28

CARABOBO UNIVERSITY
FACULTY OF EDUCATIONAL SCIENCES
SCHOOL OF EDUCATION
DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS AND PHYSICS
MENTION: MATHEMATICS
CHAIR: LOGIC AND MATHEMATICS

ANALYTICAL PROGRAM

ASIGNATURA:LÓGICA Y MATEMÁTICA
CODE: FG1104
CREDIT UNITS: 04
HORAS SEMANALES: PRÁCTICAS:04TEÓRICAS:02TOTAL DE HORAS:06
COMPONENT:GENERAL
CARÁCTER DE LA ASIGNATURA:TEÓRICO - PRÁCTICO
SEMESTER: I
PREPARED BY:
TEACHERS:
OMAIRA NAVEDA
DAISY VÍRGÜEZ
ROSA TALAVERA
JULIO NATERA
HÉCTOR BETHELMY

Date of preparation: 2006

Page 1 of 8
29

CURRICULAR SPECIFICATIONS

TERMINAL OBJECTIVE:
Analytically apply the logical operations and mathematical language inherent to the processes of abstract reasoning.
SYNOPSIS OF CONTENT:

Logic. Language functions. Reasoning. Fallacies. Logical propositions. Symbolization of reasoning. Truth tables. Laws of
inference. Set theories. Operations with sets. Complementations and partition. Cartesian product. Relations, functions, domain,
range, inverse function, composite function, linear function, inequalities and inequations.

METHODOLOGICAL STRATEGIES:

It is a theoretical and practical subject that uses various strategies depending on the topic of study, among them it employs the inductive and deductive methods.
analytical, demonstrations, exercises, exemplifications, guides, visual images, diagrams, graphs, schemas, readings, group techniques
interactive, etc.

JUSTIFICATION AND IMPORTANCE

Logic and mathematics is a subject considered part of general culture due to its importance for the student.
of education in any mention.
Such knowledge intervenes in all human activities and helps the student to: synthesize ideas, analyze concepts, compose speeches,
argue, refute inappropriate positions, distinguish the valid from the invalid, make demonstrations, operate for calculation, etc.
The program of this subject responds to current needs, based on the study conducted in the faculty commission, in order to
to provide the necessary knowledge for the logical and mathematical thinking of the professional in problem-solving in their environment
life.

Page 2 of 8
30

SCHEDULE OF ACTIVITIES

Week Date Content

4 Weeks Logic. Functions of Language.
Reasonings. Fallacy.

4 Weeks Logical Propositions. Connectives. Symbolization of Reasonings. Truth Tables. Laws of

Inference.

5 Weeks Set Theory.

Intervals, inequalities and inequations, absolute value, even
Ordered and Cartesian Product.

5 Weeks Relación,Función,clasificación, Dominio y Rango, Función Inversa, función compuesta, Función

Linear, Analytical Relationships between Lines.
18 Weeks

UNIT I
FINAL OBJECTIVE: Identify valid reasoning in natural language.
Content Content Content EstrategiasMetodológicas Activities of
Conceptual Procedural Attitudinal Activities Closure-Evaluation
Object of Logic. Determine the influence of logic Accept participation rules. Reductive method. Feedback from the
to reason correctly. Evaluate the importance of logic process through the
Identify the elements for his/her career. Group strategies. handling of the question.
constitutive elements of logic. Develop skills of Use of schemes
Construct statements. logical thinking. Exemplification. what summarizes the activity
Functions of Differentiate the types of language. Describe the differences in language. related.
Language. Identify the functions of language found. Presentation of reports
existing. Interest in the proper use of Brainstorming management. weekly.
Example logical statements. language for reasoning. Individual tests.
Supplementary Readings. Group Tests.

