0% found this document useful (0 votes)
16 views8 pages

MGIT Procedure Manual for TB Testing

The document is a procedure manual for the BACTEC™ MGIT 960™ TB System, detailing methods for culturing mycobacteria and conducting drug susceptibility testing. It includes references to various studies and evaluations related to the effectiveness of the MGIT system compared to traditional methods. The manual is prepared for the Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics by experts in the field.

Uploaded by

rdtcartoons1
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
16 views8 pages

MGIT Procedure Manual for TB Testing

The document is a procedure manual for the BACTEC™ MGIT 960™ TB System, detailing methods for culturing mycobacteria and conducting drug susceptibility testing. It includes references to various studies and evaluations related to the effectiveness of the MGIT system compared to traditional methods. The manual is prepared for the Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics by experts in the field.

Uploaded by

rdtcartoons1
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Prepared for the Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics

MGIT TM

Procedure Manual

For BACTEC™ MGIT 960™ TB System


(Also applicable for Manual MGIT)
Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT)
Culture and Drug Susceptibility Demonstration Projects

by

Salman H. Siddiqi, Ph.D.


(BD Fellow, Sparks, Maryland, USA )
and
Sabine Rüsch-Gerdes, Ph.D.
(Director, National Reference Center for
Mycobacteria, Borstel, Germany)

July 2006
Section IV: References

1
Isenberg HD (Editor). Clinical Microbiology Procedure Handbook, Vol.1. American Society for
Microbiology (Publisher), Washington, D.C.
2
Kent PT, Kubica GP. Public Health Microbiology, a Guide for the Level III Laboratory.
Centers for Disease Control, Division of Laboratory Training and Consultation. Atlanta, GA, US
Department of Health and Human Services, US Government Printing Office, 1985.
3
Middlebrook O, Cohn ALL. Bacteriology of tuberculosis: Laboratory Methods. Am J Pub
Health. 1958;48:844-853.
4
DeLand FH, Wagner RN Jr. Early detection of bacterial growth with carbon-14 labeled
glucose. Radiology 1969;92:154:155.
5
Kirihara JAL, Hillier SL, Coyle MB. Improved detection times of Mycobacterium avium
complex and M. tuberculosis with the BACTEC radiometric system. J Clin Microbiol.
1985;22:841-845.
6
Morgan MA, Horstmeier CD, DeYoung DR, Roberts GD. Comparison of a radiometric
method (BACTEC) and conventional culture media for recovery of mycobacteria from smear-
negative specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 1983;18:384-388
7
Roberts GD, Goodman NL, Heifets L, et al. Evaluation of the BACTEC radiometric method for
recovery of mycobacteria and drug susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from
acid-fast smear- positive specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 1983;18:689-696.
8
Siddiqi SH, Libonati JP, Middlebrook G. Evaluation of a rapid radiometric method for drug
susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol. 1981;13:908-912.
9
Siddiqi SH, Hawkins JE , Laszlo A. Inter-laboratory drug susceptibility testing of
Mycobacterium tuberculosis by radiometric procedure and two conventional methods. J Clin
Microbiol. 1985;22:919-923.
10
Takahashi H, Foster V. Detection and recovery of mycobacteria by a radiometric procedure. J
Clin Microbiol. 1983;17:380-381.
11
Siddiqi SH, Libonati JP, Carter ME, et al. Enhancement of mycobacterial growth in
middlebrook 7H12 medium by polyoxyethylene stearate. Current Microbiol. 1988;17:105-110.
12
Siddiqi SH, Laszlo A, Butler WR, et al. Bacteriological investigation of unusual mycobacteria
isolated from immuno-compromised patients. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1993;6:321-323.
13
Tenover FC, Crawford JT, Huebner RE, et al. The resurgence of tuberculosis: is your
laboratory ready? J Clin Microbiol. 1993;31:767-770.

