0% found this document useful (0 votes)
27 views6 pages

Partial vs Full Goodwill Explained

Chapter 3 covers business combinations, focusing on estimating goodwill, reverse acquisitions, and differences in accounting frameworks (Full PFRS, PFRS for SMEs, and PFRS for SEs). Goodwill can be calculated using either the Full or Partial Goodwill methods, with reverse acquisitions treating the smaller company as the accounting acquirer. The chapter also outlines the varying complexities and requirements of accounting for business combinations across different PFRS frameworks.
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
27 views6 pages

Partial vs Full Goodwill Explained

Chapter 3 covers business combinations, focusing on estimating goodwill, reverse acquisitions, and differences in accounting frameworks (Full PFRS, PFRS for SMEs, and PFRS for SEs). Goodwill can be calculated using either the Full or Partial Goodwill methods, with reverse acquisitions treating the smaller company as the accounting acquirer. The chapter also outlines the varying complexities and requirements of accounting for business combinations across different PFRS frameworks.
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Chapter 3 – Business Combinations (Part 3)

Learning Objectives
After completing this chapter, students should be able to:
1. Apply the methods of estimating goodwill.
2. Account for reverse acquisitions.
3. Differentiate the accounting for business combinations between:
 Full PFRS (Philippine Financial Reporting Standards)
 PFRS for SMEs (Small and Medium-sized Entities)
 PFRS for SEs (Small Entities Standard)

1. Goodwill in Business Combinations


Definition (PFRS 3, par. 32)
Goodwill represents the excess of the consideration transferred, plus the fair value of non-controlling
interest (NCI), plus the fair value of any previously held interest, over the net assets acquired (at fair
value).

Goodwill = Consideration Transferred +NCI +Fair Value of Previously Held Interest -Net Assets Acquired
(FV)

If the result is negative, it is recognized as a gain on bargain purchasein profit or loss.

Methods of Estimating Goodwill


There are two approachesto measuring goodwill, depending on how the Non-Controlling Interest (NCI)is
measured:

1. Full Goodwill Method (Fair Value Method)


 NCI is measured at its fair value.
 Goodwill includes both the parents and the NCIs share.

Goodwill = Consideration Transferred + Fair Value of NCI - Net Assets Acquired (FV)

2. Partial Goodwill Method (Proportionate Share Method)


 NCI is measured at its proportionate share of the net assets.
 Goodwill includes only the parents share.

Goodwill = Consideration Transferred - Parents Share in Net Assets Acquired (FV)

Illustration – Estimating Goodwill


Example 1: Full Goodwill Method

 Parent Co. acquires 80% of Subsidiary Co. for ₱4,000,000.


 FV of Subsidiarys net assets = ₱4,200,000.
 FV of NCI (20%) = ₱1,200,000.

Goodwill = 4,000,000 + 1,200,000 - 4,200,000 = ₱1,000,000

Example 2: Partial Goodwill Method

 Same data, but NCI measured at 20% of net assets (₱4,200,000 × 20% = ₱840,000).

Goodwill = 4,000,000 - (80\% × 4,200,000) = 4,000,000 - 3,360,000 = ₱640,000

➡ Notice that goodwill is higher under full goodwill methodbecause it recognizes the NCIs portion of
goodwill.
2. Reverse Acquisitions
Definition
A reverse acquisition occurs when the legal acquirer (the entity issuing shares)is actually the accounting
acquiree, and the legal acquireeis the accounting acquirer.

 Legal Acquirer: The company that issues shares and legally acquires the other.
 Accounting Acquirer: The company whose owners obtain control after the combination.

This usually happens when a smaller company acquires a larger companybut uses the larger companys
legal structure.

Illustration – Reverse Acquisition


 Company A (smaller) acquires Company B (larger) by issuing shares.
 After the combination, shareholders of B own 60%of the new entity.
 Although A issued the shares, Bs shareholders gained control.

Accounting treatment:

 Company B is treated as the accounting acquirer.


 The consolidated FS will be presented as if Company B acquired Company A.
 However, the legal formshows Company A as the parent.

3. Differences in Business Combinations Across Frameworks


A. Full PFRS (PFRS 3 – Business Combinations)
 Requires acquisition method: identify acquirer, measure assets &liabilities at FV, recognize
goodwill/bargain purchase.
 Allows both full goodwilland partial goodwillmethods.
 Extensive disclosure requirements.
 Applies to publicly accountable entities.

B. PFRS for SMEs


 Simpler rules.
 Uses purchase method(similar to acquisition method).
 NCI always measured at proportionate shareof net assets (partial goodwill only).
 Fewer disclosure requirements.
 Applies to non-publicly accountable SMEs.

