Overview of Cooperative Auditing
Overview of Cooperative Auditing
Date:2025
An overview of auditing
Evolution,Origin and Meaning of audits
EVOLUTION
The word “Auditing” has been derived from the Latin word “Audire”, which
means “to hear”. Such an expression conveys the foundation of auditing in
ancient days. However, in the post-ancient period, auditing has gone through
dramatic changes. According to Dicksee, traditional auditing can be
understood as an examination of accounting records undertaken with a view to
establishing whether they completely reflect the transaction correctly for the
related purpose. But this is not the end of the story.
Besides, the auditor also expresses his opinion on the financial character of the
statements of accounts prepared from the accounting records, so as to examine whether
they portray the true and fair view of financial statements. The term audit is used in this
sense ever since the days when public accounts were accepted and approved on the
basis of leaving the accounts read. It was Fra Luca Bartolomeo de Pacioli (popularly
known as Luca Pacioli), father of accounting who introduced double entry
bookkeeping. He defined and described the duties and responsibilities of an auditor.
Since then, there have been far-reaching changes in the scope and definition of
audit. Further, the industrial revolution in England compelled the necessity of auditing.
When the First Companies Act of 1913 came into force, it became obligatory on the
part of every company registered under it, to have the accounts audited at least in
every year.
CONCEPT OF AUDITING
Concept of Auditing dates back to ancient Egyptian, Roman and Greek Civilizations, where
commercial transactions were systematically checked and counter checked by financial
administrators. In India, Pre-Vedic literature makes references to the existence of well
developed system of accountancy. In ancient times, auditing was coupled with the levy of
tax. Whenever taxes were levied on commercial transactions, auditing became inevitable.
When a person was appointed to administer finance, the amount received and payments
made by him were checked by another official either periodically or at the time of expiry
of his term of office. The objectives, techniques and approaches of today’s audit are
entirely different from that of the past. One can say that the change in the technology,
expansion of business organization, diversification of activities have influenced and altered
the auditing scope and techniques.
Present-day Auditing has come a long way from traditional auditing. Traditional auditing
involved vouching of all transactions, verification of posting to ledgers, detailed verification
of documents, subsidiary books and the principal books of entries. This was possible because
the business entities were small, the transactions were not many, the activities were localized
and traditional method of bookkeeping was followed.
In the contemporary world, business organizations have expanded and diversified their
activities. The transactions have become numerous. The fast developing communication
technology has shrunk the earth into a global village. Transactions are made through
internet across the world. Rates are fixed over telephone. Receipts and payments are made
online. Use of paperwork has been reduced greatly. In these circumstances, it is impossible
to apply the traditional methods of auditing.
A : ACCOUNTABILITY
U : UNDERSTANDABILITY
D : DILIGENCE
I : INSPECTION
T : TRANSPARENCY
WHAT IS AN AUDIT?
An audit is the examination of the financial report of an organization - as presented in the
annual report – by someone independent of the organization. The financial report includes a
balance sheet, an income statement, a statement of changes in equity, a cash flow
statement, and notes comprising a summary of significant accounting policies and other
explanatory notes.
The purpose of an audit is to form a view on whether the information presented in the
financial report, taken as a whole, reflects the financial position of the organization at a given
date, for example:
Are details of what is owned and what the organization owes properly recorded in the
balance sheet?
Are profits or losses properly assessed?
When examining the financial report, auditors must follow auditing standards which are
set by a government body. Once auditors have completed their work, they write an audit
report, explaining what they have done and giving an opinion drawn from their work. With
some exceptions, all organizations subject to the Corporations Act must have an audit each
year. Other organizations may require or request an audit depending on their structure and
ownership or for a special purpose.
What Don’t Auditors Do?
Audit other information provided to the members of the organization, for example, the
directors’ report.
Check every figure in the financial report – audits are based on selective testing only.
Judge the appropriateness of the organization's business activities or strategies or decisions
made by the directors.
Look at every transaction carried out by the organization.
Test the adequacy of all of the organization's internal controls.
Comment to shareholders on the quality of directors and management, the quality of
corporate governance or the quality of the organization’s risk management procedures and
controls.
What Can’t Auditors Do?
Predict the future – The audit relates to a specific past accounting period. It does not judge
what may happen in the future, and so cannot provide assurance that the organization will
continue in business indefinitely.
Be there all the time – The audit is carried out during a defined time frame, and auditors are
not at the organization all the time. The prime purpose of the audit is to form an opinion on the
information in the financial report taken as a whole, and not to identify all possible
irregularities. This means that although auditors are on the look-out for signs of potential
material fraud and it is not possible to be certain that frauds will be identified.
How is the Audit Conducted?
The organization’s management prepares the financial report. It must be prepared in accordance
with legal requirements and financial reporting standards.
The organization’s directors approve the financial report.
Auditors start their examination by gaining an understanding of the organization’s activities,
and considering the economic and industry issues that might have affected the business during
the reporting period.
For each major activity listed in the financial report, auditors identify and assess any risks
which could have a significant impact on the financial position or financial performance, and
also some of the measures (called internal controls) that the organization has put in place to
mitigate those risks.
Based on the risks and controls identified, auditors consider what management has done
to ensure the financial report is accurate, and examine supporting evidence.
Auditors then make a judgment as to whether the financial report taken as a whole
presents a true and fair view of the financial results and position of the organization, its cash
flows, is in compliance with financial reporting standards and, if applicable, the
Corporations Act.
Finally, auditors prepare an audit report setting out their opinion, for the organization’s
shareholders or members.
What Do Auditors Do, Specifically?
Auditors discuss the scope of the audit work with the organization – the directors or
management may request that additional procedures be performed. Auditors maintain
independence from management and directors so that tests and judgments are made
objectively. Auditors determine the type and extent of the audit procedures they will perform,
depending on the risks and controls they have identified. The procedures may include:
Asking a range of questions – from formal written questions, to informal oral questions – of a
range of individuals at the organization.
Examining financial and accounting records, other documents, and tangible items such as
plant and equipment.
Making judgments on significant estimates or assumptions that management made when they
prepared the financial report.
Obtaining written confirmations of certain matters, for e.g., asking a debtor to confirm the
amount of their debt with the organization Testing some of the organization’s internal
controls.
Watching certain processes or procedures being performed.
MEANING OF AUDITING
An examination and verification of a company’s financial and accounting records and
supporting documents by a professional, such as a certified chartered Accountant.
Auditing is the systematic and scientific examination of the books of accounts and records of
a business. It enables the auditors to judge that the Balance Sheet and the Profit and Loss
Account are properly drawn up so it exhibits a true and fair view of the financial state of affairs
of the business and profit or loss for the financial period.
DEFINITIONS OF AUDITING BY DIFFERENT SCHOLARS
business with the documents and vouchers from which they are written up, for
the purpose of ascertaining whether the working results for a particular period,
as shown by the profit and loss account, also the exact financial condition of
the business, as reflected in the balance sheet are truly determined and
denotes the examination of balance sheet and profit and loss account
prepared by others together with the books of accounts and vouchers relating
thereto in
such a manner that the auditor may be able to satisfy himself and honestly report
true and correct view of the state of affairs of the particular concern according
to the information and explanations given to him and as shown by the books”.
