The Importance of Family Communication Pattern in Mental Health of
Senior High School
Enna Janine C. Cabaya
Bon Carlo D. Calledo
Lloyd Austin C. Cantomayor
Kyle David P. Ca ang
Samantha Nicole M. Damaso
Asraida Z. Abdullkarim
Sherlyn Theries Oton
Argie Diagbel
Jhinnery Ortado
Cassandra Dawn Dublin
October 28, 2025
Chapter 1
Introduction
Background of the Study
During teenage years, individuals undergo substantial changes physically,
emotionally, and mentally. Senior high school students experience lots of stress
because of school-related work, peer relationships, and personal issues. In
recent years, increasing numbers of adolescents have demonstrated anxiety and
depressive signs, especially during and following the onset of the COVID-19
pandemic, a period which contributed to additional stressors at home and at
school. Given that family is fundamental to Filipino culture, families are often the
first source of support in young people's lives. However, families are now
communicating less with one another due to busy lifestyles, financial pressures,
and excessive socialization with electronic devices. Less communication can
restrict the potential for misunderstandings and miscommunications between
parents and children.
Family communication patterns are the typical ways families communicate,
express feelings, and tackle family problems. Some families communicate freely
and actively listen to fellow member's conversations (conversation-oriented),
while others stress adherence to rules and obedience (conformity-oriented).
Research has found that relatively open and caring communication leads
adolescent children to experience a more positive emotional mood state,
whereas poor family communications can lead to negative emotions and mental
health problem. Although being family-oriented is often mentioned in the
cultural context of Filipino families, some adolescents in the Philippines also
question the distance they feel emotionally from their parents and that emotional
distance may lead to different proportions of psychological distress. There is little
research in the Philippines that examines how family communication patterns
influence the mental health of Senior high school students. This study aims to
understand the relationship between family communication patterns and mental
health, and offer schools and families possible ways to better support teenagers
in communication with family members.
Global studies have shown that family communication plays a crucial role
in adolescent mental health. A review by Zadhasa (2023) found that open and
supportive communication patterns are connected to lower levels of anxiety and
depression, while conflictual or avoidant patterns correlate with harmful
outcomes. Drawing on global research emphasizing the role of family dynamics
in adolescent mental health, this study examined the relationship between family
communication patterns and psychological well-being among Iranian
adolescents. A sample of 114 high school students from Shiraz was assessed
using the General Health Questionnaire (Goldberg, 1972) and the Family
Communication Patterns Scale (Fitzpatrick & Ritchie, 1994). Reliability was
confirmed via Cronbach’s alpha, and data were analyzed through regression and
correlation methods. Consistent with international findings, results revealed a
significant association between family communication and mental health.
Specifically, the conversation-oriented dimension was a strong predictor of
positive mental health outcomes, while the conformity-oriented dimension
showed no significant predictive value. These findings align with broader global
studies that underscore the importance of open and supportive family
communication in fostering adolescent psychological resilience.
In the Philippines, the family continues to serve as a vital support system
for adolescents, yet rapid societal changes and digital distractions have disrupted
traditional communication patterns. A study by Serrano et al. (2023) in Frontiers
in Psychiatry found that senior high school students in Metro Manila face high
risks of anxiety, depression, and stress, with social support—especially from
family and significant others—acting as a protective factor. Female students and
those with a family history of mental disorders were particularly vulnerable.
Complementing these findings, a 2023 study in BMC Public Health involving
Asian adolescents revealed that poor family communication, often compounded
by family violence and problematic internet use, significantly heightens the risk of
mental health issues. Together, these studies underscore the urgent need to
strengthen family-based communication and support systems to safeguard
adolescent mental well-being.
Although there is an expanding body of literature on adolescent mental
health, very few studies in the context of the Philippines, particularly in provincial
schools such as Notre Dame of Midsayap College, have examined the direct
impact of family communication patterns. Most of the studies have focused on
urban study populations or youth behavior in general. There is a need to examine
different family processes that might influence adolescent mental health but differ
in rural or semi-urban contexts.
The purpose of the present research is to understand how different family
communication patterns influence the mental health of senior high school
students at Notre Dame of Midsayap College. The research aims to explore how
the way families communicate with each other affects the mental health of Senior
High School student, especially in the unique settings of rural and semi-urban
communities.
Statement of the Problem
This study aims to examine the importance of family communication
patters in the mental health of the senior high school students at the Notre Dame
of Midsayap College.
Specifically, this study will aim to find answers to the following research
questions:
1. What does family communication look like for the Grade 11 HUMMS
students?