MGITTM Procedure Manual


Section IV: References

14
Bird BR, Denniston MM, Huebner RE, et al. Changing practices in mycobacteriology: a
follow-up survey of State & Territorial Public Health Laboratories. J Clin Microbiol.
1996;34:554-559.
15
Siddiqi SH, Hwangbo CC. A new antimicrobial mixture (polymixin B, amphotericin B,
naildixic acid, trimethoprim and azlocillin) for effective suppression of non-mycobacterial
contamination during primary isolation of mycobacteria. 1986; ASM Annual Meeting,
Washington, DC. Abstract U35.
16
Abe CK, Hirano K, Wada M, et al. Comparison of the newly developed MB redox system
with Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT) and 2% Ogawa egg media for recovery of
mycobacteria in clinical specimens. Kekkaku (Japanese). 1999;74:707-713.
17
Apers L, Mutsvangwa J, Magwenzi J, et al. A comparison of direct microscopy, the
concentration method and the Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube for the examination of
sputum for acid-fast bacilli. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2003;7:376-381.
18
Chien HP, Yu MC, Wu MH, et al. Comparison of the BACTEC MGIT 960 with Lowenstein-
Jensen medium for recovery of mycobacteria from clinical specimens. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis.
2000;4:866-870.
19
Goloubeva V, Lecocq M, Lassowsky P, et al. Evaluation of mycobacteria growth indicator
tube for direct and indirect drug susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from
respiratory specimens in a Siberian prison hospital.
J Clin Microbiol. 2001;39:1501-1505.
20
Idigoras P, Beristain X, Iturzaeta A, et al. Comparison of the automated nonradiometric
BACTEC MGIT 960 system with Lowenstein-Jensen, Coletsos, and Middlebrook 7H11 solid
media for recovery of mycobacteria. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2000;19:350-354.
21
Jayakumar KV, Forster T, Kyi MS. Improved detection of Mycobacterium spp. using the
BACTEC MGIT 960 system. Br J Biomed Sci. 2001;58:54-158.
22
Lee JJ, Lin CB, Wang JD, et al. Comparative evaluation of the BACTEC MGIT 960 system
with solid medium for isolation of mycobacteria. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2003;7:569-574.
23
Macondo EA, Ba F, Toure-Kane NC, et al. Improvement of tuberculosis diagnosis by the
Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT) in a developing country laboratory. Bull Soc
Pathol Exot (French). 2000;93:97-100.
24
Samra Z, Kaufman L, Bechor J, et al. Comparative study of three culture systems for optimal
recovery of mycobacteria from different clinical specimens. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis.
2000;19:750-754.

MGIT Procedure Manual


Section IV: References

25
Somoskovi A, Kodmon C, Lantos A, et al. Comparison of recoveries of Mycobacterium
tuberculosis using the automated BACTEC 960 system, the BACTEC 460 TB system and
Lowenstein-Jensen medium. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38:2395-2397.
26
Zaruba R, Kralova M. Evaluation of the effectiveness of the BACTEC MGIT automatic
system for culture of mycobacteria in comparison with classical methods of culture. Epidemiol
Microbiol Immunol. 2002;51:66-70.
27
Ardito F, Sanguinetti M, Posteraro B, et al. Comparison of the mycobacteria growth indicator
tube with radiometric and solid culture for isolation of mycobacteria from clinical specimens and
susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. New Microbiol. 2000;23:151-158.
28
Badak FZ, Kiska DL, Setterquist S, et al. Comparison of Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube
with BACTEC®460 for detection and recovery of Mycobacteria from clinical specimens. J Clin
Microbiol. 1996;34:2236-2239.
29
Flanagan PG, Williams R, Paull A. Comparison of two automated systems for the isolation of
mycobacteria from clinical specimen. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1999;18:912-914.
30
Hanna BA, Ebrahimzadeh A, Elliott LB, et al. Multicenter evaluation of the BACTEC MGIT
960 system for recovery of mycobacteria. J Clin Microbiol. 1999;37:748-752.
31
Kanchana MV, Cheke D, Natyshak I, et al. Evaluation of the BACTEC MGIT 960 system for
the recovery of mycobacteria. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2000;37:31-36.
32
Leitritz L, Schubert S, Bucherl B, et al. Evaluation of BACTEC MGIT 960 and BACTEC
460TB systems for recovery of mycobacteria from clinical specimens of a university hospital
with low incidence of tuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2001;39:3764-3767.
33
Palaci M, Ueki SY, Sato DN, et al. Evaluation of Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube for
recovery and drug susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from respiratory
specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 1996;34:762-764.
34
Pinheiro MD, Ribeiro MM. Comparison of the BACTEC 460TB system and the BACTEC
MGIT 960 system in recovery of mycobacteria from clinical specimens. Clin Microbiol Infect.
2000;6:171-173.
35
Rohner P, Ninet B, Benri AM,et al. Evaluation of the BACTEC 960 automated non-
radiometric system for isolation of mycobacteria from clinical specimens. Eur J Clin Microbiol
Infect Dis. 2000;19:715-717.
36
Scarparo C, Piccoli P, Rigon A, et al. Evaluation of the BACTEC MGIT 960 in Comparison
with BACTEC 460TB for detection and recovery of Mycobacteria from clinical specimens.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2002;44:157-161.

