Understanding Cybercrime: Key Concepts
Understanding Cybercrime: Key Concepts
School of ICT
By
ICTU20223052
[Link]@[Link]
Summary
Understanding Cybercrime
Cybercrime is made up of criminal or illegal activities carried out through information and
communication technologies, whose main target is computers and destroying cyberspace.
These crimes can range from identity theft to phishing scams.
While traditional crimes like murder and theft are not directly influenced by technology
that is computers inclusive, the planning and of such acts have increasingly involved ICTs
as decades pass by.
Theft: Criminals now involve themselves in online theft through e-commerce platforms,
stealing goods or sensitive information like credit card numbers without coming into
contact directly with the user.
Fraud: Traditional fraud operandum’s have evolved into complicated online scams such as
phishing, where attackers impersonate legitimate entities that is pretending to be an
organization or entity you are not to steal personal information.
Categories of Cybercrime
External Cybercrime: Involves attacks from outside an organization meaning not from
within the organization, leading to financial losses or data breaches. examples are hacking
and ransomware attacks.
Online Vandalism
Online vandalism, or in other words digital vandalism, consist of activities like website
defacement, where unauthorized users modify a website’s content, and social media abuse,
where harmful or illegal content is posted to damage a user’s reputation.
Malware Defined
Understanding Botnets
Embezzlement Explained
Copyright Infringement
This chapter highlights the intricate relationship between traditional crimes and modern
technology, illustrating the complexities of cybercrime in today’s digital world.
Are there any crimes at all that have not been touched by information, communication and
computer technologies?
Information and communication technologies have greatly impacted the world of today.
Even though traditional crimes such as vandalism, murder and theft are not directly
influenced by technology, they still play a role in the perpetration and planning of these
crimes. In addition to this, even the methods of investigation of such crimes used have seen
a great improvement over time due to technological advancement.
In conclusion, it is difficult to identify a crime which has not been touched by technology due
to the fact that ICTs have a minimal impact and influence on how these crimes are executed.
Review Questions
1. What is Cybercrime
Cybercrime refer to criminal and illegal activities carried out by attackers over a
network targeting computers and endangering the cyberspace.
Computer crimes refer to all illegal activities which are facilitated or carried out using
computers enabling the attackers to be able to maintain their anonymity and execute
their plans from anywhere in the world while traditional crime involves the
perpetrator to get in contact with the victim physically to be able to carry out the
crime.
3. Identify two or three traditional crimes in which computers are now used as an
instrument. How has the nature of these crimes changed as a result of technology?
Theft: Theft typically involved physical acts, such as breaking and entering or
shoplifting. With the rise of technology in the commerce sector, criminals can now engage in
theft through e-commerce platforms, stealing goods or conducting fraud without physical
interaction. Also, criminals can steal sensitive information, such as credit card numbers or
personal data, through hacking, leading to identity theft.
Fraud: Traditional fraud might involve scams or deceitful practices in person or via
mail. With the advancement of technology, cybercriminals can execute complex scams like
phishing, where they impersonate legitimate entities to steal sensitive information.
4. What are the two main categories of cybercrime? Provide a few examples of each
Internal cybercrime
This category involves crimes targeting individual users and their personal information
internal of an organisation. Some examples include;
- Identity Theft: Stealing personal information (e.g., Social Security numbers, bank
account details) to impersonate someone else for financial gain.
- Phishing: Sending deceptive emails or messages to trick individuals into revealing
sensitive information, such as passwords or credit card number
- External Cybercrime
This category involves crimes aimed at businesses or institutions coming from someone
external from the organisation, often resulting in financial loss or data breaches. Some
examples include;
Online vandalism, often referred to as "digital vandalism," can occur in several ways. Here
are some common forms.
To begin, it can occur through Website Defacement Unauthorized which is the modification
of a website's content, often replacing it with offensive or misleading messages, images, or
graphics. For example, Hackers gaining access to a website and changing its homepage to
display inappropriate content. It can also occur through special media abuse which involves
posting harmful or malicious content on social media profiles, including spreading false
information users posting derogatory comments or images on someone’s profile or page.
8. What is Embezzlement?
10. What are the dangers associated with online sales of prescription drugs?
The online sale of prescription drugs can be a problem for some reasons.
