0% found this document useful (0 votes)
119 views56 pages

JTAC Evaluator's Guide 2019

The document is an Evaluator's Guide for Joint Terminal Attack Controllers (JTAC) from 2019, detailing preparation, evaluation scenarios, and grading criteria for JTAC assessments. It outlines necessary equipment, mission timelines, and considerations for evaluating proficiency in various combat situations. The guide emphasizes safety, procedural correctness, and the responsibilities of both evaluators and examinees during the evaluation process.

Uploaded by

tnzb2gp6nx
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
119 views56 pages

JTAC Evaluator's Guide 2019

The document is an Evaluator's Guide for Joint Terminal Attack Controllers (JTAC) from 2019, detailing preparation, evaluation scenarios, and grading criteria for JTAC assessments. It outlines necessary equipment, mission timelines, and considerations for evaluating proficiency in various combat situations. The guide emphasizes safety, procedural correctness, and the responsibilities of both evaluators and examinees during the evaluation process.

Uploaded by

tnzb2gp6nx
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

1ST SFC (A)

Joint Terminal Attack Controller


Evaluator’s Guide
2019

DOMINATE PROFESSIONALLY UP FRONT!!

Last update: 10 NOV 19

1
A. PREPARE FOR THE EVALUATION
® Evaluator Backside Checklist:
¨ Backside Brief (GFC and assets)
¨ Shell COF Package with intel, mission, composition of force, available resources and assets to be
utilized during execution
¨ ATO (if required)
¨ Scenario Sheet
¨ Inject Card
o Do your homework for what your injects warrant via JFIRE and JPUB? Know what you are
talking about!!!
¨ Intrernal Comms plan
¨ .kmz overlay

® Mission Timeline (Established by the Evaluee - Backwards planned off of the Live asset times)
o Showtime
o Roll Call/Time Hack
o Product distribution (COF/GRGs/ATAK ovrlays/maps/GRGs)
o WARNO/Mission overview Brief
o Planning window
o Commander’s Backbrief
o Air Mission Brief (Co-located crews or Dislocated crews)
o COMEX (Voice / VDL / Data)
o SP (A/C Takeoff / GAF or HAF W/U)
o Mission Window
o NLT Exfil
o Formal Debrief
o Evaluee/Evaluator debrief

® Scenario Considerations:
¨ What is the proficiency level of the JTAC being evaluated?
¨ What areas should you focus on to evaluate the JTAC?
¨ How realistic is your scenario for what the JTAC is going to do operationally?
¨ Does your scenario evaluate your assessed risk to the command in his abilitys to perform
duties?
¨ What is your intent for Collateral Damage and RED/MSD?
¨ Plan your Targets of Opportunity based off of expected Scheme of Manuever (SOM)? Plan this
by phase, i.e infil, actions on, exfil (i.e, IED, TIC, single target, multiple target engagements, Target
ID, etc).
o Pre plan your backside overlay to include the types of targets. This provides you more
bandwidth during execution to focus on the JTAC and identify any safety concerns.
o Remain flexible through execution to meet your evaluation intent, but the preparation
you do up front prevents any potential safety situations and ensures you accurately
assess the JTAC being evaluated.

® Scenario Examples on next 3 page!

2
Terrain: MOUT Range/MOA/Open Range
Difficulty: Low
SF Semi-Permissive #1
Combat Advisor w/HN TIC

Friendly Situation: SFOD-A XXXX is conducting a Partner Development Program (PDP)


mission. The Host Nation (HN) forces that are being trained get into a TIC. ODA stages from
team house and has assets being pushed to them below. MQ-1 is enroute with sensors and
weapons. Team has organic 60mm mortar. Team is removed from HN forces in contact due
to ROE.

Enemy Situation: Boko Haram fighters (BH) have attacked Nigerien forces and have small
arms, MAN PADS, and IDF. BH has a much larger force and has pinned down the HN. Semi-
permissive environment's ROE is strict, and every strike must be approved by GFC.

Mission: SFOD-A XXXX provides intelligence and contingency Close Air and Fire Support at
XX MMM YYYY at DTG IOT allow HN freedom of maneuver and break contact.

Notes on Execution: ODA must stay behind contact and primary mission is to relay ISR
feedback to HN to allow break of contact. CAS and IDF are authorized only to avoid
catastrophic losses or defend ODA. ROE states GFC must assume responsibility for all
strikes. Intent is to do mostly Type 2 controls and involve GFC in all decisions/information.

Assets: 1 x Fighter/Bomber Flight (minimum) 1 x MQ-9


(real or notional)
1 x 60mm (real or notional) Any other
actual assets

Needed Equipment: Organic Commo (PRC-152A/117G/148)


1 x NVGs and IR Pointer (if night) Patrol Kit
(Chest Rack/Ruck, etc.) 1 x PSN-13A DAGR
MAP

Optional Equipment: DACAS software/tablet


1 x VOL receiver 1 x
LRF/HHPTD

Command and Signal: Freqs based on range restrictions. JTAC co-located with GFC. GFC
may be JTAC-E.

3
Terrain: MOUT Range/MOA/Open Range
Difficulty: Medium
SF Semi-Permissive #2
Defense of Team Compound

Friendly Situation: SFOD-A XXXX is conducting a Partner Development Program (PDP) mission. The FARC
are attacking the team's compound with overwhelming force. ODA is stationary at team house and
assets are being pushed to them as available. Team has organic 60mm mortar. Team is pinned down and
stationary until E&E plan commences.

Enemy Situation: FARC fighters have attacked the ODA and have small arms, MANPADS, and IDF. The
FARC has a much larger force and has pinned down the ODA in the compound. Semi-permissive
environment's COE is high but ODA is approved to use all means necessary to defend.

Mission: SFOD-A XXXX defends against FARC attack utilizing Close Air and Fire Support at XX MMM YYYY
at DTG.

Notes on Execution: ODA is stationary until they E&E and must manage many targets at once. CAS and
IDF are authorized to defend ODA and position. Intent is to do mostly Type 1 controls and shift focus to
different targets of priority. CCAS is optimal for this scenario for multiple asset capability.

Assets: 1 x Fighter/Bomber Flight (Minimum)


1 x C-12 ISR Platform (Real or Notional)
1 x 60mm (Real or Notional)
2 x other CAS flight (Real or Notional)

Needed Equipment: Organic Commo (PRC-152A/117G/148)


1 x NVGs and IR Pointer (if Night)
Patrol Kit or Assault Kit
1 x PSN-13A DAGR
MAP
1 x LRF/HHPTD

Optional Equipment: DACAS software/tablet


1 x VDL Receiver
GRG’s/ Terrain Sketch

Command and Signal: Freqs based on range restrictions. JTAC co-located with GFC. GFC may be JTAC-E.
Use multiple TADs, if able.

4
Terrain: Large Range
Difficulty: Medium-High
SF Special Reconnaissance #3
SF SR and Main Effort compromised by QRF

Friendly Situation: SFOD-A XXXX is conducting a Special Reconnaissance mission on Hamas safe-house
ISO of CIF mission. ODA has been over-watching OBJ for 72 hours and trigger of senior Hamas leadership
arrival has been met for CIF to hit OBJ. JTAC and snipers are stationary at OP and remaining ODA is at
MSS. Battery of 155mm is available and has established TRPs and pre-planned targets. Team has CAS
platforms on standby JOT support main effort or aid SR in breaking contact if compromised.

