency.

as
●​ Environmental Impact Assessment: Understanding and mitigating the impact of
economic activities on ecological systems.

w
In short, the material balance model provides a systematic, physically-grounded framework for
analyzing the links between economic activity, resource use, and environmental quality,
aA
highlighting the inevitability of waste generation and the critical importance of environmental
limits to economic processes

Environment and Development Trade-off

ic
The environment and development trade-off refers to the dilemma societies face when
pursuing economic growth, as development activities often lead to environmental degradation.
on

This trade-off is at the heart of environmental economics and sustainable development debates.

Meaning
M

●​ A trade-off in this context means that increasing economic output may require sacrificing
environmental quality, and conversely, prioritizing environmental protection may limit
economic opportunities and slow development.
●​ Economic development typically involves industrialization, construction, and resource
r.

extraction, all of which consume natural resources and generate pollution or waste.
●​ The opportunity cost is central: opting for more growth can worsen environmental health,
D

while strict environmental conservation may lower employment or income.

 Examples

●​ Industrialization vs. Emission Reduction: As industries grow, pollution levels rise.

Imposing strict environmental standards can slow industrial output or raise costs for
businesses.

hi
●​ Energy Generation vs. Air Quality: Expanding energy supply—especially from fossil
fuels—fuels growth but worsens air pollution. Policies favouring renewables can be
costlier and limit short-term energy supply.

t
●​ Infrastructure Development vs. Ecosystem Loss: Building roads, dams, or cities often

as
requires deforestation, destruction of habitats, and higher resource consumption, which
can reduce biodiversity.

w
●​ Agricultural Expansion vs. Sustainability: Expanding farming feeds populations but
can cause soil degradation, water overuse, and pesticide pollution.

Policy and Management of Trade-offs

aA
Balancing this trade-off requires thoughtful strategies:

●​ Integrated Policies: Policymakers can design regulations, incentives, and standards

ic
considering both economic growth and ecological constraints. For instance, green taxes
or emission trading schemes penalise pollution while raising revenue.
on

●​ Technological Innovation: Promoting cleaner technologies (e.g., renewable energy,

energy-efficient processes, pollution control devices) can decouple growth from
environmental harm.
●​ Sustainable Development: The idea is to "meet the needs of the present without
M

compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs" by endorsing
practices like green and circular economies, sustainable resource management, and
low-carbon infrastructure.
r.

●​ Stakeholder Participation and Equity: Engage communities, especially those

disproportionately affected by environmental or economic policies, to design fair and
D

widely accepted solutions.

Case Studies:
 ●​ Costa Rica’s sustainable tourism promotes growth while protecting biodiversity.
●​ Sweden’s carbon tax encourages clean innovation and reduces emissions without
stalling economic progress.

hi
Production Possibility Frontier (PPF) Visualization
The trade-off is often modelled using the Production Possibility Frontier (PPF):

t
●​ At one extreme of the PPF: Maximum output, minimum environmental protection.

as
●​ At the other extreme: Maximum environmental protection, minimum economic output.
●​ Ideally, societies seek an optimal point on the frontier, maximising both within limits,
efficient, yet mindful of resource and ecological constraints.

w
Conclusion
aA
The trade-off between environment and development is real, but not necessarily antagonistic.
Policy, innovation, and stakeholder engagement can help minimise negative impacts, striving for
sustainable development that balances economic growth with environmental stewardship for
long-term well-being
ic
Functions of the Environment
The environment performs several essential functions that are foundational to both ecological
on

balance and human well-being. The main functions of the environment include:

1. Supply of Resources
M

The environment provides all the resources necessary for the survival and development of
humans and other living beings. These resources include:

●​ Renewable resources: such as air, water, sunlight, and forests, which can
r.

regenerate naturally.
●​ Non-renewable resources: such as coal, petroleum, minerals, and metals, which
D

are finite and deplete over time.​

These resources serve as inputs for production, construction, food, and various
economic activities.
 2. Sustaining Life
The environment supports life by providing vital elements such as oxygen, water, soil,
and sunlight. These components are essential for the survival of all organisms and the
maintenance of biodiversity. Without these, life on Earth would not be possible.

