0% found this document useful (0 votes)
49 views5 pages

Art as Inquiry: K-12 Art Education Review

The document is a review of the 'Art as Inquiry' website, which presents a contemporary art-based curriculum for K–12 classrooms developed by Julia Marshall and Liz McAvoy. It emphasizes student exploration through independent inquiry and aligns with Project Zero frameworks from Harvard, promoting metacognition and creativity in art education. The website serves as a resource for art teachers to implement inquiry-based learning and develop student-driven lessons.

Uploaded by

amitakhandpur
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
49 views5 pages

Art as Inquiry: K-12 Art Education Review

The document is a review of the 'Art as Inquiry' website, which presents a contemporary art-based curriculum for K–12 classrooms developed by Julia Marshall and Liz McAvoy. It emphasizes student exploration through independent inquiry and aligns with Project Zero frameworks from Harvard, promoting metacognition and creativity in art education. The website serves as a resource for art teachers to implement inquiry-based learning and develop student-driven lessons.

Uploaded by

amitakhandpur
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

eta 18 (3) pp.

435–438 Intellect Limited 2022

International Journal of Education Through Art


Volume 18 Number 3
© 2022 Intellect Ltd Website Review. English language.
[Link]

WEBSITE REVIEW

ART AS INQUIRY
Art as Inquiry: [Link]

Reviewed by Cindy T. Davis, University of North Texas, USA

Art as Inquiry ([Link] is a contemporary art-based


curriculum designed for the K–12 art classroom. Julia Marshall, San Francisco
University professor emeritus, and Liz McAvoy, San Francisco middle school
teacher, developed the Art as Inquiry methodology to encourage student
exploration. The website is bright, colourful and inviting, with student-
crafted mappings of the direct inquiry cycle, an Art as Inquiry teaching method
outcome. This website review offers an overview of Art as Inquiry with a
website synopsis, noting valuable K–12 art education content.

ART AS INQUIRY OVERVIEW


Art as Inquiry supports ways of thinking and teaching art, providing students
opportunities to develop independent learning paths based on personal inter-
ests and independent student questioning. The Art as Inquiry process aligns
with contemporary art education techniques and invites art instructors to
rethink and retool their classroom approaches. With this form of teaching,
student outcomes are intentional and utilize examination to promote and
guide instruction. The process incorporates five core tenets: art as investiga-
tion, art as learning, art as aesthetic works, art as emotional expression and art
as prompting change and ideas.
Student learning is supported through Art as Inquiry by promoting inde-
pendent thinking and investigation. Art projects bridge what students are
learning inside the classroom to outside the school. Techniques include using
technical and formal training in art and inquiry, encouraging students to ask
questions and then search for answers – developing student research skills.
Guided and coached by their teachers, students document and reflect on

