THE ROLE OF BARANGAY OFFICIALS IN CRIME PREVENTION:

AN ANALYTICAL STUDY

An Undergraduate Research Presented to the Faculty

of College of Criminal Justice Education
Burauen Community College
Burauen, Leyte

In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements

for the Degree
Bachelor of Science in Criminology

Patrick James L. Candela

Tyrone Louie Garcia
Bryan S. Sumooc
John Mark T. Alcober
Eloisa Marie A. Poleño
Jonathan Esio
Marvin Adones
Renz Mark G. Pica

2025

i
 APPROVAL SHEET

This research entitled, THE ROLE OF BARANGAY OFFICIALS IN CRIME

PREVENTION: AN ANALYTICAL STUDY, prepared and submitted by Patrick James
Candela, Tyrone Louie Garcia, Bryan S. Sumooc, John Mark T. Alcober, Eloisa
Marie A. Poleno, Jonathan Esio, Marvin Adones, Renz Mark G. Pica, in partial
fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Science in Criminology, has
been examined and approved during the FINAL ORAL DEFENSE last [Date], with a grade
of PASSED.

SOLOMON C. ALCOBER Ph.D

Adviser

PANEL OF EXAMINERS

Approved by the Committee on FINAL ORAL DEFENSE with a grade of PASSED.

[PRINTED NAME (FN/MI/LN)]

Chairperson

[PRINTED NAME (FN/MI/LN)] [PRINTED NAME (FN/MI/LN)]

Member Member

[PRINTED NAME (FN/MI/LN)] [PRINTED NAME (FN/MI/LN)]

Member Member

Accepted and approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of (Name
of Degree Program).
Date: _________

CHERON O. REYES, RCRIM, MSCJ, CCS

College Dean

ii
 DEDICATION

This study is lovingly dedicated to our family, whose love, patience, and support have
been our source of strength and inspiration.

It is also dedicated to our friends and mentors who encouraged us to pursue this
endeavor despite the challenges encountered along the way.

Above all, this work is dedicated to God Almighty, for His guidance and blessings
throughout this academic journey.

iii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

iv
 TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

Title Page i

Approval Sheet ii

Dedication iii

Acknowledgment iv

Table of Contents v

List of Tables and Figures vi

Abstract x

CHAPTER

1 THE PROBLEM AND ITS SCOPE 1

Background and Rationale 1

Statement of the Problem 6

Theoretical Framework 7

Significance of the Study 8

Scope and Delimitation 9

Definition of Terms 10

2 REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE 12

Related Literature 12

Related Studies 15

3 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 18

v
 Research Design 18

Sampling Technique 18

Research Participants 19

Research Locale 19

Research Instruments 20

Data Gathering Procedure 20

Data Analysis Procedure 21

Ethical Consideration 21

REFERENCES 23

APPENDICES

Appendix A – Research Instrument

Appendix B – Letter to the Organization

Appendix C – Consent Form

Appendix D – Research Environment

Appendix E – Transcript of Interview

Appendix F – Coded Response

CURRICULUM VITAE

vi
 LIST OF TABLES
Table Contents Page

1 [Name of the Table]

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure Contents Page

1 [Name of the Figure]

vii
ABSTRACT

viii
 CHAPTER 1

THE PROBLEM AND ITS SCOPE

Background and Rationale

The concept of crime prevention has evolved significantly over the years, moving

from traditional law enforcement methods centered on deterrence and punishment toward

holistic, community-based approaches that emphasize prevention, cooperation, and

shared responsibility. In earlier times, peace and order were primarily maintained through

reactive measures that addressed crimes only after they had occurred. However, modern

criminology recognizes that sustainable peace cannot be achieved solely through policing

or the use of force. It must be rooted in the collective involvement of local institutions, civil

society, and community members who work together to address the root causes of

criminal behavior. According to the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC,

2021), effective crime prevention must be participatory, evidence-based, and tailored to

the specific needs of each community. This shift underscores the growing view that public

safety is not only the duty of law enforcement, but a shared responsibility among all

citizens.

Across the world, community-based initiatives have yielded remarkable outcomes.

