1

In the Indian parliamentary system, Money Bills and Financial Bills both deal with financial matters, but they have crucial
distinctions in their definition, scope, and the procedure for their passage. These distinctions are vital because they impact the
powers of the Lok Sabha (House of the People) and the Rajya Sabha (Council of States).

Distinguishing Between Money Bill and Financial Bill

1. Definition and Constitutional Basis:

●​ Money Bill (Article 110): A Bill is deemed to be a Money Bill if it contains only provisions dealing with all or any
of the following matters:​

○​ The imposition, abolition, remission, alteration, or regulation of any tax.

○​ The regulation of the borrowing of money or the giving of any guarantee by the Government of India, or the
amendment of the law with respect to any financial obligations undertaken or to be undertaken by the
Government of India.
○​ The custody of the Consolidated Fund or the Contingency Fund of India, the payment of money into or the
withdrawal of money from any such fund.
○​ The appropriation of money out of the Consolidated Fund of India.
○​ The declaring of any expenditure to be expenditure charged on the Consolidated Fund of India or the
increasing of the amount of any such expenditure.
○​ The receipt of money on account of the Consolidated Fund of India or the public account of India or the
custody or issue of such money or the audit of the accounts of the Union or of a State.
○​ Any matter incidental to any of the matters specified above.
○​ Crucially, the Speaker of the Lok Sabha certifies whether a bill is a Money Bill, and this decision is
final.
●​ Financial Bill (Article 117): Financial Bills are broader in scope and generally deal with financial matters but are not
exclusively restricted to the matters enumerated in Article 110. The Constitution categorizes Financial Bills into
two types:​

○​ Financial Bill (Category I) [Article 117(1)]: These bills contain provisions for any of the matters specified
in Article 110(1) (like Money Bills), but also include other general legislative matters.
○​ Financial Bill (Category II) [Article 117(3)]: These bills contain provisions that, if enacted, would involve
expenditure from the Consolidated Fund of India, but do not contain any of the matters mentioned in
Article 110. They are, in essence, ordinary bills with a financial implication.

2. Scope:

●​ Money Bill: Narrower scope, exclusively dealing with specific financial matters listed in Article 110.
●​ Financial Bill: Broader scope, covering financial matters along with other legislative provisions. All Money Bills are
Financial Bills, but not all Financial Bills are Money Bills.

3. Introduction:

●​ Money Bill: Can only be introduced in the Lok Sabha and only on the recommendation of the President.
●​ Financial Bill (Category I): Can only be introduced in the Lok Sabha and only on the recommendation of the
President. (Similar to Money Bill in this aspect)
●​ Financial Bill (Category II): Can be introduced in either House of Parliament (Lok Sabha or Rajya Sabha). No
prior recommendation of the President is required for its introduction, but presidential recommendation is
required for its consideration in each House once introduced.

4. Role of Rajya Sabha:

●​ Money Bill: The Rajya Sabha has very limited powers. It cannot reject or amend a Money Bill. It can only make
recommendations, which the Lok Sabha may or may not accept. The Rajya Sabha must return the bill to the Lok
Sabha within 14 days; otherwise, it is deemed to have been passed by both Houses. There is no provision for a joint
sitting in case of a deadlock.
●​ Financial Bill (Category I): The Rajya Sabha has full powers to reject or amend the bill, similar to an Ordinary Bill.
In case of a disagreement, the President can summon a joint sitting of both Houses to resolve the deadlock.
●​ Financial Bill (Category II): The Rajya Sabha has full powers to reject or amend the bill, similar to an Ordinary Bill.
In case of a disagreement, the President can summon a joint sitting of both Houses to resolve the deadlock.

5. Presidential Assent:
 2

●​ Money Bill: The President can either give assent or withhold assent, but cannot return it for reconsideration (as
it's introduced with his prior recommendation).
●​ Financial Bill (Category I & II): The President can either give assent, withhold assent, or return it for
reconsideration by the Houses.

6. Speaker's Certification:

●​ Money Bill: The Speaker of the Lok Sabha certifies whether a bill is a Money Bill, and this certification is final and
cannot be challenged in any court.
●​ Financial Bill: No such certification by the Speaker is required.

Procedure for Introduction and Passage

The general procedure for passing a bill in the Indian Parliament involves several stages, but Money Bills and Financial Bills
have specific variations.

Procedure for Introduction and Passage of a Money Bill:

1.​ Introduction in Lok Sabha:​

○​ A Money Bill can only be introduced in the Lok Sabha.

○​ It requires the prior recommendation of the President for its introduction.
○​ It is always a Government Bill, meaning it can only be introduced by a Minister.
2.​ First Reading (Introduction):​

○​ The Minister in charge seeks leave of the House to introduce the bill.
○​ If leave is granted, the bill is introduced, and its title and objective are read out. The bill is then published in
the Gazette of India.
3.​ Second Reading (Consideration):​

○​ Stage 1 (General Discussion): Members discuss the general principles and provisions of the bill.
○​ Stage 2 (Clause-by-Clause Consideration): The bill is taken up clause by clause. Amendments can be
moved and voted upon.
○​ A Money Bill cannot be referred to a Joint Committee of both Houses.
4.​ Third Reading (Passing):​

○​ The Minister moves a motion that the bill be passed.

○​ Debate is confined to the acceptance or rejection of the bill as a whole. No amendments are allowed at this
stage.
○​ The bill is passed by a simple majority of the members present and voting.
5.​ Transmission to Rajya Sabha:​

○​ After the Lok Sabha passes the Money Bill, it is transmitted to the Rajya Sabha for its recommendations.
○​ The Speaker of the Lok Sabha endorses the bill with a certificate stating that it is a Money Bill.
6.​ Rajya Sabha's Role:​

○​ The Rajya Sabha must return the bill to the Lok Sabha with or without recommendations within a period of
14 days from the date of its receipt.
○​ If the Rajya Sabha does not return the bill within 14 days, it is deemed to have been passed by both
Houses in the form in which it was passed by the Lok Sabha.
○​ The Lok Sabha may accept or reject all or any of the recommendations made by the Rajya Sabha.
○​ If the Lok Sabha accepts any recommendations, the bill is deemed to have been passed by both Houses in
the modified form.
○​ If the Lok Sabha rejects all recommendations, the bill is deemed to have been passed by both Houses in
the form originally passed by the Lok Sabha.
7.​ Presidential Assent:​

○​ Once the bill is deemed to have been passed by both Houses, it is presented to the President for assent.
○​ The President cannot return a Money Bill for reconsideration. He must either give his assent or
withhold his assent. In practice, as it's introduced with his prior recommendation, assent is almost always
given.

Procedure for Introduction and Passage of a Financial Bill:

 3

The procedure for a Financial Bill differs based on its category.

Procedure for Financial Bill (Category I) [Article 117(1)]:

1.​ Introduction in Lok Sabha:​

○​ Can only be introduced in the Lok Sabha.

○​ Requires the prior recommendation of the President for its introduction.
○​ Can be introduced by either a Minister (Government Bill) or a private member (Private Member's Bill).
2.​ First Reading (Introduction): (Same as Money Bill/Ordinary Bill)​

○​ Motion for leave to introduce, introduction, and publication in Gazette.

3.​ Second Reading (Consideration): (Same as Ordinary Bill)​

○​ General Discussion: Discussion on principles and provisions.

○​ Committee Stage: Can be referred to a Select Committee of the House or a Joint Committee of both
Houses for detailed examination.
○​ Clause-by-Clause Consideration: Detailed discussion and voting on clauses and amendments.
4.​ Third Reading (Passing): (Same as Ordinary Bill)​

○​ Motion for passing the bill as a whole.

5.​ Transmission to Rajya Sabha:​

○​ After passing the Lok Sabha, it is transmitted to the Rajya Sabha.

6.​ Rajya Sabha's Role:​

○​ The Rajya Sabha has full powers to reject or amend the bill.
○​ If the Rajya Sabha rejects the bill or makes amendments that are not acceptable to the Lok Sabha, a
deadlock arises.
○​ In case of a deadlock, the President can summon a joint sitting of both Houses to resolve the
disagreement. The bill is then passed by a simple majority of the total number of members of both Houses
present and voting.
7.​ Presidential Assent:​

○​ After being passed by both Houses (or a joint sitting), it is presented to the President.
○​ The President can give assent, withhold assent, or return it for reconsideration.

Procedure for Financial Bill (Category II) [Article 117(3)]:

1.​ Introduction in Either House:​

○​ Can be introduced in either the Lok Sabha or the Rajya Sabha.

○​ No prior recommendation of the President is required for its introduction.
○​ Can be introduced by either a Minister or a private member.
2.​ First Reading (Introduction): (Same as Ordinary Bill)​

3.​ Second Reading (Consideration):​

○​ Before either House can pass the bill, it requires the recommendation of the President for its
consideration. This is the key difference from an Ordinary Bill, where presidential recommendation isn't
needed for consideration.
○​ General Discussion, Committee Stage, Clause-by-Clause Consideration: (Same as Ordinary Bill)
4.​ Third Reading (Passing): (Same as Ordinary Bill)​

5.​ Transmission to Other House:​

○​ If introduced in Lok Sabha, transmitted to Rajya Sabha after passing, and vice-versa.
6.​ Role of the Other House:​

○​ The other House has full powers to reject or amend the bill.
○​ In case of a deadlock, the President can summon a joint sitting of both Houses.
7.​ Presidential Assent:​

○​ After being passed by both Houses (or a joint sitting), it is presented to the President.
○​ The President can give assent, withhold assent, or return it for reconsideration.
 4

What are the disqualifications for being Chosen and for Continuing as a Member of Parliament? Discuss with the help
of case Law.

In India, the disqualifications for being chosen as a Member of Parliament (MP) and for continuing as an MP are primarily laid
down in the Constitution of India (Article 102) and the Representation of the People Act, 1951 (RPA, 1951). Additionally,
the Tenth Schedule of the Constitution (Anti-defection Law) provides another set of disqualifications.

It's important to note that a person must satisfy the qualifications to be chosen as an MP (Article 84 of the Constitution) and
must not be subject to any disqualification to be chosen or to continue as an MP.

Disqualifications for Being Chosen as, and for Continuing as, a Member of Parliament

The grounds for disqualification largely overlap for both stages.

I. Under Article 102 of the Constitution of India:

Article 102(1) lists the following disqualifications:

●​ a) Office of Profit: If a person holds any office of profit under the Government of India or the Government of any
State, other than an office declared by Parliament by law not to disqualify its holder.​

○​ Case Law: Jaya Bachchan v. Union of India (2006): The Supreme Court disqualified Rajya Sabha MP
Jaya Bachchan for holding the post of chairperson of the Uttar Pradesh Film Development Council, which
was held to be an "office of profit" as it carried pecuniary benefits. This case highlighted the strict
interpretation of "office of profit" and the need for Parliament to explicitly declare certain offices as exempt.
○​ Case Law: S.P. Gupta v. President of India (1981): While not directly related to MP disqualification, this
case from the context of judicial appointments extensively discussed the concept of "office of profit" and
emphasized that it refers to an office capable of yielding a profit or pecuniary gain, regardless of whether
the holder actually receives such gain.
●​ b) Unsound Mind: If he is of unsound mind and stands so declared by a competent court.​

●​ c) Undischarged Insolvent: If he is an undischarged insolvent (a person who cannot repay his debts and has not
been relieved of them by legal process).​

●​ d) Not a Citizen of India/Foreign Allegiance: If he is not a citizen of India, or has voluntarily acquired the citizenship
of a foreign State, or is under any acknowledgment of allegiance or adherence to a foreign State.​

●​ e) Disqualified by any Law made by Parliament: This is a residuary clause, empowering Parliament to make laws
prescribing further disqualifications. The primary law enacted under this provision is the Representation of the People
Act, [Link] 102(2) states
●​ f) Disqualification under the Tenth Schedule (Anti-defection Law): A person shall be disqualified for being a
member of either House of Parliament if he is so disqualified under the Tenth Schedule.

II. Under the Representation of the People Act, 1951 (RPA, 1951):

The RPA, 1951, enumerates several specific grounds for disqualification, primarily found in Sections 8, 8A, 9, 9A, 10, and 10A.

●​ a) Conviction for Certain Offences (Section 8):​

○​ Section 8(1): Disqualification for conviction for specific serious offences (e.g., promoting enmity, bribery,
rape, cruelty to women, etc.) for a period of six years from the date of conviction (or from release if
imprisoned).
○​ Section 8(2): Disqualification for conviction for certain offences like hoarding, profiteering, food/drug
adulteration, or dowry prohibition, if sentenced to imprisonment for not less than six months. The
disqualification is for six years from the date of conviction.
○​ Section 8(3): Disqualification for conviction for any other offence and sentenced to imprisonment for not
less than two years. The disqualification lasts for the period of imprisonment plus a further six years from
the date of release.
○​ Case Law: Lily Thomas v. Union of India (2013): This landmark Supreme Court judgment struck down
Section 8(4) of the RPA, 1951, which allowed a sitting MP or MLA to continue as a member even after
conviction if an appeal was filed within three months. The Court declared Section 8(4) as unconstitutional,
 5

holding that disqualification of a legislator on conviction for an offence specified in Section 8 of the RPA,
1951, would take effect immediately upon conviction, irrespective of any appeal. This judgment
emphasized immediate accountability.
○​ Impact of Lily Thomas: Following this judgment, several prominent politicians lost their parliamentary
seats immediately after their conviction. For example, Rahul Gandhi's disqualification as an MP in 2023
after his conviction in a defamation case (and later reinstatement after the Supreme Court stayed his
conviction) is a direct illustration of the effect of the Lily Thomas judgment.
●​ b) Corrupt Practices (Section 8A): Disqualification for six years from the date of conviction by a court or order by
the Election Commission for engaging in corrupt practices in elections.​

●​ c) Dismissal for Corruption or Disloyalty (Section 9): Disqualification if dismissed from government service for
corruption or disloyalty to the State, for five years from the date of dismissal.​

●​ d) Government Contracts (Section 9A): Disqualification if a person has any subsisting contract with the appropriate
government for goods, services, or execution of works. This is to prevent conflict of interest.​

●​ e) Disqualification for Offices in Government Companies (Section 10): Disqualification if a person is a managing
agent, manager, or secretary of any company or corporation where the government holds at least 25% of the shares.​

●​ f) Failure to Lodge Election Expenses Account (Section 10A): Disqualification for three years if a candidate fails
to lodge an account of his election expenses within the prescribed time and manner, without any good reason.​

III. Under the Tenth Schedule (Anti-defection Law):

The Tenth Schedule, introduced by the 52nd Amendment Act of 1985, aims to prevent political defections. An MP can be
disqualified if:

●​ a) Voluntarily gives up membership of the political party: If an elected member of a political party voluntarily
gives up his membership of such political party.​

○​ Case Law: Ravi S. Naik v. Union of India (1994): The Supreme Court held that "voluntarily giving up
membership" does not necessarily mean formal resignation. It can be inferred from the conduct of the
member, such as publicly acting against the party's interests or joining another party.
●​ b) Votes/Abstains Contrary to Party Direction: If he votes or abstains from voting in such House contrary to any
direction issued by the political party to which he belongs, without obtaining prior permission of such political party.​

○​ Case Law: Kihoto Hollohan v. Zachillhu (1992): This landmark judgment upheld the constitutional
validity of the Tenth Schedule but clarified that the decision of the Speaker/Chairman on disqualification
under the Tenth Schedule is subject to judicial review, though on limited grounds (e.g., perversity, mala
fide). It established that the Speaker/Chairman acts as a tribunal in such matters.
●​ c) Independently Elected Member Joins a Party: If any independently elected member joins any political party
after such election.​

●​ d) Nominated Member Joins a Party after Six Months: If any nominated member joins any political party after the
expiry of six months from the date on which he takes his seat in the House.​

Authority to Decide Disqualification:

●​ For disqualifications under Article 102 (except defection), the question is referred to the President of India, who
makes the decision after obtaining the opinion of the Election Commission of India (ECI). The President's decision
is final.
●​ For disqualifications under the Tenth Schedule (defection), the decision rests with the Chairman of the Rajya
Sabha or the Speaker of the Lok Sabha, as the case may be. As established in Kihoto Hollohan, their decision is
subject to judicial review.

Write a comprehensive note on the Legislative relations between Union and States.

