0 ratings 0% found this document useful (0 votes) 13 views 14 pages Bs
The document is a legal plaint filed by Suresh against M Ningegowda in the Senior Civil Court at T Narasipura, seeking a declaration of ownership and permanent injunction regarding a property claimed to be fraudulently taken by the defendant. The plaintiff asserts that he has been in possession of the property since his mother's death and that the defendant has unlawfully attempted to interfere with his ownership. The plaint includes various applications for court orders and details the history of the property and the plaintiff's grievances against the defendant.
AI-enhanced title and description
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content,
claim it here .
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
Go to previous items Go to next items
ise
TITLE SHEET
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
AT T NARASIPURA
O.8.No___/ 2025
Plaintiff —: Suresh
-v/s-
Defendant : M Ningegowda
INDEX
SLNo.
Description
Pages
Plaint under Order.7 Rule.1 of CPC
Verifying Amfidavit
Valuation slip
APPLICATION UNDER ORDER VI RULE 14-A OF
THE CPC
APPLICATION UNDER ORDER 39 RULE 1
AND 2 OF C.P.c
Vakalath
List with Documents.
‘One set copy of Plaint, Verifying Affidavit, and
Application in Green sheet to Court.
List with Xerox copies of Documents
Process memo
6 set copy of Plaint, Verifying Affidavit,
Valuation slip, IA’s to the Defendant.
Advocate for Plaintiff
Vinayakumar P, advocate
Arya’s Law Associate’s,
No 105/1, Krishna Complex,
Bangalore -560044, MOB-
9986857597, Mail-
vinayarya1884@[Link]
12"
main Road,6"BlockRajajinagar,IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
AT T NARASIPURA
©.8.No___/ 2025
Between
Suresh S/o Late Eshwarachari,
Aged about 58 years,
R/at No.37, Nuggahalli Koppalu Village,
Bannur Hobli,
T Narasipura Taluk-571101 Plaintiff
AND
M Ningegowda S/o Late Manchegowda
Aged about 62 years,
Nuggahalli Koppalu Village,
Bannur Hobli,
T Narasipura Taluk-571101 Defendant
PLAINT UNDER ORDER VII RULE 1 OF C.
The Plaintiff beg to state as follows:-
1. The address of the Plaintiff for the purpose of service of
notices, Processes etc, from this Hon'ble court is as shot
the cause title and the Plaintiff may also be served
her counsel Sri Vinaya Kumar P, Renuka H A advocat
at no 105/1, Krishna Complex, 12% Main Road,
Rajajinagara,Bangalore- 560044, Mob-9986857;
Vinayarya1884@[Link]
2. It is submitted that the Plaint schedule pri
Plaintiff mother by name Late K
Eshwarachari has acquired
allotment(Grant) on 30.10.1978 andee
“Sie
by Hegguru Grama Panchayath in assessment No.37, Janjar
No.836, measuring east by west 40 feet north by south 60 feet
situated at Nuggahalli Koppallu Village, Bannur Hobli, T
Narasipura Taluk and plaintiff is belongs to Hindhu
Vishwakarma Cast and after issuing grant certificate the
Khata has changed in the name of the plaintiff Mother and till
date khata is stand in the name of the plaintiff mother and
plaintiff mother has died on 16,08.2012 And after the death
of plaintiff mother plaintiff only possession and enjoyment
of the suit schedule property till today.
3. Itis submitted that, the defendant was member of the Heggur
Panchayath in that time the defendant as fraudulently
created Janjar No.461, assessment No.37 in to his name
after obtaining the khata the defendant has started
harassment to the plaintiff mother as during the life time of
the plaintiff mother he has given the several applications to
cancel the Janjar No.461, assessment No.37 from 17.07.2009
to till death of the plaintiff mother.
4. After the death of the plaintiff mother plaintiff has given a
several applications to concerned authorities but they are not
taken the any auction against the to defendant. And on
23.05.2002 the defendant have illegally trespass the plaintiff
schedule property and he has man handling the plaintiff as
such he has given the police complaint against to the
defendant and also again the defendant illegally trespass the
Suit schedule property and cut the trees in the plaintiff
schedule property as such complainant has given the
complaint to the Bannur police station on 05.06.2023 but
they have not take any auction against to the defendant.
