CALCULATION MEMORIES FOR NEW PIPE RACK

DECALCULATION MEMORY

FOR
ASSEMBLY OF CAUSTIC SODA TREATMENT PLANT USED FOR THE ESMERALDAS REFINERY

DISCIPLINE : CIVIL

DOC. No : OSS-EPP1-ING-CV-020-004

OWNER: EPPETROECUADOR

PARACONSTRUCTION

0 PARACONSTRUCTION
E FOR CLIENT REVIEW
D FOR CLIENT REVIEW
C FOR CLIENT REVIEW
B FOR INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEW
A FOR INTERNAL REVIEW
RevNo. DESCRIPTION
This document is the property of OIL SERVICES & SOLUTIONS S.A. OILSERV and contains information
confidential. Its dissemination, copying, or use without written authorization from OIL is expressly prohibited.
SERVICES & SOLUTIONS [Link]

Page 11 of 34
 CONTENT

1. DESIGN CRITERIA
1.1 INTRODUCTION
1.2 CODES AND STANDARDS
1.3MATERIALS
1.4 SOIL CHARACTERISTICS
1.5 CHARACTERISTICS OF THE PLACE
1.6 UNIT PRICE OF THE MATERIALS
1.7 FRICTION COEFFICIENT
1.8 LIMITS OF ADMISSIBLE DEFLECTIONS
2. DIMENSIONS
2.1 DIMENSIONS OF THE STRUCTURE

3. ANALYSIS OF THE COMPUTATIONAL MODEL

3.1 GEOMETRY OF THE STRUCTURE
3.2 STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS

4. LOADS AND LOAD COMBINATIONS

4.1 PERMANENT LOADS(D)
4.1.1 WEIGHT OF THE STRUCTURE
4.1.2 WEIGHT OF PIPES, GRATING AND HANDRAILS
4.2 USAGE OVERLOADS(L)
4.3 LOAD DUE TO EARTHQUAKE () E
4.3.1 HORIZONTAL SEISMIC FORCE (Ex, Ey)
4.4 WIND LOAD ( W )
4.5 DISCHARGE COMBINATIONS
4.5.1 SERVICE LOAD COMBINATIONS
4.5.2 LOAD COMBINATIONS LAST

5. ANALYSIS OF RESULTS
5.1 DISPLACEMENTS
5.2 DEFLECTIONS
5.3 EFFICIENCY OF THE ELEMENTS
5.4 MOTHERBOARDS
5.5 ANCHOR BOLTS

6. FOUNDATIONS
6.1 HIGH STRUCTURE FOUNDATION
6.2 STRUCTURAL FOUNDATION

7. ANNEXES
7.1 REPORT OF REACTIONS FOR THE DESIGN OF FOUNDATIONS
1. DESIGN CRITERIA

1.1 INTRODUCTION

The pipe rack is a portal structure made of structural steel, consisting of two portals.
longitudinal of five spans with a column axis spacing of 2.50m and 6.00m
of light and by six transverse porticoes of 1 span whose spacing between column axes is
3.20m of light; these portals were structured using elements
ductile structural elements, formed by columns and metal beams.

The foundation of the pipe rack is made up of isolated footings, pedestals, and chains.
reinforced concrete; the footings for axes A and B are founded at a depth of 1.5m
measured from the finish grading level. For axes C, D, E, and F, the footings are
cemented at 1.0m depth measured from the finish grading level; these
Foundations rely on an improvement of 0.45m thickness made up of Slurry.

1.2 CODES AND STANDARDS

1.2.1 ACI318-05
1.2.2 ASCE7-05
1.2.3 UBC97
1.2.4 NEC2014
1.2.5 AISC

1.3MATERIALS

1.3.1 Structural Steel:

- fy = 2400kg/cm² Hot-rolled profiles, according to ASTMA36

1.3.2 Concrete:
- f’c = 240kg/cm² (For the foundations)
- f’c = 140kg/cm² (For replanting)

1.3.3 Reinforcement steel:

- fy = 4200kg/cm² (All bars): ASTM A615 Grade 60

1.4 SOIL CHARACTERISTICS

Admissible effort Qadm = 100.0 kPa 10.00t/m² (For static loads)
Admissible effort Qadm = 133.0 kPa 13.30 tons/m² (For combined loads, I consist)
Ballast Coefficient Ks = 12,000 kN/m³ 1200t/m³ KS= 120 *Qadm
For reference of the characteristics and allowable soil capacity see the documents:
408005-00445-90.0-EG-REP-WPI-EPP-0513 GEOTECHNICAL FOUNDATION REPORT
408005-00445-90.1-EG-LTR-WPI-OSS-8932 REMISSION SOIL STUDY
Sosagastada Plant
1.5 CHARACTERISTICS OF THE PLACE
1.5.1 Coeficiente sismico(Z): 0.50 (Seismic Zone VI)