Enemy Situation: Hamas safe house has a small contingent securing location and preparing defenses.
Fighters have MAN PADS and there is a suspected SA-9 threat in the area. Hamas leader arrives with 2 x
armed PSD and MAN PADS are confirmed.
Leader has egress vehicle waiting (plane or wheeled vehicle). There is a large QRF approximately 20
minutes away and are heavily armed.

Mission: SFOD-A XXXX conducts SR ISO CIF at DTG IVO XX MMM YYYY IOT confirm or deny location of
Hamas senior leadership.

Notes on Execution: Intent is to have JTAC constantly update GFC w/ situational updates. Main Effort is
on OBJ and is conducting SSE when QRF arrives; GFC decides to use CAS to eliminated QRF before they
arrive at OBJ strike. Take out SA threats using IDF as they present themselves. FLOT is constantly shifting
to break contact and get exfil.

Assets: 1 x Fighter/Bomber Flight (Minimum)


1 x RQ-4 (Real or Notional)
2 x RW exfil asset (Real or Notional)
6 x 155mm Artillery (Real or Notional)
Any other actual Asset

Needed Equipment: Organic Commo (PRC-152A/117G/148)


1 x NVGs and IR Pointer (if Night)
Patrol Kit or Assault Kit
1 x PSN-13A DAGR
MAP
1 x LRF/HHPTD
1 x SOFLAM/HLM

Optional Equipment: DACAS software/tablet


1 x VDL Receiver

5
6
B. PRE-EVALUATION EVALUATOR INSPECTIONS
¨ Inspect examinee’s AJACTS profile to ensure all IQT/MQT/CT currencies and academic requirements
are met and IAW USSOCOM M 350-5 (13 NOV 18)
¨ Ground Phase MQF completed NET 30 days / NLT 24 hrs prior to Control Phase with a score of 80%
or better (re-tests can be NET 24 hrs)

C. PRE-EVALUATION BRIEFING
® Brief the type of evaluation and the intended objective
¨ INITIAL-“The obj of this evaluation is to make sure that you are capable of maintaining good SA
while procedurely and safely employing FW assets on multiple targets of opportunity.” This will be
conducted as an FMP and you will be required to coordinate with the GFC to meet his intent.

¨ RECURRING-“The obj of this evaluation is to ensure that you are capable of planning and executing a
scenario for combat operations that includes integrating and deconflicting assets in different
situations; maintaining overall SA of assets and groundforces, while procedurely and safely
employing FW assets on multiple targets of opportunity.”

¨ RE-QUALIFICATION-“The obj of this evaluation is to ensure that you procedurely and safely perform
your dutie as a JTAC IOT requalify your CMR currecncy”

¨ SPOT-“The obj of this evaluation is to ensure you are able to perform safely and procedurely correct
JTAC, JTAC-I or JTAC-E duties……”

¨ NO NOTICE- “The purpose of this evaluation is to show that you are operationally prepared to safely
and procedurely function as a JTAC ISO of unit directives and command compliance.

¨ JTAC-I-“The purpose of this eval is to ensure that you are authorized to instruct, train, and execute
CAS with a trainee throughout a live fly ensuring safety and procedural control of aircraft are
efficient to meet the GFC intent.“

¨ JTAC-E-“The purpose of this eval is to ensure you are capable of assessing performance while
administering a JTAC evaluation during a realistic scenario, ensuring safety of flight, debriefing
accurately and utilizing effective grading criteria.

® Brief all relevant evaluation areas from Table A-1


¨ JTAC (Areas 1-25)
¨ JTAC-I (Areas 26.1-26.11)
¨ JTAC-E (Areas 27.1-27.8)

® Brief the Grading Criteria


o “Q” The desired level of performance. The examinee demonstrates a satisfactory knowledge of
required information, performing SOF JTAC duties w/in the prescribed tolerances and
accomplished the assigned mission.
o Area 12- JTAC flawlessly deconflicted multiple assets within the ROZ, resulting in safe and
timely employment nd integration of fires.
o Area 4- JTAC demonstrated a thorough understanding and knowledge of how to properly
operate their GPS.

7
o “Q-“ Indicates that the Examinee is qualified to perform the assigned area/subarea tasks, but
requires debriefing oradditional training as determined by the SOF JTAC-E. Deviations from
established standards must not exceed the prescribed “Q-“ tolerances or jeopardize safety.
o Area 21- JTAC did not know all of the terminology used during Laser Operations. For
example what the brevity code “SHIFT” meant IRT Laser Operations.
o Area 14- JTAC was flustered and caused some confusion while passing SITUPDATE , 9-line,
and during the talk-on but managed to pass all of the required information to accomplish
the mission.

o “U” Indicates the Examinee is unqualified to perform the assigned task area and requires
additional training. A “U” will be assigned in any area for procedures that adversely affected
mission accomplishment or compromised safety.
o Area 10- JTAC did not get the GFC’s authority to drop prior to wpn’s release.
o Area 10- JTAC did not inform the GFC of the risk to friendly forces in a danger close situation.
o Area 12/24- JTAC put two assets at the same altitude in the ROZ, causing a safety of flight
issue.
o Area 15- JTAC did not understand RED and exposed friendlies to unacceptable risk.

® Brief the Examinee the areas which constitute failure.


¨ A “U” in any defined critical area (Safety in Areas 25 JTAC or 26.11 JTAC-I)
¨ More than one “U” in any non-critical area
¨ A combination of more than three downgrades
¨ Overall performance would make mission accomplishment questionable
¨ Violations of regs or directives that would jeopardize safety. Operated in a dangerous manner
¨ 3xQ = GO / 4xQ = NO-GO / 1U = GO (if not Safety) / 2xU = NO-GO

® Brief the Examinee their responsibilities:


¨ Examinee makes all decisions and responsible for all actions.
¨ Do not assume anything.
¨ Ensure you are operating in a procedurally correct manner.
¨ Notify JTAC-E of any known problems or deviations prior to evaluation.
¨ Ensure that the Evaluator is present for ALL coordinated tasks. (e.g. Supporting asset and
controller coordination)

® Brief to the Examinee that “Safety is Paramount”


¨ If an emergency occurs, the Evaluator will be involved until it is resolved. Continuation of the
evaluation will be at the Evaluator’s discretion.
¨ The evaluation will be terminated if safety is compromised.

® Brief evaluee to bring any reference materials he thinks he may need

® Brief what you will be taking notes throughout the evaluation and not to let this distract the
Evaluatee. Not all note taking is for bad reasons.

® Set a pre-mission briefing time for the evaluatee to brief the JTAC-E and begin the evaluation.

® Make sure the Evaluee understands what is expected of them.

8
® Ensure Examinee has no questions and no doubt about when the eval will take place and where he
is to report to on the day of the evaluation.

® Brief that you will tell the Examinee exactly when the evaluation starts and when it is complete.
The Examinee should stay in scenario until you tell him it is over

D. SCENARIO BRIEF
® Brief the Examinee type of scenario being used for evaluation (GAF, HAF, BAF – K/C, H/R, RECCE)
¨ Utilize the CONOP package you worked so hard on to brief the JTAC, stay on task.

® Brief the Examinee who will be acting as what agencies.


