Flight Instructor Seminar June 2012
Flight Instructor Seminar / Chicago, June 13th and 14th, 2012
Circling
Presented by
Capt. David Owens / Senior Director Flight Crew Training Policy
Flight Instructor Seminar June 2012
Content
• What is the issue? - Case Study
• What are the rules?
• How should we fly a circle to land?
• Conclusions
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document. Page 2
Flight Instructor Seminar June 2012
What is the issue?
• Circling approach is nothing new – always a challenge
• Used to be frequent and normal operations
• Today, not as frequent and no longer recurrent training
for everyone
• Is this a risk?
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document. Page 3
Flight Instructor Seminar June 2012
Case Study - Synopsis
• Aircraft carried out an ILS approach to runway 36 to be
followed by a circling approach to runway 18
• After 45° break off, the downwind leg was not performed and
aircraft continued in approximate straight flight
• Several TAWS cautions and warnings were triggered without
adequate crew reaction
• Aircraft flew into terrain, no survivors were reported
• CPT experience 25 000h (1000h on type), F/O 2 000h (300h
on type)
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document. Page 4
Flight Instructor Seminar June 2012
Case Study - Circling approach
• At MDA circling
• Level off using FCU altitude
• AP1 in ALT / HDG mode
• After the 45° break off, track was maintained with no downwind leg established
• SEC-FPLN (including pilot waypoints) activated
• 4.5NM on the 45° break off track, NAV mode engaged
• 2 minutes before impact, approaching mountainous area,
several TAWS cautions and warning were triggered, with no
adequate flight path correction taken.
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document. Page 5
Flight Instructor Seminar June 2012
Case Study - Event Vs SOP
• No adequate response
to multiple TAWS alerts WPT2
15x TAWS warnings
5x TAWS cautions
WPT1
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document. Page 6
Flight Instructor Seminar June 2012
What is a circling approach?
“When landing runway is different from instrument
approach RWY”
45°
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document. Page 7
Flight Instructor Seminar June 2012
Content
• What is the issue? - Case Study
• What are the rules?
• How should we fly a circle to land?
• Conclusions
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document. Page 8
Flight Instructor Seminar June 2012
Circling approach rules
45°
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document. Page 9
Flight Instructor Seminar June 2012
Circling approach rules
45°
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document. Page 10
Flight Instructor Seminar June 2012
What about the missed approach?
45°
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document. Page 11
Flight Instructor Seminar June 2012
TERPS vs PANS-OPS is very serious for a pilot.
• How do you know whether a procedure is T or P?
• Airports in the same country do not use the same design
criteria, (CIVIL: Pans-Ops, MIL: Terps)
• Not all chart providers publish the information on their charts
TERPS? PANS OPS?
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document. Page 12
Flight Instructor Seminar June 2012
Circling approach rules - Minimum Obstacle Clearance
The manoeuvring area under TERPS is
! MUCH SMALLER than ICAO ones
A/C Cat A B C D E
PANS-OPS 295 ft 295ft 394ft 394ft 492ft
US –TERPS 300ft 300ft 300ft 300ft 300ft
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document. Page 13
Flight Instructor Seminar June 2012
TERPS vs PANS-OPS is a concern for a pilot.
FAA A/C n0 8260.3B US TERPS
A/C category A B C D E
Minimum
Visibility
1.9 km 2.8 km 3.7 km 4.6 km 6.5 km
PANS-OPS Minimum visibility ?
Minimum
Visibility 1.6 km 1.6 km 2.4 km 3.2 km 3.2 km
US TERPS
Minimum Visibility at OCA
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document. Page 14
Flight Instructor Seminar June 2012
Content
• What is the issue? - Case Study
• What are the rules?
• How should we fly a circle to land?
• Conclusions
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document. Page 15
Flight Instructor Seminar June 2012
Airbus published references
Rules – especially protected area FAA vs JAA
Reference source Airbus. FCOM, FCTM, BG
45°
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document. Page 16
Flight Instructor Seminar June 2012
Standard Circling Approach
Approach preparation
• Chart – protected area/terrain
• Approach configuration / MDA
• Preparation of SEC F-PLN (Copy active,
change runway to actual landing runway)
• Optimum use of ND
45°
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document. Page 17
Flight Instructor Seminar June 2012
Standard Circling Approach
45°
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document. Page 18
Flight Instructor Seminar June 2012
Standard Circling Approach
Instrument Approach
• Gear down, conf 3
• For an ILS use FD in HDG/VS
• NPA = TRK/FPA
45°
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document. Page 19
Flight Instructor Seminar June 2012
Standard Circling Approach
At MDA for circling
Level off and fly not lower than MDA The pilot is able to
determine his aircraft’s
(Anticipation, use of AP) position in relation to
the runway with the aid
• Push to level off or press ALT of the external
• Select TRK/FPA references. IEM to
Appendix 1 to JAR-OPS
• Arm 45 degree track 1.430, 4.2 and 3.2
• If visual: join downwind (visual?)
