Direct Shear Test in Soil Mechanics
Direct Shear Test in Soil Mechanics
UNIVERSITY
ANDINA
NESTOR CACERES
VELASQUEZ
PRESENTED BY:
ADCO CHARCA, GRIMALDO FLORES
ALANOCA MAMANI,HECTOR LUIS
ANAHUA HAÑARI, YORDAN
CHOQUE ZAPANA,WILFREDO
CHOQUECONDO GUZMAN,CRISTHIAN RODY
ARNAO WOOD, YENI
QUISOCALA BENAVENTE, JOEL JOVAN
RAMOS MAMANI, EDY JHERSON
SEMESTRE: VI
SECC: "A"
2018-II
INDEX
INDEX
INTRODUCTION
REGULATIONS
GENERALITIES
OBJECTIVES
GENERAL OBJECTIVE
SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES
THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
DIRECT COURT
ANGLE AT REST
PROCEDURE
CONCLUSIONS
RECOMMENDATIONS
ANNEXES
INTRODUCTION
The direct shear test aims to determine the shear strength of
shear stress of a sample, a value that, among other things, will be very useful for
the calculation of bearing capacity.
The resistance to shear stress in the soil is due to two components. The
cohesion, provided by the soil fraction and responsible for its deformation,
plastic behavior of this and the friction between granular particles
or friction.
However, their procedure has changed very little during all this time.
This procedure is governed by the "American Society of Testing".
and Materials" (ASTM).
REGULATION
This direct shear test is based on the Peruvian technical standard NTP:
339.171 and the standard (ASTM D3080)
GENERALITIES
The essay seeks to identify the relationship that is established between effort and
deformation considering an applied lateral load in such a way that it is generated
a shear effort, a horizontal failure plane parallel to the
applied load.
There are two systems for conducting the test, the controlled effort one and
the controlled deformation.
In the first one, the load that induces the effort is gradually increased until
that produces the failure.
When a structure is supported by the ground, it transmits the forces to the soil.
foundation. These efforts produce soil deformations that can occur
in three ways:
The analysis must ensure that the requested shear stresses are lower.
that the shear resistance, with an adequate margin so that the work being
safe, it is economically feasible to carry out.
OBJECTIVES
GENERAL OBJECTIVE:
SPECIFIC OBJECTIVE:
THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
Where A is the nominal area of the sample (or the cutting box) and usually
it is not corrected to take into account the change in area caused by the
lateral displacement of the sample (Ph). The relationship between the stresses of
failure cut and the normal stresses in the soils, is shown in the following
image and can be represented by the following equation:
In 1776, Columb observed that if the thrust produced by a floor against a mere
of containment produces a slight movement of the wall, in the ground that is
WHERE:
Therefore, the greater the effective effort is, the closer it will be to a failure plane.
In which the parameters c' andסּare the property of the soil skeleton,
referred to as effective cohesion and effective friction angle, respectively.
Since the shear resistance depends on the effective stresses in the
Soil stability analyses will then be conducted in terms of stresses.
effective, total efforts and therefore, in general it will be necessary to determine the
shear strength parameters of the soil in effective stresses and stresses
totals.
That is, the values of effective cohesion, effective friction angle, cohesion and
friction angle, these are often obtained from laboratory tests of
direct cut (ASTM D-3080-72).
Friction which is due to the interaction between particles and the friction between them
Cohesion (c): that which is due to internal forces that keep together the
particles in a mass.
Since the shear stress 't' and the normal stress have the same meaning
Given in the construction of the Mohr circle, instead of solving a series of
simultaneous equations
DIRECT CUT
WHERE:
Corrected area. 2
0 =: Initial area, which in this case is 900 2.
Box width, which in this case is 30 .
ℎ Horizontal displacement. 2
until the settlement stops before applying the shear force, this test
It can be placed between the consolidated undrained triaxial tests and
consolidated-drained.
