Spring Oscillator Motion Analysis Report
Spring Oscillator Motion Analysis Report
LABORATORY
SUMMARY
The vertical spring oscillator was considered due to the friction conditions presented by the oscillator of a spring.
horizontally preventing the occurrence of uniform harmonic motion; the system consists of a spring from which a mass is hung at its lower end and in
the upper part suspends the spring from a fixed point, the hanging mass must be such that it does not damage the spring, due to the fact that it does not
it complies with the M.A.S; taking the above into account, the laboratory is conducted with two springs of different constants k, it will be verified
experimentally the relationship that exists between the oscillation period and the effective mass of the spring, it will also be confirmed that the
The period is directly proportional to the square root of the mass and inversely proportional to the square root of the constant.
dock.
3
Mass-Spring System
( ) ( ) ( ) T vs m
0,01 0.435 0.189 1
y = 2.9819x0.428
0.02 0.541 0.293 0.9
0.5
0.06 0.910 0.828
0.4
0.07 0,988 0.976
0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07
Table 2: Period of oscillation of the spring (with constant of
Graph 2: relationship between the period and the mass for the
elasticity K= 3 N/m) subjected to different masses.
spring with a constant of 3 N/m.
k
It is important to say that the relationship= √ it is fulfilled, at
T^2 vs m m
Graph 3: relationship between the square of the period and the mass for REFERENCES
the spring constant of 20 N/m.
Physics for Sciences
Engineering, Volume I, 4th edition, McGraw-Hill Publishing
T^2 vs m Interamericana S.A, Mexico City, p. (180-182).
1,1
y = 5.5562x + 0.6219 A. P. French, 2000, Variations and waves, physics course
1 M.I.T., Editorial Reverté S. A. Spain, page (47-49)
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.01 0.03 0.05 0.07 0.09
Graph 4: relationship between the squared period and the mass for l
spring with a constant of 3 N/m
2∝ ∝√
Conclusions
5
Mass-Spring System