Scribd
Upload
6 views3 pages

Understanding Discussion Texts: Structure & Purpose

A Discussion Text presents multiple viewpoints on a controversial issue, aiming to provide a balanced understanding for readers. It typically includes an introduction of the issue, arguments for and against it, and a conclusion or recommendation. Key language features include general and abstract nouns, present tense, connectives, modal verbs, and causal conjunctions.

Uploaded by

junudullah11
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
6 views3 pages

Understanding Discussion Texts: Structure & Purpose

A Discussion Text presents multiple viewpoints on a controversial issue, aiming to provide a balanced understanding for readers. It typically includes an introduction of the issue, arguments for and against it, and a conclusion or recommendation. Key language features include general and abstract nouns, present tense, connectives, modal verbs, and causal conjunctions.

Uploaded by

junudullah11
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

DISCUSSION TEXT

1. Definition

A Discussion Text is a type of text that presents two or more different viewpoints about a
controversial issue. It aims to give readers a balanced understanding before they make a
conclusion.

2. Social Function

- Present arguments for and against an issue.

- Help readers understand different perspectives.

- Provide balanced information.

- Guide readers to form their own informed opinion.

3. Generic Structure

a. Issue

Introduces the topic being discussed and gives background information.

b. Arguments For (Pros)

Explains the positive sides or supporting arguments of the issue.

c. Arguments Against (Cons)

Explains the negative sides or opposing arguments of the issue.

d. Conclusion / Recommendation

Summarizes both arguments and may give a recommendation or the writer’s final view.
4. Language Features

- General nouns: technology, students, pollution

- Abstract nouns: responsibility, development, education

- Present tense: is, are, happens

- Connectives:

* For pros: firstly, moreover, supporters believe

* For cons: however, on the other hand, opponents argue

- Modal verbs: should, can, may, might

- Relating verbs: is, are, have

- Causal conjunctions: because, therefore, consequently

Sample of Discussion Text

Title: Should Students Use Mobile Phones at School?

Issue

The use of mobile phones in schools has become a widely debated topic. Some people think
that mobile phones should be allowed, while others believe they should be banned because
they bring more harm than good.

Arguments For

Supporters argue that mobile phones can be useful learning tools. Students can look up
information quickly, use educational apps, and communicate with teachers through online
platforms. Moreover, phones can be important during emergencies, allowing students to
contact their families immediately.

Arguments Against

However, many people believe that mobile phones cause more distraction than benefits.
Students often use them to play games, check social media, or watch videos during class.
Opponents also argue that phones can encourage cheating during exams and contribute to
cyberbullying among students.

Conclusion

In conclusion, both sides have strong arguments. Mobile phones can support learning, but
they can also distract students from their studies. Schools should consider allowing phones
only for educational purposes and limiting their use during class time.

You might also like