hi
3. Assimilation of Waste/ Sink Function
Production and consumption activities generate waste, such as garbage, sewage, and

t
emissions. The environment absorbs, recycles, and neutralizes these wastes, helping to

as
maintain a clean and healthy habitat. However, when waste generation exceeds the
environment's assimilative capacity, pollution occurs.

w
4. Enhancing Quality of Life
The environment enriches human life by offering aesthetic, recreational, and cultural
aA
value. Natural features like mountains, rivers, oceans, forests, and wildlife provide
beauty, inspiration, and psychological benefits. The quality of life is improved as people
enjoy and interact with their surroundings.
ic
5. Climate and Ecological Regulation
The environment regulates essential ecological processes and climatic conditions,
on

including temperature, rainfall, the carbon cycle, and ecosystem stability. This regulatory
function helps sustain agriculture, manage natural disasters, and maintain the Earth’s
habitability.
M

6. Provision of Ecosystem Services

Besides tangible resources, the environment provides intangible ecosystem services such
as pollination, nutrient cycling, and genetic diversity, which are vital for food production
r.

and disease control.

7. Educational Function (cultural)
D

The environment plays a multifaceted and indispensable role in sustaining life,

supporting economic and social activities, maintaining ecological stability, and enhancing
 the quality of human existence. Responsible management of environmental functions is
vital to support current and future generations.

पर्यावरणीय अर्थशास्त्र : मल
ू भत
ू अवधारणाएँ

hi
1. पर्यावरणीय अर्थशास्त्र की परिभाषा

t
पर्यावरणीय अर्थशास्त्र (Environmental Economics) अर्थशास्त्र की वह शाखा है जो अर्थव्यवस्था और

as
पर्यावरण के बीच अंतःक्रियाओं का अध्ययन करती है । यह विश्लेषण करती है कि आर्थिक गतिविधियाँ
(जैसे उत्पादन, उपभोग, निवेश, उद्योगीकरण) किस प्रकार प्राकृतिक संसाधनों के दोहन, प्रदष
ू ण और

w
पारिस्थितिकी तंत्र पर प्रभाव डालती हैं। साथ ही यह अध्ययन करती है कि आर्थिक नीतियाँ, कर, सब्सिडी,
और बाज़ार तंत्र का उपयोग करके पर्यावरणीय समस्याओं का समाधान किस प्रकार किया जा सकता है ।
aA
डब्ल्य.ू पियर्स (D.W. Pearce) के शब्दों में , “Environmental Economics brings the discipline of
economic analysis to environmental issues such as pollution, the rate of use of renewable and
non-renewable natural resources, conservation of living species and resources, and the choice of
policy to achieve environmental ends.”
ic
(पर्यावरणीय अर्थशास्त्र, प्रदष
ू ण, नवीकरणीय और अ-नवीकरणीय प्राकृतिक संसाधनों के उपयोग की दर,
जीवित प्रजातियों और संसाधनों के संरक्षण, तथा पर्यावरणीय लक्ष्यों को प्राप्त करने के लिए नीति के
on

चन
ु ाव जैसे मद्
ु दों पर आर्थिक विश्लेषण के अनश
ु ासन को लागू करता है ।)

2. पर्यावरणीय अर्थशास्त्र का उद्दे श्य

M

●​ प्राकृतिक संसाधनों का सतत उपयोग सनि

ु श्चित करना।
●​ प्रदष
ू ण और पर्यावरणीय क्षरण को कम करने के लिए उपयक्
ु त नीतियों का निर्माण करना।
●​ संसाधनों की कमी और जलवायु परिवर्तन से उत्पन्न चन
ु ौतियों का आर्थिक दृष्टिकोण से
r.