To begin it exposes one to Counterfeit Medications. Many online pharmacies sell fake
or substandard drugs that may contain harmful substances or incorrect dosages. Also,
it is a danger because of lack of Regulation Many online sellers operate without
proper licensing or oversight, making it difficult to ensure their legitimacy.
11. Which problems does cybercrime pose to authorities seeking to investigate it?
Cybercrime poses certain problems to authorities who are looking for ways to
investigate. Firstly, The Anonymity of Criminals. Cybercriminals often use techniques
to hide their identities, such as VPNs, proxies, or the dark web. The advancement in
technology has made it significantly easy for criminals to perpetrate such acts without
having direct contact with the victim. Also, the rapidly evolving nature of technology
prompts cybercriminals to continually adapt to the new technologies and security
measures implemented by relevant authorities; thus, authorities must constantly
update their tools and knowledge to keep up with evolving cyber threats.
Summary
In the case of United States v. Aliaksandr Zhyltsou, the defendant faced hefty charges for using a
forged birth certificate to obtain a passport which is illegal. The prosecution attempted to introduce
social media or online evidence related to Zhyltsou, hence raising issues of hearsay and
authentication.
Hearsay, defined as an out-of-court statement offered to prove the truth of the matter being
discussed or case study, was essential to the case. The court ultimately ruled the social media posts
inadmissible or not useful due to insufficient authentication linking them to Zhyltsou.
The computer forensics process involves several key steps which are: documenting the electronic
crime scene, search and seizure, evidence keeping or preservation, data acquisition, data analysis,
case analysis, reporting, and testifying as an expert witness. Investigations can sometimes be
public, conducted by a group of assigned government agencies, or private, carried out by hired
investigators.
Understanding types of evidences is very important. They are: direct, circumstantial, hearsay, and
digital evidence. Direct evidence provides factual statements or proofs that means the individual
is certainly guilty, while circumstantial evidence requires several inferences. Hearsay may be
admissible under specific conditions, such as statements made during or shortly after an event or
based on third part witnesses.
Authentication of electronic evidence is important and can be achieved through line of custody or
in more advanced scenarios chain of custody, hash values and digital signatures Standards of
evidence outline the criteria for admissibility in court, ensuring that the legal process maintains
integrity and fairness in addressing cybercrime.
Practical Exercise
For this project, you must search for and interpret information in a cybercrime case that
dealt with admitting hearsay in criminal or civil court. Provide a brief description of the case
and discuss the role of the hearsay evidence in it. You should also identify why the evidence
was admissible (or inadmissible). In your analysis, do not forget to include other types of
evidence presented in the case (e.g., direct and circumstantial...). Finally, discuss the effect of
the challenges to the authenticity of the evidence on the outcome of the case.
Case Overview
In the case of United States v. Aliaksandr Zhyltsou, the defendant was accused of using a
forged birth certificate to obtain a passport. The prosecution sought to introduce evidence
from a social networking site that allegedly belonged to Zhyltsou, which included posts that
were relevant to the case. The primary issue revolved around the admissibility of this
evidence, particularly concerning hearsay and authentication challenges.
Definition of Hearsay
Hearsay is defined as an out-of-court statement offered to prove the truth of the matter
asserted. In this case, the prosecution aimed to use social media posts as evidence of his
identity and intent, which could be considered hearsay since the posts were made outside of
the courtroom.
In Vayner, the court ultimately ruled that the social media evidence was inadmissible due to
insufficient authentication. The prosecution failed to provide adequate evidence that the
posts were indeed made by Zhyltsou, which is a critical requirement for establishing the
authenticity of hearsay evidence. The court emphasized that the government needed to
demonstrate a clear link between the defendant and the social media account to admit the
posts as evidence.
1. Direct Evidence:
o The prosecution presented direct evidence, including witness testimonies that
linked Zhyltsou to the fraudulent activities. This included testimonies from
individuals who interacted with him during the process of obtaining the
passport.
2. Circumstantial Evidence:
o Circumstantial evidence was also introduced, such as the context of the forged
documents and the circumstances under which they were obtained. This
evidence suggested a pattern of fraudulent behaviour but did not directly link
Zhyltsou to the social media posts.
Challenges to Authenticity
The challenges to the authenticity of the social media evidence significantly impacted the
case. The court's decision to exclude the hearsay evidence meant that the prosecution lost a
crucial piece of evidence that could have supported their claims. Without the social media
posts, the prosecution had to rely more heavily on direct and circumstantial evidence, which
may not have been sufficient to secure a conviction.
