Pakistan has one of the highest deforestation rates in Asia, with an
annual deforestation rate of 0.2% to 0.5% (FAO, 2020).
Forest cover in Pakistan is only 5.1% of the total land area, far
below the recommended 25% by international environmental
standards (World Bank, 2021).
Between 2000 and 2020, Pakistan lost approximately 14,000
hectares of forest annually (UNEP, 2021).
Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KPK): Home to some of Pakistan’s most
biodiverse forests, KPK has experienced significant deforestation
due to illegal logging and agricultural encroachment. Between 2000
and 2020, the province lost 14% of its forest cover (FAO, 2020).
Northern Areas (Gilgit-Baltistan and Azad Kashmir): These
regions, known for their temperate forests, have seen a 12%
reduction in forest cover over the past two decades, primarily
due to timber mafias and unsustainable land use practices (WWF
Pakistan, 2021).
The key factor of deforestation is illegal logging. The amount of wood
consumed, and the total amount of wood harvested from State forests in
Pakistan is used as basic information to estimate the level of illegal wood
harvested. It was documented that the illegally harvested wood was four
times more than the legal wood harvested. Illegal logging is considered an
important part of the underground market [4]. Forests in the areas of
Kashmir and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa are vulnerable to illegal harvesting of
timber by militant groups. Illegal timber is being smuggled between
Pakistan and Afghanistan. Timber that is smuggled from Pakistan is then
sent back to Pakistan as mentioning it is duty-free Afghan timber. After the
wood being smuggled in Pakistan, it is transported to Karachi and further
to the Gulf States [5].
The INPE is a highly credible and authoritative source for
deforestation data, particularly in the Brazilian Amazon. Its use of
advanced satellite technology and transparent reporting makes it
a reliable reference. However, since the data covers deforestation
trends upto 2012, Brazil may have experienced significant
political and environmental changes, making their evidence
outdated.
Now let me tell you why enforcement of strict laws is a better method of
preventing deforestation than other options such as community
involvement or awareness. Firstly, strict laws are necessary since they
give directions as well as punishment for defiance that will serve as a
powerful deterrent against offenses such as unlawful logging. So,
whenever there is enforcement of strict laws they make people
responsible and ensure that perpetrators face severe consequences, thus
minimizing deforestation cases. For example, the enforcement of the
forest code in Brazil resulted in an 84% reduction in deforestation rates
between 2004 and 2012 due to its effective monitoring systems and the
implementation of heavy fines. Indonesia’s Timber Legality Assurance
System (SVLK) is another great example. It reduced illegal logging by 75%
between 2015 and 2020 by ensuring that all timber products were legally
sourced and documented. This proves that accountability mechanisms
work.