5. Further plaintiff submits that, on 10/07/2028 the plaintiff
and Nagarika Hakku Rakshna Samithi member are made a
= ai the au Panchayath, Mysore and after that
vyath has issued a direction to Nudel office to
Given Mahazer report and after that Villa Panchayath has
>j ie
ff to approach EO office to after that
directed to the plaintil
T Narasipura
plaintiff has fled a Appeal before the
/ Panchayath court against to the defendant in Appeal
No.12/2024-2025 after hearing the ‘both the parties the
Hon'ble court has rafter to Civil court:
is submitted that, absolutely the defendants have no
6. It is
t what’ so ever over the
manner of right, title or interes!
schedule property . In spite of it the defendants is trying to
kmock off the schedule property and they are trying to
interfere with the peaceful possession they having no right
over the schedule property. Therefore they are trying to
interfere with the plaintiff peaceful possession and enjoyment
of plaint schedule property and also they are trying to sell the
property to other persons.
7. It is submitted that the cause of action arose when defendant
has fraudulently obtained the kahata and on 17.07.2009
when plaintiff mother has given the compliant and on
18.09.2025 when Hon'ble tribunal has dismiss the petition
also about 7 days back i.e. on 01/11/2025 the defendants
along with their henchmen have tried to interfere with the
schedule property.
8. The plaintiff submits that he is helpless and having no
supporters in the locality but the defendants are very
powerful person and they are having both money and political
influence behind their back and they are not believe in law.
‘As such his said attitude cannot be resisted without the order
of this Hon’ble Court. Hence without any alternative the
Plaintiff has approached this Hon'ble Court Hence itis a suit
for Declaration and permanent injunction.yy
-4-
No.836,
ent No.37, Janjar ,
9. The schedule property assess™m: :
| measuring east by west 40 feet north by south se es
situated at No.37 Nuggahalli Koppallu Village, ee lobli,
7 Narasipura Taluk within the jurisdiction of this Hon'ble
Court.
10. The suit is valued both for the purpose of court fee and
jurisdiction at Rs. /- under Section 26(C) of Karnataka
Court fee and suit valuation Act and hence court fee of Rs
/- is deposited. A separate valuation slip is also filed.
PRAYER
The plaintiff therefore humbly prays that this Hon'ble Court
be pleased to pass judgment and decree in his favor and
against the defendants for Declaration by declaring the
Plaintiff are only the owner of the scheduled property
1. By declaring the null and void of Janjar No.461,
assessment No.37 situated the Nuggahalli Koppallu
Village, Bannur Hobli, T Narasipura Taluk.
2. By declaring the plaintiff the absolute owner of the suit
schedule property
3. By directing the Heggur Grampanchayath to change Khata
in to plaintiff Name.
4 And also Permanent injunction, restraining the defendants
from retraining the defendants by an order of permanent
injunction
And granting cost and such other relief as this Hon’ble
Court deems fit to grant in the circumstances of the case
5.
in the interest of justice an equity
SCHEDULE PROPERTY
All the piece and Parcel of the property assessment No.37, Janjar
No.836, measuring east by west 40 feet north by south 60 feet
situated at Nuggahalli Koppallu Village, Bannur Hobli, T
oe
P4792
Nerasipura Thaluk measuring East to West: 40 feet North to
South: 60 feet totally measuring 2400 Squire feet and having
boundary on:
East by : Vacant Site
West by Road
North by : House of Nanjegowda
South by :Road
Advocate for Plaintiff Plaintiff
VERIFICATION
What are all stated above are true to the best of my knowledge,
belief and information and in token whereof We have signed here
under.
