0% found this document useful (0 votes)
28 views10 pages

SAP Memory Management and Paging Issues

Uploaded by

jaberyemeni
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
28 views10 pages

SAP Memory Management and Paging Issues

Uploaded by

jaberyemeni
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

St06/st02- Main memory\

[Link]

[Link]

1. High Paging Rate: OS Paging

Select the Memory from the SNAPSHOT menu

Is there a High Paging Rate? (Paging per hour > 20% of RAM)

 What you want to focus on here is the Page In of RAM (applicable only to windows)
and Page Out of RAM (applicable only to Unix Based OS). Is this value of 20%,

Paging Rate per Hour (Page In / Page Out):


Shows how much data the OS is moving between disk and RAM due to memory
pressure.

Example: Page In = 20% → 20% of reads are coming from disk (Windows), Page Out
= 20% → 20% of writes are going to disk (Unix).

there are a couple other parameters you want to check:

Check the parameters set for the file system in the operating system file
folder, this varies in each system.
refers to is checking how much system memory (RAM) is being reserved for
file system caching / buffers, Take note of the Current Use Percentage. If this
value is 20% or more, the system may have memory issues and at this
point,
Troubleshooting: Check the parameters set for the file system in the
operating system file folder, this varies in each system. If this number is more than
20% of RAM, consider reducing this down to 7-10% of the physical memory.

Check Current Memory Usage (including cache)

free -m

You’ll get output like:

total used free shared buff/cache available

Mem: 32000 25000 800 200 6200 4000

Swap: 2048 50 1998

👉 Here, the buff/cache column shows how much RAM is being used for filesystem
buffers and cache.

If buff/cache is > 20% of total RAM, the system is caching too aggressively.

Target is usually 7–10% of physical memory for SAP systems (to leave room for SAP
instance memory).

For example:

Total RAM = 32 GB

buff/cache = 6.2 GB → ~19% → borderline but OK.

If it were, say, 10 GB → >30% → too high → consider tuning.

short, practical way to resolve it ⬇️

🧭 1️⃣ Confirm the Cache Usage


free -m

👉 Check the buff/cache column.


If it’s large (e.g. > 20% of total), proceed with tuning.

🧹 2️⃣ Drop Excess Cache (Safe Maintenance Step)

This clears page cache, dentries, and inodes — without killing processes:

sudo sync # flush file system buffers to disk

sudo sysctl -w vm.drop_caches=3

✅ This frees up RAM immediately.


⚠️Do this only during low activity periods (e.g., night or scheduled downtime) to
avoid I/O spikes.

 Whole system:

Is there enough free memory on other systems? This can be check by selecting the
corresponding computer in the system then selecting the Memory, is there free
memory?

Troubleshooting: Redistribute the Wps as discussed in high CPU case

 User specific: Is there an individual user that is consuming too much memory?
This can be found my following the next node on Mode List

Troubleshooting: Analysis of the Mode List

St02->From the Detailed Analysis menu -> SAP Memory -> Mode List, which

can be found at the top of the window, you will see a list of users and their

EM used, Heap, etc. You want to look for the user that is using the most

memory and some questions that could be asked are:

 Is it normal for this user to being consuming this much memory?


If not, look into the user role, changing up the user specifications may
change how it interacts with the system.

 Is it normal for any user to consume this much memory?


For the current program/transaction/report that they are running, is it
normal for this program/transaction/report to consume this much
memory? If yes, you could do a STAD or ST12 trace on the program to search
for resource allocation for individual steps.

 Extended & Heap Memory:

There are three types of memory under the SAP scope and they are Roll
Memory, Extended Memory, and Heap Memory. Dialog work processes will
use up memory in this order: Roll Memory, Extended Memory, Heap Memory.
Non-Dialog work processes will consume memory in this order: Roll Memory,
Heap Memory, Extended Memory.
It is important to have enough extended memory, if there isn't, SAP Work
Processes would get memory from Heap Area based on SAP allocation
sequence for dialog tasks. Once a Dialog is using Heap Memory, the SAP
Dialog Process goes into Private Mode (PRIV mode), which means it that is
reserved memory and cannot be shared.

Take note of the Current Use Percentage. If this value is 80% or more, the system may

have memory issues and at this point,

Troubleshooting:

User specific: Is there an individual user that is consuming too much memory?