[Link]  435
Cindy T. Davis

individual thinking and learning processes. The teacher supports and encour-
ages creative thinking by stimulating deep and broad thought-forms. Lessons
provide open-ended instruction and enable students to design imaginative,
innovative, one-of-a-kind artworks. Students use a journal to record research,
visual images and concept maps throughout the process. Direct inquiry cycle
diagrams are developed out of process content, through students’ visual docu-
mentation of their process, thoughts and ideas. Additionally, students learn
from each other, sharing research, ideas and completed projects. No two
students learning cycles are the same as their independent questions drive
their lines of inquiry.
A strength of this teaching is that it balances three Project Zero frame-
works. Project Zero is a research centre at Harvard University that investi-
gates the topics of thinking, understanding, intelligence, creativity and ethics
(Alvarado 2017). The three frameworks are: Teaching for Understanding (TfU),
Making Learning Visible and Studio Thinking. TfU promotes teacher inten-
tionality in curriculum and pedagogy; it utilizes lesson themes of conse-
quence to the learners and the teacher. The TfU curriculum addresses essential
topics related to the students’ worlds by employing enduring ideas, big ideas
or overarching concepts. Additionally, TfU supports setting goals for learning
outcomes and engaging learners in generative questions that lend themselves
to student reflection, yet another component of the TfU framework.
The second framework identified by Project Zero, and included in Art as
Inquiry, is the Making Learning Visible framework. This framework empha-
sizes building student metacognition and making what they are learning visi-
ble. With Making Learning Visible, students learn to employ visual processing,
concept maps and visual reflections while continuing to generate ideas for their
artwork through the exploration of personal lines of inquiry. Throughout each
lesson, students document thoughts, connections and reviews. Essentially, the
students control and record their learning while the teacher acts as a guide.
This self-documentation results in colourful cycle mappings and individual art
project conceptions based on directed inquiry.
Studio Thinking is the third Project Zero framework blended into the Art
as Inquiry process. This framework establishes a working artist’s mindset in the
classroom. It incorporates eight Studio Habits of Mind (SHoM): observe, envi-
sion, express, reflect, stretch and explore, engage and persist, understand the
art world and develop craft. SHoM is embraced by Art as Inquiry for several
reasons. First, there is an emphasized move away from final products towards
the process of artmaking. Next, attention is brought to the natural behaviours
of the art studio while providing names for the actions taken on by the artist.
Additionally, it opens space for all students to excel at the behaviours that fit
them best. However, one of the core reasons for incorporating SHoM is the
habit of ‘stretch and explore’ and ‘engage and persist’. These two habits are
at the heart of the Art as Inquiry process as they promote risk-taking, learn-
ing from mistakes and playful exploration. They are the habits that encour-
age students to connect their learning outside the classroom, including other
educational disciplines and professions.
Along with explaining the Art as Inquiry process, the website provides
a foundational understanding of the three Project Zero frameworks, defin-
ing key terminology, offering questions to ask oneself, and a process plan for
implementation of Art as Inquiry with K–12 art education. It provides steps
for setting up a classroom to familiarize students with vocabulary and the art-
based inquiry process. The Art of Inquiry website recommends introducing

436   International Journal of Education Through Art


Art as Inquiry

the teaching of ideas – i.e., pollution, community, environment, life cycles


– through direct exploration, guided inquiry and independent investiga-
tions. The idea is to make learning visible to students by building metacog-
nition, showing students what they have learned by having them map ideas
and reflections while assembling graphic displays that show student-based
evidence of learning and artistic artefacts. Students view their progression of
ideas and their peers through visual project displays.
While open-ended inquiry is the goal, lessons are not without assess-
ment. Student work evaluation includes criteria established by the teacher; the
requirements should be well-defined, meaningful and presented to students
to ensure the meeting of curriculum goals. The requirements are specific yet
objective, offering students measurable performance and learning objectives.
Methods are also measured so that student can see their development and
the teacher can see adjustments needed in the curriculum. Assessments also
include group and individual documentation – student walls, portfolios and
research journals.

