Refractive Index: Density, Temperature, Wavelength
Refractive Index: Density, Temperature, Wavelength
B (2021) 94 :139
[Link]
THE EUROPEAN
PHYSICAL JOURNAL B
Regular Article - Solid State and Materials
Bowei Geophysics Ltd., Xiangtan National High-Tech Center, 411104 Xiangtan, Hunan, People’s Republic of China
Received 6 May 2021 / Accepted 22 June 2021 / Published online 9 July 2021
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to EDP Sciences, SIF and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany,
part of Springer Nature 2021
Abstract. The refractive index of dielectrics is a function of the density, temperature, and the wavelength
of the incident light. The refractive index and material dispersion are determined by the plasma and the
resonance frequencies. Physically, the forced oscillation of an induced dipole is driven by the light wave,
vibrating in the plane perpendicular to the propagation direction of light. The incident light is absorbed at
the resonance frequency. In this case, the induced dipole is transformed into independent neutral oscillator
(atom). Yet, the forced oscillation of the dipole and the thermal motion of the atom have different vibration
modes. Each mode carries out thermal energy. The incident light should overcome the thermal energy to
excite the vibration modes of the dipoles. These features lead to the temperature-dependent plasma and
resonance frequencies, and consequently yield the temperature-dependent refractive index and material
dispersion. Moreover, the change of refractive index with temperature is found to relate with specific heat
capacity. The proposed approach is applied for analyzing the refractive index of silica glass.
a
e-mail: bowei geophysics@[Link] (corresponding
author)
123
139 Page 2 of 9 Eur. Phys. J. B (2021) 94 :139
123
Eur. Phys. J. B (2021) 94 :139 Page 3 of 9 139
123
139 Page 4 of 9 Eur. Phys. J. B (2021) 94 :139
Table 1 The intercept a and the slope b evaluated by plotting (n2 - 1)−1 versus λ−2 at wavelengths in ultraviolet and
visible regions for silica glass: (n2 - 1)−1 = a + bλ−2
with respect to temperature, and combining hvpT = All terms of n, dn/dT, Cv , a, and b in Eq. (16) are
hvp0 − 4E, and hvT = hv0 − 6E, one obtains measurable quantities. It is interesting to find that one
is able to calculate a product, NA hc, of the fundamental
constants.
n dn 2 3vT 2 dE
= − 2 . (14) Only part of the vibration modes is active at low
(n2 − 1)2 dT hvpT vpT n −1 dT temperatures. However, all modes are excited at high
temperatures. According to the Dulong–Petit law, the
Equation (14) is a relationship connecting the opti- molar heat capacity approaches 3zN A kB , or 3zR with
cal and thermal properties. Assume that all oscillators increasing temperature, where R is the gas constant.
vibrate at the frequency vosc . The molar thermal energy Under this circumstance, the number of mode has the
is equal to qN A E, and the molar heat capacity Cv maximum value, 3z.
at constant volume is defined as Cv = qNA (dE /dT ),
where NA is the Avogadro constant, and q is the
number of vibration modes per molecule. Suppose the
molecule is composed of z atoms. The maximum num- 5 Refractive index and material dispersion
ber of vibrtion mode per molecule is given by qmax =
3z. Equation (14) then leads to a relationship connect-
of densified silica glass
ing n, dn/dT, and molar heat capacity Cv , which reads
as The refractive index of silica glass has been precisely
determined in a wide frequency range at different tem-
peratures and pressures (or densities) [1–4,9,10,17–20].
n dn 2 3vT 2
2 2
= − 2 Cv . Silica glass can be permanently densified by different
(n − 1) dT qNA hvpT vpT n −1
means, as for example by high pressure [9,20–23], by
(15) fast neutron irradiation [24,25], and oxidation of Si at
low temperature [26]. It has been experimentally veri-
Equation (15) is independent of the wavelength, being fied that the impurities in silica glass, such as chlorine
valid for all indices of refraction in the UV and VIS and hydroxyl impurities, also affect the refractive index
regions. The change of refractive index with tem- and density [27,28].
