Control Charts and Process Capability Analysis
Control Charts and Process Capability Analysis
PRODUCTION ENGINEERING
1. Mention the Shewhart variation charts. What else are they called?
They are the common and special causes also referred to as natural variation and assignable.
It is said that a process operates under statistical control when its only source of variation...
consists of common causes (natural).
• The graphs x: Indicate whether changes have occurred in the central tendency of a process.
• The graphs R: Indicate that there has been gain or loss in the dispersion (variability
of the process).
State of a process in which the statistical measurement being evaluated is not under
statistical control, that is, the variations between the results of the samples are
affected by assignable causes.
5. Enliste los cinco pasos a seguir en el desarrollo y uso de gráficasx́ and R graphics.
2) Calculate the global averages and set the appropriate control limits.
usually at the 99.73% level, and calculate the upper control limits and
Inferior preliminaries. See table S6.2 for other control limits.
If the process is not stable at present, use the desired mean, μ, instead of
to calculate the limits.
3) Plot the means and ranges of the samples in their respective graphs of
control and determine if they fall outside the acceptable limits.
4) Investigate the points or patterns that indicate that the process is out of control.
Try to assign the causes of the variation, confront them, and then resume the
process.
5) Collect additional samples and, if necessary, revalidate the control limits
with the new data.
7. Explain why it is easier for a person to find samples "outside the limits" if
Use the 2 sigma control charts with the 3 sigma control charts. What are they?
What are some possible consequences of this fact?
The 2 sigma control charts cover only 95.5% of all natural variation; still
In the absence of an assignable cause, the points will fall outside the 4.5% control limit.
the times.
X́
8. When is the desired mean, µ, used instead of to establish the central line of a
control chart?
The desired mean is used when the mean of a process being observed is
unknown or out of control or when there is an established or known one, provided
by the manufacturer or designer of the equipment or process.
Yes, because it means that the process has changed and that this cannot be applied in the
future or in other products.
10. In a control chart, what would be the effect on the control limits if the size of
Does the sample vary from one sample to the next?
Control charts are designed for specific sample sizes due to the
The standard deviation of the sample or the range depends on the sample size. These
control charts, studied in this chapter, should not be used if the sizes of the
samples vary.
National Polytechnic School
Faculty of Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Production Engineering
ADM713
Quito, Ecuador
11. Defina Cpk y explique lo que significa un Cpk de 1.0. ¿Qué es la Cp?
It is the process capability index, a way to express the capability of the process.
The proportion of natural variation (3 σ) is measured between the center of the process and the limit of
closest specification. Cp is the process capability ratio and determines whether the
process meets the design specifications
12. What does a 5-point run above or below the central line in a graph imply?
of control?
What are the acceptable quality level (AQL) and the tolerated percentage of defects in the
lot (LTPD)? How are they used?
The AQL is the acceptable quality level. It is said to be the lowest quality level that is...
is willing to accept.
LTPD is the percentage of defects tolerated in the lot. That is, it is the quality level of
a lot considered bad.
Test used to examine the points recorded on a control chart and see if there are any
non-random variations.
15. Analyze the administrative aspects related to the use of control charts.
operating characteristic curve) describes how well it discriminates between good and bad lots.
bad an acceptance plan. A curve belongs to a specific plan, that is, to a
combination of n (sample size) and c (acceptance level). What is being attempted is
show the probability that the plan accepts batches with different quality levels.
Acceptance sampling has the purpose of determining a course of action (to accept or
reject) regarding the disposition of a lot without inspecting each item of a lot.
This parameter does not estimate the quality of a batch.
18. What are the two risks present when using acceptance sampling?
. The producer's risk (α): is the probability that a "good" lot is rejected.
This is the risk that a random sample may result in a
National Polytechnic School
Faculty of Electrical and Electronics Engineering
Production Engineering
ADM713
Quito, Ecuador
proportion of defects much greater than that of the population of all items. A
lot with an acceptable quality level AQL has a probability α of being
rejected. Sampling plans are often designed to establish the risk of
producer at α = .05, or 5 percent.