Legislative Relations between the Union and the States

 6

📜 Constitutional Basis
The legislative relations between the Union and the States in India are primarily governed by Articles 245 to 255 of the
Constitution, along with the Seventh Schedule. These provisions define how legislative powers are distributed and exercised
between the Centre and the States, forming the foundation of Indian federalism.

📘 1. Distribution of Legislative Powers (Articles 245–246)

The Constitution provides for a threefold distribution of legislative subjects between the Union and the States through the
Seventh Schedule, which includes:

Union List (List I)​

This list includes subjects on which only Parliament can legislate. It consists of 100 subjects including defence, foreign affairs,
atomic energy, and banking.

State List (List II)​

This list includes subjects on which only State Legislatures can legislate. It currently has 61 subjects such as police, public
health, local government, and agriculture.

Concurrent List (List III)​

Both Parliament and State Legislatures can legislate on subjects in this list. It contains 52 subjects like education, marriage
and divorce, forests, and criminal law.​
If there is a conflict between Union and State law on a concurrent subject, the Union law prevails (Article 254), unless the State
law has received Presidential assent.

📘 2. Power of Parliament to Legislate on State Subjects

In specific circumstances, Parliament is empowered to legislate on matters in the State List:

a. In National Interest (Article 249)​

If the Rajya Sabha passes a resolution by a two-thirds majority stating that it is necessary in the national interest, Parliament
can legislate on a State subject. This power is valid for one year and can be extended.

b. During a National Emergency (Article 250)​

While a proclamation of national emergency is in force, Parliament can make laws on any matter in the State List. These laws
cease to operate six months after the emergency ends.

c. When States Make a Request (Article 252)​

If two or more State Legislatures pass resolutions requesting Parliament to legislate on a State subject, Parliament may do so.
Such a law applies only to those states, though others may adopt it later.

d. For Implementation of International Agreements (Article 253)​

Parliament can legislate on any subject, including those in the State List, to implement treaties, international agreements, or
conventions.

📘 3. Residuary Powers (Article 248)

Subjects not mentioned in any of the three lists fall under residuary powers, which are vested in Parliament. This allows the
Centre to legislate on emerging or unforeseen areas like cyber laws, artificial intelligence, and space exploration.

📘 4. Centre’s Control Over State Legislation

Governor’s Powers​
A bill passed by a State Legislature can be reserved by the Governor for the consideration of the President (Article 200).

President’s Assent​
The President can give assent, withhold assent, or return the bill for reconsideration (except money bills).

Doctrine of Repugnancy (Article 254)​

If a State law conflicts with a Central law on a Concurrent List subject, the Central law prevails. However, if the State law has
received Presidential assent, it can override the Central law in that state.
 7

⚖️ Key Case Laws

State of West Bengal v. Union of India (1963)​
The Supreme Court held that the Indian Constitution has strong unitary features and allows the Union broad legislative powers
when required.

Hoechst Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. State of Bihar (1983)​

This case affirmed that residuary powers belong exclusively to Parliament and should not be interpreted narrowly.

Raja Ram Pal v. Lok Sabha Speaker (2007)​

The Court held that Parliament has the power to expel its own members for misconduct under its privileges, though such
expulsion is separate from constitutional disqualification.

Write a detailed note on the State Liability as provided in Article 299 and 300 of the Constitution of India.

The liability of the Union and State governments in India, both in contract and in tort, is a crucial aspect of constitutional law.
Articles 299 and 300 of the Constitution of India deal with this subject, laying down the procedural and substantive framework
for how the government can enter into contracts and how it can sue or be sued.

Article 299: Contracts

Article 299 primarily deals with the contractual liability of the Union and State governments. It sets out the essential
formalities that must be complied with for a contract made by the government to be valid and binding. This article is vital for
safeguarding public funds and ensuring transparency and accountability in government dealings.

Key provisions of Article 299:

●​ Article 299(1): Form and Execution of Contracts

○​ "All contracts made in the exercise of the executive power of the Union or of a State shall be expressed to
be made by the President, or by the Governor of the State, as the case may be, and all such contracts and
all assurances of property made in the exercise of that power shall be executed on behalf of the President
or the Governor by such persons and in such manner as he may direct or authorise."
○​ Mandatory Requirements: This clause lays down three critical conditions for a valid government contract:
1.​ Expression: The contract must be expressly made in the name of the President (for the Union)
or the Governor (for the State). This means it must be clear on the face of the document that the
contract is entered into by the head of the executive.
2.​ Execution: The contract must be executed on behalf of the President or the Governor. This
implies that the actual signing and formal completion of the contract must be done by a person
duly authorized.
3.​ Authorization: The execution must be by such person and in such manner as the President or
Governor may direct or authorise. This ensures that only designated officials can bind the
government in contractual matters.
○​ Purpose: The primary objective of these formalities is to protect the government against unauthorized or
fraudulent contracts and to provide a clear record of its contractual obligations. It's a public policy
safeguard to prevent misuse of public funds.
○​ Consequence of Non-Compliance: The Supreme Court has consistently held that the provisions of
Article 299(1) are mandatory, not merely directory. Any contract that does not strictly comply with these
conditions is void and unenforceable. There is no question of estoppel or ratification in such cases,
meaning the government cannot be held liable even if it has received a benefit from a contract that fails to
meet these formal requirements. However, in certain circumstances, a party who has rendered services or
supplied goods under a void government contract might be able to claim compensation under Section 70 of
the Indian Contract Act, 1872 (for unjust enrichment) or Section 65 (for benefits received under a void
agreement).
●​ Article 299(2): Personal Non-Liability
○​ "Neither the President nor the Governor shall be personally liable in respect of any contract or assurance
made or executed for the purposes of this Constitution, or for the purposes of any enactment relating to the
Government of India heretofore in force, nor shall any person making or executing any such contract or
assurance on behalf of any of them be personally liable in respect thereof."
○​ Protection for President/Governor and Officials: This clause grants immunity from personal liability to
the President, Governors, and the officials who execute contracts on their behalf. This is because they are
acting as agents of the Union or State government, and the liability rests with the government as a legal
entity, not with the individuals holding office or performing their duties. This prevents officials from being
discouraged from performing their duties due to fear of personal lawsuits.
 8

Relationship with Indian Contract Act: While Article 299 lays down specific formalities for government contracts, these
contracts are still generally governed by the principles of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, such as offer, acceptance,
consideration, free consent, etc. Article 299 adds an additional layer of constitutional requirements.

Article 300: Suits and Proceedings

Article 300 deals with the capacity of the Union and State governments to sue and be sued, and the extent of their liability,
particularly in tort (civil wrongs). It clarifies the legal personality of the government in legal proceedings.

Key provisions of Article 300:

●​ Article 300(1): Right to Sue and Be Sued

○​ "The Government of India may sue or be sued by the name of the Union of India and the Government of a
State may sue or be sued by the name of the State and may, subject to any provisions which may be made
by Act of Parliament or of the Legislature of such State enacted by virtue of powers conferred by this
Constitution, sue or be sued in relation to their respective affairs in the like cases as the Dominion of India
and the corresponding Provinces or the corresponding Indian States might have sued or been sued if this
Constitution had not been enacted."
○​ Legal Persona: This clause establishes that the Government of India and the Government of a State are
legal entities that can sue and be sued in their respective names (e.g., "Union of India" or "State of
Haryana"). This provides a clear legal identity for governmental litigation.
○​ Extent of Liability (Reference to Pre-Constitution Era): The crucial part of this clause is the phrase "in
the like cases as the Dominion of India and the corresponding Provinces or the corresponding Indian
States might have sued or been sued if this Constitution had not been enacted." This means that the extent
of the government's liability, particularly in tort, is traced back to the legal position that existed before the
commencement of the Constitution, specifically under:
■​ Government of India Act, 1858 (Section 65): This Act made the Secretary of State in Council
liable to be sued in India and England in the same cases as the East India Company could have
been sued.
■​ Government of India Act, 1915 (Section 32): Replicated the position of the 1858 Act.
■​ Government of India Act, 1935 (Section 176): Continued the same principle.
○​ Historical Legacy: Sovereign vs. Non-Sovereign Functions (Tortious Liability): Due to this historical
linkage, the Indian courts initially adopted the English common law doctrine of "sovereign immunity" which
distinguished between sovereign and non-sovereign functions of the State for determining tortious liability.
■​ Sovereign Functions: Activities that are inherently governmental and cannot be performed by
private individuals (e.g., maintaining law and order, administering justice, defense, revenue
collection). The State was generally immune from liability for torts committed by its servants
while performing sovereign functions.
■​ Non-Sovereign (or Commercial/Trading) Functions: Activities that could also be performed by
private individuals (e.g., running railways, factories, commercial enterprises). For torts committed
in the course of non-sovereign functions, the State could be held liable, similar to a private
individual.
○​ Landmark Cases and Evolution:
■​ P. & O. Steam Navigation Company v. Secretary of State for India (1861): This seminal case
established the distinction between sovereign and non-sovereign functions for state liability in
tort.
■​ Kasturi Lal Ralia Ram Jain v. State of U.P. (1965): The Supreme Court, while recognizing the
distinction, expressed dissatisfaction with it. It upheld sovereign immunity for acts done in the
exercise of sovereign powers, even if they were negligent.
■​ Post-Kasturi Lal developments: Over time, the judiciary, recognizing the welfare state concept
and the need for accountability, has progressively narrowed the scope of sovereign immunity.
■​ State of Rajasthan v. Smt. Vidyawati (1962): The Supreme Court held the State
liable for the tortious act of its employee while driving an official jeep, as it was a
non-sovereign function.
■​ N. Nagendra Rao & Co. v. State of A.P. (1994): The Supreme Court severely
curtailed the doctrine of sovereign immunity, stating that the "doctrine of sovereign
immunity has no relevance in the modern era." It held that the State is liable for the
tortious acts of its employees unless it can show that the act was in the exercise of
truly sovereign functions or protected by a statute.
■​ Modern Trend: The trend is towards making the State liable for torts committed by its
employees, especially in cases of negligence, unless the act is directly traceable to the
exercise of purely sovereign functions and no private citizen could perform such
functions. The focus has shifted from who performed the act to the nature of the
function.
●​ Article 300(2): Continuity of Pending Proceedings
 9

○​ This clause ensures the continuity of legal proceedings that were pending against the Dominion of India,
Provinces, or Indian States before the commencement of the Constitution. The Union of India or the
corresponding State would be substituted as the party in those proceedings.

Significance of Articles 299 and 300:

●​ Accountability: These articles, particularly with judicial interpretations, ensure that the government, like any other
legal entity, is subject to the rule of law and can be held accountable for its actions, both in contracts and torts.
●​ Protection of Public Funds: Article 299's strict formalities prevent unauthorized or fraudulent contracts,
safeguarding public money.
●​ Citizen's Redressal: Article 300 provides a mechanism for citizens to seek redress against the government for
wrongs committed against them, reinforcing the principle of justice and fairness in a democratic state.
●​ Checks and Balances: They act as a check on executive power, ensuring that government actions are within legal
bounds and that officials act responsibly.

Explain the theory of 'Basic Structure'. Does it restrict the power of Parliament to amend the Constitution? Discuss
with the help of suitable case law.

The Theory of Basic Structure is a unique and fundamental concept in Indian constitutional law that acts as a check on the
Parliament's power to amend the Constitution. While the Constitution grants Parliament the power to amend its provisions
under Article 368, the Basic Structure Doctrine posits that this power is not absolute and cannot be used to alter, abrogate, or
destroy the fundamental features or the essential identity of the Constitution.

Evolution of the Basic Structure Theory

The term "Basic Structure" is not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution. It is a judicial innovation that evolved through a
series of landmark judgments of the Supreme Court of India.

1.​ Early Years: Unlimited Amending Power?

○​ Shankari Prasad v. Union of India (1951): The Supreme Court, in this case, held that the Parliament's
power to amend the Constitution under Article 368 also extended to the Fundamental Rights (Part III) and
that 'law' under Article 13 (which states that any law inconsistent with fundamental rights shall be void) only
referred to ordinary laws, not constitutional amendments. This essentially implied Parliament had an
unfettered power to amend the Constitution.
○​ Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan (1965): The Supreme Court reiterated its stand from Shankari Prasad,
upholding Parliament's power to amend fundamental rights. However, Justice Mudholkar, in his dissenting
opinion, for the first time, hinted at the idea that the Constitution might have certain "basic features" that
cannot be changed.
2.​ The Turning Point: Golaknath's Challenge
○​ Golaknath v. State of Punjab (1967): In a significant reversal, the Supreme Court, by a 6:5 majority, held
that Fundamental Rights were "transcendental and inalienable" and could not be amended by Parliament.
It stated that an amendment under Article 368 was also a "law" within the meaning of Article 13 and thus
subject to judicial review. This created a direct confrontation between the judiciary and Parliament.
3.​ Parliament's Response and the Landmark Case: Kesavananda Bharati
○​ To overcome the Golaknath judgment, Parliament enacted the 24th Constitutional Amendment Act,
1971, which explicitly stated that Parliament has the power to amend any part of the Constitution, including
Fundamental Rights, and that such an amendment would not be considered "law" under Article 13.
○​ This amendment, along with others, was challenged in the monumental case of Kesavananda Bharati v.
State of Kerala (1973). This case involved a 13-judge bench, the largest in India's judicial history.

The Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973) Judgment:

This case is the cornerstone of the Basic Structure Doctrine. The Supreme Court, by a narrow majority of 7:6, held:

●​ Parliament's amending power is not unlimited: The Court reversed the Golaknath judgment, affirming that
Parliament does have the power to amend any part of the Constitution, including Fundamental Rights (thus upholding
the 24th Amendment).
●​ Implied Limitations: However, it simultaneously held that this power is not absolute and is subject to "implied
limitations." Parliament cannot alter, abrogate, or destroy the "basic structure" or "framework" of the Constitution.
●​ Power to Amend is not Power to Destroy: The Court famously stated, "The power to amend is not a power to
destroy." Parliament can amend, but it cannot rewrite the Constitution to the extent of changing its fundamental
identity.
 10

●​ No exhaustive list: The Court did not provide an exhaustive list of what constitutes the "basic structure." Instead, it
left it to future courts to determine, on a case-by-case basis, what elements form part of this basic structure.
However, it did suggest some elements, such as:
○​ Supremacy of the Constitution
○​ Republican and Democratic form of Government
○​ Secular character of the Constitution
○​ Separation of Powers
○​ Federal character of the Constitution
○​ Unity and integrity of the Nation
○​ Sovereignty of India
○​ Judicial Review
○​ Harmony and balance between Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles

Does it Restrict the Power of Parliament to Amend the Constitution?

Yes, definitively. The Basic Structure Doctrine acts as a significant restriction on the Parliament's power to amend the
Constitution.

Before Kesavananda Bharati, there was a perception (especially after Shankari Prasad and Sajjan Singh) that Parliament had
virtually unlimited power to amend the Constitution. Golaknath tried to restrict this power by saying Fundamental Rights could
not be amended at all. The Basic Structure Doctrine provided a nuanced solution: Parliament can amend Fundamental Rights
and other parts of the Constitution, but it cannot do so in a way that damages or destroys the core identity or the foundational
principles of the Constitution.

This means Parliament cannot:

●​ Abolish democracy and establish a totalitarian regime.

●​ Dismantle the federal structure and make India a completely unitary state.
●​ Eliminate judicial review, thereby making legislative actions immune from constitutional scrutiny.
●​ Remove the secular character of the state.

The judiciary, particularly the Supreme Court, acts as the guardian of the Constitution and has the power to review
constitutional amendments to ensure they adhere to the Basic Structure. If an amendment is found to violate the basic
structure, it can be declared null and void.

