Time Value of Money in Accounting
Time Value of Money in Accounting
Introduction: -
The main goal of accounting is to prepare financial statements. These
statements should give a true and fair view of the business's operating results
and financial position. Financial statements are prepared using monetary units.
These statements work well if the value of these monetary units stays the same.
This is only possible when prices are stable. However, prices have not remained
stable over time. Inflation has become more common, especially after 1931.
Current financial statements do not show the current economic situation. In the
historical accounting system, accounts are prepared without considering price
level changes. Assets are shown at their purchase value, minus any depreciation.
Sales are recorded at market prices, while inventory is recorded at cost price.
Therefore, neither the profit and loss account nor the balance sheet accurately
reflects the business's position.
Price Level Accounting: -
Price level accounting is a technique used to restate financial statements. This
restatement reflects changes in the general price level. Such be inflation or
deflation. In general, price level accounting is more concerned with inflationary
tendencies.
Limitations of Conventional Financial Statements (Historical accounting):
1. Historical accounting fails to disclose current worth of the Enterprise: -
The Conventional financial statements are recording only the historical facts.
They don't give us the true current worth of the enterprise.
2. Non-comparable items: -
The financial statements contain items which are not comparable because they
belong to different time periods with different inflation values. For eg: If a
company constructed a building for a sum of $500,000 in the year 2000, and
again it constructed a similar building in 2018 at the cost of $1,000,000, the
total cost of the building will be shown in the balance sheet at the end of 2018
as follows.
for eg: An asset purchased for a sum of ₹50000 in 2000 would be valued in
2010 according to cpp method, at the amount which would be needed to buy the
2
same asset, as per change in the general price index in 2010 as compared to
2000. Assuming that general price index was 150 in 2000 and 300 in 2010, the
asset would be valued at;
Buildings (2000) ₹ 2,00,000
Buildings (2010) ₹ 1,50,000
3. Problem at the time of replacement: According to the conventional
method, depⁿ is charged on historical cost of the assets. It creates problem at the
time of replacement of that asset.
e.g. If a machinery was purchased for ₹1,00,000 and its life was expected to be
10 years, then the annual depⁿ will be ₹10,000. But after 10 years the same asset
can be purchased at a new price of ₹ 1,50,000, the firm may have to face
serious problems due to lack of funds.
4. Mixes holding gains and operating gains:
In Conventional accounting, gains on account of holding the inventories may be
mixed up with operating gains.
For Example: A business purchased 100 units of a product at ₹6/unit in 2010. It
could sell only 50 of such units in that year. In 2011 it purchased another 100
units at ₹8/unit and sells all 150 units at ₹10/unit.
In such a case, the profit in 2011 as per historical accounting will be as follows:
Sales (150 x 10) = 1500
(-) Cost of sales
(50 units x 6) + (100 x 8)
(300 + 800) = 1100
Profit = 400
As a matter of fact, out of the total profit of ₹400, a sum of ₹100 (50x2) is only
on account of holding the inventory. Thus, in this case ₹100 is a holding gain.
Profit and the remaining ₹300 is the operating Profit. In general, it can be said
that under inflationary Condition, the reported Copies. are over stated. and
assets are. Understated. When accounts are prepared according to historical
accounting, over reporting of profits gives rise to a no. of problems like heavy
3
taxation, higher dividend etc, resulting ultimately in heavy financial drain of the
company.
Methods of Accounting For changing prices:
I Current purchasing power method (CPP) General purchasing power method
(GPP).
II Current Cost accounting method (CCA)
[Link] method (mixture of CPP & CCA).
I current purchasing power method (CPP): The method of CPP was evolved
by The Institute of Chartered Accountants of England & Wales. by the use of
provisional statement of standard accounting practice. No.7 (SSAP-7) entitled
"Accounts for changes in purchasing power of the money" in 1974.
According to this method all items in the financial Statement are to be restated
for changes in the general price level. for this purpose, any approved price index
is used to convert the Various items of the profit and loss account and the
balance sheet.
It should be noted that under the cpp method, only the changes in general
purchasing power of money is taken into account. It doesn't consider the
changes in the value of individual asset. In other words, a particular asset might
have become cheaper over the years, whereas the general price index has
increased. In such a case the value of that asset will be increased as per this
method. In
preparation of financial statements according to cpp. method.