2. How does family communication pattern can affect the mental health of
the Grade 11 HUMSS students?
3. What role does family communication play in students’ ability to cope with
academic and social stress?
Significance of the Study
This research is significant for the following stakeholders:
Students: The study encourages students to consider how their communication
and relationship with family members impact their feelings, stress, and coping
mechanism.
Parents: The study provides parents with recommendation for communicating
with their children in ways that make them feel safe and supported,
demonstrating that open and caring communication can decrease stress and
increase teen emotional resilience, which parents can apply to strengthen their
relationship with their child and support their child's mental health.
Guidance Counselors: These results could inform how they improve wellness
programs and develop better mechanisms for tracking the mental health of
students.
Future Researchers: This study gives a helpful starting point for others who
want to learn more about how family relationships affect the mental health of
teenagers. It can inspire future research that looks at changes over time,
compares different places or groups, and explores the real-life experiences of
Filipino youth. Overall, it adds useful knowledge to help improve understanding of
mental health and family life.
Review of Related Literature
Importance of Family Communication Patterns in the Mental Health of
Senior High School Students
The family serves as the first socializing agent for adolescents, shaping
their emotional, cognitive, and behavioral development. Among the various
aspects of family life, communication patterns are recognized as one of the most
critical determinants of adolescents’ mental health. Communication is the
medium through which family members express emotions, share values, and
resolve conflicts, making it central to the maintenance of healthy family
relationships. For senior high school students, who are navigating a period of
rapid change, family communication plays a pivotal role in shaping their coping
mechanisms and overall mental well-being.
Family Communication Patterns (FCP) theory, developed by Koerner and
Fitzpatrick (2002), provides a valuable framework for understanding how family
interaction styles influence adolescent outcomes. The theory identifies two
dimensions of family communication: conversation orientation and conformity
orientation. Families high in conversation orientation emphasize open dialogue,
encourage the free exchange of ideas, and allow children to express their
emotions. This type of environment fosters adolescents’ autonomy, critical
thinking, and emotional regulation. In contrast, families high in conformity
orientation stress obedience, hierarchical authority, and uniformity, often leading
to adolescents’ internalized distress and limited emotional expression.
Recent empirical studies highlight the impact of family communication on
adolescents’ psychological well-being. Zhou et al. (2023) found that restrictive
communication patterns were strongly correlated with depressive symptoms
among adolescents, with feelings of being unloved and hopelessness emerging
as particularly robust indicators of distress. Similarly, a systematic review by Zapf
et al. (2023) concluded that adolescents who reported higher quality
communication with their parents consistently showed better mental health
outcomes, including reduced anxiety and improved emotional resilience.
The protective role of open communication has also been observed in
studies focusing on stress and coping. Huang et al. (2022) noted that
adolescents in families characterized by open and supportive communication
were more likely to engage in healthy coping mechanisms when facing academic
pressures or social conflicts. Such adolescents reported higher levels of
resilience and self-esteem, as well as fewer symptoms of depression.
Conversely, adolescents who experienced poor communication at home were
more prone to maladaptive coping strategies, including social withdrawal and
substance [Link] mechanisms through which family communication affects
adolescent mental health have been studied extensively. Open communication
fosters emotional validation, wherein adolescents feel heard, understood, and
supported by their parents. This process reduces the risks of rumination, social
isolation, and internalizing symptoms (Koerner & Fitzpatrick, 2002). Moreover,
effective communication facilitates self-disclosure, enabling adolescents to seek
help and guidance when they encounter stressors. Zhou et al. (2023)
further highlighted that adolescents who perceived their parents as
emotionally responsive demonstrated better mental health than those who
described their families as emotionally distant or critical.
For senior high school students, the balance between autonomy and
parental guidance is particularly critical. Families that foster high levels of
conversation orientation while maintaining moderate conformity provide
adolescents with the freedom to express themselves within a supportive
structure. This balance has been associated with better academic performance,
improved emotional well-being, and lower risks of depression and anxiety (Zapf
et al., 2023). In contrast, overly restrictive communication can undermine
adolescents’ identity formation, increase internalized pressures, and heighten
vulnerability to mental health problems.
Furthermore, the importance of family communication patterns extends
beyond individual emotional outcomes, influencing broader social and behavioral
domains. Research has shown that adolescents who experience supportive
family communication are less likely to engage in risky behaviors, such as
substance abuse, delinquency, and excessive internet use, all of which are
correlated with poor mental health (Huang et al., 2023). Open communication
also strengthens family cohesion, providing a stable foundation for adolescents
to navigate challenges in school and society.