Suitable Case Law Further Discussing Basic Structure:

1.​ Indira Gandhi v. Raj Narain (1975) - The Election Case:

○​ Background: After the Allahabad High Court invalidated Prime Minister Indira Gandhi's election,
Parliament passed the 39th Constitutional Amendment Act, 1975. This amendment, among other things,
inserted Article 329A, which placed the election of the Prime Minister and other high officials beyond the
scrutiny of any court, vesting this power in a parliamentary committee.
○​ Judgment: The Supreme Court, applying the Basic Structure Doctrine, struck down clause (4) of Article
329A. Justice H.R. Khanna famously declared that free and fair elections and the rule of law are
essential components of the basic structure of the Constitution. The amendment was seen as an attempt to
remove the very mechanism of judicial review over elections, which is fundamental to democracy. This
case reaffirmed the doctrine immediately after its inception in Kesavananda Bharati.
2.​ Minerva Mills Ltd. v. Union of India (1980):
○​ Background: During the Emergency period, the 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1976 (often called
the "Mini-Constitution" due to its extensive changes) was passed. Among its provisions, Sections 4 and 55
were particularly contentious. Section 4 amended Article 31C, giving precedence to all Directive Principles
of State Policy (DPSPs) over Fundamental Rights (Articles 14, 19, and 21). Section 55 stated that there
would be no limitation on Parliament's power to amend the Constitution.
○​ Judgment: The Supreme Court struck down Sections 4 and 55 of the 42nd Amendment, reiterating and
strengthening the Basic Structure Doctrine.
■​ It held that the limited power of Parliament to amend the Constitution is itself a basic feature
of the Constitution. Parliament cannot convert its limited amending power into an absolute one.
■​ It also reinforced that the harmony and balance between Fundamental Rights and Directive
Principles is an essential feature of the basic structure. Giving absolute primacy to DPSPs over
FRs would upset this delicate balance.
■​ The Court emphatically stated that judicial review is a basic feature and cannot be excluded.
3.​ Waman Rao v. Union of India (1981):
 11

○​ This case affirmed that the Basic Structure Doctrine would apply to all constitutional amendments made
after April 24, 1973 (the date of the Kesavananda Bharati judgment). It provided clarity on the
retrospective application of the doctrine.
4.​ S.R. Bommai v. Union of India (1994):
○​ While not directly about an amendment, this case significantly expanded the scope of the basic structure
by holding that federalism, secularism, democracy, and unity and integrity of the nation are basic
features of the Constitution. The Court used the basic structure doctrine to curb the arbitrary dismissal of
state governments under Article 356.
5.​ I.R. Coelho v. State of Tamil Nadu (2007):
○​ This judgment reaffirmed that all laws placed in the Ninth Schedule (which generally aimed to immunize
laws from judicial review on grounds of violating Fundamental Rights) after April 24, 1973, would be subject
to judicial review on the ground of violating the basic structure of the Constitution. This solidified the
supremacy of the basic structure doctrine over the Ninth Schedule's protective umbrella.

How National Emergency is different from State Emergency? Discuss the consequences of Proclamation of National
Emergency.

India's Constitution provides for three types of emergencies: National Emergency (Article 352), State Emergency (President's
Rule under Article 356 and 365), and Financial Emergency (Article 360). While all involve the concentration of power in the
Union executive, National Emergency and State Emergency differ significantly in their grounds, scope, and consequences.

National Emergency (Article 352) vs. State Emergency (President's Rule - Article 356/365)

Here's a detailed comparison:

Feature National Emergency (Article 352) State Emergency (President's Rule - Article
356/365)

Grounds War, External Aggression, or Armed Failure of Constitutional Machinery in a State. This
Rebellion (Originally "internal disturbance," can be: <br> 1. If the President, on receipt of a
changed to "armed rebellion" by 44th report from the Governor or otherwise, is satisfied that
Amendment Act, 1978). a situation has arisen in which the government of a
State cannot be carried on in accordance with the
provisions of the Constitution (Art. 356). <br> 2. If a
State fails to comply with or give effect to any
directions given by the Union (Art. 365).

Area of Operation Can be declared for the whole of India or Applies only to the concerned State where the
any part of its territory. constitutional machinery has failed.

Proclamation President, on the written President, generally based on the report of the State
Authority recommendation of the Union Cabinet. Governor, but can also be "otherwise" (on his own
(44th Amendment made this mandatory to satisfaction).
prevent misuse).

Approval Required Proclamation must be approved by both Proclamation must be approved by both Houses of
Houses of Parliament by a special Parliament by a simple majority within two months.
majority within one month.
 12

Duration Once approved, it continues for six Initially for six months. Can be extended for a
months. Can be extended for an indefinite maximum period of three years, with parliamentary
period with parliamentary approval every approval every six months. Beyond one year,
six months. extension is possible only if a National Emergency is
in operation in the whole or part of India, or if the
Election Commission certifies that elections cannot be
held.

Revocation Can be revoked by the President at any Can be revoked by the President at any time. No
time. Requires only a simple majority parliamentary approval is required for revocation.
resolution by the Lok Sabha to revoke it.

Impact on Transforms the federal structure into a The State Executive is dismissed, and its powers
Centre-State unitary one. The Centre gets executive are exercised by the Centre (through the Governor).
Relations and legislative control over the entire The State Legislature is either suspended or
country or the affected region. State dissolved, and its legislative powers are exercised by
governments are not suspended but come Parliament.
under the complete control of the Centre.

Impact on Article 19 rights are automatically Does not directly affect the Fundamental Rights of
Fundamental suspended if the emergency is declared on citizens in the State.
Rights grounds of war or external aggression (Art.
358). Suspension of other Fundamental
Rights (except Articles 20 and 21)
requires a separate Presidential order (Art.
359).

Export to Sheets

Consequences of Proclamation of National Emergency

A proclamation of National Emergency has profound and wide-ranging consequences, altering the normal functioning of the
Indian polity. These consequences can be examined under various heads:

1.​ Executive Consequences (Article 353):

○​ Extension of Centre's Executive Power: The executive power of the Union extends to giving directions to
any State on "any matter." This means the State governments, while not suspended, come under the
complete control of the Centre. They have to comply with the directions of the Union executive.
○​ This transforms the federal character of the government into a unitary one, with the Centre gaining
overwhelming control over the States.
2.​ Legislative Consequences (Articles 250, 353):
○​ Parliament's Power to Legislate on State List: While a proclamation of National Emergency is in
operation, Parliament acquires the power to make laws on any subject enumerated in the State List. This
means Parliament can legislate on matters that are ordinarily exclusively within the domain of the State
Legislatures.
 13

○​ State Legislature's Power not Suspended: The power of a State Legislature to make laws on subjects in
the State List is not suspended. However, if there is a conflict between a State law and a Parliamentary law
on a State List subject during the emergency, the Parliamentary law prevails.
○​ Ordinance Making Power: If Parliament is not in session, the President can issue ordinances on State
List subjects as well.
○​ Expiry of Laws: Any law made by Parliament on a State List subject during the emergency becomes
inoperative six months after the emergency ceases to operate.
3.​ Financial Consequences (Article 354):
○​ Modification of Revenue Distribution: The President can issue orders to modify the provisions regarding
the distribution of revenues between the Union and the States. This means the Centre can reallocate
financial resources, potentially reducing transfers to states to meet its emergency needs.
○​ Every such order of the President has to be laid before both Houses of Parliament for approval.
○​ These modifications continue till the end of the financial year in which the Emergency ceases to operate.
4.​ Impact on the Life of Lok Sabha and State Assembly (Article 83, 172):
○​ Extension of Lok Sabha's Term: The normal life of the Lok Sabha (5 years) can be extended by a law of
Parliament for one year at a time, for any length of time. However, this extension cannot continue beyond a
period of six months after the emergency has ceased to operate.
○​ Extension of State Assembly's Term: Similarly, the normal term of a State Legislative Assembly can also
be extended by Parliament for one year at a time. This extension also cannot continue beyond a period of
six months after the emergency has ceased to operate.
5.​ Impact on Fundamental Rights (Articles 358, 359):
○​ Suspension of Article 19 Rights (Article 358): When a National Emergency is declared on the grounds
of war or external aggression, the six rights guaranteed by Article 19 (freedom of speech, assembly,
association, movement, residence, and profession) are automatically suspended. No separate order is
required for their suspension. However, if the emergency is declared on the ground of armed rebellion,
Article 19 rights are not automatically suspended.
○​ Suspension of Other Fundamental Rights (Article 359): The President can, by order, suspend the right
to move any court for the enforcement of other Fundamental Rights (except for the rights guaranteed by
Articles 20 and 21 - protection in respect of conviction for offences and protection of life and personal
liberty, respectively). This suspension order can be for the whole of India or any part, and for the entire
period of emergency or a shorter period.
○​ The 44th Amendment Act, 1978, crucially stipulated that Articles 20 and 21 can never be suspended
during a National Emergency, even by a Presidential order. This was a direct response to the excesses of
the 1975 Emergency where even the right to life and personal liberty was challenged in courts.
6.​ Public Order and Civil Liberties:
○​ Historically, during National Emergencies (especially the 1975 internal emergency), there have been
significant curbs on civil liberties, including preventive detentions, censorship of the press, and restrictions
on political activities. While the 44th Amendment sought to safeguard against such abuses, the potential for
curtailment of freedoms remains.

Explain the Doctrine of Pleasure. How application of the Doctrine is limited and restricted under Article 311 of the
Constitution?

The Doctrine of Pleasure is a concept in constitutional law, particularly prevalent in countries with a Westminster system of
government (like India, UK, Canada, Australia). It signifies that a civil servant holds office not by right, but during the "pleasure"
of the head of the executive (the Crown in the UK, the President in India, or the Governor at the State level). This doctrine is
enshrined in Article 310(1) of the Indian Constitution.

Explanation of the Doctrine of Pleasure

Article 310(1) states: "Except as expressly provided by this Constitution, every person who is a member of the defence service
or of a civil service of the Union or of an all-India service or holds any post connected with defence or any civil post under the
Union, shall hold office during the pleasure of the President, and every person who is a member of a civil service of a State or
holds any civil post under a State shall hold office during the pleasure of the Governor of the State."

Key aspects of the doctrine:

Origin: The doctrine has its roots in English common law, where civil servants were regarded as servants of the Crown and
could be dismissed at any time without notice or cause. This was based on the public policy that the Crown should have the
freedom to manage its public service efficiently.
 14

●​ Arbitrary Power (in theory): In its pure form, the doctrine implies an unfettered right of the executive to terminate
the services of a government employee at any time, for any reason, or no reason at all. The employee has no right to
sue for wrongful termination or claim damages.
●​ Public Policy: The rationale behind this doctrine is that public service requires utmost efficiency, loyalty, and
accountability. To ensure this, the executive must have the power to remove inefficient, corrupt, or disloyal employees
without the constraints of ordinary contract law.
●​ Not a Contractual Right: The relationship between the government and its civil servants is considered to be one of
status, not contract. While appointment letters and service rules may exist, the ultimate tenure is subject to the
pleasure of the President or Governor.

How the Application of the Doctrine is Limited and Restricted under Article 311 of the Constitution

While Article 310 enshrines the Doctrine of Pleasure, its application in India is not absolute and is significantly curtailed and
restricted by Article 311 of the Constitution. The framers of the Indian Constitution, recognizing the need for both administrative
efficiency and protection against arbitrary action, adopted a modified version of the British doctrine.

Article 311 provides two crucial safeguards to civil servants against arbitrary dismissal, removal, or reduction in rank:

1.​ Article 311(1): No Dismissal by Subordinate Authority "No person who is a member of a civil service of the Union
or an all-India service or a civil service of a State or holds a civil post under the Union or a State shall be dismissed or
removed by an authority subordinate to that by which he was appointed."
○​ Meaning: This clause ensures that a civil servant cannot be dismissed or removed by an authority lower in
rank than the authority that appointed them. The underlying principle is that the power of dismissal should
be exercised by an authority of at least the same rank as the appointing authority, ensuring a degree of
fairness and preventing arbitrary action by lower-level officials.
○​ Purpose: It prevents malicious or uninformed dismissals by officers who may not have the full context or
authority over the initial appointment.
2.​ Article 311(2): Right to a Reasonable Opportunity of Being Heard "No such person as aforesaid shall be
dismissed or removed or reduced in rank except after an inquiry in which he has been informed of the charges
against him and given a reasonable opportunity of being heard in respect of those charges."
○​ Meaning: This is the most significant safeguard. It mandates that before a civil servant is dismissed,
removed, or reduced in rank, an inquiry must be conducted. During this inquiry, the civil servant must be:
■​ Informed of the charges: They must be clearly told what misconduct or allegations they are
facing.
■​ Given a reasonable opportunity to be heard: This includes the right to present their defense,
cross-examine witnesses, and produce their own evidence. This embodies the principles of
natural justice (audi alteram partem - hear the other side).
○​ Purpose: This clause aims to prevent arbitrary punishment and ensure that no civil servant is penalised
without due process. It provides a shield against political vendetta or capricious executive action.
○​ Exceptions to Article 311(2): The Constitution itself provides for three exceptions to this safeguard, where
no inquiry or opportunity to be heard is required:
■​ (a) Conviction in a Criminal Case: Where a person is dismissed or removed or reduced in rank
on the ground of conduct which has led to his conviction on a criminal charge.
■​ (b) Impracticability: Where the authority empowered to dismiss or remove a person or to
reduce him in rank is satisfied that for some reason, to be recorded by that authority in writing, it
is not reasonably practicable to hold such inquiry. (The Supreme Court has emphasized that the
satisfaction must be genuine and the reasons must be recorded).
■​ (c) Security of State: Where the President or the Governor, as the case may be, is satisfied that
in the interest of the security of the State it is not expedient to hold such inquiry. (This is a grave
power, to be exercised with extreme caution, often invoked in cases of espionage or treason).

Judicial Interpretation and Limits on Doctrine of Pleasure

The Indian judiciary has played a crucial role in interpreting Article 310 and 311, ensuring that the Doctrine of Pleasure is
exercised in a fair and just manner.

●​ State of Bihar v. Abdul Majid (1954): The Supreme Court held that the English common law rule of the Doctrine of
Pleasure has not been adopted in its entirety in India. It affirmed that a civil servant in India can sue the government
for arrears of salary and for wrongful dismissal, unlike in England. This judgment established that the absolute nature
of the doctrine is curtailed in India.
●​ Union of India v. Tulsiram Patel (1985): This landmark case exhaustively dealt with Article 311(2) and its
exceptions. The Supreme Court emphasized that the Doctrine of Pleasure is not arbitrary and must be exercised
subject to the express provisions of the Constitution, particularly Article 311. It clarified the circumstances under
 15

which the exceptions to Article 311(2) can be invoked, stressing that the satisfaction of the authority must be based
on objective facts and not mere caprice.
●​ Khem Chand v. Union of India (1958): This case established the principle of "reasonable opportunity" under Article
311(2), including the right to know the charges, the right to inspect documents, and the right to lead evidence.
●​ Fundamental Rights: The Doctrine of Pleasure is also subject to the Fundamental Rights enshrined in Part III of the
Constitution, particularly Articles 14 (Equality before law), 16 (Equality of opportunity in matters of public
employment), and 21 (Protection of life and personal liberty). Dismissals must not be discriminatory or arbitrary.

Explain in detail the role played by the Election Commission in India.

The Election Commission of India (ECI) is an autonomous constitutional body responsible for administering the entire
process of elections in India. Established on January 25, 1950 (celebrated as National Voters' Day), its primary objective is to
ensure that elections are conducted in a free, fair, and impartial manner, upholding the democratic fabric of the nation. Its
powers are primarily derived from Article 324 of the Indian Constitution, along with the Representation of the People Acts
(1950 and 1951) and various other laws and rules.

Composition and Independence

The ECI consists of a Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) and such number of other Election Commissioners (ECs) as the
President may from time to time fix. Currently, it is a multi-member body comprising one CEC and two ECs.

To ensure its independence and impartiality, the Constitution provides several safeguards:

●​ The CEC and ECs are appointed by the President.

●​ The CEC can only be removed from office in the same manner and on the same grounds as a judge of the Supreme
Court (i.e., through an impeachment process by Parliament).
●​ The service conditions of the CEC cannot be varied to his disadvantage after appointment.
●​ Other Election Commissioners can only be removed from office on the recommendation of the CEC.