समाधान खोजना।
●​ सतत विकास (Sustainable Development) की दिशा में संतल
ु न स्थापित करना अर्थात वर्तमान
D

पीढ़ी की ज़रूरतें परू ी हों, पर भविष्य की पीढ़ियों की आवश्यकताएँ भी सरु क्षित रहें ।

3. पर्यावरणीय अर्थशास्त्र का क्षेत्र (Scope)

 पर्यावरणीय अर्थशास्त्र कई आयामों को समेटता है , जिनमें प्रमख
ु हैं—

1.​ संसाधन प्रबंधन (Resource Management):

○​ जल, वन, मत्स्य, भमि
ू , खनिज जैसे संसाधनों का न्यायसंगत और कुशल प्रबंधन।
○​ संसाधनों के संरक्षण और नवीनीकरण के लिए आर्थिक प्रोत्साहन और नियम।

hi
2.​ प्रदष
ू ण नियंत्रण (Pollution Control):
○​ प्रदष
ू ण कर (Pollution Tax), कैप-एंड-ट्रे ड (Cap-and-Trade) जैसे बाज़ार आधारित
उपकरण।

t
○​ न्यन
ू तम लागत पर प्रदष
ू ण कम करने के लिए नीतिगत ढाँचा।

as
3.​ जलवायु परिवर्तन का अर्थशास्त्र (Climate Change Economics):
○​ वैश्विक तापन (Global Warming) और चरम मौसम की घटनाओं के आर्थिक प्रभाव।

w
○​ अनक
ु ू लन (Adaptation) और शमन (Mitigation) की नीतियों का मल्
ू यांकन।
4.​ पारिस्थितिकी सेवाओं का मल्
ू यांकन (Valuation of Ecosystem Services):

आर्थिक मल्
ू यांकन।
aA
○​ वनों द्वारा कार्बन अवशोषण, नदियों द्वारा जल शद्
ु धिकरण, परागण सेवाएँ इत्यादि का

○​ नीति निर्माण और संसाधन आवंटन में इन मल्

ू यों का समावेश।
5.​ पर्यावरण नीति विश्लेषण (Environmental Policy Analysis):
○​ नियमों और आर्थिक उपकरणों (जैसे कर, सब्सिडी, परमिट) की प्रभावशीलता का
ic
मल्
ू यांकन।
○​ दक्षता (Efficiency), न्याय (Equity), और व्यावहारिकता (Feasibility) पर ध्यान।
on

6.​ सतत विकास (Sustainable Development):

○​ आर्थिक वद्
ृ धि, सामाजिक न्याय और पर्यावरणीय सरु क्षा—तीनों में सामंजस्य।
○​ संयक्
ु त राष्ट्र के Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) के अनरू
ु प नीतियाँ।
M

4. पर्यावरणीय अर्थशास्त्र की मख्

ु य अवधारणाएँ

(i) अर्थव्यवस्था और पर्यावरण का संबंध

r.

●​ पर्यावरण से संसाधन लेकर अर्थव्यवस्था वस्तओ

ु ं एवं सेवाओं का उत्पादन करती है ।
D

●​ प्राकृतिक संसाधनों का उत्पादन और उपभोग की प्रक्रिया के दौरान प्रयोग कर उनसे त्पन्न

अपशिष्ट एवं प्रदष
ू ण पन
ु ः पर्यावरण में वापस पहुंचा दिए जाता हैं।
 ●​ यदि यह प्रदष
ू ण एवं अपशिष्ट पदार्थ पर्यावरण की अवशोषण क्षमता (assimilative capacity)
से अधिक हो जाए, तो संसाधनों का क्षरण और प्रदष
ू ण बढ़ता है ।

(ii) बाज़ार विफलता और बाह्य प्रभाव (Market Failure & Externalities)

hi
●​ सामान्य रूप से वस्तु का मल्
ू य निर्धारण उसकी मांग एवं आपर्ति
ू अर्थात वस्तु से प्राप्त होने वाले
लाभ तथा उसके उत्पादन में आने वाली लागत के आधार पर किया जाता है ।
●​ पर प्राय: वस्तओ
ु ं के बाज़ार मल्
ू य में उन सामाजिक लागतों को शामिल नहीं किया जाता जिनका

t
बोझ समाज पर पड़ता है । जैसे प्रदष
ू ण जैसी लागतें शामिल नहीं होतीं।

as
उदाहरण: एक फैक्ट्री जब प्रदषि
ू त जल नदी में छोड़ती है , तो समाज को स्वास्थ्य व पर्यावरणीय
नक
ु सान उठाना पड़ता है ।

w
●​ इस स्थिति को नकारात्मक बाह्य प्रभाव (Negative Externality) कहते हैं।
●​ समाधान: प्रदष
ू ण कर, ट्रे डब

