Scribd
Upload
23 views2 pages

AHP Analysis for Toll Group Vehicles

The AHP solution for Toll Group prioritizes criteria as follows: Cost (0.2927), Environmental Impact (0.4922), Delivery Efficiency (0.1448), and Stakeholder Impact (0.0703), with an acceptable consistency ratio of 0.0629. The final aggregated priorities indicate that Electric Vehicles (EV) are the recommended choice with a priority of 0.5436, followed by Hybrid Vehicles (HV) at 0.3339 and Internal Combustion Engine Vehicles (ICEV) at 0.1224. Decision-makers may consider lower-ranked options based on qualitative or strategic factors despite AHP results.

Uploaded by

mewithbois
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
23 views2 pages

AHP Analysis for Toll Group Vehicles

The AHP solution for Toll Group prioritizes criteria as follows: Cost (0.2927), Environmental Impact (0.4922), Delivery Efficiency (0.1448), and Stakeholder Impact (0.0703), with an acceptable consistency ratio of 0.0629. The final aggregated priorities indicate that Electric Vehicles (EV) are the recommended choice with a priority of 0.5436, followed by Hybrid Vehicles (HV) at 0.3339 and Internal Combustion Engine Vehicles (ICEV) at 0.1224. Decision-makers may consider lower-ranked options based on qualitative or strategic factors despite AHP results.

Uploaded by

mewithbois
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Question 2: AHP Solution for Toll Group

Solution

Criteria Priorities:
Cost: 0.2927

Environmental Impact: 0.4922

Delivery Efficiency: 0.1448

Stakeholder Impact: 0.0703

Criteria CR: 0.0629 (Acceptable if <0.10)

Priorities under each criterion:


Cost:

- EV: 0.6250

- HV: 0.2385

- ICEV: 0.1365

Environmental Impact:

- EV: 0.6175

- HV: 0.2969

- ICEV: 0.0856

Delivery Efficiency:

- EV: 0.1265

- HV: 0.6870

- ICEV: 0.1865

Stakeholder Impact:

- EV: 0.5472

- HV: 0.2631
- ICEV: 0.1897

Final Aggregated Priorities:

EV: 0.5436

HV: 0.3339

ICEV: 0.1224

Recommended Vehicle:
EV
Under certain circumstances (such as budget limitations or policy constraints), a decision-
maker may still choose a lower-ranked option despite the AHP results, if qualitative or
strategic factors justify it.

You might also like