Steps Involved In The Process Of Innovation
Paper by Yetunde Oladeji
Innovation is a multi-step process that includes the invention of new ideas and their
application into marketable and sustainable goods or services (Iqbal and Suzianti, 2021). For
a product or activity to be considered an innovation, it must be implemented and put into use
or be available for use. This is what distinguishes innovation from other concepts such as
invention (Oslo Manual, 2018).
Here are the general stages involved in the process of innovation:
1. Idea Generation: This is the first stage when fresh ideas are produced. It might be
sparked by internal resources or external pressures such as market trends, consumer
feedback, or technical breakthroughs.
2. Idea Screening: The produced ideas are filtered to exclude those that are deemed to
have less potential for success.
3. Concept Development and Testing: The promising ideas are then transformed into
product concepts. These ideas are tested on the target market for acceptability.
4. Commercial Analysis: This comprises examining the commercial feasibility of the
product idea including cost, revenue, and profitability estimates.
5. Product Development: The approved product idea is transformed into an actual
product.
6. Test Marketing: The product is introduced within a small geographical region, so its
market acceptability may be evaluated.
7. Commercialization: The product is released into the market with full manufacturing
and marketing operations.
Sustainable innovation is about making significant improvements to a product, service,
processes, capabilities and technology, either for commercial or internal use, in a way that not
only provides economic benefits but also social and environmental benefits (Calik and
Bardudeen, 2016).
In the context of a steel manufacturing company, sustainable innovation can be particularly
challenging due to the industry’s inherent complexities. Let’s consider the factors for a
project aimed at water recycling and treatment:
General and Task Factors
• Scale of Operations: Steel manufacturing is a large-scale operation with substantial
water usage. Any changes or innovations can have significant implications on the
ecological impact of water.
• Technical Complexity: The process of water recycling and treatment in steel
manufacturing is technically complex, requiring specialized knowledge and
equipment.
• Cost Implications: The initial investment for installing water recycling and treatment
facilities can be high.
• Operational Changes: Implementing water recycling may require changes to
existing processes, which could face resistance from staff accustomed to current
procedures.
• Regulatory Hurdles: Compliance with environmental regulations can be challenging,
especially if regulations vary across different regions.
Recommendations
To achieve sustainable innovation, the firm would need to invest in advanced water
treatment technologies that can efficiently recycle water and ensure the reduction of
wastewater, provide training to its staff about the importance of water recycling and how to
operate the new systems and collaborate with environmental regulators to ensure compliance
and possibly influence the creation of more favorable legislation.
Companies that proactively engage in sustainable practices often enjoy a positive reputation,
which can lead to increased customer loyalty and potential market opportunities.
By addressing these factors, a steel manufacturing company can effectively navigate the
challenges of sustainable innovation and contribute to the broader goal of environmental
sustainability.
Design Thinking In The Models Of Innovation And Sustainability
Design Thinking according to de Villiers (2022), is a non-linear, iterative process that teams
use to understand people, question assumptions, reframe challenges, and generate novel
solutions. It comprises five phases- Empathize, Define, Ideate, Prototype, and Test. It is
particularly beneficial to handle challenges that are ill-defined or unknown.
Relevance of design thinking in innovation and sustainability:
Design thinking may help businesses generate new solutions that are desired, practicable, and
viable for their consumers, stakeholders, and the environment. Design thinking may also help
firms link their innovation activities with the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development,
which asks for a transformational and integrated strategy to meet global challenges (Ziadlou,
2021).
Process Of Design Thinking In Organizations
Design thinking is not a linear or inflexible process but rather a fluid and iterative one that
can be adapted to new situations and difficulties. However, a popular framework that may
lead firms to use design thinking is the following:
• Empathize: This stage entails performing user research, such as interviews,
observations, surveys, and focus groups, to obtain a thorough knowledge of the users
and their wants, pain spots, emotions, and motivations. It also entails generating user
personas, empathy maps, and journey maps to synthesize and illustrate the user data.
• Define: This step entails studying and interpreting the user data and defining the
fundamental issue or opportunity that the users encounter. It also entails constructing
a problem statement or a point of view that encapsulates the user requirements and
insights and directs the ideation process.