¨ “I/he will be the…” GFC, JFO, S3, S2, ISR, ARTY, RW”
¨ Duty Positions
¨ Evaluator
¨ Evaluee (JTAC/JTAC-I/JTAC-E)
¨ Truth Data
¨ GFC (Pre-Coord Scheme of Manuever w/ GFC prior to WARNO/CDR’s BB)
¨ Notional Assets
– Arty/Mortars
– NSFS
– ISR/RPA
– RW
– AC-130
– FW CAS
– EW
¨ Vehicle Driver
¨ All untasked personnel can be tasked by the Evaluee

® Evaluation Equipment List


o Vehicle
o Products (COF/GRG @ a minimum)
o Pubs and Cheat shets (J-Pub/J-Fire/RED ref sheet)
o Radios
o VDL system (7800/TRE)
o PSN-13 DAGR
o ATAK/WINTAK EUD
o Compass
o Supplemental map
o Marking devices (day/night – friendly/target)
o Trellis/MPU/GoTenna devices

Expectation management for the Examinee:


o As the GFC, I will tell you my overall intent and ground SOM. I expect you to establish the best
fires, sensor and stack. During the scenario I will identify threats and drive the scenario for TOO.
It is your responsibility to advise me of the best weaponeering solution, ground SOM
considerations (FB, DC, RED) and deconfliciton plan. I may deny your recommendations to force
fundamental work through procedural control of specific assets. Do not let this distract you
from focusing from executing holistic integration of fires in a timely manner. Ensure that you
maintain positive control, SA, safety and timeliness of procedures throughout.

9
o JTAC EVALUATION CRITERIA
TABLE A-1: SOF JTAC EVALUATION CRITERIA
Q Q- U
Area 1. Checked all factors Minor errors of Major error of omission or
Mission Planning applicable to mission (i.e. ATO, omission/commission commission precluded mission
weather, timing, frequencies, map that did not detract accomplishment or unnecessarily
datum, range procedures, call signs, from mission endangered personnel or
airspace and special requirements). effectiveness. Need for equipment.
Aware of alternatives if mission study in some areas is
cannot be completed as planned. indicated.
Area 2. All equipment needed for mission Minor errors of Major error of omission or
Equipment accomplishment properly prepared Omission/commission commission precluded mission
Preparation and inspected. Unsatisfactory items that did not detract accomplishment or unnecessarily
identified and appropriate corrective from mission endangered personnel or
actions taken. effectiveness. Need for equipment.
study in some areas is
indicated.
Area 3. Able to operate all required Minor errors of Major error of omission or
Communications ommunications secure and non- omission/commission commission precluded mission
Equipment secure necessary for requesting, that did not detract accomplishment or unnecessarily
Operations coordinating and controlling CAS. from mission endangered personnel or
effectiveness. Need for equipment.
study in some areas is
indicated.
Area 4. Successfully turned on, Minor errors of Unsuccessfully turned on,
Global Positioning initialized and performed omission/commission initialized and/or perated
System Operations operator checks. Able to that did not detract GPS. Unable to determine
determine individual location using from mission individual location using MGRS
MGRS and Lat/long in effectiveness. Need for and Latitude/longitude in
seconds and decimal minutes. Able study in some areas is seconds and decimal minutes.
to determine distant location using indicated. Unable to determine distant
slant range calculations from a location using slant range
known point to an unknown point. calculations from known point to
Properly loaded waypoints. Able to an unknown point. Unable to
properly load encryption fill. Able to properly load waypoints. Unable
configure GPS to proper map to properly load encryption fill.
datum/ellipsoid and convert Unable to
coordinates between map datums. configure GPS to proper map
Demonstrates complete datum ellipsoid or convert
knowledge of batter fault coordinates between map
conditions/procedures. datums. Unable to explain battery
fault conditions/ procedures.
Area 5. Communications clear, Minor errors of Deviation from acceptable
Transmit/Receive concise, and understandable. omission/commission communications procedures
Procedures Promoted mission effectiveness. that did not detract impaired mission effectiveness.
from mission
effectiveness. Need for
study in some areas is
indicated.
Area 6. Demonstrated in-depth Minor errors of Unfamiliar with CAS request
CAS Request knowledge of CAS request omission/commission procedures. Unable to properly or
Submission procedures. Submitted the request that did not detract effectively compile,
in a timely, thorough, and effective from mission prepare, and transmit CAS
manner. effectiveness. Need for requests.
study in some areas is
indicated.

10
Area 7. Analyzed target for CAS Minor errors of Could not recommend
Target Analysis employment procedures omission/commission appropriate CAS employment
(i.e.) ID, description, locations, that did not detract procedures for the target. Errors
suitability, and collateral damage). from mission that precluded mission
effectiveness. Need for accomplishment or unnecessarily
study in some areas is endangered personnel or
indicated. equipment.
Area 8. Recognized ground to air Minor errors of Failed to recognize ground to air
Threat Analysis threats capable of engaging CAS omission/commission threats capable of engaging
aircraft. Plan mitigated threat to the that did not detract CAS aircraft. Plan did not
survivability of the aircraft. from mission mitigate threat to the
effectiveness. Need for survivability of the aircraft.
study in some areas is
indicated.
Area 9. Demonstrated timely Minor errors of Coordination with appropriate
Ground Force Staff coordination procedures omission/commission that agencies not completed before attack
Coordination with appropriate ground did not detract from commenced. Delays caused by
force staff agencies (i.e. mission effectiveness. untimely
S-2, S-3, FSE, NSFS, ADA, Need for study in some coordination degraded or
Aviation LNOs, etc.). areas is indicated. prevented successful mission
accomplishment.
Area 10. Demonstrated timely Minor errors of Did not adequately coordinate with
Ground Force coordination with ground omission/commission that ground
Commander commander or designated did not detract from commander/designated
Coordination representative. Accurately explained to mission effectiveness. representative. Provided
the ground commander CAS mission Need for study in some inaccurate data regarding CAS mission
data and dangers to friendly areas is indicated. data/dangers to friendly forces. The
forces. Understood ground commander's information provided or not provided
scheme of maneuver. Requested timely impacted mission effectiveness or
ground commander attack clearance. exposed friendly forces to
hazards. Didn't request or
receive ground commander attack
clearance prior to
weapons release.
Area 11. Demonstrated timely Slow to coordinate fire Did not coordinate fire support. Did
Fire Support and coordination for fire support (i.e. SEAD). support. Recognized but not recognize or deconflict
Airspace Recognized and deconflicted attack didn’t deconflict attack attack aircraft with formal and
aircraft with formal or aircraft with formal or informal airspace control measures.
Management
informal airspace informal airspace control
coordination measures. measures. Did not impact
mission or aircraft
survivability.
Area 12. Integrate attack aircraft Minor errors of Did not recognize or integrate attack
Airspace with formal or informal omission/commission that aircraft with formal and informal
Management airspace coordination did not detract from airspace control measures.
measures. mission effectiveness.
Need for study in some
areas is indicated.
Area 13. Thorough working Minor errors of Not familiar with signaling devices.
Use of Signaling knowledge of signaling omission/commission that Use of signaling devise inappropriate
Devices devices day/night. Selected most did not detract from to tactical
appropriate device for tactical situation. mission effectiveness. situation.
Enhanced mission effectiveness. Need for study in some
areas is indicated.
Area 14. Provided the attack aircraft via voice or Minor errors of Briefing compromised safety or
SOF JTAC to CAS data transmission, with a complete, omission/commission that mission effectiveness due to
Aircraft Briefing concise, and effective briefing with did not detract from erroneous information or errors of
enhanced mission mission effectiveness. mission/commission.
effectiveness i.e., CAS 9- Need for study in some Tactics briefed inappropriate
line or theater specific areas is indicated. situation and precluded
briefing, and mission checkin. effective mission completion and
jeopardized survivability.