In the United States and the United Kingdom, community policing and neighborhood

watch programs have significantly contributed to reducing crime rates and strengthening

public trust in authorities (Skogan, 2019; Laycock & Tilley, 2018). In Japan, the Kōban

system, where police officers are assigned to live and work within local neighborhoods,

has effectively fostered close relationships between residents and law enforcers (Bayley,

1
2018). Likewise, Singapore’s Community Policing System (COPS) demonstrates that

strong collaboration between citizens and local leaders enhances both safety and social

cohesion (Tan, 2020). These examples highlight a universal principle: peace and order

thrive not through fear or control, but through trust, transparency, and cooperation

between the government and the people.

In the Philippines, this principle is embodied in the vital role of the barangay the

smallest unit of local government. The Local Government Code of 1991 (Republic Act

7160) identifies barangays as the frontline institutions in maintaining peace and order.

Barangay officials, led by the Barangay Captain and supported by councilors and tanods,

are tasked with enforcing ordinances, mediating disputes through the Katarungang

Pambarangay system, and initiating programs that prevent crime and promote community

welfare (Official Gazette, 1991). Their proximity to the people enables them to detect

problems early, respond swiftly to incidents, and maintain constant engagement with

residents. As representatives of government at the grassroots, barangay officials play a

crucial role in sustaining participatory and decentralized governance.

The Department of the Interior and Local Government (DILG, 2021) describes

barangay officials as the “frontliners of peace”, emphasizing their indispensable role in

safeguarding communities. Through the Barangay Peacekeeping Action Teams (BPATs),

barangay leaders collaborate closely with the Philippine National Police (PNP) to prevent

disturbances, address local issues, and raise awareness on safety and crime prevention.

Their functions go beyond enforcement they also promote civic participation, organize

educational campaigns, and encourage residents to take an active role in protecting their

community. This participatory approach aligns with the Filipino cultural value of

2
bayanihan, or collective unity, which strengthens social bonds and fosters mutual

responsibility for peace and order.

In rural municipalities such as Burauen, Leyte, the contributions of barangay

officials are especially significant. Composed of seventy-seven barangays, Burauen faces

persistent peace and order concerns such as petty theft, youth delinquency, domestic

violence, illegal gambling, and substance abuse (Municipality of Burauen, 2024). These

issues are often linked to socio-economic challenges such as poverty, unemployment,

and family instability. Despite these obstacles, barangay officials remain at the forefront

of crime prevention mediating conflicts, conducting patrols, enforcing curfews, and

initiating youth and livelihood programs aimed at deterring criminal activity. However, their

efforts are often constrained by limited financial resources, inadequate training, and lack

of institutional support. While their duties are extensive, recognition of their vital role

remains limited. Much of existing criminological literature focuses on the national police

or law enforcement agencies, leaving a research gap regarding the lived experiences and

practices of barangay officials at the grassroots level.

Recognizing this gap, the present study seeks to analyze and describe the actual

roles, challenges, and strategies of barangay officials in crime prevention within selected

barangays in Burauen, Leyte. It aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of how

barangay leaders plan and implement peacekeeping activities, how they coordinate with

law enforcement agencies, and how they engage residents in maintaining safety. By

documenting their experiences, the study highlights both the strengths and limitations of

barangay-based crime prevention, as well as the social factors such as community

participation, trust, and leadership that influence its success.

3
 This research is timely and relevant considering the Philippine government’s

ongoing efforts to promote decentralization and inclusive governance. Programs such as

the DILG’s Safe Barangay Program (2022) and the PNP’s community policing initiatives

stress the importance of empowering local leaders to adopt proactive rather than reactive

approaches to peacekeeping. Understanding the perspectives and experiences of

barangay officials in Burauen can contribute meaningful insights to these national efforts

and inform future policy development aimed at strengthening local capacities for

maintaining peace and order. Moreover, it can serve as a model for other municipalities

aspiring to implement effective community-based crime prevention strategies.

