0% found this document useful (0 votes)
11 views19 pages

Understanding Sea Wave Types and Behavior

ertdtfhg hgjh oijlkm oip; l

Uploaded by

Himanshu Patel
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
11 views19 pages

Understanding Sea Wave Types and Behavior

ertdtfhg hgjh oijlkm oip; l

Uploaded by

Himanshu Patel
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Sea waves (also known as 'chop')

Longer period waves move faster and reach distant sites first, & shorter
period waves may reach the site several days later. This process is called
WAVE DISPERSION. It implies that low-frequency (long-period)
waves have a greater propagation speed than high-frequency waves.
 Evanescent Wave: Found near structures or boundaries, such as
seabed, breakwaters, or around piers. A wave that decays
exponentially in space, typically not propagating energy.

 Solitary Wave: is a single wave crest that travels steadily without


changing its shape and size.
The wave breaking conditions:

H/d ≥ 0.78 - shallow water depths

H/L ≥ 0.14 - deeper water depths

crest angle < 120 degree


The HHW & LLW occur when the centers of the three celestial bodies
involved passes through a common straight line, a phenomenon
(SYZYGY) that takes place in every 11 years and 11 days.
#Sainflou (1928)
➡️Non-breaking waves (for deep water)
➡️assumes force is essentially hydrostatic
➡️Based on standing waves
➡️Uses trochoidal wave theory
➡️Pressure distribution when wave crest arrives
➡️Pressure distribution when wave trough arrives

#Minikin (1950) - used in U.S.


➡️breaking waves
➡️Based on wave pressure records and shock pressure
➡️pressure distribution with peak pressure at or near the still-water level
➡️vertical breakwater resting on rubble mound
➡️impact pressure decreases parabolically to zero at z = -0.5H
➡️generally overestimates pressures

#Goda (1974) - current Japanese standard


➡️breaking and non-breaking waves (for shallow & intermediate depths)
➡️based on model tests
➡️design against single largest wave force in design sea state
➡️uses highest wave in wave group
➡️Hmax is estimated at 5H1/3 seaward of breakwater
➡️modified to incorporate random wave breaking model
➡️assumes trapezoidal shape for pressure distribution along front
➡️Caisson is imbedding into the rubble mound
➡️Uplift pressure distribution is assumed triangular

You might also like