Project Diary

VIII Semester

Academic year: 2024-2025

 Project Diary
Department of ………………………………………….

Batch NO:

VIII Semester

Academic year: 2024-2025

S. No Register No. of the Project Member Name of the Project Member

1.

2.

3.

4.

Name of the Supervisor with Designation:

HOD
 Department of FOOD TECHNOLOGY

Vision of the Institute:

To be world class nodal centre committed to advanced learning, research

and training to serve the nation, meeting the national / international standards

Mission of the Institute:

To be a premier Engineering College, much sought after by the industries

and society offering professional education and training blended with ethical

values to convert student resource into strong assets of our nation

Vision of the Department:

To produce knowledgeable graduates capable of solving major societal

issues technical challenges around food processing and associated industries

through systematic approaches.

Mission of the Department:

M1: To excel in teaching by offering professional education imbibing ethical

and moral values.

M2: To produce technically strong engineers who could excel in research,

development and food technology related fields.

Program Educational Objectives (PEOs):

The PEOs are to facilitate graduating students to:

PEO 1: To prepare students as a qualified food technologists for Food industries, research
organization and teaching.

PEO 2: To provide students with a solid foundation in basic sciences related to food
technology, food science and food technology & engineering.

PEO 3: To enable the students with good scientific and engineering knowledge so as to
comprehend, design, and create food products and device for food industry and provide
solutions for the challenges in food industry as well as in agriculture.

PEO 4: To train students in professional and ethical attitude, effective communication skills,
teamwork skills and multidisciplinary approaches related to food technology and engineering.

PEO 5:To provide student with an academic environment aware of excellence, leadership,
written ethical codes and guidelines, and the life-long learning needed for a successful
professional career.
 Program Outcomes (PO)
Engineering Graduates will be able to:
1. Engineering knowledge: Apply the knowledge of mathematics, science, engineering
fundamentals, and an engineering specialization to the solution of complex engineering
problems.
2. Problem analysis: Identify, formulate, review research literature, and analyze complex
engineering problems reaching substantiated conclusions using first principles of
mathematics, natural sciences, and engineering sciences.
3. Design / development of solutions: Design solutions for complex engineering problems
and design system components or processes that meet the specified needs with appropriate
consideration for the public health and safety, and the cultural, societal, and environmental
considerations.
4. Conduct investigations of complex problems: Use research-based knowledge and
research methods including design of experiments, analysis and interpretation of data, and
synthesis of the information to provide valid conclusions.
5. Modern tool usage: Create, select, and apply appropriate techniques, resources, and
modern engineering and IT tools including prediction and modelling to complex engineering
activities with an understanding of the limitations.
6. The engineer and society: Apply reasoning informed by the contextual knowledge to
assess societal, health, safety, legal and cultural issues and the consequent responsibilities
relevant to the professional engineering practices.
7. Environment and sustainability: Understand the impact of the professional engineering
solutions in societal and environmental contexts, and demonstrate the knowledge of, and need
for sustainable development.
8. Ethics: Apply ethical principles and commit to professional ethics and responsibilities and
norms of the engineering practice.
9. Individual and team work: Function effectively as an individual, and as a member or
leader in diverse teams, and in multidisciplinary settings.
10. Communication: Communicate effectively on complex engineering activities with
the engineering community and with society at large, such as, being able to comprehend and
write effective reports and design documentation, make effective presentations, and give and
receive clear instructions.
11. Project management and finance: Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the
engineering and management principles and apply these to one’s own work, as a member and
leader in a team, to manage projects and in multidisciplinary environments.
12. Life-long learning: Recognize the need for, and have the preparation and ability to
engage in independent and life-long learning in the broadest context of technological change.
Program Specific Outcomes (PSO) Engineering Graduates will be able to:
PSO1:

PSO2:

PSO3:
 Project Guidelines for students

 Students should meet the guide at least two days before the commencement of all project reviews.
 Student presentation PPT, documentation and conference paper should be duly approved by
concerned guide.
 Student should come in formal dress code for all their reviews.
 Hard copy of documentation should be submitted in the prescribed Anna university UG
project format in stick file.
 Student should be present in the review venue at least one hour before their scheduled time.
 Student should ensure internal guide presence during the review.
 Student should update the reviewer feedback and submit the review form on same day of the
review.
 Students who are doing industry project have to update their project progress to their guide
at least twice in a week.
 Students doing in-house project should get permission from their guide, coordinator and
HOD for their absence to the college for the purpose of component purchase or any other
project related work.
 Format of the documentation, PPT and conference paper should not be changed.
 Students are not permitted to exceed the allotted time for their presentation.
 Students are not permitted to present the review in the absence of their team member.
 Students are instructed to submit their project after evaluation.

