Organic Chemistry Hybridization Practice
Organic Chemistry Hybridization Practice
Summer 2017
Organic Chemistry I
1. The molecule shown below is Biotin, a necessary vitamin for cell growth.
a. Draw in all lone pairs in this molecule consistent with the bonding rules. All
atoms are uncharged.
See above
b. Give the bond angles for angle a and b. Assume no distortions from lone pairs
or other effect.
a: 120o; b: 109o
a. Draw in all lone pairs in this molecule consistent with the bonding rules. All
atoms are uncharged.
d. What is the geometry of 6-membered ring on the left of the structure above?
All the carbon atoms in the ring are trigonal planar, so all the carbons are
coplanar, or in simple terms the ring is flat.
Just for fun, give the name of these amino acids. You don’t have to know these
for my course, I just thought it would be fun since you are doing this in Bio 24
A. B.
A: sp3 B: sp2
B, maximum distance, 120o, between bonding pairs and Cl atoms when in the
sp2 hybridization and trigonal planar geometry
5. Draw a complete orbital picture for formaldehyde, CH2O and label hybridized
orbitals (sp3, sp2 or sp), sigma and pi bonds and p-orbitals that overlap to form
any pi bonds.
Top View
Side View
6. Two possible charged states for carbon are +1 and -1, which we call a
carbocation and a carbanion, respectively. Example structures for each of these
charged species are given below. Determine the hybridization for both structures
and draw an orbital picture. Note: you can do this problem now, even though we
have not discussed formal charge-we will cover that topic next week. Also, all
the electrons are shown, the carbon in the carbocation has only three bonds and
no lone pair.
Bonding Rules and Lewis Structures Practice Problems-Key
1. Given what you know about the bonding rules for nonmetals, use the molecule
formula to complete the following structures. Also draw in any lone pair electrons
to complete the structures.
2. Complete the molecular formulas below and draw a Lewis structure for the
compound.
3. Draw the Lewis structure for the following molecular and condensed formulas.
N2 H4 CH3CO2H
BF3 CH3OCH3
4. Given the molecular formulas and the templates given, complete the following
Lewis structures.
Skeletal drawings in organic chemistry
Rules
1. Carbon atoms are represented by the ends of lines or the junctions between lines
without using the chemical symbol, C. The lines represent the bonds between carbon
atoms.
2. Hydrogen atoms attached to carbon atoms are not shown explicitly. Sufficient
hydrogen atoms are assumed to be attached to the carbons so that each carbon has four
bonds. Be sure to count the correct number of bonds - double bonds count as two bonds
and triple bonds count as three bonds.
3. All other types of atoms (e.g. O, S, N, Cl) are shown explicitly.
4. Hydrogens attached to atoms other than carbon are always shown explicitly.
5. Nonbonding electron pairs on atoms are not typically shown. Sufficient nonbonding
pairs are assumed so that each atom has a full outer shell of 8 electrons.
Note- at times carbon atoms, assumed hydrogens and nonbonding electron pairs will be
shown for emphasis.
Example and Practice – Convert the following Lewis structures to skeletal drawings and
convert the following skeletal drawings to a complete Lewis structures.
-11-
-12-
Key:
-13-
Formal Charge Practice: Key
1. For the following compounds, determine the formal charge for all the heteroatoms (O, N and S).
All nonbonding electrons are shown. For carbon atoms, assume zero charge and fill in the correct
number of assumed hydrogens. Note: there are no assumed electrons on carbon, they have to be
explicitly shown with nonbonding electrons and/or with a charge notation.
2. For the following compounds, determine the charge for all the atoms. All assumed hydrogens and
nonbonding electrons are shown.
-14-
3. For the following compounds, all charges are shown as they might typically be in texts or the
chemical literature. Add to these structures the correct number of assumed nonbonding electrons
and hydrogens consistent with the formal charges as shown. Recall from the drawing conventions,
hydrogens are always shown on heteroatoms (O, N and S) so only hydrogens on carbons are
assumed and need to be added to the structure below. As always, assume zero charge unless a
charge is shown.