Finally, this study contributes to the broader academic discourse on local

governance, public safety, and community empowerment. It serves as a valuable

reference for future researchers exploring the relationship between local leadership, civic

participation, and social order. The findings may encourage comparative studies across

municipalities and provinces or inspire policy-oriented research that designs training

programs and evaluation systems for barangay crime prevention initiatives. Ultimately,

this study underscores that lasting peace and security are achieved not from the top

down, but from the bottom up through empowered barangay officials, active citizen

involvement, and a collective commitment to justice, unity, and social harmony.

In summary, the role of barangay officials in crime prevention represents one of

the most crucial yet underappreciated pillars of local governance in the Philippines. By

examining their experiences, contributions, and challenges, this study not only recognizes

their indispensable service but also seeks to promote stronger institutional support for

their work. It aspires to guide future criminological research, policy reforms, and

4
community initiatives toward building safer, more resilient, and more participatory

communities throughout the nation.

Statement of the Problem

The primary purpose of this study is to analyze the roles, challenges, and

strategies of barangay officials in crime prevention within selected barangays of Burauen,

Leyte. Despite the presence of policies and programs intended to ensure peace and

order, many communities continue to face persistent issues of crime and conflict.

Barangay officials, as the most accessible representatives of government authority, often

encounter numerous barriers in performing their peacekeeping functions effectively.

Specifically, this study aims to answer the following research questions:

[Link] specific challenges do barangay officials encounter in implementing crime

prevention programs?

[Link] factors contribute to the weaknesses or inefficiencies in their crime prevention

efforts?

[Link] do these challenges affect the overall peace and order situation in their respective

barangays?

By answering these questions, the research intends to uncover the root causes

behind ineffective or inconsistent crime prevention practices at the barangay level and to

propose recommendations that can help strengthen local governance mechanisms for

community safety.

5
Theoretical Framework

This study is anchored on three major theories that explain the relationship

between community organization, leadership, and crime control.

The Social Disorganization Theory developed by Clifford Shaw and Henry McKay

(1942) posits that crime tends to flourish in communities where social institutions such as

families, schools, and local organizations are weak or fragmented. When informal social

controls deteriorate, deviant behavior becomes more likely. Barangay officials, therefore,

serve as instruments of social cohesion, rebuilding community ties through mediation,

patrols, and collective activities that promote trust and mutual responsibility.

The Routine Activity Theory proposed by Cohen and Felson (1979) identifies three

elements for a crime to occur: a motivated offender, a suitable target, and the absence of

a capable guardian. Barangay officials, barangay tanods, and BPATs function as "capable

guardians" who deter potential offenders through visibility, vigilance, and consistent

enforcement of local ordinances. Their regular patrols, monitoring, and presence serve

as natural deterrents against criminal activity.

The Broken Windows Theory by Wilson and Kelling (1982) further reinforces the

importance of addressing minor offenses to prevent serious crimes. When small

disturbances like vandalism or public disorder are left unattended, they signal social

neglect, encouraging further lawlessness. Barangay leader’s quick responses to these

minor incidents show that order and discipline are valued, thereby reducing opportunities

for escalation.

6
 Finally, the Community Policing Model articulated by Bayley (2018) and Skogan

(2006) stresses that effective crime prevention depends on partnerships, problem-

solving, and mutual trust between citizens and authorities. This principle resonates with

the Filipino value of bayanihan, where community members work collectively toward

shared goals. Barangay officials embody this philosophy, acting not as enforcers but as

facilitators of peace through cooperation, dialogue, and local participation.

Taken together, these theories provide a solid foundation for understanding the

barangay’s role in crime prevention. They explain how leadership, trust, and social

cohesion contribute to safer communities and how the breakdown of these elements can

lead to social disorder.

Significance of the Study

This study is highly significant as it examines the essential yet often

underrecognized role of barangay officials in ensuring peace and order within their

communities. By analyzing their duties, challenges, and strategies in crime prevention,

this research provides a deeper understanding of community-based approaches to public

safety and governance. For local government units and policymakers, the findings offer

an empirical foundation for the formulation of programs and policies that strengthen

barangay capacity in maintaining peace and order. They may also guide the

enhancement of coordination mechanisms between barangay officials and law

enforcement agencies such as the Philippine National Police (PNP) and the Department

of the Interior and Local Government (DILG). Likewise, the study may serve as a valuable

reference for law enforcement institutions in promoting participatory and preventive

policing strategies that align with the principles of grassroots governance.

