API 570: Piping Systems Inspection Guide
API 570: Piping Systems Inspection Guide
R4
API 570
PIPES IN SERVICE.
INDEX
Introduction
Sección 1 Alcance:.................................................................................................................................. 4
1.1 General Application
Service Fluid Category D.......................................................................................... 6
Section 2 references
Terms used:................................................................................................................................ 8
Section 4 Owner's Inspection Organization: ........................................................................ 15
Section 5 Inspection practices, modes of failure and evaluation: ......................................................... 18
Preparation of the works:................................................................................................................ 19
5.3 Inspection of specific types of corrosion and cracking........................................................... 20
5.4 Types of Inspection and Surveillance
5.5 Locations for Thickness Measurement (TML)................................................................ 31
5.6 Thickness measurement methods.................................................................................. 34
5.7 Pressure Test.................................................................................................................... 35
5.8 Material traceability.
5.9 Valve Inspection
5.10 Inspection of welds in service................................................................................... 38
5.11 Inspection of flanged joints.
Section 6 Frequency and Scope of Inspection. ................................................................................. 41
6. 2 Types of Pipe Service.................................................................................................... 42
6.3 Inspection intervals.............................................................................................................. 43
6.4 Extension of External Visual Inspection and CUI
6.5 Inspection scope
6.6 Scope of inspection for auxiliary pipes, small diameter and threaded joints............ 46
Section 7 Registration, Analysis, and Evaluation of Inspection Data....................................................... 50
7.1.1 Remaining Life Calculation........................................................................................... 50
7.1.2 New Systems or with Changes in the Service........................................................................ 51
7.1.3 Existing Systems
7.2 MAWP. ....................................................................................................................................... 52
7.3 Determination of withdrawal thickness
7.4 Evaluation of inspection findings.
7.5 Stress Analysis of piping systems
7.6 Records...................................................................................................................................... 56
Section 8 Repairs, Alterations, and Rerating:............................................................................. 58
8.1 Repairs and Alterations.
8.1.3 Welding Repairs
8.1.4 Unwelded Repairs......................................................................................................... 60
8.2 Welding and hot tapping............................................................................................................... 60
8.2.1 and 2 Preheating and PWHT................................................................................................. 61
8.2.3 Design....................................................................................................................................... 62
8.2.4 Materials................................................................................................................................. 63
8.2.5 END.......................................................................................................................................... 63
8.2.6 Pressure Test. ................................................................................................................... 64
8.3 Re-rating
Section 9 Inspection of buried pipes........................................................................................ 68
Introduction
API-570 "Code for Inspection of In-Service Piping Systems": covers
Inspection, Rating, Repair, and Alteration Procedures for Piping Systems
metallics that have been put into service.
Like other Codes, each new edition or addendum becomes mandatory six
months after its publication.
GENERAL
This Code contains the following sections:
Scope
References
Scope
Definitions
Owner's inspection organization.
Inspection practices.
Frequencies and scope of inspection.
Recording, analysis, and evaluation of inspection data.
Repairs, Alterations and Re-rating.
Inspection of buried pipes.
Appendices.
Section 1 Scope:
• Included services
Except for specific exceptions of the Code, it applies to piping systems for fluids.
of process, hydrocarbons, and service fluids similarly flammable or toxic,
such as the following:
Catalytic lines;
Drainage water and water with contaminant levels above the limits
allowed by the jurisdictional requirements;
a) Fluids
Hazardous products with contaminant limits below what
allowed by jurisdictional requirements;
Water, including fire suppression systems, steam, condensate, water from
cooling of boilers and systems classified as category D in
ASME B31.3.
9The fluid handled is not flammable, not toxic, and does not harm human tissues;
9La presión de diseño manométrica no excede 150 psi; y
9The design temperature is between -20.0F (-290C) and 3660F (1860C).
Section 2 references
Includes references to other standards, codes, and specifications. The following are
examples of them.
API 510 Pressure Vessel Inspection Code.
API RP-574 Pipe Inspection
API RP-578 Material Verification Program for new systems and
existing.
API RP 579 Fitness for Service
API RP 651 Cathodic protection for aboveground petroleum storage tanks
level.
API Publ 2201 Hot taps of equipment in service
API 750 Hazard Management Systems.
Std 598 Inspection and testing of valves.
Inspection guides for refinery equipment (chapter II): Replaced by API 571
ASME B31.3
ASME BPVC Section VIII Division 1 and 2. Section IX.
ASME B16.34 Valves with threaded ends for flanging and welding.
ASME B31.G Manual for determining the strength of corroded pipes.
NACE RP 0169 Control of corrosion of buried and submerged pipes.
NACE MR 0170 Protection of austenitic stainless steels against cracking by
corrosion under tension (Plolythionic acid) during shutdown and startup of equipment
of the refinery.
NACE RP 0274 High Voltage Inspection of Pipe Coatings.
NACE MR 0275 Application of organic coatings to buried pipelines.
ASNT Requirements for qualification and certification of NDT personnel.
ASTM G 57. Method for field measurement of soil resistivity.
Terms used:
Authorized Inspection Agency
Any of the following organizations may employ an authorized inspector.
Jurisdiction.
Insurance companies authorized or licensed to issue pipeline policies.
The organization of the operator that maintains an inspection organization only for
its facilities.