F.R.M. De Paula
business concern with a view to have a correct and true idea of its financial state
irrespective of its size or legal form, when such examination is conducted with a
view to expressing an opinion thereon.” “In brief, auditing involves testing the
transactions. It has its principal roots in accounting with it’s reviews, on which it
functions of auditors who certify the true and fair view of financial
AAS-1 defines the audit and also set out the basic principles, which govern the
of an entity whether profit oriented or not and irrespective of size or legal form
evidence regarding assertions about economic actions and events to ascertain the
business or not. Auditing is important as it also protects the public from scams
Internal auditors: are permanent employees of the client and get a monthly salary. They are
primarily responsible to the management or the board of directors. Internal auditors lack
independent in appearance (are not free from financial and family relationship) from the client
since they are the employees of the audited organization, but they should satisfy independence
in (Objective). To be objective:
They should not be a member of any committee in the organization
They should provide their report not to the department heads rather to the manager.
Government auditors: are the employees of the government not the audited organization.
They are the auditors‘ of Federal government and/or Regional government and primarily
responsible the legislative or executive body. Such type auditors will assign to audit selective
government organization.
Auditing profession
Profession
Profession is the job that needs special training or skills specially one that needs higher level of
education.
Professionals – are a group of people who possess a unique skill which benefit the society;
with intention of earning livelihood through it.
Any recognized profession has characteristics to be shared with other professions.
The most important of these characteristics Profession
Responsibility to serve the public
Complex body of knowledge
Standards of qualifications for admission to the profession
Need for public confidence (recognition)
The Objectives of the Profession
The Code recognizes that the objectives of the accountancy profession are:
To work to the highest standards of professionalism,
To attain the highest levels of performance and generally
To meet the public interest, honor public trust, and demonstrate commitment to professionalism
Definitions: Ethics
Moral philosophy Systematizing, defending, and recommending concepts of right and wrong
behavior
Rules or standards governing the conduct of a person or the members of a profession
Unethical Conduct
Abuse of accounting information
Acceptance of bribes or gifts
Conflict of interest
Disclosure of confidential information
Generally Accepted Auditing Standards(GAS)
Standards are means of measuring the quality and performance of auditors. In order to provide
and maintain uniformly high quality audit work there is a need to have generally accepted
auditing standards. There are ten GAAS recognized by AICPA which are divided in to three
categories.
General standards
Standards of field work
Standards of report
[Link] Standards
The general standard stresses the important personal qualities and professional qualifications
the auditor should [Link] standard should include:-
[Link] technical training and proficiency
This standard is normally integrated as require the auditor to have
.Formal education in auditing and accounting
.Adequate practical experience of the work being performed
.Continuing profession education
.Computer proficiency and etc.
.Independence in mental attitude:- In all matters relating the assignment an independent in
mental attitude is to be maintained by the auditor.
[Link] professional care:-simply means that an auditor is professionally responsible for
fulfilling his/her duties diligently and carefully.
[Link] of Field Work: -The field work standards concerned with evidence accumulation
and other activities during the actual conduct of audit in the field. This includes:-
a._Adequate planning and supervision:-This deals with ascertaining that the engagement is
sufficiently planed and supervised.
b._Understanding the clients’ internal control:-a sufficient understanding of internal control
is to be obtained to plan the audit and to determine the nature and extent of test to be
performed.
c._Sufficient and competent evidence:- this standard concerns the decision as to how much
and what type of evidence to accumulate for a given set of circumstances to provide reasonable
basis for opinion
[Link] of report:- Require the auditor to prepare a report on the financial statement taken
as a whole, including informative (Providing information; especially, providing useful or
interesting)disclosures. The reporting standard require that:-
The report shall state whether the financial statement are prepared in accordance with GAAP
The report shall identify circumstances in which the principles have not been consistently
observed in the current period in relation to the preceding period
Informative disclosure in financial statements are to be regarded as reasonably adequate unless
and otherwise stated in the report
The report shall either contain an expression of opinion regarding the financial statement
takenas a whole or an assertion to the effect that an opinion cannot be stated. In all case where
an auditor name is associated with financial statement, the report should contain a clear cut
indication of the character of the auditors work if any and the degree of responsibilities the
auditor is taking.
Basic Principles of Auditor
Basic principles, which govern the auditor's professional responsibilities and which should be
complied with whenever an audit is carried out. These are:-
[Link],the auditor should be straightforward, honest and sincere in his approach to his
professional work.
[Link], He must be fair and must not allow prejudice or bias to override his objectivity.
[Link]: He should maintain an impartial attitude and appear to be free of any interest
which might be regarded. .
[Link]:
The auditor should respect the confidentiality of information acquired in the course of his work
and should not disclose any such information to a third party without specific authority or
unless there is legal or professional duty to disclose. It is remarked that an auditor should keep
his ears and eyes open but his mouth shut.
[Link] and competence:
The audit should be performed and the report prepared with due professional care by persons
who have adequate training, experience and competence.
[Link]:
The auditor should document matters, which are important in providing evidence that the audit
was carried out in accordance with the basic principles.
[Link]:
The auditor should plan his work to enable him to conduct an effective audit in an efficient and
timely manner. Plans should be based on knowledge of client's business. They should be further
developed and revised, if required, during the course of audit.
[Link] evidence:
The auditor should obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence through the performance of
compliance and substantive test procedure. It will enable him to draw reasonable conclusions
there from on which he has to base his opinion on the financial information.
[Link] conclusions and reporting:
The auditor should review and assess the conclusions drawn from the audit evidence obtained
and from his knowledge of business ofthe entity as the basis for the expression of his opinion
on the financial information. .
client acceptance and audit plan
.Reasons for Audit Planning
Audit planning is the process of determining an overall strategy for the conduct and scope of
the engagement. An audit plan is the specific guideline to be followed when conducting an
audit.
It addresses the specifics of what, where, who, when and how:
What are the audit objectives?
Where will the audit be done? (i.e. scope)
When will the audit occur? (how long?)
Who are the auditors?
How will the audit be done?
reasons for planning the audit work.
to obtain sufficient and competent evidence
To keep reasonable audit cost.
To avoid misunderstanding with the client
To complete the audit work based on the schedule
To assign assistant, if any.
Finally, the auditor should tour (observe) the client‘s personnel and assets controlling
technique. For example, if the auditor sees the store keeper sleeps at his/her desk with the store
door open, or the casher talking on the phone while he/she is counting money, there will be the
sign to weakness in the client‘s internal control system. Or if the auditor sees broken or obsolete
equipment, that might be the signal that plant assets are possible overvalued.
Obtaining information about the client’s legal documents
There are three documents of the client that should be observed by the auditors.
The three legal documents are discussed below.
[Link] charters and by laws
[Link] of meetings
[Link]
[Link] charters and by laws: the corporate charter is granted by the government in
which the company is incorporated. It includes name, address, date of establishment, types of
business activities, voting right, dividend allocation systems, etc. By laws include rules and
regulations adopted by the organization in order to accomplish different activities of the
organization.
[Link] of meetings: are the official records to the meetings of the management and higher
body of the organization. These minutes of meeting include the management decision such as
compensation of officers, bonus rates, dividend rates, etc.
[Link]: clients may enter in to different contracts to others like pension plans, contracts
with suppliers, government contracts with completion and delivery of manufacturing products,
lease, [Link] general, if the auditor have information about the three legal documents of the
client before starting his/her main task, he/she will be aware and inform about such information
while examining and evaluating the difference evidences of the client and finally he/she is
adequate to give suggestion and recommendation in his/her final report.