7
 For academic institutions and future researchers, this study contributes to the

growing body of literature on criminology, community-based policing, and local

governance. It provides a localized framework that can serve as a foundation for future

research exploring similar topics, such as barangay leadership, conflict resolution, and

peacekeeping initiatives across different municipalities and regions. Furthermore, it can

serve as a reference for comparative and longitudinal studies that aim to evaluate the

long-term impacts of barangay-led crime prevention. For community residents, the study

emphasizes their shared responsibility in promoting peace and safety and encourages

sustained cooperation with local leaders. Overall, this research not only documents the

present realities of barangay crime prevention but also serves as an academic and

practical guide for future studies and evidence-based policymaking toward more inclusive

and effective community-based crime prevention programs.

Scope and Delimitation

This study focuses on selected barangays in Burauen, Leyte, chosen for their

representativeness and accessibility. It explores the roles, challenges, and experiences

of barangay officials in implementing crime prevention strategies. The research involves

six participants: one barangay captain, one councilor, and one resident from each of two

barangays who will provide both leadership and community perspectives.

The study is qualitative and descriptive, focusing on understanding rather than

measuring. It does not attempt to quantify crime rates or generalize findings beyond the

chosen barangays. Instead, it provides a rich, contextual understanding of how local

leaders confront and manage crime prevention. The scope is limited to barangay-level

governance and excludes broader law enforcement operations under the PNP.

8
Definition of Term

To ensure clarity and consistency of interpretation, the following terms are defined

both conceptually and operationally as they are used in this study:

Barangay Officials. Conceptually, these are elected local government leaders in the

smallest political unit of the Philippines who are tasked with enforcing laws, maintaining

peace and order, and implementing community programs (Local Government Code of

1991). Operationally, in this study, barangay officials refer to the barangay captain and

councilors who are directly involved in planning and implementing crime prevention

activities within their respective communities in Burauen, Leyte.

Crime Prevention. Conceptually, it refers to any initiative or policy aimed at reducing the

risk of crimes occurring and their potential harmful effects on individuals and society (Lab,

2019). Operationally, this study uses the term to describe barangay-level efforts and

strategies such as community patrols, curfew enforcement, and awareness campaigns

implemented to prevent criminal activities.

Challenges. Conceptually, challenges are defined as barriers or obstacles that limit the

effectiveness of individuals or organizations in performing their assigned duties (Oxford

Dictionary, 2022). In this study, the term refers to the specific problems faced by barangay

officials such as insufficient resources, lack of training, poor coordination, and low

community participation that hinder the success of their crime prevention efforts.

Coordination. Conceptually, coordination refers to the process of organizing people or

groups to work together effectively toward a common goal (Robbins & Judge,

Organizational Behavior, 2018). In this study, it is defined operationally as the

9
collaboration between barangay officials and law enforcement agencies, particularly the

Philippine National Police (PNP), in the planning and execution of crime prevention

programs.

Peace and Order. Conceptually, it pertains to a condition in which laws are obeyed and

social stability is maintained within a community (Department of the Interior and Local

Government, 2020). Operationally, in this study, it signifies the desired outcome of

barangay official’s efforts in preventing crime and ensuring community safety.

CHAPTER 2

REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE AND STUDIES

Related Literature

Crime prevention has always been a shared responsibility between the

government and the people. Around the world, communities have long recognized that

10
peace and safety do not depend solely on the presence of police officers or law

enforcement agencies. Instead, they are achieved through the active participation of

citizens, local leaders, and organizations working together to address the causes and

opportunities for crime. This idea lies at the heart of community-based policing a model

that gives value to trust, cooperation, and shared responsibility.

In many countries, the importance of local leadership in promoting peace has

been well-documented. Bayley (2018) emphasizes that community policing rests on three

key elements: partnership, problem-solving, and organizational transformation. In Japan,

for example, the Kōban system has proven that when police officers live among the

people and become familiar faces in the neighborhood, crime rates drop significantly.