In conclusion, the literature provides compelling evidence that family
communication patterns significantly affect the mental health of senior high
school students. Open and supportive communication fosters emotional well-
being, resilience, and adaptive coping strategies, whereas restrictive and hostile
communication increases risks of depression, anxiety, and maladaptive
behaviors. These findings highlight the need for educationa institutions and
mental health practitioners to incorporate family-based interventions in their
programs to promote holistic adolescent development.
Family Communication Patterns and Their Influence on the Mental Health
of Senior High School Students
The literature strongly agrees that family communication patterns are a
crucial factor influencing the mental health of adolescents, particularly senior high
school students who are undergoing one of the most emotionally and
academically demanding phases of development. Healthy communication within
the family creates a supportive climate where adolescents can openly express
emotions, seek guidance, and receive validation, which in turn reduces the
likelihood of anxiety, depression, and psychological distress (Koerner &
Fitzpatrick, 2002; Zapf et al., 2023). According to Family Communication
Patterns Theory, conversation-oriented families encourage emotional sharing
and open dialogue, helping adolescents develop stronger coping skills and
emotional resilience. In contrast, conformity-oriented communication prioritizes
obedience, silence, and authority, which may discourage adolescents from
voicing their struggles and can result in emotional suppression, leading to poorer
mental health outcomes (Koerner & Fitzpatrick, 2002).
Several studies provide evidence that communication quality at home
directly shapes adolescent mental health. Zapf et al. (2023) emphasized that
adolescents who experience supportive communication from parents are less
likely to develop depression and suicidal ideation. When communication is
absent, hostile, or critical, adolescents often feel rejected or misunderstood,
which increases internalizing symptoms. In the same way, Huang et al. (2022)
revealed that strong family functioning — including warmth, emotional
responsiveness, and consistent communication — acts as a protective factor
against depression, while poor communication increases emotional insecurity
and vulnerability to mental health disorders (Huang et al., 2023). These findings
support the idea that home interactions are not neutral; they either serve as
emotional safety nets or stressors.
This pattern is especially relevant for senior high school students, who
face numerous stressors such as academic pressure, changing social identities,
and preparation for adulthood. Studies show that when students navigate these
stressors without supportive communication at home, they become more prone
to anxiety, stress, and depressive symptoms (Cebu, 2023; Tus, 2020). Zhou et
al. (2023) further demonstrated that adolescents who feel emotionally neglected
or unheard by their parents develop stronger feelings of loneliness and
hopelessness — powerful predictors of depression. Conversely, when
adolescents feel listened to, validated, and guided, they report higher
psychological well-being, better self-esteem, and improved academic adjustment
(Zapf et al., 2023). This implies that family communication is not only emotionally
protective but also connected to better functioning in school, where mental health
and academic success are deeply intertwined.
Overall, the literature converges on the conclusion that family
communication patterns play a decisive role in protecting or harming the mental
health of senior high school students. Open, supportive, and empathetic
communication fosters resilience, emotional stability, and positive coping, while
neglectful, authoritarian, or conflict-ridden communication patterns heighten the
risk of anxiety, depression, and suicidal thoughts. Therefore, strengthening
communication between parents and adolescents is essential in promoting
mental well-being. In the context of senior high school students — who are
particularly vulnerable to emotional distress — improving family communication
patterns should be viewed as a vital strategy for mental-health prevention and
intervention.
Academic Stress and Its Influence on the Mental Health of Senior High
School Students
Academic stress is one of the most critical determinants of adolescent
mental health in the senior high school stage, where students are confronted with
heavy academic workloads, high-stakes examinations, strict performance
standards, and pressure to meet expectations from both school and home.
Ghatol (2017) emphasized that senior high school students often experience
intense academic pressure due to continuous assessments, overwhelming tasks,
and competition in academic environments. These academic demands can push
students beyond their coping thresholds, increasing their risk of anxiety,
emotional exhaustion, and psychological distress.
In the Philippine context, Cebu (2023) found that academic-related
pressures significantly contribute to stress, anxiety, and suicidal ideation among
senior high school students. The study highlights that students who are exposed
to unrelenting academic stress without emotional support from parents or
teachers are more susceptible to negative cognitive and emotional outcomes.
Similarly, Tus (2020) revealed that academic stress can weaken intrinsic
motivation and lead to declining academic performance, which in turn worsens
students’ self-esteem and emotional stability. This negative cycle underscores
how academic stress becomes both a cause and result of mental health strain
among adolescents.