-15-
IR Spectra In-Class Problems Answer Key
Interpret each spectrum to determine the functional group(s)
1. carboxylic acid
2. alcohol and the usual C-H aliphatic peaks (just below 3000 cm-1)
-16-
3. carbonyl: ketone, not aldehyde, ester or amide and the usual C-H aliphatic peaks (just below 3000
cm-1)
-17-
5. carbonyl: ester and the usual C-H aliphatic peaks (just below 3000 cm-1)
6. amine with NH, also there is Aromatic or Vinyl C-H just above 3000 cm-1 and the usual C-H
aliphatic peaks (just below 3000 cm-1)
-18-
IR Spectra In-Class Problems: Actual compounds
Note that you can not determine the actual structure, but comparing the compounds below to the
functional groups assigned above confirms the spectral interpretation. You don’t need this
information, and the complete, correct answers are next to the spectra, but I thought you might be
interested.
1. 3-Phenylpropanoic acid
2. 1-Pentanol
3. 2-Pentanone
4. trans-2-Butenal
5. Methyl butanoate
6. N-butylbenzylamine
-19-
IR Practice Problems:
Interpret each spectrum to determine the functional group(s). Then after you have analyzed the spectra, use the
Compound List to determine which compound best correlates to the spectra data. There will be one best match
for each spectrum.
1. only major peak is the usual C-H aliphatic peaks (just below 3000 cm-1)
2. both the Aromatic or Vinyl C-H (just above 3000 cm-1) and the usual C-H aliphatic peaks (just
below 3000 cm-1)
-20-
3. carbonyl peak at 1718 cm-1, ketone most likely, not aldehyde, amide or ester
Recall that aldehyde (no C-H peaks 2750 and 2850 cm-1), ester (should be 1735 cm-1) or amide (should
be at 1690 cm-1 or lower) usually have a peaks at different frequencies.
4. alcohol peak at 3335 cm-1 with peaks in the C-H aliphatic peaks (just below 3000 cm-1) and the C-H
Aromatic/Vinyl range (just above 3000 cm-1)
-21-
5. carbonyl, most likely ester because carbonyl peak at 1741 cm-1; the usual C-H aliphatic peaks (just
below 3000 cm-1)
6. carboxylic acid due to huge peak starting at about 3200 cm-1; note that you can not really see C-H
aliphatic or aromatic vinyl with carboxylic acids
-22-
7. carbonyl peak at 1703 cm-1: aldehyde, because of two C-H peaks at 2737 and 2820 cm-1; some
small peaks at the C-H Aromatic/Vinyl range (just above 3000 cm-1) but it looks like no peaks at the
C-H aliphatic peaks (just below 3000 cm-1)
8. peaks at the C-H Aromatic/Vinyl range (just above 3000 cm-1) and again it looks like no peaks at
the C-H aliphatic peaks (just below 3000 cm-1). Big peak at 2229 cm-1,
-23-
IR Problem Set - List of Compounds
-24-
13
C NMR Problem Set: Key
1. Determine the numbers of peaks observed in the 13C NMR spectrum for the following
compounds.
They are annotated to let you know the types. Total # of peaks is the highest number
for each compound.
2. You have been given a sample that contains one of the two following compounds. How
would determine which compound you have?
Take a 13C NMR spectrum and count the peaks. If it is the first compound, all the
carbons are of different types, so you'll have 9 peaks. Because of the symmetry of the second
compound, that isomer will only show 3 peaks.
-25-
-26-
-27-
-28-
-29-
-30-
-31-
-32-
Conformational Analysis Practice Problems:
1. For the following molecule, perform a complete conformational analysis using the data provided in
Table 4.3 and 4.4. Follow the following steps to complete the analysis. (Assume no distortion of the
ring due to the oxygen, and assume no steric strain due to electron pairs on oxygen.)
b. Calculate the energy difference between the two chair conformations drawn above.
c. Estimate the ratio of most stable to least stable conformation that could be found in a sample of this
compound at 25oC.
