Oral Language Didactics Matrix Guide
Oral Language Didactics Matrix Guide
READING MATRIX
The following reading matrix aims to serve as a consultation tool when conducting the main evaluations.
from the course, these are the theoretical exam, the planning, and the pedagogical reflection. To carry out this matrix, you must complete the following table, which associates
Each text, reviewed in the course, with a specific theme and indicates its key concepts, their definition, and their relevance from the didactics of competence.
oral.
i. 1.1. Vilá, M. (2002). - competence is the teacher's ability to establish pedagogical communication
Speak to learn to oral effective and efficient with their students, by developing in their personality a meta-discursive reflection is a key element
talking better: the balance flexible style and achieve desired educational outcomes. from didactics, a reflection is made on a
between the use of the language and speech to develop competence
communicative, allowing to develop the goal
the reflection. In Barragán cognition in students, that is, being
et al., Speaking in class: - reflexiónEs el rol reflexivo de la producción lingüística, se centra en el juego si se crean consciente de sus procesos, debido a que permite
how to work the tongue metadiscursive in the classroom, situations of using language articulated with situations of making decisions regarding one's own learning,
oral at the school center. reflection on the use. It allows for a reflection on all elements adapting to different ones. situations a
Barcelona: Grao. of communicative competence. communicative (sociolinguistics)
ii. 1.2. Camps, A. (2002).
Speak in class, learn
language. In Barragán et al.,
Speaking in class: how
working on oral language in
the center school Speak It relates to dialogue; it makes concepts evident, such as
Barcelona: Grao. to learn also allows the transformation in dynamic contrast with those of the
companions and with what the teacher proposes, as a learning objective.
The dialogue arises as a need for reflection on issues that
they affect the relationship between people, attitudes, values, and to moral formation
of children and young people. Dialogue also arises as a necessity of the
social interaction, to promote conceptual development.
Palou, J., Bosch, C. - Situation Set of elements involved in a communicative act: the sender;
(coords.) (2005). The communicative the receiver; the message; the place and the moment where the act takes place,
speech oral etc. links to the specific place and the exact moment in which everyone
Barcelona: Editorial these elements act and interrelate.
Graó. (pp. 15-34).
-Participants, - Participants: it should be observed; how many there are and what characteristics they have
framework and objective (gender,age, social level, etc.), one must consider what role it is that
they perform (there is always a meaning related to the context). The
participants maintain an emotional bond among themselves.
Marco: It is the factor of time and space (we always find ourselves in a now
and here). As for time, the lack of time or the fact of not having
hurry is a decisive factor. In the case of space, it is distinguished between-
public spaces (dining room, the classroom is a public space) each of these
places exert their influence on the conversations we have and in
our behaviors. And there is also private space.
Objective: It is about knowing the reason that brings the participants together.
distinguish between external causes (work) and internal causes (meeting with
friends). The purposes that different situations may pursue
Communicative aspects can be varied and will always relate to the text.
that the participants want to create within a defined framework
Speech acts They produce a certain effect on the person who listens to us, since
when we speak for things to happen, each of the statements
linguistic signals produced by a speaker so that things happen, so that they
carry out an action. This is adapted to social conventions.
There are 3 types of speech acts: locutionary act (literal meaning), illocutionary act
(the value that the statement acquires) and perlocutionary act (the effect it produces)
statement).
alterity It relates to the distinction between the self and the other. It is about "alternating" or
change one's own perspective for that of the "other", considering and having
the point of view of the one who thinks. I am different from the other, then
when something is transited, the other understands it differently and in this
interaction-dialogue generates something new (it is constructed).
Wertsch, J. (1998). The teaching Its function is for students to take on the active role of challenging others.
mind in action. Good reciprocal (focus questions, both students and teachers take on the role of guide
Air: Aique. in the oral one) the other members of the group, through acquired processes, organize in
I return to a set of strategies typically used by readers
experts - the forms of dialogue in these strategies are modeled first
by the teacher. Through 3 processes: show, systematize, and conceptualize.
then the teacher trains the students in its use in discussion contexts
group-students are introduced to their role as dialogue leaders, through the
explicit teachings, imitation of activities modeled by the teacher and the
teacher feedback to guide the discussion. The strategies
used are 4: to ask, to summarize, to clarify, and to predict.
Approach of It is led by the student, while the adult creates a rich environment.
acquisition for learning, the adult allows students to choose how to engage
in it. It is a learning alongside development.
Approach It involves the collaboration between the teacher and the student in the choice of the
participatory topics that will be studied and the manner in which they will be addressed. The
guided learning can precede development.