Student Signature Supervisor Signature

Date:
 Anna University Guidelines for Project Work

The student shall register for Project Work in final semester. Project work may be allotted to
a single student or to a group of students not exceeding 4 per group.
Project Work shall be carried out under the supervision of a “qualified teacher” in the
Department concerned. In this context “qualified teacher” means the faculty member possessing
(i) PG degree or (ii) Ph.D. degree.
The Project Work carried out in industry/academic/research institutions. In such cases, the
Project Work shall be jointly supervised by a supervisor of the department and an expert as a joint
supervisor from the organization and the student shall be instructed to meet the supervisor
periodically and to attend the review committee meetings for evaluating the progress. The review
meetings, if necessary, may also be arranged in online mode with prior approval from the Head of
the Institution and suitable record of the meetings shall be maintained.
The Head of the Institutions shall constitute a review committee for Project Work for each
programme. The review committee consists of supervisor, an expert from the Department and a
project coordinator from the Department. If the project coordinator/expert member happens to be the
supervisor, then an alternate member shall be nominated. In the case of Industrial Project, the review
committee shall have the supervisor, the coordinator from industry and the project coordinator from
the Department. There shall be three reviews conducted by the review committee. The student shall
make presentation on the progress made by him / her before the committee. The total marks
obtained in the three reviews shall be reduced for 60 marks and rounded to the nearest integer.
The project report shall carry a maximum of 10 marks. The project report shall be submitted
as per the approved guidelines as given by the Director, Centre for Academic Courses. Same marks
shall be awarded to every student within the project group for the project report. The viva-voce
examination shall carry 30 marks. Marks are awarded to each student of the project group is based
on the individual performance in the viva-voce examination.

Continuous Assessment End Semester Examinations

(60 Marks) (40 Marks)
Review I Review II Review III Project Viva-Voce Examination
Report
20 20 20 External Internal External Supervisor
10 10 10 10
In the case of industrial projects, the marks allotted for supervisor will be shared equally by the
supervisor from the Department and coordinator from Industry.

The last date for submission of the project report is on the last working day of the semester. If a
student fails to submit the project report on or before the specified deadline, it will be considered as
fail in the Project Work and the student shall re-register for the same in the subsequent semester.
Tentative date for reviews:

Review Date

0th Review 13.02.2025

1st Review 13.03.2025

2nd Review 22.04.2025

3rd Review 21.05.2025

Final Model Review 29.05.2025

 FORM – I Use)
Batch
FINAL YEAR STUDENT PROJECT – BATCH DETAILS Number

Details Student Student Student Student

S. No Detail Detail Detail Detail
1 Name
2 Register Number
Address
City
3 Pin Code

4 Phone
5 E-Mail ID

6 Area of Interest
Number of
7 Paper(s)
Presented
Number of
8 Mini Project(s)
Done
Prize(s) won
9 (if any)
Achievement(s)
10 (if any)

Passport
11 Size photo

12 Signature
1. Batch Details:

2. Project Area:
3. Project Details:

4. Supervisor: Internal -
External -

Date: Name and Signature of Internal Supervisor

 FORM – II

FINAL YEAR STUDENT PROJECT – SUPERVISOR DETAILS

S. NO DETAILS INTERNAL SUPERVISOR EXTERNAL SUPERVISOR

1 NAME

2 DESIGNATION

3 QUALIFICATION

4 ORGANIZATION

5 ADDRESS

6 CITY

7 STATE

8 PIN CODE

9 TELEPHONE
OFFICE
10 TELEPHONE
PERSONAL
11 E-MAIL

12 FAX

13 OFFICE WEB-
SITE
14 EXPERIENCE

(To be filled in all caps)

 FORM – III

FINAL YEAR STUDENT PROJECT – COMPANY DETAILS

(Applicable for Students Undertaking Industrial Projects)

1. Name of the Company :

2. Contact Details :
a. Name of Contact Person :
b. Designation :
c. Office Phone :
d. E-Mail ID :
3. Address of the Company :

Head Where the

S. No Details
Office Project Work
Assigned
1 Address
2 City
3 State
4 Pin Code
5 Phone Number
6 FAX
7 Web-Site

4 Referred
i. Name :
ii. Contact :
iii. Related by :
5. Type of Company:
i. Government / Public/Private :
ii. R&D / Product Development :
iii. Hardware / Software :

6. Year of Established :

7. Number of Employee(approx.) :

8. Annual Revenue(if any) :

Name and Signature of the External Supervisor

 FORM IV
PROJECT OVERVIEW

1. Batch Number :

2. Title of the Project (tentative) :

3. Internal Supervisor :

4. External Supervisor (if any) :

5. Name of the Company :
(If the Project done in Company)

6. Project Duration (tentative) :

7. Existing Technology
(if any):

8. Hardware Requirements :

9. Software Requirement(s) :
(if any)

10. Cost of the Project:

(approximated estimation)

11. Real Time application:(if any)

Signature of Students:

Signature of Supervisor: HOD

ABSTRACT (After completion of 3rd review)

