Phonology Mid-Term Study Questions
Uploaded by
English TeaPhonology Mid-Term Study Questions
Uploaded by
English TeaCommon questions
Powered by AIDynamic neutralization is when phonological distinctions are neutralized due to phonological rules that apply across specific contexts, such as vowel nasalization before nasal consonants in French. Static neutralization occurs when certain phonemes do not appear in certain phonetic environments even though no active rule changes them, such as the restriction of English /ŋ/ to coda positions. Both types are illustrated in various phonological contexts, enforcing fewer surface distinctions .
Determining the underlying representation involves analyzing the phonological rules and processes affording consistent grammar application across varied phonetic contexts. In Icelandic, identifying consonantal palatalization and realizing triggers through historical shifts helps isolate underlying phonemes. In Lardil, understanding vowel alternations informs the base form analysis while distinguishing phonemic vowels from surface realisations. In Tonkawa, examining reduplication facilitates identifying syllabic structure at the abstract level. These analyses hinge on systematic application of the language's phonological processes to discern the underlying systematic rules and mechanics .
In free rule application, phonological rules apply independently without specific sequential constraints, meaning no predetermined order affects the output. In contrast, ordered rule application follows a prescribed sequence where the output of one rule serves as input to another. For example, in English, the rule of flapping can be followed by voicing assimilation, where the order affects whether a flap is voiced or voiceless, showing that deviation from this order gives different results .
Sequence redundancy occurs when certain sequences of sounds within a language's phonological system are predictable and thus do not contribute new information. In English, for example, the co-occurrence of initial plosives with fricatives like "ps" or "pt" is rare, thereby making their sequences redundant because the predictability reduces the amount of distinctive or meaningful contrast within the language, leading to restrictions in phonotactic environments .
In Hungarian, voiceless stops are characterized by certain distinctive features, such as place of articulation, without a significant emphasis on aspiration as they are unaspirated. In English, voiceless stops are typically aspirated in stressed initial positions, so the feature of aspiration becomes non-redundant. The concept of redundancy indicates that certain features in English add supplementary information crucial to intelligibility, whereas Hungarian features may remain redundant because aspiration is not phonemic, indicating different levels of feature necessity across languages .
Positing abstract underlying representations is crucial as it allows for the formulation of more general phonological rules and simplifies morphophonemic alternations. In the case of Yavelmani, abstract representations help account for vowel harmony phenomena without excessively complicating the phonological system. Similarly, in Polish, underlying representations help generalize across different phonotactic contexts, enabling more systematic and predictable alternation predictions .
Language-specific redundancies are particular to an individual language's phonological system where certain features do not add phonemic differences, such as tone in English dialects where it is non-contrastive. Universal redundancies apply across languages, such as the mutual exclusivity of nasalization and voicing in certain contexts or the general avoidance of glottalization with back high vowels. These redundancies reflect constraints that are either language-specific or more universally observed, affecting phonetic inventories and phonotactic rules .
The four major phonological processes are assimilation, dissimilation, insertion (epenthesis), and deletion. Assimilation occurs when a sound changes to become more like a neighboring sound, such as nasal assimilation where a nasal sound becomes more similar to an adjacent sound. Dissimilation involves a change making a sound less like a neighboring sound, such as when a repeated consonant changes to avoid similarity. Insertion, or epenthesis, adds a segment into a word. For example, a vowel may be inserted for phonotactic reasons as in the insertion of a schwa in 'film' . Deletion is the removal of a segment, like in syncope or apocope where vowels or consonants are omitted .
Parenthesis notation in phonological rules indicates optionality of segments within the phonological process structure, such as in English plural formation rules where the plural morpheme may optionally adapt to a preceding voiced segment, becoming a voiced instead of voiceless sound. Brace notation is used to indicate alternatives within phonological rules, like choosing between different morphophonemic environments where specific allophones may surface, for example in variations of plural formation for different allophones depending on the environment .
Neutralization occurs when distinct phonemes lose their distinctiveness in certain phonological contexts. For instance, in English, the voiceless stops /t/ and /d/ can become indistinct at word-final positions such as in the word 'put' where /t/ can lose its release. In Korean, stop nasalization is an example of neutralization where a voiceless stop becomes a nasal sound in certain contexts, effectively losing its stop quality and becoming indistinguishable in those positions .