ANGLE AT REST:
Two soil samples are available inside two cylinders.
different sizes uncovered on both sides and positioned vertically. The
the test consists of taking the cylinders vertically in order to
Soil sample was placed on the table like a cone.
It is done a total of two times for each cylinder, once quickly and once slowly.
Once having the different soil samples at rest, we proceed to measure
with a ruler the height from the table to the tip of the cone, and the extension
average horizontal that the base of the cone reaches for each case.
The formula to obtain the angle refers to the Figure. The parameter b is the
average of widths that are measured.
Balance RING
STOPWATCH TARA
1 Piston
2 Securing screws
3 Lower part
4 Grooved base
5 Porous metal
6 Upper part
7 Filter paper
PROCEDURE
2
The main thing is to select an unaltered sample and through the
molding method.
First, the sample is carefully molded, taken from a
large size.
Using a hammer, blows are struck on the mold with the aim of making the
molded sample.
After this, a knife was used to carve the sample to size.
of the bronze ring.
Once the sample is ready, or the ring is completely filled
And in turn, we extract it from the material and proceed to weigh it.
the sample.
Filter paper (NEWSPAPER) is placed on both sides of the sample to
find the moisture content of the sample
Next, we saturate the sample; for this saturation process
varies according to the type of material to be tested.
Then we place the sample in the direct shear equipment.
the wet porous stone is placed, then the sample and finally the
second porous stone, then we adjust the equipment and take to the
direct cutting device.
ℎ
ℎ=
where:
%= x 100
Where
Water weight
ℎ
=
%
1 + 100
Where
specimen data
esp 01 esp 02 esp 03
initial final initial final initial final
height (h) 2cm 2cm 2cm 2cm 2cm 2cm
area 100 cm2 1oocm2 100cm2 100cm2 100 cm2 100 cm2
dry density
(yd) 1.2971 1.2586 1.5327
humidity(w) % 45.05 45.05 35.92 35.92 24.91 24.91
normal effort 1kg 2 kg 3kg
SPECIMEN 1 SPECIMEN 2
SPECIMEN3
DEFORMATION effort
TANGENTIAL (mm)loading dial shear force of cut
0 0 0 0
0.1 10.6 10.5998553 0.106
0.2 11.8 11.7998389 0.118
0.3 14.2 14.1998062 0.142
0.4 17.5 17.4997611 0.175
0.6 21.9 21.8997011 0.219
0.8 22.8 22.7996888 0.228
1 25 24.9996588 0.25
1.25 28.8 28.7996069 0.288
1.5 30 29.9995905 0.3
1.75 31.2 31.1995741 0.312
2 33.6 33.5995414 0.336
2.25 37.5 37.4994881 0.375
2.5 41.8 41.7994294 0.418
2.75 42.8 42.7994158 0.428
3 45.1 45.0993844 0.451
3.5 46.8 46.7993612 0.468
4 47 46.9993585 0.47
4.5 46.2 46.1993694 0.462
5 45 44.9993858 0.45
5.5 43.2 43.1994103 0.432
GRAPHIC:
0.5
0.45
0.4
0.35
0.3
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
INTERPRETATION
We observe the shear stress vs. normal stress graph, I don’t know
completed due to the fact that only one trial was conducted.
CONCLUSIONS
It was reached the proposed goal of finding the soil parameters by the
direct cut method due to more reliable results, for which they are
results that can be adapted to the type of soil to be managed.
This lab essay is very interesting, since through
we can know the moisture content for which the soil
reaches its maximum dry density, it is very simple it does not need much
time
RECOMMENDATIONS
Keep the samples in a humid environment while preparing.
from the direct cutting machine.
The direct cutting machine must be operated at a constant speed.
the entire time the rehearsal lasts.
It is necessary for the material to be used to have a density and a grading.
uniform to avoid segregation during handling and use.
At the time of the laboratory test, it is recommended to avoid any
type of vibration in the area, as this can cause an excess of
show in each layer.
Take into account the proper use of the practice and be careful with the
materials and equipment.
ANNEXES