0% found this document useful (0 votes)
8 views30 pages

Research Methodology & Proposal Writing

Uploaded by

Bolu Adediran
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
8 views30 pages

Research Methodology & Proposal Writing

Uploaded by

Bolu Adediran
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

BAS 301:

Research Methodology & Proposal


Writing
Taiwo C. OMOTORIOGUN, PhD

Contact
[Link]@[Link]
 What is research?
 The systematic investigation into the study of
materials, sources, phenomena, etc. in order to
establish facts and reach new conclusions.

 What is a proposal
 A document that outline a research problem; its associated
research questions, prior literature related to the area; and
the procedure to answering the research questions.

 Centered around: what, why and how?


 Components of research proposal
 Research objectives
 Specific things you want to achieve in your research

 Clearly formulated objectives help to:


 Research

 Literature review 3-5 objectives


 Guild your research design

 methodology

 The sections in proposals


must be connected
 Examples of objectives
 To identify bacteria present on the surface of cell phones (MCB)
 To assess the levels of pesticides in the rice from Ladi farms (EMT)
 To determine the geo-electric parameters of the subsurface layers (AGP)
 To determine the prevalence of malaria infection in urban and rural dwellers in
ondo state (MCB)
 To determine the ameliorative effect of lycopene-rich extracts on jaundiced-rats
(BCH)
 To investigate the hepatoprotective roles of kola bark extract on high fat fed wistar
rats (BCH)
 To determine differences in the biogas yield capacity of different biomass (food waste)
(BITECH)
 To Isolate microorganisms that are contaminants of poultry feeds (MCB)
 Examples of objectives
 Determine abundance, density and diversity of large mammals on
wetlands;

 Determine effect of wetland size on abundance, density and


diversity of large mammals in wetlands;

 Determine effect of time of day on abundance, density and


diversity of large mammals in wetlands,

 Determine effect of time of day on modes of wetland utilization


by large mammals
 Examples of objectives
 Determine the breeding time of birds in Elizade University Forest

 Determine the breeding behaviour of birds in relation to sex

 Determine the Sex composition of group size of breeding birds


using molecular methods
Data collection and analysis
400 level projects in view
 Statistics:
 The practice of data collection, organization, analysis,
interpretation and presentation

 Types of Statistics
 Descriptive statistics: frequency, measures of central
tendency and measures of dispersion
 Inferential statistics: chi-square, t-test, ANOVA and so on.

 Why Statistical Analysis?


Processed Data:
Raw Data
Central tendency

Raw data Statistics Variables


wing weight
species age sex wing weight 88.2
vilwe 4 F 83 32.7 Mean 4 36.71
vilwe 6 F 84 32.1 SD 5.19 4.98
vilwe 5 F 86 34 median 86 35.45
vilwe 6 F 81 28.2 Min 81 28
vilwe 4 F 83 35.6 Max 97 46
vilwe 4 M 94 42.6 Kurtosis
vilwe 4 M 93 40.7
vilwe 4 M 95 42.5 Skewness
vilwe 4 M 97 41.1 N = 38
vilwe 4 M 94 39.4
Processed Data:
Raw Data
Graphical representation

Raw data
species age sex wing weight
vilwe 4 F 83 32.7
vilwe 6 F 84 32.1
vilwe 5 F 86 34
vilwe 6 F 81 28.2
vilwe 4 F 83 35.6
vilwe 4 M 94 42.6
vilwe 4 M 93 40.7
vilwe 4 M 95 42.5
vilwe 4 M 97 41.1
vilwe 4 M 94 39.4
Processed Data:
Raw Data Graphical representation

Raw data
species age sex wing weight
vilwe 4 F 83 32.7
vilwe 6 F 84 32.1
vilwe 5 F 86 34
vilwe 6 F 81 28.2
vilwe 4 F 83 35.6
vilwe 4 M 94 42.6
vilwe 4 M 93 40.7
vilwe 4 M 95 42.5
vilwe 4 M 97 41.1
vilwe 4 M 94 39.4
Data distribution
Raw Data Processed Data:
Graphical representation

Raw data
species age sex wing weight Can wing length differ
between ale and female?
vilwe 4 F 83 32.7
vilwe 6 F 84 32.1
vilwe 5 F 86 34
vilwe 6 F 81 28.2
vilwe 4 F 83 35.6
vilwe 4 M 94 42.6
vilwe 4 M 93 40.7
vilwe 4 M 95 42.5 Would body mass be the
same in male and female?
vilwe 4 M 97 41.1
vilwe 4 M 94 39.4

Comparing two groups: same


variable
Processed Data
Raw Data Graphical representation

Raw data
species age sex wing weight
vilwe 4 F 83 32.7
vilwe 6 F 84 32.1
vilwe 5 F 86 34
vilwe 6 F 81 28.2
vilwe 4 F 83 35.6
vilwe 4 M 94 42.6
vilwe 4 M 93 40.7
vilwe 4 M 95 42.5
vilwe 4 M 97 41.1
Pre-insight into correlation
vilwe 4 M 94 39.4
or regression
Categorical variables take on values that
 It is used to test for: are names or labels
 Goodness of fit e.g. race, sex, age group
 Homogeneity of variance
 Degree of independence

 When to use it
 Discrete outcomes (categorical variables)
 Ordinal and Dichotomous variables