Review Questions
2. What are the major differences between public and private investigations?
There are several differences between public and private investigations. To begin
public investigations are carried out by government agencies which mostly include
forces of law and order while private investigations are conducted by private
investigators or firms hired by individuals.
Another major difference is the fact that the aim of public investigations is to enforce
law and prosecute criminal offences while private investigations focus on civil
matters which could be fraud, infidelity, missing persons, just to name a few.
3. What are the similarities and differences between criminal and civil law?
Criminal and civil law have certain similarities which will be explained
To begin both criminal and civil law operate within a structured legal system with
well-defined rules and regulations. Also, both protect the right of the parties involved
respectfully ensuring fair treatment and freedom to defend their case.
Firstly, criminal law aims to punish wrongdoers and maintain public order. It
addresses offenses against the state or society while civil law focuses on resolving
disputes between individuals or entities and providing compensation to the injured
party. Another difference is that in criminal law, the case is brought by the
government (prosecutor) against the accused (defendant) while in civil law The case
is brought by an individual or entity (plaintiff) against another individual or entity
(defendant).
- To ensure that individuals and organizations comply with laws and regulations
within their jurisdiction. Investigations help identify violations and enforce
compliance.
- To protect public health, safety, and welfare by investigating potential hazards, unsafe
practices, or violations that could harm individuals or communities.
- To gather evidence for enforcing regulations and policies. This includes investigating
complaints, violations, or misconduct in areas such as environmental protection,
labour standards, and consumer rights.
- To monitor industries and sectors to ensure they operate within legal parameters.
Investigations help maintain oversight of practices that may affect public interests.
In this stage, forensic investigation processes are recorded in order to analyse and
preserve evidence.
At this stage, relevant information about the case is being collected. Such information
includes the description of the incident, the case name, the location of the incident,
relevant legislation, the extent of authority to search, creating a chain of custody
document, details of equipment to be seized, carrying out a search, approval from
local management and finally health and safety precautions.
It involves the careful handling and documentation of evidence to ensure that it is free
from contamination. All physical or digital evidence collected are isolated and
secured to be able to maintain its true shape.
After collecting evidence, investigators can now process and examine the collected
data to extract information relevant to any particular case while protecting the
integrity of the data.
This stage includes the analysis of the file’s contents and a check to verify if there any
traces of file modification. The root of the incident is also identified at this stage.
The investigators now relate the data collected from evidence to the case details to be
able to understand exactly how the incident took place and how to prevent future
happenings.
-Step 7: Reporting
Here the outcome of the case analysis is documented and the report of the full
incident is made.
Slack space refers to the unused space in a file system that remains in a storage
medium after a file is saved.
- Direct Evidence
- Circumstantial evidence
- Hearsay evidence
- Digital/Electronic evidence
- Forensic evidence
10. What is the difference between circumstantial and direct evidence?
Firstly, it can be authenticated using Chain of Custody which can be used to maintain
a detailed record of who collected, handled, and stored the evidence.
Standards of evidence refer to the criteria and levels of proof required for evidence
to be admissible in court.
Providers may disclose emails voluntarily with user consent or in emergencies. The ECPA and the
USA PATRIOT Act regulate the interception of electronic communications, balancing law
enforcement needs with individual privacy rights. there's huge need for a balance between legal
balancing law enforcement and the need for individual privacy rights so as not to violate user rights
Various laws, such as the Privacy Act of 1974 and the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), govern
personal information in government databases, ensuring privacy and security. The Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, in response to financial scandals, introduced critical sections aimed at enhancing
corporate accountability and protecting whistle-blowers, thus strengthening the integrity of
financial reporting
Review Questions
3. What are the differences between content and non-content telecommunications and
electronic communications data?
- Access to Communications
The ECPA allows law enforcement agencies to obtain access to stored electronic
communications, such as emails and messages, under certain conditions. For
example, they can request access to content that has been stored for more than 180
days without a warrant, provided they have a subpoena. This provision is critical for
investigations where timely access to evidence is essential.
- Collection of Metadata
The ECPA also permits law enforcement to collect non-content data, such as
metadata, related to electronic communications without a warrant. This includes
information like the sender and recipient addresses, timestamps, and routing
information. This metadata can be crucial for establishing connections, timelines, and
patterns of behaviour in criminal investigations, even though it does not reveal the
actual content of the communications.