Approved by Supervisor:
 Attendance
Weekly work done sheet

DAYS REMARKS

DAY 1

DAY 2

DAY 3

DAY 4

DAY 5

DAY 6

DAY 7

Signature of the Supervisor

 Attendance
Weekly work done sheet

DAYS REMARKS

DAY 1

DAY 2

DAY 3

DAY 4

DAY 5

DAY 6

DAY 7

Signature of the Supervisor

 Attendance
Weekly work done sheet

DAYS REMARKS

DAY 1

DAY 2

DAY 3

DAY 4

DAY 5

DAY 6

DAY 7

Signature of the Supervisor

 Attendance
Weekly work done sheet

DAYS REMARKS

DAY 1

DAY 2

DAY 3

DAY 4

DAY 5

DAY 6

DAY 7

Signature of the Supervisor

 Attendance
Weekly work done sheet

DAYS REMARKS

DAY 1

DAY 2

DAY 3

DAY 4

DAY 5

DAY 6

DAY 7

Signature of the Supervisor

 Attendance
Weekly work done sheet

DAYS REMARKS

DAY 1

DAY 2

DAY 3

DAY 4

DAY 5

DAY 6

DAY 7

Signature of the Supervisor

 Attendance
Weekly work done sheet

DAYS REMARKS

DAY 1

DAY 2

DAY 3

DAY 4

DAY 5

DAY 6

DAY 7

Signature of the Supervisor

 Attendance
Weekly work done sheet

DAYS REMARKS

DAY 1

DAY 2

DAY 3

DAY 4

DAY 5

DAY 6

DAY 7

Signature of the Supervisor

 Attendance
Weekly work done sheet

DAYS REMARKS

DAY 1

DAY 2

DAY 3

DAY 4

DAY 5

DAY 6

DAY 7

Signature of the Supervisor

 Attendance
Weekly work done sheet

DAYS REMARKS

DAY 1

DAY 2

DAY 3

DAY 4

DAY 5

DAY 6

DAY 7

Signature of the Supervisor

 Attendance
Weekly work done sheet

DAYS REMARKS

DAY 1

DAY 2

DAY 3

DAY 4

DAY 5

DAY 6

DAY 7

Signature of the Supervisor

 Attendance
Weekly work done sheet

DAYS REMARKS

DAY 1

DAY 2

DAY 3

DAY 4

DAY 5

DAY 6

DAY 7

Signature of the Supervisor

 RUBRIC FOR EVALUATING A PROJECT

Project Evaluation Rubric

Needs Weight
Criteria Exceptional (4) Proficient (3) Developing (2)
Improvement (1) (%)
The project has a
The objective is The objective is The objective is
Clarity of clearly stated and
clear but lacks some vague or not missing or 15%
Objective well-defined
specificity. entirely clear. unclear.
objective.
Demonstrates
thorough Accurate and Contains major
Content Contains minor
understanding of the reasonably thorough inaccuracies or
Accuracy and inaccuracies or 20%
topic with accurate but lacks some incomplete
Depth insufficient depth.
information and depth. content.
significant depth.
Demonstrates
Highly creative,
creativity and Some creativity, Minimal
Creativity and original, and
originality with but the approach is creativity, lacking 15%
Innovation innovative approach
some innovative conventional. originality.
to the topic.
aspects.
Clear organization
Exceptionally well- Somewhat
Organization with minor Poorly organized,
organized and organized but 10%
and Structure inconsistencies in difficult to follow.
logically structured. lacks logical flow.
structure.
Visually appealing, Design is basic
Visual Design Good visual design, Poor design,
professional, and and does not fully
and supports distracts from the 10%
effectively enhances support
Presentation understanding well. content.
understanding. understanding.
Extensive research Adequate research Limited research, Minimal or no
Research and
with high-quality and with reliable some sources may research, poorly
Supporting 15%
properly cited sources and proper be unreliable or cited or missing
Evidence
sources. citations. improperly cited. sources.
Team collaborated Team worked well Uneven Minimal
Teamwork and
effectively, with clear together with minor collaboration, collaboration,
Collaboration 10%
roles and excellent issues in roles or some members significant
(if applicable)
communication. communication. contributed less. teamwork issues.
Project exceeds
Project meets Project is
expectations and Project is average
Overall Impact expectations and is underwhelming 15%
leaves a lasting with some impact.
impactful. and lacks impact.
impression.
 Project Mark Report

Name of the Student: Reg. no:

Performance Levels
Criteria
Type of Date (Max. of 20 marks for Not Marks
Excellent Good Fair
Review each one) Good (100)
(20) (15) (10)
(5)
[Link] Survey
and need of the Project
[Link] selection
01 [Link] definition
[Link]
[Link] to
answer
[Link] System
&proposed system
[Link] of
project
02
[Link] Diagram
[Link] Used
[Link] Skill
[Link]
diagram
explanation
[Link] Principle
[Link]/Software
03 [Link]
Contribution
[Link] of
software system
/Module working and
Functioning
[Link]
[Link],
Conclusion and
Discussion
Model
3. Future work
[Link]
[Link] of
prototype or real
 Project Mark Report