Key Roles and Functions of the Election Commission of India

The ECI performs a wide array of functions, encompassing every stage of the electoral process, from preparation to declaration
of results and beyond. These can be broadly categorized as follows:

1.​ Administrative Functions:

○​ Delimitation of Constituencies: The ECI determines the territorial areas of electoral constituencies
throughout the country based on the Delimitation Commission Act of Parliament. This ensures fair
representation and equal voting power.
○​ Preparation and Revision of Electoral Rolls: It prepares and periodically revises electoral rolls (voter
lists) to ensure accuracy and inclusiveness. This involves registering new voters, removing deceased or
ineligible voters, and correcting errors. The issuance of Electors Photo Identity Cards (EPICs) is also part
of this process.
○​ Notification and Scheduling of Elections: The ECI decides the dates and schedules for all elections
(general elections, by-elections) to the Parliament, State Legislative Assemblies, and the offices of the
President and Vice-President. This includes setting dates for filing nominations, scrutiny of nominations,
withdrawal of candidatures, polling dates, and counting dates.
○​ Appointment of Election Machinery: It appoints various officers for election management, including Chief
Electoral Officers (CEOs) at the state level, District Election Officers (DEOs), Returning Officers (ROs),
Electoral Registration Officers (EROs), and Presiding Officers for polling stations. These officers are drawn
from government services and function under the ECI's superintendence.
○​ Arrangement of Polling Stations and Counting Centres: The ECI makes all necessary arrangements
for polling stations, including their location, assignment of voters, and provision of necessary resources
(EVMs, VVPATs, ballot papers, security). It also designates counting centers and oversees the counting
process.
○​ Voter Education and Awareness: The ECI actively engages in voter awareness and education programs
to encourage greater voter participation and inform citizens about their electoral rights and responsibilities.
2.​ Regulatory Functions:
○​ Recognition of Political Parties and Allotment of Symbols: The ECI registers political parties and
grants them recognition as national or state parties based on their electoral performance. It also allots
election symbols to political parties and independent candidates, ensuring that no two parties or candidates
get the same symbol. It acts as a quasi-judicial body to settle disputes related to party recognition and
symbol allocation.
 16

○​ Enforcement of Model Code of Conduct (MCC): The ECI frames and enforces the Model Code of
Conduct, a set of guidelines for the ethical conduct of political parties and candidates during elections. The
MCC aims to ensure a level playing field and prevent misuse of power by the ruling party, inflammatory
speeches, and unfair electoral practices. The ECI takes action against violations, which can range from
warnings to disqualification of candidates.
○​ Setting Limits on Campaign Expenditure: The ECI sets limits on the election expenditure by candidates
and political parties to curb the influence of money power. It also monitors campaign finances and requires
candidates to submit detailed accounts of their expenses within a stipulated time after the results are
declared.
○​ Regulation of Opinion Polls and Exit Polls: It has the power to prohibit the dissemination or publication
of opinion polls and exit polls during specific periods to prevent their undue influence on voters.
3.​ Quasi-Judicial and Advisory Functions:
○​ Dispute Resolution: The ECI acts as a quasi-judicial body to inquire into and resolve disputes arising
during elections, such as complaints of malpractices, booth capturing, rigging, and violence. It has the
power to annul elections in a constituency if it finds evidence of such irregularities.
○​ Disqualification of Members: The ECI advises the President on matters relating to the disqualification of
Members of Parliament (MPs) and the Governor on matters relating to the disqualification of Members of
Legislative Assemblies (MLAs) due to various reasons (e.g., defection, conviction in a criminal case, failure
to lodge election expenses). Its opinion in such matters is binding.
○​ Power to Cancel Elections: In cases of severe irregularities, large-scale rigging, or violence that threaten
the fairness of the election, the ECI has the authority to cancel the poll in a constituency and order a
re-election.
○​ Advisory Role during President's Rule: The ECI advises the President on whether elections can be held
in a state that is under President's Rule, especially if the period of emergency is to be extended beyond
one year.
4.​ Technological Integration and Reforms:
○​ Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs) and Voter Verifiable Paper Audit Trail (VVPATs): The ECI has
progressively introduced EVMs and VVPATs to enhance the efficiency, accuracy, and transparency of the
voting and counting process, reducing the scope for manual errors and fraud.
○​ Online Services: It utilizes various digital platforms, websites, and mobile applications for voter
registration, grievance redressal, information dissemination, and monitoring of election activities.
○​ Electoral Reforms: The ECI continually proposes and implements electoral reforms aimed at improving
the integrity and fairness of elections, such as stricter laws against hate speech, criminalization of politics,
and funding of political parties.

Significance of the Election Commission

The Election Commission of India is often hailed as one of the most robust and independent election management bodies in the
world. Its crucial role ensures:

●​ Free and Fair Elections: It is the backbone of India's democratic system, ensuring that the electoral process is
conducted impartially and without undue influence.
●​ Credibility and Public Trust: Its independent functioning instills confidence among citizens and political parties in
the fairness of election outcomes.
●​ Accountability: By enforcing rules and regulations, it holds political parties and candidates accountable for their
conduct during elections.
●​ Evolution of Electoral Practices: Through its reforms and adoption of technology, it has continuously adapted the
electoral process to meet new challenges and improve efficiency.

1. Powers and Functions of Speaker of the State Legislature

●​ Presiding Officer of the State Legislative Assembly.​

●​ Maintains order and decorum in the House.​

●​ Decides on the admissibility of questions, motions, and resolutions.​

●​ Interprets rules and procedures of the House.​

●​ Casts the deciding vote in case of a tie.​

 17

●​ Decides on matters related to disqualification under the anti-defection law (Tenth Schedule).​

●​ Certifies bills as Money Bills.​

2. Freedom of Speech as a Privilege

●​ Article 194(1) grants members of State Legislatures freedom of speech in the House.​

●​ No action (civil or criminal) can be taken for anything said or voted in the House.​

●​ This privilege is not absolute—subject to rules of procedure and House discipline.​

●​ Cannot be questioned in any court (Article 212).​

3. Freedom from Arrest

●​ Members of Parliament and State Legislatures have immunity from arrest in civil cases:​

○​ During the session​

○​ 40 days before and after the session​

●​ No immunity in criminal cases or under preventive detention.​

●​ Meant to ensure uninterrupted legislative functioning.​

4. Inter-State Council

●​ Established under Article 263.​

●​ A constitutional body for coordination between states and the Union.​

●​ Headed by the Prime Minister.​

●​ Functions:​

○​ Investigates and discusses inter-state disputes​

○​ Recommends policy coordination​

○​ Enhances cooperative federalism​

5. Colourable Legislation

●​ Based on the doctrine: "What cannot be done directly, cannot be done indirectly."​

●​ Refers to laws where the legislature exceeds its jurisdiction by disguising the true purpose of the law.​

●​ The court examines the substance over the form.​

 18

●​ Case: K.C. Gajapati Narayan Deo v. State of Orissa – established this principle.​

6. Status of Fundamental Rights during Emergency

●​ During National Emergency (Article 352):​

○​ Rights under Article 19 are automatically suspended.​

●​ President can suspend enforcement of other FRs (except Articles 20 and 21) under Article 359.​

●​ During President’s Rule or Financial Emergency, FRs are not suspended.​

7. Amendment of Fundamental Rights

●​ Fundamental Rights can be amended by Parliament under Article 368.​

●​ Basic Structure Doctrine (Kesavananda Bharati case, 1973) limits this power.​

●​ Parliament cannot alter the basic structure of the Constitution, including essential aspects of FRs like judicial
review or secularism.​

8. Reasonable Opportunity to Civil Servants

●​ Under Article 311, civil servants are entitled to:​

○​ Prior notice of charges​

○​ Right to a hearing​

●​ Protects against arbitrary dismissal, removal, or reduction in rank.​

●​ Exceptions apply in cases of:​

○​ Conviction on a criminal charge​

○​ National security concerns​

○​ Impracticability of inquiry​

9. Administrative Tribunal for Service Matters

●​ Established under Article 323-A and the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985.​

●​ Deals with recruitment and service conditions of public servants.​

●​ Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) is for Union employees.​

●​ State Tribunals can be set up for state employees.​

●​ Aims to provide speedy, specialized, and cost-effective justice.​

 19

10. Jurisdiction of Central Tribunal

●​ The Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) has jurisdiction over:​

○​ All service-related disputes of Central Government employees​

○​ Includes matters like appointment, promotion, transfer, disciplinary actions​

●​ Excludes armed forces, judiciary, and certain other categories.​

●​ CAT decisions can be challenged before the High Court under Article 226/227 (per L. Chandra Kumar case, 1997).​

The Indian Parliament is the supreme legislative body of the Republic of India. It is a bicameral legislature, meaning it consists
of two houses, and includes the President of India as an integral part. The Parliament plays a pivotal role in shaping and
implementing legislation, representing the diverse voices of the nation, and upholding the principles of democracy.

Structure and Composition

The Indian Parliament comprises three parts:

1.​ The President of India: Although the President is not a member of either House, they are an integral part of the
Parliament. The President performs certain functions related to the Parliament's working, such as summoning and
proroguing (ending a session) either House and dissolving the Lok Sabha. A bill passed by both Houses cannot
become a law without the President's assent.​

2.​ Lok Sabha (House of the People):​

○​ Nature: It is the lower house or the popular house, representing the people of India directly.
○​ Composition: The maximum strength of the Lok Sabha is 552 members.​

■​ 530 members are directly elected by the people from territorial constituencies in the states.
■​ 20 members represent the Union Territories, chosen in a manner prescribed by Parliament.
■​ 2 members from the Anglo-Indian community can be nominated by the President if he/she feels
that the community is not adequately represented (this provision was discontinued in 2020 by the
104th Constitutional Amendment Act).
○​ Term: The normal term of the Lok Sabha is five years, after which it automatically dissolves. However, it
can be dissolved earlier by the President, or its term can be extended for one year at a time during a
National Emergency.
○​ Elections: Members are elected directly by the people through universal adult suffrage (anyone above 18
years of age can vote).
○​ Presiding Officer: The Lok Sabha is presided over by the Speaker, who is elected from amongst its
members. The Speaker maintains order and decorum in the House and conducts its proceedings.
3.​ Rajya Sabha (Council of States):​

○​ Nature: It is the upper house or the House of Elders, representing the states and Union Territories of
India. It is a permanent body and is not subject to dissolution.
○​ Composition: The maximum strength of the Rajya Sabha is 250 members.
■​ 238 members are elected indirectly by the elected members of the State Legislative Assemblies
through proportional representation by means of the single transferable vote.
■​ 12 members are nominated by the President from among persons having special knowledge or
practical experience in fields such as literature, science, art, and social service.
○​ Term: Rajya Sabha is a permanent body. One-third of its members retire every second year, and new
members are elected to replace them. Each member has a term of six years.
○​ Presiding Officer: The Vice-President of India is the ex-officio Chairman of the Rajya Sabha. The House
also elects a Deputy Chairman from among its members.

Powers and Functions of the Indian Parliament

The Indian Parliament performs a wide range of functions that are crucial to the functioning of a parliamentary democracy.
These include:
 20

1.​ Legislative Functions:​

○​ Law-making: This is the primary function. Parliament makes laws on subjects enumerated in the Union
List and the Concurrent List (Seventh Schedule of the Constitution).
○​ Residuary Powers: It has exclusive power to legislate on any matter not mentioned in any of the three
lists.
○​ State List under specific circumstances: Parliament can also make laws on subjects in the State List
under certain extraordinary conditions, such as:
■​ When the Rajya Sabha passes a resolution (by 2/3rd majority) declaring it necessary in the
national interest (Article 249).
■​ During a National Emergency (Article 250).
■​ When two or more states request Parliament to do so (Article 252).
■​ To implement international treaties or agreements (Article 253).
■​ During President's Rule in a state.
2.​ Executive Functions (Control over the Executive):​

○​ In a parliamentary system, the executive (Council of Ministers, headed by the Prime Minister) is collectively
responsible to the Lok Sabha.
○​ Vote of No-Confidence: The Parliament can remove the government by passing a vote of no-confidence
against the Council of Ministers (only in Lok Sabha).
○​ Question Hour and Zero Hour: Members can ask questions to ministers, raising issues and seeking
accountability.
○​ Motions: Various motions (e.g., adjournment motion, censure motion, calling attention motion, cut motion)
are used to exert control and scrutinize government policies.
○​ Parliamentary Committees: Committees (e.g., Public Accounts Committee, Estimates Committee)
monitor the government's performance and expenditure.
3.​ Financial Functions:​

○​Custody of Public Money: Parliament is the guardian of the nation's finances. No money can be spent or
tax imposed without its approval.
○​ Approval of Budget: The annual Union Budget, containing the government's financial proposals for
revenue and expenditure, must be approved by Parliament.
○​ Scrutiny of Expenditure: Parliamentary committees examine government spending to ensure
accountability and proper utilization of funds.
4.​ Amending Powers:​

○​ Parliament has the power to amend the Constitution as per the procedure laid down in Article 368.
○​ This power is subject to the Basic Structure Doctrine, meaning Parliament cannot amend the
fundamental features of the Constitution.
5.​ Electoral Functions:​

○​ Members of Parliament (along with elected members of State Legislative Assemblies) participate in the
election of the President of India.
○​ All members of Parliament participate in the election of the Vice-President of India.
○​ The Lok Sabha elects its Speaker and Deputy Speaker, and the Rajya Sabha elects its Deputy Chairman.
6.​ Judicial Functions:​

○​ Impeachment: Parliament has the power to impeach the President for violation of the Constitution.
○​ Removal of Judges: It can recommend the removal of judges of the Supreme Court and High Courts, the
Chief Election Commissioner, and the Comptroller and Auditor General through a prescribed procedure.
○​ Punishment for Breach of Privilege: Parliament can punish its members or outsiders for breach of its
privileges or contempt.
7.​ Other Powers and Functions:​

○​ Declaration of Emergency: Parliament approves all proclamations of National, State, and Financial
Emergencies issued by the President.
○​ Formation of New States/Alteration of Boundaries: It can form new states, alter the area, boundaries,
or names of existing states.
○​ Creation/Abolition of Legislative Councils: Parliament can create or abolish Legislative Councils in
states if the concerned State Legislative Assembly passes a resolution to that effect.
○​ Deliberative Body: Parliament serves as the highest forum for debate and discussion on various national
and international issues, providing a platform for diverse viewpoints.
○​ Organ of Information: Ministers are bound to provide information in the Houses when demanded by
members.
 21

In India's federal system, each state has its own legislative body, known as the State Legislature, which is responsible for
making laws for that particular state. Similar to the Union Parliament, a State Legislature can be either unicameral (one house)
or bicameral (two houses).

Structure and Composition

The State Legislature consists of:

1.​ The Governor: The Governor is the head of the State executive and an integral part of the State Legislature, just as
the President is an integral part of the Union Parliament. The Governor has powers to summon and prorogue (end a
session) the House(s), and to dissolve the Legislative Assembly. A bill passed by the State Legislature cannot
become a law without the Governor's assent.​

2.​ State Legislative Assembly (Vidhan Sabha):​

○​ Nature: This is the lower house and the popular house at the state level. Its members are directly
elected by the people of the state. It is the more powerful house in a bicameral legislature.
○​ Composition:
■​ The maximum strength of a Legislative Assembly is 500 members, and the minimum strength is
60 members. However, exceptions exist for smaller states like Goa, Sikkim, Mizoram, and the
Union Territory of Puducherry, which have fewer than 60 members.
■​ Members are chosen by direct election from territorial constituencies within the state through
universal adult suffrage.
■​ The Governor can nominate one member from the Anglo-Indian community if he/she feels
that the community is not adequately represented (this provision was discontinued in 2020 by the
104th Constitutional Amendment Act).
○​ Term: The normal term of a Legislative Assembly is five years, after which it automatically dissolves.
However, it can be dissolved earlier by the Governor (usually on the advice of the Chief Minister or if the
government loses confidence). Its term can also be extended for one year at a time during a National
Emergency.
○​ Presiding Officer: The Legislative Assembly is presided over by the Speaker, who is elected from among
its members. A Deputy Speaker is also elected to preside in the Speaker's absence.
3.​ State Legislative Council (Vidhan Parishad):​

○​ Nature: This is the upper house or the "House of Elders" at the state level. It is a permanent body and is
not subject to dissolution.
○​ Bicameral States: Currently, only six Indian states have a Legislative Council:
■​ Andhra Pradesh
■​ Bihar
■​ Karnataka
■​ Maharashtra
■​ Telangana
■​ Uttar Pradesh
○​ Creation/Abolition: The Constitution provides for the creation or abolition of a Legislative Council in a
state. Parliament can do so by a simple majority if the concerned State Legislative Assembly passes a
resolution to that effect by a special majority (i.e., a majority of the total membership of the Assembly and a
majority of not less than two-thirds of the members present and voting).
○​ Composition: The total number of members in the Legislative Council cannot exceed one-third of the
total number of members in the Legislative Assembly of that state, and in no case can it be less than
40 members (except for Jammu & Kashmir, which had 36 before its reorganization). Members are
elected/nominated in a complex manner:
■​ 1/3rd by members of local bodies (municipalities, district boards).
■​ 1/3rd by members of the Legislative Assembly from amongst persons who are not members of
the Assembly.
■​ 1/12th by graduates of three years' standing residing in the state.
■​ 1/12th by teachers of three years' standing in secondary schools or higher educational
institutions within the state.
■​ 1/6th are nominated by the Governor from persons having special knowledge or practical
experience in fields such as literature, science, art, the cooperative movement, and social
service.
○​ Term: Like the Rajya Sabha, the Legislative Council is a permanent body. One-third of its members retire
every second year, and new members are elected/nominated to replace them. Each member has a term of
six years.
 22

○​ Presiding Officer: The Legislative Council is presided over by a Chairman and a Deputy Chairman,
elected from among its members.

