0% found this document useful (0 votes)
14 views3 pages

Exchange Rates II: Short-Run Asset Approach

Uploaded by

Fawaz Ali
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
14 views3 pages

Exchange Rates II: Short-Run Asset Approach

Uploaded by

Fawaz Ali
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Economics 236/336 Fall 2024 - 2025

American University of Beirut


Department of Economics
Economics 236/336

Week 5 Tutorial
Exchange Rates II: The Asset Approach in the Short Run

NOTE: The tutorial problems are intended to provide applications and examples of economic
concepts and models introduced in the lectures. I will post the solutions to these tutorial questions
a week after. Please use this as a learning mechanism and not just a channel to get the solutions.
Please raise any issues or problems (after you have tried working on the problems) through the
online discussion forum on Moodle.

1. Use the money market and FX diagrams to answer the following questions about the relationship between
the British pound (£) and the U.S. dollar ($). The exchange rate is in U.S. dollars per British pound
E$/£ . We want to consider how a change in the U.S. money supply affects interest rates and exchange
rates. On all graphs, label the initial equilibrium point A.

(a) Illustrate how a temporary increase in the U.S. money supply affects the money and FX markets.
Label your short-run equilibrium point B and your long-run equilibrium point C.
(b) Using your diagram from (a), state how each of the following variables changes in the short run
(increase/decrease/no change): U.S. interest rate, British interest rate, the exchange rate E$/£ , the
e
expected exchange rate E$/£ , and the U.S. price level PU S .
(c) Using your diagram from (a), state how each of the following variables changes in the long run
(increase/decrease/no change relative to their initial values at point A): U.S. interest rate, British
e
interest rate, the exchange rate E$/£ , the expected exchange rate E$/£ , and the U.S. price level PU S .

2. Use the money market and FX diagrams to answer the following questions. This question considers the
relationship between the Indian rupee (Rs) and the U.S. dollar ($). The exchange rate is in rupees per
dollar, ERs/$ . On all graphs, label the initial equilibrium point A.

(a) Illustrate how a permanent decrease in Indias money supply affects the money and FX markets.
Label your short-run equilibrium point B and your long-run equilibrium point C.
(b) By plotting them on a chart with time on the horizontal axis, illustrate how each of the following
variables changes over time (for India): nominal money supply MIN , price level PIN , real money
supply MIN /PIN , interest rate iRs , and the exchange rate ERs/$ .
(c) Using your previous analysis, state how each of the following variables changes in the short run
(increase/decrease/no change): Indias interest rate iRs , the exchange rate ERs/$ , expected exchange
e
rate ERs/$ , and price level PIN .
(d) Using your previous analysis, state how each of the following variables changes in the long run
(increase/decrease/no change relative to their initial values at point A): Indias interest rate iRs, the
e
exchange rate ERs/$ , the expected exchange rate ERs/$ , and Indias price level PIN
(e) Explain how overshooting applies to this situation.

1
Economics 236/336 Fall 2024 - 2025

3. Use the money market and FX diagrams to answer the following questions. This question considers the
relationship between the euro (e) and the U.S. dollar ($). The exchange rate is in U.S. dollars per euro,
E$/e . Suppose that with financial innovation in the United States, real money demand in the United
States decreases. On all graphs, label the initial equilibrium point A.

(a) Assume this change in U.S. real money demand is temporary. Using the FX/money market diagrams,
illustrate how this change affects the money and FX markets. Label your short-run equilibrium point
B and your long-run equilibrium point C.
(b) Assume this change in U.S. real money demand is permanent. Using a new diagram, illustrate how
this change affects the money and FX markets. Label your short-run equilibrium point B and your
long-run equilibrium point C.
(c) Illustrate how each of the following variables changes over time in response to a permanent reduction
in real money demand: nominal money supply MU S , price level PU S , real money supply MU S /PU S ,
U.S. interest rate i$ , and the exchange rate E$/e .

4. This question considers how the FX market will respond to changes in monetary policy in South Korea.
For these questions, define the exchange rate as South Korean won per Japanese yen, Ewon/Y . Use the FX
and money market diagrams to answer the following questions. On all graphs, label the initial equilibrium
point A.