Date:
Place: T Narasipura‘THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
AT T NARASIPURA
[Link] / 2025
Plaintiff : Suresh
-V/s-
Defendant : M Ningegowda
IN THE COURT OF
VERIFYING AFFIDAVIT
1 Suresh S/o Late Eshwarachari, Aged about 58 years, R/at
No.37, Nuggahalli Koppalu, Bannur Hobli, T Narasipura Taluk-
571101 the Plaintiff in the above case do hereby solemnly affirm
and state on oath as follows:
1. That I have filed the above suit against the defendants
for declaration and injunction over the schedule properties. As
such contents of plaint may kindly be read as part and parcel of
this affidavit.
2. 1 State on oath that the contents of plaint from paras
1 to 11 and entire averments of the plaint are true to the best of
my knowledge, belief and information and in token where of I
have signed to the plaint.
I do swear in the name of God that the contents of this
affidavit are true and correct and I have signed here under.
IDENTIFIED BY ME
DEPONENTSee
/ IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
[ AT T NARASIPURA
| 0.8.No__/ 2025
Plaintiff = Suresh
v/s-
Defendant : M Ningegowda
[Link]. {2025
Applicant : ~~‘ Suresh
vis
Opponent : MNingegowda
ao Defendant
APPLICATION UNDER ORDER. VI RULE 14-A OF THE cPpc
For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit applicant /
Plaintiff humbly prays that the Hon’ble court be The addresses
of the parties furnished in the cause title of the plaint is true and
correct for the purpose of issuing notices through court as well
registered post in the above case in the interest of justice and
equity.
Advocate for Plaintiff Plaintiff/ Applicant
Date:
Place: T NarasipuraEom
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
AT T NARASIPURA
O.S.No__/ 2025
Suresh
-v/s-
Defendant : M Ningegowda
Plaint:
AFFIDAVIT
1 Suresh S/o Late Eshwarachari, Aged about 58 years, R/at
No.37, Nuggahalli Koppalu, Bannur Hobli, T Narasipura Taluk-
571101 the Plaintiff in the above case do hereby solemnly affirm
and state on oath as follows:
1, That I have filed the above suit against the defendants
for declaration and injunction over the schedule properties. As
such contents of plaint may kindly be read as part and parcel of
this affidavit.
2. Tam the plaintiff in the above case and I am fully conversant
with the facts of the case and for the purpose of registered
address, my address is the same as mentioned in the cause title.
I will receive all the summons/notice on that address
I do swear in the name of God that the contents of this
affidavit are true and correct and I have signed here under.
IDENTIFIED BY ME
ADVOCATE DEPONENT
PLACE: T NarasipuraSlOe
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
AT T NARASIPURA
O.S.N 2025
Plaintiff : Suresh
-v/S-
Defendant : M Ningegowda
[Link]. [2025
Applicant : Suresh
v/s
Opponent : MNingegowda
For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit
‘Applicant/Plaintif? humbly prays that this Hon’ble Court be pleased to
pass an ad interim order of ex-parte temporary injunction against the
defendants/opponents restraining them not to alienate the application of
the plaint schedule property and dealt with the same pending disposal of
the suit in the interest of justice and equity.
SCHEDULE PROPERTY
All the piece and parcel of the property assessment No.37, Janjar No.836,
measuring east by west 40 feet north by south 60 feet situated at Nuggahalli
Koppallu Village, Bannur Hobli, T Narasipura Thaluk measuring East to
West: 40 feet North to South: 60 feet totally measuring 2400 Squire fect
and having boundary on:
East by _: Vacant Site
‘West by Road
North by: House of Nanjegowda
South by :Road
Advocate for Plaintiff Pista
DATE:
PLACE: T Narasipura Fate
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
AT T NARASIPURA
O.S.No___/ 2025
Plaintiff: Suresh
-v/s-
Defendant : M Ningegowda
AFFIDAVIT
1 Suresh S/o Late Eshwarachari, Aged about 58 years, R/at
No.37, Nuggahalli Koppalu, Bannur Hobli, T Narasipura Taluk-
571101. the Plaintiff in the above case do hereby solemnly affirm
and state on oath as follows:
1. 1 State on oath that, the Plaint schedule property is belongs
Plaintiff mother by name Late Kamalamma W/o Late
Eshwarachari has acquired through Government
allotment(Grant) on 30.10.1978 and grant certificate Issued
by Hegguru Grama Panchayath in assessment No.37, Janjar
No.836, measuring east by west 40 feet north by south 60 feet
situated at Nuggahalli Koppallu Village, Bannur Hobli, T
Narasipura Taluk and plaintiff is belongs to Hindhu
Vishwakarma Cast and after issuing grant certificate the
Khata has changed in the name of the plaintiff Mother and till
date khata is stand in the name of the plaintiff mother and
plaintiff mother has died on 16.08.2012 And after the death
of plaintiff mother plaintiff only possession and enjoyment
of the suit schedule property till today.