Nishimura (2015) observed that this close relationship fosters communication and trust,

allowing both citizens and authorities to address problems before they escalate. Similarly,

Skogan (2006) in the United States found that the success of crime prevention programs

depends not merely on enforcement but on cooperation between the community and its

leaders.

Another essential factor highlighted in international research is social cohesion

the sense of community and shared responsibility among residents. Sampson,

Raudenbush, and Earls (1997) argued that neighborhoods with strong social bonds tend

to have lower crime rates, regardless of their economic condition. In communities where

people look out for each other, and local leaders are visible and trusted, even minor

disputes rarely grow into larger problems. Studies in South Africa (Burger & Gould, 2017)

and Thailand (UNODC, 2019) also show that empowering local leaders through

decentralization strengthens public safety. Thailand's Tambon Administrative

11
Organizations (TAOs), for instance, are similar to the Philippine barangays and play a

critical role in organizing patrols, resolving disputes, and mobilizing residents for

peacekeeping activities.

These international findings consistently point to a common truth, crime

prevention is most effective when it begins at the community level. Theories such as the

Routine Activity Theory (Cohen & Felson, 1979) and Broken Windows Theory (Wilson &

Kelling, 1982) provide a strong foundation for this belief. Routine Activity Theory suggests

that crimes occur when motivated offenders encounter suitable targets without capable

guardians. In this sense, barangay officials and tanods serve as those guardians their

visibility discourages wrongdoing. Meanwhile, the Broken Windows Theory explains that

when minor offenses are left unchecked, they invite more serious crimes. Regular patrols,

curfews, and enforcement of local ordinances are therefore essential to maintaining a

sense of order in the community.

These global perspectives resonate deeply with the Philippine experience,

where the barangay serves as the smallest yet most influential political unit. Under the

Local Government Code of 1991 (Republic Act 7160), barangay officials are mandated to

maintain public order, enforce laws, and deliver basic services. The Department of the

Interior and Local Government (DILG, 2020) emphasizes that barangay leaders are the

"frontliners of peace", acting as first responders in times of conflict and crisis.

Tapales, Padilla, and Jocano (1998) described the barangay as a "mini

government", capable of addressing local issues independently while still supporting

national goals. One of the key mechanisms that make this possible is the Katarungang

Pambarangay, or Barangay Justice System. Through this process, disputes are settled at

12
the community level without going to court, encouraging reconciliation instead of

confrontation. This restorative approach reflects Filipino cultural values such as

pakikipagkapwa-tao and bayanihan, where dialogue and cooperation are valued over

punishment.

The Philippine National Police (PNP) and the DILG have likewise

institutionalized programs that strengthen barangay involvement in public safety. The

Barangay Peacekeeping Action Teams (BPATs), established in 2009, formalized the

coordination between local officials and the police. According to the PNP (2019), BPATs

serve as a bridge for information sharing, joint patrols, and coordination during

emergencies. The DILG’s Safe Barangay Program (2022) also encourages barangays to

develop localized strategies that address issues like drug abuse, domestic violence, and

theft proving that security programs must be community-specific to be effective.

Beyond patrols and enforcement, social programs also play an essential role in

crime prevention. Studies by Cruz (2016) and Caluya (2018) demonstrate that youth

engagement, livelihood projects, and anti-drug education initiatives significantly reduce

the likelihood of crime, particularly among out of school youth and the unemployed. When

barangays provide opportunities for recreation, education, and livelihood, residents

become more active in community life and less vulnerable to criminal behavior. This

proactive approach aligns with Clarke's (1995) Situational Crime Prevention Model, which

focuses on reducing opportunities for crime by improving environmental and social

conditions.

In the broader national framework, peace and order are key components of the

Philippine Development Plan (NEDA, 2023) and the National Crime Prevention Program

13
(NCPC, 2020). Both documents stress that maintaining safety cannot be achieved by

enforcement alone; it requires empowering citizens, strengthening local institutions, and

promoting participatory governance. DILG Memorandum Circular 2020-095 further

directs barangay officials to actively support anti-criminality campaigns, highlighting that

grassroots participation is a vital part of the national security strategy.