Step 1: Conversion factor
Conversion factor = price index at the date of Conversion / price index at the
date of item arose
The retail price index is considered to be appropriate price index under cpp
method.
Step 2: Mid period Conversion.
Some revenue transactions like sales, purchases, payment of Expenses etc.
occur throughout the year. In such cases, it will be advisable to convert them
according to the Average index of the Average period.
4
2. Increase in monetary
liability during 2010
[40000-35000]
5000x5/4 6250
on 31/12/2010 should
have stood at
(-) monetary liability
as on 31/12/2010
40000
actual stood at
18750
Gain on holding
monetary liability
3. Monetary assets as on
01-01-2010
[5000+20000] should
have gone up to
25000x3/2 37500
4. Increase in monetary
assets during
2010[35000-25000]
Which should have
gone up by
10000x5/4 12500
50000
Monetary assets as on
31/12/2010 should 35000
have stood at
Monetary asset as on
31/12/2010
15000
Loss on holding
monetary
2. Ascertain the net monetary result at the end of 2010 from the under mention that
Particular 1-1-2010 31-12-2010
Bank 2000 3000
a/c’s receivable 10000 12000
a/c’s payable 15000 10000
2010’s start index – 100
2010 end index – 200
2010 avg index – 160
Solution
7
Statement showing the net monetary result on a/c of price level changes.
Particular
1. Monetary liability as on 1-1-2010
should have gone upto
15000 x 2 30000
(-) increase/decrease in monetary
liability during 2010[15000-10000]
6250
5000x5/4
These values depend on which method of pricing the materials issued has been
adopted by the firm, i.e., FIFO or LIFO method. While restating the figures
under CPP method, we should keep in mind the method of pricing the issues
because they affect both the Cost of Sales and Closing Inventory. The following
explanation will prove the statement:
FIFO method;
a) Cost of Sales: It comprises the entire opening stock and current purchases
less closing stock.
b) Closing Inventory: It comprises entirely current purchases. However, in rare
cases, if the total sales are less than the opening stock, a part of the op-stock
may also become a part of the cl-stock.
LIFO method:
a) Cost of Sales: It comprises current purchases only. However, if the current
purchases are less than the Cost of Sale, a part of the op-stock may also become
a part of the Cost of Sales.
b) Closing Inventory: It comprises purchases made in the previous year of
year's.
The following indices are used under CPP method for restating the historical
figure:
(i) For current purchases; avg index of the year
(ii) For op-stock; index at the beginning of the year
(iii). For the purchases of the previous year; avg index of the previous year....
[Link] the following details ascertain:
1. Cost of sales
2. Closing inventory as per CPP method when the firm is following (FIFO)Method.
Historical Cost Price Index
[Link] on 1-1-2010 4000 80
Purchases during 2010 20000 125
[Link] (out of purchases
made in last total) 3000 120
index number on 31-12- - 140
2010
9
Solution
Statement showing the cost of sales and closing inventory under CPP Method following
FIFO
Particular Historical Conversion Converted
cost Factor Amt
Opening Stock 4000 140 = 7 4000 x 7/4
80 4 7000
(+) Purchases 20000 140 = 28
125 25 22400
24000 29400
(-) Closing Inventory 3000 140 = 7
120 6 3500
Cost of sales 21000 25900
Cost of sales = 25900
[Link] = 3500
4. From the following data calculate:
a. Cost of sales
b. [Link] under CPP method presuming that the firm is following LIFO Method for
inventory valuation method.
Particular
Inventory as on 1-1-2000 Rs. 8000
Purchase during 2000 Rs. 48000
Inventory as on 31-12-2000 Rs. 12000
Price index as on 1-1-2000 Rs.100
Price index as on 31-12-2000 Rs. 140
Avg price index for 2000 Rs. 125
Solution
Statement showing the cost of sales and cl. inventory under CPP Method following LIFO
Method.
Particulars Historical Cost C.F Converted Amt
Opening Stock 8000 140 = 7 11200
100 5
(+) Purchases 48000 140 = 28 53760
125 25
56000 64960
(-) [Link] 12000
8000 Rs. Stock is
out of [Link] 8000x7
5
= 11200
The remaining Rs. 4000 x 28
4000 is out of 25 15680
current purchases = 4480
Cost of Sales 44000 49280
10
(v) Gain of loss on sale of monetary items should be calculated & stated
separately restated income statement to arrive at the overall figure of profit &
loss.