(iii) सार्वजनिक वस्तए

aA
े ल परमिट, सरकारी नियम।

ु ँ और साझा संसाधन (Public Goods & Common Property Resources)

●​ स्वच्छ हवा, महासागर, जैव विविधता जैसी चीज़ें सार्वजनिक वस्तए

ु ँ हैं, न इन्हें किसी के द्वारा
प्रयोग करने से रोका जा सकता है और न ही एक व्यक्ति के उपयोग से दस
ू रे के उपयोग में कमी
ic
आती है ।
●​ इनका प्रबंधन सामहि
ू क कार्यवाही और सस्
ु पष्ट संपत्ति अधिकारों द्वारा किया जाता है ।
on

(iv) पर्यावरणीय वस्तओ

ु ं का मल्
ू यांकन (Valuation of Environmental Goods)

●​ स्वच्छ हवा या जैव विविधता जैसी वस्तओ

ु ं का प्रत्यक्ष बाज़ार मल्
ू य नहीं होता।
M

●​ इनके मल्
ू यांकन हे तु सशर्त मल्
ू यांकन (Contingent Valuation), लागत-लाभ विश्लेषण
(Cost-Benefit Analysis) जैसी पद्धतियाँ उपयोग होती हैं।

(v) सतत विकास (Sustainable Development)

r.

●​ "वर्तमान पीढ़ी की आवश्यकताओं को इस प्रकार परू ा करना कि भविष्य की पीढ़ियों की

D

आवश्यकताओं से समझौता न हो।" (ब्रंटलैंड रिपोर्ट, 1987)

●​ इसमें आर्थिक, सामाजिक और पर्यावरणीय लक्ष्यों का संतल
ु न निहित है ।​
 5. अर्थव्यवस्था-पर्यावरण अंतःक्रिया (Economy-Environment Interaction)

(i) संसाधन और अवशेष का प्रवाह

●​ संसाधन प्रवाह: पर्यावरण से अर्थव्यवस्था में (खनिज, जल, ऊर्जा)।

hi
●​ अपशिष्ट प्रवाह: अर्थव्यवस्था से पर्यावरण में (प्रदष
ू ण, ठोस अपशिष्ट)।

(ii) पारस्परिक प्रभाव

t
as
●​ अर्थव्यवस्था → पर्यावरण: संसाधनों का अति-उपयोग, वनों की कटाई, प्रदष
ू ण।
●​ पर्यावरण → अर्थव्यवस्था: स्वास्थ्य लागत, आपदाओं से नक
ु सान, उत्पादन क्षमता में कमी।

w
(iii) पर्यावरण कुज़नेट्स वक्र (Environmental Kuznets Curve - EKC)

●​ जैसे-जैसे आय बढ़ती है , प्रदष

ू ण भी बढ़ता है ।
aA
●​ लेकिन एक स्तर के बाद समाज प्रदष
ू ण घटाने के उपाय करता है और पर्यावरण गुणवत्ता सध
ु रने
लगती है ।
●​ यह वक्र हर स्थिति में लागू नहीं होता, बल्कि यह प्रदष
ू ण के प्रकार और नीति-ढाँचे पर निर्भर
करता है ।
ic
(iv) विकास और पर्यावरणीय गण
ु वत्ता के बीच संतल
ु न
on

●​ तेज़ आर्थिक वद्

ृ धि कई बार पर्यावरण को हानि पहुँचाती है ।
●​ लेकिन नई प्रौद्योगिकी, नीति हस्तक्षेप और जन-जागरूकता से “ग्रीन ग्रोथ” संभव है ।
●​ उदाहरण: नवीकरणीय ऊर्जा, सर्कु लर इकोनॉमी मॉडल।
M

6. निष्कर्ष

पर्यावरणीय अर्थशास्त्र यह स्पष्ट करता है कि अर्थव्यवस्था और पर्यावरण परस्पर निर्भर हैं। जहाँ एक ओर
r.