11
Area 14.1. Thoroughly understood and utilized Minor errors of Failed to understand and/or utilize
Digitally Aided digital systems to aid the Fires delivery omission/commission that Digitally Aided CAS/Fires equipment in
CAS/Fires systems process. Able to generate target did not detract from any capacity.
coordinated, receive OSR, send 9-line, mission effectiveness.
track A/C, send BDA, conduct CFF and Need for study in some
integrate applicable FSCMs, ACMs and areas is indicated.
closest riendly position on equipment
display.
Area 15. Demonstrated thorough Minor errors of Discrepancies in knowledge and/or
Attack Weapons knowledge of weapons omission/commission that employment with impact
Utilization characteristics, capabilities, and effects. did not detract from on mission effectiveness. Did not
Used weapons most suitable to target. mission effectiveness. understand risk-estimate distances,
Employed weapons in the Need for study in some and exposed friendly forces to
correct manner. Considered aircraft and areas is indicated. unacceptable risk. Failed to achieve
ground forces survivability. Delivery desired results (due to JTAC's
sequence of ordinance enhanced mission action/inaction). Mission
effectiveness. Understood risk-estimate resulted in unwanted collateral
distances. damage.
Area 16. Exercised thorough Minor errors of Did not recognize or integrate attack
CAS Aircraft situational awareness and omission/commission that aircraft with formal and informal
Control control of assigned aircraft throughout did not detract from airspace control measures.
mission. Clearance or aborts issued in a mission effectiveness.
positive and timely manner. Need for study in some
Reestablished abort code after aborting areas is indicated.
an attack.
Area 17. Ordinance adjust instructions were clear, Minor errors of Adjustment instructions were not
Ordnance concise, and timely. All omission/commission that timely, clear, and accurate or were
Adjustment attack restrictions placed on attack did not detract from unsafe. Actions resulted in either
aircraft were mission effectiveness. degraded or
appropriate and necessary. Need for study in some ineffective mission.
areas is indicated.
Area 18. Battle damage assessment was realistic, Minor errors of Unrealistic. Reports contained major
Post Attack accurate, and timely. Attack flight and omission/commission that errors or omissions. Reports were not
Assessment appropriate agencies were provided a did not detract from timely.
concise report in accordance with the mission effectiveness.
governing directives. Need for study in some
areas is indicated.
Area 19. Complied with all area Minor errors of Violated range procedures. Was not
Area Procedures procedures, range/MOA safety omission/commission that knowledgeable of range
requirements and did not detract from requirements. Incomplete knowledge
restrictions. Knowledgeable of mission effectiveness. of
emergency procedures ([Link] bombs, Need for study in some emergency procedures. Gave
off range release, fire on range, areas is indicated. incomplete restrictions to fighters.
MEDEVAC, etc.) Ensured aircraft briefed
on applicable restrictions.
Area 20. Readily understood Minor errors of Failed to understand
FAC(A)/JTAC FAC(A)/JTAC requests omission/commission that FAC(A)/JTAC requests. Did not provide
Interface and promptly provided did not detract from required data. Hampered the mission
information mission effectiveness. effectiveness of the FAC(A)/JTAC
Need for study in some
areas is indicated.
Area 21. Readily understood Minor errors of Actions caused unsafe terminal
Laser Operations procedures (target distance, safety zone, omission/commission that environment or deficiencies noted
etc.) from an effective location, using did not detract from precluded mission success.
proper LTD code, terminology and timely mission effectiveness.
coordination. Need for study in some
areas is indicated.
Area 22. Readily understood and utilized IR Minor errors of Actions caused unsafe terminal
IR Pointer Pointer omission/commission that environment or deficiencies noted
Operations procedures from an did not detract from precluded mission success.
effective location, using proper IR mission effectiveness.
Pointer Need for study in some
terminology and timely areas is indicated.
coordination

12
Area 23. Readily understood inertial aided Minor errors of Actions caused unsafe terminal
Inertial Aided munitions procedures (Coordinate omission/commission that environment or deficiencies noted
Munitions format, coordinate reliability, target did not detract from precluded mission success.
elevation, final attack clearance, and mission effectiveness.
Operations
final attack headings/angle). Need for study in some
areas is indicated.
Area 24. Readily understood night CAS Minor errors of Actions caused unsafe terminal
Night CAS procedures and tactics that enhanced omission/commission that environment or deficiencies noted
Operations mission effectiveness did not detract from precluded mission success.
mission effectiveness.
Need for study in some
areas is indicated.
Area 25. Employed all available Any dangerous act.
Safety methods to ensure safety of flight and Disregarded safety procedures. Did
(CRITICAL) ground personnel. Analyzed emergency not use equipment in a safe manner.
situations and implemented emergency Did not comply with safety
procedures. Used equipment, to include requirements.
signaling devices, laser target
designators and IR marking devices, in a
safe manner

Unobserved Questions:
TASK AREA 4 (GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM OPERATIONS – Technical Manual 11-5820-1172-13; AN/PSN -13/13A DAGR):
1. Determine individual location using MGRS and L/L in seconds and decimal minutes.
2. Explain and demonstrate the procedure to load and store a waypoint.
3. Explain and demonstrate the ability to determine slant range calculations from a known point to an unknown point.
4. Explain and demonstrate the ability to configure DAGR to proper map datum/ellipsoid and convert coordinates between map
datums.

TASK AREA 6 (CAS REQUEST SUBMISSION – JP 3-09.3; 27a-b / Appendix A):


1. Explain the formal CAS request process.
2. Name the two types of CAS requests and explain what is required for each to request a CAS asset.
3. What specific information needs to be captured in the DD1972/JTAR and who processes it?

TASK AREA 13 (USE OF SIGNALING DEVICES JP 3-09.3; IV-14d):


1. Name all available daytime marking systems for friendly positions and reference/target locations.
2. Name all available nighttime marking systems for friendly positions and reference/target locations.
3. Explain what means and aircraft have to identify/confirm friendly position marking and reference/target locations.

TASK AREA 14.1 (DIGITALLY-AIDED CAS/FIRES SYSTEMs - JP3-09.3, III-109, 21 a-d / III-109; 21 a-h / IV-15a-d / Appendix D):
1. What are the advantages and disadvantages of using digitally-aided CAS?
2. What term(s)/pro-words describe good connectivity to the digital network and no connection to the digital network?
3. What publication can be referenced for digital and digitally-aided CAS?

TASK AREA 20 (FAC-A/JTAC INTERFACE – JP 3-09.3 V-55, 5 a-k):


1. What are the four responsibilities associated with utilization of a FAC (A)?
2. Does the JTAC have to relinquish all of those responsibilities?
3. Can a FAC (A) work FAC duties within their respective flight?

TASK AREA 21 (LASER OPERATIONS - JP 3-09.3 III-52; 13 a1-8):


1. What is the standard laser brevity flow?
2. Explain the Laser Safety zone and the Optimal Attack Zones?
3. Are laser employments a method of BOC or BOT attack? Explain.

TASK AREA 22 (IR POINTER OPERATIONS – JP 3-09.3; Appendix C):


1. What are the two most critical elements of information that must be shared when using an IR pointer?
2. What supporting asset systems can identify an IR pointer?
3. What proword terminologies are applied to IR pointer operations?