Powers and Functions of the State Legislature

The State Legislature primarily functions to make laws for the state, control the executive, and manage state finances.

1.​ Legislative Functions:​

○​ Law-making: The primary function is to make laws on subjects listed in the State List and the Concurrent
List of the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution.
○​ In case of conflict on a Concurrent List subject, a law made by the State Legislature will prevail over a
Union law only if it has received the President's assent. Otherwise, the Union law prevails.
○​ Ordinary Bills: Can originate in either house (if bicameral). If there's a disagreement, the Legislative
Assembly has overriding powers. The Council can only delay an ordinary bill for a maximum of three
months on its first passage and one month on its second passage (total of four months). The Assembly can
then pass it again, and it is deemed to have been passed by both houses.
2.​ Financial Functions:​

○​ Money Bills: These can only be introduced in the Legislative Assembly, not the Legislative Council.
○​ The Legislative Council can only make recommendations on a Money Bill and must return it to the
Assembly within 14 days. The Assembly is free to accept or reject these recommendations.
○​ Budget Approval: The annual budget of the state, presented by the state government, must be approved
by the Legislative Assembly. The Assembly controls the state's finances and authorizes all taxation and
expenditure.
3.​ Executive Functions (Control over the Executive):​

○​ In the parliamentary system, the Council of Ministers in a state is collectively responsible to the
Legislative Assembly.
○​ Vote of No-Confidence: The Legislative Assembly can remove the state government by passing a vote of
no-confidence against the Council of Ministers. The Legislative Council has no power in this regard.
○​ Question Hour, Zero Hour, Motions: Members of the Legislative Assembly can ask questions to
ministers, move various motions (e.g., adjournment motion, censure motion) to hold the government
accountable and discuss matters of public importance.
4.​ Electoral Functions:​

○​ The elected members of the State Legislative Assembly participate in the election of the President of
India.
○​ The Legislative Assembly elects its own Speaker and Deputy Speaker.
○​ Members of the Legislative Assembly participate in the election of members of the Rajya Sabha from their
respective states.
○​ Members of the Legislative Assembly (if bicameral) also elect some members of the Legislative Council.
5.​ Constitutional Functions:​

○​ Certain amendments to the Constitution require ratification by the legislatures of half of the states after
being passed by Parliament. The State Legislatures play a role in this process.
○​ As mentioned, the State Legislative Assembly initiates the resolution for the creation or abolition of its own
Legislative Council.
6.​ Other Powers:​

○​ Receives reports from bodies like the State Public Service Commission and the Comptroller and Auditor
General relating to state accounts.
○​ Can participate in debates on matters of state importance.

Superiority of Legislative Assembly over Legislative Council

It is evident that the Legislative Assembly (Vidhan Sabha) is far more powerful than the Legislative Council (Vidhan
Parishad). This is primarily because:

●​ The Assembly is directly elected by the people, making it the more democratic and representative body.
●​ The Council cannot remove the government through a no-confidence motion.
●​ The Council has limited powers over Money Bills and can only delay ordinary bills for a maximum of four months.
 23

🏛️ Privileges of the Legislature in India

Legislative privileges are certain special rights and immunities enjoyed by each House of Parliament and State Legislatures,
and their members, to enable them to function independently and effectively. They are intended to protect the dignity, authority,
and independence of the legislative bodies.

📜 Constitutional Provisions
These privileges are mentioned under Articles 105 (for Parliament) and 194 (for State Legislatures) of the Constitution. They
include both collective privileges of the House and individual privileges of the members.

1. Freedom of Speech in the House

Members can speak freely without fear of legal action for anything said in the House or its committees. This freedom is
protected under Article 105(1) and Article 194(1) and is subject to the rules of procedure and discipline of the House.

2. Immunity from Legal Proceedings

Members cannot be prosecuted or sued for anything said or any vote cast in the House or its committees. This also protects the
publication of reports, debates, and proceedings authorized by the House.

3. Freedom from Arrest

Members are exempt from civil arrest during the session of the legislature and 40 days before and after the session. This does
not apply to criminal cases or preventive detention.

4. Exemption from Jury and Court Attendance

Members cannot be compelled to appear in court or serve on a jury during sessions of the House or its committees.

5. Right to Regulate Internal Affairs

Each House has the exclusive right to regulate its internal proceedings, including maintaining order, deciding questions of
privilege, and disciplining members for disorderly conduct or breach of privilege.

6. Right to Punish for Contempt

The House can punish any person, including non-members, for breach of privilege or contempt, such as obstructing legislative
work or disrespecting the authority of the House.

7. Protection of Legislative Proceedings

Legislative proceedings are protected from judicial interference. Courts generally do not inquire into the validity of proceedings
in the legislature on grounds of alleged irregularities in procedure, unless there is a violation of constitutional provisions.

⚖️ Important Case Laws

In the Keshav Singh Case (1965), the Supreme Court clarified that legislative privilege does not override the fundamental rights
of citizens or judicial review.

In P.V. Narasimha Rao v. State (1998), the Court held that MPs are protected from prosecution for taking bribes to vote or
speak in Parliament if the act is part of their legislative function.

I. Legislative Relations Between Union and States

 24

The Indian Constitution establishes a federal system with a clear distribution of legislative powers between the Union (Central)
government and the State governments. This distribution is primarily laid out in Part XI (Articles 245-255) and the Seventh
Schedule of the Constitution.

1. Territorial Extent of Laws (Article 245)

●​ Parliament: Can make laws for the whole or any part of the territory of India. Importantly, its laws can also have
"extra-territorial operation," meaning they can apply to Indian citizens and their property even outside India. This is
crucial for regulating activities of Indian citizens abroad or transactions with an international element.
●​ State Legislature: Can make laws only for the whole or any part of that particular State. Generally, state laws
cannot have extra-territorial operation unless there's a sufficient "territorial nexus" (a real and substantial connection
between the subject matter of the law and the State). For example, a state can levy a tax on income earned from
activities within its borders, even if the recipient resides outside the state.

2. Distribution of Legislative Subjects (Article 246 and Seventh Schedule)

The Seventh Schedule contains three lists that clearly demarcate the legislative competencies:

●​ Union List (List I):

○​ Contains subjects of national importance on which only the Parliament has exclusive power to legislate.
○​ Examples: Defence, foreign affairs, atomic energy, banking, currency, railways, communication, inter-state
trade and commerce, citizenship, extradition, copyright, etc.
○​ Currently has about 97 subjects (originally 97).
●​ State List (List II):
○​ Contains subjects of local and regional importance on which only the State Legislatures have exclusive
power to legislate.
○​ Examples: Public order, police, public health and sanitation, agriculture, local government, prisons,
fisheries, land, markets and fairs, gas, etc.
○​ Currently has about 59 subjects (originally 66, some subjects were transferred to the Concurrent List).
●​ Concurrent List (List III):
○​ Contains subjects of common interest to both the Union and State governments. Both Parliament and
State Legislatures can make laws on these subjects.
○​ Examples: Criminal law, criminal procedure, marriage and divorce, education, forests, trade unions,
electricity, drugs, economic and social planning, administration of justice (except SC & HC), etc.
○​ Currently has about 52 subjects (originally 47, five subjects were transferred from the State List by the
42nd Amendment Act, 1976).
○​ In case of conflict: If there's a conflict between a Union law and a State law on a subject in the Concurrent
List, the Union law generally prevails (doctrine of repugnancy). However, if a State law on a
Concurrent List subject has been reserved for the President's consideration and has received his assent,
then the State law will prevail in that State, even if it contradicts an earlier Central law on the same subject.
The Parliament can, however, subsequently enact a law overriding the State law.

3. Residuary Powers (Article 248)

●​ The Constitution grants the Parliament exclusive power to make laws with respect to any matter not
enumerated in the Concurrent List or the State List.
●​ This also includes the power to make laws imposing taxes not mentioned in either of those lists.
●​ This provision significantly strengthens the Union government, as it allows it to legislate on new subjects that may
emerge with technological advancements or societal changes and were not foreseen at the time of the Constitution's
drafting (e.g., cyber laws).

4. Parliamentary Legislation in the State Field (Articles 249, 250, 252, 253, 356)

While the State List generally grants exclusive powers to the states, the Constitution provides certain extraordinary
circumstances under which the Parliament can legislate on subjects in the State List:

●​ In the National Interest (Article 249): If the Rajya Sabha passes a resolution (by a 2/3rd majority of members
present and voting) declaring that it is necessary or expedient in the national interest for Parliament to make laws on
a specified State List subject, Parliament can legislate on that subject. Such a resolution remains in force for one year
but can be extended multiple times.
●​ During a Proclamation of National Emergency (Article 250): While a Proclamation of National Emergency (under
Article 352) is in operation, Parliament acquires the power to make laws on any subject in the State List. Such laws
cease to operate six months after the emergency ceases to operate.
 25

●​ By Agreement between States (Article 252): If the legislatures of two or more States pass resolutions requesting
Parliament to make a law on a State List subject for those States, Parliament can do so. Such a law would apply only
to those consenting States and any other State that later adopts it by resolution.
●​ To Implement International Treaties (Article 253): Parliament can make laws on any subject for implementing any
treaty, international agreement, or convention, even if it falls within the State List. This ensures India can fulfill its
international obligations.
●​ During President's Rule (Article 356): When President's Rule is imposed in a State due to the failure of
constitutional machinery, the President can authorize Parliament to exercise the powers of the State Legislature.

II. Administrative Relations Between Union and States

Administrative relations deal with the executive power and responsibilities of the Union and State governments, ensuring
coordination and cooperation in the administration of laws. These are primarily covered in Part XI (Articles 256-263) of the
Constitution.

1. Distribution of Executive Power (Articles 73 and 162)

●​ Union Executive: Extends to matters on which Parliament has exclusive power to make laws (Union List) and also
to the exercise of rights, authority, and jurisdiction conferred by any treaty or agreement.
●​ State Executive: Extends to matters on which the State Legislature has exclusive power to make laws (State List).
On Concurrent List subjects, the executive power generally rests with the State, but Parliament can explicitly confer
executive power on the Union through a law.

2. Obligation of States and the Centre's Control (Articles 256-257)

●​ Obligation of States (Article 256): The executive power of every State must be exercised in such a way as to
ensure compliance with laws made by Parliament and existing laws that apply in the State. The Union executive can
give directions to a State to ensure this compliance.
●​ Union's Control over States (Article 257):
○​ The executive power of every State must be exercised so as not to impede or prejudice the exercise of the
executive power of the Union.
○​ The Union executive has the power to give directions to a State as to the construction and maintenance of
means of communication (e.g., national highways, railways) declared to be of national or military
importance.
○​ The Union can also give directions for the protection of railways within a State.
○​ States are obligated to comply with these directions. Failure to comply can lead to the President concluding
that the government of the State cannot be carried on in accordance with constitutional provisions,
potentially leading to President's Rule (Article 365).

3. Delegation of Functions (Articles 258 & 258A)

●​ Delegation by Union to State (Article 258): The President can, with the consent of the State Government, entrust
to that government or its officers, functions relating to any matter to which the executive power of the Union extends.
Parliament can also confer powers and impose duties upon State officers or authorities regarding matters on which
Parliament has the power to make laws.
●​ Delegation by State to Union (Article 258A): The Governor of a State can, with the consent of the Central
Government, entrust to that Government or its officers, functions relating to any matter to which the executive power
of the State extends. This was added by the 7th Amendment Act, 1956.

4. All-India Services (Article 312)

●​ The All-India Services (IAS, IPS, IFS) are recruited and trained by the Union, but their officers serve in State cadres.
They are common to both the Union and the States.
●​ This ensures uniformity in administration and helps in maintaining high standards of efficiency and impartiality across
the country, while also fostering coordination.

5. Inter-State Council (Article 263)

●​ The President can establish an Inter-State Council if it appears to him that the public interest would be served by its
establishment.
 26

●​ Functions:
○​ Inquiring into and advising upon disputes between States.
○​ Investigating and discussing subjects of common interest to the Union and the States (or between States).
○​ Making recommendations for better coordination of policy and action.
●​ It acts as a forum for inter-governmental coordination and consultation, fostering cooperative federalism. The
Sarkaria Commission recommended its establishment, and it was set up in 1990.

6. Other Provisions

●​ Full Faith and Credit (Article 261): Full faith and credit shall be given throughout the territory of India to public acts,
records, and judicial proceedings of the Union and of every State. This ensures mutual respect for legislative and
judicial acts across states.
●​ Inter-State Water Disputes (Article 262): Parliament can by law provide for the adjudication of any dispute or
complaint with respect to the use, distribution, or control of the waters of, or in, any inter-State river or river valley. It
can also provide that neither the Supreme Court nor any other court shall exercise jurisdiction in respect of any such
dispute.
●​ Public Service Commissions: Both Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) and State Public Service
Commissions (SPSCs) assist in recruitment for public services.

III. The State Liability

The liability of the Union and State governments in India, both in contract and in tort (civil wrongs), is a crucial aspect of
constitutional law. Articles 299 and 300 of the Constitution of India deal with this subject, laying down the procedural and
substantive framework for how the government can enter into contracts and how it can sue or be sued.

A. Article 299: Contracts

Article 299 primarily deals with the contractual liability of the Union and State governments. It sets out the essential
formalities that must be complied with for a contract made by the government to be valid and binding. This article is vital for
safeguarding public funds and ensuring transparency and accountability in government dealings.

Key provisions of Article 299:

●​ Article 299(1): Form and Execution of Contracts

○​ "All contracts made in the exercise of the executive power of the Union or of a State shall be expressed to
be made by the President, or by the Governor of the State, as the case may be, and all such contracts
and all assurances of property made in the exercise of that power shall be executed on behalf of the
President or the Governor by such persons and in such manner as he may direct or authorise."
○​ Mandatory Requirements: This clause lays down three critical, cumulative conditions for a valid
government contract:
1.​ Expression: The contract must be expressly made in the name of the President (for the Union)
or the Governor (for the State).
2.​ Execution: The contract must be executed on behalf of the President or the Governor.
3.​ Authorization: The execution must be by a person duly authorized by the President or
Governor, and in the manner directed.
○​ Purpose: The primary objective is to protect the government against unauthorized or fraudulent contracts
and to provide a clear record of its contractual obligations. It's a public policy safeguard to prevent misuse
of public funds.
○​ Consequence of Non-Compliance: The Supreme Court has consistently held that the provisions of
Article 299(1) are mandatory. Any contract that does not strictly comply with these conditions is void and
unenforceable. There is no question of estoppel or ratification in such cases, meaning the government
cannot be held liable even if it has received a benefit from a void contract. However, in certain
circumstances, a party who has rendered services or supplied goods under a void government contract
might be able to claim compensation under Section 70 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 (for unjust
enrichment/quantum meruit).
●​ Article 299(2): Personal Non-Liability
○​ "Neither the President nor the Governor shall be personally liable in respect of any contract or assurance
made or executed for the purposes of this Constitution, or for the purposes of any enactment relating to the
Government of India heretofore in force, nor shall any person making or executing any such contract or
assurance on behalf of any of them be personally liable in respect thereof."
 27

○​ Protection for President/Governor and Officials: This clause grants immunity from personal liability to
the President, Governors, and the officials who execute contracts on their behalf. This is because they are
acting as agents of the Union or State government, and the liability rests with the government as a legal
entity, not with the individuals.

B. Article 300: Suits and Proceedings

Article 300 deals with the capacity of the Union and State governments to sue and be sued, and the extent of their liability,
particularly in tort (civil wrongs). It clarifies the legal personality of the government in legal proceedings.