An independent organization or individual under contract with the operator.
Building Code
The Code or Standard with which the piping was originally constructed (e.g. ASME, B31.3)
Inspection Code
Short name to refer to API 570
Defect
Imperfection of magnitude or type that exceeds the limits of acceptance.
END
Non-Destructive Testing/Examination.
In Service
Refers to pipeline systems that have been put into operation.
Examiner
A person who assists the Inspector in carrying out NDE on system components.
pipeline, but does not evaluate the results according to API 570 unless it is
specifically trained and authorized by the owner or user.
Fragilization
Loss of ductility and toughness that occurs in high alloy steels susceptible.
like the 1.25 and 2.25Cr due to prolonged exposure to high temperature (700ºF to
1070ºF) ( 370ºC a 575ºC)
Imperfection
Discontinuity detected during an inspection or examination, subject to criteria of
acceptance.
Indication
A response or evidence resulting from the application of a NDT technique.
Inspection The rules related to inspection are those that dictate frequencies
minimum inspection requirements and their scope and the inspection and evaluation methods
results.
Owner/User Inspector
Inspector employed by the manufacturer who has qualified under the forecasts of section 4 and
Appendix A of API 570 or according to A2 and complies with jurisdictional requirements.
Alloyed material
Material that contains alloying elements such as Cr, Ni, or Mo that are
intentionally added to improve mechanical properties or resistance to
corrosion.
MT
Examination by Magnetizable Particles.
NPS
Nominal Pipe Size
On Stream
Pipe that contains amounts of process fluid.
On Stream Inspection
Inspection used to determine fitness to continue in service.
The system may or may not be in service while the inspection is being carried out. Rules apply.
NDT procedures. Inspection carried out essentially from the outside of the
pipeline.
Repair Organization
Applies to any of the following:
Holder of applicable ASME stamp.
owner or user who repairs their own pressure pipes according to
this Inspection Code.
A contractor who possesses acceptable qualifications for the owner or user
and repairs pressure pipes in accordance with this Inspection Code.
An Organization or individual authorized by a legal Jurisdiction
Detention point
Point in the repair process alteration from which the work cannot proceed.
continue until an inspection is carried out.
Rehearsal point
Area defined by a circle no more than 2in (50mm in diameter for tubes of
size no greater than NPS 10 and diameter of no more than 3in (75mm) for larger lines.
The thicknesses measured within these areas can be averaged. The point of
the essay must be within Thickness Measurement Locations TML)
Injection point
Location where a small amount of materials is injected inside the
current of the process, for chemical control or other process variables. (Does not include
localizations where the currents of two processes mix
PT
Liquid Penetrant Examination.
PWHT
Post-Weld Heat Treatment
Dead branches
Parts of systems that normally do not have significant fluid circulation.
Repair
It is an activity carried out to restore a degraded pipe in such a way as to return it to its original condition.
capacity according to the original design.
Temporary Repair
Repair carried out to restore sufficient integrity to operate safely until
that a definitive repair can be scheduled and carried out. The deadline must be accepted.
by the inspector or pipeline engineer.
Rerating
A change in the temperature range, MAWP or both.
RT
Radiographic Examination
Design temperature
The temperature for which the corresponding pressure requires the thickness.
larger or higher rating. It is the same concept defined in ASME B31.3 and others
sections and is subject to the same tolerances for variations in temperature or pressure
or both. Different components of the system may have different temperatures of
design.
TML
Thickness Measurement Locations: Defined areas in the piping systems
where inspections and thickness measurements are performed periodically.
Auxiliary pipe
Instrument and equipment tubing, typically of small diameter and that
it can be isolated from the main pipe.
UT
Ultrasound Examination.
WFMT
Examination by Wet Fluorescent Magnetic Particles.
Maintenance inspection;
Re-rating;
Repair and
Alteration.
He is responsible for:
Develop, Implement, Execute and Evaluate the System and procedures of
pipeline inspection according to this Code.
Pipeline Engineer
He is responsible to the Owner/User for the activities related to the
design, engineering review, analysis or evaluation of pipelines covered by API 570.
Repair organization.
He is responsible to the Owner/User for ensuring that materials are used,
equipment, quality control and techniques for maintaining and repairing systems of
Pressure pipes according to the requirements of API 570.
Other Personnel.
Operations and Maintenance staff or other personnel with knowledge and
experience in systems in particular, is responsible for alerting the inspector
authorized the engineer in pipelines of any abnormal condition and by providing
assistance when required.
However, adjustment tactics for inspections and strategies that assess the
The consequences of a failure should also be considered.
A great job has been done in this area and this method is used in a great
number of industries.
Basically, risk can be defined as the mathematical product between the
probability of an incident occurring and the consequence it would have in case of
to occur.
The probability of failure is based on the identification and evaluation of the different
potential degradation mechanisms.
The consequence of the failure is based on the safety of people and effects
economic.
The probability and consequence related to all mechanisms must be evaluated.
deterioration that may reasonably occur.
under tensions (internal or external) and other forms of corrosion or mechanical deterioration
like fatigue, creep, etc.
This evaluation must also include the effectiveness of the techniques and equipment.
used inspections.
In an evaluation according to API 580, the suitability of the should also be included.
materials for the service, design of the pipes, if the building code is
adequate, effectiveness of corrosion monitoring programs and the quality of the
maintenance and inspection programs.