2. 1 State on oath that, the defendant was member of the Heggur
Panchayath in that time the defendant as fraudulently
created Janjar No.461, assessment No.37 in to his name Ps
after obtaining the khata the defendant hes sane i
harassment to the plaintiff mother as during the life time
the plaintiff mother he has given the several appli to
cancel the Janjar No.461, assessment No.97 from, 2009
to till death of the plaintiff mother.-12-
‘After the death of the plaintiff mother
3.1 State on oath that, te iceceraca
authorities but they are not t ee ave
the to defendant. And on 23.05.2002
illegally trespass the plaintiff schedule property and he has
man handling the plaintiff as such he has given the police
complaint against to the defendant and also again the
defendant illegally trespass the suit schedule property and
cut the trees in the plaintiff schedule property as such
complainant has given the complaint to the Bannur police
Station on 05.06.2023 but they have not take any auction
against to the defendant.
4-1 State on oath that, on 10/07/2023 the plaintiff and
Nagarika Hakiuu Rakshna Samithi member are made a strike
{In front of the Jilla Panchayath, Mysore and after that the
Jillapanchayath has issued a direction to Nudel office to given
Mahazer report and after that Jilla Panchayath has directed
‘o the plaintiff to approach EO office to after that plaintiff has
filed a Appeal before the T Narasipura Panchayath court
Sgainst to the defendant in Appeal No.12/2024-2025 after
hearing the both the Parties the Hon'ble court has rafter to
Civil court,
5.1 State on oath that, absolutely the defendants have no
manner of right, title or interest what’
SO ever over the
Property to other persons,13:
.1 State o1
6. oath that, the cause of action arose when
a has fraudulently obtained the kahata and on
c 009 when plaintiff mother has given the compliant
! a 18.09.2025 when Hon'ble tribunal has dismiss the
petition also about 7 days back ie. on 01/11/2025 the
defendants along with their henchmen have tried to interfere
with the schedule property.
7.1 State on oath that, he is helpless and having no supporters
in the locality but the defendants are very powerful person
and they are having both money and political influence
behind their back and they are not believe in law. As such his
said attitude cannot be resisted without the order of this
Hon'ble Court. Hence without any alternative the Plaintiff
has approached this Hon’ble Court Hence it is a suit for
Declaration and permanent injunction.
8.1 State on oath that, The schedule property assessment
No.37, Janjar No.836, measuring cast by west 40 feet north
by south 60 feet situated at No.37 Nuggahalli Koppalhy
Village, Bannur Hobli, T Narasipura Taluk within the
jurisdiction of this Hon’ble Court
9.1 state on oath that I have made out a prima facie case and
balance of conveyance tilts heavily in my favour if order of ex:
parte temporary injunction is not granted, the very purpose
of filing of this suit will be defeated and defendants shall
definitely dispossess me from the suit schedule property by
force and they will sell the schedule property, and they will
interfering with my peace full possession and enjoyment of
suit schedule property that event greater hardship and injury
will be caused to me and it cannot be compensated in any
manner. If the application is allowed no hardship or injustice
will be caused to other side.-14- t
In this circumstance | humbly submit that granting the reliefas
prayed for is necessary in the interest of justice and equity
Ido swear in the name of God that the contents of this affidavit
are true and correct and I have signed this at T Narasipura.
Identified by me Deponent
Advocate
Date:
Place: T Narasipura