0% found this document useful (0 votes)
5 views6 pages

Network Analysis and Transfer Functions

The document discusses various network functions and transformations involving electrical circuits, including impedance and transfer functions. It provides equations and calculations for voltage ratios, driving point impedance, and zeros and poles of functions. The analysis includes transformed networks and their characteristics, along with specific examples and solutions for different configurations.

Uploaded by

srikanth108
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
5 views6 pages

Network Analysis and Transfer Functions

The document discusses various network functions and transformations involving electrical circuits, including impedance and transfer functions. It provides equations and calculations for voltage ratios, driving point impedance, and zeros and poles of functions. The analysis includes transformed networks and their characteristics, along with specific examples and solutions for different configurations.

Uploaded by

srikanth108
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

11 Network Functions

11.1 I1 5Ω 2Ω I2 = 0  5s 2 + 5s + 5 + 2 s 2 + 2 s 

V1 =   V2
+ +  2s 

1/2F  7s2 + 7s + 5 
2H ⇒ V1 =   V2
V1 V2  2s 
_ _ V2 2s
V0 Hage transfer ratio = 2
V1 7s + 7s + 5
The transformed N/W is as:
I1 5Ω 2Ω I2 = 0  7s2 + 7s + 5 
Va Vb   V2
V1  2s 
+ Ib + Driving point impedance, =
I1  s + 1 + s2 
 2 s  V2
2/s  
2s
V1 V2 V1 7s2 + 7s + 5
=
_ _ I1 s2 + s + 1

V2

V b = V2 Transfer impedance
I1
V2 ∆V2
Ib = =  5 + 1 + s2 
2 2 ⇒ I1 =   V2
5  2s 
Va = 2Ib + V2
V2 2s
⇒ = 2
 sV2  I1 5 + s +1
= 2   + V2
 2 
= (s + 1)V2 11.3 I1 2H 1H I2 = 0
1 2

V1 = 5I1 + Va  (i) + +
Va 2F 2F
I1 = + Ib V1 V2
2s
( s + 1)V2 sV2
_ _
= +
2s 2 1ʹ 2ʹ
( s + 1 + s )V
2
2 The transformed N/W is shown below:
=
2s
Using (i) eqn.
5

V1 =  s + 1 + s 2  V2 + ( s + 1)V2
2s 

[Link] 1 1/14/2023 12:27:58 PM


2

2s Va 1s Vb I2 = 0 6±2 5
1 2 =
+ I1 Ib + 2
−6 ± 4.47
V1 V2 =
2
1/2s 1/2s
S = –5.235 and s = -0.765
_ _
1ʹ 2ʹ jω

Vb = V2 2j
V2 j
Ib = = V2 ⋅ 2 s –5.225 –0.765
1
2s –5 –4 –3 –2 –1 –j
Va = s ⋅ I b + V2 –2j

= [ s ⋅ 2 s + 1]V2 –jω
Va = (2s2 + 1)V2 This is the procedure which is follow in all supports of
Va 11.5 (ii) onwards.
I1 = + Ib
1
(s 2
+ 4 ) ( s + 1)
2s 11.5 (viii) F(S) =
(s 2
+ 1)( s 2 + 2 s + 5 )
= 2s[2s + 1]V2 + 2sV2
2

The function F(S) has zero at s = –2j and s = + 2j and s


= [403 + 2s + 2s]V2 = –1 and poles at
I1 = [4s3 + 4s]V2 S = –j and s = +j and also
V1 = 2sI1 + Va
S2 + 2s + 5 = 0
= 2s[4s + 4s]V2 + [2s + 1]V2
3 2
=2 ± 4 − 20
= (3s4 + 8s2)V2 + [2s2 + 1]V2 S=
2
= [3s4 + 10s2 + 1]V2
−2 ± −16
Open – CKT voltage ratio, =
2
V −2 ± 4 j
G2 1 = 1 =8s 4 + 10 s 2 + 1 = =−1 ± 2 j
V2 2