Related Studies

Several studies have examined the actual implementation, challenges, and

impact of barangay crime prevention programs. Ligon and Ong (2016) revealed that

barangay mediation under the Katarungang Pambarangay has effectively resolved

neighborhood conflicts and prevented escalation into more serious crimes. Their findings

affirm that community-based dispute resolution not only maintains peace but also reduces

the workload of formal courts.

However, other scholars have noted the obstacles faced by barangay officials

in fulfilling their law enforcement roles. Mendoza (2020) reported that many barangay

officials lack adequate training in conflict resolution, while Corpuz and Bual (2019) found

that most barangay tanods operate with limited resources, often without proper equipment

or consistent financial support. Political interference also poses a challenge, as the

Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism (PCIJ, 2021) documented instances where

peacekeeping programs were influenced by local politics rather than genuine public

safety concerns. These challenges highlight the need for stronger institutional support,

continuous training, and transparent governance mechanisms.

14
 Dizon (2021) found that barangays that actively implement BPAT activities

experience not only a decrease in petty crimes but also an improvement in residents’

sense of safety. Similarly, local studies within Eastern Visayas affirm the importance of

barangay leadership in ensuring safety. After Typhoon Yolanda, Villamor (2017) observed

that barangay officials in Leyte organized patrols to prevent looting and maintain order

during the crisis. Their actions went beyond governance they symbolized resilience, unity,

and moral leadership in times of chaos.

In summary, both international and local studies confirm that crime prevention

is most successful when it begins at the grassroots level. Whether in Japan's Kōban

stations or the Philippines barangay halls, safety flourishes when communities are

organized, leaders are trusted, and citizens are involved. Barangay officials, being the

closest government representatives to the people, embody this principle. Their ability to

mediate disputes, enforce ordinances, and promote social cohesion reflects the essential

truth that peace cannot be imposed from above it must be built from within the community.

The reviewed literature and studies reveal a consistent theme: effective crime

prevention begins at the community level, where trust, cooperation, and participation

among residents and local leaders form the foundation of peace and order. International

models such as Japan's Kōban System, Singapore's Community Policing System

(COPS), and the United States Neighborhood Watch Programs emphasize that

community involvement and visible leadership significantly reduce crime rates. These

practices reflect the principles of the Routine Activity Theory and Broken Windows Theory,

where the presence of capable guardians and immediate responses to minor offenses

deter more serious crimes.

15
 In the Philippine context, the barangay serves as the smallest yet most crucial

unit of governance in maintaining peace and order. Under the Local Government Code of

1991, barangay officials are empowered to enforce ordinances, mediate disputes, and

implement peace and order programs through mechanisms such as the Barangay

Peacekeeping Action Teams (BPATs) and the Katarungang Pambarangay. National and

local studies have shown that while these programs have achieved positive results,

barangay officials continue to face recurring challenges such as limited financial

resources, lack of training, political pressures, and weak community participation.

The synthesis of reviewed materials indicates that although various studies

have explored community-based policing and local governance, there remains a research

gap in understanding the lived experiences and specific strategies of barangay officials

in Eastern Visayas, particularly in Burauen, Leyte. Addressing this gap, the present study

aims to provide an in-depth analysis of how barangay officials perform their peacekeeping

roles, manage challenges, and contribute to sustaining public safety. By examining these

dynamics, the research not only recognizes the barangay’s indispensable role in crime

prevention but also proposes ways to strengthen local governance through capacity

building and participatory approaches.

CHAPTER 3

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

Research serves as the bridge between theory and real-world understanding. After

exploring the foundations of barangay governance and crime prevention in the previous

16
chapters, this section presents how the study will going to conduct the design, the

participants, the tools to use, and the methods we must applied to gather and analyze

data. Every choice made in this chapter will be guided by the goal of producing a realistic

and evidence-based picture of how barangay officials in Burauen, Leyte perform their

roles in maintaining peace and order.

