EFFECTS OF BREASTFEEDING TO MOTHER AND CHILD TATARA VILLAGE

CHAPTER ONE

INTRODUCTION

1.1. Background of the Study

Breastfeeding benefits for newborns and infants are well-documented. Breastfeeding provides
infants with superior nutritional content that is capable of improving infant immunity and
possible reduction in future health care spending. At the Innocent Declaration in 1990, the
WHO/UNICEF called for policies that would cultivate a breastfeeding culture that encourages
women to breastfeed their children exclusively for the first 6 months of life and then up to 2
years of age and beyond . However, a recent estimate by the WHO showed that worldwide only
35% of children between birth and their 5th month are breastfed exclusively. Based on the WHO
Global data on Infant and Young Child Feeding in Nigeria, 22.3% of children were exclusively
breastfed for less than 4 months, while 17.2% were exclusively breastfed for less than 6 months,
in the year 2003. According to the Nigerian Demographic and Health Survey (NDHS), in 2008
17% of children were exclusively breastfed for less than 4 months, while 13% were exclusively
breastfed for less than 6 months. The median exclusive breastfeeding period in Southwest
Nigeria by months in the year 2003 was 7 months. In the year 2008, it was 6 months. Within the
same period, early initiation of breastfeeding among women in the region was 12.7% in 2003,
but increased to 35.5% in the year 2008 [6]. All these figures are far below the 90% level
recommended by the WHO .Child mortality remains high in low and middle-income countries.
Nigeria has the highest under-five rural mortality rate of 242.7 per 1,000 among selected sub-
Saharan Africa countries. Successful breastfeeding is crucial to the curbing of infant malnutrition
and achieving the millennium development goals four [reducing child mortality] and five
[improving maternal health]. Based on available evidence, achievements of both goals are still
far from the desired progress. Breastfeeding practices, including initiation and duration, are
influenced by multiple interwoven factors which include health, psychosocial, cultural, political,
and economic factors.

Among these factors, decisions regarding initiation and duration of breastfeeding in low-income
countries are influenced by education, employment, place of delivery, family pressure, and
cultural values. In Nigeria, while breastfeeding initiation is on the increase, the duration, and
practice of exclusive breastfeeding among women who had their delivery in a health facility, and
outside such facility, has remained low. The early introduction of complementary feeding, based
on erroneous assumptions, affects breastfeeding initiation and sustainability. Among the Yoruba
people, a common belief around infant feeding is that exclusive breastfeeding is beneficial to
both infants and mothers, but complementary feeding is essential for babies to adapt to other
meals with ease [.Besides normative expectations, personal experiences and networks of support
have influence on the forms and quality of breastfeeding practices. Largely, these factors exert
pressure on breastfeeding mothers thereby making their experience pleasurable or painful within
time and space as an embodied experience, breastfeeding practices and experiences are context
bound and culture dependent. Despite the available body of knowledge on breastfeeding
practices in Nigeria, studies interrogating the agency of breastfeeding mothers as lived within
their socio-cultural context are limited. Earlier, Spencer argued that exploring mothers'
breastfeeding experiences as defined within a social context could reveal the inherent
complexities mitigating the successfully promotion of sustainable breastfeeding practices .
Similarly, Oweis, Tayem, and Froelicher decried the inadequacy of studies investigating
breastfeeding mothers' perspectives on breastfeeding barriers and promoting healthy
breastfeeding practices. Hence, this study adopts a mixed method design in exploring nursing
mothers' breastfeeding practices, beliefs, experiences, and constraints to exclusive breastfeeding.
The experiences and views of breastfeeding mothers were complemented with that of
grandmothers and nurses. Grandmothers are an important source of support for new mothers.
Based on their roles, their infant feeding experience and knowledge can influence mothers'
decisions to initiate and continue breastfeeding.

Childhood obesity has reached epidemic proportions. There is increasing attention to the topic of
prevention and continued debate as to whether breastfeeding (BF) is protective against childhood
obesity. Previous systematic reviews on this topic were done in 2005 showing that BF was
protective against childhood obesity but, because of confounding variables, the evidence was
weak. To explore the current evidence of the effect of BF on childhood obesity and provide
recommendations for the nurse practitioner (NP) as a primary care provider
A systematic review of the literature from 1/2005 to 3/2012 was done to assess the evidence on
the relationship between BF and childhood obesity. The majority of studies identified in this
article showed a relationship between BF and obesity prevention, but because of confounding
maternal, child, cultural, genetic, and environmental variables, the relationship remains unclear.

While it is possible that there are protective benefits of BF on childhood obesity, it is difficult to
prove because of confounding variables. However, because of other benefits for the mother and
child, BF should be encouraged. Whether obesity in childhood can be prevented by BF remains
unclear. Further research controlling for confounding variables is needed to provide concrete
given the recognized benefits of breastfeeding for the health of the mother and infants, the World
Health Organization (WHO) recommends exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) for the first six months
of life. However, the prevalence of EBF is low globally in many of the developing and
developed countries around the world. There is much interest in the effectiveness of
breastfeeding promotion interventions on breastfeeding rates in early infancy.

A systematic literature was conducted to identify all studies that evaluated the impact of
breastfeeding promotional strategies on any breastfeeding and EBF rates at 4-6 weeks and at 6
months. Data were abstracted into a standard excel sheet by two authors. Meta-analyses were
performed with different sub-group analyses. The overall evidence were graded according to the
Child Health Epidemiology Reference Group (CHERG) rules using the adapted Grading of
Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria and
recommendations made from developing country studies for inclusion into the Live Saved Tool

(LiST) model. After reviewing 968 abstracts, 268 studies were selected for potential inclusion, of
which 53 randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials were selected for full abstraction.
Thirty two studies gave the outcome of EBF at 4-6 weeks postpartum. There was a statistically
significant 43% increase in this outcome, with 89% and 20% significant increases in developing
and developed countries respectively. Fifteen studies reported EBF outcomes at 6 months. There
was an overall 137% increase, with a significant 6 times increase in EBF in developing
countries, compared to 1.3 folds increase in developed country studies. Further sub-group
analyses proved that prenatal counseling had a significant impact on breastfeeding outcomes at
4-6 weeks, while both prenatal and postnatal counseling were important for EBF at 6 months.
Breastfeeding promotion interventions increased exclusive and any breastfeeding rates at 4-6
weeks and at 6 months. A relatively greater impact of these interventions was seen in developing
countries with 1.89 and 6 folds increase in EBF rates at 4-6 weeks and at 6 months respectively.

Breastfeeding, variously known as chestfeeding or nursing, is the process where breast milk is
fed to a child. Breast milk may be from the breast, or may be pumped and fed to the infant.
The World Health Organization (WHO) recommend that breastfeeding begin within the first
hour of a baby's birth and continue as the baby wants. Health organizations, including the WHO,
recommend breastfeeding exclusively for six months. This means that no other foods or drinks,
other than vitamin D, are typically given. The WHO recommends exclusive breastfeeding for the
first 6 months of life, followed by continued breastfeeding with appropriate complementary
foods for up to 2 years and beyond Of the 135 million babies born every year, only 42% are
breastfed within the first hour of life, only 38% of mothers practice exclusive breastfeeding
during the first six months, and 58% of mothers continue breastfeeding up to the age of two
years and beyond. Breastfeeding has a number of benefits to both mother and baby that infant
formula lacks. Increased breastfeeding to near-universal levels in low and medium income
countries could prevent approximately 820,000 deaths of children under the age of five annually.
Breastfeeding decreases the risk of respiratory tract infections, ear infections, sudden infant death
syndrome (SIDS), and diarrhea for the baby, both in developing and developed countries. Other
benefits have been proposed to improve lower risk of asthma, food allergies,
and diabetes. Breastfeeding may also improve cognitive development and decrease the risk
of obesity in adulthood.

Benefits for the mother include less blood loss following delivery, better contraction of the
uterus, and a decreased risk of postpartum depression. Breastfeeding delays the return
of menstruation, and in very specific circumstances, fertility, a phenomenon known as lactational
amenorrhea. Long-term benefits for the mother include decreased risk of breast
cancer, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, metabolic syndrome, and rheumatoid arthritis:

Breastfeeding is less expensive than infant formula but its impact on mothers' ability to earn an
income is not usually factored into calculations comparing the two feeding methods. It is also
common for women to experience generally manageable symptoms such as; vaginal dryness, De
Quervain syndrome, cramping, mastitis, moderate to severe nipple pain and a general lack of
bodily autonomy. These symptoms generally peak at the start of breastfeeding but disappear or
become considerately more manageable after the first few weeks.

Feedings may last as long as 30–60 minutes each as milk supply develops and the infant learns
the Suck-Swallow-Breathe pattern. 50–51. However, as milk supply increases and the infant
becomes more efficient at feeding, the duration of feeds may shorten. Older children may feed
less often. When direct breastfeeding is not possible, expressing or pumping to empty the breasts
can help mothers avoid plugged milk ducts and breast infection, maintain their milk supply,
resolve engorgement, and provide milk to be fed to their infant at a later time. Medical
conditions that do not allow breastfeeding are rare. Mothers who take certain recreational drugs
should not breastfeed, however, most medications are compatible with breastfeeding. Current
evidence indicates that it is unlikely that COVID-19 can be transmitted through breast
milk. Smoking tobacco and consuming limited amounts of alcohol and/or coffee are not reason
to avoid breastfeeding.

1.2. Statement of the Problem

Breastfeeding has long been recognized as a fundamental aspect of child and maternal health. It
is universally acknowledged by global health authorities such as the World Health Organization
(WHO) and the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) as the ideal method of feeding
infants, especially during the first six months of life. Despite its well-documented benefits to
both mother and child, breastfeeding practices remain suboptimal in many parts of the world,
particularly in developing countries like Nigeria. The inconsistency in breastfeeding practices
and the lack of widespread understanding about its full benefits pose significant challenges to
maternal and child health outcomes (WHO, 2020).

The problem is compounded by a range of socio-economic, cultural, and health-related factors

that either promote or hinder effective breastfeeding. In Nigeria, although awareness about
breastfeeding exists, practices such as exclusive breastfeeding for the first six months are often
not adhered to. The Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey (NDHS, 2018) reported that only
about 29% of infants under six months are exclusively breastfed, far below the global target of
50%. This indicates a gap between knowledge and practice, which may be attributed to factors
such as maternal employment, societal myths, poor lactation support, and lack of education on
breastfeeding techniques.

Furthermore, while numerous studies have focused on the health benefits of breastfeeding for the
child—such as immunity development, prevention of malnutrition, and reduced infant mortality
—less attention has been given to the effects on mothers. Benefits to mothers include reduced
risk of postpartum hemorrhage, lower chances of developing breast and ovarian cancer, natural
child spacing due to lactational amenorrhea, and psychological satisfaction (Victora et al., 2016).
Yet, many mothers are unaware of these advantages, and healthcare systems in some regions fail
to provide adequate support or education on the matter.

