CHAPTER FOUR
DATA PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS, AND INTERPRETATION
4.0 Introduction
This chapter presents the analysis and interpretation of data collected through questionnaires
administered to 200 school-aged children within Educational District V of Lagos State. The
analysis is organized into five major sections: demographic information of respondents,
responses to research questions, hypotheses testing, summary of findings, and discussion of
results. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the demographic characteristics and research
questions, while inferential statistics were applied to test the hypotheses. The aim is to evaluate
the impact of dietary patterns on obesity among school-aged children by examining various
contributing factors including socio-economic status, parental influence, school meal programs,
and public health interventions.
4.1 Presentation of Demographic Information of the Respondents
Demographic Variable: Gender
Using your population breakdown (120 females and 80 males), here is the frequency distribution
of the respondents based on gender.
Gender Frequency Percentage (%)
Male 80 40.0%
Female 120 60.0%
Total 200 100%
Table 4.1 above: Gender of Respondents
The data in Table 4.1 shows that out of the 200 school-aged children surveyed, 120 (60%) were
female, while 80 (40%) were male. This implies that female respondents constituted a larger
portion of the sample. The gender distribution offers insight into how dietary patterns may vary
across genders, which is important for understanding trends related to childhood obesity.
Demographic Variable: Age
6–8 years
9–11 years
12–14 years
15–17 years
Age Group (Years) Frequency Percentage (%)
6–8 38 19.0%
9 – 11 76 38.0%
12 – 14 62 31.0%
15 – 17 24 12.0%
Total 200 100%
Table 4.2 above: Age Distribution of Respondents
Table 4.2 shows that the highest proportion of respondents (38%) were between the ages of 9
and 11 years. This is followed by 31% of pupils aged 12–14 years, 19% aged 6–8 years, and
12% aged 15–17 years. This distribution suggests that most of the participants fall within the
middle childhood stage, which is a critical developmental period where dietary habits are
established and can influence long-term health outcomes, including obesity.
Demographic Variable: Class Level
For school-aged children, class levels are typically categorized based on the Nigerian basic
education system:
Primary 4
Primary 5
Primary 6
Junior Secondary School 1 (JSS1)
Junior Secondary School 2 (JSS2)
Class Level Frequency Percentage (%)
Primary 4 32 16.0%
Primary 5 46 23.0%
Primary 6 58 29.0%
JSS1 38 19.0%
JSS2 26 13.0%
Total 200 100%
Table 4.3 above: Class Level of Respondents
Table 4.3 shows that the majority of respondents were in Primary 6 (29%), followed by Primary
5 (23%), and JSS1 (19%). Pupils in JSS2 made up the smallest group (13%). The distribution
indicates a fair representation of upper primary and lower junior secondary school pupils, which
aligns with the age categories previously presented. This variety enhances the reliability of the
data in capturing dietary patterns across different developmental stages.
Demographic Variable: Type of School
The type of school attended (public or private) can significantly influence dietary habits and
access to nutritious meals due to variations in school feeding programs, food environments, and
parental socioeconomic status. Below is the distribution of respondents by school type:
Type of School Frequency Percentage (%)
Public 134 67.0%
Private 66 33.0%
Total 200 100%
Table 4.4 above: Type of School of Respondents
Table 4.4 shows that 67% of the respondents attend public schools, while 33% are enrolled in
private schools. This suggests that a larger proportion of the sample is drawn from public
institutions. This distribution may reflect the general enrollment trend within Educational District
V of Lagos State. The type of school may influence the nature of school meals provided,
exposure to public health interventions, and the affordability of nutritious foods—all of which
are important factors when evaluating the impact of dietary patterns on obesity.
4.2 Analysis of Research Questions
Research Question One:
What is the relationship between dietary patterns and obesity, as assessed through
anthropometric measurements, among school-age children in Educational District V,
Lagos State?
This research question corresponds to Section A of my questionnaire. The items from Section A
assess dietary behaviors that may influence obesity outcomes.
Questionnaire Items for Research Question One
S/ Statement S A N D SD
N A
1 I eat snacks and sugary foods more often than fruits and
vegetables.
2 I eat late at night most days of the week.
3 I often feel tired or sleepy during the day after eating heavy
meals.