The evaluation of consequences should include the potential effects of
spill or escape of fluids including fire, explosion, toxic exposure, impact
environmental, other health-related aspects, etc.
It is essential that the evaluation is documented.
Once effective RBI has been carried out, the results can be used
para establecer una estrategia de inspección de la tubería y específicamente
determine
The most appropriate methods, techniques, equipment, and scope of inspection for
apply according to the expected deterioration mechanisms.
RBI can also be used for a possible increase of the 10-year limit between
internal inspections or 'on stream' (6.4) or the period between external inspections (6.3).
When it is used to extend the 10-year limit, this must be reviewed and
approved by a pressure piping engineer and an authorized inspector during periods
10 years old or younger.
Procedures for segregating piping systems, placing blind plates, and examining
hermeticity should be part of safety practices
In general, the section of pipe to be opened should be isolated from the sources.
of liquid, gas or hazardous vapors and be drained and purged to eliminate residues
dangerous or that affect the results of the inspection.
Before starting the work, the personnel who will carry out the tasks should
obtain permission from the personnel responsible for the operation.
Eye protection and other body protection elements must be used that
are necessary.
The equipment used must meet the applicable requirements for the type of
atmosphere in which they will be used.
In general, inspectors should be familiar with the results of
preliminary inspections and repairs before carrying out the required inspections by
API 570. API 574 provides additional recommendations.
An overview of the checks to be performed can be found in Appendix D
of API 570.
Injection points.
dead branches.
Corrosion under insulation (CUI)
Solid-Air Interfaces (S/A)
Specific services and localized corrosion.
Corrosion and Erosion/Corrosion.
Invoicing due to environmental effects.
Corrosion under coatings and deposits.
Billing for fatigue.
Billing for thermofluence.
Fragile fracture.
Damage from freezing.
For other areas of attention see IRE chapter II (API RP 571) and API RP 574 chapter 6.
Injection points:
Sometimes subjected to accelerated corrosion between normal operating cycles and
abnormal. They can be treated as separate inspection sectors and being
thoroughly inspected at regular intervals.
The recommended inspection zone includes 12in (300mm) or 3 pipe diameters.
upstream of the injection nozzle (the larger one). The downstream limit is the second
change of direction from the injection point or 25 feet (7.6m) from the first
change of address (The minor). Sometimes it may be convenient to extend the
injection circuit to the next pressure equipment.
Additionally, TML must be established in the appropriate accessories, points of
impact of the injected fluid, anterior and posterior limits of the injection circuit and
It may be convenient to establish intermediate points in long circuits.
In addition, a more thorough inspection must be carried out in the 12in (300mm) area.
upstream and 10 pipe diameters downstream of the injection point.
Dead branches:
The corrosion rate of these areas can vary significantly with respect to the
active adjacent pipe.
The inspector should monitor the thicknesses of the selected dead branches.
including both ends the one that connects to the active tube and the opposite one that can
contain stagnant fluid.
In pipes that operate at high temperatures, the high points due to the
convective currents that occur in the dead branch.
The removal of dead branches that will not be used should be considered.
future processes.
Soil-Air Interfaces.
This interface in buried systems without adequate cathodic protection must
to be included in the scheduled periodic external inspections.
Damage to coatings, exposed pipes, and depth should be checked.
stings.
If significant corrosion is observed, a thickness measurement should be carried out.
more extensive and it may be necessary to carry out excavations to determine if the
corrosion is limited to the soil-air interface or is it more extensive.
Thickness measurements can expose the metal of the tube and accelerate the
corrosion if the paint or coating is not quickly and adequately replaced.
An inspector with knowledge of the service and where it can take place.
corrosion.
Extensive use of non-destructive testing.
Communication by the operations staff of abnormal conditions
que puedan afectar la velocidad de corrosión.
A few examples of where this type of corrosion can occur are the following:
Groundwater below injection points and groundwater above separators
products.
Dew points in condensate flows.
Unforeseen contact of acids or caustics with non-alloyed or caustic systems
with steel systems without heat treatment.
Turbulent areas and mixing phase in acid fluids.
Mix of carbon steel grades in service of corrosive high-temperature oil
temperature (450ºF (230ºC)) and sulfur content greater than 0.5% by weight.
Note: Steels that are not treated with Si such as SA53 and API5L can
Corrode at higher speeds than the calm ones to Si, for example A106
especially in atmosphere with hydrogen sulfide at high temperature.
Corrosion under deposits of sludge, crystallized solutions or coke.
Erosión y Corrosión/Erosión.
Erosion can be defined as the removal of material from the surface due to
numerous individual impacts of solid or liquid particles.
It can be characterized by notches, grooves, rounded holes, undulation.
superficial, valleys, etc.
oSCC by carbonates.
oSCC where wet hydrogen sulfide may exist. Example processes with
acid water (hydrogen sulfide)
Hydrogen blisters and hydrogen-induced cracking (HIC).
When process deposits such as coke exist, it should be investigated whether there is corrosion.
activates beneath them.
Fatigue cracking
It can result from excessive cyclical efforts that are normally below
the resistance to static creep of the material.
The number of cycles required for the crack to propagate is much lower.
that the number of cycles needed to start.
For this reason, it is important that the design of the installation prevents its occurrence.