[Link] balance sheet of as on 1-1-2010 and the income statement for the year ending 31-
12-2010 are set out below.
Drs and credit balances remain constant throughout the year: General price indices as
given below :
on 1-1-2010 = 200
Avg index for the year = 240
On 31-12-2010 = 300
Your required to prepare the final a/c for the year 2010 after adjusting the price level
change under CPP Method.
Solution:
Calculation of C.F
C.F. for the item as on 1-1-2010 = price index at the date of conversion
Price index at the date of arose.
12
Working Note :
1. For all monetary items ie monetary assets & monetary liabilities at the closing B/S
should be converted at end year interest (c.f. 1)
Equity Share
Equipment 210000 270000
Reserve &
surplus - 50000
Equipment costing Rs. 60000 was acquired on 1-7-2001, when the general price index was
157.5. The amount of deprecition has been calculated as follows :
10% on Rs. 210000 - Rs. 21000
5% on Rs. 60000
(rate being 10% p.a) - Rs. 3000
Total depn - Rs. 24000
=======
Sales, purchases, operating Expenses took place evenly throughout the year.
Inventories are priced according FIFO method. goods in closing inventories
where acquired evenly throughout the year. the dividend of 40000 was declared
and paid at the end of 2001. Income tax accrued throughout the year.
your required recent above the statement taking into account the price level
adjustment under cpp method.
The general price indices are as follows: at the end of the year 2000
(beginning of the year 2001) -> 150
Average for the year 2001 -> 157.5
at the end of the year 2001 -> 163.8.
15
solution:
Calculation of conversion factor
Conversion factor for the appearing at the begging = price index at the date of conversion
Price index at the date the item arose.
1-1-2001 = 163.8
150 = 1.092
Conversion factor for the items appearing throughout the year = 163.8
157.5 = 1.04
Co n.f for the item appearing at the end of the year = 163.8
163.8 = 1
Restated income statement under CPP Method
Particular Historical Cost C.F CPP
Sales 800000 1.04 832000
(-) Cost of Sales ;-
Opening inventory 150000 1.092 163800
(+)purchase 500000 1.04 520000
650000 688800
(-) Cl. Inventory 130000 1.04 135200
Cost of sale 520000 548600
Gross Profit 280000 283400
(-) Operating
Expenses (Excluding
depn) 96000 1.04 99840
Deprn 24000 21000 x 1.092
= 22932
3000 x 1.04
3120 26052
Income for price
level gain 160000 157508
General price level
gain/loss - 4800
Income before price
level gain/loss 160000 152708
(-) Income Tax 70000 1.04 72800
Income after tax 90000 79908
(-) Dividend paid 40000 1 40000
Retained Earnings 50000 39908
Statement showing the monetary gain or loss
Particular Historical Cost C.F Converted Amt
Net Monitary Assest
as onn 1-1-01.
(Total Monetary
asset – Total
16
It refers to the fund required to buy a new asset of the same [Link] than that
recognizes the fact that the true replacement of the asset would not be a new
asset, but an asset which has the same remaining useful life as an existing asset.
It is also known as current entry price/value.
(b) Net Realizable Value:
This is the value which is represented by the Net Cash proceeds, if the existing
assets is sold now. It is known as current exit price/value.
(c) Economic Value:
It is the net present value (NPV) of the cash inflows of holding and using an
asset. In other words, it refers to present value of the Net income that will be
earned for using the existing assets, during the rest of its life. However, the
income will be discounted at a proper rate to arrive at the present value of the
future cash inflows.
To sum up, replacement cost is a significant method under CCA method.
Problem 1:
From the data given below calculate COSA
19
Calculation Steps:
1. 50,000−40,000=10,000
2. Calculate stock in index:
50,000220=227.272
40,000180=222.22
227.27−222.22=5.05
3. Multiply by average index:
198×5.05=999.9
4. Subtract this from initial stock change:
10,000−999.9=9,000.1
COSA=9,000.1
20
Problem 2
From the following information, calculate COSA.