-33-
2. Identify the more stable conformation in each of the following pairs and explain your answer.
-34-
R and S Designation Assignment
Practice Problems: Assign R and S to all Chiral Centers
Br O
OH
CH3 OH NH2
CH3 OH HO OH
CH3
HO O Cl Cl CH3
Cl
CH3
HO
Br Br Br
Br
OH
Answers:
No chiral center
HO O Cl Cl CH3 CH 3
R
Cl S CH3
CH3 Redraw from top view using
wedges, dash notation then assign R and S
R S S R S
HO
Br Br Br
Br
OH
S R R S S S
-35-
-36-
-37-
-38-
-39-
Resonance Practice Problems --Key
Draw additional resonance structures for each of the following molecules. Because most of the
molecules are drawn using skeletal structures, be particularly aware of the valence electrons and where
the implicit hydrogens are. Make sure to assign formal charges where appropriate and use curved
arrows to indicate the movement of electrons to reach the next resonance structure. As a hint, I have
indicated the number of additional resonance structures you should find in each case.
-40-
Draw all valid resonance structures for the following molecules. Note that in some cases there may not
be any.
-41-
-42-
-43-
STABILITY RULES IN THE EVALUATION OF ORGANIC COMPOUNDS--KEY
We will evaluate whether reactions occur based on the stability of the products as compared to
reactants. In addition, we will decide on the product’s structure based on the energetics of reaction
pathways, which will require us to determine the stability of charged species (anions and cations),
often referred to as intermediates.
The evaluation of stability using these tools is extremely valuable in organic chemistry, because
reaction results can be rationalized and as we master these skills, we can predict reaction outcomes
rather than simply memorize them. Importantly, we will use these tools all year so it will be a good
investment to learn these concepts.
Below are example compounds exhibiting the use of these tools. This document is a template to
facilitate lecture and allow for you to think about the questions presented rather than just writing
content down to be learned later. The goal is to present examples that elucidate how the tools we
have learned are applied to stability evaluations.
b.
or
Why?
Hyperconjugation: stabilizing effect due to partial “bonding” interactions (sharing of electron density)
between a filled ⌠-bonding orbital and an empty adjacent orbital. Increasing the substitution of an
alkene, increases the number of possible hyperconjugation interactions between the adjacent
σ -bonding orbitals and the π* molecular orbital of the alkene.
WHAT????!! We will discuss later…
Two more examples: These elimination reactions are very favorable, products are aromatic rings
-45-
4. Cis or Trans Substituents in Cyclics
As we go down a column on the periodic table, atomic size increases, bond length increases and
bond strength decreases. Halogens are a good example, H-F is a weak acid and HI is a very strong
acid. Bond strengths with carbon: C-F > C-Cl > C-Br > C-I. Note, C-Br and C-I ⌠-bonds are not much
stronger than π-bond.
This same analysis works for other periodic table column comparisons:
The H-S bond should be a _longer, weaker_ bond therefore H2S is _more__ acidic.
Could check pKa of each, but you do not need pKa to answer these questions.
But one has to be careful with bond strengths: Elmination reaction shown below favors products
make pi bond and one sigma bond, broke two sigma bonds.
Products seem less stable, yet this reaction proceeds to products.
Why, energy is close, products about 3 kcal/mol more stable due to
Water stability and HO- reactivity, products are favored.
6. Acidity
We can determine if an acid-base reaction occurs, since the product acid must be more stable and
therefore have a higher pKa. This gives us information about the strength of a Y-H bond (Y = any
atom) using pKa’s. Anion analysis works here as well (just like in our acidity comparisons where we
considered the conjugate bases or anions in most cases), which is especially effective if you do not
have pKa values.
pKa=5 pKa=50
pKa=16 pKa=36
-47-
But sometimes need pKa’s for less obvious examples, especially for compounds that you have not
seen comparable pKa values. Can use pKa, but anion analysis works well without pKa,s
Recall that the Inductive effect is a shift of electron density in a molecule due to the polarization of a
bond by a nearby electronegative atom.
sp sp2 sp3
-48-
Orbital Pictures:
2. Carbocations
3o 2o 1o methyl
more stable very unstable, almost never formed
or
3o 2o 1o methyl
more stable very unstable, almost never formed
Hyperconjugation involves partial sharing of electron density between a σ-bonding orbital and an
adjacent empty orbital. In carbocations, the empty p-orbital receives electron density from neighboring
σ-bonds by partial sharing of σ-bonding electrons. This process explains why alkyl groups are weak
electron donating groups (EDG).