Cracking is accelerated by the interaction of creep and fatigue, especially when the
service is cyclical at creep temperatures.
The inspector should pay attention to the areas of stress concentration.
In the presence of high temperatures, the properties can also be modified.
mechanical and microstructural properties of materials.
NDT techniques suitable for detecting these defects are MT, PT, UT, RT.
in-situ metallography. Acoustic emission can also be applied when the cracks are
activated by the efforts of the pressure test.
Fragile fracture
Carbon steels, low alloy steels, and other ferritic steels may be susceptible to
brittle fracture at or below room temperature.
It is not a phenomenon related to thin wall thicknesses.
The largest number of cases occurs in the first application of a certain level of
effort. (Pressure or overload test) unless defects occur
critics during the service.
The possibility of brittle fracture must be considered when conducting a new test.
of pressure and more carefully evaluated if a pneumatic test is carried out or applied
overload.
Special attention should be paid to 2.25Cr steels due to their susceptibility to
fragilization (tempering) and in ferritic stainless steels.
Freeze damage
Thickness measurement
It is carried out to determine the remaining thickness. It can be done with the system
in service or out of service. It must be carried out by the inspector or examiner.
It is carried out to check the external condition of the pipe, insulation, painting.
coating, supports and other associated elements, check for signs of misalignment,
vibration and losses.
This inspection can be performed with the system in service. API 574 contains
information of interest to assist in carrying out this inspection.
The inspector should inspect the system to verify if there are any deviations from the design.
among others, temporary repairs, unsuitable flanges or valves not included in
plans or records.
The external visual inspection should be carried out by the inspector who also
should be responsible for the custody of records and inspection of repairs.
When accepted by the inspector, operations and maintenance personnel can
perform external inspection. For this, they must be qualified according to API 570 to
through appropriate training.
Other significant movements of the lines must also be reported that can
for example, originating from water hammer, liquid hammer in steam pipes, or
abnormal thermal expansion.
Supplementary inspection.
Another type of inspection can be scheduled. as deemed appropriate or
necessary.
TML are specific areas located along the piping circuit where
inspections will be carried out.
The nature of the TML varies depending on its location along the pipeline.
For the selection of the TML, the corrosion potential must be considered.
Systems with high consequences in case of failures should have more quantity of
TML in areas with high corrosion rate, localized corrosion and should be
monitored more frequently.
The minimum thickness at each TML must be located by ultrasonic scanning or profiling.
Radiographic. Electromagnetic techniques can also be used for detection
thin areas that can later be measured with UT or RT.
The minimum thickness or an average of thicknesses within the TL must be recorded and
used to calculate the corrosion rate, the residual life, and the period for the
next inspection according to section 7.
The TML should be selected based on the expected phenomena: CUI; interface
soil-air, localized corrosion, generalized corrosion, etc.
The TML should be registered in inspection plans and/or on the pipe in such a way that
allow repetitive measurements in the same locations.
This procedure provides data for a more accurate calculation of the speed of
corrosion.
Selection of TML
In the selection of quantity and location of TML, the inspector should take into account the
expected corrosion pattern.
In these cases, the amount of TML required is less than what is needed for
monitor circuits where localized corrosion occurs.
TML may not be used when any of the following conditions apply:
The radiographic profile may not require removing insulation or coatings and for this reason
it can be considered as an alternative.
When the corrosion is not uniform or when the measured thickness is close to the
minimum required, additional measurements must be taken. For these cases it is
it is appropriate to use ultrasonic scanning or radiographic profiling. Eddy currents also
can be applied.
Inappropriate calibration.
Painting or shells.
Excessive surface roughness.
Oscillation of the probe/palpator. (On curved surfaces)
Subsurface imperfections (laminations)
Effects of temperature.
Thicknesses less than 1/8 in (3.2 mm) (in typical digital gauges)
Pattern of uneven corrosion that makes it difficult to detect the smallest thickness.
It is important that the measurement of the minimum thickness can be repeated at the location.
as close as possible.
Piping that contains accessories series 300 or higher, made of stainless steel should
practice using potable water (250ppm max of chlorides) or condensate
vapor. After the trial, they should be drained, with vent points open in the
highest parts of the system, and dry by blowing with air or another means.
Before filling with water and pressure testing, the configuration must be analyzed.
pipe support.
If the test pressure exceeds the lowest calibration pressure of the valves.
for pressure relief, these should be removed. As an alternative to removing the valves
Devices can be applied to maintain the closure disks of the valves. It is not
It is recommended to apply more load to the springs.
Other devices such as rupture discs, glass indicators, expansion joints and
Others who cannot withstand the test pressure must be removed or isolated.
Once the pressure test is finished, the devices are removed or conditioned.
they must be reinstalled or reactivated.
Líneas que contengan juntas de expansión que no puedan ser retiradas ni bloqueadas
they can be tested at lower pressure according to the principles of ASME B31.3.
If shut-off valves are used to isolate sectors, the system must be suitable.
do not exceed the allowable pressure according to ASME B 16.34 or information
applicable from the valve manufacturer.
If a piping system can fail due to the use of inappropriate materials, the
inspector may consider the need to investigate the existing materials in the
pipe.
Components that meet the criteria of the PMI test (API RP 578 section 6)
They must be identified for replacement.