• Pull HDG for track
• If not visual; Go-around
45°
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document. Page 20
Flight Instructor Seminar June 2012
Standard Circling Approach
Timing for Circling
• 30 seconds from wings level
• Adjust for strong Head or Tail wind
• Use of ND
• Visual exercise – timings are approximate
45°
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document. Page 21
Flight Instructor Seminar June 2012
Standard Circling Approach
Downwind
• Maintain visual (Lateral distance and Track)
• Adjust Track for wind as necessary
• Activate SEC F-PLN (Keep DISCONTINUITY)
• Disconnect AP and remove FD when appropriate
(at the latest before any further descent)
When the secondary flight plan is activated, the valid
missed approach procedure is no longer available.
NAV In case of GO AROUND, it must be flown in SELECTED
mode as briefed.
45°
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document. Page 22
Flight Instructor Seminar June 2012
Standard Circling Approach
Downwind Abeam
• Start time abeam threshold (3 sec per 100 ft)
• What about airspeed/tail wind?
• Visual exercise – timings are approximate
• Use ND
ABM
45°
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document. Page 23
Flight Instructor Seminar June 2012
Use of ND for Situational Awareness
VISUAL, all timings are approximate,
use ND as a guide ONLY
•2.5 Nm offset?
•Position downwind?
•Track downwind?
•Abeam Threshold?
•Tailwind for timing?
•Crosswind?
•Terrain?
45°
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document. Page 24
Flight Instructor Seminar June 2012
Standard Circling Approach
Final turn
• Initially, maintain 25° bank
• Maintain altitude until runway threshold identified
• Set LDG configuration when appropriate
• Stable by 400ft AAL
45°
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document. Page 25
Flight Instructor Seminar June 2012
Standard Circling Approach
45°
400 ft AAL
stabilized
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document. Page 26
Flight Instructor Seminar June 2012
Standard Circling Approach
It is expected that the pilot
will make an initial climbing
turn toward the landing
runway and overhead the
aerodrome where he will
establish the aeroplane in a
climb on the missed
approach track.
IEM to Appendix 1 to JAR-
OPS 1.430, 3.1
45°
400 ft AAL
stabilized
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document. Page 27
Flight Instructor Seminar June 2012
Be aware of exceptions
Remember, in case of missed
approach…
Always fly the go-around of the
initial instrument approach.
Pilot is expected to manoeuvre
to enable this but always
within the protected area
45°
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document. Page 28
Flight Instructor Seminar June 2012
What about Engine Out?
In case of Engine Out…
• All aircraft – ref QRH
• Check table for weight (320/330)
• Delay gear
If the approach is flown at less than 750 ft
RA, the “L/G NOT DOWN” warning will be
triggered – can be cancelled.
NAV
The “TOO LOW GEAR” warning will be
triggered below 500 ft
45°
RA.
45°
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document. Page 29
Flight Instructor Seminar June 2012
Use of NAV?
Standard circle to land is visual,
NO Pilot WPTs (PBD)
NAV
NO NAV
NO AP below Circling minima
45°
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document. Page 30
Flight Instructor Seminar June 2012
Content
• What is the issue? - Case Study
• What are the rules?
• How should we fly a circle to land?
• Conclusions
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document. Page 31
Flight Instructor Seminar June 2012
Conclusion
• Airbus recommends all operators examine their
operation and training regarding circling approach
• What about RNP?
45°
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document. Page 32
Flight Instructor Seminar June 2012
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document. This document and all information contained herein is the sole property of AIRBUS S.A.S. No intellectual property rights are granted by the
delivery of this document or the disclosure of its content. This document shall not be reproduced or disclosed to a third party without the express written consent of AIRBUS S.A.S. This document and its content shall not be
used for any purpose other than that for which it is supplied. The statements made herein do not constitute an offer. They are based on the mentioned assumptions and are expressed in good faith. Where the supporting
grounds for these statements are not shown, AIRBUS S.A.S. will be pleased to explain the basis thereof.
AIRBUS, its logo, A300, A310, A318, A319, A320, A321, A330, A340, A350, A380, A400M are registered trademarks.
Page 33
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.