perature is related to specific heat capacity. Notice The indices of refraction for silica glasses of differ-
lim Cv = 0. One has lim (dn/dT ) = 0. Alternatively, ent densities (from 2.2003 to 2.2173 g/cm3 ) have been
T →0 T →0 determined by Kitamura et al. in terms of the glass
Eq. (15) can be expressed in terms of a and b given by prisms, which were densified by means of the hot iso-
Eqs. (6) and (7) static pressing (HIP) method [20]. The refractive index
√ was measured at room temperature. Figure 1 shows the
n dn 2 −b √ 2 plots of (n2 –1)−1 versus λ−2 at wavelengths in the UV
= 3 a− 2 Cv . (16)
(n2 − 1)2 dT qNA hc n −1 and VIS regions. As depicted by Eq. (5), the straight
123
Eur. Phys. J. B (2021) 94 :139 Page 5 of 9 139
Fig. 2 Plot of log(hv pT ) versus log(ρ) for silica glass (open Fig. 4 Plots of (n2 –1)−1 versus λ−2 for silica glass at rep-
circle) and for the ordinary wave (o-ray) in α-quartz (solid resentative temperatures. The indices of refraction at 107.8
square). The quantum energy hv pT for both glass and the and 356.5 K are taken from Ref. [19], and 744 and 1101 K
crystal obeys the same relationship are from Ref. [17]
123
139 Page 6 of 9 Eur. Phys. J. B (2021) 94 :139
Fig. 5 The evaluated results of hv pT , and hv T at different temperatures. The temperature-dependent hv T , hv pT , and hv pT
– hv T are shown in Fig. 5a, b, c, respectively. The symbols (solid squares) represent the evaluated values, and the lines
shown in Fig. 5a, b, c denote the fitting results by Eqs. (10), (11), and (12), respectively. The experimental relationship
between hv T and hv pT is shown in Fig. 5d. Note that there is a systematic variance between two sets of experimental data.
The open circles are the data from Ref. [17], and solid squares are from [19]. The mean results for two linear relations are
in agreement with Eq. (13)
plasma frequency. Substituting Eq. (18) and the mean atic difference between two data sets of the refractive
value (2.15249×10−18 J) of hv T into Eq. (5), one is able index determined by Wray and Neu at high tempera-
to calculate the density-dependent refractive index at tures [17], and by Matsuoka et al. at low temperatures
λ = 0.5893µm. The calculated result is also plotted in [19]. The temperature-dependent hv T , hv pT , and hv pT
Fig. 3. The theoretical result is in well agreement with – hv T are shown in Fig. 5a, b, and c, which are found
the experimental data. to obey Eqs. (10), (11), and (12), respectively. The fit-
ting results are also plotted in Fig. 5. The evaluated
value [9.9546(28) × 10−20 J] of hv p0 – hv 0 is equal to
a difference between hv p0 [2.27912(72) × 10−18 J] and
6 Temperature-dependent refractive index hv 0 [2.18366(69) × 10−18 J], obtained from Eqs. (11)
and material dispersion of silica glass and (10), respectively. The values of hv osc calculated
from Eqs. (10) and (11) are 6.72(54) × 10−21 J and
The indices of refraction of the prisms composed of 6.37(81) × 10−21 J, with the mean value of 6.55 × 10−21
silica glass have been precisely determined by the J. According to the argument of Einstein and Debye
minimum-deviation method with a spectrometer in a [14], the oscillation frequency vosc can be alternatively
wide wavelength range, and at temperatures from 108 expressed by a characteristic temperature θ, that is
to 1101 K [17,19]. These results provide reliable data for kB θ = hvosc , or θ = hvosc /kB . The evaluated value
analyzing the temperature-dependent refractive index for θ is 474 K.
and material dispersion. At different temperatures, the experimental relation-
For the representative temperatures, the plots of (n2 – ship between hv T and hv pT is shown in Fig. 5d. A lin-
1) versus λ−2 are shown in Fig. 4 at wavelengths in
−1 ear relation in found for two sets of the experimental
the UV and VIS regions. As depicted by Eq. (5), the lin- data. As described by Eq. (13), the mean slope (1.474)
ear relation between (n2 –1)−1 and λ−2 is demonstrated and the mean intercept (−1.174 × 10−18 J) are approx-
at a constant temperature. The evaluated a, b, hv pT , imately equal to the theoretical values of 3/2, and hv 0 –
and hv T are listed in Table 1. Note there is a system- 3hvp0 /2(−1.235 × 10−18 J), respectively.
123
Eur. Phys. J. B (2021) 94 :139 Page 7 of 9 139
Fig. 6 The molar heat capacity for silica glass. The lines √ √
are the experimental data: solid line Ref. [29], dash dot line Fig. 8 Plot of 2 −b 3 a − 2(n2 − 1)−1 Cp versus
Ref. [30], and dash line Ref. [31]. The symbols denote the n(n2 − 1)−2 dn/dT for silica glass. The open circles are the
results calculated by means of Eq. (15). The solid squares experimental results. The indices of refraction are taken
represent the results with q = 7 between 107.8 and 356.5 K. from Ref. [19], and the molar heat capacities are obtained
The indices of refraction are taken from Ref. [19]. The open by polynomial interpolation of the experimental data from
circles at 744 and 1101 K are the results with q = 8, and q = Ref. [29]. The ratio of the two terms is equal to the slope of
9, respectively. The indices of refraction are from Ref. [17] the straight line, 0.8355(22) (J m mol−1 ), and is equivalent
to 7NA hc
123
139 Page 8 of 9 Eur. Phys. J. B (2021) 94 :139
Fig. 9 Plots of (n2 –1)−1 versus λ−2 in the UV-to-IR range for silica glass at different temperatures (a). Notice the deviation
from the linear relation in the IR region. The difference of the refractive index, n(λ, T )- n(λ, T0 ), at temperatures T and
T0 is shown in (b). The experimental data (symbols) are taken from Ref. [17]. The curves represent the theoretical results
calculated by Eq. (19)
of Eq. (14). Both experimental [17,18] and theoreti- cific heat capacity. The proposed approach is confirmed
cal results for dn/dT (at λ = 0.5876µm) are shown in by the refractive index of silica glass.