The inspector must conduct periodic examinations with NDT until the
identified components should be replaced.
The body of the valve is thicker than the tubes and others for design reasons.
pipeline components.
When the valves are disassembled for maintenance and inspection, it can
a different corrosion pattern occurs.
When a pressure test is conducted on the valve body or its closures, it should be
carried out according to API RP 598.
The inspection of the quality of the welds is normally part of the activities.
of construction, repair, or alteration. However, the welds are
inspected for corrosion detection through radiographic profiling or inspection
internal.
When it is detected that corrosion is attacking the welds differentially, they must
select for inspection, more welds within the piping circuit.
It should also be attempted to determine whether the cracks are from the original construction or
they may be due to the environmental cracking mechanism.
original and that do not meet those acceptance criteria but have supported the
pressure testing and perform satisfactorily in service. Another case may be
to be the welds of branch connections that have not been inspected during
the original construction.
The flanges and bolts/screws of the valve bonnets should be examined for
detect corrosion.
The simplified classification provided in this section based on the consequences of failures
It is used to determine the frequency and extent of inspection.
After the effective evaluation has been carried out, the results can be
used to plan a more effective inspection strategy among what is
includes:
The most appropriate methods, techniques, equipment, and scope of inspection for
apply based on the expected deterioration mechanisms.
inspection given in table 6.2. (Approval from the engineer and inspector is required)
pipes)
When RBI is applied, the inspection intervals should not exceed the given limits.
in table 6.1.
All piping processes must be classified into classes. This allows for the application of the
greater inspection efforts in the systems that require it.
In general, systems with the highest classification (1) require more inspection.
exhaustive and shorter intervals in order to ensure its integrity to continue
the operation safely.
The owner/user must maintain the record of the fluids handled and their
classification.
API RP 750 and NFPA 704 contain information that may be useful for
classify the services.
Class 1.
Class 2
Services not included in other classes are class 2. This classification includes the majority.
of the services. Examples of these services are:
Class 3
Flammable services that do not vaporize (significantly) when there are losses and not
They are located in high activity areas.
Potentially dangerous services for humans but located in low areas
activity can be classified in this class.
The interval between inspections must be set and maintained following the following
criteria:
The owner/user or the inspector must set the intervals for measurement of
thicknesses and external visual inspection and when applicable internal inspection or
supplementary.
Smaller intervals may be advisable in certain cases. Before using the table
6.1 the corrosion rate should be calculated according to 7.1.3.
Table 6.1 contains maximum inspection intervals for the three classes of service
and for injection points and soil-air interface (S/A)
They must be conducted within the maximum intervals of table 6.1 to evaluate the
items indicated in appendix D of this standard summarized in the checklist that
this will be included later). Alternatively, inspection intervals can be defined.
applying RBI (API-580)
The result of the inspection should be documented to allow for its tracking.
END according to table 6.2, should also be carried out in areas where
suspects that there is the possibility of CUI.
If areas with CUI are detected, the inspection must be extended until it is ensured that it
inspect 100% of the damaged area.
The extension of the CUI program in table 6.2 should consider the configuration.
of the piping and areas with a likelihood of suffering this deterioration. The probability can
to be influenced by:
Weather conditions.
Insulation design.
Quality of paint.
Process conditions.
Systems that have a remaining useful life calculated as greater than 10 years or that are
adequately protected against external corrosion do not need to be included within
from the inspection recommended in table 6.2. However, the condition of the insulation
must be determined.
This representative sample should have data from all types of components and
orientations (vertical, horizontal).
From this representative sample, it is advisable to have data from the first
measurements, the measurements from the previous inspection.
Small diameter:
Small diameter pipes (SBP) that are part of the primary process must
to be inspected according to what is indicated.
The small diameter pipes (SBP) that are of secondary process have
different minimum requirements depending on the class of service.
Auxiliary piping
The inspection of auxiliary piping, SBP associated with instrumentation and machinery, is
optional.
The criteria for determining if the auxiliary SBP piping requires any inspection.
include the following:
Classification.
Potential for environmental cracking.
Potential corrosion based on neighboring primary systems.
The potential CUI.
Threaded connections.
The requirements are as indicated above for auxiliary systems and SBP.
When TML is selected in threaded joints, only those that are included are
They can be X-rayed during the scheduled inspection.
The threaded joints associated with machinery and subject to fatigue damage should
to be continually evaluated and consider their renewal for a thicker one
or replaced by welded joint.
establishedbyRBI
bVersion 5.3.4.
Ap.D:“ListadeVerificaciónparaInspecciónExternadeTuberíadeProceso”
Item/inspected system:
Date.
Acceptable
Part
WHO Comments
a. Losses
Process
Vaportrails
Existing clamps
b. Dethreading
Pipe
Movementrestriction
Expansion joints.
c. Vibration
Inadequate support
Excessivemisalignedweight
Thin, small, or alloyed pipe.
Threaded connections
Loss of support/material wear
d. Supports
Out of place shoes
Distortion/breakage of hangers
Affected springs
Distortion/breakage of brackets/columns.
Sliding plates
Conditionofcounterweights.
Corrosiononsupports
e. Corrosion
Pipingandcomponentsstatus
Corrosionunderboltedclamps
Deterioration of paint/coating
Soil-airinterface
Interfaceswithisolation
Biologicalcorrosion.
f. Thermal insulation
Damage in penetrations
Deterioration/lack of mechanical protection
Seal deterioration.