TASK AREA 24 (NIGHT CAS OPERATIONS – JP 3-09.3; Various sections / Appendix C):
1. Name three considerations applicable to night CAS operations.
2. Discuss the advantages of conducting nigh CAS operations.
3. Discuss the disadvantages of conducting night CAS operations.

13
o JTAC-I GRADING CRITERIA
**Use the following grading area to conduct the recurring SOF JTAC-I Evaluations. A grade of "U" in
any area will require an overall rating of Unqualified.
TABLE A-1: SOF JTAC INSTRUCTOR EVALUATION CRITERIA
AREA 26 Q Q- U
Area 26.1 All equipment needed for Minor errors did not Major error precluded
Equipment mission accomplishment detract from mission accomplishment or
Preparation properly prepared and mission/training unnecessarily endangered
inspected. Unsatisfactory effectiveness. personnel or equipment.
items identified and
appropriate corrective
actions taken.
Area 26.2 Thoroughly briefed the Minor errors did not Major omissions precluded
Lesson Overview with lesson overview and clearly stated detract from mission/training success.
Statement of the objective. mission/training
Objectives effectiveness.
Area 26.3 Assured student understood Minor errors did not Instruction was ineffective,
Instruction material and relationship to job detract from precluded mission/training
Effectiveness performance. mission/training success.
effectiveness.
Area 26.4 Thoroughly explained Minor errors did not Confused procedures with
Identified Procedures instructions as procedures and detract from techniques, precluded
vs Techniques technical methods as techniques. mission/training mission/training success.
effectiveness.
Area 26.5 Training aids were used in a Minor errors did not Training aids were omitted,
Training Aids manner that enhanced the training detract from precluded mission/training
outcome. mission/training success.
effectiveness.
Area 26.6 Demonstrated thorough Minor errors did not Lack of knowledge or could
Knowledge of Subject knowledge of the subject detract from not provide examples,
Matter matter and used examples to mission/training precluded mission/training
clarify/enhance subject effectiveness. effectiveness.
areas.
Area 26.7 Communications clear, Minor errors did not Unacceptable
Communication concise, and understandable. detract from communications
Promoted effective training. mission/training impaired mission/training
effectiveness. effectiveness.
Area 26.8 All objectives covered with Minor errors did not Did not cover all objectives
Time Management no time wasted. detract from or manage time wisely.
mission/training
effectiveness.
Area 26.9 Provided proper instruction and Minor errors did not Improper CAS instruction
Live Fly or Dry CAS feedback throughout the live-fly detract from and incorrect feedback
Control Instruction CAS mission. mission/training precluded mission
effectiveness. effectiveness.
Area 26.10 Assigned proper grade and Minor errors did not Failed to assign proper
Administered Student completed training detract grade when appropriate.
Grade and documentation correctly. from mission/training Unable to complete training
Documentation effectiveness. documentation correctly.
Area 26.11 Employed all available Any dangerous act.
Safety methods to ensure safety of flight Disregarded safety
(CRITICAL) and ground personnel. Used procedures. Did not use
equipment, to include equipment in a safe manner.
signaling devices, laser Did not comply with safety
target designators and IR requirements.
marking devices, in a safe
manner.

14
o JTAC-E GRADING CRITERIA
** Use the following grading area to conduct the recurring SOF JTAC- E Evaluations. A grade of
"U" in any area will require an overall rating of Unqualified.

TABLE A-1: SOF JTAC EVALUATOR EVALUATION CRITERIA


AREA 27 Q Q- U
Area 27.1 Complies with all manuals Complied with most Failed to comply with
Compliance with pertaining to the administration of manuals. Deviations did manuals or allowed safety to
Pertinent Manuals a JTAC evaluation. not jeopardize the be jeopardized.
effectiveness of the
evaluation or safety.
Area 27.1 Thoroughly briefed the Omitted items during the Failed to adequately brief
Evaluation Briefing examinee on the conduct of the briefing causing minor the examinee.
evaluation. confusion. Did not fully
brief the examinee as to
the conduct and purpose
of the evaluation.
Area 27.3 Identified all discrepancies and Most discrepancies were Failed to identified
Identification of assigned proper area grade. identified. Failed to discrepancies related to
Discrepancies and assign Q- grade when discipline or deviations that
Assignment of Area appropriate. Assigned merited an unqualified
Grading discrepancies for grade.
performance that was Assigned Q- grades that
within standards. should have been U or
assigned U grades for
performance within
standards.

Area 27.4 Awarded the appropriate overall Awarded an overall Did not award a grade
Assessment of Overall grade based on the examinee's grade without commensurate with overall
Performance performance. consideration of performance.
cumulative deviations in
the examinee's
performance.
Area 27.5 Assigned proper additional Additional training Failed to assign additional
Appropriate training if warranted. assigned was insufficient training when warranted.
Assignment of to ensure the examinee
Additional Training would achieve proper
level of qualification.
Area 27.6 Assigned proper additional Additional training Failed to assign additional
Mission Debrief training if warranted. assigned was insufficient training when warranted.
to ensure the examinee
would achieve proper
level of qualification.
Area 27.7 Thoroughly debriefed the Debriefed supervisor, Failed to debrief the
Briefing the examinee on all aspects of the but failed to discuss all examinee's supervisor on an
Supervisor on the evaluation. discrepancies, grades, or unsatisfactory evaluation.
Evaluation additional training.
Area 27.8 Correctly completed all Completed Failed to properly document
Completed Evaluation documentation required in documentation with evaluation in accordance
Documentation accordance with manuals. minor errors. with manuals.

15
E. POST MISSION DEBRIEF
¨ Prior to debriefing, cross-check w/ your Truth Data Agent to ensure you have all grading
information for overall grade and sub-area grading.
¨ Identify all discrepancies and the factors surrounding them (Areas and downgrade).
o Make all appropriate decisions before debriefing Evaluee. Once you have made a decision do
not waffle on that decision. JTAC’s will leverage their relationship and any waffling as an
opportunity to exploit you into making a potentially catastrophic event down range.
o Understand the full spectrum of JTAC, and decide can the JTAC safely control aircraft or does
he become unsafe, utilize TTPs that are questionable which impose more risk to fratricide
and
¨ Debrief Evaluee and recap everything that occurred during the evaluation. Where, when etc.
¨ Inform Evaluee of the overall grade you are awarding (GO/ NO-GO).
¨ Identify strong points you witnessed to the supervisor and your overall assessment of the
evaluation.
¨ Identify any additional training you are recommending (they have no more than 90 calendar days
to accomplish any assigned training).
¨ Explain the process of documentation and routing of USSOCOM IMT 43, (20172803, V1)
¨ Answer all of the Evaluees and supervisors questions.
Brief CDR on outcome of evaluation; Certified, Additional training, Decertified, etc.
¨ Re-tests are conducted at the discretion of the JTAC-E (Ground Phase min is 24-hrs, no reqt. For
Control Phase)

