**dividends are gr
Rearrange formula and solve for rE
30 = 3 / (rE - 0.01)
rE = 0.11
11%
return investors demand on the investment
idends are growing at the same rate, so we use the constant dividend growt
nt dividend growth model
**In order to determine whether a project should be taken on or not
if the PV of the cashflows are greater than the intial investment).
There are 2 ways we can solve this.
#1 use formula
NPV = PV of cashflows - PV of intial investment **find pv of each
pv of yr1 8.92857142857143
pv of yr2 15.9438775510204
pv of yr 3 14.2356049562682
pv of yr4 9.53277117607247
total pv 48.64082511
subtract outflo -1.35917489
NPV = -1.36
#2 OR Use NPV formula
NPV = -$1.36=NPV(0.12,10,20,20,15) - 50
e taken on or not we need to determine the NPV of the project (ie. We need
investment).
**find pv of each cash flow
ject (ie. We need to see
If RiverRocks is going to acquire Raft Adventures, then it should use a
appropriate for the risk of Raft Adventures’ cash flows. That should be
Adventures, which is 15%. So RiverRocks should use 15% as the discou
evaluation of the acquisition.
**the higher the weighted average, the riskier the investm
n it should use a discount rate that is
ws. That should be the WACC of Raft
15% as the discount rate for its
iskier the investment
NPV = PV of cashflows - PV of intial investment costs. Essentially, NPV
We can describe the cashflows as a growing perpetuity. To find the PV
PV = FCF1/(r-g)^n FCF1=15 million
free cashflow 1 r=WACC = 0.15
g = 0.04
Therefore, the NPV = FCF1/(r-g)^n - FCF0
NPV = 36363636.36
NPV = =(15000000/(0.15-0.04)^1) - 100000000
**cant use excel for a perpetuity
s. Essentially, NPV helps to determine the PV of cash flows after the intial cos
uity. To find the PV of the cashflows we can use the growing perpertuity form
FC0 = intial investment costs
for a perpetuity
fter the intial costs.
g perpertuity formula:
The direct issuing costs should be included as a direct cost of the acqu
NPV = $ 36,363,636.36
New NPV = $ 29,363,636.36
The NPV is positive which means the PV of the cashlfows are greater t
with the project.
cost of the acquisition.
ws are greater than the PV of costs of the project. Therefore, they should go
e, they should go ahead