Deformation.
Discontinuities.
The short-term (ST) and long-term (LT) corrosion rates can be calculated with
the following formulas.
t(initial)− t(actual)
Corrosion rate (LT)=
time_between_initial_and_actual
t(previous)− t(actual)
Corrosion speed (ST)=
time_between_measurements_of_tprevio_and_tactual
t(initial): Measured thickness (inch or mm) during initial installation or during the
development of a new corrosion rate, in the same area as tactual .
Thickness measured (inches or mm) during the previous inspection of the same
tactile area
If there are signs that the corrosion rate was not correctly assumed, the
the speed to be used for the next period must be adjusted.
7.2 MAWP.
The calculations can be performed for known materials and the requirements are met.
principles of the applicable Code:
Unknown paramaterials can assume the degree and efficiency of joints more.
lower provisions of the applicable Code.
When recalculating the MAWP, the thickness to be used is the current one minus two times the
expected corrosion until the next inspection.
Table 7.1: Examples of calculating MAWP based on the corrosion method at half of the remaining life
Example 1
Design pressure 500psi(3447kPa)
Design temperature
Tube [Link].;A106GrB
Outer diameter 16in(406mm)
Maximumallowableeffort(S) 20000psi (137900kPa)
Longitudinal joint efficiency (E) 1.0
Thicknessdeterminedininspection 0.32in(8.13mm)
Corrosion rate (7.1.1) 0.01in/yr(0.254mm/year)
Nextplannedinspection 5years
Estimated corrosion up to approx. 0.05 in/yr (1.27 mm/year)
Inspection
MAWP 2SE(tact-2*timeuntilnextinsp.*corrosionspeed)/D
USunits
SI Units
Result OK
Example 2 Sameasexample1butchangingthedateofthenextinspection.
Nextplannedinspection 7years
Estimated corrosion up to approx. 0.07 in/yr (1.78 mm/year)
Inspection
MAWP 2SE(tact-2*timeuntilnextinsp.*Corrosionspeed)//D
USunits
SI Units
The minimum pipe thickness must be at least equal to the minimum thickness.
required or to the withdrawal thickness (whichever is greater) and must be based on
pressure, mechanical and structural considerations using the formulas
adequate and the maximum efforts permitted by the applicable Code.
In services with significant consequences in case of failure, it can be included in the design.
additional thicknesses for unforeseen or unknown loads or losses of
undiscovered materials
The components that have deteriorated to the point that their capacity is compromised.
withstand pressure and other loads, must be evaluated to determine their suitability
to continue in service.
Methods such as those contained in API RP 579 can be applied. The following
API 579 evaluation techniques can be applied as an alternative to the
given in API 570 point 5.7.
The larger the diameter and the greater the temperature differences, the more attention is given.
requires flexibility.
Comparing the expected movements in engineering with the real ones can
determine if there are unexpected movements.
7.6 Records.
Users and pipe owners must maintain permanent records and
progressives of each system covered by API 570.
Service class
Classification.
Identification numbers.
Inspection intervals.
Types of essay.
Name of examiners and people conducting trials.
Results of thickness measurements and other tests.
Permanent and definitive repairs.
Alterations.
Rerating.
Design/Blueprint information.
Maintenance activities that may affect the integrity of the system.
Date and results of external inspections.
The use of computer systems to record, store data and perform calculations.
it should be considered in light of the volume of information to be handled
will apply among others for:
The principles of the ASME B31.3 Code or the Code under which the system was built.
They should be followed.
Authorization:
Any repair or alteration must be approved by the Inspector before it is
initiated by the repair organization.
Authorization for alterations should not be granted until an experienced engineer
In pressure pipe design, it has been consulted and this has approved the
repairs and/or alterations.
The inspector will indicate the stopping points and may grant authorizations to some.
routine repairs.
Approval:
The inspector or the piping engineer must approve any repair or alteration.
after conducting an inspection that demonstrates that the established requirements
have been fulfilled and that the pressure test, if required, was witnessed.
Temporary repairs:
Longitudinal cracks should not be repaired this way unless the engineer approves.
pipes determine that they will not propagate
If the repair is localized, for example on an area with dents or a hole and
the specified minimum yield strength (SMYS) does not exceed 40000 psi (276 MPa).
A repair can be made with a coupling or patched with fillet welds. (See 8.2.3
and appendix C)
Minor losses can be repaired using some element that encloses them.
whenever the remaining thickness in the weld area of this element to the tube
it is sufficient and the material of the tube can withstand welding without subsequent damage.
Permanent repairs.
Repair of defects can be carried out by preparing the area with a bevel/groove in
In U or V with the depth and length according to what the defect to be repaired requires.
performing a fill with welding material deposited according to 7.2.
The thickness in corroded areas can be restored through deposited welding.
according to 8.2
Surface irregularities and contamination must be eliminated before proceeding.
the deposition of solder.
If it is possible to take the pipe out of service, the defects can be removed by cutting a section.
of piping or replacing fittings.
In the design of these repairs, the axial loads that must be considered should be taken into account.
support and the possible effects on the tube to be repaired.
The procedure may include the injection of sealants. Their consideration should be taken into account.
influence on the process and other mechanical elements.