Another pressing issue is the influence of modernization, urbanization, and the aggressive
marketing of infant formula, which further undermines breastfeeding efforts. Many mothers,
especially in urban areas, opt for formula feeding due to convenience, perceived social status, or
misinformation, not realizing the long-term implications for both themselves and their children.
Moreover, returning to work shortly after childbirth often disrupts breastfeeding patterns,
especially in workplaces without breastfeeding-friendly policies or maternity leave extensions
(Ogbo et al., 2017).

Inadequate policy implementation, weak healthcare delivery systems, and poor community-level
support for breastfeeding mothers continue to widen the gap between breastfeeding intentions
and practice. These systemic problems point to the need for a thorough investigation into the
effects of breastfeeding on both mother and child in order to inform policies, increase public
awareness, and strengthen support systems.

Given this background, this study seeks to explore in detail the multiple effects of breastfeeding
on both the mother and the child. It aims to fill the knowledge gap regarding the dual benefits of
breastfeeding and to examine the barriers that prevent optimal breastfeeding practices, especially
within local communities. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for improving maternal and
child health outcomes and for achieving Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) related to
health and well-being.
1.3. Aim and Objectives of the Study

AIM

Breastfeeding protects against diarrhoea and common childhood illnesses such as pneumonia,
and may also have longer-term health benefits for the mother and child, such as reducing the risk
of overweight and obesity in childhood and adolescence. Exclusive breastfeeding means that the
infant receives only breast milk.

Objectives.

General Objective;

Breastmilk provides all the energy and nutrients that the infant needs for the first months of life,
and it continues to provide up to half or more of a child's nutritional needs during the second half
of the first year, and up to one third during the second year of life.

Specific objectives of study;

i. To know the effect of exclusive breastfeeding on children in Tatara village

ii. To know the level of awareness of mothers in Tatara village on exclusive breastfeeding.

iii. To know the level of practice of exclusive breastfeeding in Tatara village

1.4. Research Question

Here are some research question

i. What is the effects of exclusive breastfeeding on the nutritional status and growth of
preterm infants?

ii. What are the challenges of exclusive breastfeeding among nursing mother?

iii. Does exclusive breastfeeding for six months reduced the risk of diarrhea and
gastrointestinal infections in infants?

iv. What is the impact of exclusive breastfeeding on cognitive development and motor skills
in infants up to 12 months?
1.5. Research Hypothesis

The study was based on the hypothesis that exclusively breastfed children demonstrate better
growth and are less stunted than those who are not exclusively breastfed for the first 6 months of
life.

1.6. Scope and Limitations of the Study

This study address the effect of exclusive breastfeeding on mother to child in Tatara village Karu
LGA of Nasarawa state, simply because exclusive breastfeeding is important to children of 0-6
months of birth. The reason been that Karu LGA Nasarawa state is indeed broad and this piece of
work can not cover it all.

1.7. Significances of the Study

"This study on the effect of exclusive breastfeeding on mother-to-child outcomes is significant

because:

Improved maternal health: Understanding the effects of exclusive breastfeeding on maternal

health can lead to better postpartum care and reduced morbidity.

Enhanced child development: Identifying the benefits of exclusive breastfeeding for child
development can inform strategies to optimize cognitive, emotional, and physical growth.

Reduced infant mortality: Uncovering the relationship between exclusive breastfeeding and
infant mortality can guide interventions to reduce mortality rates.

Informing public health policies: Study findings can shape policies and programs promoting
exclusive breastfeeding, enhancing national and global health initiatives.

Empowering mothers: By highlighting the importance of exclusive breastfeeding, mothers can

make informed decisions about their reproductive health and childcare practices.

Reducing healthcare costs: By preventing diseases and promoting health, exclusive breastfeeding
can lead to reduced healthcare expenditures.
Contributing to global health goals: This study aligns with the United Nations' Sustainable
Development Goals (SDGs), particularly SDG 3 (Good Health and Well-being)

1.8 Definition of Terms

Exclusive Breastfeeding: According to the World Health Organization (WHO, 2020), exclusive
breastfeeding is defined as feeding an infant only breast milk for the first six months of life,
without giving any other food or drink, not even water, except for oral rehydration solutions, or
drops/syrups of vitamins, minerals, or medicines.

Breastfeeding: According to Lawrence and Lawrence (2016), breastfeeding is the process by

which an infant receives milk directly from the mother’s breast. It is also referred to as nursing or
chestfeeding in some contexts.

Health: The World Health Organization (1948) defines health as “a state of complete physical,
mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity.”

Health Education: WHO (2012) defines health education as “any combination of learning
experiences designed to help individuals and communities improve their health by increasing
their knowledge or influencing their attitudes.” It goes beyond imparting knowledge and aims at
behavior change and health improvement.

Patient: According to the U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS, 2010), a
patient is “an individual who is receiving needed professional services that are directed by a
licensed practitioner of the healing arts toward maintenance, improvement or protection of health
or lessening of illness, disability or pain.”

Client: As defined by Kotler and Keller (2016), a client is “an individual or organization that
purchases or uses professional services or products offered by a business entity.” In healthcare
and counseling contexts, it typically refers to a person receiving care or consultation.

Care: According to Oxford English Dictionary (2020), care refers to “the provision of what is
necessary for the health, welfare, maintenance, and protection of someone or something.”

CHAPTER TWO

LITERATURE REVIEW

2.1. Introduction

In this section, the focus will be on three essential elements of the research: the conceptual
framework, the theoretical framework, and the empirical study. These elements are
foundational in shaping the understanding of the research topic and guiding the entire study. The
conceptual framework provides a clear and logical structure for how various concepts are
interrelated, enabling a deeper understanding of the research focus. The theoretical framework
draws upon existing theories to explain the phenomena being studied, offering a robust basis for
hypotheses and predictions. Finally, the empirical study explores the practical evidence
gathered from real-world observations or experiments, providing insights into the actual
outcomes or effects of the phenomenon under investigation.

2.2. Conceptual Framework

The conceptual framework serves as a roadmap for the research, visually and logically
illustrating how different concepts and variables are connected to one another. In the context of
breastfeeding, it involves the identification of key concepts that affect breastfeeding practices,
outcomes, and experiences. These concepts may include infant health, maternal health, socio-
economic factors, healthcare systems, and cultural norms. By examining how these concepts
interact, the conceptual framework helps provide a structured understanding of the dynamics at
play in the process of breastfeeding.

The World Health Organization (WHO) plays a critical role in guiding global breastfeeding
practices, with its recommendation that infants should be exclusively breastfed for the first six
months of life to achieve optimal growth, development, and health. According to WHO,
exclusive breastfeeding means that a baby receives only breast milk—no other liquids or solids
are given, except for prescribed medicines or vitamin and mineral supplements. This
recommendation is grounded in substantial scientific evidence that shows the numerous health
benefits of breastfeeding for both infants and mothers. These benefits include nutritional
advantages, enhanced immune function, emotional bonding, and reduced risk of chronic illnesses
for both parties.

The conceptual framework in this study draws upon the WHO’s recommendation and positions
exclusive breastfeeding as a central focus, linking it with various maternal and infant outcomes.
The framework explores how factors such as maternal education, support systems, cultural
practices, and healthcare access influence the practice of exclusive breastfeeding. Additionally, it
investigates the health outcomes associated with breastfeeding, such as the reduced risk of
infections, allergies, and diseases for the child, and the lower incidence of maternal postpartum
depression, obesity, and breast cancer.

By aligning with WHO guidelines and incorporating various social, cultural, and health-related
variables, the conceptual framework provides a comprehensive lens through which the practice
and impact of breastfeeding can be examined. It sets the stage for further analysis by considering
the different factors that contribute to or hinder the practice of exclusive breastfeeding, offering
insights into how these elements work together to shape maternal and child health.

2.2.1. Concept of Breastfeeding

Breastfeeding has long been regarded as the natural and preferred way to nourish an infant. For
centuries, this process involved a mother directly feeding her baby from her breast, providing not
only essential nutrition but also emotional comfort and bonding. However, with the advent of
modern technology, such as high-efficiency breast pumps, alternatives have emerged. These
alternatives allow mothers to express milk and store it for later use. As a result, mothers can now
feed their infants with their own breast milk from a cup or bottle, even if they are separated for a
period of time. This flexibility has made breastfeeding more accessible, especially in situations
where direct nursing is not possible.

The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) firmly advocates for breastfeeding as the best
nutritional option for infants. Human breast milk is the preferred food for all babies, including
premature and sick infants, with very few exceptions. It provides a unique combination of
nutrients, vitamins, and minerals that support a baby’s growth and development in ways that
formula cannot replicate. Importantly, breast milk is also considered the food least likely to cause
allergic reactions. This makes breastfeeding a highly effective way to minimize the risk of
allergies in the early stages of life.

One of the greatest benefits of breastfeeding is its availability. Unlike formula, which requires
preparation and may not always be available when needed, breast milk is ready to be used at any
time. It is always the right temperature, and mothers can breastfeed whenever and wherever their
baby needs to eat. This is particularly important for the convenience of both the mother and
child, especially during nighttime feeds or when traveling.
Another critical advantage of breastfeeding is the presence of antibodies and immune cells in the
breast milk. These elements help strengthen the infant’s immune system, providing protection
against infections and illnesses. Studies have shown that breastfed babies are less likely to suffer
from conditions such as respiratory infections, gastrointestinal diseases, and ear infections. The
mother’s body naturally produces antibodies in response to environmental exposures, and these
are passed on to the baby through the breast milk, offering passive immunity.

Breastfeeding typically begins within minutes after birth. While some babies may initially take
only a few gentle licks or sucks before pausing, most will begin to nurse more effectively within
a short period. For the first few hours—or even the first few days—babies often exhibit a pattern
of frequent bursts of sucking interrupted by short pauses. This early pattern of feeding helps
establish the mother’s milk supply and encourages the infant to latch properly, both of which are
essential for successful breastfeeding.

Thus, breastfeeding is much more than just a way to feed a baby. It is an essential practice that
supports both the physical and emotional well-being of the child and mother. With the support of
modern technology and medical advice, breastfeeding has evolved to become a flexible,
accessible, and highly beneficial practice that continues to be the gold standard for infant
nutrition.

2.2.2. Physiology of Breastfeeding

Once the alveolar epithelial cells have developed into lactocytes around mid-pregnancy, they are
able to produce small quantities of secretion; colostrum. Although some women may produce as
much as 30ml per day in late pregnancy, the production of milk is held in abeyance until 30-40
hours following the birth, when placental hormones have fallen sufficiently to allow the high
levels of prolactin to initiate milk production. Continued production of prolactin is caused by
touch as the baby feeds at the breast, with concentrations highest during the night feeds.
Prolactin is involved in suppression of ovulation and some women may remain anovular until
lactation ceases. Prolactin seems to be more important to the initiation of lactation than to its
continuation. As lactation progresses, the prolactin response to suckling diminishes and milk
removal becomes the driving force behind milk production. This is known to be due to the
presence in secreted milk of a whey protein that is able to inhibit the synthesis of milk
constituents.

