0% found this document useful (0 votes)
7 views7 pages

Step-by-Step Probability Solutions

Uploaded by

adinwhite116
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
7 views7 pages

Step-by-Step Probability Solutions

Uploaded by

adinwhite116
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Full step-by-step solutions (Questions 9 →

17)
I'll solve each question fully, showing the distribution used, the formulas, the algebraic steps, and
the final numeric result (rounded sensibly).

9. Oil prospector — success probability p=0.2p=0.2p=0.2


(i) Probability the third hole is the first productive well.
This is a geometric trial: the first success occurs on trial k=3k=3k=3.

P(first success at 3)=(1−p)3−1p=(1−0.2)2(0.2)=0.82⋅0.2.P(\text{first success at }3)=(1-p)^{3-


1}p=(1-0.2)^2(0.2)=0.8^2\cdot0.2.P(first success at 3)=(1−p)3−1p=(1−0.2)2(0.2)=0.82⋅0.2.

Calculate:

0.82=0.64,0.64×0.2=[Link]^2=0.64,\qquad 0.64\times0.2=[Link]=0.64,0.64×0.2=0.128.

Answer: 0.128\boxed{0.128}0.128.

(ii) If he drills 10 wells, probability he finds no productive well.


Each trial independent; probability of failure =1−p=0.8=1-p=0.8=1−p=0.8. For 10 failures:

P(0 successes)=(0.8)10.P(0\ \text{successes})=(0.8)^{10}.P(0 successes)=(0.8)10.

Compute stepwise:

0.82=0.64,0.84=0.642=0.4096,0.88=0.40962=0.16777216,0.8^2=0.64,\quad
0.8^4=0.64^2=0.4096,\quad
0.8^8=0.4096^2=0.16777216,0.82=0.64,0.84=0.642=0.4096,0.88=0.40962=0.16777216,
0.810=0.88⋅0.82=0.16777216×0.64=0.1073741824.0.8^{10}=0.8^8\cdot0.8^2=0.16777216\
times0.64=0.1073741824.0.810=0.88⋅0.82=0.16777216×0.64=0.1073741824.

Answer: 0.1073741824 (≈0.1074)\boxed{0.1073741824\ (\


approx0.1074)}0.1073741824 (≈0.1074).

10. Jim — multiple choice, p=0.60p=0.60p=0.60


Probability that the 3rd correct answer occurs on the 8th attempt.

This is a negative binomial event: on trial 8 we get the 3rd success → among first 7 trials there
must be exactly 2 successes, then success on 8th.

P=(72)p3(1−p)5.P=\binom{7}{2}p^{3}(1-p)^{5}.P=(27)p3(1−p)5.

Compute step-by-step:

(72)=7⋅62=21.\binom{7}{2}=\frac{7\cdot6}{2}=21.(27)=27⋅6=21.
p3=(0.6)3=0.6×0.6×0.6=0.216.p^3=(0.6)^3=0.6\times0.6\
times0.6=0.216.p3=(0.6)3=0.6×0.6×0.6=0.216.
(1−p)5=(0.4)5=0.42⋅0.42⋅0.4=0.16⋅0.16⋅0.4=0.0256⋅0.4=0.01024.(1-p)^5=(0.4)^5=0.4^2\
cdot0.4^2\cdot0.4 = 0.16\cdot0.16\cdot0.4 =0.0256\cdot0.4=0.01024.
(1−p)5=(0.4)5=0.42⋅0.42⋅0.4=0.16⋅0.16⋅0.4=0.0256⋅0.4=0.01024.

Multiply:

0.216×0.01024=0.00221184,0.216\times0.01024=0.00221184,0.216×0.01024=0.00221184,
21×0.00221184=0.04644864.21\times0.00221184=0.04644864.21×0.00221184=0.04644864.

Answer: 0.04644864 (≈0.04645, 4.645%)\boxed{0.04644864\ (\approx0.04645,\


4.645\%)}0.04644864 (≈0.04645, 4.645%).

11. Job applicants — 10 applicants, 5 are college graduates;


pick 3 without replacement.
Probability all three are college graduates.

This is a hypergeometric situation:

P=(53)(103).P=\frac{\binom{5}{3}}{\binom{10}{3}}.P=(310)(35).

Compute:

(53)=5⋅42=10,(103)=10⋅9⋅83⋅2⋅1=120.\binom{5}{3}=\frac{5\cdot4}{2}=10,\qquad \binom{10}
{3}=\frac{10\cdot9\cdot8}{3\cdot2\cdot1}=120.(35)=25⋅4=10,(310)=3⋅2⋅110⋅9⋅8=120.

So

P=10120=112≈0.0833333.P=\frac{10}{120}=\frac{1}{12}\approx0.0833333.P=12010=121
≈0.0833333.
Answer: 112≈0.08333 (8.333%)\boxed{\tfrac{1}{12}\approx0.08333\ (8.333\%)}121
≈0.08333 (8.333%).