Below are two orbital pictures of a 2o carbocation and the partial donation of σ-bonding electrons via
hyperconjugation. Note that any alkyl group attached to the carbocation (including the –CH3 group on
the left side of the molecule) can do this same partial donation of σ-bonding electrons
(hyperconjugation) to help stabilize the positive charge, which is why more alkyl groups attached to
the C+ makes the carbocation more stable.
-49-
Which carbocation is more stable and why?
Inductive effects
Pulling electron density from cation destabilizes it
more stable, both have resonance, the cation more stable, nitrogen a better donor via on the
right puts 6e- around O, not a good or resonance than oxygen, less electronegative
reasonable resonance form
Bonus Topic:
Alkene Stabilization via Hyperconjugation
Hyperconjugation: stabilizing effect due to partial “bonding” interactions (sharing of electron density)
between a filled ⌠-bonding orbital and an empty adjacent orbital. Increasing the substitution of an
alkene, increases the number of possible hyperconjugation interactions between the adjacent ⌠ -
bonding orbitals and the π* molecular orbital of the alkene.
In common language, we know that more highly substituted alkenes are more stable and we are not
really sure why. Best theoretical explanation is the partial donation of the ⌠-bonding electrons to the
π* antibonding orbital, when one considers the molecular orbital description of a compound with a π-
bond. Below are two pictures that might help you visualize this:
-50-
Why does donation of electron density to the π∗-antibonding orbital yield stabilization for the alkene
compound? And what is the π*-antibonding orbital? We will cover molecular orbital theory in more
detail later in the course, so be happy for now that you can talk about complicated chemistry terms
you know nothing about. What we do need to know is more highly substituted alkenes are more
stable and the theoretical explanation is less critcal, we care more about the experimental results and
the trends that we can use to predict reaction outcomes.
-51-
EXAMPLE REACTIONS-MECHANISM TEMPLATES
Substitution Reaction
-52-
Elimination Reaction
Summary: On the addition of HX (HCl, HBr, HI) the Cl, Br or I goes where the cation was formed, so
the most stable carbocation controls the location of addition of H+ and therefore, X-
Predict Products Using Stability Rules – Use Intermediate Cation Stability and Not Product Stability
-55-
Reaction Coordinate for Elimination Reaction
Mechanism:
-56-
Reaction Coordinate for Addition Reaction
Mechanism:
-57-
-58-
-59-
-60-
Draw a stepwise mechanism for the following reaction: HBr Addition
-61-
SN2 vs. E2 Reactions -- Focusing on the most important, competing reactions KEY
The basicity of the base/nucleophile and the structure of the alkyl halide are the most important factors
to consider when deciding whether a reaction proceeds by a SN2 or E2 mechanism. See the simplified
rules for SN2 vs. E2 below.
b.
c.
-62-
d.
e.
f.
h.
i.
-63-
j.
k.
l.
m.
n.
-64-
o.
p.
q.
r.
s.
-65-
t.
u.
v.
-66-
Substitution vs Elimination Practice Problems: KEY
For the following reactions give the major product of the reaction and the mechanism (SN1, SN2, E1,
E2). Be sure to include the stereochemical outcome.
a.
b.
d.
e.
f.
g.
-67-
h.
i.
-68-
Substitution vs Elimination Practice Problems: In Class Problems 2 KEY
For the following reactions give the major product of the reaction and the mechanism (SN1, SN2, E1,
E2). Be sure to include the stereochemical outcome.
a.
b.
d.
e.
f.
g.
-69-
-70-
-71-
-72-
-73-
-74-
-75-
-76-
Alkene Reaction Drill Problems
-77-
-78-
-79-
-80-
-81-
-82-
-83-
-84-
-85-
Alkyne Addition Reactions-Predict HBr Addition to Alkynes
-Addition of 1 equivalent of HBr or Addition of 2 equivalents of HBr
HBr
Br H
Mechanism:
Br
HBr H Br H
H H
H
HBr
Br
Mechanism:
Br
HBr Br
H H
H
HBr
Br H
Br H
2 equiv. H
Mechanism:
Br
HBr Br H Br H Br H
H Br H
H 2nd addition H H
H HBr Resonance
Stabilized Br H
Cation
H
HBr
Br H
Br H
2 equiv. H
Mechanism:
Br
HBr Br Br Br
H Br H
H H H
2nd addition
H Resonance
HBr Stabilized Br
Cation H
H
-86-
Bromine Addition (Br2) - Addition of 1 equivalent of Br2 or Addition of 2 equivalents of Br2
-Bromonium Ion Intermediate?
