FINAL REPORT OF THE TRAINING PROCESS
GENERAL DATA OF THE TRAINING COURSE
Name of the
Lic. Armando Enrique Sosa Mejia
instructor
Company /
Azteca University
institution
Number of
10
participants
Place(s) Computer Lab Room 1
Date(s)
COMMENTS ON THE TEACHING-LEARNING PROCESS
In this section, describe the actions regarding the experiences that were had.
regarding the training process.
COMMENTS ABOUT THE SESSION.
The session started with a delay of 15 minutes due to the postponement in
previous session times.
In general, the session was conducted according to the established times.
the instruction guide.
No contingencies were presented regarding the material or the facilities.
2. COMMENTS ABOUT THE GROUP.
The participants showed willingness to participate in each of the
activities.
No roles were identified because each of them cooperated in a way
opportune in the development of the session.
GENERAL OBSERVATIONS TO THE GROUP
Describa las “áreas de oportunidad” detectadas y las “mejores prácticas” observadas
throughout the evaluation process.
AREAS OF OPPORTUNITY BEST PRACTICES
Linking concepts with activities
Good participation
practices.
Proper management of language at the level Respect
bachelor's degree
Tolerance to the opinions of others
companions
PRESENTED CONTINGENCIES
FINAL REPORT OF THE TRAINING PROCESS
Describe any type of contingency or problem presented before, during and
after the course, as well as the corrective actions or agreements generated.
CONTINGENCY CORRECTIVE ACTION FOR THE
CONTINGENCY PRESENTED
Before the session: delay in the
opening
None
No contingencies during or after
of the session
ADJUSTMENTS TO THE WORK PROGRAM / EXPECTATIONS
Record the adjusted aspects, the implemented modification, and your comment in
reference to what was experienced during the evaluation process. In case of not
If any of them have been submitted, fill in the space with N/A.
MODIFICATIONS
ASPECT COMMENTS
CARRIED OUT
Date, time 15 minutes delay Waiting for the evaluator
Place
Objectives
particular/specific
s
Actividades
Without modifications
Materials
Techniques and
instruments of
evaluation
Others
FINAL REPORT OF THE TRAINING PROCESS
LEVEL OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE OBJECTIVES
Argue the achievement of the objectives set for the course taught, as well as the
criteria taken into account to assert their achievement.
GENERAL OBJECTIVE
The general objective was met because the participants carried it out efficiently.
word search using the text functions of MS Office Excel
SPECIFIC OBJECTIVE
The first specific objective was achieved because the
basic concepts of MS Office Excel for development of the
activity
The second specific objective was met since it was recognized the
difference between formula and function by the participants
The third specific objective was achieved because the participants
they applied the functions for the development of the word search using
MS Office Excel
Final comments on why the stated objectives were not achieved for the
present course
No comments
RESULTS OF THE EVALUATIONS CARRIED OUT ON THE PARTICIPANTS
KNOWLEDGE/ PERFORMANCE/ ATTITUDES/ PRODUCTS
First and Last Names Assessment Final Evaluation Average
Diagnostics
1.- Viridiana Alpizar Hernández 33 60 47
2.- Diana Pérez Serrano 33 80 57
3.- María del Carmen Hernández 53 73 63
4.- Melyza Ramos García 60 87 74
5.- Gloria Adilene Cruz León 53 87 70
6.- Liliana Santiago Bonilla 60 87 74
7.- Rosa Adriana Martínez Moreno 73 80 77
8.- Tania Martínez Sánchez 47 73 60
9.- María del Carmen V. González 40 80 60
10.- Rebeca Vega Guzmán 33 87 60
Value of the Evaluation Value of the Total
Diagnostics Evaluation
final
50% 50% 100%
FINAL REPORT OF THE TRAINING PROCESS
Interpretation of the evaluations conducted with the participants
Specify the progress made with Indicate the deviations
relationship to the results of presented.
planned learning.
Regarding the average of the evaluation
diagnostics is determined 4.8, above A general average of
the final evaluation is determined 6.4 due to poor performance
as can be observed a diagnosis.
increase of 3.1.
FINAL REPORT OF THE TRAINING PROCESS
RESULTS OF THE SATISFACTION EVALUATION OF THE
PARTICIPANTS
SUGGESTIONS AND/OR RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE PARTICIPANTS FOR
IMPROVE THE COURSE
In this section document and describe the suggestions and/or comments made.
by the participants to improve the current course.
More examples and interaction with the students were needed.
Raise the tone of voice a bit more.
The startup dynamics must be more interactive.
FINAL REPORT OF THE TRAINING PROCESS
PRODUCTS OR EVIDENCES GENERATED
State the evidence or products generated during the training process.
PERSONAS
QUANTITY DESCRIPTION COMMENT
INVOLVED
10 Diagnostic exam Participants
1 Attendance list Participants
10 Apprenticeship contracts Participants
10 Commitment format Participants
10 Final evaluation Participants
10 Satisfaction surveys Participants
REPORT DELIVERY DATE INSTRUCTOR'S SIGNATURE