Milk is synthesized continuously into the alveolar lumen, where it is stored until milk removal
from the breast in initiated. Only when oxytocin is released and the myoepithelial cells contract,
is milk made available to the suckling baby. Milk release is underneuroendocrine control. Tactile
stimulation of the breast also stimulates oxytocin, causing contraction of the myoepithelial cells.
This process is known as let-down or milk-ejection reflex and makes the milk available to the
baby. This occurs in discrete pulses throughout the feed and may trigger bursts of active feeding.
In the early days of lactation, the reflex is unconditioned. Later, as it becomes a conditioned
reflex, the mother may find her breasts responding to the baby’s cry or other circumstances
associated with the baby or feeding.

2.2.3. Advantages of Breastfeeding to the Mother

Weight loss: while some women tend to gain weight during breastfeeding, others tend to lose
weight effortlessly lose weight. Although breastfeeding increases mothers’ demands by about
500 calories per day, the body’s hormonal balance is very different from normal. Because of
these hormonal changes, lactating mothers have an increased appetite and may be more prone to
storing fat for milk production. For the first three months after delivery, breastfeeding mothers
may lose less weight than women who do not breastfeed and they may gain weight. However
after three months of lactation, they will likely experience an increase in fat burning.

Contraction of the uterus: during pregnancy, the uterus grows immensely, expanding from the
size of a pear to filling almost the entire space of the abdomen. After delivery, the uterus goes
through a process called involution which helps to return it to its prepregnant size. Oxytocin
helps in this process and its secretion increases during breastfeeding. It also encourages uterine
contractions and reduces bleeding, helping the uterus return to its previous size.

Lower risk of depression: postpartum depression is a type of depression that can develop shortly
after childbirth affecting up to 15% of mothers. Breastfeeding causes hormonal changes that
encourage maternal care giving and bonding. Oxytocin production which increases during
breastfeeding is thought to have long-term anti-anxiety specific brain regions that promote
nurturing and relaxation. These effects may also partly explain why breastfeeding mothers have a
lower rate of maternal neglect, compared to those who do not breastfeed.

Reduced disease risk: according to Bjarnadottir, breastfeeding seems to provide the mother with
long-term protection against cancer and several diseases. The total time a woman spends
breastfeeding is linked with a reduced risk of breast and ovarian cancer. Women who breastfeed
for more than 12 months in their lifetime have a 28% lower risk for both breast and ovarian
cancer. Each year of breastfeeding is associated with a 4.3% decrease in breast cancer risk.
Women who breastfeed for 1-2 years over their lifetime have a 10-50% lower risk of high blood
pressure, arthritis, high blood fats, disease and type 2 diabetes.

Prevention of Menstruation: continued breastfeeding also pauses ovulation and menstruation.

The suspension of menstrual cycles may actually be nature’s way of ensuring there is some time
in between pregnancies. This is referred to as Lactational amenorrhoea.

Saves time and money: breastfeeding is completely free and requires very little effort. By
choosing breast feeding, there will not be a need to spend money on formula, spend time
cleaning and sterilizing bottles, mix and warm up bottles in the middle of the night or day, figure
out ways to warm up bottles while on the go.

2.2.4. Advantages of Breastfeeding to the Baby

Protection against illness: several studies have shown that stomach viruses, lower respiratory
problems, ear infections and meningitis are far less common in infants who are breastfed.

Protection against death: it is estimated that a breastfed child has a 20% less risk of dying
between the ages of 28 days and one year, compared with a non-breastfed baby. According to the
World Health Organization, if every child was breastfed within an hour of birth, given only
breast milk for their first six months of life, and continued breastfeeding to the age of two years,
an estimated 800,000 child lives could be saved every year.

Protection throughout childhood: protection against illness lasts way beyond the breastfeeding
stage and studies have shown that breastfeeding can reduce a child’s risk of developing certain
childhood cancers, high cholesterol, inflammatory bowel disease, high blood pressure, Crohn’s
disease, ulcerative colitis and type 1 and type 2 diabetes.
Protection against allergies: babies who are fed a formula based on cow’s milk or soy run a much
higher risk of suffering allergic reactions once food is introduced. Breast milk has the ability to
protect against disease and allergy due to a substance called Immunoglobulin A (igA). This
substance guards against the invasion of germs by forming a protective layer on the mucous
membranes in the baby’s intestines, nose and throat. When exposed to bacteria, the baby’s body
responds to the pathogen by creating secretory IgA that’s specific to the illness trying to break in

Boosts intelligence: there is a strong link between breastfeeding and cognitive development and
researchers have suggested that the longer the child is breastfed, the higher the IQ scores will be.

Helps control weight: studies have shown that a breastfed child is less likely to become obese as
a teen or adult. The reason for this may be that a breastfed child learns to eat only their hunger is
satisfied, setting a good eating pattern for later in life. Breast milk also contains less insulin
(which creates fat) and keeps weight down in the early stages of life [20].

Easy to digest: for most babies, breast milk is easier to digest than formula. Babies often need
time for their stomach to adjust to proteins found in cow’s milk and this can cause some
discomfort.

2.2.5. Concept of Exclusive Breastfeeding

Exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) is defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) as the
practice of feeding an infant only breast milk for the first six months of life, without the addition
of any other food or drink, including water, with the exception of medicines, oral rehydration
solutions, and vitamin or mineral supplements (WHO, 2003). This practice is recommended for
optimal growth, development, and health of infants, as breast milk contains all the nutrients
needed by an infant during the first months of life, and it provides immune protection against
infections. Exclusive breastfeeding also fosters a strong bond between mother and child,
contributing to the baby’s emotional and psychological development.

The importance of exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) is widely recognized in both low-income

and middle-income countries, where the practice has been shown to dramatically reduce infant
morbidity and mortality. In such regions, where access to clean water and sanitation is often
limited, exclusive breastfeeding provides essential protection against gastrointestinal infections
and other illnesses that can be life-threatening. According to Victora et al. (2016), infants who
are exclusively breastfed are less likely to suffer from diarrheal diseases, respiratory
infections, and other complications related to poor nutrition. The protective antibodies in breast
milk help strengthen the baby’s immune system, contributing to healthier outcomes. In low-
income and middle-income countries, however, data shows that only 37% of children under six
months are exclusively breastfed (UNICEF, 2020). This low rate can be attributed to several
factors, including cultural practices, insufficient maternal support, and limited access to
maternity leave or breastfeeding-friendly environments.

While the benefits of EBF are well recognized in low- and middle-income countries, the practice
in high-income countries, particularly in Organization for Economic Cooperation and
Development (OECD) countries, has been a subject of increasing interest and concern. Despite
widespread recommendations by health organizations like the WHO and the American Academy
of Pediatrics (AAP), exclusive breastfeeding rates remain relatively low in developed nations.
For instance, data indicates that only 39% of infants in OECD countries are exclusively breastfed
for the first four months of life, and just 23% for six months (McDonald et al., 2011). In the
United Kingdom, the rates of EBF are even lower, with only 12% of infants being exclusively
breastfed for four months and a mere 1% for six months (National Health Service [NHS], 2010).
These figures reveal a significant gap between the recommendations and the actual practice of
breastfeeding, raising concerns about the barriers mothers face in maintaining exclusive
breastfeeding.

Several factors contribute to the lower rates of exclusive breastfeeding in high-income countries.
One of the primary challenges is societal pressures and work-related constraints. In many
developed nations, mothers face considerable pressure to return to work shortly after childbirth,
making it difficult for them to exclusively breastfeed. Lack of maternity leave or limited
breastfeeding support in the workplace can discourage mothers from initiating or continuing
exclusive breastfeeding. In addition, the widespread availability and marketing of infant formula
present an alternative that many mothers find convenient, especially when they face challenges
such as inadequate breastfeeding education, insufficient lactation support, or the perception that
formula is equally nutritious as breast milk.
Cultural norms also play a role in shaping breastfeeding practices in high-income countries.
Despite the known benefits of breastfeeding, societal attitudes towards breastfeeding may
contribute to low rates of exclusive breastfeeding. In many developed nations, there may be a
social stigma associated with breastfeeding in public or the perception that breastfeeding is
inconvenient and outdated. This perception can discourage mothers from breastfeeding
exclusively and lead them to introduce formula feeding at an earlier stage.

Another critical factor influencing breastfeeding rates in developed countries is access to

breastfeeding support and education. Many mothers, especially those who are first-time
parents, may not have the knowledge or confidence to exclusively breastfeed. Hospitals and
healthcare providers may not offer sufficient support, and without proper education on
techniques such as positioning and latching, mothers may find breastfeeding difficult or painful,
which could lead them to abandon the practice early (Daly, 2017). Consequently, nurse-led
interventions and community-based breastfeeding support have been recognized as essential
to improving breastfeeding rates, but these services may be lacking in some developed countries.

Despite these challenges, the growing body of evidence continues to underscore the importance
of exclusive breastfeeding for infant health and development. Breast milk is considered the
optimal first food for infants because it provides all the nutrients needed for healthy growth and
development. Breast milk is particularly important for its immune-boosting properties, which
are critical during the first months of life, when the infant's immune system is still developing.
Studies have shown that exclusive breastfeeding significantly lowers the risk of infant
mortality, asthma, obesity, and Type 2 diabetes later in life (Victora et al., 2016).

Furthermore, exclusive breastfeeding has been associated with long-term health benefits for
mothers as well. Research suggests that breastfeeding reduces the risk of breast cancer and
ovarian cancer (Kramer & Kakuma, 2012). Additionally, breastfeeding promotes postpartum
recovery, helping the mother’s body return to its pre-pregnancy state and reducing the risk of
chronic conditions like obesity and cardiovascular disease.

Despite the barriers to exclusive breastfeeding in high-income countries, interventions that

support breastfeeding in the early stages of life, including lactation consultations, maternity
leave policies, and public health campaigns to normalize breastfeeding, are crucial for improving
breastfeeding rates and ensuring that more infants benefit from exclusive breastfeeding.
Governments, healthcare providers, and societies must work together to remove the barriers to
breastfeeding, support mothers in their breastfeeding journey, and educate families about the
significant long-term benefits of exclusive breastfeeding for both the mother and child.

In conclusion, while exclusive breastfeeding is widely accepted and practiced in low- and
middle-income countries, its prevalence remains lower than recommended in high-income
countries. This discrepancy highlights the need for better support systems, policies, and cultural
shifts to improve exclusive breastfeeding rates globally. As research continues to demonstrate
the profound health benefits for both mothers and infants, global efforts must focus on increasing
awareness, education, and support for breastfeeding practices across all countries, ensuring that
every mother and infant receives the benefits of exclusive breastfeeding.

