Plant Location Quantitative Methods Guide
Plant Location Quantitative Methods Guide
COURSE:
Plant Engineering - Practice
THEME:
Location of the Plant Quantitative Methods
TEACHER:
GROUP:01
MEMBERS:
Rodríguez Cruz, Lucero
●Sánchez Carazas, Mildrem Milagros
●Yupanqui Barrios, Andree Efrain
Arequipa - 2020
GUIDE 3: PLANT LOCATION QUANTITATIVE METHODS
1. OBJECTIVES
Learn to apply quantitative methods in decision making
plant locations, looking for the best alternatives among different ones
locations.
Calcular y comprender de manera más detallada los riesgos que tenemos de
implement, build and locate a production plant in certain
locations, this assisted by quantitative methods.
Learn to interpret and analyze the results of each quantitative method
of plant location.
2. DEVELOPMENT
[Link] 3–Practice Activities
The HiOctane Refinery needs to locate an intermediate holding facility.
between its Long Beach refinery and its main distributors. In the table
1 the coordinate map appears. The amount of gasoline dispatched until
and from the plant and the distributors is shown in Table 2. In Table 2 the
amount of gallons transported. Find the distribution point using the
center of gravity method.
∑
X coordinate of the center of gravity=
∑
∑
Y coordinate of the center of gravity=
∑
C. Grav: (308,217)
At the same time, the market study was deepened through surveys.
directly to a sample of the target market, obtaining the following
primary information:
The most valued attributes by the potential market for an apartment
for vacations, natural beauty of the surroundings (50%), access roads to
place (25%) and the weather (25%).
For the evaluation of the factors, use the following values: Excellent = 2,
Bueno = 1, Deficiente = 0
The study noted that Arequipa and Ica were the most preferred places in terms of
natural beauty of the surroundings, as the respondents expressed their
preference with equal weighting for both resorts.
Regarding access, Arequipa and Trujillo are preferred with the caveat that,
in this case, having to choose between the two, one opts for Arequipa
for having wider avenues. As for the weather, there is no preference.
specific between Trujillo and Ica, but when comparing Trujillo and Arequipa, people
prefers this one. The spa in Arequipa is preferred over Ica.
Subjective factors are valued at 30% and objective values at 70%.
Using the Brown and Gibson model, determine the location.
optimal project considering subjective and objective values.
A) Calculation of FOi.
0.302673867
0.331987508
0.365338625
B) Determination of Wj classification.
Wj
Natural beauty of the surroundings 0.50
Access routes to the place 0.25
Clima 0.25
Table No. 6: Determination of Wj classification.
Rating Rij
Excellent 2
Good 1
Deficient 0
Table No. 7: Rating of Rij
Climate
City Rating Row
Trujillo 1 0.25
Arequipa 2 0.5
Ica 1 0.25
Total 4 1
Table No. 10: Climate
D) Calculation of the FSi
Row
Factor Trujillo Arequipa Ica Wj
Beauty natural from 0.00 0.50 0.50 0.50
environment
Access routes to the place 0.33 0.67 0.00 0.25
Climate 0.25 0.50 0.25 0.25
Table No. 11: Calculation of FSi
= 0.1458
= 0.5417
0.3125
E) Calculation of MPL
=( ∗ ) +( ( 1 - k) ∗ )
Where:
k = 0.70
(1–k) = 0.3
= 0.255621707
0.394891256
0.349487037
F) Answer:
The optimal location of the project considering subjective values and
Objectives through the Brown and Gibson method is the city of Arequipa.
Additionally, the current central warehouse is located very far from the branches already.
that when it was built, a cheap place away from the center was sought after, and still
today, despite the opening of the shopping center, the housing in the area is
too scarce for it to be interesting to open branches in the area.
Indicate the coordinates where the new central warehouse should be located.
∑
X coordinate of the center of gravity=
∑
∑
Y coordinate of the center of gravity=
∑
Office Location
10 Office 5
8 Office 4
6 Office 1
Office 3 (3.46;5.96)
4 Office 2
2
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
The mining company Minera Hostthem S.A. has received a preliminary study that
give three location options for the central warehouse you want to install: A, B and
The company extracts minerals.
such as silver, gold, and zinc, etc.; and has three mines. In each one of
they have a mineral concentrator that separates the ore from
remaining sterile material. - The land costs are S/. 75/m2 in B, 30% more
in A and 10% less in C. - The staff required in A must be
specialized with a basic salary of S/. 800 monthly, which is to work
In B and C, an additional percentage would be charged, which would reach 10% in C and 15% in B.
FACTOR WEIGHING A B C
Logistics Management 3 4 3 5
Boarding Area 4 8 5 4
Land Cost 3 $47.50 $75.00 S/67.50
Cost of Labor 4 $800.00 $920.00 $380.00
Cost of Services to 5 S/220.00 S/250.00 S/190.00
Work.
Proximity to the 3 5 3 5
Concentrators
Table No. 15: Assigned Scores
= 47.6754 > 1
B) With that we conclude that; B is better than C
3 5 75 3 920 250 5 33
= ( )3 ( 4)( ) ( 4( ) ) ( )
5 4 67.5 880 190 5
C) Response
By using our dimensional analysis method, we see that option B is the
better among other places
For the evaluation of the factors use the following values: Excellent = 2,
Bueno = 1, Deficiente = 0. La cercanía a Mercado en Socabaya y Parque industrial
It is excellent but deficient in Mollebaya. Regarding transportation, there is
preference for accessibility in the Industrial Park, in Socabaya is good and
Deficient in Mollebaya. The workforce is good in the three locations.
The proximity to the Raw Material is excellent in Socabaya and Mollebaya and with
many problems in the Industrial Park. If it is taken that the objective factors
they are three times more important than the subjective ones, indicate your answer using
the Brown and Gibson Method. Note: Use all decimals.
A) Confrontation Matrix
Factors Transport Market I Mp Total WE
MARKET 1 1 1 3 0.375
TRANSPORT 0 1 0 1 0.125
MO 0 1 0 1 0.125
MP 1 1 1 3 0.375
8 1
A) Subjective Factors
B) MPL
MPL
K= 0.75
MPLA (0.75)(0.38875866)+(0.25)(0.4583) = 0.361152
MPLB (0.75)(0.3638756)+(0.25)(0.3125) = 0.35098
MPLC (0.75)(0.30743378)+(0.25)(0.2292) = 0.28787
C) Answer
3. CONCLUSIONES
First. -In order to choose the optimal location for the correct installation and the
the development of this must formulate the relevant factors or criteria according to
the needs of the plant or facility under study. For this, we will also need to
apply quantitative methods.
4. RECOMENDACIONES