Mesoamerican Research Project Guidelines
Mesoamerican Research Project Guidelines
Author
Mtro. José Samuel Martínez López
samjusto@[Link]
Web
[Link]
Mexico City
AUGUST of 2003
2
3) State of the art (what has been done/said about this research object?)
4) The thematic areas from which general information will be obtained about the
specific object of study
0) General description of the project: after the index, this is the first part of the
project. Here it is about making an 'executive summary' and introductory of
the entire project in a maximum of a couple of pages. Therefore, it must be pointed out
clearly the specific object of study, the thematic areas, the problem
practico, la justificación, las preguntas, los objetivos, la metodología, las técnicas, los
desired outcomes and the expected impact.
2) Specific object of study: here it is not written what is going to be done during the
investigation, it only indicates what is going to be studied and researched, that is, after
to have delimited the "object of study" temporally and spatially to the maximum, in this
The point indicates the 'fragment of reality' that one is going to investigate.
3) State of the art: here it is described in a very general way what has been said or
investigated about the object of study.
4) Thematic areas (or areas of interest in which the project is framed) of the
which information can be obtained about the object of study: here it is indicated
what are the 'fields or areas of human knowledge', or rather, the
scientific or humanities disciplines from which it is expected to obtain information
about the specific "object of study."
5) Topic or theme to which the research belongs: Here the general topic is indicated.
to which our small specific investigation belongs.
6) Practical problem: this is perhaps the element that gives rise to the development of everything
research project. The problem is the formalization of a need in which
unresolved difficulties arise. Defining a problem is clearly stating
specify the various elements of it, so that they are well organized
specified as well as their mutual relationships. Therefore, to locate it, one must
describe it contextually, that is, in relation to the environment in which it appears
in order to gain a broader perspective for its possible solution. This requires
to locate it precisely in spatial-temporal terms and to point out the various aspects
that have affected its emergence. Defining the problem makes it possible for others
understand what is intended to be resolved with the research.
b) cost of the practical problem: here the costs are argued and described
social consequences generated by the problem.
7) Research Problem: while the practical problem is the description "of the
specific situation" that motivates the entire inquiry, the "research problem" is the
reading or interpretation of the same practical problem but in terms of information.
This is, the research problem is the description of that which we do not know, it is
the location of the information we lack and that if we had it could
help to solve the problem.
8) Justification: here it is indicated and explained with arguments (coherent, logical and
convincing), why it is important that this research is carried out and not another.
Hello, the following two questions must be answered:
9) Research questions: here are the questions that one will seek.
respond with all the research. In all research, there are two types of
questions:
a) Central or Key Questions: here are noted the two or three major ones
questions that arise from the research problem, it is about
of the central questions that drive us to carry out all the inquiry.
11) Interpretive theoretical framework: it is the theory from which the researching subject
it will interpret its object of study. The functions of any theoretical framework are: to delimit the
research area, suggest research guidelines, gather existing knowledge
in the area to be researched, express general theoretical propositions....For
to build the theoretical framework, it is necessary to review the existing literature, ensure that
"intellectual authority" of the selected author or authors, review the validity of the
information consulted, review the period of production of the theory, review the clarity
and coherence of the postulated principles and assumptions on which the
theory, review the solidity of the theories.
a) Name of the theory(ies): here the name of the theory that is going to be described
use to interpret/explain/understand the object of study.
d) Explanation of the theory: here it is described from the general to the specific
chosen theory. To do this, it is necessary to explain (and support with textual quotes) the
main statements and the main concepts that make up this
theory.
13) Basic hypotheses or conjectures: hypotheses are the link between theory and
investigation. A hypothesis proposes a "possible answer" to the problem of
investigation, while suggesting an explanation for certain facts and guiding the
investigation of others. The hypotheses or conjectures are in this sense the
tentative answers to the central or core questions that guide the whole
research. It is important not to forget that the hypotheses must establish the
"variables" to be studied, set limits, establish relationships between variables, serve as
based on inferences that help us explain the object of study, they propose a
tentative solution to the researched problem, helps to maintain consistency with the
facts. There are different types of hypothesis. By their 'formulation' they can be: a) general
the empirical, working or operational, null and b) of research, operational,
statistics. By their "object", they can be descriptive or causal. By their "extent",
they can be singular, restricted general statistics, universal not
restricted. They can also be generic, particular, empirical, plausible, before-
facto, post-facto, validated. The qualities of a good hypothesis are:
generality (must transcend the conjectural explanation of the singular) and specificity
(they must allow the breakdown of operations and predictions). It must be
well-defined its variables, its terms must be precise. For your reference
empirical findings must be able to be verified and refuted, that is, they must be able to be subjected to
test. To evaluate them, it is necessary to know if there is conceptual precision in their variables, if
there is operational precision, knowing if they respond to the problem, if they allow predictions, if
they guide the research, if they propose logical relationships between variables). The
The construction of hypotheses is optional depending on the type of research.
It is not recommended to prepare for exploratory research regularly.
hypothesis.
14) Type of research: here the type of research that one is going to conduct is indicated.
carry out according to 'the nature of the object of study' (documentary or field)
depending on the objectives of the research (basic/pure/academic or applied),
depending on the temporality of the object of study (sectional or transectional), depending on what it is
the methodological strategy (quantitative, qualitative, and triangulation), and depending on
level of depth of the knowledge sought with the research (exploratory,
descriptive, correlational, and explanatory) :
9
a) Due to the nature of my subject of study, this research is....
b) For its objectives, my research is.....
c) Due to the temporality of my object of study, this research is...
d) The methodological strategy to be used in this research is....
e) Due to the depth and type of knowledge that is sought to be obtained, this
research is....
b) Why was that strategy chosen and not another?: here through arguments and
explanations are justified (especially epistemologically) why it
he/she decided to use this strategy and not another.
c) How will the entire research be carried out? And in what order?
here are listed (from start to finish) the phases and steps to be taken throughout the
research.
16) Information gathering techniques: here it is pointed out which techniques are
collection that is intended to be used, it explains why those techniques were chosen and
says how they are going to be applied.
17) Information analysis techniques: here the techniques are pointed out which
analysis is planned to be applied, it explains why those were chosen and it states how it is that they
they are going to apply.
19) Expected impact: here it is humbly pointed out what is the way
"concrete" (and feasible) will surely happen as a result of the research
21) Schedule: here, using a word table, you need to describe the sequence
of the activities of the entire research periodized one by one by date:
10
SCHEDULE OF ACTIVITIES
Activity September October Nov Dic January Feb
Preparation of X
Investment Project.
Search for X
References
Documentaries
Reading of X
documents
Application of X
surveys
Organization and X
analysis of the
results
Drafting of X
First Draft
from the Report
Draft of the X
second draft
of the Report
Presentation of the
report
X
There are several ways to compile reference lists depending on the system.
or the "style" used to do it. The systems and styles worldwide
The most recognized for drafting reference lists are: The system of the
11
American Psychological Association (APA), the system proposed by Kate L.
Turabian (TURABIAN system), the system of the Modern Language
Association (MLA), the style proposed by The Chicago Manual of Style
(Chicago system), and the Harvard system.
The order of the data that must include all the references made under this
system, is the following: