0% found this document useful (0 votes)
9 views7 pages

Conceptual Dependency Theory Explained

Conceptual Dependency (CD) theory, developed by Schank, represents the meaning of natural language sentences using conceptual primitives rather than words, allowing for language independence and inference drawing. The theory includes various primitive acts, such as ATRANS and PTRANS, and defines relationships through rules that illustrate dependencies among actions and objects. CD representations maintain consistency across different sentence structures conveying the same meaning, facilitating a deeper understanding of semantic relations.

Uploaded by

23pa1a45a7
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
9 views7 pages

Conceptual Dependency Theory Explained

Conceptual Dependency (CD) theory, developed by Schank, represents the meaning of natural language sentences using conceptual primitives rather than words, allowing for language independence and inference drawing. The theory includes various primitive acts, such as ATRANS and PTRANS, and defines relationships through rules that illustrate dependencies among actions and objects. CD representations maintain consistency across different sentence structures conveying the same meaning, facilitating a deeper understanding of semantic relations.

Uploaded by

23pa1a45a7
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

4.7.

Advance Knowledge Representation Techniques:

[Link] Dependency (CD)

● CD theory was developed by Schank in 1973 to 1975 to represent the


meaning of NL sentences.

– It helps in drawing inferences

– It is independent of the language

● CD representation of a sentence is not built using words in the sentence


rather built using conceptual primitives which give the intended
meanings of words.

● CD provides structures and specific set of primitives from which


representation can be built.

Primitive Acts of CD theory

● ATRANS Transfer of an abstract relationship (i.e. give)

● PTRANS Transfer of the physical location of an object (e.g., go)

● PROPEL Application of physical force to an object (e.g. push)

● MOVE Movement of a body part by its owner (e.g. kick)

● GRASP Grasping of an object by an action (e.g. throw)

● INGEST Ingesting of an object by an animal (e.g. eat)

● EXPEL Expulsion of something from the body of an animal


(e.g. cry)

● MTRANS Transfer of mental information (e.g. tell)

● MBUILD Building new information out of old (e.g decide)

● SPEAK Producing of sounds (e.g. say)

● ATTEND Focusing of a sense organ toward a stimulus

(e.g. listen)
Conceptual category

● There are four conceptual categories

− ACT Actions {one of the CD primitives}

− PP Objects {picture producers}

− AA Modifiers of actions {action aiders}

− PA Modifiers of PP’s {picture aiders}

Example:

I gave a book to the man. CD representation is as follows:

● It should be noted that this representation is same for different saying


with same meaning. For example

– I gave the man a book,

– The man got book from me,

– The book was given to man by me etc.

Few conventions

● Arrows indicate directions of dependency

● Double arrow indicates two way link between actor and action.

O – for the object case relation

R – for the recipient case relation

P – for past tense

D - destination
Some of Conceptualizations of CD

● Dependency structures are themselves conceptualization and can serve


as components of larger dependency structures.

● The dependencies among conceptualization correspond to semantic


relations among the underlying concepts.

● We will list the most important ones allowed by CD.

Remaining can be seen from the book.

Rule 1: PP  ACT

● It describes the relationship between an actor and the event he or she


causes.

– This is a two-way dependency, since neither actor nor event can be


considered primary.

– The letter P in the dependency link indicates past tense.

● Example: John ran

CD Rep: John  PTRANS

Rule 2: ACT  PP

● It describes the relationship between a ACT and a PP (object) of ACT.

– The direction of the arrow is toward the ACT since the context of
the specific ACT determines the meaning of the object relation.

– Example: John pushed the bike

CD Rep: John  PROPEL  bike

Rule 3: PP  PP

● It describes the relationship between two PP’s, one of which belongs to


the set defined by the other.

● Example: John is doctor

CD Rep: John  doctor


Rule 4: PP  PP

● It describes the relationship between two PP’s, one of which provides a


particular kind of information about the other.

– The three most common types of information to be provided in this


way are possession ( shown as POSS-BY), location (shown as LOC),
and physical containment (shown as CONT).

– The direction of the arrow is again toward the concept being


described.

– Example: John’s dog

poss-by

CD Rep dog  John

Rule 5: PP  PA

● It describes the relationship between a PP and a PA that is asserted to


describe it.

– PA represents states of PP such as height, health etc.

● Example: John is fat

CD Rep John  weight (> 80)

Rule 6: PP  PA

● It describes the relationship between a PP and an attribute that already


has been predicated of it.

– Direction is towards PP being described.

– Example: Smart John

CD Rep John  smart


● It describes the relationship between an ACT and the source and the
recipient of the ACT

● Example: John took the book from Mary

● It describes the relationship that describes the change in state.

● Example: Tree grows

● It describes the relationship between one conceptualization and another


that causes it.

– Here {x} is causes {y} i.e., if x then y

Example: Bill shot Bob


● It describes the relationship between one conceptualization with another
that is happening at the time of the first.

– Here {y} is happening while {x} is in progress.

– Example: While going home I saw a snake

I am going home

I saw a snake

4.7.2. Generation of CD representations:

Sentences CD Representations
p o d ?
Jenny cried Jenny  EXPEL  tears
eyes
poss-by 
Jenny

p d India
Mike went to India Mike  PTRANS
? (source is unknown)
Mary read a novel p o d CP(Mary)
Mary  MTRANS  info
novel
 i (instrument)

p o d novel
Mary  ATTEND  eyes
?
Sentence CD Representation

o r One
Since One  INGEST  durgs
drugs can Mouth
kill, I
stopped. c
health = -10
One
health > -10

tfp o r I
I  INGEST  durgs
mouth

Sentence CD Representation

John  Do1
p o r Mike
John warned John  MTRANS
Mike with dire John
consequence.

f
State bad
 poss-by
Mike

Poss-by
r memory  Mike
Mike  MTRANS
o John
Mike  Do2

Mike
 poss-by
John  Do1 State bad
f

You might also like