5. How can U.S agencies obtain subscriber records from telecommunications and
electronic communications service providers?
- Search Warrants
In cases where law enforcement seeks more detailed information, such as content of
communications or additional subscriber details, they may obtain a search warrant.
To secure a warrant, agencies must demonstrate probable cause to a judge, outlining
the relevance of the requested data to an ongoing investigation. This process provides
stronger legal authority for accessing sensitive information.
- Court Orders
Under the ECPA, law enforcement may also request court orders to obtain specific
subscriber records or communications data. This requires a higher standard than a
subpoena but is less stringent than a warrant. Agencies must show that the
information sought is relevant to an ongoing criminal investigation.
Law enforcement agencies can obtain a suspect’s email content if they secure a search
warrant. To obtain a warrant, the agency must demonstrate probable cause to a judge,
indicating that the emails are relevant to an ongoing investigation. This is the most
robust legal method for accessing email content, ensuring that privacy rights are
considered.
For emails that have been stored for more than 180 days, agencies can access content
using a subpoena without needing a warrant. This allows them to obtain basic
information about the emails, such as sender, recipient, and timestamps, as well as
the content itself. However, this method is restricted to emails that meet the time
criteria.
In certain cases, law enforcement can request a court order to access email content
or records. This requires demonstrating that the information is relevant to an
investigation but does not require the same level of probable cause as a warrant.
7. When can providers disclose emails and records to the U.S government voluntarily?
- User Consent
Providers may disclose emails and records if they have obtained explicit consent from
the user. This can occur when a user agrees to share their information during an
investigation or through service agreements that allow for such disclosures.
- Emergency Situations
8. How does ECPA and USA Patriot Act regulate the interception of electronic
communications, government access to those communications and government
access to ISP records?
The Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA) and the USA PATRIOT Act
establish key regulations regarding the interception of electronic communications
and government access to those communications and ISP records. The ECPA prohibits
unauthorized interception, requiring law enforcement to obtain a warrant based on
probable cause for real-time communications and allowing access to stored emails
over 180 days with a subpoena, while basic subscriber information can be accessed
with a subpoena. In contrast, the USA PATRIOT Act expands surveillance powers,
enabling roving wiretaps and broader definitions of relevant information, facilitating
easier interception. It allows for streamlined access to ISP records without a warrant
in certain situations and permits the use of National Security Letters (NSLs), which
allow the FBI to request specific records without a warrant, raising concerns about
privacy and civil liberties. Together, these laws balance law enforcement needs with
individual privacy protections.
10. Which sections of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 were direct results of the financial
scandal of 2001 and 2002?
- Section 404: This section mandates that companies establish and maintain internal
controls over financial reporting and requires annual assessments of their
effectiveness. It aims to prevent fraudulent financial practices.
- Section 302: This section requires senior executives to personally certify the accuracy
of financial reports. It holds executives accountable for misleading financial
statements, enhancing transparency and responsibility.
- Section 401: This section requires that financial statements disclose all material off-
balance-sheet transactions and relationships that may impact financial performance,
addressing issues related to hidden liabilities.
- Section 806: This section provides protections for whistle-blowers, encouraging
individuals to report fraudulent activities without fear of retaliation, thereby
promoting ethical behaviour within corporations.
Summary
This chapter outlines the importance of privacy and the legal laws governing searches and
seizures in every cyber investigation. These standards must be upheld very high to maintain
sanity of cyber investigations
Privacy is an important as it protects personal information and maintains trust in digital systems.
Evidence obtained through illegal searches is typically inadmissible in court due to the
exclusionary rule, which deters law enforcement from violating Fourth Amendment rights. This
chapter is very essential in understanding legal standards governing searches and seizures in
various cyber investigations
The reasonable expectation of privacy test assesses whether individuals believe their digital
information is private and if society recognizes that belief as reasonable. Employees may have a
diminished expectation of privacy at work, especially on employer-provided devices.
Government agencies usually need a search warrant to access a suspect's computer, unless
exigent circumstances or consent are present. Warrantless searches can occur under specific
conditions, such as with consent, exigent circumstances, or during lawful arrests.