Name of the Student: Reg. no:

Performance Levels
Criteria
Type of Date (Max. of 20 marks for Not Marks
Excellent Good Fair
Review each one) Good (100)
(20) (15) (10)
(5)
[Link] Survey
and need of the Project
[Link] selection
01 [Link] definition
[Link]
[Link] to
answer
[Link] System
&proposed system
[Link] of
project
02
[Link] Diagram
[Link] Used
[Link] Skill
[Link]
diagram
explanation
[Link] Principle
[Link]/Software
03 [Link]
Contribution
[Link] of
software system
/Module working and
Functioning
[Link]
[Link],
Conclusion and
Discussion
Model
3. Future work
[Link]
[Link] of
prototype or real
 Project Mark Report

Name of the Student: Reg. no:

Performance Levels
Criteria
Type of Date (Max. of 20 marks for Not Marks
Excellent Good Fair
Review each one) Good (100)
(20) (15) (10)
(5)
[Link] Survey
and need of the Project
[Link] selection
01 [Link] definition
[Link]
[Link] to
answer
[Link] System
&proposed system
[Link] of
project
02
[Link] Diagram
[Link] Used
[Link] Skill
[Link]
diagram
explanation
[Link] Principle
[Link]/Software
03 [Link]
Contribution
[Link] of
software system
/Module working and
Functioning
[Link]
[Link],
Conclusion and
Discussion
Model
3. Future work
[Link]
[Link] of
prototype or real
 Project Mark Report

Name of the Student: Reg. no:

Performance Levels
Criteria
Type of Date (Max. of 20 marks for Not Marks
Excellent Good Fair
Review each one) Good (100)
(20) (15) (10)
(5)
[Link] Survey
and need of the Project
[Link] selection
01 [Link] definition
[Link]
[Link] to
answer
[Link] System
&proposed system
[Link] of
project
02
[Link] Diagram
[Link] Used
[Link] Skill
[Link]
diagram
explanation
[Link] Principle
[Link]/Software
03 [Link]
Contribution
[Link] of
software system
/Module working and
Functioning
[Link]
[Link],
Conclusion and
Discussion
Model
3. Future work
[Link]
[Link] of
prototype or real
ANNEXURE
 FORM – V (01 – Review)

FINAL YEAR STUDENT PROJECT – REVIEW FORM

1. Review Number Model Presentation : I - Review / II - Review / III - Review

2. Batch Number :

3. Student Name(s) :

4. Project Title :

5. Name of Guide :

6. Percentage of Project completion :

7. Work done for this review :

8. Documentation Completion(in pages) :

9. Referred Books:

10. Referred Journals

11. Referred Websites:

Signature of Student Signature of Supervisor

Reviewer comments:

Signature of reviewer

Signature of Supervisor Signature of HOD

 FORM – V (02 – Review)

FINAL YEAR STUDENT PROJECT – REVIEW FORM

1. Review Number Model Presentation : I - Review / II - Review / III - Review

2. Batch Number :

3. Student Name(s) :

4. Project Title :

5. Name of Guide :

6. Percentage of Project completion :

7. Work done for this review :

8. Documentation Completion(in pages):

9. Referred Books:

10. Referred Journals

11. Referred Websites:

Signature of Student Signature of Supervisor

Reviewer comments:

Signature of reviewer

Signature of Supervisor Signature of HOD

 FORM – V (03 – Review)

FINAL YEAR STUDENT PROJECT – REVIEW FORM

1. Review Number Model Presentation : I - Review / II - Review / III - Review

2. Batch Number :

3. Student Name(s) :

4. Project Title :

5. Name of Guide :

6. Percentage of Project completion :

7. Work done for this review :

8. Documentation Completion(in pages):

9. Referred Books:

10. Referred Journals

11. Referred Websites:

Signature of Student Signature of Supervisor

Reviewer comments:

Signature of reviewer

Signature of Supervisor Signature of HOD

 FORM – V (Model)

FINAL YEAR STUDENT PROJECT – REVIEW FORM

1. Review Number Model Presentation : Model Review

2. Batch Number :

3. Student Name(s) :

4. Project Title :

5. Name of Guide :

6. Percentage of Project completion :

7. Work done for this review :

8. Documentation Completion(in pages):

9. Referred Books:

10. Referred Journals

11. Referred Websites:

Signature of Student Signature of Supervisor

Reviewer comments:

Signature of reviewer

Signature of Supervisor Signature of HOD

 FORM VI

LIST OF PUBLICATIONS/IPRS

Research Papers Published:

National/ International Journal / Conference Publication:
(Title of the paper, name of the journal, volume number, issue number, page number, year of publication)

1)

2)

3)

4)

Patent Filed:

1)

2)

3)

4)

Future Scope of the Project:

Signature of Supervisor Signature of HOD

Project Diary
VIII Semester

Academic year: 2024-2025

 Project Diary
Department of ………………………………………….