WHAT YOU WILL FIND ON THE WEBSITE


After viewing the site home page ([Link] I found the
‘Getting started in the classroom’ menu to be the best place to get started. The
first stop was the ‘Frameworks’, which explains the Project Zero Frameworks.
Next, I visited the ‘Types of inquiry strategies’, which includes the three stages
of inquiry: directed, guided and independent trails. I spent most of my time on
this page developing an implementation understanding of the Art as Inquiry
strategies.
Direct inquiry trails are the starting point for Art as Inquiry; these inves-
tigations incorporate in-depth teacher-directed lesson plans spanning one to
four weeks – the website offers two adaptable by grade level or skill set sample
lesson plans. Once students start to master the Art as Inquiry process, ideally,
they begin to take control of their learning path, moving from lessons with
direct inquiry trails to ones with more guided inquiry trail lessons. The guided
inquiry trail lessons are both teacher and student-driven. Whereas the final
inquiry stage, the independent trails, is entirely student-driven and sparked by
student interests and investigations. The website offers a lesson plan sample to
demonstrate the fully student-driven approach. While the three distinct stages,
directed, guided and independent, appear as a linear progression for learning
purposes, classroom projects do not need to stay at the independent level. The
teacher still establishes classroom goals and guides students’ instruction to
ensure the meeting of learning objectives. However, once students master all
three levels of inquiry trails, instructions can be directed by the teacher down
any of the inquiry trails based on the overall course curriculum.
Other useful things you will find on the site include suggestions for estab-
lishing classroom routines and assessments, a contemporary art gallery and a
student sample gallery that include student completed project images. There is
also a resource link to a list of books and articles to read for more support on
art-based inquiry and contemporary art education. Additionally, if you teach
through distanced learning, there is content and resources for consideration.
A final tool provided is the ‘Inquiry trail submission form’ found under the
‘Lesson submissions’ tab. This form allows for submitting an arts-based, inter-
disciplinary creativity lesson to initiate collaboration with the website found-
ers to develop a comprehensive Art as Inquiry lesson plan.

[Link]  437
Cindy T. Davis

The Art as Inquiry website is a resource for art teachers interested in build-
ing independent inquiry skills in students; it provides a starting point for art-
based research, building inquiry into learning, developing student-driven
lessons, incorporating SHoM principles into the classroom and more. Lastly, it
is worth noting how this site is not only designed for art educators to retrieve
information, but also to build community and get assistance in developing
techniques for implementation through the ‘Contact us’ drop-down menu,
sharing lesson plan experiences and getting help to convert art-based lesson
plans to Art as Inquiry lesson plans.

REFERENCES
Alvarado, S. (2017), Askwith Essentials: What is Project Zero?, Cambridge, MA:
Harvard Graduate School of Education, [Link]
news/17/10/askwith-essentials-what-project-zero#:~:text=Project%20
Zero%20is%20a%20research,intelligence%2C%20creativity%2C%20
and%20ethics. Accessed 16 February 2022.
McAvoy, L. and Art as Inquiry (n.d.), ‘Shifting perspective in art education’, Art
as Inquiry, [Link] Accessed 1 February 2022.

CONTRIBUTOR DETAILS
Cindy T. Davis (Ph.D.) works as a teaching fellow (art education) at University
of North Texas, where she instructs, coaches and mentors pre-service art
teachers. Cindy is presently working on her research project, which includes
project-based design thinking, offering design thinking as a tool for develop-
ing lesson plan for real-world case studies.
Contact: University of North Texas, 1155 Union Cir, Denton, TX 76203, USA.
E-mail: cindydavis@[Link]

[Link]

438   International Journal of Education Through Art


Copyright of International Journal of Education through Art is the property of Intellect Ltd.
and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without
the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or
email articles for individual use.

Common questions

Powered by AI

The Art as Inquiry methodology facilitates the documentation of student learning and reflection by incorporating tools such as journals, concept maps, and visual project displays . Students are encouraged to record their thought processes, ideas, and reflections throughout the inquiry cycles, leading to a clear visual representation of their learning journey . This documentation supports metacognition, enabling students to observe and assess their own learning progression . Sharing these reflections with peers further enhances the learning experience, providing opportunities for collaborative learning and feedback .

Implementing the Art as Inquiry process in K-12 classrooms presents several challenges and benefits. Challenges may include adjusting traditional teaching methods, requiring a shift in classroom dynamics toward student-centered learning, and ensuring teachers are trained in inquiry-based methodologies . Resources and time constraints could also pose challenges . However, the benefits include fostering critical thinking, creativity, and independent learning in students . It encourages students to link art with personal experiences and other academic disciplines, potentially leading to a deeper engagement with learning materials . Overall, while implementation may demand significant effort, it promises transformative educational outcomes.