. Consumer risk (β): it is the probability that a 'bad' lot is accepted. This
it is the risk that a random sample may result in a proportion of
minor defects.
19. Is a capable process a perfect process? That is, can a capable process generate
only outputs that meet the specifications? Explain your answer.
A capable process is not a perfect process, but it does deliver results with very low variability.
tolerance. A capable process can produce outputs very close to perfection without
embargo when it comes to statistical processes, identical results are never expected
the expected in the specifications.
EXERCISES OF CHAPTER 6
S6.1 The boxes of Organic Flakes are produced to hold 14 ounces with a deviation
Standard of 0.1 ounce. Set up the graph.x́from 3 sigma for a sample size of
36 boxes.
σ 0.1
σ x́ = = =0.0167
√ n √36
LCSx́ =x́+zσx́ =14+3∗0.0167=14.05 ounces
Where:
x́=measure the sample means to the established target value by the process
n=sample size
1.72
LCSx́ =x́+ zσx́ =50+30
( )
√5
=50.307
1.72
LCIx́ =x́−gmisx́az=50−30
( )
√5
=47.692
S6.3 A total of 35 samples, each of size 7, were taken from a filling machine.
bags with fertilizer. The results were: global average = 57.75 lb; average range = 1.78
lb.
n=7
´ =57.75 lb
X́
Ŕ=1.78 lb
σ =3
A2=0,419 (Table S6.1)
LCSX́ =58,318lb
LCIX́ =56.824 lb
b) Determine the upper and lower control limits of the R chart, where σ = 3. PX
n=7
Ŕ=1.78lb
σ =3
D 3=0.076 (Table S6.1)
LCSX́ =3,425lb
´
LCIX́ =D 3R=0.076∗1.78 lb
National Polytechnic School
Faculty of Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Production Engineering
ADM713
Quito, Ecuador
LCIX́ =0.135lb
S6.4 Pioneer Chicken sells 'light' chicken with 30% fewer calories than standard chicken.
When the process for the 'light' chicken is under control, the average chicken breast
It contains 420 calories, and the standard deviation in the caloric content of the population of
Chicken breasts are 25 calories. Pioneer wants to design a graph to monitor the
caloric content of chicken breasts, where 25 should be randomly selected
Breasts to form each sample. What are the upper and lower control limits?
for this graph, if the limits are chosen to be four standard deviations from the goal?
n=25
Z=4
σ =25
X́ =420
´ +ZσX́
LCS= X
´
LCI=X−ZσX́
σ
σ X́ =
√n
4∗25
LCS=420+
( )
√ 25
LCS=440
4∗25
LCI=420−
( √ 25 )
LCI=400
A=0.308,
2 D=1.777
4 , D3=0.223
Forx́
LCSx́ =x+ ´
´ A 2R=705+0.308∗6=706.848
LCIx́ =x− ´
´ A2R=705−0.308∗6=703.152
National Polytechnic School
Faculty of Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Production Engineering
ADM713
Quito, Ecuador
For R
´
LCSR=D 4∗R=1.777∗6=10.662
´
LCIR=D 3∗R=0.223∗6=1.338
S6.6 The sampling of 4 pieces of wire with precise cut (for an assembly of
computers), which was conducted every hour for the last 24 hours, produced the
following results:
Develop the appropriate control charts and determine if there is any cause of
concern in the cutting process. Graph the information and look for patterns.
´ A 2R´
LCSx́ =x+
´ A2R´
LCIx́ =x−
Where:
x́=sample means
LCSx́ =x+ ´
´ A 2 R=2,982+ 0,729 (1,024 =3.7284
)
LCIx́ =x− ´
´ A2R=2,982−0,729 1,024
( =2.2355
)
National Polytechnic School
Faculty of Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Production Engineering
ADM713
Quito, Ecuador
LCSR=D 4R´
LCIR=D 3R´
Where:
´
LCSR=D 4R=2,282 1,024
( =2.3368
)
´ 0( 1,024=0
LCIR=D 3R= )( )
National Polytechnic School
Faculty of Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Production Engineering
ADM713
Quito, Ecuador
S6.7 In the Yongpin Zhou plant in Shanghai, pistons for automobiles are produced in a
forging process, and the diameter is a critical factor that must be controlled. From
samples of 10 pistons produced daily, the mean and the range of their diameter have
the following:
Build the X 3 sigma chart and an R 3 sigma chart for this dimension, use the
data observed in the previous table.