Fig. 7. Notice lim Cv = 0. One finds lim (dn/dT ) = 0. In this work, we focus our attention on discussion of
T →0 T →0
Finally, in terms of the determined n, Cp , dn/dT, the refractive index and material dispersion in the UV
a, and b, one is able to calculate the product, NA hc, and VIS regions. At infrared (IR) frequencies, there are
of the fundamental two parts of polarization in dielectrics in response to the
√ √constants by means of Eq. (16). In
electric field of the incident light, namely the electronic
a plot of 2 −b 3 a − 2(n2 − 1)−1 Cp versus n(n2 − polarization and the ionic polarization [11,16,35–38]. A
1)−2 dn/dT at different wavelengths, and at tempera- relative phase difference between two parts of polariza-
tures between 107.8 and 356.5 K, a linear relationship tion is π [10]. They tend to cancel one another. How-
is demonstrated, as the result shown in Fig. 8. This ever, ionic polarization is unable to respond to elec-
relation is independent of the wavelength and temper- tromagnetic waves at frequencies in the UV and VIS
ature. The slope of the line, 0.8355(22) (J m mol−1 ), regions. In the plot of (n2 − 1)−1 versus λ−2 , the devia-
is equal to 7NA hc. The evaluated NA hc is 0.11935(32) tion from the linear relation is observed in the IR range,
(J m mol−1 ). This result is amazingly in well agree- as the result shown in Fig. 9a for silica glass. In a wide
ment with classical value for NA hc, 0.11962656(29) (J range from UV to IR, the difference of the refractive
m mol−1 ) [34], giving a firm support for the present index, n(λ, T ) − n(λ, T0 ), at temperatures T and T0 is
work. shown in Fig. 9b. The experimental data (symbols) are
taken from Ref. [17]. The difference n(λ, T ) − n(λ, T0 )
approaches a constant with increasing wavelength at a
given temperature. According to Eq. (5), the value for
8 Discussion n(λ, T ) − n(λ, T0 ) is given by
123
Eur. Phys. J. B (2021) 94 :139 Page 9 of 9 139
between the experimental and theoretical observations 9. C.Z. Tan, J. Arndt, H.S. Xie, Physica B 252, 28 (1998)
in a wide wavelength range. Although the refractive 10. C. Z. Tan, J. Arndt, The refractive index of silica glass
index deviates from Eq. (5) in the IR range, the dif- and its dependence on pressure, temperature, and the
ference, n(λ, T ) - n(λ, T0 ), is found to satisfy Eq. (19). wavelength of the incident light, in Silicon-Based Mate-
Notice the refractive index and material dispersion rials and Devices, Vol. 2, chap. 2, edited by H. S. Nalwa
described by Eq. (5) is related to electronic polariza- (Academic Press, New York, 2001)
tion. The results shown in Fig. 9 imply that the partial 11. J.D. Jackson, Classical electrodynamics (Wiley, New
polarizability for ionic polarization is almost indepen- York, 1999)
dent of temperature. 12. C.Z. Tan, Optik 168, 864 (2018)
Numerous optical effects, such as the change of 13. C. Kittel, Thermal physics (Wiley, New York, 1969)
14. C. Kittel, Introduction to solid state physics (Wiley,
refractive index with temperature, optical activity, and
New York, 1996)
the Faraday effect, are only associated with electronic
15. B.H. Bransden, C.J. Joachain, Introduction to quantum
polarization [35–37]. While many optical phenomena mechanics (Wiley, New York, 1989)
are observed in the IR region, as for example, piezo- 16. M. Born, E. Wolf, Principles of optics (Pergamon Press,
electric lattice vibrations [38], self-modulation of the Oxford, 1984)
polarized light in anisotropic crystals [39,40], Zeeman 17. J.H. Wray, J.T. Neu, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 59, 774 (1969)
effect in α-quartz [41], strain effect on circularly polar- 18. R.M. Waxler, G.W. Cleek, J. Res. Natl. Bur. Stand. A
ized electroluminescence in transition metal dichalco- 75, 279 (1971)
genides [42], and Raman scattering in iron supercon- 19. J. Matsuoka, N. Kitamura, S. Fujinaga, T. Kitaoka, H.