S = –1 – 2j and s = –1 + 2j
V1
Open CKT transfer impedance Z 21 = is not
I2 3j
calculated because I2 = 0 because of open CKT. (–1+2j)
2j
Hence, Z 21 is not obtained. j
1 2 3 4
2
s +4 –1 o
11.5 (i) F(S) = 2 –j
s + 6s + 4
The function F(s) has zero at s = -2j and s = +2j and (–1–2j) –2j
poles at s2 + 6s + 4 = 0 –3j
−6 ± 36 − 16
S =
2

−6 ± 20
=
2

[Link] 2 1/14/2023 12:28:00 PM


3

11.7 5Ω 10 Ω jω

–0.014
–0.027
2(s) 10 F 5F
o
–0.03 –0.02 –0.01

The transformed N/W as


5 10 I1 2H
11.9
+ +
2(s) 1/10s 1/5s
V2 1Ω
V1 1F 1F
_
_
1  10 + 1 
5+  
10 s  5s  The N/W is redrawn as
Z(S) =
1 10 + 1
+ 2H
10 s 5s I1 VA Vb I2
5 1 1 1 + Ib +
+ 50 + + +
10 s s s 50 s 2
=
1 1 V2
+ 10 + V1 1Ω
10 s 5s 1/s 1/s
_
2s + 2500s 2 + 50s + 50s + 1 _
50s 2 5s
=
1 + 100 s + 2
10 s I2 = − =

2500 s 2 + 105s + 1 Vb Vb
= +
5s (100 s + 3) Ib =
1 1
5
25002 + 105s + 1
Z(S) = = 5Vb + Vb
500 s 2 + 15s
The function has zero at = (5 + 1)Vb = (5 + 1)V2

2500s2 + 105s + 1 = 0 Vb = –I2


Vb = V2
−105 ± 11025 − 10000
s = Va = 2sIb + V2
5000
= 2s(s + 1)Va + V2
−105 ± 1025
= = (2s2 + 2s + 1) V2
5000
V1 = I1 + Va  (i)
−105 ± 32.01
= Va
5000 I1 = + Ib
S = –0.027 and s = -0.014 1
5
Poles at 500s2 + 15s = 0
= 5Va + Ib
S = 0 and 500s = -15
I1 = 5(2s2 + 2s + 1)V2 + (s + 1) V2
15
S = − = -0.03 = (2s2 + 2s2 + s + s + 1)V2
500
= (2s3 + 2s2 + 2s + 1)V2

[Link] 3 1/14/2023 12:28:01 PM


4

Using (i) The network is redrawn as:


V1 = (2s + 2s + 2s + 1) V2 + (2s + 2s + 1)V2
3 2 2
2s 4s
I1 Va I2
V1 = (2s + 4s + 4s + 2)V2 3 2
+ +
= 2(s3 + 2s2 + 2s + 1)V2
V2 1 1/2s 1/s V2
= 2 s 3 + 2 s 2 + 2 s + 1 V1
V1 ( )
V1  2 ( s 3 + 2 s 2 + 2 s + 1)  V2 _ _
 
=
I1 ( 2 s 3
+ 2 s 2
+ 2 s + 1)2
V For further solution refer to 11.9.

2 ( s 3 + 2 s 2 + 2 s + 1) 11.15
V1
=
I1 2s3 + 2s 2 + 2s + 1 R
z(s)
11.11 1F 2F 1/2s
I1
Ls
+ +

V2
V1 1H 1H Given –

Poles -
( −1 ± j 4 )
_ _
Zeros = –2
The network is redrawn as
Z(j1) = 1
1/s 1/s
I1 Va I2 1
( LS + R )
+ + CS

Z(S) = 1
LS + R +
V2 CS
V1 s s
LS + R
=
_ LCS 2 + RCS + 1
_

1 R
−V2 S + 
C L
I2 = S
Z(S) =
RS 1
S2 + +
Now, refer to 11.9 (For further procedure and solution.) L LC
11.13. I1 2H 4H I2 For Z(S) =
+ + Zero is at S = –2 and poles at s = –1 – j4 & s = –1 + j4
s+2
2F 1F V2 Z(S) = H