• Ideate: This stage includes producing a huge number of alternative solutions that
address the issue statement or the point of view, utilizing methods such as
brainstorming, mind mapping, drawing, and storyboarding. It also entails choosing
and prioritizing the most promising ideas based on characteristics such as
attractiveness, practicality, and viability.
• Prototype: This stage includes developing low-fidelity and physical representations
of the chosen concepts, such as mock-ups, models, or simulations, that can be tested
with actual users and stakeholders. It also requires identifying the assumptions and
hypotheses that need to be confirmed and the metrics and indicators that need to be
assessed.
• Test: This step includes doing user testing, such as interviews, observations,
experiments, and feedback sessions, to assess the prototypes and their performance
and to acquire data and insights that might influence future changes. It also entails
iterating and improving the prototypes depending on the user input and the test
findings.
• Implement: This step comprises designing and deploying the completed solution and
confirming its quality, dependability, and usage. It also entails planning and
implementing the scaling and dispersion strategies, and the communication and
marketing campaigns.
• Evaluate: This phase entails quantifying and evaluating the solution's influence and
efficacy as well as how it contributes to the objectives and results of sustainability. It
also entails identifying and reporting the lessons learned, the best practices, and the
areas for improvement.
Benefits And Risks of Design Thinking
The benefits of Design thinking include enhancing the customer’s loyalty by designing
solutions that are personalized to the users' requirements, increasing innovation by promoting
a culture of creativity, and improving the organization’s performance and competitiveness.
The risks of Design thinking include the fact that the numerous iterative processes can make
it time-consuming and expensive, the requirements for team members with multiple
disciplines may impact the effectiveness of communication within the team, and the approach
toward the needs of the customer may limit innovation as sometimes the customer may not
know what they need. E.g. Smartphones combined with camera features etc.
References
Bern (2021) Climate protection: Federal Council adopts Switzerland’s long-term climate
strategy. Available at: [Link]
releases/[Link] (Accessed: 07 December
2023).
Buchanan, R., 2019. Systems thinking and design thinking: The search for principles in the
world we are making. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and
Innovation, 5(2), pp.85-104.
Calik, E. and Bardudeen, F. (2016). A Measurement Scale to Evaluate Sustainable Innovation
Performance in Manufacturing Organizations. Procedia CIRP, 40(ISSN 2212-8271),
pp.449–454. doi:[Link]
Villiers, R. (2022). Design Thinking as a Problem Solving Tool. The Handbook of Creativity
& Innovation in Business: A Comprehensive Toolkit of Theory and Practice for
Developing Creative Thinking Skills (pp. 223-242). Singapore: Springer Nature
Singapore.
Dormido, L., Garrido, I., L’Hotellerie-Fallois, P. and Santillán, J. (2023). Climate change and
sustainable growth: international initiatives and European policies. There is a Spanish
version of this edition with the same number.
Garidzirai, R. (2020). Time Series Analysis of Carbondioxide Emission, Population, Carbon
Tax and Energy use in South Africa. International Journal of Energy Economics and
Policy, 10(5), pp.353–360. doi:[Link]
Garsous, G., et al. (2023), "Net effective carbon rates", OECD Taxation Working Papers, No.
61, OECD Publishing, Paris, [Link]
Gokhale, H. (2021). Japan’s carbon tax policy: Limitations and policy suggestions. Current
Research in Environmental Sustainability, 3, p.100082.
doi:[Link]
Haites, E. (2018). Carbon taxes and greenhouse gas emissions trading systems: what have we
learned? Climate policy, 18(8), pp.955-966.
Hotha, K.K., 2023. Unleashing the Power of Innovation in CDMOs through Customer-
Centricity and Culture of Service. American Journal of Industrial and Business
Management, 13(4), pp.234-246.
Iqbal, M. and Suzianti, A., 2021. New product development process design for small and
medium enterprises: A systematic literature review from the perspective of open
innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(2),
p.153.
Kauffman, R.J. and Naldi, M., 2020. Research directions for sharing economy
issues. Electronic commerce research and applications, 43, p.100973.
Mahaffy, P.G., Matlin, S.A., Holme, T.A. and MacKellar, J., 2019. Systems thinking for
education about the molecular basis of sustainability. Nature Sustainability, 2(5),
pp.362-370.