This can be found my following the next node on Mode List

Troubleshooting: Analysis of the Mode List

St02->From the Detailed Analysis menu -> SAP Memory -> Mode List, which

can be found at the top of the window, you will see a list of users and their

EM used, Heap, etc. You want to look for the user that is using the most

memory and some questions that could be asked are:

 Is it normal for this user to being consuming this much memory?


If not, look into the user role, changing up the user specifications may
change how it interacts with the system.

 Is it normal for any user to consume this much memory?


For the current program/transaction/report that they are running, is it
normal for this program/transaction/report to consume this much
memory? If yes, you could do a STAD or ST12 trace on the program to search
for resource allocation for individual steps.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

 SAP Paging:
Page memory> 80%
To resolve high ST02 – Page Area usage (e.g., ~80%+):
 🛠 Increase paging area size (via profile parameter rdisp/PG_MAXFS → restart
required).
 🧹 Optimize ABAP programs to reduce use of large internal tables.
 📊 Check for long-running/background jobs consuming page area and tune or
reschedule them.
 🔍 Monitor users/programs causing high paging via ST02/ST03N and address them.

The SAP Paging Area is a separate memory area made of:


 SAP Paging Buffer (in memory)
 SAP Paging File (on disk, if buffer overflows)
It’s used to store large, temporary data sets generated during ABAP program
execution that are not stored in roll or extended memory. It’s especially used in
classical reporting and inter-program communication.
👉 Specifically, it’s used by certain ABAP statements:
 EXTRACT
 EXPORT TO MEMORY
 IMPORT FROM MEMORY
 CALL TRANSACTION

✅ Yes — here’s a clear real-life scenario that shows how SAP Paging Area can impact
system performance and how to resolve it 👇

📌 Scenario: Large Classical ABAP Report Using EXTRACT


System: SAP ECC (ABAP stack)
Program: A custom Z-report (ZMM_STOCK_ANALYSIS)
Functionality:
 Reads millions of material stock records from MARC/MARD
 Uses EXTRACT statements to collect and process data before generating an ALV list
Symptoms Observed:
 Multiple users running the report simultaneously experience:
o 📈 High SAP Paging usage in ST02 (Page Area near 90–100%)
o 📉 Overall dialog performance slows down
o ❌ Dumps (TSV_TNEW_PAGE_ALLOC_FAILED) for some users
o OS level: High swapping/paging activity
o ST06 shows paging increasing per hour
 In ST02:
o “Page area” shows high utilization (Peak close to max)
o “Swaps” and “Page alloc fails” increasing

📌 Root Cause
 EXTRACT statements temporarily store large internal datasets in the SAP Paging area
(buffer + file).
 The paging buffer in memory fills up, and the system starts using the paging file on
disk, which is slower.
 Multiple users running the same heavy report = simultaneous large EXTRACT
datasets = paging area exhaustion.
 Once exhausted, further users can’t allocate paging memory → system either slows
down heavily or dumps.

🛠 Resolution Steps
1. Short-Term (Immediate Relief):
o 🚫 Restrict parallel execution — temporarily schedule the report in
background one at a time (SM37).
o 🔄 Clear old sessions holding paging memory (SM04 → end inactive sessions
carefully).
o 🧠 Inform users to rerun reports during low usage hours.
2. Technical Tuning:
o Increase SAP Paging area size
 Adjust profile parameters (RZ10 / RZ11):
 rdisp/PG_MAXFS → max size of paging file (in bytes)
 rdisp/PG_SHM → paging buffer size (in KB)
 Restart system if done in RZ10 (instance parameters).
o Check sizing guidelines: typically 50,000–200,000 KB depending on report
volume.
3. Long-Term Solution:
o 📝 Optimize the ABAP program:
 Avoid unnecessary EXTRACT usage; process data in smaller chunks.
 Use temporary DB tables or internal tables instead of paging for
massive data sets.
o Migrate to modern ABAP (e.g., CDS views) for reporting, reducing reliance on
paging.

📊 Result After Fixing


 ST02 → Page area utilization dropped to normal range (30–50%)
 No more dumps during report execution
 Dialog performance stabilized
 Paging file I/O reduced significantly at OS level

📝 Key Learning
SAP Paging area issues typically affect classical ABAP reports that use EXTRACT or
EXPORT/IMPORT heavily.
When paging memory is overused, it spills to disk, causing performance degradation
system-wide (not just for one user) because of the slower I/O.
Proper paging area sizing + program optimization is essential to prevent
performance impacts.

