0% found this document useful (0 votes)
22 views3 pages

R&D Decisions: Performance, Size, MTBF

The Research and Development (R&D) Department is crucial for product innovation and redesign, impacting marketing and production strategies. R&D decisions influence product positioning on the Perceptual Map, material costs, and project timelines, with new products requiring advance planning for capacity and automation. Additionally, repositioning products can reduce perceived age, enhancing customer interest while also affecting costs related to performance and reliability.

Uploaded by

jonborg24
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
22 views3 pages

R&D Decisions: Performance, Size, MTBF

The Research and Development (R&D) Department is crucial for product innovation and redesign, impacting marketing and production strategies. R&D decisions influence product positioning on the Perceptual Map, material costs, and project timelines, with new products requiring advance planning for capacity and automation. Additionally, repositioning products can reduce perceived age, enhancing customer interest while also affecting costs related to performance and reliability.

Uploaded by

jonborg24
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

10/18/25, 11:55 AM 4.

1 Research & Development (R&D)

4.1 Research & Development (R&D)


| Print |

The Research and Development (R&D) Department oversees invention and redesign. It develops the innovations needed to keep the company ahead of the
competition. R&D is responsible for the “product” portion of the 4 P’s of Marketing (“product, price, place and promotion”). This makes R&D an essential part of
any marketing process.

Your R&D Department invents new products and changes specifications for existing products. Changing size and/or performance repositions a product on the
Perceptual Map. Improving performance and shrinking size moves the product towards the lower right on the map (see “2.1.4 Positioning”).

Your R&D decisions are fundamental to your Marketing and Production plans. In Marketing, R&D addresses:

The positioning of each product inside a market segment on the Perceptual Map
The number of products in each segment
The age of your products
The reliability (MTBF rating) of each product

In Production, R&D affects or is affected by:

The cost of material


The purchase of new facilities to build new products
Automation levels (The higher the automation level, the longer it takes to complete an R&D project.)

All R&D projects begin on January 1. If a product does not have a project already under way, you can launch a new project for that product. However, if a project
begun in a previous year has not finished by December 31 of last year, you will not be able to launch a new project for that product (the decision entry cells in
the R&D area of the Capstone Web Application will be locked).

4.1.1 Changing Performance, Size and MTBF

A repositioning project moves an existing product from one location on the Perceptual Map to a new location, generally (but not always) down and to the right.
Repositioning requires a new size attribute and/or a new performance attribute. To keep up with segment drift, a product must be made smaller (that is,
decrease its size) and better performing (that is, increase its performance).

Positioning Costs

Positioning affects material costs (Figure 4.1). The more advanced the positioning, the higher the cost. The trailing edge of the Low End fine cut has the lowest
positioning cost of approximately $1.00; the leading edge of the High End fine cut has the highest positioning cost of approximately $10.00.

[Link] 1/3
10/18/25, 11:55 AM 4.1 Research & Development (R&D)

Figure 4.1 Approximate Material Positioning Costs: Material costs are driven by two factors,

reliability (MTBF) and positioning. Positioning costs vary depending on the product’s
location on the Perceptual Map. Products placed at the trailing edge of the segments have
a positioning cost of approximately $1.00; products placed on the arc of the leading edge

have a positioning cost of approximately $10.00. Products placed on the arc halfway
between the trailing and leading edges have a positioning material cost of approximately
$5.50. While the segments will drift apart, and the distance between the leading and trailing

edges will increase, the positioning cost range will not change. The leading edge will
always be approximately $10.00, the trailing edge will always be approximately $1.00 and

the midpoint will always be approximately $5.50.

Reliability (MTBF) Costs

The reliability rating, or MTBF, for existing products can be adjusted up or down. Each 1,000 hours of reliability (MTBF) adds $0.30 to the material cost. A
product with 20,000 hours reliability includes $6.00 in reliability costs:

($0.30 * 20,000) / 1,000 = $6.00

Improving positioning and reliability will make a product more appealing to customers, but doing so increases material costs.