C. PFRS for SEs (Small Entities)


 Simplified even further.
 Business combinations may be accounted for using the pooling of interest method(book values
used, no goodwill).
 If goodwill arises, amortized systematically (not tested annually for impairment).
 Tailored for very small enterprisesin the Philippines.
Comparison Table
Aspect Full PFRS PFRS for SMEs PFRS for SEs

Method Acquisition Method Purchase Method (similar) Pooling of Interest

NCI FV (full goodwill) or Proportionate share only Not applicable


Measurement Proportionate (partial)

Goodwill Full or Partial Partial only Usually avoided; if


any, amortized

Bargain Recognized in P&L Recognized in P&L Rare


Purchase

Disclosure Extensive Moderate Minimal

Impairment of Annual impairment test Amortized (≤10 yrs) if Amortized


Goodwill reliable estimate not
available

Key Takeaways
 Goodwill can be measured using the fullor partialgoodwill methods.
 A reverse acquisitionoccurs when the legal acquirer is not the accounting acquirer.
 Full PFRSis complex and detailed, PFRS for SMEsis simplified, and PFRS for SEsis the most basic.

Practice Set: Business Combinations (PFRS 3)


Problem 1 — Goodwill: Full vs Partial (baseline)
Scenario
On 1/1/20X5, Polar Co. acquires 75%of Sigma Co. for ₱9,000,000cash. The fair value (FV) of Sigmas
identifiable net assetsis ₱10,800,000. The FV of NCI (25%)at the date is ₱3,100,000.

Required
Compute goodwill under (a) full goodwilland (b) partial goodwill.

Solution

 Full goodwill
Goodwill = Consideration + FV(NCI) − FV(net assets)
= 9,000,000 + 3,100,000 − 10,800,000
= ₱1,300,000

 Partial goodwill(NCI measured at proportionate share of net assets)


Goodwill = Consideration − Parents share of FV(net assets)
= 9,000,000 − (75% × 10,800,000)
= 9,000,000 − 8,100,000
= ₱900,000

Goodwill is higher under the full method because it includes NCIs share of goodwill.
Problem 2 — Step acquisition with remeasurement of previously
held interest
Scenario
On 6/30/20X5, Delta Co. increases its interest in Echo Co. from 25%to 75%by buying an additional 50%for
₱6,000,000.
 Carrying amount of the existing 25%investment: ₱2,000,000.
 FV of the 25%at acquisition date: ₱2,700,000.
 FV of Echos identifiable net assetsat acquisition date: ₱8,000,000.
 FV of NCI (25%)at acquisition date: ₱2,500,000.

Required
(a) Recognize the remeasurement gain.
(b) Compute goodwill under fulland partialgoodwill.

Solution
(a) Remeasurement gain(PFRS 3):
FV of previously held 25% − carrying amount = 2,700,000 − 2,000,000 = ₱700,000 (gain in P/L).

(b) Goodwill
 Full goodwill
Goodwill = Consideration (new 50%) + FV(NCI) + FV(prev. 25%) − FV(net assets)
= 6,000,000 + 2,500,000 + 2,700,000 − 8,000,000
= ₱3,200,000

 Partial goodwill(NCI at proportionate share: 25% × 8,000,000 = 2,000,000; formula excludes NCI
explicitly)
Goodwill = [Consideration for new + FV(prev. interest)] − Parents share of FV(net assets)
Parents share = 75% × 8,000,000 = 6,000,000
Goodwill = (6,000,000 + 2,700,000) − 6,000,000
= ₱2,700,000

Notes (consolidation perspective)


 Recognize the ₱700,000 gainin profit or loss from remeasuring the prior 25%.
 Use FV of the prior interest in the goodwill computation.

Problem 3 — Contingent consideration at initial recognition


Scenario
On 3/31/20X5, Apex Co. acquires 60%of Nova Co. for ₱4,000,000cash pluscontingent consideration with a
FV of ₱800,000.
 FV of Novas net assetsat acquisition: ₱6,500,000.
 FV of NCI (40%)at acquisition: ₱2,600,000.

Required
Compute goodwill under (a) full goodwill and (b) partial goodwill.

SolutionTotal consideration transferred (parent) = 4,000,000 + 800,000 = ₱4,800,000.


 Full goodwill
Goodwill = Consideration + FV(NCI) − FV(net assets)
= 4,800,000 + 2,600,000 − 6,500,000
= ₱900,000

 Partial goodwill
Goodwill = Consideration − Parents share of FV(net assets)
Parents share = 60% × 6,500,000 = 3,900,000
Goodwill = 4,800,000 − 3,900,000 = ₱900,000

Here, both methods coincidentally give the same goodwill.