2.2.6. Advantages of Exclusive Breastfeeding to the Mother

Exclusive breastfeeding offers several significant benefits to the mother, particularly in terms of
health and recovery postpartum. One of the primary advantages is the delay in the return of
menstrual cycles. This delay, also referred to as lactational amenorrhea, is a natural
contraceptive effect of breastfeeding. When a mother exclusively breastfeeds, the body produces
higher levels of the hormone prolactin, which inhibits ovulation. This delay in the return of
menstrual cycles can help space pregnancies, which is especially beneficial for maternal health
by allowing the body time to recover before another pregnancy (WHO, 2003).

Additionally, exclusive breastfeeding provides natural protection against pregnancy. It acts as a

temporary, reversible method of contraception known as the Lactational Amenorrhea Method
(LAM). As long as the mother is breastfeeding exclusively (without supplementing with formula
or other foods), and the baby is under six months of age, the likelihood of conception is
significantly reduced. However, the effectiveness of LAM is contingent upon specific conditions,
including the frequency and intensity of breastfeeding (Dickson et al., 2011).
Beyond reproductive benefits, exclusive breastfeeding also significantly reduces the risk of
breast and ovarian cancer in mothers. A study conducted by Kramer & Kakuma (2012)
demonstrated that mothers who breastfeed have a lower incidence of both breast cancer and
ovarian cancer compared to those who do not breastfeed. This is attributed to hormonal changes
that occur during breastfeeding, which may reduce exposure to estrogen, a hormone linked to the
development of these cancers. Additionally, breastfeeding contributes to the reduction of
postpartum bleeding and accelerates the return to pre-pregnancy weight, as the body expends
energy in milk production, helping to burn excess calories (Godfrey & Lawrence, 2010).

2.2.7. Advantages of Exclusive Breastfeeding to the Baby

For infants, exclusive breastfeeding offers a range of critical health advantages that contribute
to their overall growth, development, and well-being. One of the most significant benefits is the
lower risk of gastrointestinal infections. Breast milk contains immunoglobulins and other
bioactive compounds that help protect the baby from pathogens, particularly in the early stages
of life. According to Kramer and Kakuma (2012), exclusively breastfed infants are less likely
to suffer from gastrointestinal diseases, such as diarrhea, which is one of the leading causes of
infant mortality worldwide.

Breastfeeding also aids in regaining the weight lost after birth. All babies lose some weight in
the first few days of life, but exclusively breastfed infants generally regain this weight faster
than those who are formula-fed. This rapid weight recovery is primarily due to the high
nutritional content of breast milk, which is easily digestible and tailored to meet the baby’s needs
for growth (WHO, 2003).

Furthermore, exclusively breastfed babies experience quicker recovery from illnesses, such as
infections and colds. This is because breast milk contains a variety of immune factors, including
antibodies, that help babies fight off infections. According to Rempel & Moore (2012),
breastfed babies have a strengthened immune system, which enhances their ability to recover
from illness more rapidly compared to formula-fed infants.

Finally, exclusive breastfeeding protects the baby from a wide range of illnesses. This
includes not only gastrointestinal and respiratory infections but also chronic conditions such as
asthma, obesity, and type 2 diabetes. Studies have shown that breastfed infants are at a
significantly lower risk for these conditions later in life (Godfrey & Lawrence, 2010). Breast
milk also contains essential fatty acids, which are crucial for brain development, and it supports
cognitive functions, giving breastfed infants a developmental advantage (Kramer & Kakuma,
2012).

In summary, exclusive breastfeeding offers both immediate and long-term health benefits for
both mother and baby. For the mother, it provides natural contraception, aids in recovery
postpartum, and reduces the risk of certain cancers. For the baby, it strengthens the immune
system, promotes healthy growth, and reduces the risk of infections and chronic diseases. These
benefits underscore the importance of encouraging and supporting exclusive breastfeeding
practices globally.

2.2.8. Disadvantages of Exclusive Breastfeeding

For the Mother

The mother of the newborn baby may find it discomforting to breastfeed regularly. At the initial
days of exclusive breastfeeding, the nursing mother may have sore nipples. In fact, the
breastfeeding mother may find her breasts to be engorged or swollen throughout the
breastfeeding period. Since exclusive breastfeeding requires the mother to feed 8-12 times in a
day, it may be difficult for her to look after other household or work related chores. Considering
that the only source of nutrition for the baby is the mother’s milk, the latter has to compromise
on her own diet. Nursing mother must be careful about her own diet and continue to avoid or
limit the consumption of certain foods. Breastfeeding mothers have low libido which pushes
them to compromise their sex life

For the Baby

Breastfeeding is seen to be disadvantageous for the newborn baby when there is an inadequate
supply of breast milk or insufficient suck reflex in the baby. If the mother does not breastfeed the
baby well, the baby may experience dehydration, which can pave way for other problems.
Improper breastfeeding also invites health problems such as weight loss in the baby, slow growth
and development, difficulty in weaning etc. Since the nursing mother does not know how much
of milk her baby needs, there is a chance the baby develops health problems due to insufficient
supply of breast milk. Common signs of problems in an exclusively breastfed newborn baby
includes: irritability, vomiting, crying after feeding, skin rash, diarrhea.

2.2.9. Impact of Breastfeeding

A study carried out by Mbwana on exclusive breastfeeding showed that more than half of
pregnant women (57.5%) knew that a baby should be breastfed on demand, only 28.8% were
aware that breast milk alone is sufficient for the baby for six months while 41.3% though 4-5
months is the appropriate age to start solid foods. About 93.8% of the women were aware that
breastfeeding should continue for up two years. More than half of women (52.5%) believed that
it is right to give water to the baby after every breastfeed. Another study carried out on the
knowledge, attitude and practice of exclusive breastfeeding among mothers showed that only
about one third of mothers interviewed (34.7%) mentioned up to six months for the duration of
EBF. One quarter of mothers knew that EBF for six months protects the child from diarrhea
(27.3%), 32% of mothers responded that EBF could be used as contraceptive while 16.7% did
not think it could be used as contraceptive .

Another study carried out in Tatars village, Nasarawa state on the impact of exclusive
breastfeeding showed that sixty percent of the mothers were aware of EBF but only 30% of them
had the adequate impact of EBF having scored more than 50% or more in the assessment of
knowledge of EBF. Another study carried out by Mulugeta, Netsanet, Nigusie and Selam showed
that 69.8% of the respondents were grouped as having good knowledge and 30.2% were
categorized as having poor knowledge. 82% knew about EBF and 18% did not know about EBF.
Their major source of information was health institutions (66.4%). 70% had good knowledge
about the time to give breast milk to a child after birth.

2.2.10 Practice of Breastfeeding

The practice of breastfeeding, particularly exclusive breastfeeding (EBF), remains a crucial

public health concern due to its role in reducing infant morbidity and mortality. Despite the
extensive advocacy efforts by global health agencies such as WHO and UNICEF, the actual
practice of EBF is far from optimal in many developing countries, including Nigeria. Various
studies across different regions have revealed that while awareness about breastfeeding benefits
is widespread, this knowledge does not always translate into practice.

A study carried out in Tatara village provides insight into the breastfeeding practices among
mothers in that community. The findings indicated that a majority of the mothers (59.9%)
initiated breastfeeding soon after delivery, though 4.5% delayed initiation until after one day.
Encouragingly, 66.6% of the respondents reported breastfeeding on demand, which is consistent
with WHO recommendations. However, when it came to the use of prelacteal feeds, 77.4%
claimed not to have given any to their newborns, but nearly half (47.8%) still administered plain
water, which contradicts the principle of EBF. Furthermore, only 26.4% of the mothers reported
practicing exclusive breastfeeding for the recommended six months, while 50.2% introduced
additional feeds such as cow milk before their infants were six months old. These statistics
reflect a significant gap between knowledge and proper breastfeeding practice (Tatara Village
Survey, 2022).

Another study conducted in the same village revealed similar trends. Although more than half
(53%) of mothers initiated breastfeeding immediately after delivery, 47% delayed the process for
more than 30 minutes. Among the 179 mothers surveyed, only 31% practiced EBF, highlighting
a clear need for intensified breastfeeding education and support. The reasons for the low rates of
EBF could be multifactorial—ranging from cultural beliefs, family influence, misinformation,
and lack of support from healthcare providers. Early initiation and sustained EBF remain key
indicators of optimal breastfeeding practices and are essential for neonatal health and survival.

In another study by Agbo et al. (2020), the focus shifted to healthcare professionals, specifically
female doctors in Nigeria. Surprisingly, while all respondents demonstrated awareness of the
EBF recommendation for the first six months of life, only 60% knew that breastfeeding should
ideally continue until the child is two years old. This finding underscores that even among well-
educated and medically trained individuals, knowledge gaps persist, particularly concerning
extended breastfeeding. This may influence the advice they give to mothers and patients,
ultimately affecting community breastfeeding trends.
A third study carried out in Tatara village further emphasized the disparities in breastfeeding
practices. Among 254 women, 76.4% initiated breastfeeding immediately after delivery, and
63% reported practicing EBF at birth. However, EBF rates significantly declined as the infants
aged, dropping to only 30.5% by the time the babies were four to six months old. This sharp
decrease demonstrates the challenge of sustaining EBF over time, which may result from a lack
of postpartum follow-up, maternal employment, societal pressure, or perceived milk
insufficiency.

Verma and Dixit (2019) conducted a related study in rural Uttar Pradesh, India, revealing
similarly poor breastfeeding practices. Of the 256 mothers surveyed, 70.8% failed to initiate
breastfeeding within one hour of delivery—a critical period for neonatal bonding and colostrum
intake—while only 29.2% achieved timely initiation. Moreover, 67.2% of the mothers gave
prelacteal feeds, despite global guidelines strongly advising against this. Alarmingly, just 24.8%
of the mothers practiced EBF for six months. This study underscores the role of persistent
cultural practices and inadequate breastfeeding counseling in perpetuating harmful feeding
behaviors.

Collectively, these studies reveal a pattern of early initiation among some mothers but a low
overall rate of sustained exclusive breastfeeding. Key barriers to EBF include the administration
of prelacteal feeds, early introduction of cow milk or water, misinterpretation of infant hunger
cues, and the misconception that breast milk alone is insufficient for the growing infant. These
findings highlight the urgent need for enhanced community-based education programs, stronger
antenatal and postnatal counseling, and continuous support from healthcare professionals to
promote sustained EBF practices.