Key provisions of Article 300:

●​ Article 300(1): Right to Sue and Be Sued

○​ "The Government of India may sue or be sued by the name of the Union of India and the Government of a
State may sue or be sued by the name of the State and may, subject to any provisions which may be made
by Act of Parliament or of the Legislature of such State enacted by virtue of powers conferred by this
Constitution, sue or be sued in relation to their respective affairs in the like cases as the Dominion of
India and the corresponding Provinces or the corresponding Indian States might have sued or been
sued if this Constitution had not been enacted."
○​ Legal Persona: This clause establishes that the Government of India and the Government of a State are
legal entities that can sue and be sued in their respective names (e.g., "Union of India" or "State of
Haryana").
○​ Extent of Liability (Reference to Pre-Constitution Era): The crucial part is the phrase tracing liability
back to the position of the "Dominion of India and the corresponding Provinces or the corresponding Indian
States" before the Constitution. This effectively meant that the extent of governmental liability was
determined by the legal position under the Government of India Act, 1858 (Section 65), which, in turn,
linked it to the liability of the East India Company.
○​ Historical Legacy: Sovereign vs. Non-Sovereign Functions (Tortious Liability): Due to this historical
linkage, Indian courts initially adopted the English common law doctrine of "sovereign immunity" which
distinguished between sovereign and non-sovereign (commercial/trading) functions.
■​ Sovereign Functions: Activities that are inherently governmental (e.g., maintaining law and
order, administering justice, defense, revenue collection). The State was generally immune from
liability for torts committed by its servants while performing these functions (Kasturi Lal Ralia
Ram Jain v. State of U.P., 1965).
■​ Non-Sovereign Functions: Activities that could also be performed by private individuals (e.g.,
running railways, factories). For torts committed in the course of non-sovereign functions, the
State could be held liable.
○​ Evolution and Narrowing of Sovereign Immunity: Post-Kasturi Lal, the judiciary, recognizing the welfare
state concept and the need for accountability, has progressively narrowed the scope of sovereign immunity.
■​ State of Rajasthan v. Smt. Vidyawati (1962): The Supreme Court held the State liable for the
tortious act of its employee while driving an official jeep, as it was a non-sovereign function.
■​ N. Nagendra Rao & Co. v. State of A.P. (1994): This landmark case severely curtailed the
doctrine of sovereign immunity, stating that the "doctrine of sovereign immunity has no relevance
in the modern era." It held that the State is liable for the tortious acts of its employees unless it
can show that the act was in the exercise of truly sovereign functions or protected by a statute.
■​ Modern Trend: The trend is strongly towards making the State liable for torts committed by its
employees, especially in cases of negligence, unless the act is directly traceable to the exercise
of purely "sovereign" functions that no private citizen could perform, and where there is no
statutory provision for liability. The focus has shifted from who performed the act to the nature
and purpose of the function.
●​ Article 300(2): Continuity of Pending Proceedings
○​ This clause ensures the continuity of legal proceedings that were pending against the Dominion of India,
Provinces, or Indian States before the commencement of the Constitution. The Union of India or the
corresponding State would be substituted as the party in those proceedings.

Significance of Articles 299 and 300:

●​ Accountability: These articles, particularly with judicial interpretations, ensure that the government, like any other
legal entity, is subject to the rule of law and can be held accountable for its actions, both in contracts and torts.
●​ Protection of Public Funds: Article 299's strict formalities prevent unauthorized or fraudulent contracts,
safeguarding public money.
●​ Citizen's Redressal: Article 300 provides a mechanism for citizens to seek redress against the government for
wrongs committed against them, reinforcing the principle of justice and fairness in a democratic state.
 28

●​ Checks and Balances: They act as a check on executive power, ensuring that government actions are within legal
bounds and that officials act responsibly.

Emergency provisions are an integral part of the Indian Constitution, enshrined in Part XVIII (Articles 352 to 360). These
provisions enable the Central Government to meet any abnormal situation effectively, particularly those posing a threat to the
country's sovereignty, unity, integrity, security, and democratic political system. While they grant extraordinary powers to the
Union executive, they are designed to be used only in exceptional circumstances.

The Constitution provides for three types of emergencies:

1.​ National Emergency (Article 352)

2.​ State Emergency / President's Rule (Article 356 & 365)
3.​ Financial Emergency (Article 360)

Let's discuss each in detail:

1. National Emergency (Article 352)

This type of emergency can be proclaimed when the security of India or a part of it is threatened.

Grounds for Declaration: The President can declare a National Emergency on the grounds of:

●​ War: Actual engagement in armed conflict with another country.

●​ External Aggression: A threat of armed attack or invasion from another country, even without actual warfare.
●​ Armed Rebellion: A domestic uprising where a group of people is resorting to arms to overthrow the government.
(Originally, this ground was "internal disturbance." The 44th Constitutional Amendment Act, 1978, replaced it with
"armed rebellion" to prevent the misuse of emergency powers, as seen in 1975).

Important Points:

●​ The President can declare a National Emergency even before the actual occurrence of war, external aggression, or
armed rebellion, if there is an imminent threat.
●​ The proclamation can be for the whole of India or only a part of its territory.
●​ The President can issue the proclamation only upon the written recommendation of the Union Cabinet. This
crucial safeguard was added by the 44th Amendment Act, 1978, to prevent the Prime Minister from unilaterally
taking such a drastic decision.

Parliamentary Approval and Duration:

●​ A proclamation of National Emergency must be approved by both Houses of Parliament within one month from the
date of its issue.
●​ Approval requires a special majority in both Houses (i.e., a majority of the total membership of the House and a
majority of not less than two-thirds of the members of that House present and voting).
●​ Once approved, the emergency remains in force for six months.
●​ It can be extended for an indefinite period with repeated parliamentary approvals every six months, each requiring a
special majority.

Revocation:

●​ The President can revoke the proclamation at any time by a subsequent proclamation.
●​ The President must revoke the proclamation if the Lok Sabha passes a resolution disapproving its continuation
by a simple majority of members present and voting. This power was also added by the 44th Amendment Act, 1978.

Consequences of Proclamation of National Emergency:

1.​ Executive Consequences:​

○​ The executive power of the Union extends to giving directions to any State on any matter. This means
state governments, while not suspended, come under the complete control of the Centre. The federal
character of the government transforms into a unitary one.
 29

2.​ Legislative Consequences:​

○​ Parliament's Power to Legislate on State List: Parliament acquires the power to make laws on any
subject enumerated in the State List, even if it usually falls within the exclusive domain of the State
Legislatures.
○​ State Legislature's Power not Suspended: The power of a State Legislature to make laws on subjects in
the State List is not suspended. However, in case of conflict between a State law and a Parliamentary law
on a State List subject during the emergency, the Parliamentary law prevails.
○​ Laws made by Parliament on State List subjects during the emergency become inoperative six months
after the emergency ceases to operate.
○​ The President can issue ordinances on State List subjects if Parliament is not in session.
3.​ Financial Consequences:​

○​ The President can issue orders to modify the provisions regarding the distribution of revenues
between the Union and the States. This means the Centre can reallocate financial resources, potentially
reducing transfers to states to meet its emergency needs.
4.​ Impact on the Life of Lok Sabha and State Assembly:​

○​ The normal life of the Lok Sabha (5 years) can be extended by a law of Parliament for one year at a time,
for any length of time. However, this extension cannot continue beyond a period of six months after the
emergency ceases to operate.
○​ Similarly, the normal term of a State Legislative Assembly can also be extended by Parliament for one
year at a time, subject to the same six-month limit after the emergency ends.
5.​ Impact on Fundamental Rights (Articles 358 & 359):​

○​ Suspension of Article 19 Rights (Article 358): When a National Emergency is declared on the grounds
of war or external aggression, the six rights guaranteed by Article 19 (freedom of speech, assembly,
association, movement, residence, and profession) are automatically suspended. No separate order is
required. However, if the emergency is declared on the ground of armed rebellion, Article 19 rights are not
automatically suspended.
○​ Suspension of Other Fundamental Rights (Article 359): The President can, by order, suspend the right
to move any court for the enforcement of other Fundamental Rights (except for the rights guaranteed by
Articles 20 and 21 - protection in respect of conviction for offences and protection of life and personal
liberty, respectively). This suspension order can be for the whole or part of India and for the entire period of
emergency or a shorter period. The 44th Amendment Act, 1978, crucially stipulated that Articles 20 and
21 can never be suspended during a National Emergency.

2. State Emergency / President's Rule (Article 356 & 365)

Commonly known as 'President's Rule' or 'Constitutional Emergency', this provision deals with the failure of constitutional
machinery in a State.

Grounds for Declaration: The President can declare a State Emergency if:

●​ He is satisfied, on receipt of a report from the Governor of a State or otherwise, that a situation has arisen in which
the government of the State cannot be carried on in accordance with the provisions of the Constitution (Article
356).
●​ A State fails to comply with or give effect to any directions given by the Union (Article 365). In such a case, it
becomes lawful for the President to hold that a situation has arisen where the state cannot be governed
constitutionally.

Parliamentary Approval and Duration:

●​ A proclamation of President's Rule must be approved by both Houses of Parliament within two months from the
date of its issue.
●​ Approval requires a simple majority in both Houses.
●​ Once approved, it generally remains in force for six months.
●​ It can be extended for a maximum period of three years, with parliamentary approval every six months.
●​ However, after one year, President's Rule can only be extended if:
○​ A National Emergency is in operation in the whole of India or in the whole or any part of the concerned
State.
○​ The Election Commission certifies that the general elections to the Legislative Assembly of the concerned
State cannot be held due to difficulties.
 30

Revocation:

●​ The President can revoke the proclamation at any time by a subsequent proclamation. No parliamentary approval is
required for revocation.

Consequences of Proclamation of State Emergency:

1.​ Executive Consequences:​

○​ The President assumes to himself all or any of the functions of the State Government and the
Governor.
○​ The President can declare that the powers of the State Legislature shall be exercisable by or under the
authority of Parliament.
○​ The State Executive is dismissed, and its powers are exercised by the Centre (through the Governor,
who acts as the President's agent).
2.​ Legislative Consequences:​

○​ The State Legislature is either suspended or dissolved.

○​ Parliament gets the power to make laws for the State.
○​ Parliament can delegate the power to make laws for the State to the President. The President, in turn,
can further delegate it to any other authority (e.g., a Chief Secretary of the State).
○​ When the Lok Sabha is not in session, the President can issue ordinances for the State.
3.​ Financial Consequences:​

○​ There are no specific financial consequences related to the distribution of revenue as in a National
Emergency. However, the Parliament gets control over the State's budget and expenditure.
4.​ Impact on Fundamental Rights:​

○​ Unlike a National Emergency, President's Rule does not directly affect the Fundamental Rights of the
citizens of the State.

Judicial Review of President's Rule:

●​ The 38th Amendment Act (1975) made the President's satisfaction in imposing President's Rule final and beyond
judicial review. However, the 44th Amendment Act (1978) removed this clause, making the President's satisfaction
subject to judicial review.
●​ The Supreme Court, in S.R. Bommai v. Union of India (1994), held that the President's power under Article 356 is
not absolute and that the proclamation is subject to judicial review on grounds of mala fide (bad faith) or extraneous
considerations. This landmark judgment significantly curbed the arbitrary use of Article 356.

3. Financial Emergency (Article 360)

This emergency can be declared when the financial stability or credit of India or any part of its territory is threatened.

Grounds for Declaration:

●​ If the President is satisfied that a situation has arisen whereby the financial stability or credit of India or any part
of its territory is threatened.

Parliamentary Approval and Duration:

●​ A proclamation of Financial Emergency must be approved by both Houses of Parliament within two months from
the date of its issue.
●​ Approval requires a simple majority.
●​ Once approved, it continues indefinitely until revoked by the President. There is no maximum period prescribed for
its operation, nor does it require repeated parliamentary approvals.

Revocation:

●​ The President can revoke the proclamation at any time by a subsequent proclamation. No parliamentary approval is
required for revocation.

Consequences of Proclamation of Financial Emergency:

 31

1.​ Executive Consequences:​

○​ The executive authority of the Union extends to giving directions to any State to observe such canons
of financial propriety as may be specified in the directions.
○​ The Union can direct a State to reduce the salaries and allowances of all or any class of persons serving in
connection with the affairs of the State (including High Court judges).
2.​ Legislative Consequences:​

○​ All money bills and other financial bills passed by the State Legislature can be reserved for the
consideration of the President after they are passed by the State Legislature.
3.​ Financial Consequences:​

○​ The President can issue directions for the reduction of salaries and allowances of Union employees,
including Supreme Court and High Court judges.
○​ The Centre gets complete control over the financial affairs of the States.
4.​ Impact on Fundamental Rights:​

○​ A Financial Emergency does not directly affect the Fundamental Rights of citizens.

So far, no Financial Emergency has ever been declared in India.

General Criticisms and Safeguards

Emergency provisions are often criticized for their potential to lead to the over-centralization of power and the suppression of
civil liberties. However, they are justified as necessary evils to protect the unity, integrity, and sovereignty of the nation in times
of grave crisis.

Over time, particularly after the experience of the 1975 National Emergency, significant safeguards have been introduced,
primarily through the 44th Constitutional Amendment Act, 1978, to prevent the misuse of these extraordinary powers and to
ensure greater parliamentary and judicial oversight. These include:

●​ Requirement of written cabinet recommendation for National Emergency.

●​ Change from "internal disturbance" to "armed rebellion" for National Emergency.
●​ Mandatory parliamentary approval within stricter timelines and with higher majorities.
●​ Provision for Lok Sabha to revoke National Emergency.
●​ Protection of Articles 20 and 21 from suspension.
●​ Making the President's satisfaction for President's Rule subject to judicial review.

The Election Commission of India (ECI) is a permanent and independent constitutional body responsible for ensuring free
and fair elections in India. It is considered one of the most crucial institutions for the successful functioning of India's
democracy.

Constitutional Basis and Establishment

●​ The Election Commission was established on January 25, 1950, a day now celebrated as National Voters' Day.
●​ It derives its powers and functions primarily from Part XV (Articles 324 to 329) of the Constitution of India.
●​ Article 324 specifically vests the superintendence, direction, and control of elections in the Election Commission.

Composition

●​ Initially, the ECI was a single-member body consisting only of the Chief Election Commissioner (CEC).
●​ In 1989, two additional Election Commissioners (ECs) were appointed, making it a multi-member body. This was in
response to the reduction of the voting age from 21 to 18 years, which significantly increased the workload.
●​ Though briefly reverted to a single-member body in 1990, it was permanently made a three-member body in 1993.
●​ Currently, the ECI consists of:
○​ The Chief Election Commissioner (CEC)
○​ Two Election Commissioners (ECs)

As of June 7, 2025, the Hon'ble Commission comprises:

●​ Shri Gyanesh Kumar (Chief Election Commissioner)

 32

●​ Dr. Sukhbir Singh Sandhu (Election Commissioner)

●​ Dr. Vivek Joshi (Election Commissioner)

Appointment and Tenure

●​ The President of India appoints the Chief Election Commissioner and other Election Commissioners.
●​ Recently, the Chief Election Commissioner and other Election Commissioners (Appointment, Conditions of
Service and Term of Office) Act, 2023, changed the appointment process. Under this Act, a Selection Committee
recommends eligible candidates to the President. This committee is headed by the Prime Minister (Chairperson),
includes the Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha (Member), and a Union Cabinet Minister nominated by the
Prime Minister (Member). This replaced the earlier system where the President appointed them on the advice of the
Prime Minister, and a Supreme Court judgment in 2023 had briefly advocated for a collegium including the Chief
Justice of India until Parliament enacted a law.
●​ They hold office for a term of six years or until they attain the age of 65 years, whichever is earlier.
●​ Their salary and service conditions are similar to those of a Judge of the Supreme Court of India.

Removal

●​ The Chief Election Commissioner can be removed from office in the same manner and on the same grounds as
a Judge of the Supreme Court. This requires a resolution passed by both Houses of Parliament with a special
majority. This difficult removal process provides security of tenure and independence.
●​ Other Election Commissioners can be removed by the President on the recommendation of the Chief Election
Commissioner. This distinction in removal procedure has been a subject of debate regarding the equal status of all
three commissioners.

Independence of the ECI

The Constitution ensures the independence of the ECI through:

●​ Security of Tenure: CEC can only be removed by a special parliamentary procedure.