MGIT Procedure Manual


Section IV: References

37
Tortoli E, Cichero P, Piersimoni C, et al. Use of BACTEC MGIT 960 for recovery of
mycobacteria from clinical specimens: Multi-Center study. J Clin Microbiol. 1999;37:3578-
3582.
38
Tsuyuguchi K, Ikeda T, Nakatani K, et al. Evaluation of the Mycobacteria Growth Indicator
Tube system for detection and quantification of mycobacteria from clinical specimens. Kekkaku
(Japanese). 2003;78:389-393.
39
Whyte T, Cormican M, Hanahoe B, et al. Comparison of BACTEC MGIT 960 and BACTEC
460 for culture of Mycobacteria. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2000;38:123-126.
40
Witebsky FG, Keiser JF, Conville PS, et al. Comparison of BACTEC 13A medium and Du
Pont Isolator for detection of mycobacteria. J Clin Microbiol. 1988;26:1501-1505.
41
Abe C, Aono A, Hirano K. Evaluation of the BACTEC MGIT 960 system for drug
susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates compared with the proportion
method on solid media. Kekkaku (Japanese). 2001;76:657-662.
42
Ardito F, Posteraro B, Sanguinetti M, et al. Evaluation of BACTEC Mycobacteria Growth
Indicator Tube (MGIT 960) automated system for drug susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium
tuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2001;39:4440-4444.
43
Adjers-Koskela K, Katila ML. Susceptibility testing with the manual Mycobacteria Growth
Indicator Tube MGIT) and the MGIT 960 System provides rapid and reliable verification of
multidrug resistant tuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41:1235-1239.
44
Bemer P, Palicova F, Rusch-Gerdes S, et al. Multi-center evaluation of fully automated
BACTEC Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube 960 system for susceptibility testing of
Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2002;40:150-154.
45
Bergmann JS, Fish G, Woods GL. Evaluation of BBL MGIT (Mycobacteria Growth Indicator
Tube) AST SIRE System for antimycobacterial susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium
tuberculosis to 4 primary anti-tuberculosis drugs. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2000;124:82-86.
46
Bergmann JS, Woods GL. Reliability of mycobacteria growth indicator tube for testing
susceptibility of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to ethambutol and streptomycin. J Clin Microbiol.
1997;35:3325-3327.
47
Bergmann JS, Woods GL. Mycobacterial growth indicator tube for susceptibility testing of
Mycobacterium tuberculosis to isoniazid and rifampin. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis.
1997;28:153-156.
48
Cambau E, Truffot-Pernot C, Boulahbal F, et al. Mycobacterial Growth Indicator Tube versus
the proportion method on Lowenstein-Jensen medium for antibiotic susceptibility testing of
Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2000;19:938-942.

MGIT Procedure Manual


Section IV: References

49
Huang TS, Tu HZ, Lee SS, et al. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium
tuberculosis to first-line drugs: comparisons of the MGIT 960 and BACTEC 460 Systems. Ann
Clin Lab Sci. 2002;32:142-147.
50
Reisner BS, Gatson AM, Woods GL. Evaluation of Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tubes for
susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to isoniazid and rifampin. Diagn Microbiol
Infect Dis. 1995;22:325-329.
51
Tortoli E, Benedetti M, Fontanelli A, et al. Evaluation of automated BACTEC MGIT 960
system for testing susceptibility of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to four major anti-tuberculous
drugs: comparison with the radiometric BACTEC 460TB method and the agar plate method of
proportion. J Clin Microbiol. 2002;40:607-610.
52
Walters SB, Hanna BA. Testing of susceptibility of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to isoniazid
and rifampin by Mycobacterium Growth Indicator Tube method. J Clin Microbiol.
1996;34:1565-1567.
53
Aono A, Hirano K, Hamasaki S, et al. Evaluation of BACTEC MGIT 960 medium for
susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to pyrazinamide (PZA): compared with the
results of pyrazinamidase assay and Kyokuto PZA test. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis.
2002;44:347-352.
54
Pfyffer GE, Palicova F, Rusch-Gerdes S. Testing of susceptibility of Mycobacterium
tuberculosis to pyrazinamide with the non-radiometric BACTEC MGIT 960 system. J Clin
Microbiol. 2002;40:1670-1674.
55
Bastian I, Rigouts L, Palomino JC, et al. Kanamycin susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium
tuberculosis using Mycobacterium Growth Indicator Tube and a colorimetric method.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2001;45:1934-1936.
56
Piersimoni C, Nista D, Bornigia S, et al. Evaluation of new method for rapid drug
susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium avium complex isolates by using the Mycobacteria
Growth Indicator Tube. J Clin Microbiol. 1998;36:64-67.
57
Alcaide F, Benitez MA, Escriba JM, et al. Evaluation of the BACTEC MGIT 960 and the
MB/BacT systems for recovery of mycobacteria from clinical specimens and for species
identification by DNA AccuProbe. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38:398-401.
58
Katila ML, Katila P, Erkinjuntti-Pekkanen R. Accelerated detection and identification of
mycobacteria with MGIT 960 and COBAS AMPLICOR systems. J Clin Microbiol.
2000;38:960-964.
59
Williams-Bouyer N, Yorke R, Lee HI, et al. Comparison of the BACTEC MGIT 960 and ESP
Culture System II for growth and detection of Mycobacteria. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38:4167-
4170.