पर्यावरण संसाधन और सेवाएँ प्रदान करता है , वहीं दस

ू री ओर अर्थव्यवस्था उस पर बोझ डालती है ।​
इसलिए, नीतियों और आर्थिक तंत्र का उद्दे श्य होना चाहिए—सतत विकास, ताकि वर्तमान और भविष्य
D

दोनों पीढ़ियाँ सरु क्षित और समद्

ृ ध रह सकें।
 नव-शास्त्रीय अर्थशास्त्र (Neo-Classical Economics) और पारिस्थितिक
अर्थशास्त्र (Ecological Economics): तल
ु नात्मक दृष्टि

1. नव-शास्त्रीय अर्थशास्त्र का दृष्टिकोण

hi
नव-शास्त्रीय अर्थशास्त्र 19वीं शताब्दी के अंत में विकसित हुआ। इसका मख्
ु य जोर सीमान्त विश्लेषण
(Marginal Analysis) और बाजार की दक्षता (Market Efficiency) पर है ।​

t
यह दृष्टिकोण पर्यावरण को मख्
ु यतः दो रूपों में दे खता है :

as
●​ संसाधनों का स्रोत (Source of Resources)
●​ अपशिष्ट का निस्तारण स्थल (Sink for Waste)

w
प्रमख
ु मान्यताएँ:
aA
1.​ बाजार के माध्यम से संसाधनों का बंटवारा (Resource Allocation):​
नव-शास्त्रीय अर्थशास्त्र मानता है कि यदि कीमतें सही तरीके से तय हों तो बाजार स्वयं scarce
संसाधनों का सही उपयोग कर सकता है ।
○​ प्रदष
ू ण जैसी समस्याओं को बाजार विफलता (Market Failure) माना जाता है ।
ic
○​ इन्हें ठीक करने के लिए सरकार कर (tax), सब्सिडी (subsidy), या परमिट प्रणाली (जैसे
कार्बन ट्रे डिग
ं ) अपनाती है ।​
on

2.​ प्रौद्योगिकी और प्रतिस्थापन (Technology & Substitution):​

यह दृष्टिकोण आशावादी है और मानता है कि तकनीकी प्रगति और मानव नवाचार प्राकृतिक
M

संसाधनों की कमी को परू ा कर दें गे। उदाहरण: सौर ऊर्जा कोयले का विकल्प बन सकती है
3.​ लागत-लाभ विश्लेषण (Cost-Benefit Analysis):​
पर्यावरणीय नीतियों को तय करने के लिए लागत और लाभ का तल
ु नात्मक अध्ययन किया जाता
है ।
r.

○​ जैसे किसी उद्योग से मिलने वाले आर्थिक लाभ और उससे होने वाले प्रदष
ू ण की लागत
का मल्
ू यांकन।
D

4.​ मानव-केंद्रित दृष्टिकोण (Anthropocentric Outlook):​

प्रकृति का मल्
ू य मख्
ु यतः उसके मानव उपयोगिता (consumption और production) के आधार
पर दे खा जाता है ।
 5.​ बाजार आधारित साधन (Market-Based Instruments):​
प्रदष
ू ण कर (Pollution Tax)
○​ सब्सिडी हटाना
○​ संपत्ति अधिकार (Property Rights)​
इन साधनों से पर्यावरणीय समस्याओं को “सध
ु ारा” जा सकता है ।

hi
2. पारिस्थितिक अर्थशास्त्र का दृष्टिकोण

t
as
पारिस्थितिक अर्थशास्त्र नव-शास्त्रीय मान्यताओं को चन
ु ौती दे ता है और मानव अर्थव्यवस्था को
प्राकृतिक पारिस्थितिकी तंत्र का हिस्सा (Subsystem) मानता है ।

प्रमख
ु मान्यताएँ:

w
1.​ अर्थव्यवस्था एक उप-प्रणाली (Economy as a Subsystem):​
aA
अर्थव्यवस्था प्राकृतिक संसाधनों और पर्यावरणीय सीमाओं (Biophysical Limits) पर निर्भर है ।
2.​ पारिस्थितिक सीमाएँ और मजबत
ू स्थिरता (Strong Sustainability):
○​ संसाधन सीमित हैं, इसलिए निरं तर आर्थिक विकास संभव नहीं।
○​ कुछ प्राकृतिक पंज
ू ी (जैसे – जैव विविधता, जलवायु संतल
ु न) का प्रतिस्थापन संभव नहीं।​
ic
3.​ प्रकृति का अंतर्निहित मल्
ू य (Intrinsic Value):​
on