=

Where: oi = observed count and


ei = expected count
H0: The distribution of bird species
across five habitat type is independent
of feeding guilds Output:
Number of cases in table:
Habitat types 651
Species agric sava fore wetl urban
Number of factors: 2
Fruigivore 10 30 16 7 14 Test for independence for
Granivore 35 39 40 30 11 all factors:
Carnivore 15 13 25 18 15
Chisq = 55.49, df
Insectivore 34 34 36 21 10
Omnivore 14 19 30 23 12
=20, p-value = 3.473e-05
Nectivore 34 13 16 18 9
H0: The distribution of bird species
across five habitat types is independent
of time of day Output:
Number of cases in table:
Habitat types 1200
Number of factors: 2
Time agric sava fore wetl urban
Test for independence for
ealymorng 60 78 80 45 37
all factors:
latemorn 50 67 69 50 25
afternoo 45 55 70 55 15
Chisq = 15.05, df
earlyeven 48 58 70 40 20
=16, p-value = 0.0213
lateeven 25 40 45 38 15
 Appropriate
for  One sample t-test:
comparing two ̅−
groups =

 Two sample t-test:


 Inappropriatefor
categorical/count
data ̅ − ̅
=

 Sample size (n): n +


≥ 5 or ≤ 30
H0: The wing and weight measurement of
group A is equal to that of groupB at 5%
level

Raw data Output:


speci Mean of wingA = 88.34
es age sex wngA wngB wtA wtA
vilwe 4 F 83 76 32.7 33 Mean of wingB = 85.41
vilwe 6 F 84 60 32.1 32.5 t-value = 1.68
vilwe 5 F 86 89 34 36
p-value = 0.103
vilwe 6 F 81 85 28.2 27.8
vilwe 4 F 83 78 35.6 35.6
vilwe 4 M 87 80 33.6 32.8 Since the p-value >0.05, accept H
vilwe 4 M 95 90 41.5 42.5
vilwe 4 M 95 94 42.1 41.1 wing A = wing B
vilwe 4 M 94 93 39.7 39.4
vilwe 4 M 92 95 40.9 36.2
H0: The wing and weight measurement of
group A is equal to that of groupB at 5%
level

Raw data
Output:
speci
es age sex wngA wngB wtA wtA Mean of weightA = 36.71
vilwe 4 F 83 76 32.7 33 Mean of weighB = 36.45
vilwe 6 F 84 60 32.1 32.5
vilwe 5 F 86 89 34 36 t-value = 0.21
vilwe 6 F 81 85 28.2 27.8 p-value = 0.827
vilwe 4 F 83 78 35.6 35.6
vilwe 4 M 87 80 33.6 32.8
Since the p-value >0.05, accept H0
vilwe 4 M 95 90 41.5 42.5
vilwe 4 M 95 94 42.1 41.1 weight A = weight B
vilwe 4 M 94 93 39.7 39.4
vilwe 4 M 92 95 40.9 36.2
 To investigate whether the mean of numeric
variables differs significantly between groups and to
quantify the difference (Kopp, 2016).

 Appropriate for comparing three or more groups

 Assumptions of ANOVA:
 Additivity
 Error: ~Ν , . Only valid when observation
follows the normal distribution
 Assessing Normality
 QQ Plots
 Shapiro-Wilk test

 Accounting for non-


normality
 Transformation
 Kruskal-Wallistest
 Ignore the non-
normality
 Assumption of  Assumption of
Independence Constant variance
 Repeated measurement  Bartlett’s test
 Similar materials for  Levene test
Treatment A and B
 Hierarchical data
 Accounting for
Unequal variances
 Accounting for  Transformation
Independence  Robust method: Bruner-
 No formal test Dette-Munk
 Mixed-effect analysis
 Repeated measures
analysis
NOT NORMALLY DISTRIBUTED DATA
Metals in feathers
SPECIES Fe Pb Cu Zn Cd Cr Ni
OLISU 326.667 93.333 13.333 6.667 NA 39.13 20
OLISU 278.261 67.391 2.174 19.565 NA NA 8.163
OLISU 71.429 67.857 2.041 50 NA NA NA
OLISU 16.327 18.367 21.622 12.245 NA NA NA
OLISU 40.541 29.73 NA 48.649 NA NA NA
LITGR 61.739 14.783 3.478 20 NA 5.645 10.435
LITGR 33.597 8.3 2.372 9.486 NA NA 9.881
LITGR 102.419 13.71 0.806 4.839 NA NA NA
LITGR 7.983 1.681 0.84 5.882 NA NA NA
LITGR 0.42 2.101 0.21 2.311 NA NA NA
WESBL 1128.571 314.286 71.429 357.143 NA 28.571 342.857
WESBL 14.216 10.294 0.49 5.882 NA NA NA
WESBL NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
 KRUSKAL-WALIS TEST
 Not normally distributed data

Kruskal-Wallis
Fe Pb Cu Zn Cd Cr Ni
H
F
P

One way anova


Fe Pb Cu Zn Cd Cr Ni
df 9 9 9 9 3 3 5
SS 617405 48805 2047 52986 2981 2981 92274
MS 68601 5423 341.2 5887 993 993.5 18455
F 1.028 1.648 1.267 1.373 NA NA 525.7
P 0.456 0.175 0.346 0.270 NA NA 0.0019
 Linearassociation
between two
variables

 Range: -1 & +1

 Types:
 Pearsoncorrelation
 Spearman Rank
 Function
relation between variables:
dependent and independent variables.
For example,
 Tree diameter and volume
 Aboveground biomass and vegetation indices

 Linear: = + + ⋯+ +

 Nonlinear: = +

 Assumption: ~Ν ,
 Evaluation of Regression Analysis
 Coefficientof determination (R2)
 Root mean squared error (RMSE)
 Overall significance of model and the
parameters

 Limitation of standard regression


 Standard regression cannot handle non-
normal response
 Generalized linear models: Binary logistic,
Multinomial
R software is freely available and the most
flexible. A platform for graphics, statistical
computing and spatial analysis

Start now or never!!!!

You might also like