●​ Conditions of Service: Cannot be varied to his disadvantage after appointment.
●​ Independence of ECs: Other ECs cannot be removed except on the recommendation of the CEC.
●​ Expenditure charged on Consolidated Fund: The administrative expenses of the Election Commission, including
salaries, allowances, and pensions, are charged upon the Consolidated Fund of India, making them non-votable by
Parliament.

Powers and Functions

The ECI has vast powers and functions categorized as administrative, advisory, and quasi-judicial:

1.​ Administrative Functions:​

○​ Preparation and revision of electoral rolls: Registering eligible voters and issuing Electors Photo Identity
Cards (EPIC).
○​ Delimitation of Constituencies: Determining the territorial areas of electoral constituencies throughout
the country based on the Delimitation Commission Act.
○​ Notifying election schedules: Announcing the dates and schedules for general elections, bye-elections,
and staggered polling.
○​ Scrutiny of nomination papers: Examining the validity of candidates' nomination forms.
○​ Granting recognition to political parties: Registering political parties and classifying them as national or
state parties based on their poll performance.
○​ Allotting election symbols: Assigning unique symbols to recognized political parties and independent
candidates.
○​ Determining the Model Code of Conduct (MCC): Laying down guidelines for political parties and
candidates to ensure ethical campaigning and fair practices.
○​ Cancelling polls: If malpractices like booth capturing, rigging, or violence are detected, the ECI can annul
elections and order re-elections.
○​ Appointing election machinery: Appointing Chief Electoral Officers (CEOs) at the state level, District
Election Officers (DEOs), Returning Officers (ROs), Presiding Officers (POs), and other staff required for
election duty.
○​ Monitoring election expenditure: Setting limits on campaign expenditure for candidates and parties, and
monitoring their accounts.
 33

○​ Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs) and VVPATs: Introduction and management of EVMs and Voter
Verifiable Paper Audit Trail (VVPAT) units to enhance transparency and accuracy.
2.​ Advisory Functions:​

○​ Advising the President: On matters concerning the disqualification of Members of Parliament (MPs).
○​ Advising the Governor: On matters concerning the disqualification of Members of State Legislatures
(MLAs).
○​ Advising the President on President's Rule: Whether elections can be held in a state that is under
President's Rule to extend its period beyond one year.
3.​ Quasi-Judicial Functions:​

○​ Settling disputes: Acting as a court for settling disputes related to the granting of recognition to political
parties and the allotment of election symbols.
○​ Inquiring into disputes: Appointing officers to inquire into disputes concerning electoral arrangements.
○​ Disqualifying candidates: Empowered to disqualify candidates who fail to lodge their election expenses
within the prescribed time and manner, or for other violations of election law.

Elections Conducted by ECI

The Election Commission of India is responsible for conducting elections to:

●​ Parliament (Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha)

●​ State Legislative Assemblies
●​ Offices of the President of India
●​ Offices of the Vice-President of India

Note: The ECI is NOT concerned with conducting elections to Panchayats and Municipalities in the States. For this purpose,
the Constitution provides for a separate State Election Commission in each State.

Significance of the Election Commission

The ECI has played a pivotal role in strengthening India's democratic foundations. Its independent and impartial functioning has
ensured:

●​ Free and Fair Elections: Maintaining the integrity of the electoral process.
●​ Credibility: Building public trust in the election outcomes.
●​ Accountability: Holding political parties and candidates accountable to electoral laws and the Model Code of
Conduct.
●​ Voter Participation: Implementing initiatives to increase voter registration and participation.
●​ Technological Advancements: Embracing EVMs, VVPATs, and online platforms to make elections more efficient
and accessible.

The concept of Freedom of Trade, Commerce, and Intercourse is a fundamental principle in India's federal structure,
enshrined in Part XIII (Articles 301 to 307) of the Constitution. Its primary objective is to foster economic unity and integrate
India into a single economic entity by removing internal barriers to the free flow of goods, services, and persons across state
boundaries.

Article 301: The General Rule

Article 301 states: "Subject to the other provisions of this Part, trade, commerce and intercourse throughout the territory of
India shall be free."

●​ Meaning of "Free": The term "free" here does not mean absolute freedom or the absence of any regulation
whatsoever. Instead, it signifies freedom from all financial and non-financial barriers that directly and immediately
obstruct the free flow of trade, commerce, and intercourse. It implies that there should be no arbitrary or
discriminatory restrictions.
●​ "Trade": Generally refers to buying and selling activities, including manufacturing and related processes, with a profit
motive.
●​ "Commerce": Encompasses a broader range of activities related to trade, including transportation (by land, water,
air), communication, and other means of transmission, irrespective of profit.
 34

●​ "Intercourse": This term has the widest connotation. While it includes commercial intercourse (movement of goods
and services for trade and commerce), courts have generally interpreted it in a commercial context, not necessarily
extending to mere social movement. It implies the free movement of persons for commercial purposes.
●​ Throughout the Territory of India: This freedom applies to both inter-state (between states) and intra-state (within
a state) trade, commerce, and intercourse.

Object and Purpose of Part XIII

The framers of the Constitution, having witnessed the existence of internal customs barriers and disparate trade practices in
British India and princely states, sought to create a unified economic space. The objectives of these provisions are:

●​ To promote the economic unity of India.

●​ To ensure a national economic fabric free from regional protectionism or discriminatory trade policies.
●​ To prevent states from erecting trade barriers that could hinder national economic growth and integration.
●​ To facilitate the free flow of goods, services, and capital across the country.

Restrictions on Freedom of Trade, Commerce, and Intercourse

While Article 301 declares the general principle of freedom, this freedom is not absolute. Articles 302 to 305 provide for
exceptions and allow for the imposition of reasonable restrictions in the public interest. This ensures a balance between
economic freedom and the need for government regulation.

1. Power of Parliament to Impose Restrictions (Article 302)

●​ Article 302 states: "Parliament may by law impose such restrictions on the freedom of trade, commerce or
intercourse between one State and another or within any part of the territory of India as may be required in the public
interest."
●​ Conditions:
○​ The restriction must be imposed by a law made by Parliament.
○​ It must be in the public interest.
○​ It applies to both inter-state and intra-state trade.
●​ Purpose: This power enables the Union government to regulate trade to achieve national objectives like public
health, national security, equitable distribution of essential commodities, or managing economic crises.

2. Restrictions on Legislative Powers of Union and States (Article 303)

●​ Article 303(1): Prohibition of Discrimination: "Neither Parliament nor the Legislature of a State shall have power to
make any law giving, or authorising the giving of, any preference to one State over another, or making, or authorising
the making of, any discrimination between one State and another, by virtue of any entry relating to trade and
commerce in any of the Lists in the Seventh Schedule."
○​ This is a crucial anti-discrimination clause. It prevents both the Parliament and State Legislatures from
enacting laws that favor one state or discriminate against another in matters of trade and commerce.
●​ Article 303(2): Exception for Scarcity: "Nothing in clause (1) shall prevent Parliament from making any law
imposing such prohibitions or restrictions on the freedom of trade, commerce and intercourse as may be required in
the public interest by reason of any scarcity of goods in any part of the territory of India."
○​ This is the only exception to the non-discrimination rule for Parliament. In situations of scarcity of goods
in any part of India, Parliament can make laws that might appear discriminatory but are necessary to
address the shortage in the public interest.

3. Restrictions by States (Article 304)

This Article empowers State Legislatures to impose certain restrictions on trade, commerce, and intercourse.

●​ Article 304(a): Non-discriminatory Taxes: "The Legislature of a State may by law— (a) impose on goods imported
from other States or the Union territories any tax to which similar goods manufactured or produced in that State are
subject, so, however, as not to discriminate between goods so imported and goods so manufactured or produced;"
○​ This allows states to levy taxes on goods coming from other states, provided that similar goods produced
within that state are subject to the same tax. This ensures that states don't use taxation to create
internal trade barriers against goods from other states. The tax must be non-discriminatory.
●​ Article 304(b): Reasonable Restrictions in Public Interest (with President's Sanction): "(b) impose such
reasonable restrictions on the freedom of trade, commerce or intercourse with or within that State as may be required
in the public interest: Provided that no Bill or amendment for the purposes of clause (b) shall be introduced or moved
in the Legislature of a State without the previous sanction of the President."
○​ A State Legislature can impose reasonable restrictions on the freedom of trade in the public interest.
 35

○​ Crucially, any such Bill or amendment requires the previous sanction of the President before it can be
introduced in the State Legislature. This acts as a check to ensure that state laws do not unduly impede
national economic unity.

4. Saving of Existing Laws and State Monopolies (Article 305)

●​ This Article saves existing laws that provided for state monopolies or any law providing for the carrying on by the
State, or by a corporation owned or controlled by the State, of any trade, business, industry, or service, whether to the
exclusion, complete or partial, of citizens or otherwise.
●​ It ensures that existing state monopolies (e.g., in liquor trade, electricity boards) and new laws creating such
monopolies are not struck down merely for violating Article 301.

5. Appointment of Authority for Trade and Commerce (Article 307)

●​ Parliament can by law appoint such authority as it considers appropriate for carrying out the purposes of Articles 301,
302, 303, and 304.
●​ So far, no such permanent authority has been established.

Activities Not Protected by Article 301

The freedom guaranteed by Article 301 does not extend to all activities. The Supreme Court has held that certain activities are
not "trade" or "commerce" in the constitutional sense and thus are not protected:

●​ Illegal activities: Such as gambling, prostitution, smuggling, or trafficking in drugs/contraband. (e.g., State of
Bombay v. R.M.D. Chamarbaugwala, 1957, regarding lotteries and gambling).
●​ Harmful or noxious activities: Activities that are inherently injurious to public health, safety, or morality are not
considered "trade" or "commerce" for the purpose of Article 301.

Key Judicial Interpretations (Landmark Cases)

The Supreme Court has played a crucial role in interpreting and defining the scope of "freedom of trade, commerce, and
intercourse":

1.​ Atiabari Tea Co. Ltd. v. State of Assam (1961):

○​ Principle: The Court held that Article 301 guarantees freedom from all financial and non-financial barriers
that directly and immediately obstruct the free movement of goods. Taxes that directly and immediately
affect the free flow of trade would violate Article 301.
○​ Impact: This case established the "direct and immediate effect" test. If a law, including a tax law, directly
and immediately hinders the flow of trade, it would fall foul of Article 301 unless saved by other provisions.
2.​ Automobile Transport (Rajasthan) Ltd. v. State of Rajasthan (1962):
○​ Principle: This case refined the "direct and immediate effect" test by introducing the concept of
"compensatory and regulatory taxes/measures." The Court held that purely regulatory or compensatory
taxes/measures that facilitate trade and commerce (e.g., road taxes for road maintenance, license fees for
regulation) do not violate Article 301, even if they have an indirect effect on trade. Such measures are
outside the purview of Article 301.
○​ Impact: This judgment provided a crucial distinction between restrictive barriers and necessary
regulatory/compensatory measures, thereby preventing the invalidation of legitimate state taxes and
regulations essential for infrastructure and administration.
3.​ G.K. Krishna v. State of Tamil Nadu (1975):
○​ The court reiterated that regulatory measures, even if they impose a financial burden, are not hit by Article
301 if they are compensatory in nature and facilitate trade.
4.​ Jindal Stainless Ltd. v. State of Haryana (2016):
○​ A nine-judge bench revisited the principles, particularly concerning Entry Tax. It clarified that for a tax under
Article 304(a) to be valid, it must be non-discriminatory (tax on imported goods must be similar to tax on
locally produced goods) and compensatory in nature, linked to services provided by the state to facilitate
trade. If the tax burden is demonstrably higher on imported goods without corresponding benefits, it could
be deemed discriminatory and violative.

Civil servants, in the context of the Indian administrative system, refer to the permanent professional branch of the executive
government, also known as the public services or bureaucracy. They are distinct from political executives (ministers) who are
temporary and change with governments. Civil servants are the backbone of administration, responsible for implementing
government policies, managing public resources, and providing public services.
 36

Their position, conditions of service, and certain protections are primarily enshrined in Part XIV (Articles 308 to 323) of the
Indian Constitution, specifically dealing with "Services under the Union and the States."

Key Characteristics of Civil Servants in India:

1.​ Permanence: Unlike political executives, civil servants have a permanent tenure (until retirement age or removal for
specific reasons). This ensures continuity of administration regardless of changes in the ruling political party.
2.​ Professionalism: They are recruited based on merit (through competitive examinations) and possess specialized
knowledge and skills relevant to public administration. They are expected to perform their duties efficiently and
impartially.
3.​ Neutrality: Civil servants are expected to be politically neutral, meaning they serve the government of the day
without personal political bias. Their allegiance is to the Constitution and the law, not to a particular political party.
4.​ Anonymity: They are generally expected to remain anonymous, with ministers taking credit or blame for policies and
actions.
5.​ Hierarchy: The civil service is structured hierarchically, with clear lines of authority and responsibility.
6.​ Public Service Ethos: They are expected to uphold a high standard of ethics, integrity, and dedication to public
service.

Constitutional Provisions for Civil Servants:

1.​ Recruitment and Conditions of Service (Articles 309):​

○​ Parliament can regulate the recruitment and conditions of service of persons appointed to public services
and posts in connection with the affairs of the Union.
○​ Similarly, the Legislature of a State can make laws for its state services.
○​ In the absence of such laws, the President (for Union services) or the Governor (for State services) can
make rules regarding recruitment and conditions of service.
2.​ Doctrine of Pleasure (Article 310):​

○​ Article 310(1) states that "every person who is a member of a defence service or of a civil service of the
Union or of an all-India service or holds any post connected with defence or any civil post under the Union,
shall hold office during the pleasure of the President, and every person who is a member of a civil service
of a State or holds any civil post under a State shall hold office during the pleasure of the Governor of the
State."
○​ This means that in theory, a civil servant holds office at the pleasure of the President or Governor and can
be dismissed at any time.
○​ However, this doctrine is NOT absolute in India and is significantly curtailed by Article 311.
3.​ Safeguards to Civil Servants (Article 311):​

○​ Article 311 provides two crucial safeguards to civil servants against arbitrary dismissal, removal, or
reduction in rank:
■​ Article 311(1): No Dismissal by Subordinate Authority: A civil servant cannot be dismissed or
removed by an authority subordinate to that by which he was appointed. This ensures that the
dismissing authority is of at least the same rank as the appointing authority.
■​ Article 311(2): Right to a Reasonable Opportunity of Being Heard: No civil servant shall be
dismissed, removed, or reduced in rank except after an inquiry in which he has been informed of
the charges against him and given a reasonable opportunity of being heard in respect of those
charges. This embodies the principles of natural justice.
○​ Exceptions to Article 311(2): The inquiry and opportunity to be heard are not required in three specific
cases:
■​ When a person is dismissed/removed/reduced in rank based on conduct that led to his
conviction on a criminal charge.
■​ When the authority is satisfied that it is not reasonably practicable to hold such an inquiry
(reasons must be recorded in writing).
■​ When the President or Governor is satisfied that it is not expedient to hold such an inquiry in the
interest of the security of the State.
4.​ All-India Services (Article 312):​

○​ Parliament has the power to create All-India Services common to both the Union and the States (e.g.,
Indian Administrative Service - IAS, Indian Police Service - IPS, Indian Forest Service - IFS).
○​ These officers are recruited and trained by the Union government but serve in State cadres. They play a
vital role in integrating the administration across the country and ensuring a uniform standard of public
service.
5.​ Public Service Commissions (Articles 315-323):​
 37

○​ The Constitution provides for a Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) for the Union and a State
Public Service Commission (SPSC) for each State.
○​ Their primary functions are:
■​ Conducting examinations for appointments to the services of the Union/State.
■​ Advising the President/Governor on all matters relating to methods of recruitment, principles to
be followed in making appointments, promotions, transfers, and disciplinary matters.
○​ The independence of these Commissions is ensured by constitutional provisions regarding their
appointment, removal, and conditions of service.

Role of Civil Servants in Governance:

1.​ Policy Implementation: They are responsible for translating the policies framed by the political executive into
concrete action and delivering public services.
2.​ Administration and Management: They manage various government departments, public sector undertakings, and
regulatory bodies.
3.​ Advice to Political Executive: Being experts in administration and ground realities, they provide valuable advice
and inputs to ministers in policy formulation.
4.​ Continuity and Stability: They ensure continuity in administration when governments change, providing stability to
the governance system.
5.​ Law and Order: Key civil service roles like District Magistrates (DM) and Superintendents of Police (SP) are crucial
for maintaining law and order.
6.​ Development and Welfare: They are instrumental in planning and executing various development and welfare
programs across sectors like health, education, infrastructure, and poverty alleviation.
7.​ Financial Management: They are involved in budgeting, expenditure control, and ensuring financial accountability.