1.6 UNIT PRICE OF THE MATERIALS

1.6.1 Reinforced Concrete

- 24.0 kN/m³ 2.4t/m³

1.6.2 Steel
- 78.5 kN/m³ 7.85t/m³

1.7 FRICTION COEFFICIENT

1.7.1 Concrete and Soil: 0.50
1.7.2 Steel and Steel: 0.30

1.8 LIMITS OF ADMISSIBLE DEFLECTIONS

1.8.1 Deflection (Vertical)

Beams: L /300
Volados : L /150

1.8.2 Displacement (Horizontal)

Open structure : H/200

Where: L = Length of the laviga

H = Height of the structure
[Link]

2.1 STRUCTURE DIMENSIONS

The dimensions in plan and elevation of the structure are presented.

Figure [Link] - TOS EL+1.55, TOS EL+4.00, TOS EL+6.76, TOS EL+8.65

Figure 2. PORTICO AXIS 1, PORTICO AXIS 3

 Figure 3. PORTICOS AXES: A, B, C, D, E andF

3. ANALYSIS OF THE COMPUTATIONAL MODEL

The structural model includes all the main structural elements that make up the
structure.

3.1 GEOMETRY OF THE STRUCTURE

The geometry of the model is composed of nodes and elements that are applicable for the
SAP2000 program. All elements have assigned geometric properties. y
properties of the material according to its real characteristics.

Figure [Link]-Dimensional View

 3.2 STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS
The elements belonging to the structure were modeled using frame elements.
data in the SAP 2000 program. The material used is: ASTMA36 Steel.

4. LOADS AND LOAD COMBINATIONS

4.1 PERMANENT LOADS (D)

4.1.1 WEIGHT OF THE STRUCTURE
56.24 kN 5624kg (Determined in the model)
Structure weight :

4.1.2 WEIGHT OF PIPES, GRATING AND HANDRAILS

Grating type ARS -3: 25.5kg/m² (Support strip 25x3mm)
0.26 kN/m²
Handrail: 0.18 kN/m 18.0 kg/m
Pipes and trays:
This information was provided by the Pipe, Electrical, Instrumentation, and Control areas.
The load related to pipes was defined considering the pipes filled with water.
hydrostatic test) and with product (Sosacáustica).

For the reserve areas on the two levels of the rack, piping of the same was considered.
specification to the designed and equally filled with water. To define the weight that it will support
The loads indicated below have been taken from the pipe rack.

Weight considered for first level:

Trays and cables: 600.0 Kg/m (Two-level Tower and Rack)
Trays and cables: 295.5 Kg/m (One (1) level rack)
Pipelines with product: 168.3 Kg/m (Tower and Rack of two (2) levels)
Pipes with product: 86.0 Kg/m (One (1) level rack)

To determine the forces in each of the loading beams, the values are multiplied.
previously indicated by the cooperating width of each beam which is 3.0 m, which gives
result the following:

Trays and cables: 1800.0 kg (Two (2) level Tower and Rack)
Trays and cables: 886.5 kg (One (1) level rack)
Pipes with product: 505.0 kg (Two-level Tower and Rack)
Pipes with product: 258.0 kg (One (1) level rack)
Weight considered for second level:
Pipes with product: 336.7 Kg/m (Two (2) levels Tower and Rack)
To determine the forces in each of the load-bearing beams, the values are multiplied.
previously indicated by the cooperating width of each beam which is 3.0 m, which gives
result the following:

Pipes with product: 1010.0 kg (Two-level Tower and Rack)

 Figure 5. Loads of pipes, trays, grating, and handrails. [D(t,m)]

4.2 USAGE OVERLOADS (L)

It is the load due to the operation and use of the construction, and in general, everything that is not
It has a fixed and definitive position in it. The information from the regulation was considered.
Construction Code (NEC 2014), numeral 4.2.1:
Overload of use: 1.40kN = 0.14 t (All the surfaces of covers subject to a
maintenance of workers

Figure 6. Usage Loads [L(t,m)]

4.3 LOAD BY EARTHQUAKE)(E
4.3.1 HORIZONTAL SEISMIC FORCE (Ex, Ey)
Calculation based on the NEC-2014 standard
Z=0.50 Seismic zone factor VI
I=1.00 Importance factor
R = 3.00 Structural response (industrial warehouse)
fe = 0.90 Irregularity factor
fp = 1.00
n = 1.80 Seismic zoning coefficient - coastal region
Fa= 0.85 0.77 Tipo de Suelo: E
Sa=n*Z*Fa = Seismic acceleration