Batch NO:

VIII Semester

Academic year: 2024-2025

S. No Register No. of the Project Member Name of the Project Member

1.

2.

3.

4.

Name of the Supervisor with Designation:

HOD
 Department of ………………………………………………..

Vision of the Institute:

Mission of the Institute:

Vision of the Department:

Mission of the Department:

Program Educational Objectives (PEOs):

The PEOs are to facilitate graduating students to:

PEO1:

PEO2:

PEO3:
 Program Outcomes (PO)
Engineering Graduates will be able to:
1. Engineering knowledge: Apply the knowledge of mathematics, science, engineering
fundamentals, and an engineering specialization to the solution of complex engineering
problems.
2. Problem analysis: Identify, formulate, review research literature, and analyze complex
engineering problems reaching substantiated conclusions using first principles of
mathematics, natural sciences, and engineering sciences.
3. Design / development of solutions: Design solutions for complex engineering problems
and design system components or processes that meet the specified needs with appropriate
consideration for the public health and safety, and the cultural, societal, and environmental
considerations.
4. Conduct investigations of complex problems: Use research-based knowledge and
research methods including design of experiments, analysis and interpretation of data, and
synthesis of the information to provide valid conclusions.
5. Modern tool usage: Create, select, and apply appropriate techniques, resources, and
modern engineering and IT tools including prediction and modelling to complex engineering
activities with an understanding of the limitations.
6. The engineer and society: Apply reasoning informed by the contextual knowledge to
assess societal, health, safety, legal and cultural issues and the consequent responsibilities
relevant to the professional engineering practices.
7. Environment and sustainability: Understand the impact of the professional engineering
solutions in societal and environmental contexts, and demonstrate the knowledge of, and need
for sustainable development.
8. Ethics: Apply ethical principles and commit to professional ethics and responsibilities and
norms of the engineering practice.
9. Individual and team work: Function effectively as an individual, and as a member or
leader in diverse teams, and in multidisciplinary settings.
10. Communication: Communicate effectively on complex engineering activities with
the engineering community and with society at large, such as, being able to comprehend and
write effective reports and design documentation, make effective presentations, and give and
receive clear instructions.
11. Project management and finance: Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the
engineering and management principles and apply these to one’s own work, as a member and
leader in a team, to manage projects and in multidisciplinary environments.
12. Life-long learning: Recognize the need for, and have the preparation and ability to
engage in independent and life-long learning in the broadest context of technological change.
Program Specific Outcomes (PSO) Engineering Graduates will be able to:
PSO1:

PSO2:

PSO3:
 Project Guidelines for students

 Students should meet the guide at least two days before the commencement of all project reviews.
 Student presentation PPT, documentation and conference paper should be duly approved by
concerned guide.
 Student should come in formal dress code for all their reviews.
 Hard copy of documentation should be submitted in the prescribed Anna university UG
project format in stick file.
 Student should be present in the review venue at least one hour before their scheduled time.
 Student should ensure internal guide presence during the review.
 Student should update the reviewer feedback and submit the review form on same day of the
review.
 Students who are doing industry project have to update their project progress to their guide
at least twice in a week.
 Students doing in-house project should get permission from their guide, coordinator and
HOD for their absence to the college for the purpose of component purchase or any other
project related work.
 Format of the documentation, PPT and conference paper should not be changed.
 Students are not permitted to exceed the allotted time for their presentation.
 Students are not permitted to present the review in the absence of their team member.
 Students are instructed to submit their project after evaluation.

Student Signature Supervisor Signature

Date:
 Anna University Guidelines for Project Work

The student shall register for Project Work in final semester. Project work may be allotted to
a single student or to a group of students not exceeding 4 per group.
Project Work shall be carried out under the supervision of a “qualified teacher” in the
Department concerned. In this context “qualified teacher” means the faculty member possessing
(i) PG degree or (ii) Ph.D. degree.
The Project Work carried out in industry/academic/research institutions. In such cases, the
Project Work shall be jointly supervised by a supervisor of the department and an expert as a joint
supervisor from the organization and the student shall be instructed to meet the supervisor
periodically and to attend the review committee meetings for evaluating the progress. The review
meetings, if necessary, may also be arranged in online mode with prior approval from the Head of
the Institution and suitable record of the meetings shall be maintained.
The Head of the Institutions shall constitute a review committee for Project Work for each
programme. The review committee consists of supervisor, an expert from the Department and a
project coordinator from the Department. If the project coordinator/expert member happens to be the
supervisor, then an alternate member shall be nominated. In the case of Industrial Project, the review
committee shall have the supervisor, the coordinator from industry and the project coordinator from
the Department. There shall be three reviews conducted by the review committee. The student shall
make presentation on the progress made by him / her before the committee. The total marks
obtained in the three reviews shall be reduced for 60 marks and rounded to the nearest integer.
The project report shall carry a maximum of 10 marks. The project report shall be submitted
as per the approved guidelines as given by the Director, Centre for Academic Courses. Same marks
shall be awarded to every student within the project group for the project report. The viva-voce
examination shall carry 30 marks. Marks are awarded to each student of the project group is based
on the individual performance in the viva-voce examination.