Graph X
n=5
σ =3
A2=0.577 (Table S6.1)
LCSX́ =157,745mm
LCIX́ =152.575mm
Graphic X
10.01
10.01
10
10
10
10
10
9.99
9.99
9.99
9.99
1 2 3 4 5
Graphic R
n=5
Ŕ=4.48mm
σ =3
D 3=0 (Table S6.1)
LCSŔ=9.4707mm
´
LCIR=D 3R=0∗4.48mm
LCIŔ =0mm
Graphic R
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
1 2 3 4 5
S6.8 Bill Kime's bowling ball factory only produces balls with weight and size for
adults. It is known that the standard deviation in the weight of a bowling ball produced in
the factory is 0.12 pounds. Daily, for 24 days, the average weight has been evaluated.
in pounds of nine bowling balls produced that day, the results are presented in the
next table:
X́ =16
National Polytechnic School
Faculty of Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Production Engineering
ADM713
Quito, Ecuador
´ +ZσX́
LCS= X
´
LCI=X−ZσX́
σ
σ X́ =
√n
2∗0.12
LCS=16+
( √9 )
LCS=16.08
2∗0.12
LCI=16−
( √9 )
LCI=15.92
Chart Title
16.4
16.2
16
15.8
15.6
15.4
15.2
15
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
S6.9 Whole Grains LLC applies statistical process control to ensure that its parts of
multigrain bread for sandwiches, low in fat and healthy, have the appropriate weight. With
Based on a stable and controlled process, the limits for the graphs are known.x́and R are:
LCSx́= 6.56, LCI x́= 5.84, LCSR = 1.141, =LCI
0. RDuring the last few days, 5 were taken
random samples of four pieces each were taken and the following was found:
Net weight
Show Piece#3
a Piece#1 Piece#2 Part#4
1 6.3 6.0 5.9 5.9
2 6.0 6.0 6.3 5.9
3 6.3 4.8 5.6 5.2
4 6.2 6.0 6.2 5.9
5 6.5 6.6 6.5 6.9
Sample 1 2 3 4 5
Piece#1 6.3 6 6.3 6.2 6.5
Piece#2 6 6 4.8 6 6.6
Piece#3 5.9 6.3 5.6 6.2 6.5
Part#4 5.9 5.9 5.2 5.9 6.9
Media 6.03 6.05 5.48 6.08 6.63
Range 0.4 0.4 1.5 0.3 0.4
National Polytechnic School
Faculty of Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Production Engineering
ADM713
Quito, Ecuador
GRAPH X
7
SAMPLES
4 LCS
LCI
3
0
1 2 3 4 5
GRAPH R
1.6
1.4
1.2
1 Range
LCS
0.8 LCI
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
1 2 3 4 5
6.10 A process that is considered under control measures an ingredient in ounces. The table
The following contains the data from the last 10 samples taken (each of size n=5).
The population standard deviation is 1.36.
National Polytechnic School
Faculty of Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Production Engineering
ADM713
Quito, Ecuador
a) What is the standard deviation σ of the process? What value does it have?
σ1,36
σ x́ = = =0.6082
√ n √5
b) If z = 3, what are the control limits for the mean chart?
100
x́=10+10+10.2+10.2+10.4+ 9.8+9.6+ 9.8+9.8+10.2= =10
10
33
R=3+2+4 +1+3+4 +3+5+ 4+ 4= =3.3
10
Using A2:
LCSx́ =x+ ´
´ A 2R=10+0,577 3,3
( =11.9041
)
LCIx́ =x− ´
´ A2R=10−0.577 3.3=8.0959
( )
´
LCSR=D4R=2,115 3,3
( =6,9795
)
´ 0( 3.3=0
LCIR=D3R= )( )
S6.11 Twelve samples of five parts each were taken from a process that produces bars.
of steel. The length of each bar in the samples was determined. They were tabulated the
results were calculated and the means and ranges. The results were:
National Polytechnic School
Faculty of Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Production Engineering
ADM713
Quito, Ecuador
Determine the upper and lower control limits and the overall means for the X charts.