पर्यावरण केवल मानव उपयोगिता का साधन नहीं है , बल्कि उसका अपना नैतिक और
पारिस्थितिक मल्
ू य है । उदाहरण: जंगल सिर्फ लकड़ी का स्रोत नहीं, बल्कि जैव विविधता का घर
भी है ।
4.​ बहुविषयी दृष्टिकोण (Interdisciplinary Approach):
M

○​ प्राकृतिक और सामाजिक विज्ञान का उपयोग​

5.​ लचीलापन और न्याय (Resilience & Distribution):

r.

○​ पारिस्थितिकी तंत्र की क्षमता को बनाए रखना।

○​ वर्तमान और भविष्य की पीढ़ियों के लिए न्यायपर्ण
ू संसाधन वितरण।​
D

6.​ बाजार समाधानों की आलोचना (Critique of Market Solutions):​

केवल बाजार साधन पर्यावरण को सरु क्षित नहीं कर सकते। गैर-बाजार समाधान और व्यापक
 नीतिगत बदलाव की ज़रूरत है ।​

3. तल
ु नात्मक सारणी (Neo-Classical vs Ecological Economics)

hi
दृष्टिकोण पर्यावरण पर समाधान का विकास की नीति मल्
ू य
नजरिया आधार धारणा उपकरण दृष्टिकोण

t
as
नव-शास्त्रीय संसाधन और बाजार अनंत विकास कर, सब्सिडी, मानव-केंद्रित
अर्थशास्त्र अपशिष्ट का स्रोत; आधारित संभव परमिट (Utilitarian)

w
प्रदष
ू ण = बाजार साधन,
विफलता तकनीकी
सध
aA
ु ार

पारिस्थितिक अर्थव्यवस्था = सावधानी, सीमित विकास संसाधन अंतर्निहित और

अर्थशास्त्र पारिस्थितिकी तंत्र प्रणालीगत (Ecological सीमा, नियम, नैतिक मल्
ू य
ic
का हिस्सा, सीमाएँ बदलाव Boundaries) सिस्टम
निश्चित ं ंग
थिकि
on

4. समानताएँ और अंतर
M

समानताएँ :

●​ दोनों ही संसाधनों के प्रबंधन और पर्यावरणीय समस्याओं को महत्व दे ते हैं।

●​ बाह्यताओं (Externalities) को पहचानते हैं।
r.

●​ स्थायी विकास (Sustainable Development) का लक्ष्य साझा है ।

D

मख्
ु य अंतर (Divergences):

1.​ विकास बनाम वद्

ृ धि (Growth vs Development):​
 ○​ नव-शास्त्रीय → तकनीक से अनंत वद्
ृ धि।
○​ पारिस्थितिक:सीमित वद्
ृ धि सीमित; असली विकास = जीवन की गुणवत्ता और न्याय।
2.​ नैतिक आधार (Ethics):
○​ नव-शास्त्रीय: मानव उपयोगिता पर आधारित।
○​ पारिस्थितिक: प्रकृति का स्वयं का मल्
ू य भी है ।

hi
3.​ नीति उपकरण (Policy Tools):​
नव-शास्त्रीय: कर, सब्सिडी, परमिट।

t
○​ पारिस्थितिक: संसाधन सीमा, नियम, प्रणालीगत परिवर्तन।

as
4.​ अनिश्चितता का दृष्टिकोण:
○​ नव-शास्त्रीय: दक्षता और मॉडल पर जोर।
○​ पारिस्थितिक: अनिश्चितता और दीर्घकालिक जोखिम पर सावधानी।

w
व्यावहारिक निष्कर्ष aA
●​ नव-शास्त्रीय अर्थशास्त्र: “बाजार और तकनीक सब हल कर दें गे।” प्रदष
ू ण को ठीक करने के लिए
उद्योगों पर कार्बन टै क्स लगाना।
●​ पारिस्थितिक अर्थशास्त्र: “प्रकृति की सीमाएँ हैं, हमें जीवनशैली और नीतियों में बनि
ु यादी बदलाव
करने होंगे।” कार्बन टै क्स के साथ-साथ नवीकरणीय ऊर्जा अपनाना और ऊर्जा खपत सीमित
ic
करना।​
बिलकुल। आपके दिए गए अंग्रेज़ी कंटें ट को मैं सरल, अकादमिक और व्यावहारिक हिंदी में
on