16
F. EVALUATOR CHEAT CARD FOR GRADING JTAC EVALUATIONS

G. EVALUATOR CHEAT CARD FOR GRADING JTAC I/E EVALUATIONS

17
H. JTAC-E Debrief References
Subject JFIRE 2019 JP 3-09.2 2018
General Planning for JFS Page 1 Page III-1-120, IV-1-18
Collateral Damage Page 5 Page III-35
SFC-SFC based Fire Support Page 7-33 Pg III-58-67 (FSCM)
Pg III-61-74,80-86(FW), 86-90 (RW), 94-97
AIR-SFC Page 35-66 (Bomber), 97-100(UAS), 100-104/V54(130)
CAS Page 38-64 Page III-38
CAS Execution Template Table 31 Page 38 Page V-13-49
TAC Roles and Responsibilities (TOC/MOA) Table 32 Page 40 Page III-41-48
Routing and Safety of Flight Table 33 Page 41 Page V-14-16
CAS Check-in Briefing Table 34 Page 43 Page V-16-18
CAS Situation Updates Table 35-36 Page 44-46 Page V18-21
Gameplan and 9line CAS Brief and Tgt Correlation Table 37 Page 48 Page V21-32, V33-44(Correlation)
BDA Report Table 38 Page 49 Pabe V-49
An example of JTAC to JFO Coordination Table 39-41 Page 51-52 Page V-66-73
RW CAS 5line Table 42 Page 54 Page III-91-93
Army Aviation Air to ground Check in Brief Table 43 Page 55
Army Aviation Attack Request and SOF Gunship CFF Table 44 Page 56
Threat Mitigation (Avoid-Suppress-Kill) Page 65
A/C and SFC Fires Integration Techniques Page 66 Pg III-61-74
Coordnated Attack Page 68 Page III-78-80
Electronic Attack Page 69-74
Cyberspace Effects Page 75
FACA/TACA Page III-108-114, V-49,60-66
FW Capabilities and Communication Equipment Table 55 Page 79-81
RW Capabilities and Communication Equipment Table 56 Page 82
UAS Capailities and Communication Equipment Table 57 Page 83
Aircraft Sensor Capabilities Table 58 Page 84-86 Page V-51-53 (Sensor Postures)
BREVITY Appendix B Page 87-102
Brevity Terms Tabe 60-67 Page 88-113
LASER Operations Appendix C Page 103-106 Page III-48-58
A/C Delivered Munitions Description Appendix D Page 107-116
Recommended Target-Weapon Pairing Table 68 Page 114
DACAS Operations / VDL Appendix E Page 117-126 Page III-104-108, D-1-19
Threat Capabilities Table 83-88 Page 131-134
MEDIVAC, LZ, and Airdrop Operations Appendix F Page 135-140
Medivac Request Table 90 Page 136
Risk Estimated Distances Appendix H Page 141-151
FW REDs Table 99 Page 145-148
RW REDs Table 100 Page 149-151
Minimum Safe Distances Appendix I Page 151-156
MSDs Table 101 Page 152

18
19
20
I. ARTILLERY AND MORTARS

21
22
Determine Intercept Point

Determine Trigger Point

23
Six Elements of the CFF
1. Observer Id
2. Warning Order
a. Type of Mission
i. Adjust fire
ii. Fire for Effect
iii. Suppress
iv. Immediate Suppression and Immediate Smoke
b. Size of Element to FFE
c. Method of Target Location
i. Grid
ii. Laser Grid
iii. Polar Plot
iv. Laser Polar
v. Shift from a Known Point
3. Target Location
a. Grid
b. Laser Grid
c. Polar Plot
d. Laser Polar
e. Shift(Range nearest 100m)(Vertical shift nearest 5m)
4. Target Description
a. What it is

24
b. What the target is doing
c. Number of elements in the target
d. Degree of protection
e. Target Size and Shape
5. Method of Engagement
a. Type of Adjustment(Area Fire/Precision Fire)
b. Danger Close(600m MTR/ARTY, 750m 5’NGF)
c. Mark
d. Trajectory(Low/High Angle)
e. Ammunition
i. Followed By
ii. Projectile
iii. Fuze
iv. Volume of fire
f. Distribution(Converged/Open/Special Sheafs)
6. Method of Fire and Control
a. Method of fire
b. Method of Control
i. Fire When Ready
ii. At My Command
iii. By Round At My Command
iv. Cannot Observe
v. TOT
vi. TTT
vii. Continuous Illumination
viii. Coordinated Illumination
ix. Cease Loading
x. Check Firing
xi. Continuous Fire
xii. Repeat
xiii. Request Splash
xiv. Do Not Load
xv. Duration

Message To Observer
1. Units to Fire
2. Changes to the CFF
3. Number of Rounds
4. Target Number
5. Additional Information
a. Probable Error in Range
b. Angle T(500mils or greater)
c. PRF Code
d. Time of Flight

25
15 Subsequent Corrections
1. OT Dir
2. Danger close/ cancel danger close
3. Trajectory
4. Method of Fire
5. Distribution(Converged, Open, Linear, Special Sheaf)
6. Projectile
7. Fuze
8. Volume
9. Deviation Correction
10. Ranger Correction
11. HOB Correction
12. Target Description
13. Mission Type/ Method of Control
14. Splash
15. Repeat
HOB Spottings/HOB Correction(Nearest 5m)
1. Air (Correct to 20m HOB and FFE)
2. Graze (Without previous airburst-Up40, With previous airburst-Up20)
3. Mixed
4. Mixed Air
5. Mixed Graze
Range Spottings/Range Correction(Add/Drop)
1. Over
2. Short
3. Target
4. Range Correct
5. Doubtful-Over, Short, Target, Range Correct
6. Lost
7. Unobserved
8. Unobserved Over or Short
Deviation Spotting(Nearest 1mil)/ Deviation Correction(Nearest 10meters)
1. Line
2. Left
3. Right
Adjustment Techniques
1. Successive Bracketing
2. Hasty Bracketing
3. One-round Adjustment
4. Creeping Fire

26
Illumination
(Pg. 6-7, FM 6-30)
The Illumination shell is used to:
• Illuminate areas of suspected enemy activity.
• Provide illumination for night adjustment.
• Harass enemy positions.
• Furnish direction to friendly troops for attacks or patrol activities.
• Mark targets (by air and ground burst) for attack by close air support.
• “Wash Out” Enemy passive night-sight systems when used at ground level.

The Different Illuminating Patterns are as follows:


• One gun Illumination.
• Two-gun Illumination.
• Two-gun Illumination Range Spread.
• Two-gun Illumination Lateral Spread.
• Four-gun Illumination (Range and Lateral Spread).

Adjustment of Illumination:
• Range and Deviation corrections are sent to 200m.
• HOB corrections are made in multiples of 50m.

27
Final Protective Fire
(Pg. 7-4, FM 6-30)

A Final Protective fire is an immediately available preplanned barrier of direct and indirect fire
designed to provide close protection to friendly positions and installations by impeding enemy
movement into defensive areas.

Normally, the FPF is within 200m to 400m (from the friendly position) and is integrated into the
final protective line of the maneuver unit.

The CFF is similar to the normal CFF (with some exceptions):


• When you adjust, the target location is a grid a safe distance 400 to 600m from friendly
troops. Only because the actual FPF is part of a final defensive plan, it should be sent by
secure coms.
• “Final Protective Fire” is announced, instead of Target Description.
• Attitude and Danger Close are announced in the method of engagement.

Adjustment procedures:
• The FO begins adjustment with the flank piece impacting closest to the FPF line.
• You must use creeping fire in a danger close situation.
• Corrections of 50 m or less are not fired.
• Ounce you adjust the first gun you send “Number 2, repeat” and adjust each gun in
succession.
• To minimize the safety hazard to friendly units in adjustment you should use Fuze
Delay.
• If you do not have enough time to shoot the FPF you will send the grid to both ends of
the desired FPF area or the center grid and attitude.