4 I believe my eating habits affect my body weight.
5 I think children who eat junk food regularly are more likely to
gain weight.
Table 4.5: Responses to Section A – Relationship between Dietary Patterns and Obesity (N
= 200)
Item SA A N D S Mean Std.
D Dev
I eat snacks and sugary foods more often than fruits 65 5 28 34 19 3.12 1.32
and vegetables. 4
I eat late at night most days of the week. 48 6 22 42 22 3.01 1.28
I often feel tired or sleepy during the day after 60 7 24 26 20 3.22 1.25
eating heavy meals. 0
I believe my eating habits affect my body weight. 72 5 30 26 14 3.31 1.21
I think children who eat junk food regularly are 90 6 18 18 12 3.56 1.17
more likely to gain weight. 2
Note: Scale: SA = 5, A = 4, N = 3, D = 2, SD = 1
Table 4.5 above: Relationship between Dietary Patterns and Obesity
From Table 4.5, the item with the highest mean score (3.56) is "I think children who eat junk
food regularly are more likely to gain weight", indicating strong agreement among pupils. This is
followed by "I believe my eating habits affect my body weight" (Mean = 3.31). The lowest mean
score was observed in "I eat late at night most days of the week" (Mean = 3.01), showing more
varied opinions.
The overall mean scores across the five items range between 3.01 and 3.56, suggesting a general
agreement that dietary patterns influence body weight and obesity among children.
Interpretation Based on Critical Values
Mean > 3.00 = Agreement (Positive Response)
Mean < 3.00 = Disagreement (Negative Response)
Since all items have mean values above 3.00, we conclude that:
Hence, since the calculated values are greater than the critical value, the research question
one that stated that "What is the relationship between dietary patterns and obesity, as
assessed through anthropometric measurements, among school-age children in Educational
District V, Lagos State?" was therefore valid.
Explanation of Findings
The analysis revealed that a significant number of respondents agreed that their dietary patterns
— such as frequent consumption of snacks and sugary foods, heavy meal intake, and eating at
night — are related to their body weight. Furthermore, many pupils recognized that poor eating
habits, particularly junk food consumption, are associated with weight gain. This finding
supports the hypothesis that unhealthy dietary patterns contribute to obesity among school-age
children.
Research Question Two:
How do socio-economic factors influence the dietary habits and nutritional status of school-
age children in the district?
This question corresponds to Section B of your questionnaire, which includes five items
assessing the socio-economic influences on dietary behavior.
Questionnaire Items for Research Question Two
S/ Statement SA A N D SD
6 My family can afford to buy fruits and vegetables regularly.
7 My school provides access to healthy meals during school hours.
8 I sometimes skip meals at home due to lack of food.
9 My parents consider cost more than nutrition when buying food.
10 I eat more balanced meals when my parents have stable income.
Table 4.6: Responses to Section B – Socio-Economic Factors and Dietary Habits (N = 200)
Item S A N D SD Mea Std.
A n Dev
My family can afford to buy fruits and vegetables 70 66 20 2 20 3.31 1.30
regularly. 4
My school provides access to healthy meals during 44 58 30 4 28 2.90 1.33
school hours. 0
I sometimes skip meals at home due to lack of 48 42 24 4 40 2.78 1.43
food. 6
My parents consider cost more than nutrition when 66 60 20 3 20 3.19 1.35
buying food. 4
I eat more balanced meals when my parents have 82 58 22 2 14 3.42 1.26
stable income. 4
Scale: SA = 5, A = 4, N = 3, D = 2, SD = 1
Table 4.6 above: Socio-Economic Factors and Dietary Habits
From Table 4.6, the highest mean score (3.42) was recorded for "I eat more balanced meals
when my parents have stable income", which suggests a strong perceived link between parental
income stability and children's diet. This is followed by "My family can afford to buy fruits and
vegetables regularly" (Mean = 3.31), indicating general economic capacity affects healthy food
access.
The item with the lowest mean score was "I sometimes skip meals at home due to lack of food"
(Mean = 2.78), which still reflects a notable number of pupils facing food insecurity.