V1 ( s + 1 + j 4)( s + 1 − j 4)

H ( s + 2) H ( s + 2)
_ _ = =
(s + 1) − ( j 4 )
2
2 2
s 2 + 2 s + 1 + 16

H ( s + 2)
= 2
s + 2 s + 17

[Link] 4 1/14/2023 12:28:03 PM


5

Z(j0) = 1 jω jω
 2
1 = H  17 
 
17
H = o o
2 –7 –5 –2 σ –7 –5 –2 σ
17  s+2 

Z(S) =  2  (ii)
2  s + 2 s + 17 

Comparing eqn (i) and (ii) and solving we get
1 17 (i) (ii)
=
C 2  3∠0° 
From (i) K1 = 5  =3
2  5∠0° 
C = F
17  2∠180° 
1 From (ii) K2 = 5  =2
= 17  5∠180° 
LC
1 3 2
L = V(S) = +
C ⋅17 5+ 2 5+7
Taking inverse Laplace transform,
1
L = H V(t) = 3e-2t + 2e-7t
2
R = 2L 20
11.19 (i) F(s) =
R = 1W s ( s + 2 )( s + 10 )

5( s + 5) Write F(s) in standard form as


11.17 V(S) =
( s + 2 )( s + 7 ) 20
F(s) =
 Here, degree of denominator is greater than the degree  s  s 
2 × 10 × s  + 1  + 1
of numerator. So, there is no need of division by partial  2   10 
traction. Thus, we get
20
By partial fraction expansion: =
20 s (1 + 0.5s )(1 + 0.15 )
K1 K
V(S) = + 2 1
s+2 s+7 =
s (1 + 0.5s )(1 + 0.1s )
K1 and K2 can be evaluated from pole – zero diagram.
jω Putting
jω s = jw
1
F(j) =
jw (1.0.5 jw )(1 + 0.1 jw )

o σ 20o log |F(jw)| =σ20 log 1 – 20 log |jw| - 20 log (1 + 0.5


–7 –5 –2 –7 –5 –2
jw)
20 log (1 + 0.1 jw)
This fraction is of type 1 system
(i) (ii)
k=1

Starting point w > k
W = 1
Starting slope = - 20 ds/ducade.
Corner frequency

[Link] 5 1/14/2023 12:28:04 PM


6

1 F(s) is of type 0 system


CF2 = = 2 (Pole)
0.5 Starting point 20 log10k
1 K = ?
CF1 = = 10 (Pole)
0.1 Starting slope = 0 dB/decade
This plot is drawn from starting point i.e. w = 1 with a From (i), we obtain,
slope of -20 dB/decade upto CF1 i.e. 10 and then slope 20 log|J(jw)| = 20 log 0.3 – 20 log (jw + 1) – 20 log (3
change to -40 dB/decade because of corner frequency jw + 1) + 20 lo (jw)
of pole and then this slope is continue upto CF2 i.e. 2
and then again slope change to – 60 dB/decade because 1 10
CF1 = = = 3.33 (zero)
of pole again. 0.3 3
After drawn these plot on semi log paper. 1
CF2 = = 1 = (pole)
We obtain gain margin & phase margin as 1

−1  jw  −1  jw  1
φ(w) = −90° − tan   − tan   CF2 = = 0.33 (pole)
 2   10  3
From this we draw magnitude plot on semi log paper
−1  jw  −1  jw  & than draw phase on semi log paper & then obtain
= −90° − tan   − tan  
 2   10  phase margin and gain margin.
Phase margin = 180° + f From 11.19 (iii) Onwards follow the similar procedure
of 11.19 (i) and then draw it on semi log paper.
Gain margin = ?
0.3s
(ii) F(s) =
( s + 1)( 3s + 1)
Putting s = jw
0.3 jw
F(jw) = (i)
( jw + 1)( 3 jw + 1)

[Link] 6 1/14/2023 12:28:05 PM

You might also like