12. Flaws in cloth — Poisson with mean 0.1 per m². For 10
m², λ=0.1×10=1\lambda=0.1\times10=1λ=0.1×10=1.
Probability there is exactly one flaw in 10 m².

Poisson formula: P(X=k)=e−λλkk!P(X=k)=e^{-\lambda}\frac{\lambda^k}{k!}P(X=k)=e−λk!λk.


With λ=1, k=1\lambda=1,\ k=1λ=1, k=1:

P(X=1)=e−1111!=e−1.P(X=1)=e^{-1}\frac{1^1}{1!}=e^{-1}.P(X=1)=e−11!11=e−1.

Evaluate e−1=1/ee^{-1}=1/ee−1=1/e. Using e≈2.718281828459045e\


approx2.718281828459045e≈2.718281828459045:

e−1≈0.36787944117144233.e^{-1}\approx0.36787944117144233.e−1≈0.36787944117144233.

Answer: 0.3678794412 (≈0.36788)\boxed{0.3678794412\ (\


approx0.36788)}0.3678794412 (≈0.36788).

13. Phone calls — on average 2 phone calls per hour


(Poisson, λ=2\lambda=2λ=2 per hour).
Probability a phone call will come within the next hour = 1−P(no calls)1 - P(\text{no
calls})1−P(no calls).

For Poisson, P(0)=e−λP(0)=e^{-\lambda}P(0)=e−λ. So

P(≥1)=1−e−2.P(\ge1)=1-e^{-2}.P(≥1)=1−e−2.

Compute:

e−2≈0.1353352832366127,1−e−2≈0.8646647167633873.e^{-2}\approx0.1353352832366127,\
quad 1-e^{-2}\
approx0.8646647167633873.e−2≈0.1353352832366127,1−e−2≈0.8646647167633873.

Answer: 0.8646647168 (≈86.466%)\boxed{0.8646647168\ (\


approx86.466\%)}0.8646647168 (≈86.466%).
(Interpretation: about 86.47% chance of at least one call in the hour.)

14. Bucket with 75 mosquito larvae in 5 L (5000 mL). A 200


mL flask is taken.
Find probability the flask contains at least one larva.

Modeling assumption: each of the 75 larvae independently has probability p=2005000=0.04p=\

the sample ∼Binomial(n=75,p=0.04)\sim\mathrm{Binomial}


dfrac{200}{5000}=0.04p=5000200=0.04 of being in the 200 mL sample. Then the number in

(n=75,p=0.04)∼Binomial(n=75,p=0.04). (This is a good approximation when larvae are


randomly and independently distributed; an exact hypergeometric could be used if you model
discrete mL units.)

We want P(≥1)=1−P(0)=1−(1−p)75P(\ge1)=1-P(0) = 1-(1-p)^{75}P(≥1)=1−P(0)=1−(1−p)75.

Compute:

1−p=0.96,(0.96)75≈0.04681041355184099,1-p=0.96,\qquad (0.96)^{75}\approx
0.04681041355184099,1−p=0.96,(0.96)75≈0.04681041355184099,
P(≥1)=1−0.04681041355184099=0.953189586448159.P(\ge1)=1-
0.04681041355184099=0.953189586448159.P(≥1)=1−0.04681041355184099=0.953189586448
159.

Answer: 0.9531895864 (≈95.32%)\boxed{0.9531895864\ (\


approx95.32\%)}0.9531895864 (≈95.32%).

(Note: if you want the exact hypergeometric form it would be 1−(5000−75200)(5000200)1-\


dfrac{\binom{5000-75}{200}}{\binom{5000}{200}}1−(2005000)(2005000−75), but the
binomial approximation above is simpler and very accurate here.)

15. Monthly garbage — Normal with mean μ=28\


mu=28μ=28 kg and standard deviation σ=2\sigma=2σ=2 kg.
(i) P(X>30.2)P(X>30.2)P(X>30.2).

Compute z-score:

z=30.2−282=2.22=1.1.z=\frac{30.2-28}{2}=\frac{2.2}{2}=1.1.z=230.2−28=22.2=1.1.
So

P(X>30.2)=1−Φ(1.1).P(X>30.2)=1-\Phi(1.1).P(X>30.2)=1−Φ(1.1).

Using the standard normal table (or Φ\PhiΦ via the error function),
Φ(1.1)≈0.8643339390536172\Phi(1.1)\
approx0.8643339390536172Φ(1.1)≈0.8643339390536172. Thus

P(X>30.2)≈1−0.8643339390536172=0.1356660609463828.P(X>30.2)\approx1-
0.8643339390536172=0.1356660609463828.P(X>30.2)≈1−0.8643339390536172=0.135666060
9463828.