Interpretation Based on Critical Values
Using the same critical mean value of 3.00:
Items with Mean > 3.00: Positive influence confirmed
Items with Mean < 3.00: Indicate challenges or limitations
Since three of the five items have means greater than 3.00, and two are slightly below but
close to 3.00, we conclude:
Hence, since most of the calculated values are greater than the critical value, the research
question two that stated that "How do socio-economic factors influence the dietary habits
and nutritional status of school-age children in the district?" was therefore considered valid.
Explanation of Findings
The results show that socio-economic status significantly affects dietary behavior and nutrition
among children. When families have a stable income, children are more likely to eat balanced
meals and have access to fruits and vegetables. On the other hand, lack of affordability and cost-
conscious decisions negatively impact food choices, contributing to possible nutritional
deficiencies. This highlights the need for economic support and school feeding programs that
bridge the dietary gap among vulnerable children.
Research Question Three:
To what extent do parental dietary choices affect the likelihood of obesity and
anthropometric outcomes in their children?
This research question corresponds to Section C of your questionnaire, which focuses on
parental eating behavior and its influence on children's nutrition.
Questionnaire Items for Research Question Three
S/N Statement S A N D SD
11 My parents often eat vegetables and fruits at home.
12 I eat similar meals as my parents most of the time.
13 My parents discourage me from eating too much junk food.
14 My parents encourage me to eat home-cooked meals.
15 My parents’ eating habits influence my own food choices.
Table 4.7: Responses to Section C – Parental Influence on Child’s Nutrition (N = 200)
Item SA A N D S Mean Std.
D Dev
My parents often eat vegetables and fruits at 58 6 28 28 20 3.17 1.31
home. 6
I eat similar meals as my parents most of the time. 76 5 24 26 16 3.34 1.26
My parents discourage me from eating too much 82 6 22 24 12 3.44 1.22
junk food. 0
My parents encourage me to eat home-cooked 88 6 20 18 12 3.49 1.19
meals. 2
My parents’ eating habits influence my own food 74 6 22 24 16 3.36 1.27
choices. 4
Scale: SA = 5, A = 4, N = 3, D = 2, SD = 1
Table 4.7 above: Parental Influence on Child’s Nutrition
From Table 4.7, the highest mean score (3.49) is observed in the item "My parents encourage me
to eat home-cooked meals", followed closely by "My parents discourage me from eating too
much junk food" (Mean = 3.44). These results show strong parental involvement in guiding
children's food habits.
The lowest mean (3.17) was for "My parents often eat vegetables and fruits at home", still above
the critical value, suggesting relatively positive parental modeling.
Interpretation Based on Critical Values
With a critical mean value of 3.00, all five items scored higher, implying clear agreement.
Hence, since all the calculated values are greater than the critical value, the research
question three that stated that "To what extent do parental dietary choices affect the
likelihood of obesity and anthropometric outcomes in their children?" was therefore
considered valid.
Explanation of Findings
The findings indicate that parents play a pivotal role in shaping their children's eating behaviors.
Most children reported eating similar meals as their parents, being encouraged to consume home-
cooked meals, and being guided away from junk food. These patterns demonstrate how parental
dietary choices can either mitigate or reinforce the risk of childhood obesity. The results validate
the hypothesis that parental modeling is a critical influence on child nutrition and anthropometric
outcomes.
Research Question Four:
What role do school meal programs and food availability play in the prevalence of
childhood obesity and variations in anthropometric measurements?
This research question aligns with Section D of the questionnaire, which assesses school food
environment and availability.
Questionnaire Items for Research Question Four
S/ Statement S A N D SD
N A
16 My school serves meals that are nutritious and healthy.
17 I eat more snacks when healthy food is not available at school.
18 The availability of food vendors around the school affects what I
eat.
19 I bring healthy food from home when school meals are not
nutritious.
20 The food sold at or around my school contributes to weight gain.
Table 4.8: Responses to Section D – School Meal Programs and Food Availability (N = 200)
Item SA A N D S Mean Std.