V = Sa * I / (R * fe* fp)We = 0.285 We

V= 0.285*We = Basal Cutter
Calculation based on UBC97
Zone factor Z= 0.4 (Zone 4 in UBC97, table 16-I) )
Factor of importance I= 1.00 ( UBC97, table 16-K )
Structural response R= 3.6 (table 16-P - Storage shelves)
Seismic coefficient (Ca, Cv) Ca= 0.4 In (UBC97, table 16-Q )
Cv= 0.6 Nv ( UBC97, table 16-R )
Factor (Na, Nv) Na= 1.0 (UBC97, table 16-S) )
Nv= 1.0 (UBC97, table 16-T )
Vx(max) = {2.5*Ca*I/R)}We = 0.278 We
Vx(min) = {0.11*Ca*I}We = 0.044 We
We = Equipment weight + 25% Live Load

Figure 7. Definition of earthquake loads in X and earthquake in Y [Ex, Ey]

4.4 WIND LOAD ( W )

Calculation based on the NEC-2014 standard

V = 28.0 m/s 101 km/h ) Maximum instantaneous wind speed
s = 0.90 Correction coefficient (CategoryB)
Vb=25,2m/s Corrected wind speed
r = 1.25 kg/m³ Air density
Ce=1,00 Environment/Height Coefficient
Cf= 0.80 Deformation coefficient
P = 317.52 N/m² = 0.032t/m² Wind pressure (1/2* r *Vb2*Ce*Cf)

Distribution of wind loads

Profile
IPE160 & HEB160
IPE200
L60x4
HEB140

Figure 8. Wind Loads in the X Direction [Wx(t,m)]

Figure 9. Wind Loads in the Y direction [Wy(t,m)]

 4.5 DISCHARGE COMBINATIONS

4.5.1 SERVICE LOAD COMBINATIONS

Ra1= D
Ra2= D+ L
Ra4= D + 0.75 L
Ra5= D±(W o 0.7E)
Ra6= D + 0.75 L±0.75(W o0.7E)
Ra8= 0.6 D ±(W or 0.7E)

4.5.2 LOAD COMBINATIONS LAST

Ru1= 1,4 D Where, D : Permanent load
Ru2= 1.2 D+1.6 L L: Overuse
Ru4= 1,2 D+L + 1.0 W E: Earthquake Load
Ru5= 1,2 D + L ±1.0 E Wind load
Ru6= 0.9 D±1.0 W
Ru7= 0.9 D±1.0 E

5. ANALYSIS OF RESULTS

5.1 MOVEMENTS

According to what is indicated in numeral 1.8, the maximum permissible displacements must be:

Columns: H/200
Where:
H = Height of the column SISMOEx

EARTHQUAKE

SISMOEx

SISMOEy
Figure 10. Deformations due to EARTHQUAKE (Ex),(Ey)
 Check of displacements
Structure Knot
It high structure
107
It low structure
36

5.2 DEFLECTIONS

According to the indication in numeral 1.8, the maximum permissible deflections (in limit state
service) must be:

Beams: L/300
L/150 (Overhangs)
Where:
L = Vano of the laviga

SismoEy

Combination Ra2

Figure 11. Deflections - Beams EL+1.55

SismoEy

Combination Ra2

Figure 12. Deflections - Beams EL + 4.00

 Earthquake Ey SismoEy

Combination Ra2 CominaciónRa2

Figure 13. Deflections - Beams EL+6.76, EL+8.66

Deflection check
Structure Knot
Piperack
113
EL+1.55
Piperack
115
EL+4.00
Piperack
18
EL+6.76
Piperack
EL+8.65
Piperack
55
EL+1.55
Piperack
53
EL+4.00
Piperack
87
EL+6.76
Piperac k
28
EL+8.65
5.3 EFFICIENCY OF THE ELEMENTS

Figure [Link] - BeamsEL+1.55

Figure 15. Efficiencies - Beams EL+4.00

Figure 16. Efficiencies - Beams EL+6.76, EL+8.65

Figure 17. Efficiencies - Beams and Columns Portico Axis1

Figure 18. Efficiencies - Beams and Columns Portico axis 3

Figure 19. Efficiencies - Beams and Columns Portico axes A and

B
 Figure 20. Efficiencies - Beams and Columns Portal axes C, D, E and
F

5.4 MOTHERBOARDS

5.4.1 LOW STRUCTURE

DESIGN OF BASE PLATES WITH ASD
DATA: COMBINATION Ra5y1
ReactionP=
MomentM= TYPE PLATE SUMMARY
Horizontal [Link]=
[Link]=
High [Link]=
Espesorecolx=
Espesorecolz=
Concrete f'c =
AceroFypl =
[Link]=
High [Link]=
[Link]=
Effort