MGIT Procedure Manual


Section IV: References

60
Yan JJ, Huang AH, Tsai SH, et al. Comparison of the MB/BacT and BACTEC MGIT 960
system for recovery of mycobacteria from clinical specimens. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis.
2000;37:25-30.
61
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Institutes of Health. Biosafety in
microbiological and biomedical laboratories. HHS Publication No. (CDC) 99-8395. US
Government Printing Office. Washington, 1999. Also available at
[Link]/od/ohs/biosfty/bmbl4/[Link].
62
Kent PT, Kubica GP. The sputum digestion process in mycobacteriology: centrifugation
efficacy and digestant toxicity. Annual Meeting of American Society for Microbiology, St.
Louis, MO 1984. Abstract U2.
63
Fadda G, Roe SL. Recovery and susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from
extra pulmonary specimens by the BACTEC radiometric method. J Clin Microbiol.
1984;19:720-721.
64
Harris G, Rayner A, Blair J, et al. Comparison of three isolation systems for the culture of
mycobacteria from respiratory and non-respiratory samples. J Clin Pathol. 2000;53:615-618.
65
Hanna BA, Walters SB, Bonk SJ, et al. Recovery of mycobacteria from blood in
Mycobacteria Indicator Tube and Lowenstein-Jensen slant after lysis-centrifugation. J Clin
Microbiol. 1995;33:3315-3316.
66
Lu D, Heeren B, Dunne WM. Comparison of the Automated Mycobacteria Growth Indicator
Tube System (BACTEC 960/MGIT) with Lowenstein-Jensen medium for recovery of
mycobacteria from clinical specimens. Am J Clin Pathol. 2002;118:542-545.
67
Tu HZ, Chang SH, Huaug TS, et al. Microscopic morphology in smears prepared from MGIT
broth medium for rapid presumptive identification Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex,
Mycobacterium avium complex and Mycobacterium kansasii. Ann Clin Lab Sci. 2003;33:179-
183.
68
Banaiee N, Bobadilla-del-Valle M, Riska PF, et al. Rapid identification and susceptibility
testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from MGIT cultures with luciferase reporter
mycobacteriophages. J Med Microbiol. 2003;52:557-561.
69
Kontos F, Petinaki E, Nicolaou S, et al. Multicenter evaluation of the fully automated
BACTEC MGIT 960 system and three molecular methods for the isolation and the identification
of mycobacteria from clinical specimens. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2003;46:299-301.
70
Kontos F, Petinaki E, Gitti Z, et al. Combined use of the fully automated BACTEC MGIT 960
System and a PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis for routine detection and
identification of mycobacteria from clinical samples. J Microbiol Methods. 2003;52:137-140.

MGIT Procedure Manual


Section IV: References

71
Hasegawa N, Miura T, Yamaguchi K, et al. New simple and rapid test for culture
confirmation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex: a multi-center study. J Clin Microbiol.
2002;40:908-912.
72
Levidiotou S, Papamichael D, Gessouli E, et al. Detection of mycobacteria in clinical
specimens using the mycobacteria growth indicator tube (MGIT) and the Lowenstein-Jensen
medium. Microbiol Res. 1999;154:151-155.
73
TDR TB Website : [Link]
74
CLSI Website : [Link]
75
Kruuner A, Yates MD, Drobniewski FA. Evaluation of MGIT 960-based antimicrobial testing
and determination of critical concentrations of first- and second-line antimicrobial drugs with
drug-resistant clinical strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44:811-
818.
76
Rusch-Gerdes S, Pfyffer GE, Casal M, et al. Multi-center laboratory validation of the
BACTEC MGIT 960 technique for testing susceptibilities of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to
classical second-line drugs and newer antimicrobials. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44:688-692.

MGIT Procedure Manual

You might also like