Page 3 of 8
31

UNIT I (Continuation)
TERMINAL OBJECTIVE: Identify valid reasoning in natural language.
Content Content Content MethodologicalStrategies Activities of
Conceptual Procedural Attitudinal (Activities) Closure-Evaluation
Reasoning. Interpret the concept of Acknowledgments of importance To exemplify Feedback.
Premises and reasoning from examples ofreasoningasaresourcefor Schemes Review of schemes of
conclusion. Identification of the premises and investigate Técnicas grupales interactivas. work.
Types and Conclusion conclusion in a reasoning. Consider situations where I am Individual tests and
Differentiate the types of present the reasoning. group
reasoning. Motivation for participation in
Build valid reasoning classroom activities.
Internalize the process.
Fallacies Recognizing the reasoning not Interest in recognizing the Brainstorming. Management of the Weekly Reports.
Types of Fallacies valid. invalid reasoning. question. GroupWork.
(Formal and non Observe the elements that Assess the utility of knowledge Use of the chalkboard. Feedback from
formals) they intervene in the fallacy. from fallacies as reasoning no Guides. process.
Identify the common fallacy valid. Reading of statements in the Presentation of works.
invalid reasoning. Recognition of the usefulness of use press
Incorporar en el lenguaje una fórmula of language for reasoning
for reasoning. correctly.
Compose and decompose fallacies
in valid reasoning.
UNIT II
TERMINAL OBJECTIVE: Apply symbolic language in distinguishing valid reasoning from invalid reasoning.
Content Content Content MethodologicalStrategies Activities of
Conceptual Procedural Attitudinal Activities Closure-Evaluation
Propositions Observe different types of Relate the logical propositions Deductive Method Feedback from the
logics: atomic and propositions. with the language used in the Group Strategies. process through management
molecular. Differentiate between propositions teaching-learning process. Supplementary Readings. from the question.
atomic and molecular. Schemes. Presentation of reports
Detect the different types of Recognition of the usefulness of the Use of the Blackboard weekly.
Connectives
connectives used in the formation logical connectors in language Individual tests.
of compound propositions. natural and logical language Group Tests
mathematician Group Work

Page 4 of 8
32

UNIT II (Continuation)
FINAL OBJECTIVE: Apply symbolic language in distinguishing valid reasoning from invalid reasoning.
Content Content Content MethodologicalStrategies Activities of
Conceptual Procedural Attitudinal (Activities) Closure-Evaluation
Connectives Use the connectors in the Improve the language used. Exemplification Feedback from the
symbolization of propositions. process.

Symbolization of Identify the logical propositions Development of logical skills Logical schematics Group strategies.
in a reasoning formal. Exemplification Report presentation.
Reasonings Determine the connectors that join Proper management in the use of Supplementary Readings Individual and in tests
the propositions. language. Group techniques. team.
Combinar las proposiciones con los
connectives incorporating signs of
grouping.
Symbolization of reasoning
formed from reality.
Truth tables Identificarlos diferentes tipos de Recognize the importance of the Schemes Presentation of reports
truth tables. truth tables in development of Exemplification grupales.
Tables Observe the construction of the tables logical-formal skills. Group Techniques Demonstrations
of fundamental certainty. Development of logical skills Group tests and
Fundamentals
Build tables of certainty formal. individuals.
derivatives supported by the tables
Derived Tables fundamentals.
Determine the truth value of
different reasonings whose
Partial Tables variables have values
unknowns.
Determine the value of reasoning
with known value variables
Laws of inference Identify the logical laws used. Development of logical skills- Exemplification Feedback
in the calculation of inferences. formal. Group Strategies Group Assessments.
Apply the different laws in the Use of forms
theorem demonstration.

Page 5 of 8
33

UNIT III
TERMINAL OBJECTIVE: Operationalize mathematical knowledge by applying it in everyday life.
Content Content Content MethodologicalStrategies Activities of
Conceptual Procedural Attitudinal (Activities) Closure-Evaluation
Set Theory: Deduce the definition of a set. Evaluate the definition of a set in Deductive Method Tests
Identify the notation. your environment. Group Strategies. Suggested exercises.
Definition Identify the elements. Accept the notation. Use of the Chalkboard Group work.
Notation Analyze the types of sets. Recognize the elements. Exemplification Spontaneous participation in
Elements Discover the sets by Recognize the importance of types Group exercises and classes
Types extension. of sets. individuals
Discover the sets by Interest in describing the sets by
Ways to determine
understanding. extension and understanding.
a set. Identify a subset. Recognize the subsets.
Subset Apply the union of sets in Interest in the application of the
Operations of examples of everyday life. set operations to examples
sets. Apply the intersection of sets to of everyday life.
Union given exercises.
Apply the difference of sets in
Intersection
given examples.
Difference Apply the complement of sets
Supplement in given examples.