Art as Inquiry bridges the gap between classroom learning and real-world applications by connecting art projects to contemporary, real-world themes such as pollution, community, and environment . The methodology encourages inquiry-based learning where students pose and explore questions relevant to their everyday experiences . This approach promotes the development of transferable skills, such as critical thinking and problem-solving, applicable across various disciplines . By grounding art education in real-world contexts, Art as Inquiry enriches student engagement and underscores the relevance of art in addressing broader societal issues.

To successfully implement the Art as Inquiry approach, teachers are advised to familiarize themselves with the foundational concepts and inquiry stages of the methodology . This includes beginning with directed inquiry trails to build foundational skills before advancing to more student-driven methods . Teachers should establish clear, meaningful assessment criteria to evaluate student work and document learning progress . Utilizing resources such as the Project Zero frameworks can guide intentional teaching strategies that support inquiry-based learning . Additionally, fostering a supportive classroom environment that encourages risk-taking and exploration is key to successful implementation.

The Art as Inquiry methodology advances independent student learning and creativity by encouraging students to develop personal learning paths through independent questioning and research skills . Art projects connect classroom learning with real-world contexts, promoting self-expression and critical thinking . Students document their processes, develop concept maps, and share findings with peers, allowing for diverse creative outputs . Additionally, the methodology includes stages of inquiry—directed, guided, and independent—that transition from teacher-led to entirely student-driven learning .

The Art as Inquiry website serves as a resource for art educators by offering comprehensive information on art-based inquiry and the Project Zero frameworks . It provides practical tools such as sample lesson plans, strategies for inquiry stages, and methods for establishing classroom routines . The site also features a gallery of student projects, a list of recommended readings, and resources for distance learning . Additionally, it facilitates educator collaboration through lesson plan submissions and community-building support via the 'Contact us' menu . These resources help teachers integrate inquiry-based learning into their curriculum effectively.

The Art as Inquiry process integrates the Project Zero frameworks by adopting Teaching for Understanding (TfU), Making Learning Visible, and Studio Thinking. TfU emphasizes intentionality in curriculum and pedagogy, supporting the establishment of overarching concepts relevant to students' worlds . Making Learning Visible focuses on metacognition, teaching students to document their learning through visual means, which aids in making learning paths visible . Studio Thinking incorporates eight Studio Habits of Mind, focusing on developing an artist’s mindset in students, such as observing, reflecting, and risk-taking . Together, these frameworks enable a comprehensive, student-centered approach that builds independent thinking and inquiry skills.

The direct, guided, and independent inquiry stages represent different levels of student autonomy in the Art as Inquiry methodology. The directed inquiry stage involves teacher-directed lesson plans that provide structured guidance over one to four weeks . As students gain proficiency, they transition to the guided inquiry stage, where they share control with the teacher, allowing more student-driven exploration while still receiving guidance . Finally, the independent inquiry stage is fully student-directed, driven by students’ interests and investigations, encouraging exploration and in-depth research . This progression fosters increasing independence and self-directed learning.

The Studio Habits of Mind (SHoM) play a crucial role in the Art as Inquiry framework by fostering a mindset conducive to an artist's practices. It emphasizes habits such as observing, envisioning, reflecting, and engaging . Particularly, the habits 'stretch and explore' and 'engage and persist' are central, encouraging students to take creative risks and learn through play and exploration . These habits contribute to student learning outcomes by supporting risk-taking, mistake-driven learning, and connecting art to other disciplines and professions . This holistic integration develops both the cognitive and practical skills essential for artistic practice.

The Art as Inquiry process uses the Teaching for Understanding (TfU) framework by setting intentional, goal-oriented learning outcomes that align with students’ interests and experiences . The TfU framework focuses on establishing enduring themes and big ideas, enabling students to engage with consequential topics . This approach aids in integrating art education with broader educational themes, encouraging generative questioning and reflection. The framework's alignment with learning outcomes ensures that art lessons are not only educational but relevant to students' lived experiences and personal growth .

You might also like