Problem 4 — Bargain purchase (negative goodwill)
Scenario
On 9/30/20X5, Orion Co. acquires 100%of Vega Co. for ₱9,200,000. The FV of Vegas identifiable net
assetsis ₱10,000,000.

Required
Determine the gain on bargain purchase and indicate its treatment.

SolutionGoodwill= Consideration − FV(net assets) = 9,200,000 − 10,000,000 = (₱800,000)negative.


Under PFRS 3, recognize ₱800,000 gain on bargain purchasein profit or loss(after reassessing ID of
assets/liabilities and measurement).

Problem 5 — Reverse acquisition (worked, with deemed


consideration)
Scenario
 Legal parent / accounting acquiree:ListedCo (a listed shell).
 FV of its identifiable net assets at acquisition: ₱20,000,000.
Legal subsidiary / accounting acquirer:StartupCo.
 FV of StartupCos equity (pre-combination): ₱120,000,000.
The transaction is structured so that former owners of StartupCo obtain 60%of the post-combination
voting rights; ListedCos owners hold 40%after the combination. ListedCo issues shares to StartupCos
owners to achieve this.

Required
(a) Identify the accounting acquirer.
(b) Determine the deemed considerationand compute goodwillat acquisition date.
(c) Show the acquisition-date consolidation journal (high level).

Solution(a) Accounting acquirer:StartupCo (its owners obtain control: 60%).


Legal acquirer:ListedCo (issued shares). This is a reverse acquisition.

(b) Deemed consideration(from the perspective of the accounting acquirer, StartupCo):


Under PFRS 3, measure the consideration as the FV of the equity interests that the accounting acquirer
would have had to issueto give ListedCos owners the same 40%post-combination interest.

If StartupCos equity FV (100%) = ₱120,000,000 and represents 60%post-combination, then 100%post-


combination FV basis = 120,000,000 / 60% = ₱200,000,000.
Thus, the deemed consideration(for 40%) = 40% × 200,000,000 = ₱80,000,000.

Goodwill(reverse acquisition measured against ListedCosnet assets):


Goodwill = Deemed consideration − FV(ListedCo net assets)
= 80,000,000 − 20,000,000
= ₱60,000,000

(c) Acquisition-date consolidation journal (schematic)


From StartupCo (accounting acquirer) viewpoint acquiring ListedCo (accounting acquiree):

Recognize ListedCos identifiable net assets at FV and goodwill, with equity presented as that of ListedCo
(legal parent).
Dr Identifiable net assets – ListedCo (FV) 20,000,000
Dr Goodwill 60,000,000
Cr Equity (deemed shares issuedby StartupCo) 80,000,000

Presentation note: In the consolidated FS, equity captionsreflect the legal parents (ListedCos)equity
structure, but amounts are derived from the accounting acquirer (StartupCo), adjusted for the deemed
issuance. Pre-combination comparative figures are those of StartupCo.

Problem 6 — Goodwill with measurement of NCI at proportionate


share (SME lens)
Scenario
Parent acquires 80%of Sub on 12/31/20X5 for ₱5,600,000. FV of Subs identifiable net assets is
₱6,500,000. For this problem, assume NCI is measured at proportionate share(i.e., partial goodwill).

Required
Compute goodwill and the recognized NCI at acquisition.

Solution

 Goodwill (partial)= Consideration − Parents share of FV(net assets)


= 5,600,000 − (80% × 6,500,000)
= 5,600,000 − 5,200,000
= ₱400,000

 NCI(at proportionate share) = 20% × 6,500,000 = ₱1,300,000

Journal Entry Templates (Consolidation, acquisition date)


Standard acquisition (full goodwill):
Dr Identifiable assets (FV)
Dr Goodwill
Cr Identifiable liabilities (FV)
Cr Cash / Consideration transferred
Cr NCI (FV)

Standard acquisition (partial goodwill):


Dr Identifiable assets (FV)
Dr Goodwill (parents share only)
Cr Identifiable liabilities (FV)
Cr Cash / Consideration transferred
Cr NCI (proportionate share of net assets)

Step acquisition (remeasure prior interest):


Dr Investment in Sub (to FV of prior interest)
Cr Gain on remeasurement (P/L)

Bargain purchase:
Dr Identifiable assets (FV)
Cr Identifiable liabilities (FV)
Cr Consideration transferred
Cr Gain on bargain purchase (P/L)

Common questions

Powered by AI

A reverse acquisition illustrates the divergence between the legal and accounting perspectives by allowing an entity to legally acquire another while still being recognized as the acquiree from an accounting standpoint. This occurs when the acquired company (legal acquirer) is significantly smaller and less controlling than the acquiring company (legal acquiree), whose owners gain control in substance. Such setups highlight the principle wherein control, rather than legal title, dictates accounting treatment, reflecting that economic reality should form the basis of financial representation. This showcases the importance of judging transactions based on substantive control influences rather than mere legal structures .