However, research consistently shows that academic stress does not
operate alone—it is closely influenced by the home atmosphere and patterns of
family communication. Bandhana and Sharma (2010) noted that a supportive
home environment, particularly one grounded in open communication, can
significantly reduce students’ academic stress levels. When parents actively
listen, validate their child’s emotions, and engage in positive communication,
students feel safer expressing their academic struggles, allowing them to develop
healthier coping mechanisms. In contrast, homes characterized by criticism,
conflict, or emotional neglect heighten students’ academic pressure, leading to
feelings of isolation, self-doubt, and hopelessness.
These findings align strongly with research on family communication
patterns. Zhou et al. (2023) revealed that adolescents who perceive
communication at home as cold, critical, or unresponsive report higher rates of
depressive symptoms, particularly when academic stress is present. Poor
communication amplifies stress by creating emotional barriers between students
and their parents, depriving them of one of the most important protective factors
during periods of academic difficulty: emotional support. Conversely, open,
warm, and frequent communication promotes emotional resilience, better stress
regulation, and improved mental well-being (Koerner & Fitzpatrick, 2002).
Academic stress therefore becomes a trigger, while family communication
patterns act as a moderator of mental health outcomes. When students are able
to communicate their fears and burdens to their parents, the emotional load of
academic pressure becomes more manageable. This buffering effect is critical
because adolescence is a period when individuals are still developing emotional
regulation skills and rely heavily on their families as their primary support system.
Zapf et al. (2023) further emphasized that parent–child communication quality is
one of the strongest predictors of adolescent mental health, demonstrating its
significance in reducing the psychological burden of school-related stress.
Overall, the literature shows that academic stress is a major contributor to
adolescent mental health problems, but its impact significantly depends on the
presence or absence of healthy family communication patterns. Open,
empathetic, and supportive communication within the family not only reduces
stress but helps students build resilience, enhancing their capacity to cope with
academic challenges. Thus, understanding academic stress within the context of
family communication provides a deeper explanation of why some senior high
school students thrive while others develop mental health difficulties under the
same academic conditions.
Chapter 2
Methodology
This chapter presents the research methods and procedures employed in
investigating the importance of family communication patterns in the mental health of
senior high school students. It describes the research design, research environment,
role of the researchers, participants, data collection methods, data analysis, and the
strategies urtaken to ensure trustworthiness, dependability, and adherence to ethical
considerations.
Research Design
This study employed a qualitative research design, specifically a
phenomenological approach, to explore and understand the lived experiences of senior
high school students regarding family communication patterns and how it can affect their
mental health. The phenomenological approach was chosen because it seeks to capture
the essence of personal experiences, giving voice to students’ perspectives on how
family communication patterns can affect their emotional well-being, coping strategies,
and overall mental health.
Role of the Researchers
In this study, the researchers play an important role in gathering and
understanding the data. They act as interviewers who guide the conversations and
ensure that participants feel safe and respected while sharing their experiences. The
researchers remain neutral by avoiding personal opinions, listening carefully, and asking
follow-up questions when needed. After the interviews, they are responsible for writing
down the answers, organizing the information, and identifying common themes. All of
this is done while protecting the participants’ privacy and well-being.
Research Environment
The study will be in Notre Dame of Midsayap College, located in
Poblacion 5, Midsayap, North Cotabato. The Notre Dame of Midsayap College is
selected as the research site because it provides a supportive environment for
exploring issues concerning the mental health of senior high school students.
The school also implements programs that emphasize psychosocial support,
making it an appropriate setting for gathering meaningful insights into the topic.
Participants
The participants of this study are Grade 11 HUMSS students enrolled in
the academic year 2025–2026. Purposive sampling is used to identify students
who meet the following criteria:
(a) currently enroll in the senior high school program,
(b) reside with their families, and
(c) are willing to share their experiences about family communication patterns
and mental health. A total of 3 students are selected to participate. Diversity in
terms of strand, sex, and family background is ensured to capture a wide range
of perspectives.
Data Collection Methods
Data are collected through semi-structured interviews. An interview guide
is prepared, focusing on questions related to family communication patterns,
emotional support within the household, conflict management, and the perceived
effects of these patterns on students’ mental health. This method allows flexibility
for probing questions, enabling participants to elaborate on their personal
experiences and provide deeper insights.
To establish trustworthiness, pilot interviews are conducted to refine the interview
guide. All interviews are audio-recorded (with consent) and transcribed verbatim
for analysis. Field notes are also taken to capture non-verbal cues and contextual
details during the interview sessions.