Continuous Assessment End Semester Examinations

(60 Marks) (40 Marks)
Review I Review II Review III Project Viva-Voce Examination
Report
20 20 20 External Internal External Supervisor
10 10 10 10
In the case of industrial projects, the marks allotted for supervisor will be shared equally by the
supervisor from the Department and coordinator from Industry.

The last date for submission of the project report is on the last working day of the semester. If a
student fails to submit the project report on or before the specified deadline, it will be considered as
fail in the Project Work and the student shall re-register for the same in the subsequent semester.
Tentative date for reviews:

Review Date

0th Review 13.02.2025

1st Review 13.03.2025

2nd Review 22.04.2025

3rd Review 21.05.2025

Final Model Review 29.05.2025

 FORM – I Use)
Batch
FINAL YEAR STUDENT PROJECT – BATCH DETAILS Number

Details Student Student Student Student

S. No Detail Detail Detail Detail
1 Name
2 Register Number
Address
City
3 Pin Code

4 Phone
5 E-Mail ID

6 Area of Interest
Number of
7 Paper(s)
Presented
Number of
8 Mini Project(s)
Done
Prize(s) won
9 (if any)
Achievement(s)
10 (if any)

Passport
11 Size photo

12 Signature
1. Batch Details:

2. Project Area:
3. Project Details:

4. Supervisor: Internal -
External -

Date: Name and Signature of Internal Supervisor

 FORM – II

FINAL YEAR STUDENT PROJECT – SUPERVISOR DETAILS

S. NO DETAILS INTERNAL SUPERVISOR EXTERNAL SUPERVISOR

1 NAME

2 DESIGNATION

3 QUALIFICATION

4 ORGANIZATION

5 ADDRESS

6 CITY

7 STATE

8 PIN CODE

9 TELEPHONE
OFFICE
10 TELEPHONE
PERSONAL
11 E-MAIL

12 FAX

13 OFFICE WEB-
SITE
14 EXPERIENCE

(To be filled in all caps)

 FORM – III

FINAL YEAR STUDENT PROJECT – COMPANY DETAILS

(Applicable for Students Undertaking Industrial Projects)

1. Name of the Company :

2. Contact Details :
a. Name of Contact Person :
b. Designation :
c. Office Phone :
d. E-Mail ID :
3. Address of the Company :

Head Where the

S. No Details
Office Project Work
Assigned
1 Address
2 City
3 State
4 Pin Code
5 Phone Number
6 FAX
7 Web-Site

4 Referred
i. Name :
ii. Contact :
iii. Related by :
5. Type of Company:
i. Government / Public/Private :
ii. R&D / Product Development :
iii. Hardware / Software :

6. Year of Established :

7. Number of Employee(approx.) :

8. Annual Revenue(if any) :

Name and Signature of the External Supervisor

 FORM IV
PROJECT OVERVIEW

1. Batch Number :

2. Title of the Project (tentative) :

3. Internal Supervisor :

4. External Supervisor (if any) :

5. Name of the Company :
(If the Project done in Company)

6. Project Duration (tentative) :

7. Existing Technology
(if any):

8. Hardware Requirements :

9. Software Requirement(s) :
(if any)

10. Cost of the Project:

(approximated estimation)

11. Real Time application:(if any)

Signature of Students:

Signature of Supervisor: HOD

ABSTRACT (After completion of 3rd review)

