Language Variation
(External)
By: Group 2
Group Members:
Endik Setiyo Laksono 2221000320058
Putri Sartika 2221000320100
Insiyah Dwi S 2221000320073
Zulfa Zahrotun N 2221000320015
Language Variation (External)
The importance of studying external language
variation.
Refers to differences in language caused by social
and geographical factors, such as social class,
ethnicity, region, and communicative context.
Contrasts with internal variation.
Aspects of External Language Variation
Mutual Intelligibility Isogloss Dialect Boundary
Refers to the capacity Depicts the A geographical
of speakers from two geographical boundary demarcation separating
or more language of the distribution of a two or more dialects
varieties. specific linguistic within the same
Evident between feature. language, typically
American English and In the US, "cot" (similar to established based on
British English "caught") in the North overlapping bundles of
compared to the South isoglosses.
Aspects of External Language Variation
Dialect Contiuum Dialect Accent
Refers to a situation in A particular form of a Refers solely to
which language language used by a pronunciation, the
variation changes specific regional or phonetic and
gradually over a social group. phonological features
geographic area. Two types of dialects: that mark how a
Where phonological regional dialects and speaker articulates a
and lexical features social dialects. language.
change gradually
rather than abruptly.
Aspects of External Language Variation
Idiolect Sociolect
Encompassing specific Used by particular social
word choices, groups, influenced by factors
pronunciation habits, like social class, occupation,
intonation, and speech ethnicity, or age.
style. For instance, informal
workers might use slang and
relaxed language, while
formal workers employ
standard language with
professional jargon.
Conclusion
Language variation is fundamentally driven by both
geographic factors, which delineate physical
boundaries and dialects, and primary social factors
such as class, age, and ethnicity.
The criterion of mutual intelligibility serves as the core
determinant distinguishing a dialect from a distinct
language, while the clustering of isoglosses creates the
definitive dialect boundaries. Crucially, the analysis of
sociolects demonstrates that language varieties
interact deeply with social structure. By
reflecting social identity and preserving local cultural
heritage, these variations foster local
cohesion, even as they create stratified communication
patterns.