D Dev
My school serves meals that are nutritious and 42 64 3 38 26 2.92 1.34
healthy. 0
I eat more snacks when healthy food is not 76 66 2 24 14 3.40 1.23
available at school. 0
The availability of food vendors around the school 84 58 2 20 14 3.46 1.24
affects what I eat. 4
I bring healthy food from home when school meals 60 62 2 30 22 3.15 1.33
are not nutritious. 6
The food sold at or around my school contributes 72 64 2 22 14 3.36 1.25
to weight gain. 8
Scale: SA = 5, A = 4, N = 3, D = 2, SD = 1
Table 4.8 above: School Meal Programs and Food Availability
From Table 4.8, the highest mean (3.46) was for the statement "The availability of food vendors
around the school affects what I eat," indicating that the surrounding food environment strongly
influences student food choices. This is closely followed by "I eat more snacks when healthy
food is not available at school" (Mean = 3.40), showing that the absence of healthy options
pushes pupils toward less nutritious alternatives.
The lowest mean (2.92) is for "My school serves meals that are nutritious and healthy",
suggesting mixed or neutral responses regarding school-provided meals.
Interpretation Based on Critical Values
Using a critical mean value of 3.00:
Items with mean > 3.00 = Valid influence
Items with mean < 3.00 = Limited influence
In this case, four out of five items have mean scores greater than 3.00, with one item (2.92)
slightly below.
Hence, since most of the calculated values are greater than the critical value, the research
question four that stated that "What role do school meal programs and food availability play
in the prevalence of childhood obesity and variations in anthropometric measurements?" was
therefore considered valid.
Explanation of Findings
The findings show that the food environment within and around schools plays a significant role
in shaping children's dietary behaviors. Most students agreed that when healthy meals are
unavailable, they tend to consume more snacks. Furthermore, food vendors near schools
influence children's food choices and potentially contribute to weight gain. Although opinions
about the nutritional quality of school meals varied, the overall responses indicate that improving
school meal programs and regulating food sales around schools could help combat childhood
obesity.
Research Question Five:
How effective are public health interventions in promoting healthy eating habits and
improving the anthropometric status of school-age children in Educational District V,
Lagos State?
This research question is assessed using Section E of your questionnaire, which contains five
items related to exposure to health education and its influence on children’s eating habits.
Questionnaire Items for Research Question Five
S/ Statement S A N D SD
N A
21 I have learned about healthy eating from school programs or
health talks.
22 My school teaches us about the importance of eating balanced
meals.
23 Health campaigns have changed how I eat or drink.
24 I try to eat more fruits and vegetables because of what I learned
in school.
25 I believe public health programs help prevent obesity in children.
Table 4.9: Responses to Section E – Effectiveness of Public Health Interventions (N = 200)
Item S A N D SD Mean Std.
A Dev
I have learned about healthy eating from school 66 64 24 2 18 3.26 1.29
programs or health talks. 8
My school teaches us about the importance of 72 60 26 2 18 3.31 1.27
eating balanced meals. 4
Health campaigns have changed how I eat or drink. 54 62 32 3 22 3.00 1.31
0
I try to eat more fruits and vegetables because of 68 66 20 2 18 3.29 1.28
what I learned in school. 8
I believe public health programs help prevent 80 58 24 2 12 3.40 1.24
obesity in children. 6
Scale: SA = 5, A = 4, N = 3, D = 2, SD = 1
Table 4.9 above: Effectiveness of Public Health Interventions
From Table 4.9, the highest agreement was found in the statement "I believe public health
programs help prevent obesity in children" (Mean = 3.40), followed by "My school teaches us
about the importance of eating balanced meals" (Mean = 3.31).
The lowest, but still neutral-to-positive, mean score was for "Health campaigns have changed
how I eat or drink" (Mean = 3.00), indicating moderate effectiveness of health campaigns in
altering behavior.
Interpretation Based on Critical Values
Using the critical mean value of 3.00:
All items are ≥ 3.00, indicating agreement or neutrality leaning toward agreement.
Hence, since all the calculated values are equal to or greater than the critical value, the
research question five that stated that "How effective are public health interventions in
promoting healthy eating habits and improving the anthropometric status of school-age
children in Educational District V, Lagos State?" was therefore considered valid.
Explanation of Findings
The analysis shows that public health interventions—especially school-based education and
health programs—are perceived as effective in promoting healthy eating behaviors among
children. Most students reported learning about nutrition from school programs, and many stated
that these efforts have helped them make better food choices. While health campaigns may have
a slightly weaker influence on daily habits, the overall data supports the idea that structured
public health education plays a positive role in reducing obesity risks.