Approved by Supervisor:
 Attendance
Weekly work done sheet

DAYS REMARKS

DAY 1

DAY 2

DAY 3

DAY 4

DAY 5

DAY 6

DAY 7

Signature of the Supervisor

 Attendance
Weekly work done sheet

DAYS REMARKS

DAY 1

DAY 2

DAY 3

DAY 4

DAY 5

DAY 6

DAY 7

Signature of the Supervisor

 Attendance
Weekly work done sheet

DAYS REMARKS

DAY 1

DAY 2

DAY 3

DAY 4

DAY 5

DAY 6

DAY 7

Signature of the Supervisor

 Attendance
Weekly work done sheet

DAYS REMARKS

DAY 1

DAY 2

DAY 3

DAY 4

DAY 5

DAY 6

DAY 7

Signature of the Supervisor

 Attendance
Weekly work done sheet

DAYS REMARKS

DAY 1

DAY 2

DAY 3

DAY 4

DAY 5

DAY 6

DAY 7

Signature of the Supervisor

 Attendance
Weekly work done sheet

DAYS REMARKS

DAY 1

DAY 2

DAY 3

DAY 4

DAY 5

DAY 6

DAY 7

Signature of the Supervisor

 Attendance
Weekly work done sheet

DAYS REMARKS

DAY 1

DAY 2

DAY 3

DAY 4

DAY 5

DAY 6

DAY 7

Signature of the Supervisor

 Attendance
Weekly work done sheet

DAYS REMARKS

DAY 1

DAY 2

DAY 3

DAY 4

DAY 5

DAY 6

DAY 7

Signature of the Supervisor

 Attendance
Weekly work done sheet

DAYS REMARKS

DAY 1

DAY 2

DAY 3

DAY 4

DAY 5

DAY 6

DAY 7

Signature of the Supervisor

 Attendance
Weekly work done sheet

DAYS REMARKS

DAY 1

DAY 2

DAY 3

DAY 4

DAY 5

DAY 6

DAY 7

Signature of the Supervisor

 Attendance
Weekly work done sheet

DAYS REMARKS

DAY 1

DAY 2

DAY 3

DAY 4

DAY 5

DAY 6

DAY 7

Signature of the Supervisor

 Attendance
Weekly work done sheet

DAYS REMARKS

DAY 1

DAY 2

DAY 3

DAY 4

DAY 5

DAY 6

DAY 7

Signature of the Supervisor

 RUBRIC FOR EVALUATING A PROJECT

Project Evaluation Rubric

Needs Weight
Criteria Exceptional (4) Proficient (3) Developing (2)
Improvement (1) (%)
The project has a
The objective is The objective is The objective is
Clarity of clearly stated and
clear but lacks some vague or not missing or 15%
Objective well-defined
specificity. entirely clear. unclear.
objective.
Demonstrates
thorough Accurate and Contains major
Content Contains minor
understanding of the reasonably thorough inaccuracies or
Accuracy and inaccuracies or 20%
topic with accurate but lacks some incomplete
Depth insufficient depth.
information and depth. content.
significant depth.
Demonstrates
Highly creative,
creativity and Some creativity, Minimal
Creativity and original, and
originality with but the approach is creativity, lacking 15%
Innovation innovative approach
some innovative conventional. originality.
to the topic.
aspects.
Clear organization
Exceptionally well- Somewhat
Organization with minor Poorly organized,
organized and organized but 10%
and Structure inconsistencies in difficult to follow.
logically structured. lacks logical flow.
structure.
Visually appealing, Design is basic
Visual Design Good visual design, Poor design,
professional, and and does not fully
and supports distracts from the 10%
effectively enhances support
Presentation understanding well. content.
understanding. understanding.
Extensive research Adequate research Limited research, Minimal or no
Research and
with high-quality and with reliable some sources may research, poorly
Supporting 15%
properly cited sources and proper be unreliable or cited or missing
Evidence
sources. citations. improperly cited. sources.
Team collaborated Team worked well Uneven Minimal
Teamwork and
effectively, with clear together with minor collaboration, collaboration,
Collaboration 10%
roles and excellent issues in roles or some members significant
(if applicable)
communication. communication. contributed less. teamwork issues.
Project exceeds
Project meets Project is
expectations and Project is average
Overall Impact expectations and is underwhelming 15%
leaves a lasting with some impact.
impactful. and lacks impact.
impression.
 Project Mark Report

Name of the Student: Reg. no:

Performance Levels
Criteria
Type of Date (Max. of 20 marks for Not Marks
Excellent Good Fair
Review each one) Good (100)
(20) (15) (10)
(5)
[Link] Survey
and need of the Project
[Link] selection
01 [Link] definition
[Link]
[Link] to
answer
[Link] System
&proposed system
[Link] of
project
02
[Link] Diagram
[Link] Used
[Link] Skill
[Link]
diagram
explanation
[Link] Principle
[Link]/Software
03 [Link]
Contribution
[Link] of
software system
/Module working and
Functioning
[Link]
[Link],
Conclusion and
Discussion
Model
3. Future work
[Link]
[Link] of
prototype or real
 Project Mark Report

Name of the Student: Reg. no:

Performance Levels
Criteria
Type of Date (Max. of 20 marks for Not Marks
Excellent Good Fair
Review each one) Good (100)
(20) (15) (10)
(5)
[Link] Survey
and need of the Project
[Link] selection
01 [Link] definition
[Link]
[Link] to
answer
[Link] System
&proposed system
[Link] of
project
02
[Link] Diagram
[Link] Used
[Link] Skill
[Link]
diagram
explanation
[Link] Principle
[Link]/Software
03 [Link]
Contribution
[Link] of
software system
/Module working and
Functioning
[Link]
[Link],
Conclusion and
Discussion
Model
3. Future work
[Link]
[Link] of
prototype or real
 Project Mark Report

Name of the Student: Reg. no:

Performance Levels
Criteria
Type of Date (Max. of 20 marks for Not Marks
Excellent Good Fair
Review each one) Good (100)
(20) (15) (10)
(5)
[Link] Survey
and need of the Project
[Link] selection
01 [Link] definition
[Link]
[Link] to
answer
[Link] System
&proposed system
[Link] of
project
02
[Link] Diagram
[Link] Used
[Link] Skill
[Link]
diagram
explanation
[Link] Principle
[Link]/Software
03 [Link]
Contribution
[Link] of
software system
/Module working and
Functioning
[Link]
[Link],
Conclusion and
Discussion
Model
3. Future work
[Link]
[Link] of
prototype or real
 Project Mark Report