परिवर्तित कर रहा हूँ ताकि विद्यार्थी इसे आसानी से समझ सकें।

सततता की ओर सेत:ु मिश्रित दृष्टिकोण (Bridging the Divide:

M

Hybrid Approaches)

व्यवहार में आज यह मान्यता बढ़ रही है कि सतत विकास (Sustainable development ) के लिए
r.

पर्यावरण, समाज और अर्थव्यवस्था — इन तीनों आयामों का संतलि

ु त समन्वय आवश्यक है । इसे ही
“सततता के तीन स्तंभ” (Three-Pillar Concept of Sustainability) कहा जाता है ।
D

●​ प्राकृतिक संसाधनों (Natural Capital) का मल्

ू यांकन और लागत-लाभ विश्लेषण (Cost-Benefit
Analysis) को पर्यावरण नीतियों में शामिल करने के प्रयास अक्सर यह दर्शाते हैं कि पारं परिक
 नवशास्त्रीय अर्थशास्त्र (Neoclassical Economics) की विधियों को पारिस्थितिक सीमाओं
(Ecological Constraints) के साथ जोड़ा जा रहा है ।
●​ हालाँकि, पारिस्थितिक अर्थशास्त्र (Ecological Economics) का मानना है कि केवल ये उपकरण
(Tools) पर्याप्त नहीं हैं।
●​ दोनों दृष्टिकोण अब इस बात पर सहमत हो रहे हैं कि बहुविषयक (Interdisciplinary) शोध, जो

hi
नीतिगत सझ
ु ाव दे ने में सहायक हो, अत्यंत ज़रूरी है ।
●​ इन दोनों में मल्
ू यांकन की कुछ समान विधियाँ (Valuation Techniques) और "शद्
ु ध वद्
ृ धि"

t
(Pure Growth) रणनीति की आलोचना समान रूप से मिलती है ।

as
निष्कर्ष (Conclusion):​
नवशास्त्रीय और पारिस्थितिक अर्थशास्त्र का साझा उद्दे श्य सततता और संसाधनों का कुशल उपयोग है ।

w
लेकिन दोनों के मान्यताओं, नैतिक आधारों और नीतिगत सझ
ु ावों में अंतर है । इन दोनों के बीच चल रही
निरं तर संवाद प्रक्रिया (Dialogue) ने पर्यावरणीय आर्थिक विश्लेषण और नीतिनिर्माण को और समद्
ृ ध
किया है ।
aA
पदार्थ संतल
ु न मॉडल (The Material Balance Model)
ic
पदार्थ संतल
ु न मॉडल (Material Balance Model) पर्यावरणीय अर्थशास्त्र का एक मल
ू भत
ू सिद्धांत है ।
on

यह बताता है कि अर्थव्यवस्था और पर्यावरण के बीच का संबंध परू ी तरह भौतिक नियमों (Physical
Laws) पर आधारित है ।

इसका आधार है ऊष्मागतिकी का प्रथम नियम (First Law of Thermodynamics) - “पदार्थ और ऊर्जा
M

को न तो बनाया जा सकता है और न ही नष्ट किया जा सकता है । यह केवल एक रूप से दस

ू रे रूप में
परिवर्तित होता है ।”

अर्थात, उत्पादन और उपभोग की प्रत्येक प्रक्रिया में जितना पदार्थ पर्यावरण से निकाला जाता है , अंततः
r.