Material costs displayed in the spreadsheet and reports are the combined
positioning and reliability (MTBF) costs.

Inventing Sensors

New products are assigned a name (click in the first cell that reads NA in the name column), performance, size and MTBF. Of course, these specifications
should conform to the criteria of the intended market segment. The name of all new products must have the same first letter of the company name.

The Production Department must order production capacity to build the new product one year in advance. Invention projects take at least one year to complete.

All new products require capacity and automation, which should be purchased
by the Production Department in the year prior to the product’s revision

[Link] 2/3
10/18/25, 11:55 AM 4.1 Research & Development (R&D)
(release) date. If you don’t buy the assembly line the year prior to its
introduction, you cannot manufacture your new product!

It is not possible to produce new products prior to the revision date. A new product with a revision date of July 1 will be produced in the second half of the year.
The capacity and automation will stand idle for the first half of the year.

4.1.2 Project Management

Segment circles on the Perceptual Map move at speeds ranging from 0.7 to 1.3 units each year. You must plan to move your products (or retire them) as the
simulation progresses. Generally, the longer the move on the Perceptual Map, the longer it takes the R&D Department to complete the project.

Project lengths can be as short as three months or as long as three years. Project lengths will increase when the company puts two or more products into R&D
at the same time. When this happens each R&D project takes longer. Assembly line automation levels also affect project lengths. R&D project costs are driven
by the amount of time they take to complete. A six-month project costs $500,000; a one-year project costs $1,000,000.

Sensors will continue to produce and sell at the old performance, size and MTBF specifications up until the day the project completes, shown on the
spreadsheet as the revision date. Unsold units built prior to the revision date are reworked free of charge to match the new specifications.

If the project length takes more than a year, the revision date will be reported in the next Capstone Courier. However, the new performance, size and MTBF will
not appear; old product attributes are reported prior to project completion.

When products are created or moved close to existing products, R&D completion times diminish. This is because your R&D Department can take advantage of
existing technology. If the module is active, TQM/Sustainability investments can also decrease R&D times (see “7.1 TQM/Sustainability”). It is important to
verify completion dates after all decisions have been entered. Usually you want repositioning projects to finish in less than a year. For example, consider
breaking an 18-month project into two separate projects, with the first stage ending just before the end of the current year and the second ending halfway
through the following year.

4.1.3 A Sensor’s Age

It is possible for a product to go from an age of 4 years to 2 years. How can that be? When a product is moved on the Perceptual Map, customers perceive the
repositioned product as newer and improved, but not brand new. As a compromise, customers cut the age in half. If the product’s age is 4 years, on the day it is
repositioned, its age becomes 2 years. Therefore, you can manage the age of a product by repositioning the product. It does not matter how far the product
moves. Aging commences from the revision date.

Changing the MTBF alone will not affect a product’s age.

Age criteria vary from segment to segment. For example, if a segment prefers an age of 2 years and the product’s age approaches 3 years, customers will lose
interest (see Figure 3.4). Repositioning the product drops the age from 3 to 1.5 years, and customers will become interested again.

Log into the Capstone Web Application and click the Decisions menu. Select
Research & Development. To change a product’s performance, enter a number
in the New Pfmn cell; to change its size, enter a number in the New Size cell. To
change the reliability rating, enter a number in the MTBF cell. As you vary the
specifications, observe the effect upon the revision date, project cost, material
cost and age.

The Rehearsal Tutorial’s R&D Tactics show you how to run the department. Log
in at the Capsim website and go to your Dashboard for information about the
Rehearsal.

[Link] 3/3

Common questions

Powered by AI

Positioning material costs are determined by the product’s location on the Perceptual Map. Products positioned at the leading edge of market segments have higher material costs, approximately $10.00, due to advanced positioning, while those at the trailing edge have costs around $1.00. Products in the midpoint incur $5.50 in positioning costs. These varying costs arise because advanced positioning requires greater investment in technology and resources to meet market demands. Additionally, increased reliability (MTBF) adds $0.30 per 1,000 hours to the cost. Collectively, positioning and MTBF costs determine the overall material cost of a product .