Answer: 0.1356660609 (≈13.57%)\boxed{0.1356660609\ (\


approx13.57\%)}0.1356660609 (≈13.57%).

(ii) P(27<X<31)P(27<X<31)P(27<X<31).

Z-scores:

z27=27−282=−0.5,z31=31−282=1.5.z_{27}=\frac{27-28}{2}=-0.5,\qquad z_{31}=\frac{31-28}
{2}=1.5.z27=227−28=−0.5,z31=231−28=1.5.

So

P(27<X<31)=Φ(1.5)−Φ(−0.5).P(27<X<31)=\Phi(1.5)-\Phi(-0.5).P(27<X<31)=Φ(1.5)−Φ(−0.5).

Using values Φ(1.5)≈0.9331927987311419\Phi(1.5)\


approx0.9331927987311419Φ(1.5)≈0.9331927987311419 and Φ(−0.5)≈0.3085375387259869\
Phi(-0.5)\approx0.3085375387259869Φ(−0.5)≈0.3085375387259869,

P≈0.9331927987311419−0.3085375387259869=0.624655260005155.P\
approx0.9331927987311419-
0.3085375387259869=0.624655260005155.P≈0.9331927987311419−0.3085375387259869=0.6
24655260005155.

Answer: 0.6246552600 (≈62.47%)\boxed{0.6246552600\ (\


approx62.47\%)}0.6246552600 (≈62.47%).

16. Bearings — Normally distributed with mean μ=5.0005\


mu=5.0005μ=5.0005 inch and σ=0.0010\
sigma=0.0010σ=0.0010 inch.
Specification: diameters must lie in the interval [5.000−0.0020, 5.000+0.0020]=[4.998, 5.002]
[5.000-0.0020,\;5.000+0.0020]=[4.998,\;5.002][5.000−0.0020,5.000+0.0020]=[4.998,5.002].
Anything outside that interval is scrap. Find fraction that will be scrap.

Compute z-scores for the specification bounds:

zlow=4.998−5.00050.001=−0.00250.001=−2.5,z_{\text{low}}=\frac{4.998-5.0005}{0.001}=\
frac{-0.0025}{0.001}=-2.5,zlow=0.0014.998−5.0005=0.001−0.0025=−2.5,
zhigh=5.002−5.00050.001=0.00150.001=1.5.z_{\text{high}}=\frac{5.002-5.0005}{0.001}=\
frac{0.0015}{0.001}=[Link]=0.0015.002−5.0005=0.0010.0015=1.5.

Scrap proportion =P(X<4.998)+P(X>5.002)=Φ(−2.5)+[1−Φ(1.5)]=P(X<4.998)+P(X>5.002)=\


Phi(-2.5)+[1-\Phi(1.5)]=P(X<4.998)+P(X>5.002)=Φ(−2.5)+[1−Φ(1.5)].

Using values:

Φ(−2.5)≈0.006209665325776132,1−Φ(1.5)≈1−0.9331927987311419=0.06680720126885807.\
Phi(-2.5)\approx0.006209665325776132,\quad 1-\Phi(1.5)\approx1-
0.9331927987311419=0.06680720126885807.Φ(−2.5)≈0.006209665325776132,1−Φ(1.5)≈1−0.
9331927987311419=0.06680720126885807.

Sum:

0.006209665325776132+0.06680720126885807=0.0730168665946342 (approximately).0.0062
09665325776132+0.06680720126885807=0.0730168665946342\ (\
text{approximately}).0.006209665325776132+0.06680720126885807=0.0730168665946342 (a
pproximately).

Answer: 0.0730168666 (≈7.3017%)\boxed{0.0730168666\ (\


approx7.3017\%)}0.0730168666 (≈7.3017%).

(About 7.30% of production will be scrap under the current machine setting.)

17. Download time — Normally distributed with mean


μ=6.5\mu=6.5μ=6.5 sec and variance =5.29=5.29=5.29.
Standard deviation σ=5.29=2.3\sigma=\sqrt{5.29}=2.3σ=5.29=2.3 sec. Find percentage with
download time less than 5 seconds.

Compute z-score:

z=5−6.52.3=−1.52.3≈−0.6521739130.z=\frac{5-6.5}{2.3}=\frac{-1.5}{2.3}\approx-
0.6521739130.z=2.35−6.5=2.3−1.5≈−0.6521739130.
So

P(X<5)=Φ(−0.6521739130)≈0.2571444933580459.P(X<5)=\Phi(-0.6521739130)\
approx0.2571444933580459.P(X<5)=Φ(−0.6521739130)≈0.2571444933580459.

Answer: 0.2571444934 (≈25.71%)\boxed{0.2571444934\ (\


approx25.71\%)}0.2571444934 (≈25.71%).

You might also like