Develop overall audit report
An audit program is the detailed list of the audit procedures to be pertained by the auditor in
examining the financial statements. Before starting the work, the auditor should ordinarily
establish a preliminary program for a review this audit program should be documented in a
manner that will permit the auditor to record completion of the audit work and identify work
that remains to be done. As the work progresses, the auditor should evaluate the adequacy of
the program based on information gathered during the audit. The audit program may be
modified if the auditor believes that the planned procedures are not sufficient. The objectives of
preparing audit program are:
To assist in planning the audits so that efficient and effective procedures are applied in
accordance with the audit strategy
To provide clear instruction to staff as to the nature, extent, and timing of the audit work.
To provide a record of the work done and the conclusions drawn, as a basis for effective quality
control and to meet audit evidence requirements.
An audit program has two major sections.
The system section: this section of the audit program focuses on the procedures used to evaluate
the effectiveness of the internal control structure and it is organized around major transactions
cycles of the internal control structure.
The substantive test section: this section deals with the procedures for substantive testing of
financial statement amounts and the adequacy of financial statement disclosures. Besides this
section of the audit program is organized in terms of major financial statement items.
Scheduling the audit work
Auditors should plan or forecast the beginning and ending of the audit work. In order to
complete based on the established time in advance. One of the completeness of the auditors is
measured whether they complete their work based on the stated time in the contract.
Assigning professional staff to engagement
The final phase of planning of the audit work is assigning of professional staff to engage the
audit work. As we have been discussed earlier, the audit work should be done by those having
sufficient skill. Assistance should also assign, if necessary. Once the auditor is clear about the
objectives and internal control system of the client, he/she has to collect and evaluate relevant
evidence for his/her audit work through different techniques.
These various ways of evidence accumulation techniques are discussed below.
Physical inspection: the auditor may physically inspect the actual existence of certain assets.
For instance, the auditor may count cash box, observe the physical handling of inventories
though it is not necessary that handling of inventories means ownership because goods may be
handled on behalf of the others.
Examination of documents: the auditor may collect relevant data by examining related
documents. Thus, the auditor who wishes to verify the payment of cash for any reason may
examine or test checks stubs, for purchase of merchandise on account he/she may verify
purchase invoice, for receipts of cash from any source the auditor may check receipt stubs, and
so on. Examination of documents can be performed through:
Vouching: examining documents started with the recorded transactions (journals, ledger, F/S)
back to source documents, called test of occurrence.
Tracing: determining whether source documents have been properly recorded in the accounting
record, called of completeness.
Scanning: verifying documents through quick or selective reading of the recorded documents
of the client.
Mechanical accuracy: are checks of work performed by others such as verifying client
computations of the balance of accounts. For example, re calculating the balance of A/P, A/R,
cash, etc.
Questionnaires (Inquiry): the auditor also can collect relevant information through preparing
questionnaires. The auditor may obtain primary data (from those related persons
e.g. employees) or secondary data (from unrelated persons e.g. outsiders) about certain
information.
Confirmation letter: the auditor may obtain evidences through confirmation from the third
parties such as banks, debtors, and creditors about the balance of some accounts. There are two
confirmation letters- positive and negative.
Positive confirmation letter: is prepared when the client asks his/her or its business associates
such as banks, creditors, or debtors to give response to the auditor whether or not the balance of
the concerned account is similar. For instance, the client may ask the
creditor about the similarity or difference in the balance of Accounts Receivable and a response
to the auditor for the auditor‘s address.
Negative confirmation letter: is prepared when the audited organization asks its business
associates to give a response to the auditor only if there is difference in the balance of accounts.
Analytical review: the auditor can compute significant ratios, carryout a trend analysis or
compare and contrast different accounting data in order to gather necessary evidence for his/her
audit task. The comparison may be between current and past data, current and anticipated
(budgeted) data, company information and industry average, or current information with current
information.
Generally, auditors perform auditing based on the following steps:
Engagement - When a new client hires an auditor, the auditor first examines the client
company. The auditor studies the company's ethical background and history. Successful
auditors are always associated with ethics and professionalism. It is foolish for an auditor to
work for a client that has ethical issues in the past. Auditors also ensure that they are totally
independent from the client before accepting them. If the auditing firm has a partner that was
once a manager in the company, for example, if the audit firm and the company are related,
there might be serious independence issues. Once the auditor decides to accept the client, he
drafts an agreement stating the terms of the audit and other details, such as remuneration.
Understanding the company - Auditors study the industry and business environment of the
company. Auditors must understand how the business works, the procedures of the company,
and so on.
Assess risks the auditor assesses the risks of the company, and decides on what is considered
material or immaterial.
Develop audit plan the auditor finally plans which areas of the business he will focus on and
how much time will be spent for the audit.
Collect evidence and test internal control systems - The auditor starts collecting evidence to
verify the financial records, using a wide range of tools. It might involve interviews,
observations, tests, calculations, confirming with a professional expert on some area, and so on.
Auditors also review and conduct the company's internal control system. A good and proper
internal control system probably means that proper financial records will be produced.
Conclusion and issuance of the auditor's report - The auditor issues his / her conclusion in the
auditor's report based on the findings objectively.
Audit Evidence Meaning
The Audit Evidence is the information that the company’s auditor collects from the company. It
is part of auditing work to review and verify the company’s different financial
transactions, internal control, and other requirements to express his opinion on the objective
and unbiased view of the company’s financial statements during the period under consideration.
Types of Audit Evidence
#1 – Physical Examination
Physical examination is where the audit inspects the asset and counts them whenever required.
This evidence is collected wherever possible based on the nature of the audit.
#2 – Documentation
Under the documentation, the auditor collects written documents like purchase invoices, sales
invoices, policy documents of the company, etc., which can be internal or external. This
evidence is more reliable as there is some proof in writing based on which the auditor is
forming his opinion.
#3 – Analytical Procedures
Auditor uses the analytical procedure to derive the required data or know the correctness of
different information. It includes the usage of the comparisons, calculations, and the
relationships between the various data by the auditor.
#4 – Confirmations
The auditors often require the balance confirmations from the third party to ensure that the
clients do not manipulate the balances reflected in the financial statements. This receipt of the
written response directly from the third party to verify the accuracy and authenticity of different
information required by the auditor.
#5 – Observations
Observation is where the auditor of the company observes the various activities of the clients
and their employees before making any conclusion.
#6 – Inquiries
Inquiries are the different questions asked by the company’s auditor to the company’s
management or concerned employee in the areas where the auditor has doubts. The auditor
obtains the answers to these questions.
Advantages of Audit Evidence
It helps ensure the auditor’s accuracy and authenticity of the information furnished to him by
his client.
It forms the basis on which the auditor of the company expresses his opinion on the company’s
financial statements during the period under consideration, i.e., whether the company’s
financial statements present the right and fair picture or not.
Essentials of good audit evidence
Sufficient: Sufficiency is the measure of quantity. Audit evidence is sufficient when they are
available in adequate quantity. An auditor applies different audit procedures to obtain sufficient
audit evidence like test checking.
Reliable: Evidence obtained by the auditor is persuasive rather than conclusive. We cannot
consider such evidence 100% reliable for forming an opinion. Reliability of audit evidence
depends on its source and nature of such evidence.
Source: Audit evidence obtained within the enterprise is known as the internal source.