Research Design

This study employs a qualitative research design to explore the challenges, roles,

and strategies of barangay officials in maintaining peace and order in selected barangays

of Burauen, Leyte. A qualitative approach is suitable because it focuses on understanding

lived experiences and interpreting meanings rather than measuring variables numerically.

Through in-depth interviews and field observations, the researcher aims to capture the

perspectives and insights of barangay officials and community members on how crime

prevention initiatives are implemented at the local level. This design allows the study to

describe the realities and complexities of barangay governance in crime prevention in a

more human-centered and contextual manner.

Sampling Technique

The study utilizes a purposive sampling technique, which is appropriate for

selecting participants who possess relevant knowledge and direct experience with the

subject being investigated. Since the research focuses on barangay official’s roles in

crime prevention, participants were chosen based on specific criteria such as their

position, length of service, and active involvement in peace and order programs. This

17
technique ensures that the gathered data are rich, reliable, and directly aligned with the

study s objectives.

Research Participants

The participants of the study consist of six individuals selected from two barangays

in Burauen, Leyte comprising one barangay captain, one barangay councilor, and one

resident from each barangay. This composition provides a balanced perspective,

combining leadership insights from barangay officials and community viewpoints from

residents. The barangay captain and councilor contribute knowledge on policy

implementation and coordination with law enforcement agencies, while residents share

their observations and experiences regarding the effectiveness of barangay

peacekeeping initiatives.

Research Locale

The study is conducted in the Municipality of Burauen, Leyte, one of the largest

municipalities in the province. It consists of seventy-seven barangays and represents a

mix of rural and semi-urban communities. Burauen is known for its cultural diversity,

strong community ties, and social challenges such as theft, youth delinquency, and

substance abuse conditions that make it a relevant setting for a study on local crime

prevention. The chosen barangays reflect typical conditions in the municipality, providing

an ideal environment to examine the everyday practices and challenges faced by

barangay officials in maintaining peace and order.

Research Instrument

18
 The main instrument for data collection is a semi-structured interview guide,

designed to elicit in-depth responses from participants. The guide contains open-ended

questions focusing on barangay official’s experiences, challenges, and strategies in

implementing crime prevention activities. This format allows flexibility participants can

freely express their views while keeping the discussion focused on the study's goals. The

interview guide will be validated by two criminology faculty experts to ensure clarity,

relevance, and alignment with the research objectives. Additionally, a field notebook will

be used for taking notes on non-verbal cues and environmental observations during

interviews.

Data Gathering Procedure

Before conducting interviews, the researcher will secure formal approval from the

municipal government and concerned barangay captains. After permission is granted,

participants will be informed about the purpose, objectives, and confidentiality of the

study. Each interview will be scheduled at a convenient time and place for the participants

to ensure comfort and openness. Interviews will last approximately 10-15 minutes and,

with consent, will be audio-recorded and later transcribed verbatim. Observation notes

will also be taken to capture important contextual details. All collected data will be securely

stored, and participant identities will be kept strictly confidential.

Data Analysis Procedure

The researcher will employ thematic analysis, a qualitative method for identifying

and interpreting recurring patterns or themes from the data. After transcription, the

19
researcher will read and review the responses multiple times to gain immersion, followed

by coding and categorizing meaningful statements. These codes will then be clustered

into themes representing the common experiences and viewpoints of participants.

To ensure the trustworthiness of findings, the study will follow Lincoln and Guba's (1985)

four criteria:

Credibility: verified through participant confirmation or member checking.

Dependability: maintained by keeping a detailed record of all procedures and decisions

made during data collection.

Transferability: ensured through rich contextual descriptions so that other researchers

can relate the findings to similar settings; and

Confirmability: achieved by maintaining researcher neutrality and transparency in data

interpretation.

Ethical Considerations

The study upholds ethical principles in conducting research involving human

participants. Before participation, respondents will be informed of the study’s objectives,

procedures, and their rights, including voluntary participation and confidentiality. Written

informed consent will be obtained before interviews begin. Participants may withdraw

from the study at any time without penalty. Real names or identifying information will not

appear in any report or presentation, ensuring privacy and protection. Throughout the

research process, respect, honesty, and integrity will guide the researcher's conduct,

safeguarding the dignity and welfare of all participants.