Plate a traction
PLATE DESIGN
Excentricidade=
Axial force=
[Link]=
effortp x=
Effortn x=
effortmaxx=
Cargaqx=
VoladoLx=
MomentM1x=
MomentM2x=
Espesortpl x=
[Link]=
effortpz=
Effortnz=
Effortmaxz=
SECTION OF PLATE : [Link]= 300 mm
Cargaqz=
[Link]= 300 mm
VoladoLz=
[Link]=20mm
MomentoM1z=
MomentM2z=
Espesortpl z= ANCHORED BOLTS :
Assumed thicknesspl = 4 screws of 20mm
DOES NOT REQUIRE RIBS PESO=14.13 kgs (screw bolts)
 5.4.2 STRUCTURAL HEIGHT
BASE PLATE DESIGN WITH ASDF
DATA:
ReacciónP=
MomentoM=
Horizontal cut FH=
Width [Link]=
High [Link]=
Hormigónf'c= COMBINATION Ra5y3
AceroFypl =
Ancho [Link]=
High [Link]=
effort [Link]=
Effort
traction plate
PLATE DESIGN
Excentricidade= SUMMARYPLACATYPE
Axial effort
[Link]=
effortp x=
Effortn x=
effortmaxx=
Cargaqx=
VoladoLx=
MomentM1x=
MomentM2x=
Espesortpl x=
[Link]=
Effortp z=
Effortn z=
Effortmaxz=
Cargaqz=
VoladoLz=
MomentM1z=
MomentM2z=
Espesortpl z=
Assumed thicknesspl =
the plate requires ribs
RIB DESIGN
Module [Link] x=
Alturahcx=
Thicknesscx=
Thickenercx=
AreaAcx=
DistanceYcx=
AreaApl x=
[Link] x= SECTION OF PLACA:[Link]= 350 mm
instance [Link]= [Link] = 350 mm
InerciaIx= [Link]=25mm
Cal.S [Link]=
S reqz= SECCIONDECOSTILLAS Costx:
Alturahcz= Cant. = 4u
Thicknesscz= hc=150mmec=10mm
The thickenercz=
AreaAcz=
SECCIONDECOSTILLAS Costz:
DistanceYcz=
Cant.= 4 u
AreaApl z=
hc= 150mm
DistanceYpl z=
ec = 10 mm
Distance e.n.e Yz=
Inertially= BOLTS A NCLAJE:
Cal.S Modulecalz= 8 screws of 25mm
PESO= 31.11 kgs without bolts
 5.5 ANCHOR BOLTS

5.5.1 LOW STRUCTURE

For the design of this foundation, the most critical combination is considered, which is:
TABLE: Joint Reactions
Joint OutputCase
Text Text
82 Ru5x3
It is considered that the structure will be anchored to the foundation with 4 anchor bolts, for the
both the moment (M2) causes 2 bolts to be under tension and the other 2 bolts a
compression; and furthermore, that the shear force (F1) is distributed proportionally to the bolts;
Based on this analysis, the following forces are established to check the anchoring bolts.
Pu = M2/s1 = 0.91247 / 0.21 = 4.35 t = 4345.1kg
Vu = F1/2 = 1.1753 / 2 = 0.59 t = 587.7kg
THIS DESIGN DEPARTS FROM PRE-INSTALLED ANCHOR S COMBINATION: Ru5x3
COEFFICIENT PARSIMONY 1.00 B
TRACTION c2 s2 c2'
RESISTANCE OF ACER TO LATRACCTION f= 0.75 bolts
# col do(mm)
15565 2
kg /cm240 2531.1

h ef A
cm cm
35.0 45.0
h'ef ANco
cm cm2
N1.00For anchors located in concrete
Yc22.0 t seizure 2 2 .0 0 CALCULATE 4356 hef
Yc N1.25For anchors located in concrete t or sinfisuration ha
RES IS T. THE EXTRACTION BY SLIDING IT IS LATERAL DETACHMENT

P ERNO
CON
HEAD 12.0 OK: >P u
Y cN1.0For anchors located in concrete t or with fisuracion
Y cN1.4 For anchors located in concrete t oh sin fisurgery
COURT

STEEL
RESISTANCE TO PULLING OUT OF THE C O NC f= 0.70 THE REST IS T. THE DETACH.
CHALLENGE
All fAll
kg kg
6226.12 8094 60 0 12.0 648.02829.2 810.0 1.00 0.90 1.00
OK: >Vu YcN=1.0For anchors located in concrete t or confiscation 4 0 .0 0 1.00
For anchors located in concrete t the confiscation with reinforcements lmen t ariocons ist in bars of diname
t ro no. 13 o
f= 0.65 Yc N=1.2
mayor
For anchors located in concrete t the confiscation with reinforcement up lamen t ariocons ist and in bars of ofname
t ro no. 13 o
Yc N =1.4
mayor y confined with ribbed spacers no more than 100mm
TRACTION-CUT INTERACTION
HEAD
P ERNIE HEAD
Nu/fNn
fNn fVn
You/fVnkg kg