Evidence obtained from an outside enterprise like confirmation from the third party is known as
the external source. We consider the external source to be more reliable.
Nature: Can be documentary (like bills, vouchers), visual (like the physical verification of
fixed assets), or oral (confirmation from employees)
Relevant: Whether the audit evidence obtained by the auditor is relevant or not depends on the
purpose of audit procedures.
There are some thumb rules which helps in identifying the appropriateness of evidence
Written (documentary) evidence is better than testimonial evidence.
Evidence from external sources is more reliable.
Original documents are preferable over their photocopies.
The auditor should have a good understanding of internal control of the organization as it
enables him to obtain relevant evidence.
Evidence obtained by auditor through direct observation, inspection, physical verification, and
computations are better than the evidence obtained indirectly.
Audit Evidence: Definition, Types, Procedures, and Quality
What Is Audit Evidence?
Audit evidence refers to information or data use or collects by auditors as part of their audit
works so that they could conclude their opinion on whether or not financial statements are
prepared in all material respect and accordance with the applicable financial reporting
frameworks.
Before auditors could conclude the financial statements as a whole or any part, they need to
make sure that the evidence they obtain is sufficient enough with appropriate quality to
conclude.
Sufficient and appropriate audit evidence is important for the auditor to form audit opinions.
Audit Risks that auditors might face also depend on audit sufficient and appropriate evidence.
Audit evidence is obtained by the auditor throughout all of the audit stages, including the
planning stage, execution stage, and conclusion stages. And to gather this evidence, the auditors
use many different technologies and procedures suitable for them.
This article will discuss various topics related to audit evidence, including the types of
evidence, the procedures used by auditors to gather the evidence, and its quality.
Types Of Audit Evidence:
Auditors use audit evidence in many different forms and sources. Those audit evidence could
be data or information, physical or nonphysical. For an example of audit evidence:
Financial statements
Accounting information
Bank accounts
Management Accounts
Fixed Assets Register
Payrolls Listing
Banks Statements
Bank confirmation
Invoices
Receipts
And others documents use by businesses to support financial transactions or events in the
financial statements.
Audit evidence could also form in video, email, audio, and verbal.
Procedures To Obtain Audit Evidence:
There are many procedures that auditors use to obtain audit evidence to support their
conclusion.
Such procedures include audit inquiry, audit observation, audit inspection, analytical
procedure, audit recalculation, audit confirmation, and re-performance.
Audit inquiry: Auditor inquires management on certain business transactions or events for the
purpose of obtaining an understanding or to confirm some related assertion.
Audit observation: Auditor observes the way how certain controls related to financial
reporting perform.
Audit Inspection: Auditor inspect on certain documents or evidence that related to financial
transaction or event.
Analytical Procedure: Analytical procedure is normally used by the auditor to assess the
transactions or amounts in the financial statements through other financial and non-financial
data.
Recalculation: The auditor sometimes recalculates some depreciation expenses that prepare by
management.
Re performance: The auditor sometimes re-performs bank reconciliation that prepares by the
client.
Quality Of Audit Evidence:
The quality of audit evidence is essential to ensure that the auditor’s conclusion is correct.
If the information is not strong or low quality, the audit risks of making incorrect audit opinions
are high.
The quality of audit evidence is dependent mainly on the form and source of the evidence. Here
is the detail:
External Source: The evidence that obtains directly from external parties like customers,
suppliers, or banks are more reliable than obtaining from clients. For example, accounts
receivable confirmations that obtain from client’s customers are more reliable than the records
that prepare by clients.
Prepare by Auditor: The evidence that prepares by auditors themselves are more reliable than
the one that prepares by or obtains from the client. For example, the bank reconciliation that
prepares by the auditor is more reliable than the bank reconciliation prepared by the accountant.
Prepare by client: The level of reliability of evidence that obtains from clients are depending
on the reliability of client internal control.
Written form: The audit evidence that forms in writing is more reliable than the one that forms
in verbal. For example, management confirmation in the form of email is more reliable than the
confirmation by verbal.
Original Form: Original invoices that use to support the payments transactions are more
reliable than the copy invoices.
Since the quality of audit evidence is important, the standard or local authority that controls
audit firms required the audit firm to have the proper audit manual, policy, and procedures in
place so that the firm could maintain the quality of audit and the quality of audit evidence.
Title Independent Auditor’s Report. The title of the audit report should be simple and include the word “independent”.
indicates that the audit was performed by an external, independent, and unbiased third party.
Addressee The report will clearly state to whom it is addressed. Example: To The Shareholders Of Company Name or The
Directors
Introduction This would be a statement that states the name of the company that is being audited, the dates of the financial per
the audit covers, which is usually the fiscal year.
Responsibilities of directors
This section clearly states the responsibilities of the directors of the company being audited, and the responsibiliti
and auditors the auditor. It states that the management and directors of the company accept the duty of providing the auditor w
the financial documentation required for the audit. It also states that the documentation provided is true and accur
the best of the director’s knowledge. It is stated that the auditor’s role is to audit the financial statements given by
company. It also states that the auditor must form his opinion based on the information provided.
Basis of opinion The section states that the audit was conducted in compliance with the standards and describes the audit process a
resources. This section may be longer than the rest.
Date And place The date and city where the report was signed by the auditor.
#1 – Clean Opinion
An auditor gives an unqualified opinion, also known as an unqualified opinion, if, according
to him, the financial statements are true and fair, and there is no material misstatement in them.
#2 – Qualified Opinion
This type of audit report opinion is given by the auditor if, in the financial statements, there is
no material misrepresentation. Still, financial statement preparation is not following generally
accepted accounting principles (GAAP).
#3 – Adverse Opinion
The worst type is the adverse opinion that an auditor can give. It reflects that the financial
statements of an entity are materially misstated, misrepresented, and do not reflect its correct
financial performance.
#4 – Disclaimer of Opinion
If the auditor fails to frame an opinion about the company’s financial statements, then he gives
a disclaimer of opinion. The disclaimer can be the lack of audit evidence or the restriction by
the client to examine all the records etc.
All the investors and lenders require a clean report before investing in the business. The auditor
issues the audit report to the entity’s financial statement users. The public companies must
attach the audit report with the financial statements before filing it with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.
Contents
The audit report includes the following contents.
#1 – Title: The title should be an ‘Independent Auditor’s Report.’
#2 – Addressee: It should be mentioned to whom the auditor’s report is given. For example, the
case of a company auditor’s report is addressed to the company members.
#3 – Management Responsibility: After Addressee, the management responsibility towards the
financial statement is to be written, which includes the responsibility of management towards
the preparation and presentation of financial statements.
#4 – Auditor’s Responsibility: After management responsibility, the auditor’s responsibility is
to be written, including the responsibility to issue an unbiased opinion on the financial
statements.
#5 – Opinion: Then, the auditor must write his own audit report opinion on the truth and
fairness of the financial statements specifying the basis of such opinion.
#6 – Basis of Opinion: State the basis of the fact;
#7 – Other Reporting Responsibility: After all the above points, if there is any other reporting
responsibility, then the same is required to be mentioned, such as Report on Other Legal and
Regulatory Requirements.
#8 – Signature: Then the signature is to be done by the engagement partner of the audit firm.
They provide the required input. Below is the name of the engagement partner and the audit
firm.
#9 – Place and Date: Finally, the place of signature and the date of signing are to be mentioned.