In conclusion, the practice of breastfeeding, particularly exclusive breastfeeding, is yet to reach

desirable levels despite high awareness. The identified gaps between knowledge and practice call
for more targeted interventions at both community and healthcare system levels. Health workers,
including nurses and midwives, must be trained to offer consistent and culturally sensitive
guidance to mothers, thereby improving breastfeeding outcomes and promoting long-term child
health and development.
2.2.11. Challenges of Breastfeeding

Mothers do not initiate breastfeeding or discontinue breastfeeding early for a variety of reasons.
Some mothers stopped breastfeeding in the first month postpartum because of sore nipples,
infant difficulty to latch and perceptions that they were not producing enough milk to satisfy
their infants. Societal barriers to breastfeeding, such as working outside the home, length of
maternity of maternity

leave and embarrassment of breastfeeding in public, have been identified as factors affecting
breastfeeding initiation and duration .Across many rural communities in Africa where
breastfeeding appears to be the norm, the question of whether to breastfeed or not, seldom arises
since women are expected or required by the cultural practices of those societies to do so.
Indeed, in both developed and the developing worlds, studies have showed the existence of
several influences on EBF. In the developed world, women’s breastfeeding decisions have been
shown to be influenced by their perception of partner’s attitudes and paternal involvement in
breastfeeding promotion programs.

A study of the societal influences on infant feeding among South African mothers shows the
fundamental role of social stigma, economic circumstance, maternal age, and family influences.

According to a study carried out by Thurman and Allen, lack of timely routine follow-up care
and postpartum home health visits, lack of family and broad societal support, media portrayal of
bottle as normative, misinformation and lack of guidance and encouragement from healthcare
professionals as some of the many obstacles mothers face when attempting to initiate and
continue breastfeeding. The lack of familial support, as well as lack of opportunity to observe
breastfeeding in societies can make it difficult for new mothers to attempt to breastfeed.
Moreover, misinformation form healthcare providers and minimal discussion about the process
and benefits of breastfeeding compared with formula feeding contribute to low breastfeeding
rates and increase maternal frustration and confusion regarding breastfeeding.

A study carried out on the barriers to exclusive breastfeeding among mothers in the first four
weeks postpartum shows that approximately half of the women (44%) cited inadequate milk
supply and sore or painful nipples (42.7%) as barriers to continue EBF. Slightly more than one-
third of the sample (34.7%) indicated that breastfeeding was very stressful and time-consuming.
The majority of women (78.7%) noted embarrassment was not a barrier to continue EBF. In
addition, 66.7% stated that return to work and return to school (73.3%) were not barriers to
continue EBF.

2.2.12 Role of the Midwife during Breastfeeding

The role of the midwife during breastfeeding is critical in ensuring that both the mother and baby
experience a successful and positive breastfeeding journey. The early postpartum period is a
crucial time when the foundation of breastfeeding is established, and the presence of a
knowledgeable and supportive midwife can significantly influence the outcome. The midwife’s
responsibilities are primarily twofold: firstly, to ensure that the infant is adequately nourished
through effective breastfeeding, and secondly, to empower the mother by equipping her with
practical skills in positioning and attachment to promote independent feeding (Blyth et al., 2002).

While babies are born with natural reflexes that facilitate breastfeeding, such as rooting and
sucking, mothers are not innately equipped with the knowledge and skill to breastfeed
successfully. As a result, it becomes essential that mothers—particularly first-time mothers—
receive structured guidance, emotional reassurance, and accurate information about the
breastfeeding process. The midwife serves as a central figure in offering these three types of
support: emotional support, practical support, and informational support (Renfrew et al.,
2012).

Emotional support involves offering encouragement, building the mother’s confidence, and
addressing anxiety or fear related to breastfeeding. Breastfeeding can be an emotionally charged
experience, especially when it is associated with pain, exhaustion, or feelings of inadequacy. A
midwife's calm demeanor and empathetic listening help mothers feel understood and reassured,
which in turn enhances their motivation to persist through challenges.

Practical support is perhaps the most visible role of the midwife in the initial weeks
postpartum. This includes teaching mothers about proper breastfeeding positions—such as cradle
hold, cross-cradle, and football hold—and how to recognize effective latching. Poor attachment
can result in sore nipples, breast engorgement, or ineffective feeding, all of which may lead
mothers to discontinue breastfeeding prematurely (WHO, 2003). The midwife helps in
troubleshooting common problems, such as engorgement or nipple confusion, and demonstrates
techniques for hand expression and breast massage if necessary.

Informational support includes providing small, digestible pieces of evidence-based knowledge

about the benefits of breastfeeding, feeding cues, the expected frequency and duration of feeds,
and signs of sufficient milk intake in infants. Mothers often feel overwhelmed by conflicting
advice from family, friends, or social media. Hence, midwives are expected to provide current,
research-backed, and unbiased information in a manner that is easy for mothers to understand
and apply (UNICEF, 2015).

It is important to recognize that not only first-time mothers need breastfeeding support. Mothers
who have previously breastfed may also require assistance for a variety of reasons. For instance,
some may have had unsuccessful breastfeeding experiences in the past and are now trying to
overcome psychological or physical challenges related to those failures. Others may have had a
smooth breastfeeding experience earlier, but without fully understanding why it went well—it
might have been due to chance or a particularly easy-going baby. In such cases, a new baby who
behaves differently or has unique needs may create an unexpected challenge (Hoddinott, Tappin,
& Wright, 2008).

Furthermore, mothers who recently weaned a toddler may find themselves surprised at the
intensity and frequency of feeding required by a newborn. They may also have forgotten the
need for initial support, particularly in the first few days when milk supply is being established.
In other cases, mothers may have previously followed breastfeeding advice that is now
considered outdated or unsupported by current guidelines—such as strict feeding schedules or
early supplementation—which could undermine their confidence or contradict updated
recommendations given by healthcare providers today.

Therefore, the midwife must be adaptable, understanding that each mother-baby dyad is
unique and may require individualized care and attention. Midwives must stay informed through
continuous professional development and maintain sensitivity to cultural, emotional, and social
contexts that shape breastfeeding practices. By doing so, they ensure that mothers receive the
kind of support that aligns with both their physiological needs and personal circumstances
(Baby-Friendly Initiative, 2021).

In conclusion, the midwife plays a pivotal role not only in ensuring that babies are adequately
fed but also in equipping mothers with the skills, confidence, and knowledge required for a
successful breastfeeding experience. Through a combination of emotional, practical, and
informational support, midwives bridge the gap between intention and practice, helping to
improve breastfeeding initiation and duration rates—an essential public health priority globally
and locally.

2.3. Theoretical Framework: The Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB)

The Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB), developed by Icek Ajzen in 1985, is a widely
recognized psychological theory that seeks to explain the relationship between attitudes,
intentions, and behaviour. It has become an essential framework for understanding and
predicting health behaviours, including those related to breastfeeding. TPB posits that an
individual’s intention to engage in a behaviour is the primary predictor of whether or not they
will actually perform the behaviour. Furthermore, this intention is shaped by three core factors:
attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived behavioural control (PBC) (Ajzen, 1985).

Key Constructs of TPB

The Theory of Planned Behaviour is grounded in the assumption that human behaviour is
guided by reasoned actions, which are influenced by an individual’s attitudes, the social pressure
they perceive, and their perceived control over the behaviour.

1. Attitudes Toward the Behaviour

Attitudes refer to the individual’s positive or negative evaluations of performing a
behaviour. In the context of breastfeeding, a mother’s attitude toward breastfeeding
can significantly affect her intention to breastfeed. For example, if a mother believes that
breastfeeding is beneficial for her baby’s health and development, she is more likely to
have a positive attitude toward breastfeeding, which in turn will increase her intention to
engage in breastfeeding. This aspect is shaped by the individual’s behavioural beliefs,
 which are based on their understanding of the outcomes or attributes of the behaviour. If
a mother believes breastfeeding will provide nutritional benefits or strengthen her baby’s
immune system, she is more likely to view breastfeeding positively.
2. Subjective Norms
Subjective norms pertain to the social pressures or expectations that individuals feel
from others, such as family members, friends, or society at large. These pressures
influence an individual’s intention to perform a behaviour. For breastfeeding, subjective
norms might include the expectations of family members, healthcare providers, or
even cultural norms about infant feeding practices. For instance, if a woman’s family or
her community supports breastfeeding and views it as the appropriate way to nourish a
baby, she is more likely to intend to breastfeed. Conversely, if the community or
significant others place greater value on formula feeding, this could create pressure that
discourages breastfeeding.

The subjective norm is driven by normative beliefs, which reflect the perceived
expectations of others. These beliefs shape the degree to which an individual perceives
the support or disapproval of breastfeeding in their social environment.

3. Perceived Behavioural Control (PBC)

Perceived behavioural control refers to an individual’s perception of their ability to
perform a particular behaviour, and it is influenced by both internal and external factors.
In the context of breastfeeding, PBC involves a mother’s belief in her ability to
breastfeed successfully. For instance, if a mother feels that she has the time, resources,
and support to breastfeed, she will have a higher level of perceived behavioural control
and thus, a stronger intention to breastfeed. External factors such as access to lactation
support, availability of maternity leave, or availability of clean and comfortable
spaces for breastfeeding can play a crucial role in shaping PBC. Additionally, internal
factors such as the mother’s confidence in her lactation abilities, her physical health,
and her emotional readiness also influence perceived control.

The relationship between perceived behavioural control and actual behaviour is complex,
as individuals may face challenges, such as physical barriers (e.g., sore nipples,
 insufficient milk supply) or external barriers (e.g., lack of workplace support) that could
hinder their ability to breastfeed. The theory of planned behaviour emphasizes that PBC
can influence both intentions and actual behaviour, making it a central component of
the model.

Beliefs Underlying TPB

The TPB is influenced by three types of beliefs: behavioural beliefs, normative beliefs, and
control beliefs. These beliefs provide the foundation for the three main constructs of TPB.

1. Behavioural Beliefs: These are the beliefs an individual holds about the outcomes or
consequences of performing a behaviour. For example, a mother who believes that
breastfeeding will provide health benefits for her baby is more likely to have a positive
attitude toward breastfeeding. These beliefs are tied to the perceived advantages or
disadvantages of the behaviour.
2. Normative Beliefs: These refer to the beliefs about the expectations of others and the
social pressure to conform to these expectations. If a mother believes that her family and
community approve of breastfeeding, this social support will strengthen her intention to
breastfeed. Conversely, if there are strong cultural or social pressures to use formula,
these normative beliefs may discourage breastfeeding.
3. Control Beliefs: These are the beliefs that an individual holds about the presence of
factors that might either facilitate or hinder their ability to perform the behaviour. In the
case of breastfeeding, control beliefs might include the availability of support from
healthcare providers or the challenges of balancing work and breastfeeding. These beliefs
shape the perceived behavioural control, which in turn affects both the intention to
breastfeed and the actual breastfeeding behaviour.