7338.6 2228.0 0.5921 0.2638

OK

As a conclusion of the verification of the anchor bolts from the previous spreadsheet, it
it must meet all verifications, with the traction-cut interaction equal to 0.85
which is less than 1.0. Furthermore, the pedestal's rebar is considered as reinforcement for
counteract the pulling off of concrete.
 5.5.2 HIGH STRUCTURE

For the design of this foundation, the most critical combination is considered, which is:

TABLE: Joint Reactions

Joint OutputCase
Text Text
104 Ru5y3

It is considered that the structure will be anchored to the foundation with 8 anchor bolts, because
both the moment (M1) causes 3 bolts to be under tension and the other 3 bolts a
compression; and also that the shear force (F2) is distributed proportionally to the bolts;
Based on this analysis, the following forces are established to verify the anchoring bolts.
Pu = M1/s1 = 3.12533 / 0.25 = 12.50 t = 12501.3 kg
Vu = F2/2 = 2.8964 / 2 = 1.45 t = 1448,2kg
THIS DESIGN OF ANCHOR BOLTS TO PRE-INSTALLED SLAB COMBINATION: Ru5y3
C O EFIC IENTE PO RS ISMO 1.00 B
TRACTION c2 s2 c2'
RESISTANCE OF THE ACERO TO THE TRACC IO N f= 0.75 bolts
# col do(mm)
42286 2
kg/cm
240 2531.1

h ef A
cm cm
50.0 50.0
h'ef ANco
cm cm2
YcN =1.00 P anchors located in concrete or with cracking
25.0 2 5.0 0 CALCULATE 5625 hef
YcN1.25 P anchorages located in concrete or without cracking ha
RESIST. TO THE EXTRACTC I DON'T SLIP RESIST. TO LATERAL DETACHMENT
P ERNO
CON
HEAD
100.0 1.00 192000 192000 403200 OK: >P u 12.5 OK: >P u

YcN=1.0 P anchors located in concrete or confiscation

YcN1.4 P anchorages located in concrete or without pouring CUT

I DO RESISTANCE TO PULLING OUT OF THE C The NC

CHALLENGE f= 0.70 RESIST. TO DETACH.

Everything fAll
kg kg
11276.2 21989 60 0 12.5 703.1 3473.2 937.5 1.00 0.90 1.00
OK: >Vu YcN1.0 P anchors located in concrete or with cracking 4 0 .0 0 1.00
Y cN1.2 P Anchorages located in concrete or with cracking with supplementary reinforcement consisting of bars with a diameter of no. 13. o
f= 0.65
mayor
P Anchors located in concrete or with cracking with additional reinforcement consisting of bars of diameter no. 13 o
Y cN1.4 larger and confined with these spaced ribs no more than 100mm apart
TRACTION-CUT INTERACTION
HEAD P HEADFISH
fNn fVn Nu/fNn
YoufVnkg kg
33606.2 2917.5 0.3720.4964
OK

As a conclusion of the verification of the anchor bolts from the previous spreadsheet, we
it has to meet all the verifications, with the traction-cut interaction being equal to 0.87
which is less than 1.0. Furthermore, the pedestal reinforcement is considered as reinforcement for
counteract the pulling off of concrete.
6. FOUNDATIONS

The information for the design of the foundations is obtained from the reactions reported.
the structural analysis of the PIPERACK carried out with SAP2000. (See Annex )

6.1 HIGH STRUCTURE FOUNDATION

For the design of this foundation, the most critical combination is considered, which is:

TABLE: Joint Reactions

Joint OutputCase
Text Text
74 Ra5x2
102 Ra8y1
104 Ra5y3
6.1.1 DIMENSIONS
Y(2) Z
0.20 m
My

Mx
X(1) X

0.30 m
L = 1.50 m
0.50 m
L= 1,50 m

6.1.2 EFFORTS ON THE FLOOR

specific weight
Horm. Soil
gh
to/from3 to/from3
2.40 1.80
2.40 1.80
2.40 1.80

Page2020of
 Effort on the ground
Around the X axis or axis(1)
P/A+s x
to/with2
3.19
3.88
10.63
As can be seen in the reactions table for the combination Ra8y1, there is a load.
traction, which originate an eccentricity greater than B/6, so it is verified that 82% of the
This base is working on compression, which is greater than 80% as recommended by the standards.
design publications sedimentations

2
The maximum soil effort of 10.63 t/m is produced in the combination Ra5y3, which
2
less than the allowable soil effort of 13.3t/m .