Example
Suppose there is a company named XYZ in the U.S. As per the law prevailing in the U.S., XYZ
is required to appoint an outside auditor who has to review its financial statements to ensure the
accuracy of the financial statements.
After reviewing the company’s financial statements, the auditor will issue the auditor report
reflecting the auditor’s opinion about the accuracy of the financial statements and their
conformity to GAAP.
Advantages of the Audit Report
The management is different from the auditor, so the auditor is independent of his decision. So
the auditor’s report can provide knowledge about the integrity and honesty of the management,
i.e., whether the company’s management is true toward the company’s shareholders.
It assures the financial statements as it is issued by the professional having an unbiased opinion
as he is not a part of the company’s management. This report helps the users of the financial
statements to get assured of the truth and fairness of the financial statement.
It helps the stakeholders to get knowledge about the operational and financial position of the
company. It helps the stakeholders to know the prospects of the company as an auditor is
required to report in its audit report if there are some issues with the company which can affect
its going concern. The problem affecting going concern can be the financial or non-financial
problems that the company faces.
Important Points
The auditor’s opinion mostly covers the financial statements prepared for 12 months or one
financial year. This report is then used by the stakeholders, management, investors, the board
of directors, the government body, lenders, and other parties interested in the business.
The investors use it to assess the entity’s financial performance on the basis that only they will
decide whether to invest in that company or not.
It is used by the Government agency to assess the accuracy and completeness of tax
declarations and to check that there is no tax evasion.
It is used by the Shareholders and the board of directors to assess the transparency of the
financial statement and the integrity of the management
Course:applied cooperatives auditing
C/hr:3
SAMPLING IN ADUDITING
Rationale for and methods of audit sampling
When selecting a sample from a population, the auditor strives to obtain a representative
sample. A representative sample is one in which the characteristics in the sample are
approximately the same as those of the population. This means that the sampled items are
similar to the items not sampled. Assume a client’s internal controls require a clerk to attach a
shipping document to every duplicate sales invoice, but the clerk fails to follow the procedure
exactly 3 percent of the time. If the auditor selects a sample of 100 duplicate sales invoices and
finds three are missing attached shipping documents, the sample is highly representative. If two
or four such items are found in the sample, the sample is reasonably representative. If no or
many missing items are found, the samples non-representative.
In practice, auditors never know whether a sample is representative, even after all testing is
complete. (The only way to know if a sample is representative is to subsequently audit the
entire population.) However, auditors can increase the likelihood of a sample being
representative by using care in designing the sampling process, sample selection, and
evaluation of sample results. A sample result can be non-representative due to non-sampling
error or sampling error. The risk of these two types of errors occurring is called non sampling
risk and sampling risk. Both of these can be controlled.
Non sampling risk is the risk that audit tests do not uncover existing exceptions in the sample.
The two causes of non-sampling risk are the auditor’s failure to recognize exceptions and
inappropriate or ineffective audit [Link] auditor might fail to recognize an exception
because of exhaustion, boredom,or lack of understanding of what to look for. In the preceding
example, assume 3shipping documents were not attached to duplicate sales invoices in a sample
of 100. If the auditor concluded that no exceptions existed, that is a non-sampling error. An
ineffective audit procedure for detecting the exceptions in question would be to examine a
sample of shipping documents and determine whether each is attached to duplicate sales
invoice, rather than to examine a sample of duplicate sales invoices to determine if shipping
documents are attached. In this case, the auditor has done the test in the wrong direction by
starting with the shipping document instead of the duplicate sales invoice. Careful design of
audit procedures, proper instruction,supervision, and review are ways to control non-sampling
risk.
Sampling risk is the risk that an auditor reaches an incorrect conclusion because the sample is
not representative of the population. Sampling risk is an inherent part of sampling that result
from testing less than the entire population. For example, assume the auditor decided that a
control is not effective if there is a population exception rate of 6 percent. Assume the auditor
accepts the control as effective based on tests of the control with a sample of 100 items that had
two exceptions. If the population actually has an 8 percent exception rate, the auditor
incorrectly accepted the population because the sample was not sufficiently representative of
the population.
Auditors have two ways to control sampling risk:
1. Adjust sample size
2. Use an appropriate method of selecting sample items from the population
Increasing sample size reduces sampling risk, and vice versa. At one extreme, sample of all the
items of a population has a zero sampling risk. At the other extreme, sample of one or two
items has an extremely high sampling [Link] an appropriate sample selection method
increases the likelihood of representatives. This does not eliminate or even reduce sampling
risk, but it does allow the auditor to measure the risk associated with a given sample size if
statistical methods of sample selection and evaluation are used.
The purpose of planning the sample is to make sure that the audit tests are per -formed in a
manner that provides the desired sampling risk and minimizes the likelihood of non-sampling
error. Selecting the sample involves deciding how a sample is selected from the population. The
auditor can perform the audit tests only after the sample items are selected. Evaluating the
results is the drawing of conclusions based on the audit tests.
Assume that an auditor selects a sample of 100 duplicate sales invoices from population, tests
each to determine whether a shipping document is attached, and determines that there are three
exceptions. Let’s look at those actions step-by-step:
ACTION STEP
In non-statistical sampling, auditors do not quantify sampling risk. Instead, auditors select
sample items they believe will provide the most useful information, given the circumstances,
and reach conclusions about populations on a judgmental basis. For that reason, the use of non-
statistical sampling is often termed judgmental [Link] probabilistic and non-
probabilistic sample selection fall under step 2. When using probabilistic sample selection, the
auditor randomly selects items such that each population item has a known probability of being
included in the sample. This process requires great care and uses one of several methods
discussed shortly.
In non-probabilistic sample selection, the auditor selects sample items using professional
judgment rather than probabilistic methods. Auditors can use one of several non-probabilistic
sample selection methods. Auditing standards permit auditors to use either statistical or non-
statistical sampling methods. However, it is essential that either method be applied with due
care. All steps of the process must be followed carefully. When statistical sampling is used, the
sample must be a probabilistic one and appropriate statistical evaluation methods must be used
with the sample results to make the sampling risk computations. Auditors may make non-
statistical evaluations when using probabilistic selection, but it is never acceptable to evaluate a
non-probabilistic sample using statistical methods.
Three types of sample selection methods are commonly associated with non-statistical audit
sampling. All three methods are non-probabilistic. Four types of sample selection methods are
commonly associated with statistical audit sampling. All four methods are probabilistic.
Non-probabilistic (judgmental) sample selection methods include the following:
1. Directed sample selection
2. Block sample selection
3. Haphazard sample selection
Probabilistic sample selection methods include the following:
1. Simple random sample selection
2. Systematic sample selection
3. Probability proportional to size sample selection
4. Stratified sample selection
We will now discuss each of these seven sample selection methods, starting with non-
probabilistic methods.
In block sample selection auditors select the first item in a block, and the remainder of the
block is chosen in sequence. For example, assume the block sample will be sequence of 100
sales transactions from the sales journal for the third week of [Link] can select the
total sample of 100 by taking 5 blocks of 20 items, 10 blocks of10, 50 blocks of 2 or one block
of 100.
It is ordinarily acceptable to use block samples only if a reasonable number of blocks is used. If
few blocks are used, the probability of obtaining a non-representative sample is too great,
considering the possibility of employee turnover, changes in the accounting system, and the
seasonal nature of many businesses. For example, in the previous example, sampling 10 blocks
of 10 from the third week of March is far less appropriate than selecting 10 blocks of 10 from
10 different months.