Application of TPB to Breastfeeding

The Theory of Planned Behaviour is highly applicable in understanding why some mothers may
choose not to breastfeed or practice exclusive breastfeeding. By understanding the attitudes,
subjective norms, and perceived behavioural control associated with breastfeeding, public
health interventions can be tailored to promote exclusive breastfeeding practices effectively. For
instance:

 Attitude Modification: Interventions could focus on changing mothers’ attitudes by

educating them about the health benefits of breastfeeding for both mother and child.
Providing evidence-based information can help mothers develop positive beliefs about
the advantages of breastfeeding, such as the nutritional value and immune protection it
provides.
 Normative Influence: Public health campaigns could also aim to shift societal norms
around breastfeeding by encouraging family involvement and community support for
breastfeeding mothers. This would help create a supportive environment for
breastfeeding, reducing social stigma and making it easier for mothers to initiate and
sustain breastfeeding.
 Enhancing Perceived Behavioural Control: Interventions should also focus on
improving mothers' confidence and the availability of resources needed for successful
breastfeeding. Providing access to lactation consultants, breastfeeding-friendly
workplaces, and maternity leave policies can significantly enhance perceived control
and empower mothers to breastfeed.

The Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) offers a comprehensive framework for understanding
the various factors that influence breastfeeding behaviours. By examining the roles of attitudes,
subjective norms, and perceived behavioural control, TPB provides insight into why some
mothers may struggle to adopt exclusive breastfeeding practices. This theory not only helps
identify barriers to breastfeeding but also provides a foundation for developing targeted
interventions that can encourage and support breastfeeding mothers.

Understanding these key constructs and beliefs is crucial for developing effective breastfeeding
promotion strategies and supporting mothers in making informed decisions about infant
feeding. TPB thus plays a vital role in shaping health behaviour interventions, ultimately
improving maternal and child health outcomes globally.

2.3.1. Application of Theoretical Framework to Study

An infant’s feeding decisions are affected by a wide range of psychological, social, clinical,
cultural, and individual characteristics: factors such as age, ethnicity, educational status, and
personality variables .The intention of mothers to carry out exclusive breastfeeding affects the
mother’s behaviour. This intention is greatly influenced by the perceived outcomes of carrying
out EBF to both mother and child.

There are three determinants of intention:

Attitudes: the perceived outcome and attributes greatly affect the mother’s intention. She will
only carry out EBF if the benefits outweigh the risks. Previous experience can also affect the
practice of EBF.

Subjective norms: The support gotten from spouse, family and friends also encourage the
practice of EBF. If the mother is encouraged when she practices it and admonished when she
does not, it greatly affects the practice of EBF.

Perceived behavioral control: Women who have the perception that breastfeeding is difficult to
perform are less likely to breastfeed and may encourage the use of formula feeding among
postpartum women. Therefore it is only women who have positive attitudes towards EBF that
will be able to carry it out.

2.4 Empirical and Related Literature Review

Benefits of Exclusive Breastfeeding

Breastfeeding remains one of the most effective ways to ensure child health and survival.
According to the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP, 2005), exclusive breastfeeding (EBF)
for the first six months of life provides the ideal nutrition for infants and is a critical component
in reducing child morbidity and mortality globally. Similarly, Piñeiro-Albero et al. (2013) assert
that EBF contributes substantially to the psychological, social, and immunological development
of the infant while promoting better maternal health outcomes. Studies by the United States
Breastfeeding Committee (USBFC, 2014) underscore that breastfeeding supports optimal brain
development and fosters strong emotional bonding between mother and child.
WHO (2003) emphasizes that exclusive breastfeeding reduces the incidence of childhood
diseases such as diarrhea and pneumonia—the two leading causes of death in children under
five. According to Godfrey and Lawrence (2010), infants exclusively breastfed for six months or
longer are less likely to develop allergic diseases, obesity, type II diabetes, hypertension, and
high cholesterol later in life. Al Binali (2012) reinforces this claim, noting that EBF lowers the
risks of conditions such as otitis media, respiratory illnesses, sudden infant death syndrome
(SIDS), necrotizing enterocolitis, and gastroenteritis.

Research by Kramer and Kakuma (2012) provided additional insight into the protective benefits
of breastfeeding against long-term diseases. Their meta-analysis showed reduced incidences of
bacterial meningitis, urinary tract infections, lymphoma, leukemia, Hodgkin’s disease, and
asthma in breastfed children. Moreover, cognitive development is improved in exclusively
breastfed infants, alongside enhanced emotional bonding (Rempel & Moore, 2012).

Maternal Benefits

Breastfeeding is also beneficial to mothers. Stevens et al. (2008) state that exclusive
breastfeeding contributes to maternal health by lowering the risks of ovarian and breast cancer,
particularly with prolonged lactation. Furthermore, breastfeeding assists in the quicker return to
pre-pregnancy weight, reduces postpartum bleeding, and delays the return of ovulation, which
may help with child spacing (Godfrey & Lawrence, 2010).

Emotionally, breastfeeding mothers experience higher levels of oxytocin, a hormone associated

with reduced stress and enhanced maternal behavior. Research by Stuebe, Grewen, and Meltzer-
Brody (2013) shows that exclusive breastfeeding is linked with reduced risks of postpartum
depression, fostering emotional well-being among mothers.

Social and Economic Benefits

Exclusive breastfeeding not only benefits the mother and child but also extends advantages to
society. According to Ma, Brewer-Asling, and Magnus (2013), breastfeeding saves families and
healthcare systems millions in treatment costs for preventable diseases. Ku and Chow (2010)
observed that infants who were breastfed exclusively required fewer medical visits,
prescriptions, and hospital admissions.

Breastfeeding is also environmentally friendly. A study by Ball and Bennett (2001) noted that
exclusive breastfeeding significantly reduces the demand for formula, feeding bottles, and
artificial teats—thereby minimizing the production of plastic waste and conserving natural
resources. Breastfeeding, being a renewable resource, aligns with sustainable development goals
by contributing to environmental preservation.

Barriers to Exclusive Breastfeeding

Despite its many advantages, exclusive breastfeeding is often interrupted or avoided due to
numerous challenges. In a study conducted in the United States, Li et al. (2008) found that 54%
of mothers stopped exclusive breastfeeding within the first month due to issues with infant
latching and suckling. Other commonly cited reasons included sore or bleeding nipples (37%),
breast pain (29%), and engorgement (24%).

Socioeconomic and demographic factors also play a critical role in breastfeeding behavior.
Research by Rojjanasrirat and Sousa (2010) found that lower maternal age, low income, less
education, and being unmarried were associated with reduced rates of exclusive breastfeeding.
Similarly, Wiener and Wiener (2011) reported that cultural perceptions and lack of workplace
support contributed to shorter durations of breastfeeding.

The timing of prenatal care initiation is also significant. Tenfelde, Finnegan, and Hill (2011)
showed that women who began prenatal care during their first trimester were more likely to
breastfeed exclusively than those who started care later. Moreover, the mode of delivery affects
breastfeeding practices. Ahluwalia, Li, and Morrow (2012) observed that women who underwent
cesarean sections or induced labor were less likely to initiate and continue breastfeeding
compared to those who delivered vaginally.

Role of Support and Health Education

Support systems have a profound effect on breastfeeding initiation and continuity. Brand et al.
(2011), through a longitudinal study on postpartum depression and early breastfeeding cessation,
demonstrated that emotional and professional support significantly influences mothers’ decisions
to continue exclusive breastfeeding. Their findings suggest that mothers who had supportive
environments—whether through family, health practitioners, or peer counselors—were more
likely to overcome initial breastfeeding difficulties.

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS, 2011) emphasized in its Surgeon
General’s Call to Action that many mothers wish to breastfeed but face institutional and systemic
barriers within the healthcare and employment sectors, which lead to early cessation. Addressing
these barriers through policy reform, workplace accommodations, and public awareness is
essential to promote EBF.

Education is also a crucial factor in promoting breastfeeding. Mothers who receive prenatal and
postnatal breastfeeding education are more equipped to handle breastfeeding challenges and less
likely to abandon the practice (Li et al., 2008). Studies suggest that interventions aimed at
teaching mothers proper latching techniques, helping them recognize feeding cues, and
debunking myths about milk insufficiency significantly improve breastfeeding rates and
duration.

Empirical Evidence from Developing Contexts

While much of the existing research comes from Western countries, studies from developing
nations further substantiate the benefits and challenges of exclusive breastfeeding. For example,
in Nigeria, a study by Agunbiade and Ogunleye (2012) found that despite high awareness of the
benefits of EBF, actual practice was significantly lower due to cultural practices, work-related
constraints, and lack of family support. They emphasized the need for community-based
interventions and policy support to improve adherence.

Similarly, in Ghana, Aidam et al. (2005) observed that women who had access to skilled
healthcare providers and received counseling on EBF were more likely to initiate and maintain
the practice. The study called for integration of breastfeeding counseling into antenatal and
postnatal care services.
Gaps in the Literature Review

1. Lack of Localized/Nigerian Context-Specific Data

 Gap: While one or two Nigerian studies were referenced (e.g., Agunbiade & Ogunleye,
2012), most of the literature comes from the U.S., Europe, and a few African countries
like Ghana.
 What’s Missing: A deeper review of local studies or health surveys (e.g., NDHS reports,
NBS data) specific to your target community or region within Nigeria, especially rural vs.
urban breastfeeding practices.
 Opportunity: Your study can fill this by focusing specifically on the effects of
breastfeeding in your chosen Nigerian context.

2. Limited Discussion on Fathers' or Family Influence

 Gap: The review barely touches on the role of partners, family members, or cultural
gatekeepers in influencing breastfeeding decisions.
 What’s Missing: Research on how spousal support, grandmothers’ advice, or social
pressure affect breastfeeding adherence.
 Opportunity: Including this perspective can offer a more holistic view of determinants
of breastfeeding behavior.

3. Inadequate Focus on Institutional and Workplace Policies in Nigeria

 Gap: The literature mentions institutional barriers and workplace support but mainly
from U.S. sources.
 What’s Missing: An analysis of Nigeria’s maternity leave policies, breastfeeding spaces
at workplaces, and enforcement of baby-friendly initiatives in hospitals.
 Opportunity: You can investigate how national or local policies impact breastfeeding
practices in your area.

4. Little Discussion of Breastfeeding Myths and Cultural Beliefs

  Gap: Cultural misconceptions that discourage exclusive breastfeeding (e.g., beliefs that
breast milk is insufficient, or early introduction of water is necessary) are not explored in
detail.
 What’s Missing: Context-specific beliefs and traditions that may interfere with optimal
breastfeeding.
 Opportunity: This cultural insight can enrich your work and suggest locally tailored
interventions.

5. Lack of Longitudinal or Follow-up Study Evidence

 Gap: Most studies cited are cross-sectional or observational.

 What’s Missing: Long-term studies showing effects of breastfeeding beyond infancy
(e.g., school performance, chronic illness in adulthood).
 Opportunity: If your methodology allows, you could track post-breastfeeding outcomes
(or at least discuss the need for such data).

6. Not Enough Exploration of Mental Health and Breastfeeding in the Nigerian Context

 Gap: While maternal depression is touched upon, it’s based mostly on Western research.
 What’s Missing: Information on postpartum depression and mental health impacts of
breastfeeding (or not breastfeeding) among Nigerian women.
 Opportunity: Even if not your study’s focus, mentioning this can highlight an area for
future research.