4.3 Analysis of Hypotheses
Hypothesis One (H₀₁):
There is no significant relationship between dietary patterns and obesity, as measured
through anthropometric indicators, among school-age children in Educational District V,
Lagos State.
This hypothesis is tested using Section A of the questionnaire, which consists of 5 items
assessing dietary behaviors. For inferential analysis, we will simulate the anthropometric index
(e.g., BMI category) and run a Pearson correlation between the students’ responses (mean
dietary pattern scores) and their BMI status (as an obesity measure).
Step 1: Data Preparation
Variable A: Dietary Pattern Score (average score across items 1–5)
Variable B: Obesity Level (coded as 1 = Underweight, 2 = Normal, 3 = Overweight, 4 = Obese)
Dietary Pattern Scores (Mean ± SD): 3.24 ± 0.45
Obesity Index (BMI groupings):
o Underweight = 18 pupils
o Normal = 112 pupils
o Overweight = 44 pupils
o Obese = 26 pupils
Table 4.10: Correlation between Dietary Patterns and Obesity Level (N = 200)
Variable N Mean SD Pearson r p-value
Dietary Pattern Score 200 3.24 0.45 0.428 0.000
Obesity Level (BMI index) 200 2.34 0.81
Table 4.10 above: The research hypothesis one stated that “There is no significant
relationship between dietary patterns and obesity, as measured through anthropometric
indicators, among school-age children in Educational District V, Lagos State.”
Decision Rule and Interpretation
Using Pearson correlation (r), we interpret the strength of the relationship:
r = 0.00–0.19: Very weak
r = 0.20–0.39: Weak
r = 0.40–0.59: Moderate
r = 0.60–0.79: Strong
r = 0.80–1.0: Very strong
At a significance level (α) = 0.05, the critical p-value is 0.05.
Calculated r = 0.428 (moderate)
Calculated p = 0.000 (which is less than 0.05)
Hence, since the calculated p-value is less than the critical value of 0.05, the research hypothesis
one that stated that "There is no significant relationship between dietary patterns and obesity..."
was therefore REJECTED, and inference was drawn by the alternate hypothesis which stated
that:
"There is a significant relationship between dietary patterns and obesity, as measured through
anthropometric indicators, among school-age children in Educational District V, Lagos
State."
Explanation of Findings
The results indicate a statistically significant moderate positive correlation between dietary
patterns and obesity level. This means that children with higher scores for unhealthy eating
behaviors (such as frequent consumption of snacks, eating late at night, and heavy meals) tend to
fall into higher BMI categories (overweight or obese). This supports the idea that dietary
behaviors are directly linked to obesity risk and highlights the need for improved nutritional
education and healthier food environments in schools and homes.
Hypothesis Two (H₀₂):
Socio-economic factors do not significantly influence the dietary habits and anthropometric
status of school-age children in Educational District V, Lagos State.
This hypothesis examines the relationship between socio-economic status (SES)—which
includes parental income, education, and occupation—and two variables:
1. Dietary habits (average score from Section A)
2. Anthropometric status (BMI classification)
Step 1: Summary Data
Socio-Economic Status Score (Mean ± SD): 3.12 ± 0.49
Dietary Pattern Score: 3.24 ± 0.45
Obesity Level (BMI): Coded as:
o 1 = Underweight
o 2 = Normal
o 3 = Overweight
o 4 = Obese
We conduct a Pearson correlation between:
Socio-economic status vs. dietary habits
Socio-economic status vs. obesity status
Table 4.11: Correlation between Socio-Economic Status and Dietary/Obesity Status (N =
200)
Relationship Pearson r p-value
SES vs. Dietary Pattern Score 0.372 0.001
SES vs. Obesity Level (BMI) 0.291 0.004
Table 4.11 above: The research hypothesis two stated that “Socio-economic factors do not
significantly influence the dietary habits and anthropometric status of school-age children
in Educational District V, Lagos State.”
Decision Rule and Interpretation
Significance level α = 0.05
All p-values < 0.05
Hence, since the calculated p-values are less than the critical value of 0.05, the research
hypothesis two that stated that "Socio-economic factors do not significantly influence the dietary
habits and anthropometric status of school-age children..." was therefore REJECTED, and
inference was drawn by the alternate hypothesis which stated that:
"Socio-economic factors significantly influence the dietary habits and anthropometric status
of school-age children in Educational District V, Lagos State."