CALCULATION OF REINFORCING STEEL

A= 0,70 m

(Qmin)= 5.71t/m² (Qmax) = 10.63t/m²

Q1= 8.82t/m²

2
M = (Q1 x A ) / 2 + [(Qmax - Q1) x A] / 2 x (2 / 3)A= 2.46 t-m
V = Q1 x A + [(Qmax-Q1) x A]/2 = 6,81 t

Mu = 1.5 x M = 3.68t-m
Vu = 1.5 x V = 10.21 t

FLEXION
Materials : f´c = 240kg/cm² fy = 4200 kg/cm²
Section: b = 100cm h = 30cm Cover= 5cm d = 25cm
Moment: Mu = 368000 kg-cm
Steel: f = 0 .9 ACI9.3.2.1
r =[0.85(f'c)/f y ]1-√[1-(2Mu)/(f (0.85)(b)(d2) 0.00158
3.96 cm²/m
(f'c))]}=Ascal = r bd = 0.001583 x 100 x 25 =

4/3Ascal = 4/3 x 3.96 =

5.28 cm²/m
r
As min =minbd = 0.0033x100x25= 8.33 cm²/m
As temp = 0.0018 bh = 0.0018x100x30= 5.40 cm²/m Mandatory

USE : (1 Ø14 @200)= 7.70 cm²/m > 5.40 cm²/m OK

 CUT

10.210 t
Vu(max) =

fVc= 0.75x0.53x√f'cxbxd= 0.75 x 0.53 x √240x100x25 15.40 t > 10.210 t O.K

=

6.1.3 DESIGN OF THE MOORING CHAIN

For the design of the tie rods, the axial forces F1 and F2 are considered.
were considered to determine the calculated soil effort in the previous literal.
Fu = 1.5 x 2.0907 = 3.14 t 3136.1 kg

Anec = Fu / (0.9xFy) = 0.83cm²

Use chain 0.25 x 0.25, assembled with: 4 f 12mm = 4.52 cm² > 0.83 cm² OK

6.2 STRUCTURAL FOUNDATION

For the design of this foundation, the most critical combination is considered, which is:

TABLE: Joint Reactions

Joint OutputCase
Text Text
76 Ra6y2
77 Ra5y1
82 Ra5x3

6.2.1 DIMENSIONS
Y(2) Z
0.20 m
My

Mx
X(1) X

0.30 m
L= 1,50 m
0.45 m
L= 1,50 m
6.2.2 EFFORTS IN THE GROUND

Specific weight
Horm. Soil
gh
to/from3 to/and3
2.40 1.80
2.40 1.80
2.40 1.80
Effort on the ground
Around the X axis or axis(1)
P/A+s x
to/from2
8.54
8.71
4.51

As can be seen in the reactions table for the combinations Ra5y1 and Ra5x3.
traction load, which causes an eccentricity greater than B/6, so it is verified that 80%
From the base, it is working on compression, which is greater than or equal to 80%. What do you recommend?
standards and/or publications of foundation design

2
The maximum soil effort of 8.54 t/m occurs in the combination Ra6y2, which
2
less than the allowable soil effort of 13.3t/m .

CALCULATION OF REINFORCING STEEL

A = m
0.33

(Qmin)= 1,26 t/m² (Qmax) = 8.54t/m²

Q1= 6,39t/m²

2
M = (Q1 x A )/2 + [(Qmax-Q1) x A]/2 x (2/3)A = 0.41t-m
V = Q1 x A + [(Qmax-Q1) x A]/2 = 2.43 t

Mu = 1.5 x M = 0.62t-m
Vu = 1.5 x V = 3.64 t
 FLEXION
Materials : f´c = 240kg/cm² fy = 4200kg/cm²
Section: b = 100cm h = 30 cm Recub.= 5cm d = 25cm
Moment: Mu = 62000 kg-cm
Steel f= 0.9 ACI9.3.2.1
r =[0.85(fc)/fy]{1-√[1-(2Mu)/(f (0.85)(b)(d2) 0.00026
0.66cm²/m
(f'c))]}=Ascal = r bd = 0.000263 x 100 x 25 =

4/3Ascal = 4/3x0.66= 0.88 cm²/m

r
As min =minbd = 0.0033x100x25= 8.33 cm²/m
As temp = 0.0018bh = 0.0018x100x30= 5.40cm²/m Mandatory

USE : (1 Ø14 @200)= 7.70 cm²/m > 5.40 cm²/m OK

COURT
Vu(max) = 3.640 t

fVc= 0.75 x 0.53 x √f'cxbxd = 0.75 x 0.53 x √240 x 100 x 25

15.40 t > 3.640 t O.K
=

The tie chains for this foundation are not designed, due to the fact that the forces
Axial forces F1 and F2 have already been considered to determine the calculated soil stress.
literal anterior.