During a step acquisition, a remeasurement gain arises when increasing ownership in an acquiree. The previously held equity interest is revalued at its fair value at the acquisition date before calculating goodwill. The steps involve: 1) Determine the fair value of previously held equity interest at the acquisition date. 2) Compare this fair value to the carrying amount in the acquirer's books. 3) Recognize any positive difference as a remeasurement gain in profit or loss. This ensures that valuation reflects current market conditions and adjusts goodwill computation by incorporating the remeasured prior interest value .

A bargain purchase results in a gain on profit or loss because the consideration paid is less than the fair value of the net assets acquired. Under PFRS 3, this occurs when the negative difference between the consideration and the fair value of net identifiable assets reflects a gain, which should be recognized in profit or loss after reassessing the identification of acquired assets/liabilities and checking their measurement accuracy. This ensures that the gain is justifiable and accurately reflects an enhancement of assets acquired below their fair value .

Two methods of goodwill calculation, the Full Goodwill and Partial Goodwill Methods, might yield the same results when the total consideration transferred, inclusive of contingent considerations, equals the parent's share of net assets. This scenario can occur when contingent considerations align the parent’s effective cost and related asset share such that additional NCI or fair value excesses do not result in differential goodwill amounts under varying methods. Specifically, both methods would show equal goodwill when the parent's effective interest perfectly matches the net assets' valuation plus contingent consideration impact, producing equivalence in outcome from different evaluation perspectives .

In a reverse acquisition, the legal acquirer becomes the accounting acquiree, and the legal acquiree becomes the accounting acquirer. This means that the financial statements are prepared from the perspective of the accounting acquirer, presenting as if it acquired the legal acquirer. This impacts the consolidation process and the recognition of goodwill, where the accounting acquirer's assets and liabilities are measured at fair value, but the legal acquirer's equity structure is used for presentation. Consequently, the transaction may affect the earnings and net assets position, requiring careful examination to appropriately recognize assets, liabilities, and equity interests .

PFRS for SEs distinguishes itself from Full PFRS by providing a simplified approach, using the pooling of interest method rather than the acquisition method, thereby avoiding the recognition of goodwill. If goodwill does arise, it is amortized systematically and not tested annually for impairment. This standard is tailored for very small enterprises and involves minimal disclosure requirements and avoids complex fair value measurements, focusing instead on practicality and ease of use .

Contingent consideration affects the calculation of goodwill by becoming part of the total consideration transferred at the acquisition date. This amount, often dependent on future events, is included at its fair value in the calculation alongside other consideration forms. The fair value of contingent consideration impacts the amount recognized as goodwill because it adjusts both the initial cost recorded and the resulting goodwill recognized. The contingent nature requires it to be reassessed and adjusted in subsequent periods, leading to variations in reported goodwill and impacting financial outcomes based on future performance or criteria triggers tied to the acquisition agreement .

Under PFRS for SEs, goodwill is typically avoided due to the pooling of interest method used; however, if goodwill arises, it must be amortized rather than subjected to annual impairment tests as required under Full PFRS. Full PFRS requires entities to test goodwill annually for impairment and adjust accordingly, reflecting any decline in recoverable value. PFRS for SEs, focusing on smaller entities, simplifies this by allowing systematic amortization of goodwill, thereby reducing complexity and aligning with the entities' characteristics and reporting needs .

The PFRS for SMEs uses a simpler purchase method, similar to the acquisition method under Full PFRS, but with fewer disclosure requirements. It allows only the Partial Goodwill Method where NCI is always measured at its proportionate share, not giving an option for Full Goodwill Method. The PFRS for SMEs applies to non-publicly accountable enterprises and has reduced complexity, focusing on practicality for smaller entities .

The primary difference lies in how Non-Controlling Interest (NCI) is measured. The Full Goodwill Method measures NCI at its fair value and includes both the parent's and NCIs' share in the goodwill calculation. On the other hand, the Partial Goodwill Method measures NCI at its proportionate share of the net assets, including only the parent's share in goodwill. As a result, goodwill is higher under the full goodwill method because it recognizes the NCI's portion of goodwill .

You might also like