Br 2 Br H H
+
Br Br Br
Mechanism:
Br
Br 2 H Br H H
top or bottom +
Br face attack of Br- Br Br Br
Br Br Br Get mixture of products, sterics are
not significant with Br and -CH3
Br 2 Br
+
Br Br Br
Mechanism:
Br
Br 2 top face attack Br
+
Br of Br- preferred
Br Br Br
Br Br Major
Product - biggest groups trans
Br 2 Br Br
Br H
Br
2 equiv.
Mechanism:
1st Additon Br
Product
Br 2 Br H Br 2
Br H Br Br
Br Br H
Br Br
2nd addition
Br
Bromonium Ion
Br 2
Br
Br Br
2 equiv. Br
Br- can attach either
Mechanism: carbon
1st Additon Br
Product
Br 2 Br Br 2 Br Br
Br Br Br
Br Br
2nd addition Br
Br Br Bromonium Ion
-87-
Hydration Reactions
-Overview of Hydration and Tautomerization of Enols to Carbonyl – Mechanism
-Oxymercuration and Hydroboration: Differences in Regiochemistry to form Enols
Mechanism:
H H H 2O H O H -H O H Resonance O H H
H H H H
Oxymercuration:
HgSO 4, H 2SO 4 H O H O H
H
H 2O
H H
Mechanism:
Hydroboration:
1. BH 3,, THF H O H H O
H
2. H 2O2, NaOH
H H
Mechanism:
1. BH 3,, THF
HgSO 4, H 2SO 4 or O H
H or H
H 2O 2. H 2O2, NaOH
H O
Mechanism:
No regiochemistry H H H H
to consider
-88-
Hydrogenation – Addition of H2 to an Alkyne
-Alkyne vs. Alkene Stability
H2 H2
catalyst catalyst
Reaction 1 Reaction 2
Alkyne to Alkene is faster than
Reaction 2, Alkene to Alkane
H 2, Pd/C H 2 in excess
AND Alkenes
react with Pd/C H 2
Surface catalyst
yields Syn Addition
Addition of 1 equivalent of H2
-Lindlar’s Catalyst and H2 -- A catalyst that is “deactivated” to stop the reaction at the Alkene stage.
So Reaction 2 (shown above) is so slow it effectively does not occur. Reaction 1 is faster and can
occur even with the deactivated Lindlar’s Catalyst:
H
+H from H H +H from
Na, NH 3 H N H
H
-89-
Oxidative Cleavage of Alkynes
-Ozonolysis (1. O3; 2. Zn AcOH)
1) O3 O O Alkynes are cleaved to form
+ carboxylic acids.
2) Zn, HOAc OH OH
O O Oxid. O
1) O3
+ CO 2 + H 2O
OH H OH HO OH
2) Zn, HOAc
H NH 2
H C C H
H C C or
SN2
Mechanism:
Br
-90-
Example 2 Acetylene Anion Alkylation:
2. Br
or C
H C C or C
SN2 H
Mechanism:
H C C or C
or C
Br H
made new C-C sigma bond made new C-C sigma bond
2. Transform the Alkyne to the Desired Functional Group
-Functional Group Interconversion (FGI) – change or transform the triple bond to another functional
group
We have our compounds with the correct chain length with the triple bond in the proper location:
So now we just need to transform the triple bond to the functional group we need in the target
compound. Could take one or more reactions.
FGI: What reaction(s)
need to be used to convert
triple bond to trans alkene?
or Retrosynthetic
1 Arrow
1
O O
H H H
2 2
Step 2: Determine how to make the carbon backbone by specifically deciding on what R-Br
compound(s) will be needed to make the chain the correct length.
Compound 1: Compound 2:
Br
H
Br
-91-
-92-
-93-
-94-
-95-
-96-
-97-
-98-
-99-
-100-
-101-
-102-
-103-