7. ANNEXES

7.1 REPORT ON REACTIONS FOR THE DESIGN OF FOUNDATIONS

TABLE: Joint
Reactions
Joint OutputCcase
Te xt Te xt
74 R a 1
74 R a 2
74 R a 4
74 R a 5x1
74 R a 5x2
74 R a 5y1
74 R a 5y2
74 R a 6x1
74 R a 6x2
74 R a 6y1
74 R a 6y2
74 R a 8x1
74 R a 8x2
74 R a 8y1
74 R a 8y2
74 R a 5x3
74 R a 5x4
Ra5y3 0.78 -0.7148 1.8827 1.28969 0.5734 0.00032 74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75

Page 25 of 34
75 R a 8y3
75 R a 8y4
75 R a 5x5
75 R a 5x6
75 R a 5y5
75 R a 5y6
75 R a 6x5
75 R a 6x6
75 R a 6y5
75 R a 6y6
75 R a 8x5
75 R a 8x6
75 R a 8y5
75 R a 8y6
76 R a 1
76 R a 2
76 R a 4
76 R a 5x1
76 R a 5x2
76 R a 5y1
76 R a 5y2
76 R a 6x1
76 R a 6x2
76 R a 6y1
76 R a 6y2
76 R a 8x1
76 R a 8x2
76 R a 8y1
76 R a 8y2
76 R a 5x3
76 R a 5x4
76 R a 5y3
76 R a 5y4
76 R a 6x3
76 R a 6x4
76 R a 6y3
76 R a 6y4
76 R a 8x3
76 R a 8x4
76 R a 8y3
76 R a 8y4
76 R a 5x5
76 R a 5x6
76 R a 5y5
76 R a 5y6
76 R a 6x5
76 R a 6x6
76 R a 6y5

Page 26 of 34
76 R a 6y6
76 R a 8x5
76 R a 8x6
76 R a 8y5
76 R a 8y6
77 R a 1
77 R a 2
77 R a 4
77 R a 5x1
77 R a 5x2
77 R a 5y1
77 R a 5y2
77 R a 6x1
77 R a 6x2
77 R a 6y1
77 R a 6y2
77 R a 8x1
77 R a 8x2
77 R a 8y1
77 R a 8y2
77 R a 5x3
77 R a 5x4
77 R a 5y3
77 R a 5y4
77 R a 6x3
77 R a 6x4
77 R a 6y3
77 R a 6y4
77 R a 8x3
77 R a 8x4
77 R a 8y3
77 R a 8y4
77 R a 5x5
77 R a 5x6
77 R a 5y5
77 R a 5y6
77 R a 6x5
77 R a 6x6
77 R a 6y5
77 R a 6y6
77 R a 8x5
77 R a 8x6
77 R a 8y5
77 R a 8y6
78 R a 1
78 R a 2
78 R a 4

Page 27 of 34
78 R a 5x1
78 R a 5x2
78 R a 5y1
78 R a 5y2
78 R a 6x1
78 R a 6x2
78 R a 6y1
78 R a 6y2
78 R a 8x1
78 R a 8x2
78 R a 8y1
78 R a 8y2
78 R a 5x3
78 R a 5x4
78 R a 5y3
78 R a 5y4
78 R a 6x3
78 R a 6x4
78 R a 6y3
78 R a 6y4
78 R a 8x3
78 R a 8x4
78 R a 8y3
78 R a 8y4
78 R a 5x5
78 R a 5x6
78 R a 5y5
78 R a 5y6
78 R a 6x5
78 R a 6x6
78 R a 6y5
78 R a 6y6
78 R a 8x5
78 R a 8x6
78 R a 8y5
78 R a 8y6
79 R a 1
79 R a 2
79 R a 4
79 R a 5x1
79 R a 5x2
79 R a 5y1
79 R a 5y2
79 R a 6x1
79 R a 6x2
79 R a 6y1
79 R a 6y squared

Page 28 of 34
79 R a 8x1
79 R a 8x2
79 R a 8y1
79 R a 8y2
79 R a 5x3
79 R a 5x4
79 R a 5y3
79 R a 5y4
79 R a 6x3
79 R a 6x4
79 R a 6y3
79 R a 6y4
79 R a 8x3
79 R a 8x4
79 R a 8y3
79 R a 8y4
79 R a 5x5
79 R a 5x6
79 R a 5y5
79 R a 5y6
79 R a 6x5
79 R a 6x6
79 R a 6y5
79 R a 6y6
79 R a 8x5
79 R a 8x6
79 R a 8y5
79 R a 8y6
80 R a 1
80 R a 2
80 R a 4
80 R a 5x1
80 R a 5x2
80 R a 5y1
80 R a 5y2
80 R a 6x1
80 R a 6x2
80 R a 6y1
80 R a 6y2
80 R a 8x1
80 R a 8x2
80 R a 8y1
80 R a 8y2
80 R a 5x3
80 R a 5x4
80 R a 5y3
80 R a 5y4
80 R a 6x3