Challenges Faced by Civil Services:

●​ Political Interference: Undue interference from political executives can compromise their impartiality and efficiency.
●​ Corruption: Like any large bureaucracy, they are susceptible to corruption, which undermines public trust.
●​ Lack of Accountability: Sometimes, the complex hierarchical structure and the protection offered by Article 311 can
make accountability difficult to establish.
●​ Resistance to Change: Bureaucracies can sometimes be rigid and resistant to adopting new methods or
technologies.
●​ Maintaining Neutrality: Balancing political neutrality with the need to implement the agenda of the elected
government can be challenging.

"Service Tribunals," in the Indian context, primarily refer to Administrative Tribunals established under Part XIV-A (Articles
323A and 323B) of the Indian Constitution. These tribunals are specialized quasi-judicial bodies created to adjudicate disputes
and complaints regarding the recruitment and conditions of service of persons appointed to public services and posts.

The main objective behind establishing these tribunals is to reduce the burden on High Courts and the Supreme Court, provide
speedy and inexpensive justice to government employees, and ensure specialized handling of service-related matters.

Constitutional Basis:

●​ 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1976: This amendment introduced a new Part XIV-A to the Constitution,
titled "Tribunals."
○​ Article 323A: Empowers Parliament to make a law for the establishment of Administrative Tribunals for
the adjudication of disputes and complaints relating to recruitment and conditions of service of persons
appointed to public services of the Union, the States, local bodies, public corporations, and other public
authorities. It explicitly states that such a law may exclude the jurisdiction of all courts (except the Supreme
Court under Article 136) with respect to such disputes.
○​ Article 323B: Enables both Parliament and State Legislatures to establish tribunals for other matters (e.g.,
taxation, land reforms, foreign exchange, elections) but with some differences in scope and exclusions of
court jurisdiction.

The Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985:

In pursuance of Article 323A, Parliament enacted the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985. This Act provides for the
establishment of:
 38

1.​ Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT)

2.​ State Administrative Tribunals (SATs)
3.​ Joint Administrative Tribunals (JATs) (for two or more states)

1. Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT)

●​ Establishment: The CAT was established in 1985. Its Principal Bench is located in New Delhi, and it has numerous
Benches across India, often corresponding to the seats of High Courts.
●​ Jurisdiction: The CAT exercises original jurisdiction in relation to service matters concerning:
○​ Members of the All-India Services (IAS, IPS, IFS).
○​ Persons appointed to any civil service of the Union or any civil post under the Union.
○​ Civilians appointed to any defence services or posts connected with defence (excluding members of the
armed forces themselves).
○​ Employees of certain Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs) or other public sector organizations notified by
the government.
●​ Exclusions: The Act specifically excludes members of the naval, military, and air forces, officers and servants of the
Supreme Court or High Courts, and the secretarial staff of Parliament/State Legislatures from its purview.
●​ Composition: A CAT Bench typically consists of a Judicial Member and an Administrative Member. The
Chairman is usually a retired High Court Judge or has held a similar position. Members are drawn from both judicial
and administrative streams to bring expertise from both domains. They are appointed by the President.
●​ Powers and Procedure:
○​ The CAT has the same powers as a civil court under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, with respect to
matters like summoning witnesses, receiving evidence, requisitioning public records, etc.
○​ It is not bound by the strict rules of procedure laid down in the Civil Procedure Code but is guided by
the principles of natural justice.
○​ It can exercise powers and authority similar to those of a High Court in service matters, including the power
to punish for its own contempt.
●​ Appeals:
○​ Originally, appeals against CAT orders could only be made directly to the Supreme Court (as per Article
323A's intent).
○​ However, in the landmark L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India (1997) case, the Supreme Court declared
that the power of judicial review of the High Courts under Articles 226 and 227 and that of the Supreme
Court under Article 32 is an integral and essential feature of the Constitution (basic structure).
○​ Therefore, the Supreme Court held that appeals against the orders of Administrative Tribunals (CAT or
SATs) should lie first before a Division Bench of the concerned High Court and only thereafter to the
Supreme Court. This restored the supervisory jurisdiction of the High Courts over these tribunals.

2. State Administrative Tribunals (SATs)

●​ Establishment: The Central Government is empowered to establish State Administrative Tribunals (SATs) at the
specific request of the concerned State Governments.
●​ Jurisdiction: Like the CAT, SATs exercise original jurisdiction over recruitment and all service matters concerning
employees of the respective State Government, local authorities, and public corporations within that State.
●​ Composition, Powers, and Procedures: These are largely similar to those of the CAT, with the Chairman, Judicial,
and Administrative Members being appointed by the President in consultation with the Governor of the concerned
State.
●​ Appeals: Appeals against SAT orders also lie before a Division Bench of the concerned State High Court, as per the
L. Chandra Kumar judgment.

3. Joint Administrative Tribunals (JATs)

●​ The Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, also provides for the establishment of a Joint Administrative Tribunal (JAT)
for two or more States, if requested by the concerned State Governments. Its jurisdiction and powers are similar to
those of a SAT for the States it serves.

Rationale and Advantages of Service Tribunals:

●​ Specialization: Tribunals consist of members with specialized knowledge of service laws and administrative matters,
leading to quicker and more informed decisions.
●​ Speedy Justice: They aim to provide quicker resolution of service disputes compared to the regular courts, which
often have a heavy backlog.
●​ Reduced Burden on Courts: They alleviate the workload of High Courts, allowing them to focus on other
constitutional and legal matters.
●​ Cost-Effective: The procedures are generally simpler and less expensive than traditional court litigation.
 39

●​ Informal Procedure: Being guided by natural justice principles rather than strict procedural codes, they can be more
flexible.

Criticisms and Challenges:

●​ Lack of Uniformity: Not all states have established SATs, leading to disparities in the redressal mechanism for state
government employees.
●​ Executive Influence: Concerns are sometimes raised about the independence and impartiality of tribunals,
particularly regarding the appointment process of administrative members and their potential for executive influence.
●​ Quality of Justice: Despite the goal of specialization, the quality of judicial pronouncements can sometimes be a
concern compared to High Courts.
●​ Bureaucratic Delays: While designed for speed, some tribunals still face challenges of backlog and delays.
●​ Accessibility: Not all regions have benches, which can still pose accessibility issues for employees in remote areas.

Amendment of the Constitution: The Process and Its Types

The Indian Constitution is designed to be both rigid and flexible, allowing for necessary changes to adapt to new
socio-economic and political realities while simultaneously protecting its fundamental principles. Article 368 in Part XX of the
Constitution specifically deals with the power of Parliament to amend the Constitution and the procedure required for such
amendments.

Article 368(1) states: "Notwithstanding anything in this Constitution, Parliament may in exercise of its constituent power amend
by way of addition, variation or repeal any provision of this Constitution in accordance with the procedure laid down in this
article."

This clause clarifies that Parliament's power to amend is its 'constituent power,' meaning it's a power to change the very fabric
of the Constitution, not just an ordinary legislative power.

The Procedure for Amendment (as per Article 368):

1.​ Initiation: An amendment of the Constitution can be initiated only by the introduction of a Bill for the purpose in
either House of Parliament (Lok Sabha or Rajya Sabha).
○​ It cannot be initiated in a State Legislature.
○​ The Bill can be introduced either by a Minister (a government bill) or by a private member (a
non-ministerial member of Parliament).
○​ No prior recommendation of the President is required to introduce the Bill.
2.​ Passage in Each House: The Bill must be passed in each House of Parliament by a special majority. This means:
○​ A majority of the total membership of that House (i.e., more than 50% of the total strength of the House,
irrespective of vacancies or absenteeism).
○​ AND a majority of not less than two-thirds of the members of that House present and voting.
○​ Each House must pass the Bill separately. There is no provision for a joint sitting of both Houses to resolve
a deadlock over an amendment bill.
3.​ Presidential Assent: After the Bill is passed by both Houses, it is presented to the President for his assent.
○​ The 24th Constitutional Amendment Act of 1971 made it obligatory for the President to give his assent
to a Constitution Amendment Bill. He cannot withhold his assent or return the Bill for reconsideration.
This ensures that the President cannot become a hurdle in the amendment process once Parliament has
approved it.
4.​ Enactment: After the President's assent, the Bill becomes an Act, and the Constitution stands amended in
accordance with its terms.

Types of Amendments (Based on Procedure):

While Article 368 outlines the primary amendment procedure, the Indian Constitution actually provides for three ways to amend
its provisions:

1.​ Amendment by Simple Majority:

○​ These amendments are outside the scope of Article 368. They are considered ordinary laws and can be
passed by a simple majority of members present and voting in each House of Parliament (i.e., more than
50% of those present and voting).
○​ Examples: Admission or establishment of new states (Art. 2), formation of new states and alteration of
areas, boundaries, or names of existing states (Art. 3), abolition or creation of Legislative Councils in states
(Art. 169), changes in citizenship rules, determination of salaries and allowances of members of Parliament
 40

and ministers, rules of procedure in Parliament, number of puisne judges in the Supreme Court, use of
English language in Parliament, etc.
2.​ Amendment by Special Majority (as per Article 368):
○​ This is the most common method of amendment and applies to the majority of the Constitution's provisions.
○​ It requires the special majority (majority of total membership + 2/3rd majority of present and voting) in each
House, as described above.
○​ Examples: Fundamental Rights, Directive Principles of State Policy, provisions related to the structure and
powers of the Supreme Court and High Courts (unless they affect the federal structure).
3.​ Amendment by Special Majority and Ratification by States (as per Article 368):
○​ This method is used for amending those provisions that relate to the federal structure of the Constitution.
Such amendments require:
■​ A special majority in both Houses of Parliament.
■​ AND ratification by the Legislatures of not less than one-half of the States by a simple
majority.
○​ Examples: Election of the President and its manner, extent of the executive power of the Union and the
States, distribution of legislative powers between the Union and the States, any of the Lists in the Seventh
Schedule, representation of States in Parliament, and the provisions of Article 368 itself.
○​ The Constitution does not specify a time limit within which the states must ratify the amendment.

The Doctrine of Basic Structure: The Guardian of the Constitution

Despite Parliament's extensive power to amend the Constitution, this power is not absolute. The Doctrine of Basic Structure
is a unique judicial innovation that acts as a fundamental limitation on Parliament's constituent power. It asserts that there are
certain fundamental features of the Constitution that cannot be altered, abrogated, or destroyed by Parliament through an
amendment under Article 368.

Evolution of the Doctrine:

1.​ Early Years: The 'Unlimited' Power (Shankari Prasad & Sajjan Singh):
○​ Shankari Prasad v. Union of India (1951): The Supreme Court held that Parliament's power to amend
under Article 368 included the power to amend Fundamental Rights. It stated that 'law' in Article 13 (which
voids laws inconsistent with FRs) only referred to ordinary laws, not constitutional amendments. This
implied an almost unfettered amending power.
○​ Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan (1965): The Court largely reaffirmed Shankari Prasad. However,
Justice Mudholkar, in his dissenting opinion, for the first time, hinted at the idea that the Constitution might
have certain "basic features" that cannot be changed.
2.​ The Confrontation (Golaknath):
○​ Golaknath v. State of Punjab (1967): In a significant shift, the Supreme Court, by a 6:5 majority, held that
Fundamental Rights were "transcendental and inalienable" and could not be amended by Parliament. It
declared that an amendment under Article 368 was also a "law" within the meaning of Article 13 and thus
subject to judicial review. This led to a direct conflict between the judiciary and Parliament.
3.​ Parliament's Reaction:
○​ To overcome the Golaknath judgment, Parliament enacted several amendments, notably the 24th
Constitutional Amendment Act, 1971. This amendment explicitly declared that Parliament has the power
to amend any part of the Constitution (including Fundamental Rights) and that such an amendment would
not be considered "law" under Article 13. It also made it obligatory for the President to assent to an
amendment bill.
4.​ The Watershed Moment (Kesavananda Bharati):
○​ Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973): This is the most celebrated and pivotal case in Indian
constitutional law. A 13-judge bench of the Supreme Court, by a narrow 7:6 majority, delivered a nuanced
verdict:
■​ It reversed the Golaknath judgment, upholding Parliament's power to amend any part of the
Constitution, including Fundamental Rights (thus upholding the 24th Amendment's validity in
parts).
■​ Simultaneously, and most importantly, it held that this power is not absolute and is subject to
"implied limitations." Parliament cannot alter, abrogate, or destroy the "basic structure" or
"framework" of the Constitution.
■​ The Court famously articulated: "The power to amend is not a power to destroy." Parliament
can amend to evolve the Constitution, but it cannot fundamentally rewrite or dismantle its core
identity.
■​ The Court did not provide an exhaustive list of what constitutes the "basic structure," stating it
would be decided on a case-by-case basis. However, it suggested some elements that could be
considered part of the basic structure:
■​ Supremacy of the Constitution
■​ Republican and Democratic form of Government
 41

■​ Secular character of the Constitution

■​ Separation of Powers between the legislative, executive, and judiciary
■​ Federal character of the Constitution
■​ Unity and integrity of the Nation
■​ Sovereignty of India
■​ Judicial Review
■​ Harmony and balance between Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles
■​ Parliamentary system of government
■​ Rule of law
■​ Free and fair elections

Does it Restrict the Power of Parliament to Amend the Constitution?

Yes, unequivocally. The Basic Structure Doctrine is the single most significant judicial restriction on the Parliament's power to
amend the Constitution.

●​ Before Kesavananda Bharati, Parliament believed its amending power under Article 368 was plenary (absolute).
●​ The doctrine established that Parliament, despite having the power to amend, cannot use that power to change the
fundamental identity or the foundational principles upon which the Constitution is built.
●​ This means Parliament cannot:
○​ Abolish democracy and establish a dictatorship.
○​ Dismantle the federal structure and make India a completely unitary state.
○​ Eliminate judicial review, thereby making legislative actions immune from constitutional scrutiny.
○​ Remove the secular character of the state.

The judiciary, particularly the Supreme Court, acts as the ultimate interpreter and guardian of the Constitution. It has the power
to review any constitutional amendment to determine if it violates the basic structure. If an amendment is found to violate the
basic structure, it can be declared unconstitutional and void.

Subsequent Landmark Cases Reaffirming and Expanding the Basic Structure Doctrine:

1.​ Indira Gandhi v. Raj Narain (1975) - The Election Case:

○​ Background: The 39th Constitutional Amendment Act, 1975, placed the election of the Prime Minister,
Speaker, and President beyond the scrutiny of any court.
○​ Judgment: The Supreme Court, relying on the Basic Structure Doctrine, struck down the specific clause
(Article 329A (4)). It held that free and fair elections and the rule of law are essential components of the
basic structure. This case solidified the doctrine immediately after its inception.
2.​ Minerva Mills Ltd. v. Union of India (1980):
○​ Background: The 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1976 (the "Mini-Constitution" during Emergency),
inserted a clause stating there would be no limitation on Parliament's power to amend the Constitution. It
also gave precedence to all Directive Principles over Fundamental Rights.
○​ Judgment: The Supreme Court struck down these provisions. It emphatically stated that the limited
power of Parliament to amend the Constitution is itself a basic feature of the Constitution. Parliament
cannot convert its limited amending power into an absolute one. It also reinforced that the harmony and
balance between Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles is an essential feature of the basic
structure.
3.​ Waman Rao v. Union of India (1981):
○​ This case provided clarity on the application of the doctrine, holding that the Basic Structure Doctrine would
apply to all constitutional amendments made after April 24, 1973 (the date of the Kesavananda Bharati
judgment).
4.​ S.R. Bommai v. Union of India (1994):
○​ While primarily about President's Rule (Article 356), this case significantly expanded the list of basic
features. The Court held that federalism, secularism, democracy, and the unity and integrity of the
nation are basic features and cannot be abrogated by Parliament.
5.​ I.R. Coelho v. State of Tamil Nadu (2007):
○​ This judgment firmly established that all laws placed in the Ninth Schedule (which historically aimed to
immunize laws from judicial review) after April 24, 1973, would be subject to judicial review on the ground
of violating the basic structure of the Constitution. This solidified the supremacy of the basic structure
doctrine even over the Ninth Schedule's protective umbrella.
42