Block sampling can also be used to supplement other samples when there is a high likelihood of
misstatement for a known period. For example, the auditor might select all 100 cash receipts
from the third week of March if that is when the accounting clerk was on vacation and an
inexperienced temporary employee processed the cash receipt transactions.
Haphazard sample selection is the selection of items without any conscious bias by the auditor.
In such cases, the auditor selects population items without regard to their size,source, or other
distinguishing [Link] most serious shortcoming of haphazard sample selection is
the difficulty of remaining completely unbiased in the selection. Because of the auditor’s
training and unintentional bias, certain population items are more likely than others to be
include din the sample.
Although haphazard and block sample selection appear to be less logical than directed sample
selection, they are often useful in situations where the cost of more complex sample selection
methods outweighs the benefits obtained from using these [Link] example, assume that
the auditor wants to trace credits from the accounts receivable master files to the cash receipts
journal and other authorized sources as a test for fictitious credits in the master files. In this
situation, many auditors use a haphazard or block approach, because it is simpler and much less
costly than other selection methods.
However, for many non-statistical sampling applications involving tests of controls and
substantive tests of transactions, auditors prefer to use a probabilistic sample selection method
to increase the likelihood of selecting a representative sample.
Probabilistic Sample Selection Methods
Statistical sampling requires a probabilistic sample to measure sampling risk. For probabilistic
samples, the auditor uses no judgment about which sample items are selected, except in
choosing which of the four selection methods to use.
In a simple random sample, every possible combination of population items has unequal chance
of being included in the sample. Auditors use simple random sampling to sample populations
when there is no need to emphasize one or more types of population items. Say, for example,
auditors want to sample a client’s cash disbursements for the year. They might select a simple
random sample of 60 items from the cash disbursements journal; apply appropriate auditing
procedures to the 60 items selected, and draw conclusions about all recorded cash disbursement
transactions.
When auditors obtain a simple random sample, they must use a method that ensures all items in
the population have an equal chance of selection. Suppose an auditor decides to select a sample
from a total of 12,000 cash disbursement transactions for the year. A simple random sample of
one transaction will be such that each of the 12,000 transactions has an equal chance of being
selected. The auditors will select one random number between 1 and 12,000. Assume that
number is 3,895. The auditor will select and test only the 3,895th cash disbursement
transaction. For a random sample of 100, each population item also has an equal chance of
being selected.
Random numbers are a series of digits that have equal probabilities of occurring over long runs
and which have no identifiable pattern. Auditors most often generate random numbers by using
one of three computer sample selection techniques: electronic spreadsheets, random number
generators, and generalized audit [Link] programs offer several advantages: time
savings, reduced likelihood of auditor error in selecting the numbers, and automatic
documentation. Because most auditors have access to a computer and to electronic spreadsheets
or random number generator programs, they usually prefer to use computer generation of
random numbers over other probabilistic selection methods.
In systematic sample selection (also called systematic sampling), the auditor calculates an
interval and then selects the items for the sample based on the size of the interval. The interval
is determined by dividing the population size by the desired sample size. The advantage of
systematic selection is its ease of use. In most populations, a systematic sample can be drawn
quickly and the approach automatically puts the number sin sequence, making it easy to
develop the appropriate documentation.A concern with systematic selection is the possibility of
bias. Because of the way systematic selection is done, once the first item in the sample is
selected, all other items are chosen automatically. This causes no problem if the characteristic
of interest, such as a possible control deviation, is distributed randomly throughout the
population,which may not always be the case. For example, if a control deviation occurred at
certain time of the month or only with certain types of documents, a systematic sample can
have a higher likelihood of failing to be representative than a simple random sample. Therefore,
when auditors use systematic selection, they must consider possible patterns in the population
data that can cause sample bias.
Auditors are interested in the following types of exceptions in populations of accounting data:
1. Deviations from client’s established controls
2. Monetary misstatements in populations of transaction data
3. Monetary misstatements in populations of account balance details
Knowing the exception rate is particularly helpful for the first two types of exceptions, which
involve transactions. Therefore, auditors make extensive use of audit sampling that measures
the exception rate in doing tests of controls and substantive tests of transactions. With the third
type of exception, auditors usually need to estimate the total dollar amount of the exceptions
because they must decide whether the misstatements are material. When auditors want to know
the total amount of a misstatement, they use methods that measure dollars, not the exception
rate.
The exception rate in a sample is used to estimate the exception rate in the entire population,
meaning it is the auditor’s “best estimate” of the population exception rate.
The term exception should be understood to refer to both deviations from the client’s control
procedures and amounts that are not monetarily correct, whether because of an unintentional
accounting error or any other cause. The term deviation refers specifically to a departure from
prescribed controls.
Assume, for example, that the auditor wants to determine the percentage of duplicate sales
invoices that do not have shipping documents attached. Because the auditor cannot check every
invoice, the actual percentage of missing shipping documents remains unknown. The auditor
obtains a sample of duplicate sales invoices and determines the percentage of the invoices that
do not have shipping documents attached. The auditor then concludes that the sample exception
rate is the best estimate of the population exception rate. Because the exception rate is based on
a sample, there is a significant likelihood that the sample exception rate differs from the actual
population exception rate. This difference is called the sampling error. The auditor is concerned
with both the estimate of the sampling error and the reliability of that estimate, called sampling
risk.
Auditors use 14 well-defined steps to apply audit sampling to tests of controls and substantive
tests of transactions. These steps are divided into the three phases described earlier. Auditors
should follow these steps carefully to ensure proper application of both the auditing and
sampling requirements.
Plan the Sample
1. State the objectives of the audit test.
2. Decide whether audit sampling applies.
3. Define attributes and exception conditions.
4. Define the population.
5. Define the sampling unit.
6. Specify the tolerable exception rate.
7. Specify acceptable risk of assessing control risk too low.
8. Estimate the population exception rate.
9. Determine the initial sample size.
Select the Sample and Perform the Audit Procedures
10. Select the sample.
11. Perform the audit procedures.
Evaluate the Results
12. Generalize from the sample to the population.
13. Analyze exceptions.
14. Decide the acceptability of the population.
The objectives of the test must be stated in terms of the transaction cycle being tested.
Typically, auditors define the objectives of tests of controls and substantive tests of
transactions:
• Test the operating effectiveness of controls
• Determine whether the transactions contain monetary misstatements
The objectives of these tests in the sales and collection cycle are usually to test the effectiveness
of internal controls over sales and cash receipts and to determine whether sales and cash
receipts transactions contain monetary misstatements. Auditors normally define these
objectives as a part of designing the audit program.
Audit sampling applies whenever the auditor plans to reach conclusions about a population
based on a sample. The auditor should examine the audit program and select those audit
procedures where audit sampling applies.
Audit sampling does not apply for the first two procedures in this audit [Link] first is an
analytical procedure for which sampling is inappropriate. The second is an observation
procedure for which no documentation exists to perform audit sampling. Audit sampling can be
used for the remaining three procedures. When audit sampling is used, auditors must carefully
define the characteristics (attributes) being tested and the exception conditions. Unless they
carefully define each attribute in advance, the staff person who performs the audit procedures
will have no guidelines to identify exceptions. Attributes of interest and exception conditions
for audit sampling are taken directly from the auditor’s audit procedures.