When appropriate, the added elements must be removed and the integrity
the pipe must be restored.
This applies to P-1 steels listed in ASME B31.3. P-3 steels, with the exception of
Mn-Mo steels can also receive this preheating temperature.
when the operating temperature is high enough to provide a
adequate toughness and there are no dangers during the pressure test and startup and
system shutdown.
Piping systems built with other steels that initially required PWHT
they are usually PWHT.
The application of the PWHT alternative requires consultation with the piping engineer.
to analyze the risk of environmental cracking and whether the welding procedure
will provide adequate toughness.
PWHT.
PWHT should be carried out according to the guidelines of ASME B31.3 or the Code
of construction.
8.2.3 Design
The joints must be at full penetration.
New connections can be made anticipating the design, location, and method.
The fixation complies with the requirements of the applicable Code.
8.2.4 Materials.
The material used in the repair or alteration must meet the requirements.
from the applicable section of the ASME Code.
The material must have recognized weldable quality and be compatible with the material.
original.
8.2.5 END
For the acceptance of repairs and welded alterations must be included
examination through NDT in accordance with the applicable Code and specifications of
owner/user, unless API 570 requires otherwise.
When the pressure test is not necessary or practicable, NDT should be used instead.
place. Consultation with an experienced engineer in pressure pipes is necessary and
con el inspector autorizado.
When it is not feasible to perform a pressure test on the final joint connection between
new and existing parts must apply the following:
The replacement pipe must undergo pressure testing and be examined accordingly.
requires the Code that governs the design of the piping system. If it is not feasible
An appropriate END can be carried out according to what the inspector specifies.
authorized and the following must be fulfilled:
8.3 Re-rating.
The rerating of a pipe due to a change in MAWP and/or temperature is allowed if it
they meet the following requirements:
There are calculations made by the manufacturer or the engineer in pressure pipes.
from the owner/user (or their designated agent) justify the re-rate.
The re-rate meets the requirements of the original building code or the
latest edition.
Inspection records must allow for determining that the piping is suitable for
the service being proposed that has sufficient oversize for corrosion
future. The rerating must be based on measurements of recent and valid thicknesses.
Re-rated systems must undergo loss testing in accordance with
Original construction code or current edition for new conditions of
service unless the system has been tested at least once at a pressure
equal to or greater than required. If the rerating does not affect the tension/stress
admissible no pressure test required.
The system is reviewed to verify that the pressure relief valves
required are present.
The re-rate and the pipe inspection must be accepted by the Inspector.
Authorized.
All system components such as valves, flanges, fittings,
bolts/screws, sealing elements and expansion joints are suitable for
the new pressure and temperature conditions.
The flexibility of the system is suitable for the new conditions.
The engineering records have been updated.
The decrease in the minimum design temperature is justified with tests.
of impact if this is required by the design code.
The re-rate is considered finished when the Authorized Inspector supervises the
placement of an additional identification plate with the information
APPENDIX C
C.1 Repairs
Weld repairs using SMAW or GMAW processes can be carried out.
When the temperature is below 50ºF (10ºC), low electrodes should be used.
hydrogen (AWS E-XX16 or E-XX18), when welding ASTM A-53 Gr. A materials
y B; A-106 Gr. A and B; A-333; A 334; API-5L and similar.
When using AWS E-XX16 or E-XX18 electrodes for welds 2 and 3 of the figure.
C-1, the welds must start at the bottom and be performed in a consistent manner.
ascending. The diameter should not exceed 5/32in (4.0mm). Larger electrodes
diameter, not exceeding 3/16in (4.8mm), can be used for welding 1 of the
Figure C-1. This weld must have a backing or preparation in such a way that the
welding does not bond the main tube. This can be avoided if checked through
ultrasonic measurements that the thickness of the main tube is sufficient to support
welding.
Repairs and welding on service lines must comply with API public
2201.
The diameter of the electrode should not exceed 5/32in (4.0mm). When the
temperatures are below 32ºF (0ºC) low electrodes should be used
Hydrogen. Oscillating welding with low hydrogen electrode should be avoided.
The corners of the patches must have a minimum radius of curvature of 1in (25mm)
The inspection of this type of systems is essentially different from that of the systems.
airborne, because significant external deterioration can occur due to the conditions
corrosive soils
Due to the fact that the inspection is limited by inaccessibility, API 570 deals with
this topic separately.
Important reference information can be found in NACE 0169, 0274, and 0275.
and section 11 of API RP 0651.
Monitoring the route where the pipeline is laid can be a method of inspection.
The soil resistivity measurement should be carried out using the Wenner method.
Four-Pin according to ASTM G-57.
Refer to NACE 0169 and section 11 of API RP 0651 for applicable guidelines.
to inspect and maintain cathodic protection systems of buried lines.
Inspection methods.
Several inspection methods are available. Some can reveal the state of the
The exterior wall of the pipe and others can reveal the condition of the interior. Examples:
Excavation: In many cases the only available alternative is to dig up the pipe.
in order to visually inspect it and measure thicknesses. Caution must be taken.
by removing the soil to prevent damage to the pipe protection. The last 5
inches of soil should be moved manually. The consideration of the must also be taken into account.
safety aspects and the possibility of collapse.