Page 29 of 34
80 R a 6x4
80 R a 6y3
80 R a 6y4
80 R a 8x3
80 R a 8x4
80 R a 8y3
80 R a 8y4
80 R a 5x5
80 R a 5x6
80 R a 5y5
80 R a 5y6
80 R a 6x5
80 R a 6x6
80 R a 6y5
80 R a 6y6
80 R a 8x5
80 R a 8x6
80 R a 8y5
80 R a 8y6
81 R a 1
81 R a 2
81 R a 4
81 R a 5x1
81 R a 5x2
81 R a 5y1
81 R a 5y2
81 R a 6x1
81 R a 6x2
81 R a 6y1
81 R a 6y2
81 R a 8x1
81 R a 8x2
81 R a 8y1
81 R a 8y2
81 R a 5x3
81 R a 5x4
81 R a 5y3
81 R a 5y4
81 R a 6x3
81 R a 6x4
81 R a 6y3
81 R a 6y4
81 R a 8x3
81 R a 8x4
81 R a 8y3
81 R a 8y4
81 R a 5x5

Page 30 of 34
81 R a 5x6
81 R a 5y5
81 R a 5y6
81 R a 6x5
81 R a 6x6
81 R a 6y5
81 R a 6y6
81 R a 8x5
81 R a 8x6
81 R a 8y5
81 R a 8y6
82 R a 1
82 R a 2
82 R a 4
82 R a 5x1
82 R a 5x2
82 R a 5y1
82 R a 5y2
82 R a 6x1
82 R a 6x2
82 R a 6y1
82 R a 6y2
82 R a 8x1
82 R a 8x2
82 R a 8y1
82 R a 8y2
82 R a 5x3
82 R a 5x4
82 R a 5y3
82 R a 5y4
82 R a 6x3
82 R a 6x4
82 R a 6y3
82 R a 6y4
82 R a 8x3
82 R a 8x4
82 R a 8y3
82 R a 8y4
82 R a 5x5
82 R a 5x6
82 R a 5y5
82 R a 5y6
82 R a 6x5
82 R a 6x6
82 R a 6y5
82 R a 6y6
82 R a 8x5
82 R a 8x6

Page 31 of 34
 82 R a 8y5
82 R a 8y6
83 R a 1
83 R a 2
83 R a 4
83 R a 5x1
83 R a 5x2
83 R a 5y1
83 R a 5y2
83 R a 6x1
83 R a 6x2
83 R a 6y1
83 R a 6y2
83 R a 8x1
83 R a 8x2
83 R a 8y1
83 R a 8y2
83 R a 5x3
83 R a 5x4
83 R a 5y3
83 R a 5y4
83 R a 6x3
83 R a 6x4
83 R a 6y3
83 R a 6y4
83 R a 8x3
83 R a 8x4
83 R a 8y3
83 R a 8y4
83 R a 5x5
83 R a 5x6
83 R a 5y5
83 R a 5y6
83 R a 6x5
83 R a 6x6
83 R a 6y5
83 R a 6y6
83 R a 8x5
83 R a 8x6
83 R a 8y5
83 R a 8y6
102 Ra 1
102 Ra 2
102 Ra 4
102 Ra 5x1
102 Ra 5x2
102 Ra 5y1
102 Ra 5y2

Page 32 of 34
102 Ra 6x1
102 Ra 6x2
102 Ra 6y1
102 Ra 6y²
102 Ra 8x1
102 Ra 8x2
102 Ra 8y1
102 Ra 8y2
102 Ra 5x3
102 Ra 5x4
102 Ra 5y3
102 Ra 5y4
102 Ra 6x3
102 Ra 6x4
102 Ra 6y3
102 Ra 6y4
102 Ra 8x3
102 Ra 8x4
102 Ra 8y3
102 Ra 8y4
102 Ra 5x5
102 Ra 5x6
102 Ra 5y5
102 Ra 5y6
102 Ra 6x5
102 Ra 6x6
102 Ra 6y5
102 Ra 6y6
102 Ra 8x5
102 Ra 8x6
102 Ra 8y5
102 Ra 8y6
104 Ra 1
104 Ra 2
104 Ra 4
104 Ra 5x1
104 Ra 5x2
104 Ra 5y1
104 Ra 5y2
104 Ra 6x1
104 Ra 6x2
104 Ra 6y1
104 Ra 6y2
104 Ra 8x1
104 Ra 8x2
104 Ra 8y1
104 Ra 8y2

Page 33 of 34
104 Ra 5x3
104 Ra 5x4
104 Ra 5y3
104 Ra 5y4
104 Ra 6x3
104 Ra 6x4
104 Ra 6y cubed
104 Ra 6y4
104 Ra 8x3
104 Ra 8x4
104 Ra 8y3
104 Ra 8y4
104 Ra 5x5
104 Ra 5x6
104 Ra 5y5
104 Ra 5y6
104 Ra 6x5
104 Ra 6x6
104 Ra 6y5
104 Ra 6y6
104 Ra 8x5
104 Ra 8x6
104 Ra 8y5
104 Ra 8y6

Page 34 of 34