UNIT IV
TERMINAL OBJECTIVE: Analyze mathematical elements using the Cartesian plane.
Content Contenido Content MethodologicalStrategies Activities of
Conceptual Procedural Attitudinal Activities Closure-Evaluation
Intervals Deduce the definition of an interval. Recognize the definition of interval. Deductive Short Tests
Inequalities and Analyze the types of intervals. Evaluate the types of intervals. Graphing Review of Exercises
inequalities. Analizar las desigualdades e Recognize the importance of the use of Group activity to solve Spontaneous participation in
Absolute Value inequalities. inequalities and inequations. given exercises. class
Prove the theorems of the Show interest in the use of Demonstration
inequalities. theorems of inequalities Problem solving.
Solve inequalities. Assess the application of the Graphic representation.
Deduce the definition of absolute value. inequalities in resolution Deductive
problems.

Page 6 of 8
34

UNIT IV (Continuation)
TERMINAL OBJECTIVE: Analyze mathematical elements using the Cartesian plane.
Content Content Content MethodologicalStrategies Activities of
Conceptual Procedural Attitudinal (Activities) Closure-Evaluation
Absolute Value Analyze the properties of value Evaluate the application of inequalities Deductive Short Tests
By order. absolute. in problem solving. Demonstration Exercise Review
Cartesian product. Apply the absolute value in Interest in the definition of absolute value. Problem solving. Participation
given examples. Show interest in the properties of Graphic representation. spontaneous in class
Identify ordered pair. absolute value. Deductive
Define Cartesian product. Interest in its application. Heuristic.
Apply the properties of Recognize the importance of order. Group activity (exercise)
Cartesian product. Recognize the importance of the product Exercise
Cartesian.
UNIT V
TERMINAL OBJECTIVE: Develop skills in solving functions; domain, range, and analytical relationships between lines.
Content Content Content MethodologicalStrategies Activities of
Conceptual Procedural Attitudinal (Activities) Closure-Evaluation
Relationship Define the relationship between sets. Interés en la aplicación de la definición de Deductive method. Short Tests
Function Define function relationship to everyday examples Group strategies. Exercise Review
Definition Interest in applying the definition of function.
Differentiate the relationship of the function. Exemplifications Group work
Analyze the classification of Ability to exemplify situations that Exemplification Spontaneous participation
Classification
functions. difference between a relation and a function. Group activity with in class
*Domain of a Motivation in the recognition of the
Calculate the domain cases of examples.
function a function. functions. Demonstrations
*Range of a Calculate the range cases of a Interest in the exercising of cases of
function. function. domain of a function.
Inverse function Calculate inverse function. Interés en la ejercitación de los casos de rango
Composite Function. Example of a composite function. of a function.
Example of a linear function. Demonstrate skill in problem solving
Linear Function
Analyze the analytical relationships inverse functions.
Analytical Relationships
between lines. Interest in the application of functions
between lines. composed.
Recognition of a linear function.
Develop skills in calculation of the
analytical relationships between lines.

Página 7de 8
35

BIBLIOGRAPHIC REFERENCES

- Agudo, Carlos. (1991).Lógica e introducción a la matemática. [Material de la U.C.]. Bárbula Venezuela.

- Burgos, Alfonso. (1990).Iniciación a la lógica matemá[Link]:Editorial EdicionesCientíficas.

- Burgos, Alfonso. (1990).Matemáticas Generales. Tomo I. Madrid: Editorial Selecciones Científicas.

- Demodovich, B. (1991).Problemas y ejercicios de análisis matemático. Moscú: Editorial Mir.

- Hasser, Lasille. (1982).Análisis matemático. México: Trillas.

- Leithol, Lovis. (1992).El Cálculo. México:Harla.

Page 8 of 8