वही या तो उपयोगी वस्तु बनता है या अपशिष्ट (Waste/Residuals) के रूप में वापस पर्यावरण में लौटता
है ।
D
 t hi
as
w
मख्
ु य विशेषताएँ (Core Features)

1.​ संसाधन प्रवाह (Resource Flow):

aA
○​ सभी कच्चे माल (Raw Materials) — चाहे नवीकरणीय (Renewable) हों या
अनवीकरणीय (Non-Renewable) — पर्यावरण से ही आते हैं।
○​ इन्हें उत्पादन क्षेत्र (Industries) और अंततः उपभोक्ताओं (Households) द्वारा प्रयोग
ic
किया जाता है ।
2.​ अपशिष्ट उत्पादन (Waste Generation):
○​ उत्पादन और उपभोग दोनों से अपशिष्ट निकलता है — जैसे प्रदष
ू ण, धआ
ु ,ँ गंदा पानी,
on

कचरा आदि।
3.​ द्रव्य संतल
ु न (Mass Balance):
○​ कुल इनपट
ु (Inputs) = कुल आउटपट
ु (Outputs) + अपशिष्ट (Residuals)
M

○​ यानी पर्यावरण से जितना निकाला गया, उतना ही अंततः किसी न किसी रूप में वापस
लौटता है ।
4.​ अपशिष्ट अवशोषण (Waste Assimilation):
○​ पर्यावरण में कुछ हद तक अपशिष्ट को अवशोषित या पन
ु र्चक्रित (Recycle) करने की
r.

क्षमता होती है ।
D

○​ लेकिन इसकी सीमा है ; यदि अपशिष्ट अधिक हो जाए तो प्रदष

ू ण और पर्यावरणीय क्षति
बढ़ती है ।
 ु न नियम का पर्यावरणीय अर्थशास्त्र में महत्व (Implications for
पदार्थ संतल
Environmental Economics)

●​ अर्थव्यवस्था और पर्यावरण को जोड़ता है :​

यह मॉडल पारं परिक "chakriya प्रवाह मॉडल" (Circular Flow Model) से अलग है क्योंकि इसमें

hi
सिर्फ़ वस्तओ
ु ं और धन का ही नहीं, बल्कि पदार्थ और ऊर्जा का प्रवाह भी शामिल है ।​

t
●​ नीतिगत महत्व (Policy Relevance):​

as
सरकारें और नीति निर्माता इस मॉडल के आधार पर
○​ संसाधन उपयोग कम करने,
○​ पन
ु र्चक्रण (Recycling) को बढ़ावा दे ने,

w
○​ और अपशिष्ट प्रबंधन (Waste Management)​
जैसी नीतियाँ बना सकते हैं।
aA
●​ बाह्य प्रभाव (Externalities):​
हर प्रकार का अपशिष्ट अंततः पर्यावरण को प्रभावित करता है , इसलिए प्रदष
ू ण जैसी समस्याएँ
अर्थव्यवस्था की अंतर्निहित (Inherent) समस्या हैं।​
ic
इस नियम के व्यावहारिक उपयोग (Applications)
on

1.​ संसाधन एवं अपशिष्ट लेखांकन (Resource and Waste Accounting):

○​ कितनी ऊर्जा और सामग्री प्रयोग हुई तथा कितना अपशिष्ट निकला, इसका लेखा-जोखा
रखने में मदद।
2.​ ईको-प्रभावशीलता मापन (Eco-Efficiency Measurement):
M

○​ यह समझने में कि उत्पादन प्रक्रिया कितनी कुशल है और उसमें कितनी बचत की

संभावना है ।
3.​ पर्यावरणीय प्रभाव आकलन (Environmental Impact Assessment):
r.

○​ किसी परियोजना या उद्योग का पर्यावरण पर प्रभाव समझने और कम करने में सहायक।

D

संक्षेप में

सामग्री संतल
ु न मॉडल हमें यह सिखाता है कि —
 ●​ संसाधन और अपशिष्ट का प्रवाह अनिवार्य है ।
●​ पर्यावरण की सीमित क्षमता को ध्यान में रखे बिना विकास संभव नहीं।
●​ इसलिए सतत विकास (Sustainable Development) के लिए संसाधनों का संयमित उपयोग और
अपशिष्ट प्रबंधन आवश्यक है ।

t hi
as
w
aA
ic
on
M
r.
D