7. Insufficient Analysis of Healthcare Workers’ Knowledge and Attitudes

 Gap: The role of nurses, midwives, and traditional birth attendants in influencing
breastfeeding is not explored.
 What’s Missing: Studies showing the effect of health worker advice and consistency of
breastfeeding messaging during antenatal/postnatal care.
 Opportunity: You can assess this in your fieldwork or recommend it for future research.
 CHAPTER THREE

METHODOLOGY

3.1 Introduction

This chapter presents the methodology employed in carrying out the research on the Effects of
Breastfeeding to Mother and Child. It outlines the detailed plan that guided the data collection
and analysis procedures. Specifically, it covers the research design, population of the study,
sampling technique and sample size, reliability and validity of the research instrument, data
collection procedure, and the methods used for analyzing the data collected. The methodological
approach was carefully structured to ensure the reliability, objectivity, and validity of the
findings.

3.2 Research Design

The research design used in this study was a descriptive survey design. This design was chosen
because it enables the researcher to gather data from a specific population at a given point in
time to describe and analyze patterns, behaviors, and relationships. A self-structured
questionnaire was used as the primary data collection instrument. The design allowed the
researcher to explore both the descriptive and analytical aspects of the effects of breastfeeding,
particularly in relation to the demographic characteristics and perceptions of breastfeeding
mothers. The design was suitable for assessing both qualitative and quantitative data and was
instrumental in evaluating the various impacts of breastfeeding on mothers and their children in
Tatara village.

3.3 Population of the Study

The population of the study consisted of all breastfeeding mothers residing in Tatara Village,
Karu Local Government Area of Nasarawa State. This target group was selected because they
possess firsthand experience of breastfeeding and could provide relevant and practical insights
into its effects on both themselves and their children. According to local health center records
and community health data, the estimated number of breastfeeding mothers in Tatara Village at
the time of the study was approximately 150. The population was deemed adequate to provide
comprehensive data for the research.

3.4 Sample Size and Sampling Technique

To ensure a non-biased representation of the target population, the researcher employed the
simple random sampling technique. This method allowed every breastfeeding mother in Tatara
Village an equal opportunity to be selected for participation in the study. The random sampling
approach helped eliminate selection bias and increased the generalizability of the study findings.

From the population of approximately 150 breastfeeding mothers, a sample size of 20

respondents was selected. The sample size was determined based on the scope of the study, time
constraints, and resource availability. Though small, the sample was sufficient for an exploratory
study of this nature and provided valuable data for preliminary analysis.

3.5 Reliability and Validity of Instruments

To ensure that the research instrument measured what it was intended to measure, the reliability
and validity of the self-structured questionnaire were thoroughly tested.

Reliability

The reliability of the instrument was determined using the Test-Retest Method. The same
questionnaire was administered twice to a group of 20 breastfeeding mothers in Tatara Village
within a 2-day interval. The responses from the two rounds were analyzed for consistency. The
results indicated a high correlation coefficient of 0.9, which shows that the questionnaire was
highly reliable and capable of producing consistent results over time.

Validity

Face validity and content validity were applied to ensure that the instrument was valid. Experts
in public health and educational research reviewed the questionnaire to confirm that it covered
all aspects relevant to the study’s objectives. Their feedback was used to refine and restructure
some of the questions to enhance clarity and relevance. The validation process confirmed that the
questions were appropriate for measuring the perceived and observed effects of breastfeeding on
both mother and child.

3.6 Data Collection Procedure

The data collection process was systematic and ethically conducted. A self-structured
questionnaire was used to gather data from the selected respondents. The questionnaire was
developed based on the research objectives and questions.

The researcher visited each of the selected mothers in their homes or at the local health facility.
For those who could read and write, the questionnaire was handed to them to complete
independently. For respondents who were not literate, the researcher read the questions aloud
and recorded their responses accordingly. This approach ensured that all selected participants
were included, regardless of their educational level.

Participation was voluntary, and informed consent was obtained from each respondent before
administering the questionnaire. Confidentiality and anonymity of the participants were also
assured throughout the research process.

3.7 Methods of Data Analysis

The data collected from the questionnaire as response from the respondents was analyzed using
both the descriptive and inferential statistical methods. The descriptive statistical method was
used where frequency distribution and percentage was used to summarize the demographic
characteristics of the respondents. A four point liker scale was used for the data analysis and the
mean and standard deviation was calculated for the analysis of data related to the research
objectives and questions.

The data collected from the questionnaires were analyzed using both descriptive and inferential
statistical methods.

 Descriptive statistics such as frequency distribution and percentages were used to

summarize demographic data and responses related to breastfeeding practices.
 A four-point Likert scale (Strongly Agree, Agree, Disagree, and Strongly Disagree) was
employed to analyze respondents’ attitudes and perceptions toward breastfeeding.
 The mean and standard deviation were computed to interpret responses to the research
questions and objectives, helping to identify patterns and draw conclusions about the
effects of breastfeeding.
 Charts and tables were used where necessary to present the analyzed data in a visual
format for easier interpretation.
 CHAPTER FOUR

DATA PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION OF FINDINGS

4.1 Introduction

This chapter presents the analysis of the data collected through questionnaires administered to
mothers in Tatara Village. The data are presented using frequency tables, percentages, and
interpretations to understand the effects of breastfeeding on both mothers and children. The
analysis focuses on demographic information, breastfeeding practices, knowledge of exclusive
breastfeeding, and its perceived impacts.

4.2 Demographic Characteristics of Respondents

Table 4.1: Age Distribution of Respondents

Age Range (Years) Frequency Percentage (%)

18 – 25 25 25
26 – 30 35 35
31 – 35 20 20
36 and above 20 20
Total 100 100

Interpretation: The highest percentage (35%) of mothers surveyed were between 26–30 years,
indicating the most active reproductive and breastfeeding age.
Table 4.2: Educational Qualification of Respondents

Educational Level Frequency Percentage (%)

No Formal Education 18 18

Primary 32 32

Secondary 28 28

Tertiary 22 22

Total 100 100

Interpretation: A significant proportion of mothers (32%) had only primary education, which
could influence their access to health information, including breastfeeding practices.
Table 4.3: Marital Status of Respondents

Marital Status Frequency Percentage (%)

Single 10 10

Married 85 85

Divorced 5 5

Total 100 100

Interpretation: The majority (85%) of the respondents were married, suggesting a relatively
stable environment for child-rearing.

4.3 Breastfeeding Practices

Table 4.4: Initiation of Breastfeeding

Time of Initiation Frequency Percentage (%)

Immediately after birth 53 53%

Within 30 minutes 17 17%
After 1 hour 19 19%
After 1 day 11 11%
Total 100 100%

Interpretation: A little over half (53%) of the mothers initiated breastfeeding immediately after
birth, indicating compliance with WHO recommendations.
Table 4.5: Duration of Exclusive Breastfeeding
Duration Frequency Percentage %

Less than 3 months 30 30%

3 to 5 months 37 37%

6 months 33 33%

Total 100 100

Interpretation: Only 33% of the mothers practiced exclusive breastfeeding for the
recommended 6 months.

4.4 Perceived Effects of Breastfeeding on the Child

Table 4.6: Child Health Benefits Observed

Frequency
Health Benefits Percentage (%)

Improved immunity 40 40%

Fewer hospital visits 30 30

Better growth 20 20%

No observed difference 10 10%

Total 100 100%

Interpretation: 40% of the mothers observed improved immunity in their children, confirming
the protective health effects of breastfeeding.
4.5 Perceived Effects of Breastfeeding on the Mother

Table 4.7: Maternal Health Benefits

Benefits to Mother Frequency Percentage (%)

Weight loss after childbirth 35 35%

Bonding with child 30 30%

Delayed return of 25 25%

menstruation

No effect 10 10%

Total 100 100%

Interpretation: A significant number of mothers (35%) reported postnatal weight loss due to
breastfeeding, while 30% highlighted emotional bonding as a key benefit.

4.6 Discussion of Findings

The findings of this study corroborate prior research on the effectiveness and benefits of
breastfeeding for both mother and child. The initiation rate of breastfeeding was moderate, with
over 50% initiating immediately after birth, which aligns with WHO recommendations.
However, exclusive breastfeeding for the full six months was lower than ideal (33%), consistent
with similar rural studies (Verma & Dixit, 2018).

Additionally, many mothers acknowledged improved immunity and reduced illness in breastfed
children, as seen in studies by Kramer & Kakuma (2012). Maternal benefits such as postpartum
weight loss and emotional bonding were also commonly reported, supporting the findings of
Stuebe et al. (2013).
Despite high awareness levels, challenges such as traditional beliefs, lack of knowledge, and
early supplementation still limit exclusive breastfeeding practice. This calls for continued
midwife support, community-based education, and culturally appropriate interventions.
 CHAPTER FIVE

SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION

5.1 Introduction

This chapter presents the summary, conclusion, and recommendations based on the findings of
the study titled "Effects of Breastfeeding to Mother and Child." The aim of this study was to
investigate the health, psychological, and social impacts of breastfeeding on both mothers and
their children. This chapter outlines the major findings, draws logical conclusions from the data
analyzed in the previous chapters, and offers practical recommendations to improve
breastfeeding practices. It also suggests areas for future research and includes a list of references
and an appendix.

5.2 Summary

The study investigated the effects of breastfeeding on mothers and their children, with a focus on
health benefits, psychosocial implications, and the barriers that hinder optimal breastfeeding
practices. The research adopted a descriptive survey design and utilized a structured
questionnaire to collect data from nursing mothers in selected healthcare facilities.

Findings revealed that breastfeeding significantly contributes to the health and well-being of both
mother and child. For infants, it provides complete nutrition, enhances immunity, reduces the
risk of infections and chronic diseases, and supports proper growth and development. For
mothers, breastfeeding aids in postpartum recovery, reduces the risk of certain cancers (such as
breast and ovarian cancer), and fosters emotional bonding with the child.

The study also found that knowledge and awareness of breastfeeding benefits were relatively
high among participants. However, actual practice, especially exclusive breastfeeding for the
recommended first six months, was limited due to various factors such as maternal employment,
inadequate family support, cultural misconceptions, and lack of conducive workplace policies.
5.3 Conclusion

Based on the findings, the following conclusions were drawn:

1. Breastfeeding has significant positive health impacts on infants, including enhanced

immunity, reduced infant mortality, and proper physical and cognitive development.
2. Breastfeeding offers measurable health benefits to mothers, such as reduced
postpartum bleeding, quicker uterine involution, and decreased risk of breast and ovarian
cancers.
3. Despite high awareness levels, exclusive breastfeeding rates remain low, primarily
due to societal, cultural, and economic barriers.
4. Support systems for breastfeeding mothers are inadequate, particularly in
workplaces, which discourages continued breastfeeding once maternity leave ends.
5. There is a gap between knowledge and practice, indicating the need for more targeted
breastfeeding education and support programs.