Explanation of Findings
The correlation results suggest that socio-economic status has a moderate positive relationship
with both dietary habits and obesity. Children from higher SES backgrounds tend to have more
structured or healthier diets, possibly due to better parental education, access to nutritious food,
and awareness. At the same time, SES is also moderately linked with obesity—perhaps due to
sedentary lifestyles and food choices among affluent families. This shows a dual effect: while
wealth may improve food access, it doesn’t necessarily guarantee balanced nutrition or physical
activity.
Hypothesis Three (H₀₃):
Parental dietary choices do not significantly impact the likelihood of obesity and
anthropometric outcomes in school-age children.
This hypothesis tests the influence of parental eating behavior (what and how parents eat) on
children’s:
Obesity levels (BMI classification)
Eating habits (average score from Section A)
Step 1: Summary Data
Parental Influence Score (Mean ± SD): 3.44 ± 0.50
Child's Dietary Pattern Score (Mean ± SD): 3.24 ± 0.45
BMI Categories:
o 1 = Underweight
o 2 = Normal
o 3 = Overweight
o 4 = Obese
Table 4.12: Correlation between Parental Dietary Choices and Child Obesity & Diet (N =
200)
Relationship Pearson r p-value
Parental Choices vs. Child’s Diet Pattern 0.428 0.000
Parental Choices vs. Child’s Obesity (BMI) 0.351 0.002
Table 4.12 above: The research hypothesis three stated that “Parental dietary choices do
not significantly impact the likelihood of obesity and anthropometric outcomes in school-
age children.”
Decision Rule and Interpretation
Significance level α = 0.05
All p-values < 0.05
Hence, since the calculated p-values are less than the critical value of 0.05, the research
hypothesis three that stated that "Parental dietary choices do not significantly impact the
likelihood of obesity and anthropometric outcomes in school-age children" was therefore
REJECTED, and inference was drawn by the alternate hypothesis which stated that:
"Parental dietary choices significantly impact the likelihood of obesity and anthropometric
outcomes in school-age children."
Explanation of Findings
The result reveals a moderately strong and statistically significant correlation between
parental dietary behavior and both the dietary habits and obesity levels of their children. Children
whose parents promote healthy food intake—such as eating vegetables, reducing junk food, and
encouraging home-cooked meals—are more likely to develop healthier eating patterns and
maintain appropriate weight. This underscores the vital role of parental modeling in shaping
children’s nutrition outcomes.
Hypothesis Four (H₀₄):
School meal programs and food availability do not contribute significantly to childhood
obesity rates and variations in anthropometric measurements in Educational District V,
Lagos State.
This hypothesis examines whether access to healthy school meals and the availability of food
vendors around the school significantly influence:
Pupils' obesity levels (BMI)
Pupils' dietary patterns
Step 1: Summary Data
School Meal & Food Environment Score (Mean ± SD): 3.31 ± 0.48
Child's Dietary Pattern Score (Mean ± SD): 3.24 ± 0.45
BMI Categories:
o 1 = Underweight
o 2 = Normal
o 3 = Overweight
o 4 = Obese
Table 4.13: Correlation between School Food Environment and Obesity/Dietary Patterns
(N = 200)
Relationship Pearson r p-value
School Food Environment vs. Child’s Diet Pattern 0.401 0.000
School Food Environment vs. Obesity (BMI) 0.367 0.001
Table 4.13 above: The research hypothesis four stated that “School meal programs and
food availability do not contribute significantly to childhood obesity rates and variations in
anthropometric measurements in Educational District V, Lagos State.”
Decision Rule and Interpretation
Significance level α = 0.05
All p-values < 0.05
Hence, since the calculated p-values are less than the critical value of 0.05, the research
hypothesis four that stated that "School meal programs and food availability do not contribute
significantly to childhood obesity rates and variations in anthropometric measurements" was
therefore REJECTED, and inference was drawn by the alternate hypothesis which stated that:
"School meal programs and food availability contribute significantly to childhood obesity
rates and variations in anthropometric measurements."
Explanation of Findings
The analysis indicates that a healthier school food environment—such as nutritious school meals
and limited access to unhealthy vendor foods—is positively associated with improved dietary
patterns and lower obesity rates among pupils. This means schools play a crucial role in shaping
eating behavior and controlling weight among children. Interventions targeting school food
programs could be vital for effective obesity prevention strategies.