R. Draw the graph representing the values of the means and the sample ranges. Do the
Do the data indicate that the process is under control? Why or why not?
A2 0.266
D3 0,283
D4 1,717
Limits of graph X:
Graph R limits:
´
LCSŔ=D 4R=1,717∗ 0.0102 inches.
LCSŔ=0.017513 inches.
´
LCIŔ =D 3R=0.283∗0.0102in.
Graph X Graphic R
Day Media Range LCS LCI LCS LCI
10,0043 9,99888 0,01751 0,00288
1 10,002 0.011 1 7 3 7
10,0043 9,99888 0,01751 0,00288
2 10,002 0.014 1 7 3 7
10,0043 9,99888 0,01751 0,00288
3 9,991 0.007 1 7 3 7
National Polytechnic School
Faculty of Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Production Engineering
ADM713
Quito, Ecuador
Graph X
10.01
10.01
10
10
10
10
10
9.99
9.99
9.99
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Graph R
0.03
0.02
0.02
0.01
0.01
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
We can see that the process is out of control, we have points both above
As below our control limits, it is necessary to analyze the cause.
n=8
Z=3
LCSR=D 4R´
LCSR=1.864∗3.25
LCSR=6.058
LCIR=D 3R´
National Polytechnic School
Faculty of Electrical and Electronics Engineering
Production Engineering
ADM713
Quito, Ecuador
LCSR=0.136∗3.25
LCSR=0.442
S6.13 The historical defect rate for the capture of insurance complaint data has been
almost 1.5%. What are the upper and lower control limits of the graph if one wishes to
use a sample size of 100 and 3 sigma limits?
√ √
p1−
´ ( p´ ) 0.015 (1−0.015 )
σ ^p = = =0.01215
n 100
√
p1−
´ ( p´ )
σ ^p = LCSp = p+´ z σ ^ and
p LCIp = p−zσ
´ ^p
n
√
0.02 (1−0.02 )
ṕ=0.02 ⇒ σ^p= =0.014
100
√
0.04 (1−0.04 )
ṕ=0.04 ⇒ σ^p = =0.0196
100
√
0.06 ( 1−0.06 )
ṕ=0.06 ⇒ σ^p =
100 =0.023748
LCSp=0.06+3∗ ( 0.023748 )=0.13124; LCIp=0.06−3∗ ( 0.023748)=−0.0112
√
0.08 ( 1−0.08 )
ṕ=0.08 ⇒ σ^p= =0.02713
100
√
0.01 (1−0.01 )
ṕ=0,1 ⇒ σ^p= =0.03
100
S6.15 The table below presents the results of the DNA sample inspection
taken during the last 10 days. The sample size is 100.
√ √
p∗
´ ( 1− p´ ) 0.057∗( 1−0.057 )
σ ṕ= =
n 100
σ ṕ=0.02318
Control limits:
LCSṕ= ṕ+zσṕ =0.057+3∗0.02318
LCSṕ=0.1265
LCSṕ= ṕ−zσṕ=0.057−3∗0.02318
LCSṕ=−0.01255
0.14
0.12
0.1
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.02
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
-0.02
b) If the number of defects in the next three days is 12, 5, and 13, is the process under
control?
√ √
p∗
´ ( 1− p´ ) 0.066∗( 1−0.066 )
σ ṕ= =
n 100
σ ṕ=0.02498
Control limits:
LCSṕ= ṕ+zσṕ =0.066+3∗0.02498
LCSṕ=0.14189
LCSṕ= ṕ−zσṕ=0.066−3∗0.02498
LCSṕ=−0.0080
0.14
0.12
0.1
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.02
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
-0.02
We can observe that the process is under control. Despite that, until the 7th ...