Portable electronic devices can be seized and searched if officers have probable cause or if the
device is within the arrestee's immediate control. Exigent circumstances involving computers
include the imminent destruction of evidence.
A third party may consent to a search if they have authority over the property being searched. It
is very important to use search protocols to ensure evidence is collected following due procedure
and in the neatest way possible, protecting individual rights and maintaining the investigation's
integrity or in other wors its sanity and confidentiality.
2. In your opinion what is the best strategy for reviewing information on computers
and why?
Review Questions
2. Is all evidence illegally searched and seized inadmissible in court? Why do, you
think this is the case?
Evidence that is illegally searched and seized is generally inadmissible in court due to
the exclusionary rule. This legal principle is intended to deter law enforcement from
violating individuals' Fourth Amendment rights against unreasonable searches and
seizures.
5. When does the government need a search warrant to search and seize a suspect’s
computer?
The government typically needs a search warrant to search and seize a suspect's
computer when there is a reasonable expectation of privacy in the data stored on that
device. This requirement is rooted in the Fourth Amendment, which protects against
unreasonable searches and seizures. A warrant is necessary unless there are exigent
circumstances, such as imminent destruction of evidence, or if the suspect provides
consent.
6. What are some examples of warrantless searches? And under what circumstances
may they be conducted?
A portable electronic device can be seized and searched after a suspect is arrested
under specific circumstances. Generally, if the arresting officers have probable cause
to believe that the device contains evidence related to the crime, they may seize it
without a warrant. Additionally, a search incident to arrest allows officers to examine
the device if it is within the immediate control of the arrestee.
A third party can consent to a search when they have the authority or control over
the area or item being searched. This authority can arise in several situations, such as
when the third-party shares possession of the property with the suspect or has been
given permission by the suspect to access it.
Yes, search protocols should be used in investigations for several important reasons.
First, they ensure that evidence is collected systematically and consistently, which
helps maintain the integrity of the investigation. Following established protocols
minimizes the risk of overlooking critical evidence or contaminating it, which is
crucial for the case's success. Additionally, adhering to protocols helps protect the
rights of individuals involved, ensuring that searches are conducted legally and
ethically.
Viruses
The creator, Onel de Guzman, faced no punishment due to inadequate laws addressing
cyber threats at that time.
Types of malwares
Malware can be arranged into several groups (Trojan horses, viruses, and worms.) A
Trojan Horse is a deceptive program that masquerades as legitimate software but
causes harm when executed; it does not have the ability to self-replicate. In contrast, a
virus is a program that attaches itself to files and propagates when those files are run,
potentially corrupting or deleting data. A worm is a program capable of replicating itself
and spread to other systems thus significant threats to network security.
Legal Framework for DoS/DDoS Attacks The legal framework for addressing
cybercrimes includes U.S.C. § 1030, part of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA). This
statute enables prosecution for individuals who launch DoS (Denial of Service) or DDoS
(Distributed Denial of Service) attacks. Specifically, § 1030(a)(5) addresses intentional
damage to computer systems, including the transmission of programs that cause harm.
Such attacks often involve unauthorized access to networks, aligning with the prohibitions
outlined in the statute. However, there are debates about the vagueness of the term
"damage" in legal interpretations, which can complicate prosecutions.
The TCP handshake is a critical process used to establish connections between clients
and servers, typically involving three steps: SYN, SYN-ACK, and ACK. A SYN flood attack
is a malicious attempt to overwhelm a server by sending a flood of SYN requests
without completing the handshake process. This exploitation prevents legitimate users
from establishing connections, highlighting the need for effective countermeasures.
Types of Fraud
Various types of fraud exist, including identity theft, credit card fraud, insurance fraud,
investment fraud, mortgage fraud, and charity scams. Each type poses unique
challenges and risks to individuals and organizations.
A Ponzi scheme involves paying returns to earlier investors using the capital of newer
investors, rather than from profit generated by legitimate business activities.
whereas in a pump and dump scheme, the stock price is artificially inflated through
wrong statements, allowing perpetrators to sell with massive gain while leaving later
investors with worthless shares that is little or nothing.
Trade Secrets
Trade secrets are confidential business information that provides a competitive edge.
The theft of trade secrets should be criminalized to protect businesses from losses and
maintain fair competition.
The investigation reveals that Sarah's information was stolen through a phishing attack.