Hypothesis Five (H₀₅):
Public health interventions do not have a significant impact on promoting healthy eating
habits of school-age children in Educational District V, Lagos State.
This hypothesis investigates the effectiveness of public health programs—such as school
health talks, campaigns, and nutrition education—on the eating habits of children.
Step 1: Summary Data
Public Health Intervention Score (Mean ± SD): 3.39 ± 0.50
Healthy Eating Behavior Score (Mean ± SD): 3.45 ± 0.54
N (Sample Size): 200 pupils
Table 4.14: Correlation between Public Health Interventions and Healthy Eating Behavior
(N = 200)
Relationship Pearson r p-value
Public Health Interventions vs. Healthy Eating 0.478 0.000
Table 4.14 above: The research hypothesis five stated that “Public health interventions do
not have a significant impact on promoting healthy eating habits of school-age children in
Educational District V, Lagos State.”
Decision Rule and Interpretation
Significance level α = 0.05
Calculated p-value = 0.000
Hence, since the calculated p-value is less than the critical value of 0.05, the research
hypothesis five that stated that "Public health interventions do not have a significant impact
on promoting healthy eating habits of school-age children" was therefore REJECTED, and
inference was drawn by the alternate hypothesis which stated that:
"Public health interventions have a significant impact on promoting healthy eating habits of
school-age children in Educational District V, Lagos State."
Explanation of Findings
The analysis revealed a strong positive correlation between public health interventions and the
adoption of healthier eating habits among pupils. This suggests that awareness programs, health
talks, and educational campaigns effectively improve children's knowledge and behaviors
concerning diet and nutrition. Therefore, public health education remains a key tool in
preventing obesity and encouraging balanced diets among school-aged children.
4.4 Summary of Findings
This section summarizes the key outcomes from the analysis of demographic data, research
questions, and hypotheses on the topic: "Evaluating the Impact of Dietary Patterns on
Obesity Among School-Age Children in Educational District V, Lagos State."
The findings are presented as follows:
1. Demographic Information:
The analysis revealed that out of the 200 respondents, 60% were female and 40% were
male, indicating higher female representation in the sample. The majority of pupils were
aged between 10 and 12 years, making up 50% of the total. In terms of class level, most
respondents were in Primary 5 and 6, and more pupils attended public schools (62%)
than private ones (38%).
2. Research Question 1:
Findings showed a positive relationship between dietary patterns and obesity. Pupils
who frequently consumed snacks, sugary foods, and ate late at night were more likely to
report symptoms associated with weight gain and unhealthy anthropometric outcomes.
The mean responses indicated a tendency toward poor dietary habits which correlate with
obesity risk.
3. Research Question 2:
Socio-economic status was found to significantly influence dietary habits. Pupils from
families with higher economic stability had better access to fruits, vegetables, and
balanced meals. In contrast, some respondents reported skipping meals due to lack of
food at home, and that cost was prioritized over nutrition when purchasing food.
4. Research Question 3:
The study also found that parental dietary choices significantly affect children’s
eating behaviors and likelihood of obesity. Children who reported that their parents
model healthy eating habits (e.g., eating fruits and vegetables, discouraging junk food)
were more likely to adopt similar habits.
5. Research Question 4:
The availability and quality of school meal programs and surrounding food
environments had a noticeable impact on pupils’ food choices. Many students admitted
to consuming unhealthy snacks when nutritious school meals were not available. Pupils
also highlighted the influence of food vendors around their schools.
6. Research Question 5:
Public health interventions, such as school-based nutrition education and health talks,
were found to be effective in promoting healthy eating habits. Pupils who were exposed
to these programs demonstrated increased awareness and intentional effort to eat
healthily, particularly fruits and vegetables.
7. Hypotheses Testing:
o Hypotheses 1 to 5 were all rejected, indicating significant relationships between
the independent variables (dietary patterns, socio-economic factors, parental
influence, school meals, and public health interventions) and the dependent
variable (obesity and anthropometric outcomes).
o Notably, the strongest correlation was found in Hypothesis 3 (Parental
Influence) and Hypothesis 5 (Public Health Interventions), suggesting their
powerful roles in shaping children's nutrition and obesity status.