ductors [43]. Yamashita, J. Non-Cryst, Solids 135, 86 (1991)
The proposed approach is applicable to study the 20. N. Kitamura, Y. Toguchi, S. Funo, H. Yamashita, M.
refractive index for both isotropic and anisotropic Kinoshita, J. Non-Cryst, Solids 159, 241 (1993)
media. Light propagating in glasses and cubic crystals 21. P.W. Bridgmann, I. Simon, J. Appl. Phys. 24, 405
has unique index of refraction. For anisotropic crystals, (1953)
this approach can be used for exploring the principal 22. J.D. Mackenzie, J. Am Ceram. Soc. 46, 461 (1963)
indices of refraction. The refractive index of anisotropic 23. J. Arndt, D. Stöffler, Phys. Chem. Glasses 10, 117
crystals depends on the propagation and polarization (1969)
directions of light [16,44,45]. 24. W. Primak, Phys. Rev. 110, 1240 (1968)
25. V.N. Bogdanov, I.M. Brovchenko, L.V. Maksimov, A.R.
Silin, O.V. Yanush, Phys. Stat. Sol. (a) 119, 621 (1990)
26. L.M. Landsberger, W.A. Tiller, Appl. Phys. Lett. 51,
9 Conclusions 1416 (1987)
27. H. Kakiuchida, N. Shimodaira, E.H. Sekiya, K. Saito,
The refractive index and material dispersion are deter- A.J. Ikushima, Appl. Phys. Lett. 86, 161907 (2005)
28. N. Kitamura, K. Fukumi, J. Nishii, J. Appl. Phys. 101,
mined by the plasma and the resonance frequencies,
123533 (2007)
which depend on temperature. The plasma frequency
29. O. Davronov, G.A. Berzovsky, J. Thermal. Anal. 33,
is proportional to the square root of the density. 749 (1988)
These features lead to the density- and temperature- 30. R.C. Lord, J.C. Morrow, J. Chem. Phys. 26, 230 (1957)
dependent refractive index. The change of refractive 31. N.P. Bansal, R.H. Doremus, Handbook of Glass Proper-
index with temperature is related with the specific heat ties (Academic Press Inc, New York, 1986)
capacity. The validity of the proposed approach is con- 32. L.E. Reichl, A modern course in statistic physics (The
firmed by the refractive index of silica glass. University of Texas Press, Austin, 1980)
33. R.C. Zeller, R.O. Pohl, Phys. Rev. B 4, 2029 (1971)
Data Availability Statement This manuscript has asso- 34. P.J. Mohr, D.B. Newell, B.N. Taylor, J. Phys. Chem.
ciated data in a data repository. [Authors’ comment: All Ref. Data 45, 043102 (2016)
dada analysed during this study are included in this pub- 35. C.Z. Tan, L. Chen, Opt. Lett. 32, 2936 (2007)
lished article and the cited references.] 36. C.Z. Tan, Opt. Express 16, 14675 (2008)
37. C.Z. Tan, J. Phys. A 43, 354007 (2010)
38. C.Z. Tan, Solid State Commun. 131, 405 (2004)
References 39. C.Z. Tan, T.B. Wang, H. Chen, Z.G. Liu, Opt. Lett. 28,
1466 (2003)
1. I.H. Malitson, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 55, 1205 (1965) 40. C.Z. Tan, C. Yan, Phys. Lett. A 360, 742 (2007)
2. C.Z. Tan, J. Non-Cryst, Solids 223, 158 (1998) 41. C.Z. Tan, Physica B 404, 2229 (2009)
3. C.Z. Tan, J. Non-Cryst, Solids 238, 30 (1998) 42. S. Wang, M. Ukhtary, R. Saito, Phys. Rev. Res. 2,
4. C.Z. Tan, J. Arndt, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 62, 1087 033340 (2020)
(2001) 43. C. Setty, J. Hu, Phys. Rev. B 89, 180509(R) (2014)
5. C.Z. Tan, J. Arndt, Physica B 229, 217 (1997) 44. C.Z. Tan, Optik 127, 3660 (2016)
6. C.Z. Tan, Physica B 269, 373 (1999) 45. C.Z. Tan, Optik 134, 280 (2017)
7. L. Prod’homme, Phys. Chem. Glasses 1, 119 (1960)
8. C. Z. Tan, J. Arndt, Physica B 233, Nos. 2&3 addendum
(1997)
123