✅ In short:
Scenario: A large classical report uses too much EXTRACT → fills SAP paging area →
spills to disk → slows down system.
Fix: Increase paging area, restrict heavy jobs, optimize ABAP code to use less paging.
Good question ✅
When there’s a bottleneck in the SAP Paging area, the impact depends on the
nature and extent of the issue, but here’s how it typically works:

🧠 1. SAP Paging Area is a Shared Resource

 The SAP Paging buffer and SAP Paging file are shared across all users and all work
processes in an application server.

 If the paging area becomes full, slow, or misconfigured, any user or program
executing ABAP statements that rely on this area (e.g., EXTRACT, EXPORT TO
MEMORY, IMPORT FROM MEMORY, CALL TRANSACTION) can be affected.

🌐 2. Impact Scenarios

Scenario A – Localized Impact (Specific Users)

Suppose a single background job or a few users run programs that use heavy paging
operations, for example:

 A BW data extraction process that uses EXTRACT to build internal datasets before
transferring.

 A custom report that performs multiple EXPORT TO MEMORY/IMPORT FROM


MEMORY calls with large datasets.

👉 In this case:

 These specific jobs or users may face ABAP short dumps (PAGING_SHORTDUMP) or
performance degradation, because they consume a large portion of the SAP Paging
area.

 Other users not using paging may continue working normally.

Scenario B – System-Wide Impact

If the overall paging area (buffer + file) is undersized relative to the workload, or if
many users simultaneously run paging-heavy transactions:

 The entire paging buffer may get exhausted.

 Work processes trying to use paging will wait, resulting in dialog response time
degradation, queueing, or short dumps for many users.
 Eventually, multiple users and background jobs across ECC, BW, CRM, etc., can get
impacted because paging is shared.

🛠 3. Resolution / Prevention

Depending on whether it’s a localized or system-wide issue:

 ✅ Tune SAP Paging parameters in RZ10 / RZ11:

o rdisp/PG_MAXFS → Size of the SAP paging file

o rdisp/PG_SHM → Size of the SAP paging buffer


Increase them if consistently hitting the limit (based on monitoring in ST02).

 📝 Optimize ABAP code:

o Avoid unnecessary large EXPORT TO MEMORY or EXTRACT operations.

o Split large data sets into smaller chunks.

 📊 Monitor in ST02 (Tune Summary):

o Look at SAP Paging hit ratio and allocated/free stats.

o Watch for “EMERGENCY PAGING” situations or swap to file frequently.

⚡ Summary Table

Situation Who is impacted

One job/user uses too much paging Mostly that user/job

Paging area undersized globally Multiple users / system-wide degradation

So, to answer your question directly:


👉 If the paging area issue is caused by a specific program, the impact is usually
limited to that user/job.
👉 If the paging area is too small or overloaded by multiple users, it can affect the
entire system's performance.

Would you like me to give a real BW example where paging area caused system
slowdown during data extraction? (It’s a classic scenario.)
 Table buffer Memory
If Table Buffer in ST02 is consuming high memory 👇
✅ Resolution steps (short):
1. Check buffer hit ratio → If good (>95%), no action needed.
2. If low hit ratio + high memory, then:
o Review abap/buffersize (total buffer size) and rsdb/tabl_buffer_size (table
buffer).
o Identify large buffered tables via ST10 → see which tables consume most.
o For huge or rarely used tables, change buffering strategy (e.g., from “full” to
“generic” or deactivate if not needed).
3. If memory pressure exists, reduce table buffer size in RZ10 (→ restart needed).
4. Regularly run SAP_REORG_BUFFER to clean invalid/obsolete entries.
👉 High table buffer usage usually points to too many / too large tables buffered or
oversized buffer settings.

Common questions

Powered by AI

Improper configuration of the SAP Paging Area, especially when it is undersized in relation to the workload, can significantly impact system performance by causing high paging activity, which slows down dialog performance or leads to dumps due to memory exhaustion . To resolve these issues, the paging area size should be increased appropriately by setting higher limits on parameters like rdisp/PG_MAXFS and rdisp/PG_SHM through RZ10 or RZ11 . Long-term solutions include optimizing the programs to use less paging by minimizing use of EXTRACT and EXPORT statements and utilizing smaller chunks of data processing .

To mitigate performance issues caused by high paging rates in SAP systems, several strategies can be employed. First, the paging area size should be increased by adjusting profile parameters such as rdisp/PG_MAXFS for the paging file size and rdisp/PG_SHM for the paging buffer size, noting that a system restart may be required for changes made in RZ10 . Second, optimizing ABAP code is essential; this includes reducing unnecessary EXTRACT or EXPORT operations and processing data in smaller chunks to prevent excessive paging . Additionally, if a specific program causes the issue, limiting its execution to low-usage times or running it in the background can provide immediate relief. Lastly, regular monitoring and adjusting SAP parameters in ST02 to maintain efficient paging operations and reduce systems' reliance on slower disk-based paging are crucial .