28
Registration
Artillery:
The Purpose of Impact Registration is to get spottings of four rounds (2 over and 2 short) along the OT
line from rounds fired with the same data or from rounds fired with data 25m apart (50m apart when PER
is greater than or equal to 25m).

1. Spot rounds to nearest 1 mil and bring the rounds onto the OT line before you split the 200m bracket.
(No Deviation Corrections should be made after 200m bracket is broken.) - If
doubtful range spotting only give Deviation Correction. - If you break
the 200m bracket and give a deviation correction, the last round fired and all previous rounds cannot be
used for determining range and deviation refinement data.

2. 50m range bracket is established, 2 rounds are fired with data 25m in the opposite direction of the last
range spotting. If both rounds are short or over an add or drop of 25m with a change in volume to 1 round
is sent. Firing is continued until another definite range spotting is at the opposite end of the 25m range
bracket.

3. Give refinement data to the nearest 10m.

4. Range Refinement:
A) If the registration point is nearer the last round fire, No Range Refinement.
B) If the registration point is equidistant between the two sets of rounds (Add or Drop 10).
C) If the registration is nearer the pair of rounds at the opposite end of the bracket (Add or Drop
20).
D) Keep track of rounds by using DA form 5429-R.

5. Deviation Refinement:
A) Add the rounds that establish the 2 overs and 2 shorts. Then Divide by the number of rounds.
Then express to the nearest mil. The average deviation multiplied by the OT Factor equals the
refinement correction (Nearest 10m).
B) Example: Round. Spottings
1 +6R
2 –8R
3 –5R
4 +7R

Sum of Deviation is 6R+8R+5R+7R= 26R


Average Deviation is 26R / 4rds = 6.5R ~ 6R
OT Factor = 3
3 X 6R= 18mR ~ 20mR
(Left 20, Drop 10, RARP, EOM, Over)

Mortar:
Same as Impact Registration for Artillery.
- Except that once a 100m range bracket has been split and the last fired round is within
50m of the target refinement is sent to FDC and EOM.
- 25m Corrections for Range.

Adjusting the Sheaf for Mortars:

29
A) “Prepare to Adjust Sheaf, Over.”
“Section Right (or Left) Repeat, Over.”
B) You want 40 meters Lateral spread within 50 meters range.
C) When your done with adjusting the Sheaf:
“Refinement, Gun ____ is Adjusted, Sheaf Adjusted, EOM, Over.”

Time Registration:
1) The purpose of Time Registration is to correct the mean HOB of four rounds fired with the same data
to 20m above the Registration Point.

A) If the 1st round is a graze burst, “Up 40”.


B) Once the measurable airburst is obtained, “3 rounds Repeat, Over”.
C) When 4 rounds have been fired with the same data the registration is ended
with refinement corrections to achieve 20m HOB.

2) Sum of HOB Spottings = Air5 +Air6 + Air3 + Air5 = Air 19


Average HOB is Air19 / 4 = Air 4.75 ~ Air5
OT Factor = 3
3 X Air5 = Air14
“Up5, RATRP, EOM, Over.”

3) Summary of Airburst and Fuse Corrections:


All Graze = Up 40
Three Graze, One Air = Up 20
Two Graze, Two Air = Up10
One Graze, Three Air = No Correction

30
SMOKE
Smoke is used for:
• Obscuring- Use and effects of a smoke screen placed directly on or near the enemy with
the primary purpose of suppressing observers and minimizing their vision.
• Screening- A smoke curtain used on the battle field between enemy observation points and
friendly units to mask maneuvers.
• Deception- A smoke curtain used to deceive and confuse the enemy as to the nature of
friendly operations.
• Signaling- Smoke used to establish a reference for friendly forces.

Employment Considerations:
• Optimum wind speed is 4 to 14 kts.
• Wind speed for smoke is 4 to 10 kts.
• Wind speed for WP is 9 to 14 kts.
• Wind direction influences the desired location of smoke in the target area.
• Maneuver Target Line.
• Temperature- A rise in temperature may increase the rate of evaporation.
• Humidity and Precipitation may enhance the effectiveness of smoke.
• Terrain, the following rules apply:
- If smoke is placed on tanks in defilade, they lose their sense of direction
- Smoke seeks low spots.
- Firing smoke on dry vegetation may start fires.
- Smoke should not be fired on deep mud, water, or snow. The smoke canisters
normally will not function properly.
- Smoke should not be fired on steep slopes. The canisters roll downhill.
§ Enemy, some rules are as follows:
- Fire smoke on enemy artillery Ops and gunners to greatly r educe their
effectiveness.
- Fire smoke and HE on the enemy when he deploys from column to line
formation. The HE will keep him buttoned up. The smoke will cause maximum
confusion.
- Fire smoke and HE on minefields to cause maximum confusion.
- Understand the effects of smoke on friendly positions. Smoke used without enough thought and

planning reduces the user’s effectiveness more than that of the enemy.

Immediate Smoke
The objective of immediate smoke is to obscure the enemy’s vision.

Employment Considerations:
1. HE is better for suppression than Immediate Smoke. But smoke will provide suppression
for a longer period of time than HE.
2. A suggested mix is firing WP (for initial quick buildup) and firing smoke (for duration).
Once the smoke has built up, all subsequent volleys should be shell smoke.
3. The HOB of shell Smoke can be adjusted as follows:
- Ground Burst: up100
- Canisters bouncing excessively: up50
- Canisters too spread out: down 50

31
4. 30 seconds after the shell impact and that it will last about 4 to 5 minutes. If the smoke is
required for a longer period, additional volleys of smoke should be requested. (When a
mixture of smoke and WP are fired.)
5. The point that you want the smoke to impact should be about 100m short on the maneuver-
target line and 100m upwind of the enemy location.

Immediate Smoke CFF: U de Me, Immediate Smoke, Grid AB123456, OVER.

Quick Smoke
The objective of quick smoke is to obscure the enemy’s vision or to screen maneuver elements.
(You begin the mission by adjusting with HE, changing to smoke when within 200m of the adjusting
point, and then firing for effect with smoke.)

Employment Considerations:
1. Quick Smoke is used to obscure an area up to 600m wide. (If the tgt. Area is larger than
600m do multiple quick smoke missions.) The smoke may be effective up to 1,500m
DOWNWIND.
2. Observer first determines the nature of the target and the location of the adjusting point.
Then determine the size of the target area and the wind direction in relation to the
maneuver-target line.
3. You find the adjusting point by determining the wind direction and whether WP or smoke
is to be fired in FFE.
4. FDC must be informed of the target length, attitude, wind direction, and the length of time
the smoke is required.
5. For a “At My Command Quick Smoke Mission”, you add the time of flight to the average
buildup time of 30 seconds for WP and 60 seconds for smoke.

Adjustment:
1. Shell Smoke- HE will be used in adjustment until a 200m bracket is split. Then you will
request shell smoke.
2. Shell White Phosphorus- done just like AF mission with WP I/E.
3. Improved Smoke- This is the predominant 155-mm smoke round. (FM 6-30, pg.6-21)

Quick Smoke CFF:


1) U de Me, Adjust Fire, OVER.
2) Grid 123456, OVER.
3) Tree Line, 200m, 1,800m , Crosswind, Duration 6 minutes, Smoke I/E, OVER.

Quick Smoke with multiple aiming points:


Observer observes the effects and sends “ Second Aiming Point, Right 500, Drop 200,
REPEAT, OVER.”