(a) Suppose the Bank of Korea permanently increases its money supply. Illustrate the short-run (label
equilibrium point B) and long-run effects (label equilibrium point C) of this policy.
(b) Now, suppose the Bank of Korea announces it plans to permanently increase its money supply but
doesnt actually implement this policy. How will this affect the FX market in the short run if investors
believe the Bank of Koreas announcement?
(c) Finally, suppose the Bank of Korea permanently increases its money supply, but this change is not
anticipated. When the Bank of Korea implements this policy, how will this affect the FX market in
the short run?
(d) Using your previous answers, evaluate the following statements:
• If a country wants to decrease the value of its currency, it can do so (temporarily) without
lowering domestic interest rates.
• The central bank can increase both the domestic price level and value of its currency in the long
run.
• The most effective way to decrease the value of a currency is through surprising investors.

5. In the late 1990s, several East Asian countries used limited flexibility or currency pegs in managing their
exchange rates relative to the U.S. dollar. This question considers how different countries responded to
the East Asian currency crisis (19971998). For the following questions, treat the East Asian country as
the home country and the United States as the foreign country. Also, for the diagrams, you may assume
these countries maintained a currency peg (fixed rate) relative to the U.S. dollar. Also, for the following
questions, you need consider only the short-run effects.

(a) In July 1997, investors expected that the Thai baht would depreciate. That is, they expected that
Thailands central bank would be unable to maintain the currency peg with the U.S. dollar. Illustrate
how this change in investors expectations affects the Thai money market and FX market, with the
exchange rate defined as baht (B) per U.S. dollar, denoted EB/$ . Assume the Thai central bank wants
to maintain capital mobility and preserve the level of its interest rate, and abandons the currency
peg in favor of a floating exchange rate regime.

2
Economics 236/336 Fall 2024 - 2025

(b) Indonesia faced the same constraints as Thailandinvestors feared Indonesia would be forced to aban-
don its currency peg. Illustrate how this change in investors expectations affects the Indonesian
money market and FX market, with the exchange rate defined as rupiahs (Rp) per U.S. dollar, de-
noted ERp/$ . Assume that the Indonesian central bank wants to maintain capital mobility and the
currency peg.
(c) Malaysia had a similar experience, except that it used capital controls to maintain its currency peg
and preserve the level of its interest rate. Illustrate how this change in investors expectations affects
the Malaysian money market and FX market, with the exchange rate defined as ringgit (RM) per
U.S. dollar, denoted ERM/$ . You need show only the short-run effects of this change in investors
expectations.
(d) Compare and contrast the three approaches just outlined. As a policymaker, which would you favor?
Explain.

6. Several countries have opted to join currency unions. Examples include those in the euro area, the CFA
franc union in West Africa, and the Caribbean currency union. This involves sacrificing the domestic
currency in favor of using a single currency unit in multiple countries. Assuming that once a country
joins a currency union, it will not leave, do these countries face the policy trilemma discussed in the text?
Explain.

Common questions

Powered by AI

Countries in a currency union like the Eurozone, CFA franc union, or Caribbean currency union face the policy trilemma, where they cannot simultaneously maintain a fixed exchange rate, free capital movement, and independent monetary policy. By adopting a single currency, these countries sacrifice independent monetary policy, as the central bank's policies are not tailored to the individual needs of each member country. This allows for free capital movement and stable exchange rates internally but limits the countries' ability to respond individually to local economic shocks through monetary policy adjustments .

During the 1997-1998 East Asian currency crisis, Thailand shifted to a floating exchange rate regime, allowing the baht to depreciate in response to speculative attacks. Indonesia attempted to maintain its currency peg while preserving capital mobility, which proved ineffective and led to a crisis. Malaysia implemented capital controls to maintain the ringgit's peg, successfully defending its currency and interest rate levels in the short run . The Malaysian approach was more effective in maintaining short-term stability, as capital controls insulated the economy from speculative pressure, although it restricted capital mobility . This strategy, however, may not be sustainable or desirable in the long run due to potential adverse impacts on investor confidence and economic growth.