Maraveas, C., Karavas, C.S., Loukatos, D., Bartzanas, T., Arvanitis, K.G. and Symeonaki, E.,
2023. Agricultural Greenhouses: Resource Management Technologies and
Perspectives for Zero Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Agriculture, 13(7), p.1464.
World Population Review (2022). CO2 Emissions by Country 2020. [online]
[Link]. Available at:
[Link]
(Accessed: 14 December 2023).
METI (2022) Japan’s roadmap to ‘Beyond-zero’ carbon, METI Ministry of Economy, Trade
and Industry. Available at:
[Link]
/ (Accessed: 07 December 2023).
MOEJ (2021) Achieving net Zero GHG emissions by 2050 in Japan policies and measures ...
Available at: [Link] (Accessed: 07 December
2023).
Nippon (2023). DOWNLOAD | Sustainability | NIPPON STEEL. [online]
[Link]. Available at:
[Link] [Accessed 10 Dec. 2023].
Obayashi , Y. and Shimizu, R. (2023) Nippon Steel Could Buy More Stakes in coking coal
and iron ore mines. Available at: [Link]
steel-could-buy-more-stakes-coking-coal-iron-ore-mines-2023-03-02/ (Accessed: 07
December 2023).
OECD (2018). Oslo Manual 2018: Guidelines for Collecting, Reporting and Using Data on
Innovation, 4th Edition. [online] OECD iLibrary, Paris: Organisation for Economic
Co-operation and Development, pp.20–21. Available at: [Link]
[Link]/docserver/9789264304604-
[Link]?expires=1699569702&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=451845F124F7BA
3DF6D3DF2144E97A9D [Accessed 9 Nov. 2023].
OECD (2021). Effective Carbon Rates 2021. [online] Available at:
[Link] (Accessed: 07
December 2023).
Pye, S., Broad, O., Bataille, C., Brockway, P., Daly, H.E., Freeman, R., Gambhir, A., Geden,
O., Rogan, F., Sanghvi, S. and Tomei, J., 2021. Modelling net-zero emissions energy
systems requires a change in approach. Climate Policy, 21(2), pp.222-231.
Ratha, D.S. and Venkataraman, G. (1995). Environmental impact of iron ore mines in Goa,
India. International Journal of Environmental Studies, 47(1), pp.43–53.
doi:[Link]
Ripple, W.J., Wolf, C., Gregg, J.W., Levin, K., Rockström, J., Newsome, T.M., Betts, M.G.,
Huq, S., Law, B.E., Kemp, L., Kalmus, P. and Lenton, T.M. (2022). World Scientists’
Warning of a Climate Emergency 2022. BioScience, 72(12).
doi:[Link]
Sabeen, A.H., Noor, Z.Z., Ngadi, N., Almuraisy, S. and Raheem, A.B., 2018. Quantification
of environmental impacts of domestic wastewater treatment using life cycle
assessment: a review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 190, pp.221-233.
Suer, J., Traverso, M. and Jäger, N. (2022). Review of Life Cycle Assessments for Steel and
Environmental Analysis of Future Steel Production Scenarios. Sustainability, 14(21),
p.14131. doi:[Link]
Teusch, J., Theodoropoulos, K., Tricaud, A. and Kim Lan Mellon (2022). Pricing
Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Turning Climate Targets into Climate Action - OECD.
[online] [Link]. Available at: [Link]
[Link] [Accessed
15 Dec. 2023].
U.N. (2023) Net zero coalition, United Nations. Available at:
[Link] (Accessed: 14 December
2023).
UNCTAD (2022) Key statistics and trends in International Trade 2022 - UNCTAD.
Available at: [Link]
(Accessed: 07 December 2023).
UNFCCC (2022) [Link]. Available at: [Link]
the-paris-agreement (Accessed: 14 December 2023).
World Bank Group, (2022) South Africa: Integrating development and climate goals requires
a transition that is low-carbon, climate-resilient, and just, World Bank. Available at:
[Link]
development-and-climate-goals-can-be-achieved-by-adopting-a-low-carbon-climate-
resilient--just-transition (Accessed: 07 December 2023).
Ziadlou, D., 2021. Strategies during digital transformation to make progress in achievement
of sustainable development by 2030. Leadership in Health Services, 34(4), pp.375-
391.