Particulars
Ⅱ Depreciation Adjustment
(a) On which value to calculate dep’n:
Under CCA method dep,n is calculated on replacement cost. But the problem is
replacement cost changes day by day. The usual custom is that the avg
replacement cost is taken for calculating dep’n under CCA method.
If Index Numbers are used to obtain replacement cost, then average Index of the
year should be used to obtain the value for calculating dep’n.
(b) Dep’n adjustment:
Dep’n adjustment = CCA dep’n - HCA dep’nn
This adjustment reflects the amt of additional finance needed for monetary w. Capital as a
result of changes in the input prices of goods and services used by the business.
There are difficulties in practice in identifying the monetary assets and liabilities reasonable
accuracy and objectivity however can be achieved by including only trade debtors and
creditors with in monetary working capital.
D) Gearing Adjustment
Gearing adjustment is a different type of adjustment compared to the Cartier 3 adjustments.
This adjustment is necessary because a part of a net operating assets are financed by
borrowing which are to be repaid in the same monetary amount, irrespective of changes in
price, for the purpose of gearing adjustment the form "Shareholders fund" refers to all funds,
belonging to the Shareholders as per CCA.
22
When the business is financed not only by the Shareholders but also by borrowings from
long term lenders. The burden of CE adjustments should be shared by both the Shareholders
as well as long term lenders -
Assets
Liabilities
PROBLEM NO 2
25
The company facts and figures extracted from the balance sheet of Arun ltd as on
31/12/2024
Particular Amount
Bank and cash 4,50,000
Current liabilities
Creditors (Hire purchase) 170000
Taxation 210000
Proposed dividend 250000
BOD 190000
Share holders fund 354000
Net assets employed 268000
Debentures 540000
Deferred taxation 320000
Calculate current cost gearing ratio and proportion
Solution
Calculation of net borrowings
particular Amount
Debentures 540000
BOD 190000
Creditors 170000
Taxation 210000
Deferred taxation 320000
Less
Bank and cash 450000
2930000
26
MCQ
d) Consistency in values
Answer: c) Non-comparability due to inflation
10. In CPP method, revenue transactions occurring throughout the year are converted at:
a) Opening index
b) Closing index
c) Average index
d) Historical value
Answer: c) Average index
b) Market price
c) Present value of future cash inflows
d) Net realizable value
Answer: c) Present value of future cash inflows
8 MARKS QUESTIONS
[Link] is the Current Purchasing Power (CPP) method? Explain the steps involved in
preparing financial statements under this method.
[Link] the Current Cost Accounting (CCA) method and explain the various adjustments
required in preparing income statements under this method.
[Link] balance sheet of as on 1-1-2010 and the income statement for the year ending 31-12-
2010 are set out below.
Drs and credit balances remain constant throughout the year: General price indices as
given below :
on 1-1-2010 = 200
Avg index for the year = 240
On 31-12-2010 = 300
Your required to prepare the final a/c for the year 2010 after adjusting the price level
change under CPP Method.
Solution:
Calculation of C.F
C.F. for the item as on 1-1-2010 = price index at the date of conversion
Price index at the date of arose.
C.F. as on 1-1-2010 = 300 = 3
200 2
c.f for the item as on
during the year = 300 = 5
240 4
C.F as on 31-12-2010= 300 = 1
300
Net Monetary
liability as on 1-1-
2010 7400 3/2 11100
(+) purchases 4600 5/4 5750
Operating exp 800 5/4 1000
Int on debenture 600 1 600
13400 18450
(-) Sales 10000 5/4 12500
Net Monetary
Liability as on 31-
12-2010 3400 5950
(-) Net Monetary
liability on 31-12-
2010 on Historical
cost basis 3400
Resultant Monetary
Gain 2550
Calculation of Net Monetary liability as on 1-1-2010
240 4
c.f for the end of year = 1.
Statement showing the net monetary result on account of price level changes.
Particular RS RS
5. Monetary liabilities 52500
as on 1-1-2010
should have gone
upto
[15000+20000]
35000x3
2
6. Increase in monetary
liability during 2010
[40000-35000]
5000x5/4 6250
50000
Monetary assets as on
31/12/2010 should 35000
have stood at
34
Monetary asset as on
31/12/2010
15000
Loss on holding
monetary
6.