The cyber hacker operating under a false personality gained access to Sarah's email and
personal information by sending her a deceptive email that appeared to be from her bank
and was very similar to it pushing her to accept it hence entering sensitive information on a
scam website. This was also due to improper orientation and lack of cyber aware
Evidence to Collect
As an investigator, several types of evidence should be collected to build a case against the
perpetrator:
Computers and Smartphones: Analyse devices used by the suspect to identify malware,
phishing emails, and any tools used to create fake identities.
Log Files: Examine browser history and download logs to trace the suspect's online
activities and identify the phishing site.
Email Evidence:
Phishing Emails: Collect and analyse the phishing email sent to Sarah, including metadata
(timestamps, sender information) to trace its origin.
Victim's Email Account: Investigate Sarah's email account for any forwarded messages or
suspicious activity that could indicate how her information was compromised.
Financial Records:
Bank Statements: Review unauthorized transactions to identify patterns and potential links
to the suspect.
Credit Reports: Obtain Sarah's credit report to gather information about all accounts
opened in her name and any associated addresses or phone numbers.
Witness Testimonies:
Victim Statements: Obtain detailed accounts from Sarah about her interactions and the
timeline of events.
Bank and Credit Reporting Agency Representatives: Gather statements from
representatives who can confirm the fraudulent accounts and any actions taken.
Social Media Activity:
Analyse the suspect’s social media profiles for any evidence of identity theft, such as
boasting about fraudulent activities or connections to other victims.
Conclusion
Collecting this evidence is critical to establishing a timeline of events, linking the suspect to
the crime, and demonstrating the methods used to commit identity theft. This
comprehensive approach will aid in the prosecution of the perpetrator and provide justice
for the victim.
Review questions
Example: The ILOVEYOU Virus WHICH WAS VERY POPULAR AND COMMON
• Impact: This virus overwrote files and sent itself to contacts in the victim's
address book, causing serious harm, and it is essential to know it was spread via
email causing serious havoc
• Perpetrator: Because laws at the time did not adequately address such
cybercrimes, Onel de Guzman, the creator, was initially unpunished.
Trojan Horse: A malicious program that looks authentic or real but, when run,
causes harm. It’s also worth noting that the trojan horse is not self-replicating.
A virus is an application that affixes itself to files and propagates when those
files are run.
Spyware: Malicious software that collects user information without consent, often
monitoring activities and stealing data.
U.S.C.& 1030 is part of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA). The relevant sections
that could be used against someone who launched a DoS or DDoS attack include:
Intent to Cause Damage: The intent behind DDoS attacks aligns with the prohibitions
outlined in the statute
Legal Ambiguity: Some might claim that the interpretation of "damage" is too vague or
that the specific actions of a DDoS attack do not fit neatly within the statutory definitions.
TCP Handshake: A process used to establish a connection between a client and server,
typically involving three steps: SYN, SYN-ACK, and ACK.
SYN Flood Attack: An attack where an attacker sends a flood of SYN requests to a server
without completing the handshake, overwhelming the server and preventing legitimate
connections.
• Identity theft, Credit card fraud, Insurance fraud, Investment fraud, Mortgage, fraud
Charity scams
Ponzi Scheme: A type of investment fraud where returns are paid to earlier investors
using the capital from newer investors, rather than from profit earned
Pump and Dump: This involves inflating the price of a stock (often through false or
misleading statements) to sell at a profit, leaving later investors with worthless shares.
Intellectual Property (IP) refers to creations of the mind, such as inventions, literary and
artistic works, designs, symbols, names, and images used in commerce.
Consumer Trust: Protecting IP helps ensure quality and authenticity for consumers.
Legal Rights: It provides legal recourse against unauthorized use or infringement
Trade Secrets are practices, designs, formulas, processes, or any confidential business
information that provides a competitive edge.
Economic Impact: Theft can lead to significant financial losses for businesses.
Fair Competition: Protecting trade secrets maintains a level playing field among
competitors.
Cyber Harassment: Involves repeated and unwanted online behavior aimed at harming or
intimidating an individual. It may not involve a pattern of behavior and can occur in various
forms, such as abusive messages.
Cyber Stalking: A more severe form of harassment that involves a repeated pattern of
threatening or obsessive behavior intended to control or intimidate the victim. It often
includes monitoring, threats, and a direct intent to instill fear.