It has had a correct result, after that the process started to vary with ups and
drops. It is necessary to verify the cause of such variance.
In the past, the defect rate of your product has been 1.5%. What are the
upper and lower control limits of the graph if you wish to use a sample size
Is 500 and z = 3?
n=500
Z=3
ṕ=1.5%=0.015
LCS= ṕ+Zσṕ
LCI=ṕ−Zσṕ
√
ṕ(1−ṕ )
σ ṕ=
n
√
0.015(1−0.015)
LCS=0.015+3
500
LCS=0.0313
√
0.015(1−0.015)
LCI=0.015−3
500
National Polytechnic School
Faculty of Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Production Engineering
ADM713
Quito, Ecuador
LCI=−0.0013 is approximately 0
S6.17 Return to problem S6.16. If the defect rate were 3.5% instead of 1.5%,
What would the control limits be (z = 3)?
√ √
p1−
´ ( p´ ) 0.035 (1−0.035 )
σ ^p = = =0.00822
n 500
Establezca los límites de control superior e inferior con 3σ; n = 250 registros.
LCSp=0.077;LCIp=0.003
√ √
p1−
´ ( p´ ) 0.04 ( 1−0.04 )
σ ^p =
n
=
250 =0.0124
LCSp= ṕ+zσ^p =0.04+3∗ ( 0.0124 )=0.0772
Un cuestonario acompaña cada comida que se sirve y pregunta, entre otras cosas, si el
the patient is satisfied or dissatisfied with the food. The results of a sample of 100
patients during the past 7 days produced the following data:
√ √
p∗
´ ( 1− p´ ) 0.1742∗( 1−0.1724 )
σ ṕ= =
n 100
σ ṕ=0.0379
LCSṕ=0.2880
LCSṕ= ṕ−zσṕ=0.1742−3∗0.0379
LCSṕ=0.0604
Graphic P
0.35
0.3
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
We can observe that the process is under control. Since all the measures are
they are within the control limits.
S6.20 Chicago Supply Company manufactures clips and other office products. Although they are
cheap, the clips have provided the company with a high profit margin. They are taken
samples of 200 items. Below are the results of the last 10
samples. Set the upper and lower control limits for the control chart and
Graph the data. Is the process under control?
n=200
Z=3
Number of errors
ṕ=
total number of samples
50
ṕ=
10∗200
ṕ=0.025
LCS= ṕ+ Zσṕ
LCI=ṕ−Zσṕ
√
ṕ(1−ṕ )
σ ṕ=
n
National Polytechnic School
Faculty of Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Production Engineering
ADM713
Quito, Ecuador
√
0.025(1−0.025)
LCS=0.025+ 3
200
LCS=0.0581
√
0.025(1−0.025)
LCI=0.025−3
200
LCI=−0.0081 is approximately equal to 0
Chart Title
0.07
0.06
0.05
0.04
0.03
0.02
0.01
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
p LCI LCS
As we can see in the graph, the values vary between the upper and lower limits because
the process is under control.
S6.21 The departmental Latenda of Peter Itg, Itg Brothers, is the independent manufacturer of
largest clothing store in Amherst. The store receives an average of six returns per day.
Using z = 3, should any action be taken if the number of returns increases to
nueve en un día?
National Polytechnic School
Faculty of Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Production Engineering
ADM713
Quito, Ecuador
ć=6 z=3
Forć=6
´ √ ´ 3∗ 6=13.3485
LCS=c+3c=6+
c √
√ ´ 6=−1.3485=0
LCI=c−3c=6−3∗
c ´ √
Forć=9
´ √ ´ 3∗ 9=18
LCS=c+3c=9+
c √
c ´ √ ´ 9=0 √
LCI=c−3c=9−3∗
RESPUESTA: si se debe tomar alguna acción al respecto porque el límite superior al aumentar
allows for more returns per day.
6.22. An advertising agency tracks the complaints received weekly about the
ads placed in your city:
a) What type of control chart would you use to monitor this process and why?
b) What are the 3 sigma control limits for this process? Assume that there is no
know the historical complaint rate.