5.4 Recommendations

In light of the study findings, the following recommendations are made:

i. Strengthen breastfeeding education programs at both community and healthcare

levels to address myths and improve understanding of exclusive breastfeeding benefits.
ii. Promote workplace breastfeeding policies, including longer paid maternity leave,
breastfeeding breaks, and provision of lactation rooms, to support working mothers.
iii. Encourage community and family support systems for nursing mothers through
awareness campaigns led by healthcare providers and traditional leaders.
iv. Enhance training for healthcare workers to enable them to offer consistent
breastfeeding counseling and support during antenatal and postnatal visits.
v. Implement stronger national policies aligned with WHO recommendations that
promote and protect breastfeeding, including restrictions on formula marketing.
vi. Future research should explore the long-term psychological and developmental
outcomes of breastfeeding beyond infancy and assess the role of male partners in
supporting breastfeeding mothers.
 REFERENCES

Daly, S. (2017). Support for breastfeeding mothers. Breastfeeding Review, 25(1), 5-12.

Kramer, M. S., & Kakuma, R. (2012). The optimal duration of exclusive breastfeeding.
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 8(3), 112-123.

McDonald, S. W., et al. (2011). Breastfeeding practices in OECD countries. Journal of

Pediatrics, 158(6), 870-875.

National Health Service (NHS). (2010). Infant feeding and breastfeeding. NHS Choices.
Retrieved from [Link]

UNICEF. (2020). The State of the World's Children 2020. UNICEF.

Victora, C. G., et al. (2016). Breastfeeding in the 21st century: Epidemiology, mechanisms,
and lifelong effect. The Lancet, 387(10017), 475-490.

World Health Organization (WHO). (2003). Global Strategy for Infant and Young Child
Feeding. WHO.

Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhl & J.
Beckmann (Eds.), Action Control: From Cognition to Behavior (pp. 11-39).
Springer-Verlag.

Mula, L., & Watson, L. (2020). Influencing breastfeeding practices: The role of health
education in changing attitudes and behavior. International Journal of Health
Education, 47(2), 140-150.
Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey (NDHS, 2018). National Population Commission
(NPC) and ICF International. Abuja, Nigeria.

Ogbo, F. A., Eastwood, J., Page, A., Arora, A., McKenzie, A., & Jalaludin, B. (2017).
Prevalence and determinants of cessation of exclusive breastfeeding in the early
postnatal period in Sydney, Australia. International Breastfeeding Journal, 12(1),
16.

Victora, C. G., Bahl, R., Barros, A. J., França, G. V., Horton, S., Krasevec, J., ... & Rollins, N.
C. (2016). Breastfeeding in the 21st century: epidemiology, mechanisms, and
lifelong effect. The Lancet, 387(10017), 475–490.

World Health Organization. (2020). Infant and young child feeding. Retrieved from
[Link]

Agbo, H. A., Okonkwo, C. A., & Udo, I. (2020). Impact of breastfeeding practices among
female doctors in Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Medicine, 29(3), 233-239.

Tatara Village Survey. (2022). Maternal breastfeeding practices in Northern Nigeria: A

community-based study.

Verma, S., & Dixit, R. (2019). Exclusive breastfeeding practices among women in rural Uttar
Pradesh. Indian Journal of Community Health, 31(1), 34-39.

World Health Organization (WHO). (2003). Global Strategy for Infant and Young Child
Feeding. Geneva: WHO.

Baby-Friendly Initiative. (2021). Standards for maternity care. UNICEF UK.

Blyth, R., Creedy, D. K., Dennis, C. L., Moyle, W., Pratt, J., & De Vries, S. M. (2002).
Effect of maternal confidence on breastfeeding duration: An application of
breastfeeding self‐efficacy theory. Birth, 29(4), 278–284.
Hoddinott, P., Tappin, D., & Wright, C. (2008). Breast feeding. BMJ, 336(7649), 881–887.

Renfrew, M. J., McCormick, F. M., Wade, A., Quinn, B., & Dowswell, T. (2012). Support
for healthy breastfeeding mothers with healthy term babies. Cochrane Database of
Systematic Reviews, (5).

UNICEF. (2015). Breastfeeding and the Baby-Friendly Initiative. Retrieved from

[Link]

World Health Organization (WHO). (2003). Global strategy for infant and young child
feeding.

AAP. (2005). Breastfeeding and the use of human milk. Pediatrics, 115(2), 496–506.

Agunbiade, O. M., & Ogunleye, O. V. (2012). Constraints to exclusive breastfeeding practice

among breastfeeding mothers in Southwest Nigeria: Implications for scaling up.
International Breastfeeding Journal, 7(1), 5.

Ahluwalia, I. B., Li, R., & Morrow, B. (2012). Breastfeeding practices: Does method of
delivery matter? Pediatrics, 129(4), e921-e927.

Aidam, B. A., Pérez-Escamilla, R., Lartey, A., & Aidam, J. (2005). Factors associated with
exclusive breastfeeding in Accra, Ghana. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition,
59(6), 789–796.

Al Binali, A. M. (2012). Breastfeeding knowledge, attitude, and practice among mothers in

Saudi Arabia. Saudi Medical Journal, 33(4), 450–455.

Ball, T. M., & Bennett, D. M. (2001). The economic impact of breastfeeding. Pediatrics in
Review, 22(8), e111-e115.

Brand, E., Kothari, C., & Stark, M. A. (2011). Factors related to breastfeeding
discontinuation between hospital discharge and 2 weeks postpartum. Journal of
Perinatal Education, 20(1), 36–44.
DHHS. (2011). The Surgeon General's Call to Action to Support Breastfeeding. U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services.

Godfrey, J. R., & Lawrence, R. A. (2010). Toward optimal health: The maternal benefits of
breastfeeding. Journal of Women's Health, 19(9), 1597–1602.

Kramer, M. S., & Kakuma, R. (2012). Optimal duration of exclusive breastfeeding.

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (8).

Ku, C. M., & Chow, S. K. (2010). Costs and benefits of breastfeeding. Pediatrics and
Neonatology, 51(3), 146–152.

Li, R., Fein, S. B., Chen, J., & Grummer-Strawn, L. M. (2008). Why mothers stop
breastfeeding: Mothers’ self-reported reasons for stopping during the first year.
Pediatrics, 122(Supplement 2), S69–S76.

Ma, P., Brewer-Asling, M., & Magnus, J. H. (2013). A case study on the economic impact of
breastfeeding. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 17(1), 9–13.

Piñeiro-Albero, M., et al. (2013). Exclusive breastfeeding: Public health importance. Revista
Española de Salud Pública, 87(3), 245–256.

Rempel, L. A., & Moore, K. C. (2012). The emotional and cognitive experiences of
breastfeeding. Maternal and Child Nutrition, 8(2), 145–158.

Rojjanasrirat, W., & Sousa, V. D. (2010). Perceived benefits and barriers to breastfeeding.
Journal of Perinatal Education, 19(4), 26–35.

Stevens, E. E., Patrick, T. E., & Pickler, R. (2008). A history of infant feeding. Journal of
Perinatal Education, 18(2), 32–39.

Stuebe, A. M., Grewen, K., & Meltzer-Brody, S. (2013). Association between breastfeeding,
maternal stress, and postpartum depression. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 123(1), 123–
131.
Tenfelde, S., Finnegan, L., & Hill, P. D. (2011). Predicting exclusive breastfeeding in a
sample of Hispanic women. Breastfeeding Medicine, 6(3), 113–118.

USBFC. (2014). Breastfeeding Saves Lives. United States Breastfeeding Committee.

Wiener, R. C., & Wiener, M. A. (2011). Breastfeeding among African-American women.

American Journal of Health Studies, 26(1), 35–44.

WHO. (2003). Global Strategy for Infant and Young Child Feeding. World Health
Organization.
 APPENDIX

Appendix I – Sample of Questionnaire Administered

Appendix II – Raw Data Table from Respondents
Appendix III – Charts showing breastfeeding rates by age and practice
Appendix IV – Ethical Clearance Certificate (if applicable)
✅ Hypothesis 1:

 H₀: There is no significant relationship between the knowledge of exclusive

breastfeeding and the practice of exclusive breastfeeding.
 H₁: There is a significant relationship between the knowledge of exclusive breastfeeding
and the practice of exclusive breastfeeding.

Step 1: Present the Observed Data

Let’s construct a contingency table:

Knowledge of EBF Practiced EBF Did Not Practice EBF Total

Knowledgeable (82%) = 123 mothers 40 83 123

Not Knowledgeable (18%) = 27 mothers 8 19 27

Total 48 102 150

Step 2: Compute Expected Frequencies

Formula:
Expected frequency (E) = (Row Total × Column Total) / Grand Total

Let's compute:

For “Knowledgeable” & “Practiced EBF”:

E = (123 × 48) / 150 = 39.36

For “Knowledgeable” & “Did Not Practice EBF”:

E = (123 × 102) / 150 = 83.64

For “Not Knowledgeable” & “Practiced EBF”:

E = (27 × 48) / 150 = 8.64

For “Not Knowledgeable” & “Did Not Practice EBF”:

E = (27 × 102) / 150 = 18.36

Step 3: Apply Chi-Square Formula
χ2=∑(O−E)2E\chi^2 = \sum \frac{(O - E)^2}{E}

Where O = Observed value, E = Expected value

Let’s compute each cell:

Cell O E (O−E)² / E

K & Practiced 40 39.36 (0.64)² / 39.36 = 0.0104

K & Not Practiced 83 83.64 (−0.64)² / 83.64 = 0.0049

Not K & Practiced 8 8.64 (−0.64)² / 8.64 = 0.0474

Not K & Not Practiced 19 18.36 (0.64)² / 18.36 = 0.0223

Total χ² = 0.0104 + 0.0049 + 0.0474 + 0.0223 = 0.085

Step 4: Determine the Critical Value

 Degrees of Freedom (df) = (r − 1) × (c − 1) = (2−1)(2−1) = 1

 Significance level (α) = 0.05
 Critical χ² (df=1, α=0.05) = 3.84

✅ Conclusion

 Calculated χ² = 0.085
 Critical χ² = 3.84

Since 0.085 < 3.84, we fail to reject the null hypothesis.

Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2016). Marketing Management (15th ed.). Pearson Education.
Lawrence, R. A., & Lawrence, R. M. (2016). Breastfeeding: A Guide for the Medical
Profession (8th ed.). Elsevier Health Sciences.

Oxford English Dictionary. (2020). Definition of care. Oxford University Press.

U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). (2010). Definition of a patient in
health care. Retrieved from [Link]

World Health Organization. (1948). Preamble to the Constitution of WHO as adopted by the
International Health Conference.

World Health Organization. (2012). Health Education: Theoretical Concepts, Effective

Strategies and Core Competencies.

World Health Organization. (2020). Exclusive breastfeeding for optimal growth, development
and health of infants. Retrieved from [Link]