To strategically reduce R&D project lengths while working on multiple projects, companies can sequence projects to ensure minimal overlap and subsequent resource strain. Employing modular project approaches, where product improvements build on existing technologies, can also accelerate completion times. Investing in TQM/Sustainability can optimize processes and reduce durations. Additionally, maintaining flexible resource allocation and prioritizing projects that align with immediate business goals can enhance efficiency and project throughput .

Higher automation levels tend to extend R&D project completion times, as more automated systems require longer to implement changes to product lines. Companies can mitigate these extended durations by strategically timing new projects to avoid overlap, thus reducing congestion in R&D resource needs. Additionally, investing in TQM/Sustainability initiatives can lead to shorter project times by leveraging improved processes and efficiencies. Breaking longer projects into stages, with consideration for optimal completion dates, can also expedite time-to-market for new product specifications .

When repositioning a product, strategic considerations include the expected market segment drift speed and the customer expectations in terms of product age and specifications. A product should ideally be repositioned to better align with customer preferences, increasing performance and decreasing size to meet the lower right movement on the Perceptual Map. The cost implications related to repositioning, such as changes to material costs owing to advanced positioning and adjustments in MTBF, must also be planned for financially. Furthermore, understanding the time required for R&D projects under current production capacity and automation levels is crucial, as these factors affect the project’s timeline and costs .

Inventing sensors as new products involves challenges such as aligning specifications with market segment requirements, managing the lead time for completion due to R&D and production setup needs, and ensuring appropriate investment in capacity and automation. Considerations include ensuring the product name adheres to naming conventions, planning the release date to coincide with market demand, and pre-ordering production resources a year ahead. These steps are vital for minimizing idle time and maximizing market impact upon launch .

It is crucial to plan for production capacity and automation in advance of a new product launch to ensure manufacturing capabilities align with the new product's production demands. The Production Department must order capacity and decide on automation levels a year prior to the product’s introduction because new products cannot be manufactured without the necessary infrastructure. This pre-planning prevents idle resources and mitigates the risk of production delays, allowing for smooth transition and efficiency once the product is released .

Not completing R&D projects before the year's end can prevent new product launches from proceeding as planned, leading to missed market opportunities and potential revenue loss. Without timely completion, further developments or adjustments to the product cannot commence due to locked decision entry cells in the R&D area. This could also result in operational disruptions if production and marketing plans were based on the expected availability of the new product, thereby affecting the company’s market competitiveness and strategic positioning negatively .

During repositioning, a product's age is effectively halved, which affects customer perception by making the product appear newer and more innovative, thereby aligning with customer preferences for certain age ranges. This perceived reduction in age is beneficial in segments that favor newer products, as it revitalizes customer interest. However, simply changing the MTBF does not alter a product's age. It's crucial to manage age perception actively by repositioning to maintain competitiveness and customer engagement .

The R&D department is integral to both marketing and production strategies. It manages the product aspect of the 4 Ps of Marketing by innovating new products and altering existing product specifications to enhance market positioning. In marketing, R&D determines a product's position on the Perceptual Map, affects the size and number of products in each market segment, and influences product age and reliability. In production, R&D decisions impact material costs, production capabilities, and automation levels. R&D projects affect production costs based on material costs linked to product positioning and reliability (MTBF).

Aligning R&D decisions with the company’s strategic goals is significant because it ensures that innovation supports broader business objectives like market leadership, customer satisfaction, and financial performance. R&D's influence on product development, market positioning, and cost structures underlines the importance of strategic alignment. Decisions regarding product specifications, cost management, and project timelines must be made with awareness of competitive strategies and customer needs to ensure that R&D contributions drive sustainable growth and profitability .

You might also like