When the Bank of Korea announces a permanent increase in the money supply but does not implement the change immediately, investors anticipating future inflation might sell the won, leading to a depreciation without any immediate change in interest rates . If the policy is implemented unexpectedly, the immediate effect is more severe due to investor surprise, causing a sharp depreciation as they adjust portfolios suddenly . Hence, expectation management plays a crucial role in the magnitude of the currency's response, where surprise changes can lead to more volatile and unpredictable market reactions.

A temporary decrease in U.S. real money demand lowers the U.S. interest rate, temporarily depreciating the dollar relative to the euro and increasing the exchange rate E$/e. As this is a temporary change, the long-run effects may reverse as money demand resumes normal levels, adjusting the interest rates and exchange rate back towards the initial equilibrium . If the decrease in real money demand is permanent, the initial depreciation of the dollar is reinforced by a long-term increase in the money supply relative to demand. This permanent change leads to an increased price level and a higher nominal exchange rate E$/e in the long run as the economy adjusts to higher money supply expectations permanently affecting prices .

In the short run, a permanent increase in the Bank of Korea's money supply lowers domestic interest rates, leading to capital outflows and a depreciation of the won against the yen, increasing the exchange rate Ewon/Y . In the long run, the increased money supply elevates the domestic price level, potentially stabilizing the currency at a new, depreciated level as price adjustments catch up with the monetary base expansion. However, the exact long-run effects can vary based on inflation expectations and relative economic performance compared to Japan .

Surprising investors can be an effective short-run strategy due to the sudden and unanticipated adjustments in investor expectations and behaviors, leading to immediate and potentially significant shifts in currency value. Without prior anticipation, investors must rapidly alter their positions in response to new information, causing volatility and rapid exchange rate adjustments as markets absorb the changes. It leverages the element of uncertainty to produce outcomes that might not be achieved through anticipated policy changes, as these gradual changes allow investors to hedge and adjust beforehand, minimizing impact . However, reliance on surprise actions can undermine long-term credibility if overused, as it may erode trust in the central bank's policy consistency and transparency .

Abandoning the currency peg led to immediate depreciation of the Thai baht, which allowed the currency to find a new equilibrium in response to market forces. Initially, this resulted in increased inflationary pressure due to higher import costs and localized economic disruption as the foreign debt burden increased for Thai firms. However, the floating regime also restored monetary policy independence, enabling Thailand to adjust interest rates to address domestic economic conditions rather than defend an overvalued exchange rate . Over time, this strategy facilitated economic recovery by making exports more competitive due to the weaker baht, although initial conditions were challenging .

A permanent decrease in India's money supply initially increases India's interest rate iRs as the liquidity effect dominates. This causes the rupee to appreciate, decreasing the exchange rate ERs/$ in the short run. The price level PIN initially does not change but decreases as the equilibrium adjusts over time. The expected exchange rate Ee Rs/$ decreases initially but stabilizes as expectations adjust to the new long-term equilibrium . In the long run, the reduced nominal money supply relative to demand leads to a lower price level PIN and a subsequent decrease in the real money supply, stabilizing the variables at new equilibrium values but with the rupee remaining appreciated relative to its initial value due to decreased inflation expectations .

Overshooting occurs when the exchange rate's immediate reaction to a monetary policy change is more extreme than its long-term adjustment. For instance, if the money supply in a country is decreased, the immediate effect is an increase in the interest rate, leading to an appreciation of the currency that exceeds its long-run appreciation. This over-adjustment happens because prices are sticky in the short run, and the full impact of the money supply change on inflation and real economic variables takes time to materialize, leading to gradual long-term adjustment of exchange rates .

In the short run, a temporary increase in the U.S. money supply lowers the U.S. interest rate, causing capital to flow out, depreciating the U.S. dollar against the British pound, which raises the exchange rate E$/£. The expected exchange rate Ee $/£ increases momentarily due to the anticipated effects. Meanwhile, the U.S. price level remains unchanged initially . In the long run, as the price level PUS adjusts upward, the real money supply returns to its original level, restoring the U.S. interest rate and reverting the exchange rate E$/£ to its initial value. The expected exchange rate Ee $/£ also returns to its original anticipation once price adjustments occur fully .

You might also like