Name of the Student: Reg. no:

Performance Levels
Criteria
Type of Date (Max. of 20 marks for Not Marks
Excellent Good Fair
Review each one) Good (100)
(20) (15) (10)
(5)
[Link] Survey
and need of the Project
[Link] selection
01 [Link] definition
[Link]
[Link] to
answer
[Link] System
&proposed system
[Link] of
project
02
[Link] Diagram
[Link] Used
[Link] Skill
[Link]
diagram
explanation
[Link] Principle
[Link]/Software
03 [Link]
Contribution
[Link] of
software system
/Module working and
Functioning
[Link]
[Link],
Conclusion and
Discussion
Model
3. Future work
[Link]
[Link] of
prototype or real
ANNEXURE
 FORM – V (01 – Review)

FINAL YEAR STUDENT PROJECT – REVIEW FORM

1. Review Number Model Presentation : I - Review / II - Review / III - Review

2. Batch Number :

3. Student Name(s) :

4. Project Title :

5. Name of Guide :

6. Percentage of Project completion :

7. Work done for this review :

8. Documentation Completion(in pages) :

9. Referred Books:

10. Referred Journals

11. Referred Websites:

Signature of Student Signature of Supervisor

Reviewer comments:

Signature of reviewer

Signature of Supervisor Signature of HOD

 FORM – V (02 – Review)

FINAL YEAR STUDENT PROJECT – REVIEW FORM

1. Review Number Model Presentation : I - Review / II - Review / III - Review

2. Batch Number :

3. Student Name(s) :

4. Project Title :

5. Name of Guide :

6. Percentage of Project completion :

7. Work done for this review :

8. Documentation Completion(in pages):

9. Referred Books:

10. Referred Journals

11. Referred Websites:

Signature of Student Signature of Supervisor

Reviewer comments:

Signature of reviewer

Signature of Supervisor Signature of HOD

 FORM – V (03 – Review)

FINAL YEAR STUDENT PROJECT – REVIEW FORM

1. Review Number Model Presentation : I - Review / II - Review / III - Review

2. Batch Number :

3. Student Name(s) :

4. Project Title :

5. Name of Guide :

6. Percentage of Project completion :

7. Work done for this review :

8. Documentation Completion(in pages):

9. Referred Books:

10. Referred Journals

11. Referred Websites:

Signature of Student Signature of Supervisor

Reviewer comments:

Signature of reviewer

Signature of Supervisor Signature of HOD

 FORM – V (Model)

FINAL YEAR STUDENT PROJECT – REVIEW FORM

1. Review Number Model Presentation : Model Review

2. Batch Number :

3. Student Name(s) :

4. Project Title :

5. Name of Guide :

6. Percentage of Project completion :

7. Work done for this review :

8. Documentation Completion(in pages):

9. Referred Books:

10. Referred Journals

11. Referred Websites:

Signature of Student Signature of Supervisor

Reviewer comments:

Signature of reviewer

Signature of Supervisor Signature of HOD

 FORM VI

LIST OF PUBLICATIONS/IPRS

Research Papers Published:

National/ International Journal / Conference Publication:
(Title of the paper, name of the journal, volume number, issue number, page number, year of publication)

1)

2)

3)

4)

Patent Filed:

1)

2)

3)

4)

Future Scope of the Project:

Signature of Supervisor Signature of HOD

 Department of FOOD TECHNOLOGY

Vision of the Institute:

To be world class nodal centre committed to advanced learning, research

and training to serve the nation, meeting the national / international standards

Mission of the Institute:

To be a premier Engineering College, much sought after by the industries

and society offering professional education and training blended with ethical

values to convert student resource into strong assets of our nation

Vision of the Department:

To produce knowledgeable graduates capable of solving major societal

issues technical challenges around food processing and associated industries

through systematic approaches.

Mission of the Department:

M1: To excel in teaching by offering professional education imbibing ethical

and moral values.

M2: To produce technically strong engineers who could excel in research,

development and food technology related fields.

Program Educational Objectives (PEOs):

The PEOs are to facilitate graduating students to:

PEO 1: To prepare students as a qualified food technologists for Food industries, research
organization and teaching.

PEO 2: To provide students with a solid foundation in basic sciences related to food
technology, food science and food technology & engineering.

PEO 3: To enable the students with good scientific and engineering knowledge so as to
comprehend, design, and create food products and device for food industry and provide
solutions for the challenges in food industry as well as in agriculture.

PEO 4: To train students in professional and ethical attitude, effective communication skills,
teamwork skills and multidisciplinary approaches related to food technology and engineering.

PEO 5:To provide student with an academic environment aware of excellence, leadership,
written ethical codes and guidelines, and the life-long learning needed for a successful
professional career.