32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
J. OCT 2019 JFIRE REFERENCES

74 ATP 3-09.32/MCRP 3-31.6/NTTP 3-09.2/AFTTP 3-2.6 18 OCT 2019

44
18 OCT 2019 ATP 3-09.32/MCRP 3-31.6/NTTP 3-09.2/AFTTP 3-2.6 131

45
46
142 ATP 3-09.32/MCRP 3-31.6/NTTP 3-09.2/AFTTP 3-2.6 18 OCT 2019

18 OCT 2019 ATP 3-09.32/MCRP 3-31.6/NTTP 3-09.2/AFTTP 3-2.6 143

47
144 ATP 3-09.32/MCRP 3-31.6/NTTP 3-09.2/AFTTP 3-2.6 18 OCT 2019

18 OCT 2019 ATP 3-09.32/MCRP 3-31.6/NTTP 3-09.2/AFTTP 3-2.6 145

48
49
146 ATP 3-09.32/MCRP 3-31.6/NTTP 3-09.2/AFTTP 3-2.6 18 OCT 2019

50
18 OCT 2019 ATP 3-09.32/MCRP 3-31.6/NTTP 3-09.2/AFTTP 3-2.6 147-148

51
18 OCT 2019 ATP 3-09.32/MCRP 3-31.6/NTTP 3-09.2/AFTTP 3-2.6 149

52
53
18 OCT 2019 ATP 3-09.32/MCRP 3-31.6/NTTP 3-09.2/AFTTP 3-2.6 153

54
55
18 OCT 2019 ATP 3-09.32/MCRP 3-31.6/NTTP 3-09.2/AFTTP 3-2.6 154-155

56

Common questions

Powered by AI

Technology significantly enhances JTAC capabilities by improving CAS coordination and ISR integration, facilitating more efficient decision-making and task execution . Tools such as SOFLAM, NVGs, IR Pointers, and DACAS software assist in precise targeting and effective communication with aircraft . These technologies support real-time coordination, enabling JTACs to provide accurate and timely updates to the GFC and adapt swiftly to dynamic battlefield conditions . ISR technologies improve situational awareness and help track enemy movements, contributing to more effective and safer operations . The integration of digital systems ensures that JTACs can manage multiple data streams, coordinate complex missions, and maintain overall mission effectiveness .

'No Notice' evaluations require JTACs to demonstrate their ability to perform under unplanned conditions, highlighting operational readiness and adaptability . The focus is on ensuring procedural and safety compliance without prior preparation, simulating real-time demands of combat situations . Conversely, 'Recurring' evaluations provide JTACs the opportunity to plan and execute scenarios, emphasizing long-term retention of skills, integration and deconfliction of assets, and expanded situational awareness over iterative operational conditions . These evaluations test sustained competency and reinforce mission-critical skills, ensuring that JTACs adhere to evaluation standards and can adapt lessons from prior evaluations .

Situational awareness (SA) is crucial for JTACs as it affects their ability to coordinate and execute CAS missions successfully and safely . SA assessments focus on the JTAC's ability to integrate multiple data streams, maintain communication clarity, and adapt to evolving threats and mission parameters . Eval criteria place significant emphasis on SA as it underpins the ability to manage complex scenarios with multiple assets and ground forces, ensuring deconfliction and minimizing the risk of friendly fire or mission compromise due to lack of threat recognition . Evaluations test the JTAC's SA by examining their ability to use tools like the GPS and digitally aided systems for effective command and control .

Pre-planned targets hold strategic importance in JTAC missions as they guide the planned use of force and resource allocation, ensuring that missions are executed with precision and minimal collateral impact . Such planning allows for the quick engagement of high-priority targets, ensuring mission objectives are met efficiently and effectively . Pre-identifying targets also helps maintain operational tempo, allowing JTACs to swiftly manage threats as they emerge by using pre-coordinated fire support to mitigate risks to both air and ground forces . This foresight supports better coordination with the GFC and integrates seamlessly into larger operational strategies, enhancing overall mission success .

JTACs face multiple challenges in coordinating CAS missions, including ensuring procedural safety while employing fixed-wing (FW) assets, integrating and deconflicting assets effectively, and maintaining situational awareness (SA) of both air and ground elements . They must demonstrate competence in scenario planning for combat operations, which involves coordinating with ground force commanders and understanding the threats in the area . JTACs must also ensure effective communication and synchronization with aircraft, leveraging tools like the SOFLAM and GPS, all while considering collateral damage and adhering to strict rules of engagement (ROE). These tasks require deep knowledge of air-to-ground operations, understanding of ground manoeuvres, and effective use of digitally aided CAS/fires systems to track aircraft and coordinate attacks .

JTAC grading criteria are meticulously designed to ensure training adequacy and mission readiness by assessing various functional areas critical to operational success. The criteria delineate performance levels: 'Q' for satisfactory performance, 'Q-' for qualified with additional training needed, and 'U' for unqualified . Each area evaluates specific competencies, such as procedural safety, asset deconfliction, and effective communication . For instance, failing to get GFC approval before weapons release is a critical failure affecting mission safety . These evaluations systematically identify strengths and weaknesses, ensuring JTACs possess the necessary skills to perform in high-stress environments, thus maintaining a high standard of operational readiness .

JTAC evaluations emphasize communication as it ensures mission effectiveness and operational safety. Good communication practices involve timely, clear exchanges between ground forces and aircraft, and adherence to proper terminology, especially during CAS requests . Evaluations scrutinize the JTAC’s ability to handle real-time communication setbacks and to convey essential mission data without errors, ensuring aircraft and troop safety . By assessing communication, evaluators ensure that JTACs can adapt to the fluidity of mission dynamics and maintain coordination under pressure, which is vital for mitigating misunderstandings that could lead to mission failure or collateral damage .

Evaluators focus on addressing safety concerns such as airspace deconfliction, maintaining safe distances for ordnance delivery, and ensuring ROE adherence during JTAC operations . Safety issues like not securing GFC clearance for attacks, placing assets at unsafe altitudes, and misunderstanding RED, which exposes friendly forces, are examined . Evaluations involve realistic scenarios that assess the JTAC's ability to prevent these safety violations by simulating conditions such as shifting frontline of troops (FLOT), managing crossfire risks, and coordinating properly with air support to avoid incidents .

Realistic scenario planning is critical for evaluating JTAC proficiency as it allows evaluators to simulate complex and dynamic operational environments where JTACs must execute their duties . The scenarios test JTACs on various aspects such as coordinating and employing CAS assets, evaluating their proficiency in handling unexpected threats, and maintaining overall mission effectiveness even under duress . Scenario planning must incorporate realistic threat environments, tactical considerations, and must be adaptable to test the JTAC's ability to employ strategic and operational skills, such as identifying targets and mitigating collateral damage . This approach helps ensure JTACs are prepared for real-world operations by effectively integrating theoretical knowledge with practical execution .

In a semi-permissive environment, strict rules of engagement (ROE) impact operational conduct, requiring General Force Commander (GFC) approval for every strike . This environment influences SFOD-A's strategic positioning, ensuring they stay behind contact and focus on providing intelligence and ISR feedback to help the Host Nation (HN) forces break contact effectively . For JTACs, this means carefully coordinating Close Air and Fire Support while adhering to the operational ROE and managing strict control over airspace to mitigate threats from larger enemy forces like Boko Haram .

You might also like