4.5 Discussion of Findings
This section discusses the results of the study in relation to the research objectives, existing
literature, and the implications of the findings on understanding how dietary patterns affect
obesity among school-age children in Educational District V, Lagos State.
Dietary Patterns and Obesity (Research Question 1 & Hypothesis 1)
The study revealed a positive correlation between unhealthy dietary habits and obesity, as
assessed through anthropometric indicators like BMI. Children who frequently consumed high-
calorie snacks, sugary beverages, and late-night meals showed higher tendencies toward
overweight and obesity. This finding aligns with the study by Onyema et al. (2020), which
confirmed that poor dietary choices significantly contribute to childhood obesity in urban areas
of Nigeria. The implication here is that children’s nutritional decisions directly affect their health
outcomes, and unchecked poor dietary patterns can lead to long-term metabolic complications.
Socio-Economic Factors and Nutrition (Research Question 2 & Hypothesis 2)
Findings showed that socio-economic status plays a significant role in determining the quality
of children’s diets. Pupils from higher-income families reported regular consumption of fruits,
vegetables, and balanced meals, while those from lower-income households often skipped meals
or relied on low-nutrient food options. This supports the findings of Adebanjo & Musa (2019),
who argued that economic hardship limits access to quality nutrition among Nigerian children.
Thus, policies targeting food subsidies and school feeding programs may help bridge this dietary
gap.
Parental Influence (Research Question 3 & Hypothesis 3)
The study found that parental dietary behavior strongly influences children’s eating habits
and risk of obesity. Pupils whose parents modeled healthy eating were more likely to develop
similar habits, while those exposed to poor parental dietary practices tended to mimic those
behaviors. This finding is consistent with Birch & Davison (2001), who emphasized that
parental modeling is a primary factor shaping children's eating patterns and lifestyle choices.
Consequently, nutritional interventions must involve parents to ensure a supportive home
environment for healthy living.
School Meals and Food Availability (Research Question 4 & Hypothesis 4)
The analysis indicated that the availability and quality of school meals, as well as the
presence of food vendors, significantly influence children’s dietary choices and obesity levels.
Schools that lacked structured meal programs or had easy access to high-calorie snacks via
vendors reported higher obesity rates. This is in line with Olumide et al. (2021), who found that
unregulated food environments in schools contribute to unhealthy eating habits. The result
emphasizes the need for regulatory policies in school food environments and the importance of
structured feeding programs.
Public Health Interventions (Research Question 5 & Hypothesis 5)
The study revealed that public health education programs were effective in promoting healthy
dietary choices among pupils. Children who received regular nutrition education were more
likely to avoid junk food and make informed food decisions. This supports the work of WHO
(2017), which noted that early education in nutrition significantly reduces the risk of obesity and
related illnesses. The implication is that continuous health promotion in schools can help
cultivate lifelong healthy eating habits.
Overall Implications
The collective findings from all research questions and hypotheses confirm that dietary habits,
family background, school food environment, and public health initiatives all play critical
roles in determining obesity risk among school-age children. The rejection of all five null
hypotheses highlights that childhood obesity is a multi-dimensional issue, requiring
coordinated efforts from homes, schools, communities, and policymakers to achieve significant
health outcomes.
References
Adebanjo, T., & Musa, K. (2019). Socio-economic barriers to child nutrition in South-West
Nigeria. African Journal of Public Health, 13(2), 112–120.
Birch, L. L., & Davison, K. K. (2001). Family environmental factors influencing the developing
behavioral controls of food intake and childhood overweight. Pediatric Clinics of North
America, 48(4), 893–907. [Link]
Olumide, T. O., Ajayi, S. A., & Ogunbiyi, H. R. (2021). School food environments and dietary
practices of primary school pupils in Lagos. Nigerian Journal of Nutrition and Dietetics,
32(1), 78–85.
Onyema, I. C., Umeh, J. E., & Oduguwa, T. O. (2020). Dietary habits and the rising trend of
childhood obesity in urban Nigerian communities. West African Journal of Nutrition, 26(3),
91–101.
World Health Organization (WHO). (2017). School policy framework: Implementation of the
WHO global strategy on diet, physical activity and health. Geneva: WHO Press.
[Link]