CASH AUDIT
Nature of cash
Cash and bank balances are liquid assets and include:
Notes and units.
Bank current accounts.
Bank deposit accounts.
Because of their liquidity, these assets represent the most vulnerable of all the company’s
assets. On the other hand, they are the most easily verified, because they can be confirmed
directly by third parties or by physical counts.
The overall objective of the audit of cash is to determine that cash is fairly presented in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
B. Substantive tests
Obtain analyses of cash balances and reconcile to the general ledger.
Send standard confirmation forms to banks to verify amounts on deposit.
Obtain or prepare reconciliation’s of bank accounts as of the balance sheet date and consider
the need to reconcile bank activity for additional months.
Obtain a cut off bank statement.
Count and list cash on hand.
Verify the client’s cutoff of cash receipts and disbursements.
Trace all bank transfers for the last week of audit year and first week of following year.
Investigate any cheques representing large or unusual payments to related parties.
Determine proper financial statement presentation and disclosure of cash.
Every business needs to maintain a certain amount of cash to use in settlement of its current
liabilities. In addition, some firms sell goods and services primarily in cash, so they may have
significant cash balances on hand from cash receipts. These cash balances may be aggregated
into a number of bank accounts, including the following:
Checking account. This is the general account into which customer payments flow, and from
which payable payments are disbursed.
Branch account. A company may operate a separate bank account for each of its branch
locations, which is intended to take in and disburse funds related to local operations.
Payroll account. This account receives funding for each successive payroll, which is drawn
down as employees cash their paychecks.
Petty cash. This account is maintained internally (it is not a bank account), and contains a small
amount of cash for incidental cash purchases.
Savings account. A client may have a separate bank account that is only used for earning
interest on excess funds.
The largest amount of transaction volume usually runs through the checking account. The
payroll account usually involves a lesser, though still substantial, number of transactions. The
total amount of petty cash held within a business at any given time is likely to be immaterial,
though the total amount of expenditures paid for by this means could be material. A client may
have no savings account at all, if it instead puts excess cash into marketable securities and other
investments.
In this course, we examine the characteristics of cash from an auditing perspective, and then
note the auditing activities that can be applied
to the cash area, with particular attention to the bank reconciliation, proof of cash, and bank
transfer schedule.
Cash Equivalents When a client’s cash balance is stated on its balance sheet, the line is
frequently listed as “cash and cash equivalents.” A cash equivalent is a highly liquid investment
having a maturity of three months or less. It should be at minimal risk of a change in value.
Examples of cash equivalents are:
Certificates of deposit
Commercial paper
Marketable securities
Money market funds
Short-term government bonds
Treasury bills
To be classified as a cash equivalent, an item must be unrestricted, so that it is available for
immediate use. If an investment cannot be converted to cash on short notice, then it should be
not be classified as a cash equivalent.
Auditor Objectives
When developing an audit program for cash, the auditor must consider his objectives in this
area. They are as follows:
To discern the internal controls over cash being used by the client.
To consider the inherent risks associated with cash.
To measuring the risk of material misstatement.
Based on these objectives, the auditor must develop an audit program that contains adequate
tests of the client’s substantive procedures and controls that are targeted at the following:
Completeness of records. Verify that the cash stated in the client’s records has been fully
recorded.
Cutoff. Prove that the transactions triggering the recording of
cash are recorded in the correct period.
Disclosure. Corroborate that the information about cash in the
client’s financial statements is properly presented and fully disclosed.
Existence. Affirm the existence of cash and that the related
transactions occurred.
Rights. Verify that the client has the legal right to the cash it is recognizing.
There is no need to certify that the valuation of cash is correct,
though one could examine whether the valuations of any foreign exchange holdings have been
properly presented.
Auditing Characteristics of Cash
There are several general characteristics of cash that can impact the contents of the audit plan.
These characteristics are:
Liquidity. An essential problem with cash is that it is highly liquid, so it cannot be traced
once it has been stolen. This is a major concern for clients that operate largely on a cash basis,
requiring multiple layers of controls to minimize the risk of loss. Given the high risk of loss,
auditors tend to focus extra attention on cash.
Account flow-through. A vast number of accounting transactions flow through a client’s
checking account. Cash receipts from revenue transactions are deposited in it, as are cash
outflows related to payments, both to suppliers and employees. This means that the auditor will
likely want to examine a client’s cash accounts quite closely as part of the substantiation of
many elements of its financial statements.
In short, the baseline case for a client’s cash accounts indicates a relatively high level of
auditing effort, especially when the client’s cash controls are weak
Auditing Activities
In this section, we provide an overview of the auditing activities associated with cash, and
follow up with more detail on selected auditing tasks in later sections.
Inherent Risk Assessment
The auditor should use his knowledge of the client to consider inherent risks related to cash.
Inherent risk is the probability of loss based on the nature of an organization's business, without
any changes to the existing environment. The concept can be applied to the financial statements
of an organization, where inherent risk is considered to be the risk of misstatement due to
existing transaction errors or fraud. Inherent risk is considered to be more likely under the
following circumstances:
Judgment. A high degree of judgment is involved in business transactions, which introduces
the risk that an inexperienced person is more likely to make an error.
Estimates. Significant estimates must be included in transactions, which makes it more likely
that an estimation error will be made.
Complexity. The transactions in which a business engages are highly complex, and so are
more likely to be completed or recorded incorrectly. Transactions are also more likely to be
complex when there are a large number of subsidiaries submitting information for inclusion in
the financial statements.
There is little need for judgment or estimates when dealing with
cash-related transactions. However, there is a possibility of transaction complexity related to
cash, especially since many transactions originating in other parts of the business flow through
the cash area. Also, there is an increased risk of fraud, due to the highly liquid nature of cash.
These two issues increase the level of inherent risk associated with cash.
Material Misstatement Assessment As noted earlier, one of the objectives of the auditor is to
gauge the risk of material misstatement. This assessment is largely based on tests of the
client’s controls over its cash. Several possible misstatements are as follows:
Timing error. An accountant may record a cash receipt or cash
expenditure in the wrong period. This mistake can arise when the accounting staff does not pay
attention to the proper cutoff of transactions at the end of a reporting period.
Window dressing. A client may attempt to adjust its ending cash balance upward, in order to
make the business look more solvent than is really the case. For example, corporate insiders
who have borrowed money from the firm could repay the funds just prior to year-end and then
take out loans again immediately thereafter.
The assessment of inherent risk and material misstatement by the auditor determines the extent
of the substantive procedures related to cash.
Substantive Procedures
Substantive procedures are intended to create evidence that an auditor assembles to support the
assertion that there are no material misstatements in regard to the completeness, validity, and
accuracy of the financial records of a client. Thus, substantive procedures are performed in
order to detect whether there are any material misstatements in accounting transactions.
Substantive procedures include the following general
categories of activity:
Testing classes of transactions, account balances, and disclosures Agreeing the financial
statements and accompanying notes to the underlying accounting records Examining material
journal entries and other adjustments made during the preparation of the financial statements At
a general level, substantive procedures related to testing transactions can include the following:
Examining documentation indicating that a procedure was performed Re-performing a
procedure to ensure that the procedure functions as planned Inquiring or observing regarding a
transaction For example, the auditor may take a sample of cash receipts and trace them through
the cash receipts journal and reductions from accounts receivable, as well as into a deposit slip
and bank statement. Similarly, the auditor may take a sample of cash disbursements and trace
them back through accounts payable postings, supplier invoices, receiving documentation, and
purchase orders.