20
References

21
Bayley, D. H. (2018). Policing in America: Assessment and prospects. National Policing

Institute. [Link]

and-prospects/

Caluya, M. (2018). Community involvement and crime prevention strategies in the

Philippines. Philippine Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 10(2), 45–59.

[Link]

me_prevention_strategies_in_the_Philippines

Cohen, L. E., & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity

approach. American Sociological Review, 44(4), 588–608.

[Link]

n%201979%20Routine%[Link]

Clarke, R. V. (1995). Situational crime prevention: Successful case studies (2nd ed.).

Harrow and Heston.

[Link]

[Link]

Department of the Interior and Local Government. (1991). Republic Act No. 7160, The

Local Government Code of 1991. [Link]

[Link]

Department of the Interior and Local Government. (2010). Memorandum Circular on

Barangay Peacekeeping Action Teams (BPATs).

[Link]

[Link]

22
Department of the Interior and Local Government. (2022). Memorandum Circular on the

Strengthening of Barangay Tanods and BPATs.

[Link]

20221019_1976dafd8b.pdf

Doquilla, F. L., Ayeo-eo, S. P., & Almerol, P. M. (2023). Barangay Peacekeeping Action

Team of selected barangays of Cabanatuan City, Nueva Ecija. EPRA International Journal

of Multidisciplinary Research (IJMR).

[Link]

Lab, S. P. (2019). Crime prevention: Approaches, practices, and evaluations (10th ed.).

Routledge. [Link]

Evaluations/Lab/p/book/9780367272952

Laycock, G., & Tilley, N. (2018). Implementing crime reduction: Lessons from successful

practice. Springer. [Link]

Local Government Academy. (2015). Barangay primer (6th ed.). Department of the

Interior and Local Government.

[Link]

Mark, E. (2010). Handbook on the crime prevention guidelines: Making them work. United

Nations Office on Drugs and Crime.

[Link]

_-_Making_them_work.pdf

23
May-Chen, L. (2022). Level of effectiveness of the Barangay Peacekeeping Action Team

in relation to public safety and the implementation of curfew hours as perceived by 50th

Barangay residents. Middle East Journal of Applied Science & Technology, 5(2), 161–

177.

[Link]

arangay_Peacekeeping_Action_Team_in_Relation_to_Public_Safety_and_the_Implem

entation_of_Curfew_Hours_as_Perceived_by_50th_Barangay_Residents

Municipality of Burauen. (2024). Socio-economic profile of Burauen, Leyte.

[Link]

National Economic and Development Authority. (2023). Philippine Development Plan

2023–2028. [Link]

National Historical Commission of the Philippines. (2020). History of barangay

governance in the Philippines. [Link]

the-philippines/

Oxford Dictionary. (2022). Oxford English Dictionary (10th ed.). Oxford University Press.

[Link]

Philippine Statistics Authority. (2022). Barangay profiles and statistical summaries 2022.

[Link]

Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2018). Organizational behavior (18th ed.). Pearson.

[Link]

behavior/P200000007748

24
Shaw, C. R., & McKay, H. D. (1942). Juvenile delinquency and urban areas. University of

Chicago Press. [Link]

Skogan, W. G. (2006). Police and community in Chicago: A tale of three cities. Oxford

University Press. [Link]

Tan, K. (2020). Community policing in Singapore: Practice and challenges. Asian Journal

of Criminology, 15(3), 233–247. [Link]

09310-8

United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2021). Community-based crime prevention:

United Nations standards and norms. [Link]

reform/[Link]

Villamor, M. R. (2017). Grassroots leadership in disaster and peacekeeping: Lessons

from Leyte after Typhoon Yolanda. Philippine Sociological Review, 65(2), 75–89.

[Link]

Wilson, J. Q., & Kelling, G. L. (1982). Broken windows: The police and neighborhood

[Link] Atlantic Monthly, 249(3), 29–38.

[Link]

25