Data Analysis
The study employs thematic analysis to interpret the qualitative data.
Following Braun and Clarke’s (2006) six-step process, the researchers familiarize
themselves with the transcripts, generate initial codes, search for recurring
patterns, review themes, define and name themes, and produce a coherent
report. This systematic analysis allows the researchers to identify commonalities
and differences in participants’ experiences, particularly how family
communication patterns influence their mental health
Trustworthiness of the Study
To make sure that this study is trustworthy and accurately reflects the
experiences of senior high school students, four important criteria were followed:
credibility, confirmability, transferability, and dependability. These served as the
foundation in ensuring that the voices of the participants were presented truthfully
and fairly.
Credibility.
Credibility was achieved by being faithful to the students’ actual
experiences and perspectives. During the interviews, the researchers carefully
listened and avoided making assumptions or rushing into conclusions. To
double-check the accuracy of the data, participants were given the chance to
review their answers through member checking. Triangulation was also done by
combining interview transcripts, researchers’ field notes, and peer debriefing,
which added depth and reliability to the findings.
Confirmability.
Confirmability focused on making sure that the results were based on the
students’ stories and not influenced by the researchers’ personal views. To do
this, the researchers wrote reflective notes after each interview, recorded all
sessions, and created verbatim transcripts. This process ensured that the
findings truly came from the participants themselves, not from outside biases.
Transferability.
Transferability was ensured by providing rich descriptions of the
participants, their family communication patterns, and the school environment. By
giving detailed accounts, readers and future researchers can decide if the results
of this study can also apply to other students in similar situations.
Dependability.
Dependability was established by making the research process consistent
and well-documented. From how participants were chosen to how the data was
analyzed, every step was recorded in an audit trail. This clear documentation,
along with peer checking, guarantees that the process can be repeated and
would still produce similar findings.
Ethical Considerations
The researcher will obtain authorization from the school administration
and secure informed consent from all participants. Confidentiality and anonymity
will be upheld, and participants may withdraw from the study at any time without
consequences. All audio recordings will be stored safely and will be permanently
deleted once the analysis is completed.
References
Cebu, J. C. (2023). Depression, anxiety and stress as predictors of suicidal
ideation among senior high school students. International Journal of Recent
Advances in Multidisciplinary Topics, 4(1), 1–14.
Huang, X., et al. (2022). Family functioning as a protective factor for adolescent
depression: Implications for prevention. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 859203.
[Link]
Huang, X., et al. (2023). Family communication, family violence, and adolescent
anxiety and depression: Structural equation modeling. BMC Public Health, 23(1),
1542. [Link]
Koerner, A. F., & Fitzpatrick, M. A. (2002). Toward a theory of family
communication. Communication Theory, 12(1), 70–91.
[Link]
Tus, J. (2020). The link between academic stress and students’ achievement.
Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 8(11), 29–37.
Zapf, H., et al. (2023). Parent–child communication quality and adolescent
mental health: A systematic review. Journal of Adolescence, 96, 25–37.
[Link]
Zhou, H. Y., et al. (2023). Feeling unloved is the most robust sign of adolescent
depression: Network analysis linking family communication patterns and
depressive symptoms. Journal of Affective Disorders, 335, 129–138.
[Link]
Zhou, H. Y., et al. (2023). Feeling unloved as a sign of adolescent depression.
Journal of Affective Disorders, 335, 129–138.
Bandhana, D., & Sharma, D. P. (2010). Home environment, mental health and
academic achievement among higher secondary school students. Journal of
Education and Practice, 1(1), 1–7.
Cebu, J. C. (2023). Depression, anxiety and stress as predictors of suicidal
ideation among senior high school students. International Journal of Recent
Advances in Multidisciplinary Topics, 4(1), 1–14.
Ghatol, S. D. (2017). Academic stress among higher secondary school students:
A review. International Journal of Advanced Research in Education &
Technology, 4(1), 38–41.
Koerner, A. F., & Fitzpatrick, M. A. (2002). Toward a theory of family
communication. Communication Theory, 12(1), 70–91.
Tus, J. (2020). The link between academic stress, academic motivation, and
senior high school students’ academic achievement. Asian Journal of
Multidisciplinary Studies, 8(11), 29–37.
Zapf, H., et al. (2023). Parent–child communication quality and adolescent
mental health: A systematic review. Journal of Adolescence, 96, 25–37.
Zhou, H. Y., et al. (2023). Feeling unloved is the most robust sign of adolescent
depression: Network analysis linking family communication patterns and
depressive symptoms. Journal of Affective Disorders, 335, 129–138.