. Ascertain the net monetary result at the end of 2010 from the under mention that
Particular 1-1-2010 31-12-2010
Bank 2000 3000
a/c’s receivable 10000 12000
a/c’s payable 15000 10000
2010’s start index – 100
2010 end index – 200
2010 avg index – 160
Solution
Calculation of conversion factor
c.f as on 1-1-2010 = 200 = 2 = 2
100 1
C.f as on 31-12-2010 = 200 = 1
200
c.f as during the year = 200 = 5
160 4
==
Statement showing the net monetary result on a/c of price level changes.
Particular
1. Monetary liability as on 1-1-2010
should have gone upto
15000 x 2 30000
(-) increase/decrease in monetary
liability during 2010[15000-10000]
6250
5000x5/4
Solution
Statement showing the cost of sales and closing inventory under CPP Method following
FIFO
Particular Historical Conversion Converted
cost Factor Amt
Opening Stock 4000 140 = 7 4000 x 7/4
80 4 7000
(+) Purchases 20000 140 = 28
125 25 22400
24000 29400
(-) Closing Inventory 3000 140 = 7
120 6 3500
Cost of sales 21000 25900
Cost of sales = 25900
[Link] = 3500
36
c. Cost of sales
d. [Link] under CPP method presuming that the firm is following LIFO Method for
inventory valuation method.
Particular
Inventory as on 1-1-2000 Rs. 8000
Purchase during 2000 Rs. 48000
Inventory as on 31-12-2000 Rs. 12000
Price index as on 1-1-2000 Rs.100
Price index as on 31-12-2000 Rs. 140
Avg price index for 2000 Rs. 125
Solution
Statement showing the cost of sales and cl. inventory under CPP Method following LIFO
Method.
Particulars Historical Cost C.F Converted Amt
Opening Stock 8000 140 = 7 11200
100 5
(+) Purchases 48000 140 = 28 53760
125 25
56000 64960
(-) [Link] 12000
8000 Rs. Stock is
out of [Link] 8000x7
5
= 11200
The remaining Rs. 4000 x 28
4000 is out of 25 15680
current purchases = 4480
Cost of Sales 44000 49280
Equity Share
37
Reserve &
surplus - 50000
Equipment costing Rs. 60000 was acquired on 1-7-2001, when the general price index was
157.5. The amount of deprecition has been calculated as follows :
10% on Rs. 210000 - Rs. 21000
5% on Rs. 60000
(rate being 10% p.a) - Rs. 3000
Total depn - Rs. 24000
=======
Sales, purchases, operating Expenses took place evenly throughout the year.
Inventories are priced according FIFO method. goods in closing inventories
where acquired evenly throughout the year. the dividend of 40000 was declared
and paid at the end of 2001. Income tax accrued throughout the year.
38
your required recent above the statement taking into account the price level
adjustment under cpp method.
The general price indices are as follows: at the end of the year 2000
(beginning of the year 2001) -> 150
Average for the year 2001 -> 157.5
at the end of the year 2001 -> 163.8.
solution:
Calculation of conversion factor
Conversion factor for the appearing at the begging = price index at the date of conversion
Price index at the date the item arose.
1-1-2001 = 163.8
150 = 1.092
Conversion factor for the items appearing throughout the year = 163.8
157.5 = 1.04
Co n.f for the item appearing at the end of the year = 163.8
163.8 = 1
Restated income statement under CPP Method
Particular Historical Cost C.F CPP
Sales 800000 1.04 832000
(-) Cost of Sales ;-
Opening inventory 150000 1.092 163800
(+)purchase 500000 1.04 520000
650000 688800
(-) Cl. Inventory 130000 1.04 135200
Cost of sale 520000 548600
Gross Profit 280000 283400
(-) Operating
Expenses (Excluding
depn) 96000 1.04 99840
Deprn 24000 21000 x 1.092
= 22932
3000 x 1.04
3120 26052
Income for price
level gain 160000 157508
General price level
gain/loss - 4800
Income before price
level gain/loss 160000 152708
(-) Income Tax 70000 1.04 72800
39
Particulars
You may presume that materials are consumed uniformly throughout the year.
Generally, a month after the date of purchase, the rise in the prices is also
throughout the year.