ć=6
´ √ ´ 3∗ 6=13.34
LCS=c+3c=6+
c √
√ ´ 6=−1,348
LCI=c−3c=6−3∗
c ´ √
c) According to the control limits, is the process mean under control? Why?
what yes or why not?
d) Now suppose that the historical complaint rate is 4 calls per week. What are
What would the control limits of 3 sigmas be for this process now? According to the limits.
of control, is the process under control?
ć=4
´ √´
LCS=c+3c=4+3∗
c √
4=10
c ´ √ ´ 4=−2√
LCI=c−3c=4−3∗
Construct a graph c for the errors in the exam and establish the control limits that
contain 99.73% of the random variation in the ratings. What does the graph indicate?
Has the new math program been effective?
LCS=c+
ć √´
´ z c=42.6+ √
3 42.6
LCSć =62.18 errors
LCI=c−z
ć √´
´ c=42.6− 42.6√
LCIć =23,019 errors
Graphic C
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
We can observe that the process is under control. Since all the measures are
are within the control limits.
S6.24 The telephone interviews of 100 'clients' of the tax collection office
From the United States, they are monitored every day randomly. The...
incidents of incorrect information or other errors (such as rudeness towards the
taxpayers). The data from the last week is:
Chart Title
30
25
20
15
10
0
1 2 3 4 5
LCI LCS
S6.25 The accounts receivable department of Rick Wing Manufacturing has had
difficulties for customers to pay the total amount of their invoices. Many customers are
quejan de que las facturas son incorrectas y que no reflejan los materiales que llegan a sus
reception points. The department decided to implement SPC in its process of
billing. To establish the control charts, 10 samples of 50 invoices were taken.
each one for a month and the items on the invoices were reviewed against the notes of
arrivals sent by the company's shipping department, to determine the
Number of invoices that were not correct. The results were:
a) Determine the value of p-bar, that is, the mean of the defective fraction. Afterwards
determine the control limits for the p-chart using a 99.73% confidence level (3
National Polytechnic School
Faculty of Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Production Engineering
ADM713
Quito, Ecuador
Invoice number
Sample No. incorrect n P
1 6 50 0.12
2 5 50 0,1
3 11 50 0.22
4 4 50 0.08
5 0 50 0
6 5 50 0,1
7 3 50 0.06
8 4 50 0.08
9 7 50 0.14
10 2 50 0.04
TOTAL 47 500
47
ṕ= =0.094
500
√ √
p1−
´ ( p´ ) 0.094 ( 1−0.094 )
σ ^p =
n
=
50 =0.0413
LCSp= ṕ+zσ^p =0.094+3∗ ( 0.0413=0.2179
)
GRAPHIC P
0.25
0.2
p 0.15
LCS
LCI
0.1
0.05
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
RESPUESTA: El proceso no está bajo control, la muestra 3 es la que está fuera de control.
National Polytechnic School
Faculty of Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Production Engineering
ADM713
Quito, Ecuador
6.26. The difference between the upper and lower specifications for a process is 0.6".
The standard deviation is 0.1”. What is the process capability ratio, Cp? Interpret.
this number.
0.6
Cp= =6
0.1
S6.27 The chip production process for computers at Meena Chavan Corp. generates
DRAM chips with an average lifespan of 1,800 hours and a σ = 100 hours. The limits of
The upper and lower tolerance are 2,400 and 1,600 hours, respectively. Is this capable?
process of producing DRAM chips within their specification?
Specifysuperior−Specifyinferior 2400−1600
Cp = =
6 Sigma 6( 100)
Cp=1.333
Since the Cp < 1 there are minimal defects and the chip production process can be accepted.
S6.28 Blackburn Inc., a manufacturing company in Nashville, has sent a valve sample.
of cutting to improve its manufacturing process. Its engineering department of
processes conducted some experiments and found that the valve has a mean (µ) of 8.00
and a standard deviation (σ) of .04. Their desired performance is µ = 8.0 and σ = .045. What is the
Cpk of the Blackburn valve?
