Student AI Disclosure Form
Uploaded by
Jay-Justin RoseStudent AI Disclosure Form
Uploaded by
Jay-Justin RoseCommon questions
Powered by AIThe document advises students to contact their instructors if they have questions regarding the acceptable use of AI tools in their assignments. This approach ensures that students understand the specific guidelines and permissions regarding AI usage within their courses .
AI use is considered 'full' when it is integral to the assessment itself. This includes minimal assistance for organizing thoughts and integrating various viewpoints, moderate assistance for drafting outlines and suggesting structures, and significant assistance for generating summaries from discussions or collating research findings. The criteria focus on how extensive AI involvement is in creating and evaluating the content .
The document outlines several levels of AI assistance for student assignments: No AI, AI as a Study Tool, AI for Idea Generation, AI as Editor, AI as Output Evaluated, and Full AI. Each level specifies different scopes of use. 'No AI' means no aid from AI tools, ensuring personal understanding and alignment with course outcomes. 'AI as a Study Tool' includes using AI minimally for preparing review materials, moderately as a supportive tutor, or significantly with peers for creating study guides. 'AI for Idea Generation' involves minimal use for brainstorming, moderate for assignment structure, or significant assistance for expanding thoughts or creating drafts. 'AI as Editor' ranges from identifying errors to style suggestions, requiring comprehensive edits. For 'AI as Output Evaluated,' minimal to significant AI assistance is used in evaluating drafts. 'Full AI' involves AI as an integral part of the assessment process, from organizing thoughts to generating summaries .
Students are responsible for accurately documenting the AI tools used, the level and purpose of AI assistance, and ensuring that their use complies with the guidelines set by their instructor. This involves stating how they have modified the AI's output and possibly uploading the transcript from the AI tool, to maintain academic integrity and transparency .
AI can be employed as a study tool with varying levels of assistance. Minimal assistance allows for preparing review materials. Moderate use involves AI as a supportive tutor, while significant assistance includes collaboration with other students to create study guides and conduct personalized tutor sessions. These approaches leverage AI to enhance the study experience while varying the depth of AI integration .
The document instructs students to select and document the specific AI tools used for assignments, specify the level of AI assistance, and describe the tasks for which AI was utilized. Students must also provide the AI prompts used and upload the AI tool transcript if available, ensuring detailed accountability and transparency in their work .
AI assistance used minimally as an editor involves identifying grammar and spelling errors. When used moderately, it applies style suggestions to the textual content. Significant AI assistance encompasses making content enhancements and comprehensive edits, requiring deeper involvement and changes in the text .
Disclosing AI use in academic settings is significant because it ensures transparency in how student work is produced and the extent of AI involvement. It helps educators understand the student's personal grasp of the subject against the aiding role of AI tools. The disclosure is also crucial for aligning with course outcomes and ethical adherence to academic standards .
The document mandates that 'no AI assistance' is not an option in the AI as Editor section because utilizing AI tools for editing is considered essential for assignments in this context. This requirement likely stems from the expectation that editing, as a technical aspect, benefits from AI's precision in identifying errors and enhancing style, thereby standardizing and possibly improving the quality and consistency of academic submissions .
For AI in brainstorming, minimal assistance involves initial idea generation, moderate helps in structuring assignments, and significant expands initial thoughts and drafts or creates creative content. In contrast, AI as an editor with minimal assistance is limited to grammar correction, moderate includes stylistic edits, and significant involves comprehensive content enhancements. Both roles use varying AI engagement levels tailored to the particularity of the task—creative thought generation versus refinement of existing content .