The following are all considered to be substantive procedures for cash. Many of these items are
explained more fully in the following sections of this chapter.
1. Obtain balance detail. Obtain cash balance information for each cash account and reconcile
these balances back to the general ledger.
2. Confirm balances. Send confirmation forms to the financial institutions with which the client
does business, asking for verification of account balances.
3. Reconcile accounts. Either review bank reconciliations prepared by the client or directly
prepare the reconciliations.
4. Examine cutoff. Obtain a cutoff bank statement that itemizes
transactions subsequent to the balance sheet date, and verify that
the client has properly cut off the recording of cash receipts and cash disbursements.
5. Count cash. Verify the amount of cash on hand.
6. Review bank transfers. Examine any bank transfers for one
week on both sides of the balance sheet date.
7. Examine related party transactions. Review any unusually large payments to related parties.
8. Conduct analytical procedures. Compare the client’s cash totals to its operational information
to see if there are any disparities worth discussing.
9. Review presentation. Review the client’s presentation of information in its financial
statements related to cash, including disclosures in the accompanying footnotes.
Obtain Balance Detail
Obtain from the client a listing of all cash accounts. This listing includes the ending balance in
each account, as well as the name of the bank at which the account is located and the account
number. The auditor traces the stated ending balance to the client’s general ledger, while the
rest of the information is used to prepare bank confirmations, as described in the next section.
Confirm Balances
A key step in the auditing of cash is to substantiate the existence of a client’s cash balances.
This is most commonly achieved by confirming the amounts on deposit with the relevant
financial institutions. Cash confirmation requests are made using a standard confirmation form,
which appears in the following exhibit
Completing an audit
involves several key steps to ensure that the process is thorough and accurate. Here
is a general outline of the steps involved:
Data Collection:
Collect relevant data and records from various sources.
Conduct interviews with key personnel.
Perform physical inspections where necessary.
Reporting:
Prepare detailed audit reports summarizing the findings, recommendations,
and conclusions.
Present the findings in a clear and concise manner, often using charts and
tables to illustrate key points.
Rights of an Auditor
As per Section 17 of the Cooperative Societies Act,
“The Registrar, the Collector or any person authorised by general or special order in writing in
this behalf by the Registrar shall at all times have access to all the books, accounts, papers and
securities of a society, and every officer of the society shall furnish such information in regard
to the transactions and working of the society as the person making such inspection may
require.”
On a more general note, a housing society should make sure the Auditor is provided with clean,
comfortable and quiet surroundings to operate from within the premises and should be given
the necessary help while performing physical audits of assets.
Duties of an Auditor
He should have in-depth understanding and knowledge of society bye-laws and the Cooperative
Society Act 1912. He should:
Check membership registers to ascertain the number of shares held by each member.
Know the power of society’s officers with respect to who’s in charge of advancing, borrowing
loans and investment (one or more appointees).
With respect to loans, the auditor should check loan agreements (whether the society is the
borrower or the lender), interest due with the loan repayment cycle, actual interest received and
repaid amount received and tally it up.
Check if loans given to members are according to the legal compliance and rules passed within
the society in writing and that loans given to non- members are done after receiving permission
from the Registrar.
Any Cooperative Bank loans received are within the limit
Be well versed in physical inspection of society’s assets with different inspection techniques
required as per society.
He should also check the following:
Profit and Loss statements
Balance sheets
Income and expense statements, income tax return filing, with applicable GST and other cuts
applicable as per the Income Tax Act and Cooperative Societies Act audit cash book, bank
book, receipts and payments of financial transactions throughout the year.
In legal terms, according to the government directives,
An auditor has to inquire ,
(a) Whether The loans and advances made by the co-operative society are properly secured and
are not prejudicial to the interest of the co-operative society or its members.
(b) Whether The transactions of the co-operative society are not prejudicial to the interest of the
co-operative society.
(c) Whether personal expenses have been charged to revenue account.
(d) Whether the position as stated in the account books and the balance sheet of the co-
operative society is correct, regular and not misleading. And
(e) Whether any special issue referred for enquiry by Reserve bank or National Bank duly
enquired into and reported to the concerned.
audit are imposed bythe client, the auditor generally should issue
A. Qualified opinion
B. Disclaimer of opinion
C. Adverse opinion
30. The inventory consists of about one per cent of all assets. The
procedures.
A. Unqualified opinion
B. Qualified opinion
C. Disclaimer of opinion
D. Adverse opinion
31. The auditor has serious concern about the going concern of
capital loan from a bank which has been applied for. Then
A. Unqualified opinion
D. Disclaimer of opinion
A. Unqualified opinion
B. Qualified opinion
C. Disclaimer of opinion
D. Adverse opinion
A. Scope paragraph
B. Opinion paragraph
documents?
department?
B. Selecting supplies
36.____ is a letter from the auditor of a company that is the end result of the
audit process
A. audit evidence [Link] document C. audit confirmation D. audit report
37.__________ is the best type of report that a company can receive from an auditor
A . Clean report [Link] opinion C. Adverse opinion D .none
38________ [Link] happen when the auditor was denied access to certain financial
information or if the auditor is unable to be impartial
A. Adverse opinion
B. unqualified report
C. Qualified opinion
D. Clear report
E. None
39._________all are not reasons for planning the audit work except
A. to obtain insufficient and incompetent evidence
B. keep reasonable audit cost.
C. To avoid understanding with the client
D. all
A. _________ [Link] engagement letter includes
B. The nature of the work to be performed The
C. dead line of the audit contract
D. The amount of the audit fee
E. Limitations of the auditor with respect to detection of errors, irregularities, and
illegal acts
F. All
. _________ 41. is the measure of the quantity of audit evidence.
A. Insufficiency
B. Appropriateness
C. Occurrence
D. None
._________ 42. Transactions and events have been recorded in the correct accounting
period
A. Existence
B. Cut-off..
C. Completeness
[Link]
. _________ [Link] records or documents, whether internal or external, in
paper form, electronic form, or other media
A. Observation
B. Inspection
C. Inquiry
D. Confirmations
[Link] one is Consideration during inquiry
A. Qualifications of the individual to be questioned.
B. Asking clear, concise, and relevant questions
C. Using open or closed questions appropriately.
D. [Link]
[Link] auditor should keep his ears and eyes open but his mouth [Link] refers
A. Confidentiality
B. Integrity
C. Competence
D. Confidence
[Link] one is odd
A. Continuing profession education
B. Computer proficiency
C. Independence in mental attitude
D. Adequate planning and supervision
47. Which one is element of Standards of Field Work
A. Adequate planning and supervision
B. Understanding the clients’ internal control
C. Sufficient and competent evidence
D. All.
48.______is system of internal controls for ongoing viability
A. Risk Assessment
B. Monitor
C. Information
D. Control Activities
ANSUWER
1. E
2. A
3. B
4. D
5. A
6. D
7. D
8. C
9. A
10. B
11. B
12. C
13. B
14. B
15. C
16. D
17. C
18. C
19. A
20. D
21. B
22. C
23. D
24. D
25. B
26. D
27. D
28. D
29. A
30. C
31. B
32. A
33. C
34. D
35. C