μ=8
Z=3
σ =0.040
Upper limit=μ+Z (σ)
Lower limit=μ−Z ( σ)
Upper limit=8+3 ( 0.045 )=8.135
Lower limit=8−3 ( 0.045 )=7.865
[ ]
Upper limit−μ μ−Lower limit
Cpk =minimum mode ;
3σ 3σ
[ ]
8.135−8 micro−Lower limit
Cpk =minimode ;
3( 0.04) 3(0.04)
[ ]
8.135−8 8−7.865
Cpk =minimode ;
3( 0.04) 3(0.04)
National Polytechnic School
Faculty of Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Production Engineering
ADM713
Quito, Ecuador
Superior
LCS−x́3.1−3.0
Cpk = = =1.667
3σ 3∗0.02
Inferior
x́−LCI3.0−2.9
Cpk = = =1.667
3σ 3∗0.02
RESPUESTA: El 100% de las unidades reúnen las especificaciones. Con unC pk greater than 1
indicates that the process is better than required by the specification.
[ ]
Upper specification limit−x́ x́−Lower specification limit
Cpk =Minimode ,
3 sigma 3σ
σ =standard deviation=1
National Polytechnic School
Faculty of Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Production Engineering
ADM713
Quito, Ecuador
[ ]
16.5−16 16−15.5
Cpk =Minimum mode ,
3(1) 3 (1)
[ ]
0.5 0.5
Cpk =Minimum mode=0.166 =0.166
3 3
S6.31 A process for filling containers with baby formula must have a measurement
from 3 ounces ±0.150 ounces. 200 jars from the process were sampled. The results showed
that the average amount of food poured into the containers was 3.042 ounces. The
The standard deviation of that amount was 0.034 ounces. Determine the value of Cpk.
In general, what proportion of the packages meets the specifications?
Since we obtained a negative number, we can conclude that the process does not comply.
the specifications).
S6.32 As the supervisor in charge of shipments and receptions, you need to determine the
average output quality in a plant where it is known that the incoming batches of its line
They have an average defect rate of 3%. Their plan is to sample 80.
units of every 1,000 in a lot. The number of defects in the sample should not exceed
That plan provides an acceptance probability of .79 (79%) for each batch. What
What is its average output quality?
N=1000
n=80
C=3
Pd=3 % =0.03
Pa(OC)=79%=0.79
National Polytechnic School
School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Production Engineering
ADM713
Quito, Ecuador
(Pd)(Pa)(N −n)
AOQ=
N
(0.03)(0.79)(1000−80)
AOQ=
1000
AOQ=0.0218∗100%
AOQ=2.18%
S6.33 An acceptance sampling plan has lots of 500 pieces and a sample size
of 60. The number of defects in the sample cannot be more than 2. This plan, based on
An OC curve has an acceptance probability of .57 when the incoming lots have
a defect rate of 4%, what is the historical average for this process? What will it tell you?
What is the average output quality of your customer?
PdPa ( N−n)
A0Q=
N
0.04∗0.57∗( 500−60)
A0Q= =0.020064
500
I would tell my client that the highest defect percentage is 2.0064% and this is the
average output quality.
S6.34 West Batery Corp. has recently been receiving complaints from the vendors to
retailing concerning how 9-volt batteries do not last as long as others
brands. James West, responsible for the TQM program at the West plant in Austin,
It is considered that there is no problem because their batteries have had an average lifespan of 50.
hours, almost 10% more than the competitors' models. Increase the useful life to more than
50 hours would require a new level of technology not available to West. However,
West está lo suficientemente preocupado como para establecer una revisión horaria en la
assembly line. Previously, after ensuring that the process was running in
appropriately, West took samples of 5 nine-volt batteries during the next 25
hours in order to establish the standards for the control chart limits. Those 25
Samples are presented in the following table:
National Polytechnic School
Faculty of Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Production Engineering
ADM713
Quito, Ecuador
With these established limits, West took the data from 5 more hours, which is presented in the
next table:
a) Determine the means and the upper and lower control limits for X and R (using
only the first 25 hours).