Potential tube-soil:
Short interval monitoring of cathodically protected lines can be
used to determine that the line has protective potential throughout its entire length.
In lines with poor paint or coating where the protection potential
Cathodic is inadequate; monitoring can be conducted every 5 years.
In lines without cathodic protection or where losses have been detected, it may
measurement of tube-soil potential along the line should be carried out.
excavations where active corrosion has been detected. A continuous potential profile or
short interval monitoring may be necessary to detect the areas with
active corrosion.
Soil corrosiveness:
For buried lines longer than 100 feet (30 meters) that are not protected
Cathodically, soil corrosivity assessment should be conducted every 5 years.
Soil corrosivity measurements can be made for classification.
relative to soil corrosivity.
Cathodic protection:
For the determination of the inspection frequency, the guidelines must be followed
NACE 0169 and section 11 of API RP 0651
Another alternative is the use of acoustic emission or the addition of a tracer gas (By
example helium or sulfur hexafluoride)
Repairs to paintings:
For paint repairs, the inspector should take the following into account:
sufficient adherence between the paint and the pipe to prevent the
moisture migration beneath the paint film.
Sufficient ductility to avoid cracking.
9.4 Records.
The records of buried pipes must be maintained as indicated.
in section 7 (7.6). The location of temporary clamps must be included.
An inspection program designed to effectively detect localized corrosion should include comprehensive elements such as identifying potential corrosion sites, using appropriate inspection techniques like ultrasonic and radiographic testing, and periodic monitoring . The program should prioritize areas with high corrosion risk, such as dead ends, flanges, and connections. Additionally, use of risk assessment to focus inspections and planning based on environmental and operational influences, such as exposure to chlorides and operating temperatures, is essential .
Corrosion under insulation (CUI) affects materials such as carbon steel and austenitic stainless steel differently. In carbon steels, CUI typically results in localized corrosion, while in austenitic stainless steels, it can lead to chloride stress corrosion cracking . External conditions that contribute to CUI include exposure to moisture through rain, water leaks, or condensation, especially in systems operating between 25ºF (-4ºC) and 250ºF (120ºC). The extent of CUI also depends on environmental factors such as local climate, including marine environments or areas exposed to fog or steam .
The significance of post-weld heat treatment (PWHT) lies in its ability to relieve residual stresses, improve ductility, and decrease the risk of environmental cracking in welded joints . Factors for an effective PWHT include maintaining a minimum preheating temperature of 300ºF (150ºC) during welding, ensuring proper thermocouple monitoring, and considering material properties and thickness to ensure heat is evenly applied . These measures help to ensure the joint meets the required mechanical properties and integrity standards under the Code .
To detect and manage corrosion at soil-air interfaces, scheduled external inspections are vital, especially in unprotected systems. It's essential to check for damage to coatings and inspect for corrosion signs. Thickness measurement is advised if significant corrosion is observed, possibly requiring excavation to determine if corrosion is extensive beyond the soil-air interface . If adequate cathodic protection is present, excavation is usually necessary only when coating damage is evident .
Enhanced inspection areas near injection points in piping systems are significant due to the possibility of accelerated corrosion. The specific areas for inspection include 12 inches (300mm) or 3 pipe diameters upstream of the injection nozzle and downstream at the second change of direction from the injection point or 25 feet (7.6m) from the first change . These areas are critical because they are subjected to different corrosion if there are variations between normal and abnormal operating cycles .
A welded joint in a piping system can skip pressure tests after repairs if it meets certain criteria. The welded joint must be a butt weld between components of equal diameter and thickness. Additionally, alternatives such as S150 clamps or SO S150 for temperatures not exceeding 500ºF (260ºC) can be considered. All tests need authorized inspector specifications: radiographic inspection or ultrasonic testing (UT) are mandated for ensuring joint integrity .
Re-rating of a piping system is permissible when changes in Maximum Allowable Working Pressure (MAWP) and/or temperatures are necessary and justified by calculations from a qualified engineer . Considerations during the re-rating process include ensuring all system components, such as valves and expansion joints, are suitable for new conditions and that records confirm the system's adequacy for future service . Additionally, re-rating must comply with the original construction code or latest edition and consider recent thickness measurements to ensure longevity and compliance with operational safety requirements .
The selection and maintenance of Thickness Measurement Locations (TML) are crucial because they provide key data for assessing corrosion rates and residual life of piping systems . TMLs must be strategically located in areas of high corrosion potential, including those with localized or general corrosion. Accurate TML location allows repetitive measurements, ensuring that data collected over time is comparable for better corrosion rate calculations, ultimately aiding in planning maintenance and inspections .
Material traceability in the repair and alteration of alloyed piping systems is important to ensure that materials used match those of the original design and construction to prevent material failure . Procedures involve verification against design requirements, performing 100% positive material identification (PMI) checks where necessary, and using risk assessment to prioritize checks . These actions ensure that the piping systems maintain integrity and performance according to their intended specifications .
When performing pressure tests on piping systems, precautions are advised to account for temperature effects and valve protection. Materials such as austenitic stainless steels require alkaline water solutions to prevent stress corrosion cracking . Valves must be protected by removing or securing pressure relief devices if test pressures exceed their calibration limits. Expansion joints and other non-withstand components should also be removed or isolated . The configuration of pipe support must be analyzed to prevent damage during the test .