Effective monitoring and control of swapping and paging activities in SAP systems start with regular assessments of paging and memory utilization using tools like ST02 and ST06, which offer insights into paging rates, buffer usage, and system swapping activities . Ensuring that parameters such as rdisp/PG_MAXFS and rdisp/PG_SHM are correctly set helps manage paging effectively. Furthermore, optimizing ABAP programs to minimize use of memory-heavy operations like EXTRACT aids in reducing paging needs. High swapping rates can also be reduced by ensuring efficient cache usage, tuning memory parameters, and scheduling heavy tasks during low-usage times .

The SAP Paging Area is likely to become a bottleneck in scenarios where there is a high use of paging-heavy operations, such as during the execution of classical ABAP reports with intensive EXTRACT and EXPORT TO MEMORY activities. This is exacerbated when multiple users run these processes simultaneously, leading to resource exhaustion and performance issues . Preventive measures include ensuring the paging area is appropriately sized per the system's workload demands, optimizing ABAP code to avoid large memory operations, and scheduling heavy tasks during low-usage periods. Monitoring tools like ST02 and ST03N can help identify and address issues proactively .

Poor SAP Paging configuration, particularly if the paging area is undersized, can have varied impacts. Localized impacts usually affect specific users or background jobs heavily reliant on paging operations, resulting in performance lags or short dumps without affecting other users . However, system-wide impacts can manifest when the configuration broadly fails to meet workload demands, causing slow or failed processes for multiple users due to the shared nature of the paging area. This necessiates tuning of parameters and operational adjustments to avoid bottlenecks that can degrade the entire system's performance .

To diagnose high Table Buffer usage in SAP systems, start by checking the buffer hit ratio in ST02; if it's good (>95%), no action might be needed. If both a low hit ratio and high memory use are observed, reviewing settings such as abap/buffersize and rsdb/tabl_buffer_size is essential . Identifying large buffered tables through ST10 can guide which tables might require adjusted buffering strategies or deactivation if unnecessary. Should memory pressure continue, reducing the table buffer size in RZ10, followed by a system restart, is advisable. Regular execution of SAP_REORG_BUFFER helps clear invalid entries, preventing excessive consumption .

Excessive cache usage in SAP systems, indicated by buffer/cache usage exceeding 20% of total RAM, can lead to memory pressure as the system aggressively caches to the detriment of available memory for other operations . To address this, it's recommended to tune the system to reduce cache usage to about 7-10% of the physical memory, potentially freeing up memory for SAP instance operation. Immediate remediation steps include dropping excess caches using commands such as 'sudo sysctl -w vm.drop_caches=3', with such actions ideally performed during low-activity periods to avoid I/O spikes .

In SAP memory management, dialog work processes consume memory starting from Roll Memory, followed by Extended Memory, and lastly Heap Memory. Non-dialog work processes, however, will use memory in a different order: Roll Memory, Heap Memory, and then Extended Memory. The sequence is critical for managing memory allocation efficiently, ensuring that priority is given to shared memory first (Extended Memory for dialog processes), thus delaying the transition to privatized memory (Heap Memory) which leads to 'Private Mode' and cannot be shared .

When SAP Work Processes enter 'Private Mode,' it indicates they are using Heap Memory, leading to reserved, non-shareable memory usage, which can limit efficient memory utilization and degrade system performance . To minimize such occurrences, systems should be configured to prioritize Extended Memory, increasing its capacity as necessary since the SAP work process memory allocation follows a specific hierarchy: Roll Memory, Extended Memory, and then Heap Memory. Ensuring adequate Extended Memory prevents overuse of Heap Memory, thereby keeping processes in shareable memory mode whenever possible .

When an individual SAP user consumes excessive memory, it is essential first to determine if such usage is typical given their role and current tasks . If the memory consumption is abnormal, an analysis of the user's role and the specific programs or reports they are executing should be conducted. This may involve using tools like STAD or ST12 to trace resource allocation for specific operations. If necessary, adjustments in user roles or program execution configurations might be required. Additionally, reviewing and optimizing the underlying ABAP code for the tasks involved can reduce unnecessary memory load .

You might also like