We obtain the following data based on the information obtained in the process:
A2 0.153
D3 0.459
D4 1,541
Hour 1 2 3 4 5 X R
1 51 50 49 50 50 50 2
2 45 47 70 46 36 48.8 34
3 50 35 48 39 47 43.8 15
4 55 70 50 30 51 51.2 40
5 49 38 64 36 47 46.8 28
6 59 62 40 54 64 55.8 24
7 36 33 49 48 56 44.4 23
8 50 67 53 43 40 50.6 27
9 44 52 46 47 44 46.6 8
10 70 45 50 47 41 50.6 29
11 57 54 62 45 36 50.8 26
12 56 54 47 42 62 52.2 20
13 40 70 58 45 44 51.4 30
14 52 58 40 52 46 49.6 18
15 57 42 52 58 59 53.6 17
16 62 49 42 33 55 48.2 29
17 40 39 49 59 48 47 20
18 64 50 42 57 50 52.6 22
19 58 53 52 48 50 52.2 10
20 60 50 41 41 50 48.4 19
21 52 47 48 58 40 49 18
22 55 40 56 49 45 49 16
23 47 48 50 50 48 48.6 3
24 50 50 49 51 51 50.2 2
25 51 50 51 51 62 53 12
Averages 49,776 19.68
Graphic X
Graph R
´
LCSŔ=D 4R=1.541∗19.68 hours
LCSŔ=30.326 hours
´
LCIŔ =D 3R=0.459∗19.68 hours
National Polytechnic School
Faculty of Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Production Engineering
ADM713
Quito, Ecuador
Graph X Graphic R
Hour X R LCS LCI LCS LCI
46.7649
1 50 2 52,78704 6 30,32688 9,03312
46,7649
2 48.8 34 52.78704 6 30,32688 9,03312
46,7649
3 43.8 15 52.78704 6 30,32688 9,03312
46.7649
4 51.2 40 52.78704 6 30,32688 9,03312
46,7649
5 46.8 28 52.78704 6 30.32688 9.03312
46.7649
6 55.8 24 52.78704 6 30.32688 9.03312
46.7649
7 44.4 23 52.78704 6 30,32688 9,03312
46.7649
8 50,6 27 52.78704 6 30,32688 9,03312
46.7649
9 46.6 8 52,78704 6 30,32688 9,03312
46,7649
10 50.6 29 52.78704 6 30,32688 9,03312
46.7649
11 50.8 26 52.78704 6 30.32688 9.03312
46,7649
12 52.2 20 52.78704 6 30.32688 9.03312
46.7649
13 51.4 30 52.78704 6 30.32688 9.03312
46.7649
14 49.6 18 52.78704 6 30,32688 9,03312
46.7649
15 53.6 17 52.78704 6 30.32688 9.03312
46,7649
16 48.2 29 52.78704 6 30,32688 9,03312
46.7649
17 47 20 52.78704 6 30,32688 9,03312
46.7649
18 52.6 22 52.78704 6 30,32688 9,03312
46.7649
19 52.2 10 52.78704 6 30,32688 9,03312
46,7649
20 48.4 19 52.78704 6 30.32688 9.03312
21 49 18 52,78704 46,7649 30,32688 9,03312
National Polytechnic School
School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Production Engineering
ADM713
Quito, Ecuador
6
46.7649
22 49 16 52.78704 6 30,32688 9,03312
46.7649
23 48.6 3 52.78704 6 30,32688 9,03312
46.7649
24 50.2 2 52.78704 6 30.32688 9.03312
46.7649
25 53 12 52.78704 6 30,32688 9,03312
Prom: 49,776 19,68
Graphic X
57
55
53
51
49
47
45
43
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Graphic R
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
We can observe that the process is out of control, we have points both above
As it is below our control limits, it is necessary to analyze the cause. In addition to 5
followed points in decline must be investigated what is the cause of such progressive change.
National Polytechnic School
Faculty of Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Production Engineering
ADM713
Quito, Ecuador